The neuropathophysiology of anorexia nervosa (AN) remains complex, enigmatic, and controversial, and the disorder is reported to affect 0.5% of Western young women [
1]. Experienced clinicians recognise that the treatment of severe, life threatening AN necessitates a multifaceted approach, which best takes place within a specialised eating disorder inpatient unit that can appropriately meet these patients' complex psychosocial and biological needs [
2]. For more than 50 years the World Health Organisation has recognised that “the creation of the atmosphere of a therapeutic (milieu) is in itself, one of the most important types of treatment which the hospital can provide” [
3]. Milieu therapy, by definition, offers the safety, structure, support, validation, and involvement of living in a therapeutic community [
4]. Such a therapeutic environment may hold especial promise for young patients with AN, who are often observed to have great difficulty in regulating and expressing their emotional states. This has led to the suggestion that AN, especially in young girls is “an illness of communication between the world inside themselves and the world outside—an illness of emotional communication” [
5]. Research consistently presents findings of significantly greater difficulties in emotional recognition, description, and regulation in females with AN, especially adolescents [
6–
8].
Of particular importance is that female adolescents with AN have been shown to have a discrepancy between neuroendocrine stress responses, in terms of the hormone cortisol, and
self-reported emotional arousal to psychosocial stress [
9]. This suggests that cortisol could be a useful biomarker for adolescent AN. Indeed, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has been proposed as a central component of dysregulation in adolescent AN [
10], as it provides an insight into “upstream” influences regarding stress and the effects on health and disease. It has been suggested that an accurate understanding of HPA axis function at different stages of AN would enable more accurate and objective monitoring of therapeutic progress, as well as vulnerability [
11].
Both cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) are important physiological mediators of the HPA axis, and are measureable in saliva. Salivary measures of adrenal steroids are well-established in psychoneuroendocrine research, namely because the collection of samples is non-invasive, thus multiple samples can be performed in the naturalistic environment without the need for medical personnel [
12,
13]. Cortisol and DHEA are valid candidates for clinically relevant research because of their distinct rhythmicity; both exhibit a marked circadian rhythm, with a diurnal decline from a morning peak to an evening nadir [
14,
15]. Therefore deviations in the “norm” of these rhythms may provide vital insights for understanding different psychopathologies [
16,
17]. Awakening is a critical part of the diurnal cycle and cortisol concentrations change rapidly during the immediate post-awakening period, with up to 100% increase [
18]. This phenomenon is known as the cortisol awakening response (CAR). The CAR is recognised as a distinct component within the diurnal cortisol rhythm [
12], and accordingly should be analysed separately compared to the rest of the daytime profile [
19]. Dysregulation in the CAR has been linked with chronic stress, major depressive disorder, and a range of health conditions in adults [
12,
20] as well as children and adolescents [
21–
23].
However, despite the fact that the measurement of salivary HPA axis hormones has been widely used in paediatric research for more than 20 years [
24], the employment of such biomarkers in the field of AN, and adolescent AN in particular, is somewhat lacking. The CAR, but not the rest of the diurnal cycle, has recently been examined in a cross-sectional study of adult female outpatients [
25], and short day-profiles only have been examined in female adolescents [
26]. It remains unknown whether the hypersecretion in AN patients reported by both of these studies is accompanied by normalisation on recovery. Studies of cortisol and DHEA in AN include single, timed blood or saliva samples which only provide snapshots of HPA axis activity (e.g., [
27]). A study examining HPA axis function synchronised to individual awakening (to include the CAR) during illness in adolescent AN and at clinical recovery, taking into account a measure of affect, is warranted.
We used a case study longitudinal approach to examine the diurnal pattern of cortisol and DHEA secretion in a single female adolescent both during illness and one year following discharge from treatment (when she was clinically recovered and back in community life). We set out to use the best-recommended methodology for profiling salivary indicators of HPA axis function: multiple samples over the day (separate analysis of the awakening and daytime periods), strict reference to time of awakening, two consecutive sampling weekdays to check for consistency, and careful checks on participant adherence to protocol. Furthermore, the present study adds the complexity of specialised case study statistical analyses to provide additional scrutiny in examining outcomes. Overall, we aimed to examine the effect of milieu therapy focused on affect regulation within a specialised inpatient service for adolescent AN. Our hypothesis was that at baseline, the patient's diurnal rhythms of cortisol and DHEA would be dysregulated and these indicators of HPA axis would normalise when she was recovered.