The development of an adaptive immune response is required for the control and clearance of established RSV infections. Following infection, humans and cattle mount virus-specific antibody and T cell responses; however, these responses are weak and transient, as both species can be continuously re-infected throughout life. Clearance of RSV infection is primarily mediated by CD4 and CD8 αβ T cells. T cell responses are directed at epitopes within several RSV proteins including the N, M, NS2, M2-1, F and G [
55]. The F and G proteins are the major HLA class II restricted targets in both humans and cattle [
55,
56], with the F protein of hRSV being the most thoroughly studied and described to contain multiple antigenic regions [
57]. To our knowledge, there are currently no specific BoLA class II epitopes defined for bRSV in the bovine.
While important in anti-viral immunity, the RSV-specific CD4 T cell response is also thought to contribute to disease pathogenesis and damaging immunopathology [
58,
59,
60]. CD4 T cells, and the cytokines they produce, are key in shaping the nature of the adaptive virus-specific immune response. HRSV infection induces a mixed Th1 and Th2-type cytokine response [
61]. Production of IL-12 by dendritic cells, and early IFNγ is required for the priming of an effective Th1 type cytokine response; however, hRSV has been shown to interfere with dendritic cell cytokine production and their ability to initiate the development of a Th1 response [
56,
62,
63]. The ensuing Th2 polarized response leads to increased disease severity and lung injury, and is thought to block the development of an effective CD8 T cell response during both primary and secondary challenge [
56,
64,
65,
66]. Much of our understanding about the adaptive immune response to hRSV is derived from small rodent models; however, evidence from humans, while limited, suggests a similar mechanism of disease pathogenesis. Infants infected with hRSV exhibit Th2 polarization with increased IL-4 production in the lungs and the establishment of eosinophilia [
67,
68]. Interestingly, eosinophilia was also apparent in the lungs of infants that exhibited vaccine enhanced disease after receiving a formalin-inactivated hRSV vaccine (see section on RSV Vaccines). However, cytokine balance and the resulting disease outcome likely depends upon genetic background, as some infants have also been shown to contain significant numbers IFNγ-producing cells in the lungs, and these increased levels did not correlate to disease severity or outcome [
69].
Like humans, calves infected with bRSV develop a mixed cytokine response, but favor the development of a Th2-type immune response following infection. Studies of the cells and lymph fluid from bRSV infected calves reveal enhanced IL-4 and IL-13 production in the serum and tissues as early as day 4 post infection, and increased serum levels of virus-specific IgE, indicating the establishment of a Th2-type response [
70,
71,
72]. Calves also develop IFNγ producing cells and levels of the cytokine increase in the serum, but, as with humans, neither cell numbers nor IFNγ levels correlate with positive disease outcome [
73]. Evidence from humans has suggested that, due to the Th2 nature of the anti-viral immune response, hRSV infection may predispose children to the development of allergies and asthma later in life [
74,
75]. Interestingly, bRSV infection in calves has also been shown to predispose to allergic sensitization [
76,
77]. Gershwin
et al. demonstrated that exposure to the model allergen ovalbumin during bRSV infection resulted in significantly increased levels of IL-4, IL-13 and ovalbumin-specific IgE compared to uninfected control calves [
77].
Cytotoxic CD8 T cells play a critical role in the control and clearance of RSV infection. Infection of human infants results in a significant influx of activated CD8 T cells into the airways [
78], and calves infected with bRSV exhibit increased CD8 T cell infiltration in the lungs, trachea and nasopharynx [
79]. Depletion of CD8 T cells from mice [
59] or bRSV infected calves [
53] results in more severe disease and increased and sustained viral shedding compared to non-depleted control animals. In humans, the hRSV-specific HLA class I response is primarily targeted against the M2, F and N proteins [
80,
81,
82]. Bovine CD8 T cells target the M2, F, N and G proteins of bRSV [
83,
84]. Interestingly, while G-specific CD8 T cells are readily detectable in cattle, they have not been demonstrated in humans [
85]. It has been reported that the strong Th2 skewing that occurs during RSV infection acts to inhibit the development of an efficient CD8 T cell response and prevent the establishment of long-lived memory [
56]. Anecdotally, this is evidenced by the recurring infections that occur commonly in both humans and calves [
16,
18]. In the mouse model, hRSV-specific CTLs appear impaired in both cytokine secretion and cytotoxicity [
56,
86,
87], while calves infected with bRSV exhibit a similar phenotype, displaying limited bRSV-specific cytotoxicity during primary infections and impaired memory responses following challenge or vaccination [
88,
89].
Humoral immunity plays an important role in defending the host from RSV infection. While not fully effective, maternal antibodies may provide some level of protection from severe RSV infection in both humans [
90,
91,
92] and calves [
93]; however, their presence has also been described to suppress the development of antibody and T cell responses during acute infection [
94,
95]. Although humans initiate responses to several proteins of hRSV, only antibodies that are reactive to the major surface glycoproteins F and G appear to be important for protection [
96,
97]. The F protein is highly conserved and the majority of the F specific response is cross-reactive, making it more important for protection across hRSV strains [
98]. The G protein is more divergent, thus few antibodies cross-react between virus strains [
98,
99]. Further, the G-specific response is particularly inefficient and it has been proposed that this may be due to the secreted form of the G protein acting as a decoy for the host’s humoral response [
100,
101].
Like humans, calves mount antibody responses to several bRSV antigens, but the primary targets for protective humoral responses are the F, G and NP proteins [
84]. bRSV-specific IgM and IgA can be detected in the nasal secretions and serum of bRSV infected calves as early as 8 days post infection [
95]. BRSV-specific IgG2, the antibody isotype associated with a Th1 response, is not detected in the serum until 1-3 months post infection. As evidence of the cytokine skewing that occurs during RSV infection of calves, virus-specific IgG1, the isotype associated with a Th2 phenotype, is detectable in the serum starting at 13 days post infection [
95]. In a separate study, virus-specific IgE, another antibody associated with Th2 skewing and airway hyperresponsiveness, was detectable in the serum concurrent with the development of clinical signs [
71,
72].
In humans, both neutralizing IgG and IgA are thought to have a role in protection from RSV. IgA is important in local immunity, particularly in the upper airways and nasopharynx, while serum IgG plays a significant role in protection of the lower airways. Adults who have been repeatedly infected with hRSV develop sustained high levels of IgA in nasal secretions which has been shown to prevent virus replication in the upper airways, regardless of serum Ig levels [
102]. Further underlining the importance of both antibody types, passive immunization studies in rodents have shown that administration of neutralizing IgG provides complete protection from hRSV replication in the lungs, but not in nasal secretions [
103,
104,
105]. However, the IgA response is often transient and neutralizing IgM and serum IgG are likely more important for long-term protection [
94]. To date, the only licensed therapy available for hRSV infection in humans is the passive transfer of the virus-specific monoclonal antiserum, Palivizumab, which recognizes a conserved epitope in the F protein of hRSV. As proof of the importance of neutralizing antibodies in the immune response to hRSV, the antiserum is effective as a prophylactic and known to reduce disease severity in hRSV-infected infants [
106,
107,
108].