Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jcellbiolHomeThe Rockefeller University PressThis articleEditorsContactInstructions for AuthorsThis issue
J Cell Biol. 2012 December 24; 199(7): 1117–1130.
PMCID: PMC3529533

Lkb1 regulates organogenesis and early oncogenesis along AMPK-dependent and -independent pathways


The tumor suppressor Lkb1/STK11/Par-4 is a key regulator of cellular energy, proliferation, and polarity, yet its mechanisms of action remain poorly defined. We generated mice harboring a mutant Lkb1 knockin allele that allows for rapid inhibition of Lkb1 kinase. Culturing embryonic tissues, we show that acute loss of kinase activity perturbs epithelial morphogenesis without affecting cell polarity. In pancreas, cystic structures developed rapidly after Lkb1 inhibition. In lung, inhibition resulted in cell-autonomous branching defects. Although the lung phenotype was rescued by an activator of the Lkb1 target adenosine monophosphate–activated kinase (AMPK), pancreatic cyst development was independent of AMPK signaling. Remarkably, the pancreatic phenotype evolved to resemble precancerous lesions, demonstrating that loss of Lkb1 was sufficient to drive the initial steps of carcinogenesis ex vivo. A similar phenotype was induced by expression of mutant K-Ras with p16/p19 deletion. Combining culture of embryonic tissues with genetic manipulation and chemical genetics thus provides a powerful approach to unraveling developmental programs and understanding cancer initiation.


Germline mutations in the serine/threonine kinase Lkb1 (Par-4/STK11/XEEK1) result in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), an autosomal-dominant syndrome characterized by benign gastrointestinal hamartomas and pigmentation abnormalities (Jeghers et al., 1949; Hemminki et al., 1998; Jenne et al., 1998). PJS patients are at increased risk for developing epithelial cancers (Hearle et al., 2006; Mehenni et al., 2006) with most PJS alleles reflecting deletions or inactivating mutations in the kinase domain of Lkb1 (Alessi et al., 2006). In addition, many sporadic cancers exhibit Lkb1 mutations or deletion, especially adenocarcinoma of the lung (at least 30% of cases; Sanchez-Cespedes, 2007).

Lkb1 (Par-4) is of additional interest because of its role in controlling asymmetric partitioning of the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo (Kemphues et al., 1988). It also has been implicated as a key regulator of cell polarity in cultured epithelial cells (Baas et al., 2004). How Lkb1 accomplishes these and its other diverse functions, however, is poorly understood. Lkb1 is best known for its ability to phosphorylate and activate AMP kinase (AMPK) as part of a sensing mechanism of cellular energy status with inputs into metabolic pathways and mTOR activity (Hawley et al., 2003; Lizcano et al., 2004; Shaw et al., 2004). Although these two components themselves have been linked to a variety of additional functions such as adhesion, proliferation, and polarity, Lkb1 likely has several additional relevant targets (Baas et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2007; Mirouse et al., 2007; ten Klooster et al., 2009). For example, Par-1 is the Lkb1 target in the C. elegans embryo that contributes to defining its posterior domain (Kemphues et al., 1988), and MARK2, the Par-1 mammalian homologue, is targeted by an Helicobacter pylori virulence factor to disrupt epithelial polarity (Saadat et al., 2007). The SAD-A/B kinases and SIK1/2 kinases together with Lkb1 modulate neuronal polarization (Barnes et al., 2007) and anoikis (Cheng et al., 2009), and Lkb1-NUAK signaling controls a phosphatase complex that regulates myosin light chain and cell adhesion (Zagórska et al., 2010).

Genetic evidence from mouse models has clearly demonstrated that Lkb1 is a tumor suppressor, although it is unclear which of its activities are most relevant, if these activities are the same in cancers of different tissues, or even if Lkb1’s kinase activity is required. Although Lkb1−/− mice die early in embryogenesis (Ylikorkala et al., 2001; Jishage et al., 2002), heterozygous littermates develop gastrointestinal hamartomas (Bardeesy et al., 2002; Miyoshi et al., 2002; Rossi et al., 2002). Conditional deletions of Lkb1 result in metaplasias and neoplasias (Hezel et al., 2008; Pearson et al., 2008; Shorning et al., 2009), whereas loss of Lkb1 combined with an activated oncogene or inactivation of a second mutant tumor suppressor provokes more rapid tumor development in lung, pancreas, and various other organs (Ji et al., 2007; Huang et al., 2008; Morton et al., 2010).

Although Cre-mediated inactivation of Lkb1 has established the importance of Lkb1 in normal development and oncogenesis in a variety of mammalian organ systems, progress has been greatly limited by the fact that such models have not enabled mechanistic analysis. Knockouts provide only chronic inactivation of Lkb1 in a fashion that cannot be manipulated either spatially or temporally. In addition, the effects obtained by gene deletions may not reproduce phenotypes associated with kinase inactivation because the nonkinase domains of Lkb1 could serve as a scaffold for other proteins. Thus, there is a clear need to complement standard gene inactivation approaches with strategies that allow for specific, acute, and reversible inhibition of Lkb1 kinase activity and under conditions where these effects can be monitored in living cells. To this end, we have produced a mouse expressing an analogue-sensitive kinase allele (ASKA) of Lkb1 that can be inhibited by membrane-permeable derivatives of the small molecule inhibitor PP1 (Bishop et al., 2000). By combining with a generally applicable approach to ex vivo culture of developing embryonic organs, we have found that Lkb1 kinase activity functions differently in the morphogenesis of different epithelial tissues. Moreover, our experimental system can be used to generate what appear to be the earliest events in tumor formation, enabling detailed cell biological, biochemical, and genetic analysis.


Lkb1 does not control intrinsic epithelial cell polarity in MDCK cells

The observation that activation of functional Lkb1 in a colon cancer cell line rapidly induced polarity (Baas et al., 2004) led us to investigate whether loss of Lkb1 in a nontransformed epithelial cell would result in disruption of polarity. Endogenous Lkb1 was stably knocked down using shRNA in MDCK cells (Fig. 1 A, left), but, surprisingly, Lkb1 loss did not perturb apical-basal polarity. In MDCK monolayers (Fig. 1 A, middle) and in spheroids grown as 3D Matrigel cultures (Fig. 1 A, right), the pattern of apical, basolateral, and tight junctional markers remained unchanged. Although loss of Lkb1 did result in a delay in calcium-induced tight junction assembly (unpublished data), a subtle polarity-related phenotype previously seen in MDCK cells overexpressing dominant-negative Lkb1 or AMPK alleles (Zhang et al., 2006; Zheng and Cantley, 2007), lack of a strong apical-basal polarity phenotype suggested to us that Lkb1 does not control intrinsic cell polarity in MDCK cells. Nevertheless, rapid adaptation to Lkb1 knockdown or the lack of a tissue context may have obscured a role for Lkb1 in regulating polarity. We therefore developed a mouse model using a chemical-genetic approach that allows for acute and reversible inhibition of Lkb1 kinase activity in a physiological context.

Figure 1.
Development of an Lkb1 ASKA knockin mouse. (A, left) Lkb1 was stably knocked down in MDCK cells using a retroviral shRNA system. Cell lysates were blotted with antibodies to Lkb1 and actin. (middle) The tight junction marker ZO-1, apical marker gp135, ...

Generation of Lkb1 ASKA knockin mice

For a range of kinases, mutation of the “gatekeeper” residue in the ATP-binding pocket renders the kinase susceptible to small molecule analogues of the general kinase inhibitor PP1 (Bishop et al., 2000). We identified the methionine at position 129 as the gatekeeper residue for Lkb1 by analysis of the primary amino acid sequence (Zhang et al., 2005) and substituted a glycine to create Lkb1M129G (Fig. S1 A). Using HeLa cells, we first verified that Lkb1M129G retained kinase activity toward its substrate AMPK and that this activity was inhibited by 1NMPP1 (Fig. S1 B). We then generated knockin mice to replace the wild-type Lkb1 with Lkb1M129G (Fig. 1 B; see Materials and methods).

Results of heterozygous intercrosses indicated that mice homozygous for Lkb1M129G (hereafter referred to as Lkb1MG) exhibited an unexpected late embryonic lethality. Histological examination of embryonic day (E) 14.5 embryos, however, uncovered no significant differences in the developmental patterning of Lkb1MG/MG embryos compared with wild-type littermates, indicating gastrulation and organogenesis were unaffected by the knockin allele (Fig. 1 C). This was in sharp contrast to the early (E9.5) embryonic lethality with vascular and severe neural tube defects seen in Lkb1 null mice (Ylikorkala et al., 2001; Jishage et al., 2002). Because no anatomical abnormality was identified, we speculated that Lkb1MG is a hypomorphic allele that caused placental or metabolic insufficiency late in gestation.

Indeed, in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), the steady-state levels of Lkb1MG protein were significantly reduced relative to the wild-type protein (Fig. 1 D, lanes 1 and 2 vs. 5 and 6). The reduction likely reflected posttranslational protein instability because RT-PCR showed no reduction in Lkb1MG mRNA levels (Fig. S1 C). Moreover, the addition of 1NMPP1 increased Lkb1MG protein levels (Fig. 1 D, lanes 7 and 8; and Fig. S1 D), suggesting that binding of the ATP analogue stabilized the mutant kinase in a conformation less susceptible to degradation. Nevertheless, Lkb1MG retained the ability to phosphorylate and activate its substrate AMPK despite reduced protein levels, and this activity was effectively inhibited by 1NMPP1 (Fig. 1 D, lane 6 vs. 8).

Chemical genetics applied to embryonic explants

Although unable to generate a homozygous Lkb1MG mouse strain, we were able to study Lkb1 function under conditions that permitted more detailed cell biological analysis than is possible in vivo. We modified existing approaches to culturing embryonic organs to enable high resolution imaging, pharmacologic manipulation, and biochemical analysis ex vivo. We focused on lung and pancreas, organs that give rise to cancers where Lkb1 loss is relatively common (Sahin et al., 2003; Sanchez-Cespedes, 2007).

Tissues were harvested from Lkb1WT/WT and Lkb1MG/MG littermate embryos and explants were cultured at the air–media interface on polyester filters with either vehicle control (DMSO) or inhibitor (1NMPP1). Addition of 1 µM 1NMPP1 for 2 h led to an acute reduction in phospho-T172 AMPK in Lkb1MG/MG explant pancreata (Fig. 1 E, lanes 5–8), whereas no such reduction was observed for Lkb1WT/WT explants (Fig. 1 E, lanes 1–4). The reduction in phospho-T172 levels reflected an actual reduction in AMPK activity given the concomitant decrease in phosphorylation of the AMPK target acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC; Fig. 1 E). As had been observed in the MEFs, reduced steady-state levels of Lkb1MG protein were also seen in the explant lysates, and incubations (>16 h) with 1NMPP1 led to stabilization of Lkb1MG (unpublished data).

Inhibition of Lkb1 kinase activity results in branching defects in embryonic lung

Whole lung organ cultures from Lkb1WT/WT embryos at E12.5 continued to grow and undergo highly stereotypic branching morphogenesis (Metzger et al., 2008) in a fashion that was unaffected by the presence of 1NMPP1 (Fig. 2 A, top). Lkb1MG/MG lung explants also continued to grow in the presence of inhibitor; however, they displayed defects in branching and bud septation, resulting in significantly increased terminal bud width and smaller overall size by 1–2 d in vitro (DIV; Fig. 2 A, bottom; and see Fig. S5 A for quantitation of bud widths).

Figure 2.
Inhibition of Lkb1 in the lung results in abnormal branching but not polarity defects. (A) E12.5 lung explants were cultured on transwell filters for 2 DIV with 1 µM 1NMPP1. Branches derived from a single bud are pseudocolored. (B) 1NMPP1-treated ...

To determine if alterations in morphogenesis reflected an underlying disruption of epithelial cell polarity, we fixed and stained lung explants with several apical, basal, and junctional markers. Confocal microscopy of explants showed that regardless of genotype or drug treatment, lung epithelia showed normal distributions of E-cadherin and Mucin1 (Muc-1) (Fig. 2 B). Additionally, apical distribution of aPKC, tight junction marker ZO-1, and basolateral distribution of β-catenin were unchanged after Lkb1 inhibition (unpublished data). Thus, inhibition of Lkb1 kinase activity resulted in defective lung branching morphogenesis without a significant disruption in epithelial apical-basal polarity.

Because conditional Cre-mediated deletions of Lkb1 in the intestine have suggested roles for Lkb1 signaling in both epithelial and mesenchymal cells (Katajisto et al., 2008), we next asked if the defect in branching morphogenesis was epithelial cell autonomous. Portions of lung epithelia were stripped of mesenchyme and embedded in Matrigel (Nogawa and Ito, 1995). In the presence and absence of 1NMPP1, isolated E12.5 Lkb1WT/WT epithelium displayed extensive growth and budding in response to exogenous growth factors such as FGF1 or FGF7 (Fig. 2 C, top). Isolated E12.5 Lkb1MG/MG epithelium cultured in the presence of 1NMPP1, however, generated large sacs and flat sheets of epithelium (Fig. 2 C, bottom), consistent with the defective branching seen in Lkb1-inhibited whole lung explants. Again, localization of apical and basal polarity markers was unaffected (Fig. 2 D). The effect of Lkb1 kinase inhibition on lung morphogenesis was consistent with an epithelial cell-autonomous phenotype.

The mesenchyme-free isolated epithelium experiments required the addition of exogenous growth factors that are normally supplied by the mesenchyme (Cardoso et al., 1997), raising the possibility that mesenchymally derived signals may be defective. To assess this possibility, epithelium/mesenchyme complementation experiments were performed. Explants of distal epithelium from Lkb1WT/WT or Lkb1MG/MG lungs were isolated and transferred to Matrigel. A reserved portion of distal Lkb1WT/WT or Lkb1MG/MG mesenchymal tissue was then positioned in direct contact with the epithelium, and the co-cultures were fed with media containing 1NMPP1. In the absence of added growth factors, both Lkb1MG/MG and Lkb1WT/WT mesenchyme were equally effective in supporting normal growth and branch development in Lkb1WT/WT epithelium (Fig. 2 E). Conversely, Lkb1WT/WT mesenchyme failed to restore normal development to Lkb1MG/MG epithelium in the presence of 1NMPP1. The fact that the branching phenotype always reflected the genotype of the epithelium provided strong evidence that Lkb1 controlled lung morphogenesis in an epithelial cell-autonomous fashion.

Inhibition of Lkb1 kinase activity results in cyst formation in late but not early stage pancreas explants

The pancreas, like the lung, undergoes branching morphogenesis during development. However, its developmental program is less stereotyped and involves the formation of a multi-lumen plexus that coordinately extends and remodels into a single lumen ductal system (Villasenor et al., 2010). We followed the growth and branching of E12.5 embryonic pancreata from Lkb1WT/WT and Lkb1MG/MG mice harboring a Pdx1-GFP reporter (Holland et al., 2006; Puri and Hebrok, 2007) to highlight the developing pancreatic endoderm (Fig. 3 A). After growth in the presence or absence of 1NMPP1, we fixed and stained explants with epithelial markers to examine the pattern of branching with confocal microscopy (Fig. 3 B). Lkb1 inhibition did not markedly perturb the pattern of growth or branching morphogenesis (in contrast to the lung) or the polarity of individual epithelial cells in these early stage pancreata, even after culturing for 3 DIV.

Figure 3.
Inhibition of Lkb1 results in pancreatic cystic neoplasias but not polarity defects. (A) Lkb1WT/WT (top) and Lkb1MG/MG (bottom) E12.5 pancreatic explants were cultured on transwell filters for 3 DIV with 1 µM 1NMPP1. General pattern of growth ...

In pancreata harvested from later stage embryos (E16.5), however, inhibition of Lkb1 kinase activity resulted in a dramatic alteration in tissue architecture. Lkb1WT/WT and Lkb1MG/MG explants from E16.5 littermate embryos were treated with 1 µM 1NMPP1 for 3 d. As shown in Fig. 3 C (left), phase-contrast microscopy revealed that clusters of developing acinar structures in the Lkb1WT/WT explant had been largely replaced by multiple cyst-like structures in the Lkb1MG/MG explant. Hematoxylin-eosin–stained sections indicated the cysts were lined by a monolayer of epithelial cells (Fig. 3 C, middle) and fluorescence images of pancreata expressing Pdx1-GFP confirmed that these cells expressed Pdx1, a marker of the pancreatic endoderm (Fig. 3 C, right). These results showed that inhibition of Lkb1 in late stage pancreata results in a neoplasia where acinar structures are replaced by endodermally derived cystic structures.

Cysts induced by Lkb1 inhibition resembled pancreatic cystic neoplasias that develop in a Pdx1-Cre–driven Lkb1 deletion mouse model in which modest apical-basal polarity defects were reported in the pancreatic epithelium in vivo (Hezel et al., 2008). However, in whole-mount E16.5 Lkb1MG/MG explants treated with 1NMPP1, no alterations in the distribution of ZO-1, E-cadherin, or Muc-1 were detected as compared with wild-type tissues (Fig. 3 D). In particular, in regions exhibiting cyst formation, E-cadherin staining was normal and the pattern of ZO-1 outlined a morphologically continuous network of tight junctions (Fig. 3 E). The high resolution immunofluorescence imaging made possible by whole-mount preparations demonstrated that although Lkb1 inhibition results in dramatic cyst formation in late stage pancreata, the neoplasias were not associated with alterations in apical-basal polarity.

Pancreatic cysts are dynamic

The rapid rate of cyst formation suggested that the cysts might be dynamic structures. Epithelial cells lining the cysts showed enlargement of the apical domain and a flattened morphology suggestive of tension derived from fluid accumulation. Fluorescence time-lapse microscopy of live Lkb1MG/MG pancreata cultured from Pdx1-GFP transgenic embryos treated with 1NMPP1 demonstrated that cyst formation was a highly dynamic biphasic process. In the first phase (24–48 h after addition of 1NMPP1), cysts typically exhibited several cycles of rapid growth and contraction, suggesting that fluid shifts were highly dynamic rather than a gradual and steady accumulation of fluid (Video 1). In the second phase (48–72 h), cysts that reached some threshold size either continued to grow slowly or to stabilize, suggesting an equilibrium had been reached. Importantly, this cystic phenotype was never observed in explants from wild-type mice treated with 1NMPP1 (see Table S3 for quantification of cystic phenotype).

To assess the cellular basis for these dynamic changes, we collected confocal z-stacks every 8–12 h after Lkb1 inhibition. As shown in Fig. 4 A, cysts arising in the distal ductal compartment connected clusters of differentiating acinar structures (white arrows). At early time points cysts were small and the acinar structures remained largely intact. This suggested that during cyst initiation acinar to ductal transdifferentiation plays a relatively minor role in contrast to what has been inferred from static images examined by conventional histology (Hezel et al., 2008). Only when the cysts fully enlarged did cells that originally comprised acinar structures become incorporated into the wall of an adjacent cyst (Fig. 4 A, yellow arrows). The eventual loss of acinar structures thus appeared largely to be caused by these incorporation events as opposed to death or de-differentiation of developing acinar cells because activated caspase-3 staining and sytox fluorescence imaging did not show increased cell death in 1NMPP1-treated Lkb1MG/MG explants (Fig. S2).

Figure 4.
Pancreatic cyst formation is dynamic and accompanied by increased cell proliferation. (A) Time-lapse imaging of pancreatic cyst development. Serial images over 72 h of an E16.5 Lkb1MG/MG explant expressing Pdx1-GFP treated with 1 µM 1NMPP1. Cyst ...

Increased epithelial cell proliferation also accompanies the growth of pancreatic cysts

Given that Lkb1 has been shown to be a negative regulator of cell cycle entry (Zeng and Berger, 2006), we asked if increased cellular proliferation might contribute to enlargement of pancreatic cysts. In 1NMPP1-treated E16.5 Lkb1MG/MG explants, 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU) labeling showed that a higher proportion of the epithelial cells lining cysts were actively proliferating relative to controls (Fig. 4 B). Using flow cytometry analysis of E16.5 Lkb1WT/WT and Lkb1MG/MG explants treated with 1NMPP1 for 3 d and then incubated with a 2-h pulse of EdU, EpCAM-positive cells from the Lkb1MG/MG explants were found to exhibit a significant increase in the EdU-positive population (Fig. 4 C, Fig. S5 B, and Table S1). Notably, experiments with heterozygous Lkb1WT/MG explants treated with 1NMPP1 did not show an increase in EdU incorporation, suggesting haploinsufficiency of Lkb1 was not sufficient for the effect on proliferation.

Lung morphogenesis defects depend on AMPK, whereas pancreatic cyst formation occurs independently of AMPK

Although it is well established that Lkb1 phosphorylates and activates AMPK, Lkb1 can phosphorylate other targets (Lizcano et al., 2004). Moreover, the Thr172 in the activation loop of AMPK phosphorylated by LKB1 can also be acted on by other kinases such as CaMKK and TAK1. Therefore, the finding that 1NMPP1 treatment decreased AMPK phosphorylation in Lkb1MG/MG explants (Fig. 1 E) did not necessarily implicate AMPK in the development of pancreatic cystic neoplasias or lung branching defects. To assess the role of the Lkb1–AMPK pathway in the embryonic explants, we used the accessibility of the ex vivo culture system in experiments using a direct allosteric activator of AMPK, A-769662 (Göransson et al., 2007; Sanders et al., 2007). If the morphogenesis defects were a result of inhibition of the Lkb1–AMPK pathway, activation of AMPK by A-769662 would bypass the inhibition of Lkb1 and suppress the formation of pancreatic cysts and lung branching defects. This approach was validated by control experiments using Lkb1MG/MG MEFs; the decrease in ATP levels induced by 1NMPP1-mediated inhibition of Lkb1 could be fully reversed by the addition of A-769662 (Fig. 5 A).

Figure 5.
Lung morphogenesis effects are AMPK dependent, whereas pancreatic cyst formation is AMPK independent. (A) Lkb1WT/WT (WT) and Lkb1MG/MG (MG) MEFs were seeded into 96-well plates with DMSO or 1 µM 1NMPP1 or 1 µM 1NMPP1 and 100 µM ...

In lung explants, A-769662 suppressed branching defects induced by Lkb1 inhibition. Addition of A-769662 to Lkb1WT/WT mesenchyme-free lung explant cultures had no effect on growth or bud formation (Fig. 5 B, left), indicating that A-769662 had no significant toxic or off-target effects. When A-769662 was added to Lkb1MG/MG explants, however, the large sacs and flattened sheets of epithelium induced by 1NMPP1 instead developed as numerous small buds of epithelium highly reminiscent of controls (Fig. 5 B, right). The wild-type branching phenotype thus appeared to be largely rescued by A-769662 in the Lkb1MG/MG explants, suggesting that Lkb1 signaling via AMPK controls morphogenesis in the lung (Table S2).

In contrast, A-769662 treatment was unable to suppress cyst formation in pancreatic explants (Fig. 5 C). Moreover, the increased rate of EdU incorporation in epithelial cells lining cystic structures was unaltered by A-769662 (unpublished data). The failure of A-769662 to complement the defect was not a result of its inability to activate AMPK because the activator was effective at restoring or enhancing the phosphorylation of two AMPK substrates (ACC and Raptor; Fig. 5 D, lanes 7 and 8). Neither 1NMPP1 nor A-769662 had much effect on Lkb1WT/WT tissues. These results demonstrate that although A-769662 was capable of rescuing Lkb1-AMPK signaling in mutant explants, it was not able to rescue the morphogenesis defect in pancreas. Consistent with cyst formation being AMPK independent, direct inhibition of AMPK with compound C had no effect on embryonic pancreata (unpublished data). Thus, the Lkb1 kinase controls developmental morphogenesis in the lung and in the pancreas by distinct signaling pathways.

Pancreatic cysts induced by Lkb1 inhibition evolve into structures that resemble precancerous lesions

Given Lkb1’s role as a tumor suppressor, we next asked if the pancreatic cysts might evolve into precancerous lesions such as pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs; Hruban et al., 2001). Lkb1MG/MG explants were treated continuously for extended periods with 1NMPP1. Cysts did not grow indefinitely and between 5 and 7 d they began to collapse inwardly, leading to accumulation of highly invaginated epithelial structures (Fig. 6 A) and an increase in the overall size of the explants with increased Ki67 staining and EdU incorporation (Fig. S3, A and B). Control explants (Lkb1WT/WT and Lkb1WT/MG) exhibited slower growth and a more stereotypic pancreatic organization with acini and interconnecting tubules (Fig. 6 B). The collapsed epithelial structures exhibited features seen in PanIN lesions: tall columnar epithelial cells, extensive pseudostratification, papillary structures, luminal necrosis, nuclear crowding, and elongation, as well as overexpression of CD44v6 (Kure et al., 2012), an established marker of precancerous lesions that could be detected by both immunofluorescence and Western blot (Fig. 6 C). Strikingly, although these epithelial structures represented a significant departure from normal tissue architecture, cells comprising them retained intrinsic apical-basal polarity. EpCAM retained its basolateral distribution (Fig. 6 A) and Muc-1 remained apical, whereas ZO-1 staining illustrated a morphologically intact network of tight junctions (Fig. S3 C). Furthermore, despite the pseudostratification, the majority of the nuclei were basally positioned and mitotic figures (when observed) exhibited cell division parallel to the basement membrane. Thus, epithelial structures resulting from Lkb1 inhibition histologically resemble early stage PanINs that have not yet developed the widespread loss of polarity that characterizes late stage PanIN lesions (Hruban et al., 2006).

Figure 6.
Pancreatic cysts induced by Lkb1 inhibition evolve into structures that resemble precancerous PanIN lesions. (A) E16.5 pancreatic explants were cultured on transwell filters for 8 DIV with 1 µM 1NMPP1. Lkb1MG/MG explants developed cysts that then ...

Because oncogenic K-Ras has been found in a large proportion of PanINs and is a major driver of progression to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Hingorani et al., 2003; Löhr et al., 2005), we introduced a mutant K-Ras allele to test whether this combination of oncogene and tumor suppressor loss would further impact cellular polarity and/or tissue organization. We produced Lkb1MG/MG embryos heterozygous for the lox.stop.lox KrasG12D allele. Pancreatic explants were infected with AAV.Cre.IRES.GFP to activate expression of KrasG12D. As shown in Fig. 7 A, a mosaic pattern of GFP expression was seen in an Lkb1MG/MGKrasLSL.G12D/WT explant cultured with 1NMPP1 2 d after AAV infection. Comparison of GFP-positive and -negative cells with respect to morphology and polarity markers suggested that even acute activation of KrasG12D together with Lkb1 inhibition was still insufficient to drive a significant loss of intrinsic cell polarity. Experiments culturing explants 4 d after adeno-associated virus (AAV) infection showed similar cyst development as uninfected controls, again without overt loss of polarity. Similar results were found for explants expressing KrasG12D with wild-type Lkb1 (unpublished data).

Figure 7.
Expression of mutant K-Ras with Lkb1 inhibition or p16p19 loss in embryonic pancreas cultured ex vivo. (A) Pancreatic explants were harvested from E14.5 Lkb1MG/MG embryos that were heterozygous for lox.stop.lox KrasG12D, infected in vitro with AAV.Cre.IRES.GFP, ...

Although the combined actions of oncogenic K-Ras and Lkb1 inhibition were insufficient to acutely disrupt polarity or induce an invasive phenotype, we asked if substituting Lkb1 with the loss of a different tumor suppressor would result in similar findings. We examined pancreatic explants in which the p16p19 locus (containing the tumor suppressors Ink4A and Arf) was deleted because mutations in this region are also commonly found in both PanINs and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Hingorani et al., 2003; Abe et al., 2007). Although E14.5 pancreata from p16p19−/− and KrasG12D/WTp16p19−/− were initially indistinguishable from each other (and wild-type pancreata), after culturing as explants for 5 d, the KrasG12D/WTp16p19−/− explants exhibited regions with irregular branching that appeared to coincide with increased proliferation as indicated by EdU incorporation (Fig. 7 B and Fig. S4 A). Over the next 2–4 d these regions demonstrated increasingly disrupted architecture that included luminal dilations that were, however, smaller and less dramatic than the cysts seen with Lkb1 inhibition. As with the epithelial structures induced by Lkb1 inhibition, tissue disorganization seen in KrasG12D/WTp16p19−/− explants was characterized by pseudostratification, nuclear crowding, and elongation (Figs. 7 C and S4 B). Therefore, as seen with Lkb1 inhibition, activation of mutant K-Ras together with loss of p16p19 led to changes in tissue architecture in pancreatic embryonic explants that phenotypically resembled precancerous lesions. Although the overall pattern of ZO-1 and Muc-1 staining was consistent with intact apical-basal polarity, E-cadherin mislocalization was observed in regions of the KrasG12D/WTp16p19−/− explants where tissue organization was most severely disrupted (Fig. 7 C, arrows).


By combining chemical genetics together with optimized methods for long-term culture of embryonic explants, we have begun to understand the mechanism of the tumor suppressor Lkb1 in the context of complex mammalian tissues. The accessibility of the explants makes it possible to conduct experiments with a temporal and spatial resolution normally possible only in cell lines while maintaining a physiologically relevant arrangement of multiple primary cell types within a native extracellular matrix. The approach with embryonic tissues complements and extends 3D culture systems (Leung and Brugge, 2012; Muthuswamy and Xue, 2012) and in vivo microscopy methodologies (Orth et al., 2011) and not only facilitates live cell imaging and genetic manipulation but also the use of specific small molecule inhibitors and agonists. Such agents could be used to compare the role of Lkb1 in different organ systems without complications caused by pharmacokinetic differences that limit in vivo studies. Although we concentrated on lung and pancreas, experiments with other tissues are possible and together would serve to conceptually extend the conditional Lkb1 knockout models that have been generated but only studied as end point assays in vivo.

Surprisingly, we found that Lkb1 kinase activity functions quite differently in the morphogenesis of different epithelial tissues. In the lung, we have defined a role for Lkb1 in branching morphogenesis that is epithelial cell autonomous. In contrast, Lkb1 inhibition in early stage pancreatic explants did not impact the branching and remodeling of the developing ductal plexus. Only at the later stages of pancreatic development did Lkb1 inhibition lead to a significant tissue defect characterized by epithelial cysts. Live imaging experiments revealed that cyst formation began with a rapid dilatation of the distal ductal compartment, suggesting that Lkb1 is involved in the stabilization of tissue architecture and possibly fluid flow, as opposed to regulating branching morphogenesis. Even more striking was the observation that only the lung branching defect appeared to be AMPK mediated, whereas the pancreas cyst formation is AMPK independent. This finding has now made it clear that targets beyond AMPK must be more seriously considered to understand the function of Lkb1 in morphogenesis and cancer. We are actively working to identify relevant Lkb1 targets using the ex vivo approach.

Given the previous connections between Lkb1 and cell polarity observed in various model organisms and cancer cell lines (Watts et al., 2000; Martin and St Johnston, 2003; Baas et al., 2004; Amin et al., 2009), we focused on determining whether disruption in intrinsic epithelial cell polarity preceded or accompanied the morphogenesis defects induced by Lkb1 inhibition. Contrary to expectations, for both lung and pancreas, our experiments consistently demonstrated that the steady-state distributions of various apical-basal polarity markers were unaffected by acute or longer-term inhibition of Lkb1 kinase activity. Similarly, Lkb1 deficiency in a zebrafish developmental model did not demonstrate polarity defects in either gut or eye (van der Velden et al., 2011), and conditional deletions of Lkb1 in mouse intestine (Shorning et al., 2009) and endometrium (Contreras et al., 2008) led to no obvious disruption in epithelial polarity. Other studies examining loss of Lkb1 in breast (McCarthy et al., 2009; Partanen et al., 2012), prostate (Pearson et al., 2008), and liver (Fu et al., 2011; Woods et al., 2011) have observed modest alterations in epithelial polarity, suggesting that tissue context modulates Lkb1 function.

Comparing the pancreatic cysts induced by Lkb1 inhibition and the cystic neoplasias that develop in the Pdx1-Cre–driven Lkb1 deletion mouse model (Hezel et al., 2008), although there is general agreement, we note some important differences between the two systems. Although Pdx1-Cre drives recombination in early pancreatic progenitors, the cysts in the conditional deletion model did not arise during embryogenesis but rather in the neonatal period. In contrast, we have shown that cyst induction by Lkb1 inhibition occurs in late but not early stage embryonic explants. In fact, by systematically harvesting explants at various developmental stages, we have found that cyst formation coincides with the secondary transition, a wave of differentiation that begins around E14.5 (Villasenor et al., 2010). One possible explanation for this difference may relate to the acute and uniform nature of small molecule inhibition minimizing the chances for compensatory adaptations. Alternatively, the explant culture system may have introduced a factor that is permissive for cyst formation. In either event, the fundamental similarity of the two cystic phenotypes is impressive and strongly validates the chemical genetic approach to studying Lkb1.

Although the pancreatic explants examined here demonstrate intact apical-basal polarity in the face of Lkb1 inhibition, some junctional complex lateralization was reported for the conditional knockout (Hezel et al., 2008). This discrepancy may be the result of a small amount residual kinase activity from incomplete inhibition by 1NMPP1 or the possibility that Lkb1 may play a role in maintaining polarity independent of its kinase activity, perhaps as a scaffold for junctional components. In either case, the conclusion remains that pancreatic cysts induced from Lkb1 loss do not appear to reflect a defect in polarity. Moreover, as seen for Drosophila melanogaster (Lee et al., 2007; Mirouse et al., 2007), Lkb1 inactivation can render a tissue more susceptible to energy deprivation and this susceptibility may manifest as a partial alteration of cell organization as a secondary effect.

Although it is well established that Lkb1 is a tumor suppressor that participates in the pathogenesis of a wide range of cancers, the mechanism underlying this function remains poorly understood. We found that the pancreatic cysts induced by Lkb1 inhibition evolved into epithelial structures that resemble PanINs, the canonical precancerous lesions of the pancreas, based both on histological analysis and the expression of cancer-associated genes such as CD44. This suggests that for pancreas, Lkb1 has an important role suppressing early oncogenesis. We were thus led to ask whether Lkb1 inhibition can be combined with oncogene activation to further induce loss of polarity, invasiveness, or appearance of cancerous lesions in the embryonic explants. In several mouse tumor models, loss of Lkb1 clearly synergizes with mutant K-Ras to produce cancer (Ji et al., 2007; Morton et al., 2010). We therefore analyzed embryonic explants in which mutant endogenous K-Ras was activated together with Lkb1 inhibition but found no acute effects on polarity, cell shape, or migration, suggesting that additional genetic or epigenetic changes are required for transformation. For comparison, we examined the combination of mutant endogenous K-Ras with Ink4A/Arf (p16/p19) loss and found that despite a significant disruption of tissue architecture there was still no significant loss of polarity. Collectively, these results suggest that tissue architecture, even one that has undergone significant disorganization and metaplasia, is still able to resist, at least acutely, transformation by mutant K-Ras and loss of a single tumor suppressor. Only with additional “hits” are cells able to break free of the constraints imposed by the tissue and demonstrate the loss of polarity seen in carcinomas (Muthuswamy and Xue, 2012). The explant system now provides a unique approach to reconstructing the individual events that accompany the initiation of cancerous lesions.

To summarize, we have demonstrated that embryonic explants can be used to study the effects of tumor suppressors and oncogenes on the organization of complex mammalian tissues. Although carcinogenesis arises in adult tissues and not embryonic systems, the approach will be a valuable bridge between the observations made in cell lines with those made in animal models by providing a tissue platform that enables the visualization and detailed analysis of cell biological and genetic changes in tissues and single cells that are relevant to tumor initiation and transformation.

Materials and methods

Lkb1 vector construction

The construct for targeting the C57BL/6 Stk11 locus was made using recombineering (Warming et al., 2005), DNA synthesis, and standard molecular cloning techniques. After retrieving a genomic fragment containing Lkb1 from a C57BL/6 BAC (RP23 library) into pBlight-TK, the sequence 5′-GTGATGGAGTACTGCGTA-3′ within exon 3 was replaced with 5′-GTTGGGGAATATTGCGTA-3′ to change Met129 to a glycine and replace a ScaI with an SspI site. A neomycin cassette flanked by loxp was then introduced into intron2. The final vector was confirmed by DNA sequencing and linearized. C57BL/6 C2 embryonic stem cells were targeted with standard methods and positive clones were transfected with Cre to remove the neomycin cassette. The modified embryonic stem cells were then injected into blastocysts and germline transmission was obtained by crossing the chimeras with C57BL/6 females.

Mouse strains

In addition to creating the Lkb1MG mouse, we used the following mouse strains: KrasLSL−G12D from T. Jacks (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA), p16/p19fl/fl from A. Berns (Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands), Pdx1-Cre from A. Lowy (University of Ohio, Athens, OH), and Pdx1-GFP from Edouard Stanley (Monash University, Clayton, Australia). Animals were housed and cared for according to guidelines from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Genentech.

Embryonic explant culture

Pancreas and individual lobes of the lungs were dissected from embryos harvested from time pregnancy setups. Embryonic explants were cultured on 0.4-µm polyester transwells (Corning) at the air–liquid interface in DMEM with 10% FCS, glutamine, and pen-strep. For longer-term cultures (>3 d), media was changed daily.

For mesenchyme-free cultures, lungs were dissected and incubated in Collagenase/Dispase (1 mg/ml for each) for 5–10 min at room temperature. Epithelial tissue was removed by mechanical dissection, transferred to transwells, and covered with 5–10 µl of 1:1 Matrigel/DME. After Matrigel was solidified, 400 µl of media (DMEM, 10% FCS, glutamine, pen-strep, and 200 ng/ml FGF7 or FGF1 [Invitrogen]) was added to top and bottom wells. In epithelium-mesenchyme transplant experiments, mesenchyme was positioned in contact with epithelial explants after addition of Matrigel and FGF was omitted from the culture media.

AAV infection

AAV8.2-Cre-IRES-GFP and control AAV8.2 GFP virus (Virovek) in a 10–20-µl volume of serum-free media was added directly to explants in the transwell plates. The explants were fixed at various time points after infection and then stained with anti-GFP antibody together with other primary antibodies.

Whole-mount immunofluorescence

Embryonic explants were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in PBS with 2% BSA, 0.1% saponin, or 0.1% Triton X-100. After staining with primary antibodies and fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies, explants were mounted and imaged with a laser confocal microscope (SP5; Leica) with integrated photomultiplier detectors. Objective lenses were a 40×, 1.25 NA, HCX PL APO oil immersion objective or a 63×, 1.40 NA, HCX PL APO oil immersion objective. Images shown are representative of multiple independent experiments (n ≥ 5) with littermate explants that were cultured, stained, and imaged under identical conditions and settings.

Live imaging

Explants cultured on the transwell filters could be directly imaged using conventional phase and fluorescence microscopy. For time-lapse confocal imaging on the SP5, filters with attached pancreatic explants were removed from the plastic support, inverted, and placed in a WillCo glass bottom dish containing media. In between image acquisitions the pancreatic explants were returned to a transwell for culturing at the air–liquid interface. For continuous live imaging (Video 1) of multiple explants in parallel within a transwell plate, we used an Eclipse Ti-E with Perfect Focus hardware autofocus (Nikon), 10× Plan Flour 0.3 NA phase-contrast objective, Revolution DSD white light spinning disk confocal (Andor Technology), Prior LumenPRO 200W metal halide illumination system (Prior Scientific), Clara charge-coupled device camera (1,392 × 1,024, 6.45 µm pixels; Andor Technology), and IQ2 software (Andor Technology). Temperature, humidity, and CO2 control was provided by an environmental chamber (Okolab). Video 1 is representative of multiple independent experiments (n ≥ 3).


Antibodies used were anti-E-cadherin (DECMA-1 [Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.]; clone 36/E-cadherin [BD]); anti-ZO-1 (R40.76; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.); anti–Muc-1 (rabbit polyclonal; Abcam); anti-EpCAM (G8.8; BioLegend); anti-Phospho-ACC(Ser79) (rabbit polyclonal; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-ACC (C83B10; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Phospho-AMPKα(Thr172) (40H9; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-AMPKα (23A3; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Lkb1 (D60C5; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Phospho-Raptor(Ser792) (rabbit polyclonal; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Phospho-S6(Ser235/236) (D57.2.2E; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-eIF4E (rabbit polyclonal; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CD44 (IM7; BioLegend), anti-CD44v6 (9A4; AbD Serotec), anti-Ki67 (B56; BD), anti–active caspase-3 (rabbit polyclonal; Promega), anti-gp135 (G. Ojakian, State University of New York, Brooklyn, NY), anti-gp58 (hybridoma from American Type Culture Collection), anti-GFP (Invitrogen), anti–actin-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), various Alexa Fluor–conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen), and various HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare). Other reagents used were: Alexa Fluor phalloidin (Invitrogen), DAPI (Cell Signaling Technology), Click-iT EdU Alexa Fluor kit (Invitrogen), SYTOX Orange Nucleic Acid Stain (Life technologies), AICAR (Cell Signaling Technology), A-769662 (Tocris Bioscience), 1NMPP1 (EMD Millipore), 1NaPP1 (provided by the Shokat laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA).

Cell culture

MDCK II cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s MEM with low glucose supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM l-glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin at 37°C, and 5% CO2. For the monolayer experiments, cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 105 for each 12-mm 0.4-µm polyester filter. For the spheroid experiments, 45 µl of a 1:1 mixture of 104 cells in media to Matrigel (9–10 mg/ml; BD) was added to each well of a 96-well plate, incubated 30–45 min at 37°C, and then 100 µl of media was added to each well.

Primary MEFs were prepared from E12.5–13.5 embryos and were maintained in Dulbecco’s MEM with high glucose supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM l-glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin at 37°C, and 5% CO2.

Lkb1 knockdown with shRNA

Oligonucleotides targeting the sequence 5′-GGGACAACATCTACAAGTTGT-3′ in Lkb1 mRNA were synthesized, annealed, and ligated to the LTRH1-puro retroviral vector. Retrovirus was produced in GP2-293 cells and MDCK cells were infected and selected in puromycin as previously described (Francis et al., 2011).

Flow cytometry

After digesting explants in Trypsin EDTA for 30–40 min, cells were stained with anti-EpCAM antibody on ice, PFA fixed, and processed for EdU labeling (Click-iT EdU Alexa Fluor kit), and then analyzed on a Canto-II (BD). Experiment shown is representative of multiple independent experiments (n = 5).

Western blot

Protein concentrations of tissue and cell lysates were determined by BCA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples in LDS sample buffer plus β-mercaptoethanol were heated to 95°C for 5 min before separation by electrophoresis using NuPAGE 4–12% Bis Tris gels (Invitrogen). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes overnight, membranes were blocked in TBS buffer with 0.1% Tween and 5% Blotto before incubating overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies in TBS buffer with 0.1% Tween and 2% BSA. Primary antibodies were detected with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and ECL reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Experiments shown are representative of multiple independent experiments (n ≥ 3).

Online supplemental material

Fig. S1 shows biochemical and RT-PCR characterization of the Lkb1 ASKA allele in cell lines. Fig. S2 shows that Lkb1 inhibition did not result in increased cell death in pancreatic explants. Fig. S3 shows that Lkb1 inhibition results in increased proliferation in the PanIN-like lesions without loss of apical-basal polarity. Fig. S4 shows that mutant K-Ras together with loss of p16/p19 increases cell proliferation and induces disruptions in tissue architecture in pancreatic explants. Fig. S5 shows quantification of morphogenesis defect in lung explants and proliferation in pancreas explants induced by Lkb1 inhibition. Video 1 shows fluorescence time-lapse imaging of pancreatic cyst formation. Table S1 summarizes the FACS experiments examining EdU-positive cells in pancreatic explants. Table S2 summarizes the mesenchyme-free lung epithelial culture experiments. Table S3 shows quantification of cyst number and size in pancreatic explants. Online supplemental material is available at

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material:


We would like to thank members of the Mellman laboratory for their support and useful discussions, Fred de Sauvage for helpful comments on the manuscript, Soren Warming for advice on construct generation, Meron Roose-Girma and Embryonic Stem Cell facility for generating the knockin mouse, and all the dedicated staff in the Genentech genotyping and animal facility for their expert support.

All authors are employees of Genentech, a member of the Roche group.


Abbreviations used in this paper:

adeno-associated virus
AMP-activated kinase
analogue-sensitive kinase allele
days in vitro
embryonic day
mouse embryonic fibroblast
pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome


  • Abe K., Suda K., Arakawa A., Yamasaki S., Sonoue H., Mitani K., Nobukawa B. 2007. Different patterns of p16INK4A and p53 protein expressions in intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Pancreas. 34:85–91 10.1097/01.mpa.0000240608.56806.0a [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Alessi D.R., Sakamoto K., Bayascas J.R. 2006. LKB1-dependent signaling pathways. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75:137–163 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142702 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Amin N., Khan A., St Johnston D., Tomlinson I., Martin S., Brenman J., McNeill H. 2009. LKB1 regulates polarity remodeling and adherens junction formation in the Drosophila eye. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106:8941–8946 10.1073/pnas.0812469106 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Baas A.F., Kuipers J., van der Wel N.N., Batlle E., Koerten H.K., Peters P.J., Clevers H.C. 2004. Complete polarization of single intestinal epithelial cells upon activation of LKB1 by STRAD. Cell. 116:457–466 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00114-X [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bardeesy N., Sinha M., Hezel A.F., Signoretti S., Hathaway N.A., Sharpless N.E., Loda M., Carrasco D.R., DePinho R.A. 2002. Loss of the Lkb1 tumour suppressor provokes intestinal polyposis but resistance to transformation. Nature. 419:162–167 10.1038/nature01045 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Barnes A.P., Lilley B.N., Pan Y.A., Plummer L.J., Powell A.W., Raines A.N., Sanes J.R., Polleux F. 2007. LKB1 and SAD kinases define a pathway required for the polarization of cortical neurons. Cell. 129:549–563 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.025 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bishop A.C., Ubersax J.A., Petsch D.T., Matheos D.P., Gray N.S., Blethrow J., Shimizu E., Tsien J.Z., Schultz P.G., Rose M.D., et al. 2000. A chemical switch for inhibitor-sensitive alleles of any protein kinase. Nature. 407:395–401 10.1038/35030148 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cardoso W.V., Itoh A., Nogawa H., Mason I., Brody J.S. 1997. FGF-1 and FGF-7 induce distinct patterns of growth and differentiation in embryonic lung epithelium. Dev. Dyn. 208:398–405 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199703)208:3<398::AID-AJA10>3.0.CO;2-X [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cheng H., Liu P., Wang Z.C., Zou L., Santiago S., Garbitt V., Gjoerup O.V., Iglehart J.D., Miron A., Richardson A.L., et al. 2009. SIK1 couples LKB1 to p53-dependent anoikis and suppresses metastasis. Sci. Signal. 2:ra35 10.1126/scisignal.2000369 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Contreras C.M., Gurumurthy S., Haynie J.M., Shirley L.J., Akbay E.A., Wingo S.N., Schorge J.O., Broaddus R.R., Wong K.K., Bardeesy N., Castrillon D.H. 2008. Loss of Lkb1 provokes highly invasive endometrial adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res. 68:759–766 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5014 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Francis S.S., Sfakianos J., Lo B., Mellman I. 2011. A hierarchy of signals regulates entry of membrane proteins into the ciliary membrane domain in epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 193:219–233 10.1083/jcb.201009001 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fu D., Wakabayashi Y., Lippincott-Schwartz J., Arias I.M. 2011. Bile acid stimulates hepatocyte polarization through a cAMP-Epac-MEK-LKB1-AMPK pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:1403–1408 10.1073/pnas.1018376108 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Göransson O., McBride A., Hawley S.A., Ross F.A., Shpiro N., Foretz M., Viollet B., Hardie D.G., Sakamoto K. 2007. Mechanism of action of A-769662, a valuable tool for activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 282:32549–32560 10.1074/jbc.M706536200 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hawley S.A., Boudeau J., Reid J.L., Mustard K.J., Udd L., Mäkelä T.P., Alessi D.R., Hardie D.G. 2003. Complexes between the LKB1 tumor suppressor, STRAD alpha/beta and MO25 alpha/beta are upstream kinases in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. J. Biol. 2:28 10.1186/1475-4924-2-28 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hearle N., Schumacher V., Menko F.H., Olschwang S., Boardman L.A., Gille J.J., Keller J.J., Westerman A.M., Scott R.J., Lim W., et al. 2006. Frequency and spectrum of cancers in the Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Clin. Cancer Res. 12:3209–3215 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0083 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hemminki A., Markie D., Tomlinson I., Avizienyte E., Roth S., Loukola A., Bignell G., Warren W., Aminoff M., Höglund P., et al. 1998. A serine/threonine kinase gene defective in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Nature. 391:184–187 10.1038/34432 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hezel A.F., Gurumurthy S., Granot Z., Swisa A., Chu G.C., Bailey G., Dor Y., Bardeesy N., Depinho R.A. 2008. Pancreatic LKB1 deletion leads to acinar polarity defects and cystic neoplasms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28:2414–2425 10.1128/MCB.01621-07 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hingorani S.R., Petricoin E.F., Maitra A., Rajapakse V., King C., Jacobetz M.A., Ross S., Conrads T.P., Veenstra T.D., Hitt B.A., et al. 2003. Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse. Cancer Cell. 4:437–450 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00309-X [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Holland A.M., Micallef S.J., Li X., Elefanty A.G., Stanley E.G. 2006. A mouse carrying the green fluorescent protein gene targeted to the Pdx1 locus facilitates the study of pancreas development and function. Genesis. 44:304–307 10.1002/dvg.20214 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hruban R.H., Adsay N.V., Albores-Saavedra J., Compton C., Garrett E.S., Goodman S.N., Kern S.E., Klimstra D.S., Klöppel G., Longnecker D.S., et al. 2001. Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a new nomenclature and classification system for pancreatic duct lesions. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 25:579–586 10.1097/00000478-200105000-00003 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hruban R.H., Adsay N.V., Albores-Saavedra J., Anver M.R., Biankin A.V., Boivin G.P., Furth E.E., Furukawa T., Klein A., Klimstra D.S., et al. 2006. Pathology of genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic exocrine cancer: consensus report and recommendations. Cancer Res. 66:95–106 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2168 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Huang X., Wullschleger S., Shpiro N., McGuire V.A., Sakamoto K., Woods Y.L., McBurnie W., Fleming S., Alessi D.R. 2008. Important role of the LKB1-AMPK pathway in suppressing tumorigenesis in PTEN-deficient mice. Biochem. J. 412:211–221 10.1042/BJ20080557 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jeghers H., McKusick V.A., Katz K.H. 1949. Generalized intestinal polyposis and melanin spots of the oral mucosa, lips and digits; a syndrome of diagnostic significance. N. Engl. J. Med. 241:1031–1036 10.1056/NEJM194912292412601 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jenne D.E., Reimann H., Nezu J., Friedel W., Loff S., Jeschke R., Müller O., Back W., Zimmer M. 1998. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is caused by mutations in a novel serine threonine kinase. Nat. Genet. 18:38–43 10.1038/ng0198-38 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ji H., Ramsey M.R., Hayes D.N., Fan C., McNamara K., Kozlowski P., Torrice C., Wu M.C., Shimamura T., Perera S.A., et al. 2007. LKB1 modulates lung cancer differentiation and metastasis. Nature. 448:807–810 10.1038/nature06030 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jishage K., Nezu J., Kawase Y., Iwata T., Watanabe M., Miyoshi A., Ose A., Habu K., Kake T., Kamada N., et al. 2002. Role of Lkb1, the causative gene of Peutz-Jegher’s syndrome, in embryogenesis and polyposis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:8903–8908 [PubMed]
  • Katajisto P., Vaahtomeri K., Ekman N., Ventelä E., Ristimäki A., Bardeesy N., Feil R., DePinho R.A., Mäkelä T.P. 2008. LKB1 signaling in mesenchymal cells required for suppression of gastrointestinal polyposis. Nat. Genet. 40:455–459 10.1038/ng.98 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kemphues K.J., Priess J.R., Morton D.G., Cheng N.S. 1988. Identification of genes required for cytoplasmic localization in early C. elegans embryos. Cell. 52:311–320 10.1016/S0092-8674(88)80024-2 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kure S., Matsuda Y., Hagio M., Ueda J., Naito Z., Ishiwata T. 2012. Expression of cancer stem cell markers in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Int. J. Oncol. 41:1314–1324 [PubMed]
  • Lee J.H., Koh H., Kim M., Kim Y., Lee S.Y., Karess R.E., Lee S.H., Shong M., Kim J.M., Kim J., Chung J. 2007. Energy-dependent regulation of cell structure by AMP-activated protein kinase. Nature. 447:1017–1020 10.1038/nature05828 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Leung C.T., Brugge J.S. 2012. Outgrowth of single oncogene-expressing cells from suppressive epithelial environments. Nature. 482:410–413 10.1038/nature10826 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lizcano J.M., Göransson O., Toth R., Deak M., Morrice N.A., Boudeau J., Hawley S.A., Udd L., Mäkelä T.P., Hardie D.G., Alessi D.R. 2004. LKB1 is a master kinase that activates 13 kinases of the AMPK subfamily, including MARK/PAR-1. EMBO J. 23:833–843 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600110 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Löhr M., Klöppel G., Maisonneuve P., Lowenfels A.B., Lüttges J. 2005. Frequency of K-ras mutations in pancreatic intraductal neoplasias associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Neoplasia. 7:17–23 10.1593/neo.04445 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Martin S.G., St Johnston D. 2003. A role for Drosophila LKB1 in anterior-posterior axis formation and epithelial polarity. Nature. 421:379–384 10.1038/nature01296 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • McCarthy A., Lord C.J., Savage K., Grigoriadis A., Smith D.P., Weigelt B., Reis-Filho J.S., Ashworth A. 2009. Conditional deletion of the Lkb1 gene in the mouse mammary gland induces tumour formation. J. Pathol. 219:306–316 10.1002/path.2599 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mehenni H., Resta N., Park J.G., Miyaki M., Guanti G., Costanza M.C. 2006. Cancer risks in LKB1 germline mutation carriers. Gut. 55:984–990 10.1136/gut.2005.082990 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Metzger R.J., Klein O.D., Martin G.R., Krasnow M.A. 2008. The branching programme of mouse lung development. Nature. 453:745–750 10.1038/nature07005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mirouse V., Swick L.L., Kazgan N., St Johnston D., Brenman J.E. 2007. LKB1 and AMPK maintain epithelial cell polarity under energetic stress. J. Cell Biol. 177:387–392 10.1083/jcb.200702053 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Miyoshi H., Nakau M., Ishikawa T.O., Seldin M.F., Oshima M., Taketo M.M. 2002. Gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyposis in Lkb1 heterozygous knockout mice. Cancer Res. 62:2261–2266 [PubMed]
  • Morton J.P., Jamieson N.B., Karim S.A., Athineos D., Ridgway R.A., Nixon C., McKay C.J., Carter R., Brunton V.G., Frame M.C., et al. 2010. LKB1 haploinsufficiency cooperates with Kras to promote pancreatic cancer through suppression of p21-dependent growth arrest. Gastroenterology. 139:586–597: 597: e1–e6 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.04.055 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Muthuswamy S.K., Xue B. 2012. Cell polarity as a regulator of cancer cell behavior plasticity. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28:599–625 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154244 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nogawa H., Ito T. 1995. Branching morphogenesis of embryonic mouse lung epithelium in mesenchyme-free culture. Development. 121:1015–1022 [PubMed]
  • Orth J.D., Kohler R.H., Foijer F., Sorger P.K., Weissleder R., Mitchison T.J. 2011. Analysis of mitosis and antimitotic drug responses in tumors by in vivo microscopy and single-cell pharmacodynamics. Cancer Res. 71:4608–4616 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0412 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Partanen J.I., Tervonen T.A., Myllynen M., Lind E., Imai M., Katajisto P., Dijkgraaf G.J., Kovanen P.E., Mäkelä T.P., Werb Z., Klefström J. 2012. Tumor suppressor function of Liver kinase B1 (Lkb1) is linked to regulation of epithelial integrity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:E388–E397 10.1073/pnas.1120421109 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pearson H.B., McCarthy A., Collins C.M., Ashworth A., Clarke A.R. 2008. Lkb1 deficiency causes prostate neoplasia in the mouse. Cancer Res. 68:2223–2232 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5169 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Puri S., Hebrok M. 2007. Dynamics of embryonic pancreas development using real-time imaging. Dev. Biol. 306:82–93 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.003 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rossi D.J., Ylikorkala A., Korsisaari N., Salovaara R., Luukko K., Launonen V., Henkemeyer M., Ristimaki A., Aaltonen L.A., Makela T.P. 2002. Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 in a mouse model of Peutz-Jeghers polyposis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:12327–12332 10.1073/pnas.192301399 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Saadat I., Higashi H., Obuse C., Umeda M., Murata-Kamiya N., Saito Y., Lu H., Ohnishi N., Azuma T., Suzuki A., et al. 2007. Helicobacter pylori CagA targets PAR1/MARK kinase to disrupt epithelial cell polarity. Nature. 447:330–333 10.1038/nature05765 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sahin F., Maitra A., Argani P., Sato N., Maehara N., Montgomery E., Goggins M., Hruban R.H., Su G.H. 2003. Loss of Stk11/Lkb1 expression in pancreatic and biliary neoplasms. Mod. Pathol. 16:686–691 10.1097/01.MP.0000075645.97329.86 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sanchez-Cespedes M. 2007. A role for LKB1 gene in human cancer beyond the Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Oncogene. 26:7825–7832 10.1038/sj.onc.1210594 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sanders M.J., Ali Z.S., Hegarty B.D., Heath R., Snowden M.A., Carling D. 2007. Defining the mechanism of activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by the small molecule A-769662, a member of the thienopyridone family. J. Biol. Chem. 282:32539–32548 10.1074/jbc.M706543200 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Shaw R.J., Kosmatka M., Bardeesy N., Hurley R.L., Witters L.A., DePinho R.A., Cantley L.C. 2004. The tumor suppressor LKB1 kinase directly activates AMP-activated kinase and regulates apoptosis in response to energy stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:3329–3335 10.1073/pnas.0308061100 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Shorning B.Y., Zabkiewicz J., McCarthy A., Pearson H.B., Winton D.J., Sansom O.J., Ashworth A., Clarke A.R. 2009. Lkb1 deficiency alters goblet and paneth cell differentiation in the small intestine. PLoS ONE. 4:e4264 10.1371/journal.pone.0004264 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • ten Klooster J.P., Jansen M., Yuan J., Oorschot V., Begthel H., Di Giacomo V., Colland F., de Koning J., Maurice M.M., Hornbeck P., Clevers H. 2009. Mst4 and Ezrin induce brush borders downstream of the Lkb1/Strad/Mo25 polarization complex. Dev. Cell. 16:551–562 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.01.016 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • van der Velden Y.U., Wang L., Zevenhoven J., van Rooijen E., van Lohuizen M., Giles R.H., Clevers H., Haramis A.P. 2011. The serine-threonine kinase LKB1 is essential for survival under energetic stress in zebrafish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:4358–4363 10.1073/pnas.1010210108 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Villasenor A., Chong D.C., Henkemeyer M., Cleaver O. 2010. Epithelial dynamics of pancreatic branching morphogenesis. Development. 137:4295–4305 10.1242/dev.052993 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Warming S., Costantino N., Court D.L., Jenkins N.A., Copeland N.G. 2005. Simple and highly efficient BAC recombineering using galK selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:e36 10.1093/nar/gni035 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Watts J.L., Morton D.G., Bestman J., Kemphues K.J. 2000. The C. elegans par-4 gene encodes a putative serine-threonine kinase required for establishing embryonic asymmetry. Development. 127:1467–1475 [PubMed]
  • Woods A., Heslegrave A.J., Muckett P.J., Levene A.P., Clements M., Mobberley M., Ryder T.A., Abu-Hayyeh S., Williamson C., Goldin R.D., et al. 2011. LKB1 is required for hepatic bile acid transport and canalicular membrane integrity in mice. Biochem. J. 434:49–60 10.1042/BJ20101721 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ylikorkala A., Rossi D.J., Korsisaari N., Luukko K., Alitalo K., Henkemeyer M., Mäkelä T.P. 2001. Vascular abnormalities and deregulation of VEGF in Lkb1-deficient mice. Science. 293:1323–1326 10.1126/science.1062074 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zagórska A., Deak M., Campbell D.G., Banerjee S., Hirano M., Aizawa S., Prescott A.R., Alessi D.R. 2010. New roles for the LKB1-NUAK pathway in controlling myosin phosphatase complexes and cell adhesion. Sci. Signal. 3:ra25 10.1126/scisignal.2000616 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zeng P.Y., Berger S.L. 2006. LKB1 is recruited to the p21/WAF1 promoter by p53 to mediate transcriptional activation. Cancer Res. 66:10701–10708 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0999 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang C., Kenski D.M., Paulson J.L., Bonshtien A., Sessa G., Cross J.V., Templeton D.J., Shokat K.M. 2005. A second-site suppressor strategy for chemical genetic analysis of diverse protein kinases. Nat. Methods. 2:435–441 10.1038/nmeth764 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang L., Li J., Young L.H., Caplan M.J. 2006. AMP-activated protein kinase regulates the assembly of epithelial tight junctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:17272–17277 10.1073/pnas.0608531103 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zheng B., Cantley L.C. 2007. Regulation of epithelial tight junction assembly and disassembly by AMP-activated protein kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:819–822 10.1073/pnas.0610157104 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press