Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of toxinsMDPI Open Access JournalsMDPI Open Access JournalsThis articleThis JournalInstructions for authorsAdd your e-mail address to receive forthcoming issues of this journalToxins
Toxins (Basel). 2012 December; 4(12): 1468–1481.
Published online 2012 December 10. doi:  10.3390/toxins4121468
PMCID: PMC3528257

A Saccharomyces cerevisiae Wine Strain Inhibits Growth and Decreases Ochratoxin A Biosynthesis by Aspergillus carbonarius and Aspergillus ochraceus


The aim of this study was to select wine yeast strains as biocontrol agents against fungal contaminants responsible for the accumulation of ochratoxin A (OTA) in grape and wine and to dissect the mechanism of OTA detoxification by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain (DISAABA1182), which had previously been reported to reduce OTA in a synthetic must. All of the yeast strains tested displayed an ability to inhibit the growth of Aspergillus carbonarius both in vivo and in vitro and addition of culture filtrates from the tested isolates led to complete inhibition of OTA production. S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 was selected and further tested for its capacity to inhibit OTA production and pks (polyketide synthase) transcription in A. carbonarius and Aspergillus ochraceus in vitro. In order to dissect the mechanism of OTA detoxification, each of these two fungi was co-cultured with living yeast cells exposed to yeast crude or to autoclaved supernatant: S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 was found to inhibit mycelial growth and OTA production in both Aspergilli when co-cultured in the OTA-inducing YES medium. Moreover, a decrease in pks transcription was observed in the presence of living cells of S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 or its supernatant, while no effects were observed on transcription of either of the constitutively expressed calmodulin and β-tubulin genes. This suggests that transcriptional regulation of OTA biosynthetic genes takes place during the interaction between DISAABA1182 and OTA-producing Aspergilli.

Keywords: polyketide synthase, grape, Ochratoxin A, biological control, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Aspergillus carbonarius, Aspergillus ochraceus

1. Introduction

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a pentaketide mycotoxin which is produced by several fungal species from the Aspergillus and Penicillium genera. OTA is nephrotoxic, hepatotoxic, teratogenic and carcinogenic to animals and has been classified by the International Agency of Research on Cancer (IARC) as a possible human renal carcinogen (group 2B) [1]. It is known to occur in a variety of foods and different plant products, including cereals, coffee, cocoa, beer, and wine.

OTA was first detected in wine by Zimmerli and Dick [2], where its presence is commonly ascribed to infection of wine grapes by Aspergillus carbonarius and some strains of Aspergilli section nigri. Currently, maximum permitted levels of 2 μg·kg−1 have been established for OTA in wines and grape must-based drinks in the European Union (Commission regulation No. 123/2005 amending Regulation No. 446/2001).

From an epidemiological standpoint, infection by Aspergillus spp. immediately prior to or during harvesting, transportation and storage of grapes is considered to be a critical point in OTA contamination of wine [3]. Fungicide treatments at either the pre-harvest or post-harvest stage are however not practical, due to the risk of contamination of the wine by toxic residues [4].

An alternative strategy which has been proposed is the use of biological control based methodologies, which have been proposed as an environmentally sound approach to prevent infection caused by OTA-producing fungi [5]. OTA levels have also previously been shown to decrease during wine fermentations, and this decrease is known to be related to the action of both lactic acid bacteria and yeasts [6,7,8,9,10].

Among the microorganisms with potential utility in biological control-based strategies, yeasts appear particularly promising, particularly due to their ability to colonise plant surfaces or wounds for long periods under dry conditions coupled with an ability to display multiple mechanisms of antagonism [11]. However, the establishment of an antagonistic yeast may be difficult to achieve under unfavourable environmental conditions such as those that they are likely to encounter in the fermenting must, due to the rapid increase in ethanol concentration which takes place, thereby potentially reducing their ability to compete with the resident microbial flora.

We report here on the in vivo and in vitro biocontrol potential of five S. cerevisiae and of two Kloeckera apiculata wine strains, which were preliminarily tested against A. carbonarius, the main producer of OTA in grape. Moreover, we have evaluated the effect of both living cells and culture filtrates of S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 both on fungal growth and on transcription of the OTA polyketide synthase (pks) gene, which is responsible for the biosynthesis of OTA by A. carbonarius and A. ochraceus.

2. Results and Discussion

The need to develop natural alternatives to chemical control strategies has led to the application of various yeast strains as biocontrol agents against various plant pathogenic fungi. There are a large number of reports in the literature detailing that antagonistic yeasts possess effective mechanisms for the control of spoilage microorganisms. These antagonistic properties have been well studied and have been successfully exploited in the biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits [12]. In addition, yeasts have a long history of proven safe use as fermentative starters in food and beverages [13,14,15]. The aims of this study were: (i) to select wine yeast strains which display antagonistic activity against OTA-producing Aspergilli; and (ii) to investigate possible mechanisms of action of an antagonistic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae against both A. carbonarius and A. ochraceus.

During the wine making process, OTA levels are known to decrease, an effect which is believed to be mediated by the activity of the resident microbial flora, particularly of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts [10,16,17,18]. The reduction in OTA level which is mediated by yeasts has been ascribed to different mechanisms including adsorption onto the yeast cell surface, or due to interactions with yeast metabolites. Moreover, Angioni and co-workers have reported that OTA residues do not affect the fermentative process and that reduction of OTA content is a strain-related peculiarity [6].

In the present work, wine strains of S. cerevisiae (five strains) and K. apiculata (two strains) were tested to assess their potential antagonistic effects against A. carbonarius in a co-inoculation assay performed in vitro on agar plates using different culture media. This assay was employed in order to select yeast strains that would be able to inhibit the co-inoculated fungus while colonising a common ecological niche. All seven yeast strains displayed an ability to inhibit fungal growth when co-cultured in CYA and YES media, with levels of inhibition in growth of up to 65% being observed. The yeast strain which exhibited the maximal levels of growth inhibition of A. carbonarius was S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 following growth on YES medium (Table 1).

Table 1
Growth of Aspergillus carbonarius MPV A566 in YES medium alone or in co-culture with antagonistic Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Kloeckera apiculata strains after seven days at 25 °C.

When A. carbonarius was cultured alone in liquid media, higher levels of OTA were observed from cultures grown on CYB (0.3 ± 0.1 μg/mL) than on YES (0.2 ± 0.1 μg/mL). Abramson and Clear [19] have suggested that this could be related to differences in the overall sucrose content of each medium: YES (15% sucrose)/CYB (3% sucrose); while CYB may also represent a less hydrophilic layer making it more permeable to lipophilic solvents used in OTA extraction.

All of the yeast strains tested displayed an ability to completely inhibit OTA contamination in the Aspergillus culture filtrate (data not shown). This significant decrease in OTA levels in co-cultures with yeast appears to be related to the inhibition of A. carbonarius growth. Nevertheless, OTA production is not necessarily proportional to the biomass of the mycotoxigenic fungi, as it has been shown for other mycotoxins [20]. An increase in OTA production in the fungal biomass may in some instances take place as a consequence of competition among microorganisms for essential environmental factors. Inter-microbial competition is a stressful physiological condition and is known to have a dramatic effect on secondary metabolism in both food spoilage and phytopathogenic fungi. In addition nutrient availability is also known to markedly influence OTA production in other Aspergilli. For example OTA production in A. ochraceus has been shown to be dependent on nutrient content [21], as well as a variety of nutritional based factors such as various carbon and nitrogen sources [22]. In addition Teren et al. [23] have suggested that Aspergilli are capable of assimilating the phenylalanine moiety from the OTA molecule, as a nitrogen source in nutrient replete culture medium.

Selected yeast strains were also assessed for their ability to inhibit berry infection by A. carbonarius upon co-inoculation. The wine yeast strains significantly reduced fungal colonisation on artificially inoculated grape berries of two cultivars namely Cannonau (a red cultivar) and Vermentino (a white cultivar) (Table 2).

Table 2
Aspergillus carbonarius MPV A566 infection rate on grape berries (cultivars Vermentino and Cannonau) co-inoculated with antagonistic Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Kloeckera apiculata strains after seven days at 25 °C.

The mean disease reduction rate was up to 70% in all strains tested, ranging from between 80%-99% and 75%-100% for the Vermentino and Cannonau cultivars, respectively (Table 2). Differences in grape varieties are known to affect fungal invasion, with skin hardness and thickness as well as tannin content known to be a hurdle for penetration by the pathogen [24]. A. carbonarius is well known to be a very invasive fungus which is capable of colonising and penetrating berries even without skin damage and to grow at 25-35 °C and 0.95-0.99 aw, respectively [25]. It should be emphasised that the experimental conditions employed here to assess the potential in vivo biocontrol activity of the yeast strains against A. carbonarius, were highly favourable to the fungus. OTA accumulation is known to mainly occur at ripening, when the fungus preferentially infects berries by entering skin wounds which are induced either by insects and/or injuries caused by meteorological phenomena. High levels of fungal infection and consequent wine contamination by OTA may then take place when high humidity and temperature conditions occur coupled with grape berry damage. Furthermore, the levels of infection by A. carbonarius and the synthesis of OTA are the highest on wounded berries that are detached and that are subject to conducive temperatures, such as those adopted in our laboratory experiments. Thus, although the experimental conditions employed here should have been highly conducive to fungal infection, almost all yeast strains provided an efficient protection to the wine grape berries against infection by A. carbonarius for up to seven days (Table 2). Such a time lag could be crucial in ensuring that the wine grape harvest is biologically protected during the most critical phase for OTA contamination, i.e., between harvesting and pressing [3].

General nutrient competition in the grape berry is not per se sufficient to explain yeast biocontrol activity. Nevertheless, this finding does not exclude the possibility that the antagonistic behavior being exhibited by these yeast strains may be as a result of competition for a specific growth limiting factor, such as—for example—a vitamin or another nutrient. According to related pathosystems, other possible mechanisms may include biofilm formation on the wound surface [26], the inhibition of fungal secondary metabolism [27], the production of antifungal enzymes [28] or the induction of resistance in the fruit tissues [12,29].

In order to explore possible mechanisms of biocontrol activity the most effective strain, DISAABA1182 was selected for further investigations. In a study involving 20 yeast strains S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 had previously been reported to exhibit the most potent inhibitory effect in decreasing OTA levels [6]. These authors have also shown that as OTA residues were not recovered from the yeast cell biomass and due to the absence of OTα and phenylalanine in the must that another degradation pathway may be employed by this yeast strain.

The OTA biosynthetic pathway, while as yet not fully elucidated in any fungal species, is believed to involve the synthesis of an isocoumarin group which is a pentaketide formed from an acetate and malonate requiring the involvement of a polyketide synthase (PKS) enzyme. A number of studies have reported a direct link between pks gene expression and OTA production [21,22]. In order to examine a possible correlation between reduced OTA production and pks gene expression [30,31,32,33] two OTA-producing strains namely A. carbonarius MPV A566 and A. ochraceus MPV A703 were co-cultured with S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 as well as being exposed to supernatant preparations from the yeast.

Following growth of both A. ochraceus MPV A703 and A. carbonarius MPV A566 under OTA inducing conditions (YES medium), OTA production was observed (Figure 1). With A. ochraceus MPV A703, OTA production was first observed on day 3 with levels increasing to reach their highest levels on day 7, while the highest level of OTA produced by A. carbonarius MPV A566 was detected on day 6 and started to decrease on day 7 (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Ochratoxin A (OTA) production by Aspergillus ochraceus MPVA703 (upper) and Aspergillus carbonarius MPVA566 (lower) grown alone or co-cultured with S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 on YES medium for seven days at 25 °C. OTA values are expressed as μg/mL ...

When A. ochraceus and A. carbonarius were grown in co-culture with living cells of S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 living cells, a decrease of 98% and 95% in overall OTA concentrations was observed, respectively. Similarly, a reduction in fungal biomass of up to 95% was observed for both fungi following six days of incubation (Table 3).

Table 3
Fungal growth and OTA production in A. ochraceus MPVA703 and A. carbonarius MPVA566 grown for six days at 25 °C in YES medium amended with living cells of S. cerevisiae strain DISAABA1182, together with crude and autoclaved supernatant preparations. ...

To provide further insights into potential mechanisms which may be involved in OTA reduction caused by the yeast, A. ochraceus MPV A703 and A. carbonarius MPV A566 were statically grown for six days at 25 °C in YES medium amended with either crude supernatant from strain DISAABA1182 or with supernatant which had been previously autoclaved for one hour. A reduction in OTA levels was observed for both fungi with these decreases being accompanied by reductions in fungal biomass (Table 3). Crude supernatant preparations from strain DISAABA1182 reduced OTA production by 99% and 94%, respectively in A. ochraceus and A. carbonarius; and fungal growth was inhibited by up to 96%. When autoclaved supernatant preparations from DISAABA1182 were tested complete suppression of OTA production in both fungi was observed, while fungal biomass levels were reduced by 58% in the case of A. ochraceus and 96% for A. carbonarius (Table 3). Thus while in the case of A. carbonarius it is quite clear that fungal biomass affects OTA production, i.e., the growth of the fungus corresponds to the production of OTA, this does not seem to apply to A. ochraceus when co-cultured with autoclaved supernatant preparations from S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182. Schmidt-Heydt and co-workers previously reported that OTA production does not always directly correlate with fungal biomass, and showed that different environmental factors can affect the production of this mycotoxin in different ways [33].

Thus to determine whether the observed effects were being mediated at the level of gene expression, polyketide synthase (pks) gene transcript levels were analysed in A. ochraceus and A. carbonarius during co-culture with strain DISAABA1182 (Figure 2). Reduced levels of pks gene transcript were evident in A. ochraceus, while in the case of A. carbonarius the pks gene expression was only slightly reduced. The expression levels of β-tubulin and calmodulin genes observed under the test conditions suggest that changes in pks gene expression are specific and not simply occurring as a result of changes in overall gene transcription levels in the fungus.

Figure 2
RT-PCR analysis of pks gene expression in Aspergillus ochraceus MPVA703 and Aspergillus carbonarius MPVA566 grown alone or in presence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain DISAABA1182 living cells (A), or its crude and autoclaved supernatants (B). RNA was ...

As previously mentioned, it has been well established that a number of physiochemical parameters, such as nutritional and environmental stimuli, play an important role in the regulation of mycotoxin biosynthesis [22,34]. Previous studies have shown that OTA production by A. ochraceus is dependent on the growth medium [30] and that production is concomitant with increases in pks gene transcript levels. A correlation has also been reported between physiological stress factors and the expression of genes responsible for ochratoxin A production in Penicillium verrucosum [33]. In our study the strong reduction in pks gene expression in A. carbonarius and, to a lesser extent, in A. ochraceus correlates closely with the reduced OTA levels, suggesting that the observed reduction in OTA production may be mediated at the level of gene transcription (Table 3; Figure 2).

Thus S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 inhibits growth, OTA production and pks expression in two ochratoxigenic strains of A. carbonarius and A. ochraceus and constitutes one of a few reports which have to date described the effects of biocontrol agents on the expression of mycotoxin biosynthetic genes [34,35]. One such report involves an antagonistic strain of Debaryomyces hansenii which has been observed to reduce the expression of OTA biosynthetic genes in A. westerdijkiae [35]. The mechanisms resulting in reduced OTA production and inhibition of Aspergillus growth by S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 remain to be further elucidated but are likely to involve a number of synergistic mechanisms, including effects mediated at the level of gene transcription.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Fungal Strains and Culture Condition

The strains Aspergillus carbonarius Bainier Thom. MPVA566 and Aspergillus ochraceus G. Wilh. MPVA703 belong to the Collection of the University of Piacenza (courtesy Professor Paola Battilani). Spore suspensions of both fungi were prepared by collecting conidia from five-day-old colonies grown on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA; Merck, Milano, Italy) at 25 °C in distilled water. Spore concentration was determined by using a Thoma haemocytometer and brought to a standard concentration of spores of 105/mL.

Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen ex Reess and Kloeckera apiculata Reess emend. Klöcker belong to the culture collection of University of Sassari-Dipartimento di Agraria. Yeast strains were routinely prepared by inoculating 50 mL of Yeast Peptone Dextrose (YPD), consisting of 1% yeast extract, 2% bacto-peptone (Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), 2% dextrose broth (Carlo Erba Reagenti, Milano, Italy), 2% Bacto-agar (Fluka, Milano, Italy), with a loop of cells and by incubating on a rotary shaker (180 rpm) at 25 °C for 24 h. Cell concentration was determined by using a Thoma haemocytometer. The yeast strains were stored in YPD at 4 °C, and in 50% glycerol at −80 °C.

3.2. Inhibition of in Vitro Growth and OTA Production by A. carbonarius and A. ochraceus

Inhibition experiments were performed on YPD, CYA (Czapek Yeast Extract) and YES (Yeast Peptone Dextrose; Merck) agar media. Top agar was prepared by mixing 6 mL of medium with 0.7% agar at 40 °C and 1 mL of yeast suspension containing 106 cells/mL. The agar-yeast suspension was poured into Petri dishes that contained 15 mL of agar medium. Once the top agar had set, three 10-μL portions of a spore suspension of A. carbonarius MPVA566 (105 CFU/mL) were separately spotted on each plate. Three replicate experiments for each yeast strain were performed, each one consisting of three replicate plates. Plates inoculated with A. carbonarius MPVA566 only were used as control. Fungal growth inhibition was determined as the percentage of colony diameter decrease compared to control after 7 days at 25 °C.

In a second set of experiments static cultures of A. ochraceus MPVA703 and A. carbonarius MPVA566 were grown in YES for 3 days at 25 °C before addition of living cells of S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 (final concentration: 106 cells mL−1) and allowed to grown for 8 days under the same conditions.

Static cultures of A. ochraceus MPVA703 and A. carbonarius MPVA566 were grown in YES amended with supernatant from S. cerevisiae 1182 supernatant (cell-free culture filtrate) at a 1:1 ratio of YES:yeast filtrate for 8 days at 25 °C in the dark. S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 culture filtrates were obtained from overnight YES liquid grown cultures (final concentration 106 cells mL−1), centrifuged for 20 min at 1500× g and filtered through a Millipore 0.22 μm nitrocellulose filter.

Fungal biomass was filtered, thoroughly washed with deionised water, blotted dry with Whatman paper, and stored at −70 °C overnight before freeze-drying.

3.3. Effect of Yeast Antagonists on OTA Production by A. carbonarius

A co-culture of A. carbonarius and each of the tested yeasts strains was grown on liquid CYA and YES media. A. carbonarius was also inoculated in yeast-free CYA and YES broth, which was used as control. Following incubation for 7 days at 25 °C in the dark, production of OTA was estimated by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), according to Sibanda et al. [36] with a Beckman Ultrasphere C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μM) reversed-phase column. The mobil phase was acetonitrile:water:acetic acid (99:99:2). OTA was detected using a Merck-Hitachi fluorescence detector with an excitation wavelength of 333 nm and an emission wavelength of 460 nm. All samples were diluted 1:1 with HPLC mobile phase prior to analysis.

3.4. Biological Control of A. carbonarius on Wounded Berries

Mature bunches of grapes of two common Sardinian cultivars, i.e., Cannonau (red) and Vermentino (white), were disinfected with 1% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min and rinsed twice with distilled water. Artificial wounds (2 mm diameter) were made in each berry with a sterile needle to simulate natural damage. Grape bunches were initially dipped in a cell suspension (108 CFU/mL) of each antagonistic yeast strain and then allowed to dry at room temperature before spraying with an aqueous spore suspension of the test fungus (104 CFU/mL) until runoff. Each treatment, consisting of three replicate bunches of grapes (5 berries/bunch), which were placed in plastic containers (60 × 40 × 15 cm, one layer), wrapped in transparent polyethylene bags to prevent evaporation, and stored for 6 days at 25 °C and 85% relative humidity. Positive controls consisted of berries which were treated with sterile water and then sprayed with an A. carbonarius MPVA566 spore suspension as described. Three separate experiments were in each case independently conducted.

3.5. Genomic DNA Isolation, RNA Preparation, cDNA Synthesis and RT-PCR

Fungal DNA was extracted according to Al-Samarrai and Schmid [37]. Based on previous pks gene expression studies [21,31] mycelium samples were collected at day 4 from Aspergillus cultures grown on liquid YES medium. These were filtered, weighted and stored at −70 °C until further use. Stored mycelia was ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen with a mortar and pestle. RNA was extracted using a RNasy plant mini kit (Quiagen), treated with DNase I (Roche, Milano, Italy) to remove contaminating DNA and stored at −70 °C. An aliquot of RNA was separated on an agarose gel to check for integrity [38]. The RNA concentration for each sample was determined spectrophotometrically and was in each case brought to an identical value.

cDNA was synthesized from mycelia using reverse transcriptase and random hexamer promoter (Roche) as previously described [39]. The cDNA was used as template for a PCR amplification with a pks gene-specific primers pair designed using sequences from O’Callaghan et al., and Gallo et al. [21,31] (Table 4). The housekeeping genes calmodulin and β-tubulin from A. carbonarius and A. ochraceus, respectively (Table 4), were used as a control to monitor expression of constitutively expressed genes.

Table 4
PCR primers used in the RT-PCR experiments.

Amplifications were performed with a GeneAMP system 9600 (Perkin-Elmer) in 25 μL reaction mixture containing: 2.5 μL of Taq polymerase buffer 10×, 1 μL of 50 mM MgCl2, 1 μL of dNTP 10 mM of each, 1 μM of each primer, 0.5 U of Taq (Roche), 50 ng of genomic DNA, H2O up to 25 μL. Reaction conditions were: 94 °C for 3 min, then 33 cycles consisting of 94 °C for 1 min, 58 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 45 s, followed by one final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified products were examined by agarose gel electrophoresis following standard methods.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

Data from two or three independent experiments were subjected to one-way analysis of variance followed by multiple comparisons by Dunnett’s test, using Minitab® for Windows release 12.1.

4. Conclusions

We report here for the first time on the biocontrol activity observed in the wine strain S. cerevisiae (DISAABA1182) that decreases growth, OTA production, and pks expression in two ochratoxigenic strains of A. carbonarius and A. ochraceus. This strain displayed good biocontrol characteristics under both in vitro and in vivo conditions and should in future be considered as an efficient alternative to fungicides to control fungal growth and OTA production on grapes and other fresh or dried fruit commodities which are prone to Aspergillus spp. infection and OTA contamination. S. cerevisiae DISAABA1182 has previously been shown to be capable of reducing OTA levels in synthetic must [6]; and the present report provides further evidence of the suitability of this strain as a starter in winemaking, particularly with wine grape berries that may be contaminated by OTA.


This publication was made possible by NPRP grant # NPRP 4-259-2-083 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) IARCS Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic risks to Humans. Vol. 56. IARC; Lyon, France: 1993. Ochratoxin A; pp. 489–452.
2. Zimmerli B., Dick R. Ochratoxin A in table wine and grape-juice: Occurrence and risk assessment. Food Addit. Contam. 1996;13:655–668. doi: 10.1080/02652039609374451. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Martinez-Rodriguez A.J., Carrascosa A.V. HACCP to control microbial safety hazards during winemaking: Ochratoxin A. Food Control. 2009;20:469–475. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.07.015. [Cross Ref]
4. Cabras P., Angioni A. Pesticide residues in grapes, wine, and their processing products. J.Agric.Food Chem. 2000;48:967–973. doi: 10.1021/jf990727a. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Bleve G., Grieco F., Cozzi G., Logrieco A., Visconti A. Isolation of epiphytic yeasts with potential for biocontrol of Aspergillus carbonarius and A. niger on grape. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006;108:204–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.12.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Angioni A., Caboni P., Garau A., Farris G.A., Orro D., Budroni M., Cabras P. In vitro interaction between ochratoxin A and different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kloeckera apiculata. J. Agric.Food Chem. 2007;55:2043–2048. [PubMed]
7. Bejaoui H., Mathieu F., Taillandier P., Lebrihi A. Ochratoxin A removal in synthetic and natural grape juices by selected oenological Saccharomyces strains. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004;97:1038–1044. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02385.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Meca G., Blaiotta G., Ritieni A. Reduction of ochratoxin A during the fermentation of Italian red wine Moscato. Food Control. 2010;21:579–583. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.08.008. [Cross Ref]
9. Patharajan S., Reddy K.R.N., Karthikeyan V., Spadaro D., Gullino M.L., Garibaldi A. Potential of yeast antagonists on in vitro biodegradation of ochratoxin A. Food Control. 2010;22:290–296.
10. Shetty P.H., Jespersen L. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lactic acid bacteria as potential mycotoxin decontaminating agents. Trends Food Sci.Technol. 2006;17:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2005.10.004. [Cross Ref]
11. Droby S., Wisniewski M., Macarisin D., Wilson C. Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm? Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2009;52:137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.009. [Cross Ref]
12. Droby S., Vinokur V., Weiss B., Cohen L., Daus A., Goldschmidt E.E., Porat R. Induction of resistance to Penicillium digitatum in grapefruit by the yeast biocontrol agent Candida oleophila. Biol. Control. 2002;92:393–339. [PubMed]
13. Ciani M., Comitini F., Mannazzu I., Domizio P. Controlled mixed culture fermentation: A new perspective on the use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in winemaking. FEMS Yeast Res. 2010;10:123–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00579.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Fleet G.H. Wine yeasts for the future. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008;8:979–995. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00427.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Jakobsen M., Narvhus J. Yeasts and their possible beneficial and negative effects on the quality of dairy products. Int. Dairy J. 1996;6:755–768. doi: 10.1016/0958-6946(95)00071-2. [Cross Ref]
16. Kapetanakou A.E., Kollias J.N., Drosinos E.H., Skandamis P.N. Inhibition of A. carbonarius growth and reduction of ochratoxin A by bacteria and yeast composites of technological importance in culture media and beverages. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012;152:91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.09.010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Esti M., Benucci I., Liburdi K., Acciaro G. Monitoring of ochratoxin A fate during alcoholic fermentation of wine-must. Food Control. 2012;27:53–56. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.02.030. [Cross Ref]
18. Cecchini F., Morassut M., Garcia Moruno E., di Stefano R. Influence of yeast strain on ochratoxin A content during fermentation of white and red must. Food Microbiol. 2006;23:411–417. doi: 10.1016/ [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Abramson D., Clear R.M. A convenient method for assessing mycotoxin production in cultures of Aspergilli and Penicillia. J. Food Protect. 1996;59:642–644.
20. Xu X.M., Monger W., Ritieni A., Nicholson P. Effect of temperature and duration of wetness during initial infection periods on disease development, fungal biomass and mycotoxin concentrations on wheat inoculated with single, or combinations of Fusarium species. Plant Pathol. 2007;56:943–956. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01650.x. [Cross Ref]
21. O’Callaghan J., Stapleton P.C., Dobson A.D.W. Ochratoxin A biosynthetic genes in Aspergillus ochraceus are differentially regulated by pH and nutritional stimuli. Fungal Genet.Biol. 2006;43:213–221. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.11.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Abbas A., Valez H., Dobson A.D.W. Analysis of the effect of nutritional factors on OTA and OTB biosynthesis and polyketide synthase gene expression in Aspergillus ochraceus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009;13:22–27. [PubMed]
23. Teren J., Varga J., Hamari Z., Rinyu E., Kevei F. Immunochemical detection of ochratoxin A in black Aspergillus strains. Mycopathologia. 1996;134:171–176. doi: 10.1007/BF00436726. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Deytieux-Belleau C., Geny L., Roudet J., Mayet V., Doneche B., Fermaud M. Grape berry skin features related to ontogenic resistance to Botrytis cinerea. Eur.J. Plant Pathol. 2009;125:551–563. doi: 10.1007/s10658-009-9503-6. [Cross Ref]
25. Leong S.L., Hocking A.D., Pitt J.I. Occurrence of fruit rot fungi (Aspergillus Section Nigri) on some drying varieties of irrigated grapes. Aust.J. Grape Wine Res. 2004;10:83–88.
26. Giobbe S., Marceddu S., Scherm B., Zara G., Mazzarello V., Budroni M., Migheli The strange case of a biofilm-forming strain of Pichia fermentans, which controls Monilinia brown rot on apple but is pathogenic on peach fruit. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007;7:1389–1398. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00301.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Palumbo J.D., O’Keeffe T.L., Abbas H.K. Microbial interactions with mycotoxigenic fungi and mycotoxins. J. Toxicol. Toxins Rev. 2008;27:261–285.
28. Wisniewski M.E., Biles C., Droby S., McLaughlin R., Wilson C.L., Chalutz E. Mode of action of the postharvest biocontrol yeast, Pichia guilliermondii. 1. Characterization of attachment to Botrytis cinerea. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1991;39:245–258. doi: 10.1016/0885-5765(91)90033-E. [Cross Ref]
29. Yu T., Zheng X.D. An integrated strategy to control postharvest blue and grey mould rots of apple fruit by combining biocontrol yeast with gibberellic acid. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007;42:977–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01321.x. [Cross Ref]
30. Atoui A., Mathieu F., Lebrihi A. Targeting a polyketide synthase gene for Aspergillus carbonarius quantification and ochratoxin A assessment in grapes using real-time PCR. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007;115:313–318. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.11.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Gallo A., Perrone G., Solfrizzo M., Epifani F., Abbas A., Dobson A.D.W., Mulè G. Characterisationof a pks gene which is expressed during ochratoxin A production by Aspergillus carbonarius. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009;129:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.10.022. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Crespo-Sempere A., González-Candelas L., Martínez-Culebras P.V. Genes differentially expressed by Aspergillus carbonarius strains under ochratoxin A producing conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010;142:170–179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.06.019. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Schmidt-Heydt M., Baxter E., Geisen R., Magan N. Physiological relationship between food preservatives, environmental factors, ochratoxin and otapksPV gene expression by Penicillium verrucosum. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007;119:277–283. [PubMed]
34. Ismail Y., McCormick S., Hijri M. A fungal symbiont of plant-roots modulates mycotoxin gene expression in the pathogen Fusarium sambucinum. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017990. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Gil-Serna J., Patiño B., Cortés L., González-Jaén M.T., Vázquez C. Mechanisms involved in reduction of ochratoxin A produced by Aspergillus westerdijkiae using Debaryomyces hansenii CYC 1244. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011;151:113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.08.012. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Sibanda L., de Daeger S., van Peteghem C. Optimization of solid-phase clean-up prior to liquid chromatographic analysis of OTA in roasted coffee. J. Chromatogr. A. 2002;959:327–330. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00408-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Al-Samarrai T.H., Schmid J. A simple method for extraction of fungal genomic DNA. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2001;30:53–56. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2000.00664.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Sambrook J., Russell D.W. Molecular Cloning. 3rd. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor, New York, NY, USA: 2001.
39. Soden D.M., Dobson A.D. Differential regulation of laccase gene expression in Pleurotus sajor-caju. Microbiology. 2001;147:1755–1763. [PubMed]

Articles from Toxins are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)