The main findings of this prospective pilot study of the neuropsychological outcomes of RS for MTLE were that cognitive measures of dominant hemisphere function, cognitive efficiency and mental flexibility, self-assessed depression, and measures of QOL remained stable at interim (12 month) and final (24 month) postoperative time points. In addition, QOL improved most markedly in those patients in whom seizures remitted and in those with the longest duration of seizure remission. These findings suggest that the morbidities of RS for MTLE in the domains of cognition, mood, and QOL are not substantially different than those expected for standard epilepsy surgery.
The description of serial changes in cognitive scores complement our earlier report in which we used reliable change indices to calculate that 25% of patients experienced significant changes of verbal memory after dominant hemisphere RS (
Barbaro, et al. 2009). In comparison, 60% of dominant hemisphere anterior temporal lobectomy patients decline on at least one test of verbal memory when measured with relative change indices (
Stroup, et al. 2003). Our findings of relative mean score changes of a 5±35% decrease in the CVLT and a 36±71% improvement in the WMSR compare favorably or remain within ranges (10-60%) reported after anterior temporal lobectomy (
Chelune and Najm 2000,
Hermann, et al. 1995,
Hermann, et al. 1992,
Seidenberg, et al. 1998,
Stroup, et al. 2003). Evaluating the relative cognitive risks among surgical procedures is difficult because selection criteria and assessments differ. The findings of preservation of language and verbal memory may be explained in part by the “superselective” nature of the RS lesion. For example, some studies show that the more anatomically-limited resection of selective amygdala-hippocampectomy, as compared to anterior temporal lobectomy, leads to less impairment of dominant-hemisphere cognition (
Clusmann, et al. 2002,
Helmstaedter, et al. 2003) (
Little, et al. 2009), although other studies show no clear advantages with more restricted resection (
Jones-Gotman, et al. 1997,
Wyler, et al. 1995). In addition, the noninvasive lesion of RS may spare connections with lateral temporal cortex that are hypothesized to mediate verbal memory (
Ojemann and Dodrill 1985). The current findings supplement our earlier report in which we found no correlation of cognitive tests with the severity of transient, perilesional edema that peaks between 9-12 months and subsides thereafter (
Chang, et al. 2010). The TMT-A and TMT-B evaluations, however, suggested trends of mild transient impairment in cognitive efficiency and flexibility at 12 months corresponding to the period of peak edemas as well as when many subjects had continuing seizures. Transient cognitive impairment is not well-reported in RS literature (
Armstrong, et al. 2004). Based on our small cohort of patients, we present evidence that the severity of medial temporal lobe edema did not have transient effect on measures of cognition except for a relatively mild decrease in mental efficiency and mental flexibility. A larger trial currently underway will address this issue in detail.
There is limited information regarding neurocognitive effects of RS for MTLE. The only prospective, multicenter trial reports no significant cognitive changes through a two-year follow-up period (
Regis, et al. 2004), but details are not specified. A small case series found no group changes at six months follow-up, although some individuals showed decline in at least one cognitive domain (
Srikijvilaikul, et al. 2004). McDonald et al focused on cognitive outcomes on three patients stating that no consistent changes in cognition were found after dominant RS (
McDonald, et al. 2004). Each patient, however, showed decline on at least one measure of verbal memory. They concluded that cognitive changes following RS appeared similar to those of standard surgery. A potential confounder of these studies was that the RS dose of 20 Gy used in that study may be too small to effectively treat seizures within the limited time-span of follow-up (
Barbaro, et al. 2009,
Quigg and Barbaro 2008). Furthermore, the neuropsychological follow up period may have been too short given the latency of development of the radiosurgical lesion (
Barbaro, et al. 2009,
Chang, et al. 2010,
Regis, et al. 2004,
Regis, et al. 1999).
Self-assessed depression did not change. Patients may experience worsening of mood during acute and subacute recovery after anterior temporal lobectomy (
Carran, et al. 2003,
Devinsky, et al. 2005,
Glosser, et al. 2000,
Quigg, et al. 2003). Most experience overall improvements in mood in longer term follow up (
Devinsky, et al. 2005). One possible explanation for the finding that patients in the present study did not experience improvements in mood is that the time course of mood adjustment may differ between procedures, as most mood changes occur within the first six months after anterior temporal lobectomy (
Glosser, et al. 2000). Because the latency to seizure remission after RS ranges from ~9-18 months (
Barbaro, et al. 2009), improvements in mood may take longer to develop. We note that the rate of preoperative depression in the present study was less than half that reported in a prospective study of anterior temporal lobectomy (
Devinsky, et al. 2005). The preoperative BDI was administered after patients were enrolled but before RS. One explanation for the low rate of preoperative depression in the current study could be selection bias, because patients were not randomized for entry. Another possibility may be that a noninvasive procedure confers a reduced level of preoperative anxiety or mood disturbance whereas stress and fear of open surgery may contribute to perioperative depression (
Devinsky, et al. 2005). On the other hand, delays in seizure-remission may limit postoperative improvements in mood.
QOL data in this pilot study shed some light on the concern about the latency of seizure remission inherent in RS. In the present study, subjects who experienced seizure remission had significant improvements in QOL despite the delay in onset of effect. Nevertheless, longer seizure remission corresponded to improvements in QOL. The final improvements in QOL documented by the QOLIE-10 appear similar to those identified with the QOLIE-89 noted in earlier studies of psychological outcome (
Hermann, et al. 1989); patients in the best seizure-outcome group experience the greatest improvement in QOL measures. We note, however, that in a large, more recent study, initial gains in QOL appear early after open surgery regardless of seizure remission(
Spencer, et al. 2007). In the present study, latency to seizure remission and the absence of a longer postoperative recovery period after RS may combine in a fashion to facilitate the relatively larger improvements in the QOL domains of driving and work. Limitations in our comparisons arise from the abbreviated QOL tool used in the present study and in the small sample size.
Other limitations in general regarding this pilot study include the use of a limited subset of neuropsychological measures (albeit a battery upon which a variety of independent epilepsy centers could agree upon and which could be administered consistently). In addition, our inclusion/exclusion criteria included only those with hippocampal sclerosis; patients with other causes of temporal lobe epilepsy may be at more risk of deficits following temporal lobectomy (
Davies, et al. 1998) whether performed through standard surgery or radiosurgical methods. Other causes of temporal lobe epilepsy (especially those in which the “epileptic zone” extends beyond the limbic system) may not be suited for RS since seizure remission rates appear lower than those whose foci are clearly associated with hippocampal sclerosis (
Rheims, et al. 2008).
In summary, this report suggests that cognitive outcomes, mood, and QOL have similar postoperative courses as seen after open surgery. Based on our pilot data, we speculate that RS may incur no greater risk in neuropsychological outcome than open surgery and that delays in efficacy, inherent in the development of the RS lesion, do not prohibit improvements in QOL or result in an extra burden of depression. A prospective randomized trial of standard open surgery versus RS is currently underway and may provide further evidence regarding the effects of RS on neuropsychological functioning and whether cognitive abilities may be less adversely affected by RS relative to traditional open surgery.