PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Clin Obstet Gynecol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 March 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3521615
NIHMSID: NIHMS417581

Is Sonographic Assessment of the Cervix Necessary and Helpful?

Joel D. Larma, M.D.1 and Jay D. Iams, M.D.1

Abstract

Transvaginal sonography of the cervix has emerged as a useful window onto preterm parturition. Cervical sonography allows measurements of cervical length which can aid clinicians in identifying women at risk for preterm birth. The use of transvaginal assessments of cervical length can assist in the triage of patients with possible preterm labor. Recent studies also support the use of cervical length measurements as a means of determining appropriate candidates for cerclage placement and progesterone supplementation to reduce the risk of premature birth, further highlighting the importance of this modality in modern obstetric management.

Keywords: Cervical, ultrasound, length, preterm, cerclage, progesterone

History

The cervix has a unique role in parturition, tasked with retention of a pregnancy until active labor, when it must then reverse functions, i.e. dilating to accommodate the delivery of a fetus. The cervix then returns to its original shape and must serially replicate its role in subsequent pregnancies. Failure of the cervix to retain the pregnancy has long been known as cervical incompetence, and more recently as cervical insufficiency. Given these remarkable requirements and the potential for neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with deficient function, it is not surprising that investigators have been fascinated with studying the cervix. Imaging modalities such as ultrasonography have produced numerous insights into cervical changes during pregnancy. Current practitioners are most familiar with measurement of a cervical length (CL) (Figure 1) with transvaginal sonography, but the early studies used a transabdominal (TA) approach. The width of the internal os and the cervical length between the internal os (sometimes described as having a triangular appearance) and the external os, were measured using TA sonography first in women with a classical diagnosis of cervical incompetence, defined as a history of three or more second trimester births with painless cervical dilation.

Figure 1
Transvaginal ultrasound of cervical length

Subsequent studies related ultrasonographic findings to obstetric outcomes, demonstrating a direct relation between the width of the internal os and the risk of preterm birth. The first delineation of the cervix as “short” versus “normal” used a threshold length of 3 cm1. Along with other indices of cervical measurements, such as bulging of membranes into the endocervical canal and the thickness of the anterior wall of the lower uterine segment, the authors found that the presence of a “short” cervix was associated with a significantly increased risk for premature birth1. As studies moved from descriptive to comparative, cervical lengths were stratified according to variables such as presence or absence of premature contractions or risk factors for preterm birth, allowing for improved conclusions regarding the utility of cervical sonography.

The breakthrough came with the use of transvaginal ultrasonography, which significantly improved visualization of the cervix2. Sonek et. al. described their experience with transvaginal (TV) ultrasonography of the pregnant cervix including a protocol for measuring the cervix, which has been modified over time to become the current standard3. Measurement is performed over a period of approximately 5 minutes, and the shortest measurement that best displays the landmarks of internal os, external os, cervical canal, empty maternal bladder, and absence of undue pressure (the “shortest best” measurement) is recorded, not the average. The superiority of the TV approach was further illustrated when comparing ultrasound versus digital assessment of cervical length3. The authors found that the digital approach tended to underestimate the length of the cervix by a centimeter or more3. The inter-observer variation of TV CL measurements ranges between 5 to 10%3. The TV approach also improved the likelihood of obtaining adequate measurements. In a comparison of TV and TA sonography of the cervix, Andersen obtained adequate measurements of cervical length in 99.5% of women with TV sonography and only 86% with TA sonography4. Notably, abdominal measurements were 5.2 mm longer than measurements obtained vaginally, a significant difference. Because a full maternal bladder causes an unpredictable effect on TA measurements, the vaginal technique became the gold standard. The American College of Radiology and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine both affirm the use of TV sonography as the optimal method visualization of the cervix.

Prediction of Preterm Birth (PTB)

Anderson2 and others reported studies relating cervical length to risk of preterm birth that led the NICHD MFM Research Network to include cervical sonography in the Preterm Prediction Study, an observational study of multiple markers of PTB risk5. More than 3000 women with singleton pregnancies were enrolled, chosen to reflect the parity and racial/ethnic characteristics of the 10 participating sites and the primary endpoint was birth before 35 weeks gestation. Cervical length was measured with TV ultrasound between 22-24 weeks gestation and again 4 weeks later with CL measurements being normally distributed at both exams5. The risk of preterm birth increased as the length of the cervix decreased. Compared to women whose cervical length was above the 75th percentile at 22-24 weeks (> 40 mm), the relative risk of premature birth before 35 weeks was 3.79 in women with a CL < 30 mm, and 6.19 for women with a CL < 26 mm5. A cervical length ≤ 25 mm at 24 weeks' had a sensitivity of 37.3% and a specificity of 92.2% for detection of premature birth < 35 weeks. A threshold of 30 mm had sensitivity and specificity of 54% and 76.3% respectively5. The risk was highest for women with the shortest cervical length below 15 mm, the 3rd percentile, but remarkably, fewer than 50% of these untreated women (the findings were masked) delivered before 35 weeks5. Other studies subsequently confirmed the inverse relationship between cervical length and the risk of premature birth6. Of 2505 women studied by Heath et al with transvaginal ultrasound at 23 weeks', only 43 (1.72%) had a cervical length ≤ 15 mm6. The likelihood ratios (LR) for premature birth ≤ 32 weeks in this study were 51.5, 2.7 and 0.4 in women with CL measurements of 5 mm, 15 and 50 mm, respectively.

Studies relating cervical length to premature birth risk can be difficult to compare because of variations in the population enrolled, gestational age(s) at examination, number of examinations, and presentation of data and outcomes as continuous or categorical. Cervical length data collected in the NICHD Preterm Prediction Study has been analyzed in secondary analyses limited to women with7 and without8 a previous preterm birth. In women with a prior preterm birth, cervical length at 22-24 weeks gestation can distinguish women with high (> 35% if CL < 25 mm) and low (<10% if CL > 35 mm) risk of recurrent preterm birth7. A positive fetal fibronectin collected at the same time doubled the risk of preterm birth in these high risk women7. In low risk women, the sensitivity of a CL < 25 mm to detect women who would later deliver preterm was approximately 40 percent8. Another MFMU study of cervical length enrolled 183 women with a prior preterm delivery before 32 weeks. Cervical length measurements were obtained at two-week intervals beginning at 16-18 weeks. Cervical length was analyzed in 3 groups, as < 25 mm, 25-29 mm and 30 mm or higher, and related to gestational age at birth, categorized as < 26 weeks, 26-34 weeks and ≥ 35 weeks9. There are many other studies that have enrolled populations with and without a priori risk to perform cervical ultrasound studies using various thresholds, definitions, and imaging techniques, e.g., transperineal or transabdominal imaging6-9. Regardless, several findings have been consistently observed:

  • Cervical effacement begins at the internal os, progressing cephalad to caudad. Effacement precedes dilation.
  • The length of the closed portion of the cervical canal is related to the risk of preterm birth: the shorter the cervix, the greater the risk.
  • A short cervix does not always – indeed, does not usually – mean that preterm birth will occur; most women with short cervix deliver after 35 weeks' gestation

What Causes a Short Cervix?

Initial interpretation of the relationship between short cervix and preterm birth was guided by the expectation that uterine contractions produce cervical change. Thus the finding of short cervix in the second trimester of pregnancy in women who did not have contractions was taken to be evidence of “a continuum of cervical competence” in which more length suggested greater competence – analogous to the sport of basketball, where greater height confers an advantage. This concept arose from a 1995 study in which cervical length measurements in women with a previous term birth were compared to measurements obtained from women with a history of premature births and from women with a classic history of cervical insufficiency10. Cervical length in the current pregnancy was linearly related to the gestational age at birth in the previous pregnancy: women who delivered before 26 weeks in a previous pregnancy had shorter cervical lengths than those delivering between 27-32 weeks, who had a shorter measurement than those who had delivered between 33-35 weeks10. The shortest cervical lengths were observed in women diagnosed with cervical insufficiency, and the longest were obtained from women who had previously delivered only at term. This pattern was consistent over a broad range of gestational age periods. These data suggested that cervical length was a surrogate for competence, and thus functioned as a continuum. In 1996, the first analyses from the NICHD Prediction Study emphasized the inverse relation between cervical length and risk of preterm birth5. Because the subjects were all asymptomatic outpatients, little credence was given to the possibility that short cervical length at 22-24 weeks' gestation could result from an active parturition process. Instead, the results were also interpreted as consistent with the “continuum of cervical competence”. This concept was later embraced by an American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin11. The corollary that a short cervix could be corrected by a properly placed cerclage suture soon acquired believers, but subsequent clinical experience and research are not consistent with that conclusion12-15. Cerclage is not a uniformly effective treatment for short cervix, apparently beneficial for some women with a prior preterm birth, of no benefit for others, and linked to increased risk of preterm birth in women with twins12-15. Meanwhile, supplemental progesterone has been reported to reduce the risk of preterm birth in some women with short cervix16-17. The frequent failure of cerclage to provide a physical “cure”, accompanied by the greater success of a biochemical intervention, is strong evidence that short cervix does not after all represent the lower end of a biological continuum of competence. It instead suggests that the parturition process often begins with cervical softening and ripening early in the second trimester if not earlier. Further evidence to support “short cervix = parturition has begun” comes from a re-analysis of the cervical length data from the Prediction Study (Figure 2) showing that cervical shortening precedes spontaneous preterm birth at a similar rate for 4 or more weeks, regardless of the eventual clinical presentation as preterm labor or preterm PROM18.

Figure 2
Rate of cervical change by phenotype of preterm birth

The effect of progesterone supplementation to reduce the risk of preterm birth in women with short cervix is apparently related primarily to its effect on cervical softening offering further support for the conclusion that short cervix is evidence that parturition has begun. The specific changes in the appearance of the cervix as parturition progresses should be understood as clues to the cause(s) and progression of preterm parturition.

Cervical Shortening Described

The progression of changes in the cervix during the course of parturition has been visualized with the help of transvaginal sonography. Zilianti et al described the temporal sequence of cervical changes and described the change as T, Y, V and U19. As the cervix effaces, the relationship of the cervical canal to the lower uterine segment changes from a T to the notched Y19. With further effacement, the Y becomes a V and ultimately a U (Figure 3). This sequence is recalled by residents at the Ohio State University Medical Center by the mnemonic Trust Your Vaginal Ultrasound.

Figure 3
Progressive cervical effacement seen sonographically

Funneling

Early studies recognized the development of the “triangular appearance” to the internal cervical os, a finding commonly referred to as funneling. (Figure 4). The width and the length of the funnel have been measured in several studies to evaluate their importance in predicting preterm birth. In an observational study of 183 women where TV sonography was performed, a cervical length of < 25 mm was significantly associated with PTB < 35 weeks while the presence of funneling was not a significant predictor of preterm birth15. Another study involving 590 ultrasounds replicated the finding that funneling does not significantly improve the prediction of premature birth when used in conjunction with CL measurments20. Specifically, among those women with a CL < 25 mm, the gestational age at delivery was not statistically significant in those with (30.6 weeks) versus those without a funnel (31.9 weeks (p = 0.59)20. Therefore, the presence or absence of a funnel does not significantly improve the ability to predict PTB. That said, funneling is part of the “T-Y-V-U” progression of cervical effacement and is certainly a window into the parturition process.

Figure 4
Diagram of cervical funneling

Infection/inflammation correlation

The etiology of preterm parturition is both multifactorial and complex but intrauterine infection/inflammation is strongly associated with premature birth. The role of infection and inflammation in preterm parturition was assessed in one study where IL-8 concentrations from cervical secretions were compared with CL measurements in women presenting between 24-36 weeks with preterm contractions21. Amniocentesis was performed on all women along with placental pathology to assess for the presence of histological chorioamnionitis. A short CL was significantly associated with both higher IL-8 concentrations and a positive amniotic fluid culture, linking infection and a short cervix. A prospective cohort study of all women between 22-35 weeks less than 3 cm dilated, assessed the relationship between CL and amniocentesis cultures22. The overall prevalence of PTB ≤ 35 weeks was 21.4% with positive cultures seen in 7% of the women. The most common organism identified in amniotic fluid cultures was Ureaplasma urealyticum. Women with a CL of < 15 mm had a significantly higher percentage of positive amniotic fluid cultures (26.3%) compared to those with a CL > 15 mm (3.8%). Of those with a CL ≥ 30 mm, only 1.9% had a positive amniotic fluid culture. Regression analysis revealed that the strongest predictor for a positive amniotic fluid culture was a short cervical length22. The authors also replicated the increased risk of premature delivery before 35 weeks in the setting of a short cervix22. It would appear then that a short cervical length is associated with a higher likelihood of intrauterine infection and inflammation but the causal relationship is less certain. A likely explanation is that a short cervix can potentially expose the membranes to the vaginal milieu leading to colonization and infection.

Debris

Debris, also called sludge, may be visualized overlying the internal os at the time of CL measurements which is thought to be a microbial biofilm (Figure 5) The relationship between debris and premature birth was investigated in a retrospective review of 281 women at risk for PTB who had a CL performed23. Debris was present in 23.5% (66/281) of patients and a CL < 25 mm was noted in 50.5% (142/281)23. After controlling for a short cervix and prior PTB, the presence of debris was significantly associated with a short diagnosis-to-delivery interval (HR 2.96 with 95% CI 1.6-5.3). Almost 70% of women with debris delivered before 32 weeks compared to 24.2% in those without debris. There were significantly higher rates of clinical and histological chorioamnionitis in women with debris. Debris appears to be a marker of microbial invasion as well as an independent risk factor for PTB in the setting of a short cervix but at this time management of a short CL should not be appreciably altered by the presence of debris.

Figure 5
Debris seen in the lower uterine segment, at the internal os

Interventions

Transvaginal ultrasonography has most commonly been used to assess the risk for premature delivery in women with historical risk factors for preterm birth. Use as a screening test has been limited by the absence of an effective intervention for women who test positive. Investigators have looked at several treatment modalities for women identified to have a short cervix on ultrasound, including indomethacin, cerclage and progesterone supplementation12-17, 24.

Cerclage placement with history of preterm birth

The use of transvaginal sonographic measurements of CL as a means to guide placement of an ultrasound-indicated cerclage for the prevention of recurrent PTB has been the subject of several studies. In an early non-randomized study of women with a CL ≤ 15 mm, the authors found that percentage of premature births (categorized as < 28, < 32, < 34 and < 37 weeks) was not significantly different between those with and without a cerclage25. The analysis was not sufficiently powered to detect a difference in reduction in the percentage of premature births, though25. To et al investigated the role of a Shirodkar cerclage in low and high risk women with a CL of ≤ 15 mm13. Out of 47,123 women who were screened, 253 met entry criteria with 127 women receiving cerclage and 126 women having expectant management. Cerclage placement was not associated with a reduction in premature birth with a RR of 0.84 (95% CI 0.54, 1.31)26. A number of studies have looked at prophylactic versus ultrasound-indicated cerclage placement. In a retrospective cohort study of 138 women at high risk for PTB, 57 had placement of an ultrasound-indicated cerclage when the CL was < 20 mm before 24 weeks gestation26. The authors found that there was no difference in the median gestational age at delivery, the percentage of PTB or in the percentage of PTB < 25 weeks gestation between the prophylactic and the ultrasound-indicated group. A prospective cohort study of 380 women at increased risk of PTB investigated the predictive indicators of success in ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage27. The indications for placement of the cerclage were a CL < 15 mm, a CL < 25 mm with progressive shortening or funneling greater than 50%. The authors found that visible membranes and a CL < 15 mm were significantly associated with an earlier gestational age at delivery, a lower fetal survival rate and a shorter insertion-to-delivery interval. A matched case-control study by the same author compared elective cerclage placement to ultrasound-indicated cerclage among women at high risk for preterm birth28. Among those in the ultrasound-indicated group, only 36% went on to have a cerclage (indications for placement of the cerclage were a CL < 15 mm, a CL < 25 mm with progressive shortening or funneling greater than 50%). There was no difference in the median gestational age at delivery or the proportion of births < 24 weeks gestation. This study highlights the safety of serial ultrasonographic measurements when deciding whether to place a cerclage for prevention of PTB.

The NICHD Vaginal Ultrasound Cerclage Trial (VUCT) was the first and only randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage in women at high risk for PTB15. The VUCT randomized 301 women with a prior PTB < 34 weeks and a CL < 25 mm to expectant management or cerclage placement15. The primary outcome of delivery before 35 weeks gestation occurred in 32% of those with a cerclage versus 42% of those without (OR of 0.67 with 95% CI of 0.42 to 1.07). The regression model, though, found a significant interaction between cerclage and cervical length. Because of this finding, the authors performed a separate analysis of women with a cervical length < 15 mm. Of those women with a CL < 15 mm, cerclage placement was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of PTB with an OR of 0.23 (95% CI of 0.08 to 0.66). This article strengthens the utility of TV sonography in the management of women with prior PTB and can guide the clinician in determining whether to place an ultrasound-indicated cerclage. On the basis of the NICHD VUCT, we would recommend placement of cerclage in all women with a prior PTB who have a CL < 15 mm and would strongly consider it in women with a CL < 20 mm.

Cervical Sonography to Evaluate Women with Possible Preterm Labor

Cervical ultrasound can aid in the assessment of women presenting with complaints of premature contractions. A prospective study of 72 women presenting to a Labor and Delivery unit with the complaint of contractions evaluated the utility of TV sonography in assisting triaging of patients29. The authors found that both the presence of a funnel (which they referred to as “wedging”) and a short cervix were independent predictors of PTB < 37 weeks. As “wedging” had a sensitivity of 100% for detection of PTB, the authors concluded that TV sonography was useful in the evaluation of preterm labor. Several other studies have investigated TV sonography in the evaluation of women presenting to triage with premature contractions and have found that a CL > 30 mm generally excludes the likelihood of premature birth and such women may be discharged home. One prospective study involved performance of a digital exam and a CL measurement in women between 20 to 35 weeks gestation with contractions30. After controlling for confounding variables, the authors found that CL was the only significant predictor of PTB less than 37 weeks while digital examination was not. A prospective study followed women who had both CL measurements and a digital estimate of the CL31. Comparing women who delivered < 35 weeks gestation to those who did not, there was a significant difference between the groups in cervical length measured sonographically but not when assessed digitally. Women presenting between 24-36 weeks gestation with contractions and who were < 3 cm dilated with intact membranes had a CL measurement performed at the time of initial evaluation32. The authors found that a CL < 15 mm was significantly associated with an increased risk of delivery within 7 days. A follow-up study, controlling for gestational age, parity and use of tocolytics, found that a decrease in CL (measured continuously) was the only significant predictor of PTB within 7 days, 48 hours or before 35 weeks33. Women evaluated for premature labor using both fFN and CL had a triage evaluation time that was roughly 1 hour less than the group where neither modality was used when the CL was ≥ 30 mm (p = 0.004). The use of TV sonography can appreciably aid the practitioner in the diagnosis of preterm parturition.

Progesterone Supplementation

Women with no prior history of premature birth may have an incidental finding of a short CL on TV sonography and it can be unclear how to best manage these patients. Several studies have looked at the role of progesterone supplementation in the setting of a short cervix. Women, predominantly nulliparous, with a CL ≤ 15 mm between 20-25 weeks were randomized to 200 mg of daily vaginal progesterone versus placebo16. The authors found that progesterone was associated with a 44% reduction in the risk of PTB < 34 weeks which was statistically significant. A small secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial investigated the role of 90 mg of vaginal progesterone in women with a prior PTB and a CL < 28 mm between 16 and 23 weeks gestation34. The study found a significant reduction in the percentage of premature births before 32 weeks gestation which was the primary study outcome. Hassan et al. randomized 465 women, the majority with no prior PTB, who had a cervical length of 10 to 20 mm between 19 and 24 weeks gestation to either 90 mg of daily vaginal progesterone or placebo17. Even after controlling for risk factors associated with PTB, progesterone lowered the risk of PTB before 33 weeks by 48% (95% CI of 0.31 to 0.91). When investigating the subset of women who had no prior PTB, progesterone use was also associated with a lower risk of PTB (7.6 % for progesterone versus 15.3% for placebo, RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.90). Based on these findings, progesterone administration should be offered to asymptomatic women who are found to have a short CL on TV sonography.

Multiple Gestations

The use of TV sonography is incorporated into the management of multiple gestations despite the fact that interventions such as cerclage and progesterone are ineffective in multiple pregnancies. The Preterm Prediction Study measured a CL transvaginally at 24 weeks gestation in 147 women with twin pregnancies and found that a short cervix (< 25 mm) at 24 weeks was significantly associated with an increased risk of PTB35. The sensitivity and specificity for PTB < 35 weeks gestation was noted to be 29.8% and 89% respectively. In a prospective observational study of 87 women with a twin pregnancy who presented to triage with premature contractions between 24 to 36 weeks gestation, the authors found that when the CL was greater than 25 mm there were no cases of delivery within 7 days36. Despite some of the limitations of TV sonography in twin pregnancies, we believe that CL can play a role in guiding clinicians caring for twin pregnancies. Specifically, a long cervical length (greater than 25 mm) may safely reassure the clinician and can allow a patient to avoid being placed on bedrest.

Universal Cervical Length Screening

Whether to universally screen all pregnancies with TV sonography has been the subject of two recent publications. Cahill et. al. used a decision analysis to assess how cost effective universal screening of patients with TV sonography is compared to a risk-based screening approach37. Even over a wide variation of cost and outcome assumptions, universal screening was found to more cost effective than a risk-based approach. A similar cost-effectiveness analysis model compared “no screening” to “universal screening” of all singleton pregnancies with a single TV scan between 18-24 weeks gestation38. The model found a significant cost-savings for the universal screening approach, also under a large variation of assumptions. Pending further research regarding the safety of universal screening, though, our recommendation would be for a liberal selective screening over universal screening.

Cautionary Notes & Summary

In trained hands, cervical sonography can be an extremely useful tool, but it is not without its limitations. In a review of 60 ultrasound examinations of women who were at risk for PTB, the authors highlighted several of the problems encountered during CL measurement39. An artificial lengthening of the cervix due to excessive pressure on the transducer was the most commonly encountered problem, occurring in 12% of cases. An undeveloped lower uterine segment, primarily due to early gestational age at the time of measurement, occurred in 8% of cases. To ensure that TV sonography is optimally utilized, the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) has incorporated a number of these pitfalls in their certificate of competence. Practitioners can complete the FMF certification after performance of a short internet course and submission of two images of a normal and short cervix. Although TA sonography and digital examination are alternatives to TV sonography, they are less reliable in the prediction of PTB and prone to inaccuracies in assessment of cervical length4. Specifically, digital examination of the cervix to compute a Bishop's score has been studied in conjunction with CL measurements and the sensitivity and specificity are generally lower than that of transvaginal measurements in prediction of PTB40. Another study compared the interobserver reliability of digital and transvaginal estimates of CL with the former yielding 35% agreement and the latter 74% agreement41. Therefore, when available, transvaginal sonography is the preferred tool for assessment of cervical length.

The use of TV sonography has gained in popularity and many clinicians are experienced in the performance of it. Given the utility of progesterone and cerclage in the reduction of PTB in the setting of a short cervix, performance and/or knowledge of TV sonography is vital for all providers of obstetric care. Returning to the question of whether sonography of the cervix is necessary or useful, the abundance of literature supports its role in elucidating the mechanism of parturition and as a supplemental tool in the role of prevention of premature birth. Progressive cervical shortening, assessed via sonography, reveals the process of parturition as one of slow evolution. It is likely that future studies will continue to refine the definition of parturition and premature birth.

Acknowledgments

Source of Funding: None

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Bartolucci L, Hill WC, Katz M, et al. Ultrasonography in preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 May 1;149(1):52–6. [PubMed]
2. Andersen HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SD, et al. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;163(3):859–67. [PubMed]
3. Sonek JD, Iams JD, Blumenfeld M, et al. Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Aug;76(2):172–5. [PubMed]
4. Andersen HF. Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound. 1991 Feb;19(2):77–83. [PubMed]
5. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 29;334(9):567–72. [PubMed]
6. Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, et al. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Nov;12(5):312–7. [PubMed]
7. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, et al. The Preterm Prediction Study: recurrence risk of spontaneous preterm birth. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 May;178(5):1035–40. [PubMed]
8. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, et al. The preterm prediction study: can low-risk women destined for spontaneous preterm birth be identified? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Mar;184(4):652–5. [PubMed]
9. Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, et al. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA. 2001 Sep 19;286(11):1340–8. [PubMed]
10. Iams JD, Johnson FF, Sonek J, et al. Cervical competence as a continuum: a study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Apr;172(4 Pt 1):1097–103. discussion 104-6. [PubMed]
11. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):1091–9. [PubMed]
12. Berghella V, Daly SF, Tolosa JE, et al. Prediction of preterm delivery with transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix in patients with high-risk pregnancies: does cerclage prevent prematurity? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;181(4):809–15. [PubMed]
13. To MS, Alfirevic Z, Heath VC, et al. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004 Jun 5;363(9424):1849–53. [PubMed]
14. Berghella V, Odibo AO, To MS, et al. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;106(1):181–9. [PubMed]
15. Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;201(4):375 e1–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Fonseca EB, Celik E, Parra M, et al. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 2;357(5):462–9. [PubMed]
17. Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Jul;38(1):18–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Iams JD, Cebrik D, Lynch C, et al. The Rate of Cervical Change and The Phenotype of Spontaneous Preterm Birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:130 e1–6. [PubMed]
19. Zilianti M, Azuaga A, Calderon F, et al. Monitoring the effacement of the uterine cervix by transperineal sonography: a new perspective. J Ultrasound Med. 1995 Oct;14(10):719–24. [PubMed]
20. Berghella V, Owen J, MacPherson C, et al. Natural history of cervical funneling in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;109(4):863–9. [PubMed]
21. Rizzo G, Capponi A, Vlachopoulou A, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of the uterine cervix and interleukin-8 concentrations in cervical secretions predict intrauterine infection in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Aug;12(2):86–92. [PubMed]
22. Gomez R, Romero R, Nien JK, et al. A short cervix in women with preterm labor and intact membranes: a risk factor for microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):678–89. [PubMed]
23. Kusanovic JP, Espinoza J, Romero R, et al. Clinical significance of the presence of amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;30(5):706–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Berghella V, Rust OA, Althuisius SM. Short cervix on ultrasound: does indomethacin prevent preterm birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;195(3):809–13. [PubMed]
25. Hassan SS, Romero R, Maymon E, et al. Does cervical cerclage prevent preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;184(7):1325–9. discussion 9-31. [PubMed]
26. Guzman ER, Forster JK, Vintzileos AM, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Nov;12(5):323–7. [PubMed]
27. Groom KM, Shennan AH, Bennett PR. Ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage: outcome depends on preoperative cervical length and presence of visible membranes at time of cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;187(2):445–9. [PubMed]
28. Groom KM, Bennett PR, Golara M, et al. Elective cervical cerclage versus serial ultrasound surveillance of cervical length in a population at high risk for preterm delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Feb 10;112(2):158–61. [PubMed]
29. Timor-Tritsch IE, Boozarjomehri F, Masakowski Y, et al. Can a “snapshot” sagittal view of the cervix by transvaginal ultrasonography predict active preterm labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Mar;174(3):990–5. [PubMed]
30. Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R, et al. Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;171(4):956–64. [PubMed]
31. Berghella V, Tolosa JE, Kuhlman K, et al. Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Oct;177(4):723–30. [PubMed]
32. Tsoi E, Akmal S, Rane S, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;21(6):552–5. [PubMed]
33. Tsoi E, Fuchs IB, Rane S, et al. Sonographic measurement of cervical length in threatened preterm labor in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;25(4):353–6. [PubMed]
34. DeFranco EA, O'Brien JM, Adair CD, et al. Vaginal progesterone is associated with a decrease in risk for early preterm birth and improved neonatal outcome in women with a short cervix: a secondary analysis from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;30(5):697–705. [PubMed]
35. Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Miodovnik M, et al. The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;175(4 Pt 1):1047–53. [PubMed]
36. Fuchs I, Tsoi E, Henrich W, et al. Sonographic measurement of cervical length in twin pregnancies in threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;23(1):42–5. [PubMed]
37. Cahill AG, Odibo AO, Caughey AB, et al. Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;202(6):548 e1–8. Epub 2010 Jan 15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Werner EF, Han CS, Pettker CM, et al. Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;38(1):32–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.8911. Epub 2011 May 24. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Yost NP, Bloom SL, Twickler DM, et al. Pitfalls in ultrasonic cervical length measurement for predicting preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;93(4):510–6. [PubMed]
40. Iams JD, Newman RB, Thom EA, et al. Frequency of uterine contractions and the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):250–5. [PubMed]
41. Goldberg J, Newman RB, Rust PF. Interobserver reliability of digital and endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Oct;177(4):853–8. [PubMed]