PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Chembiochem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 October 15.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3517015
NIHMSID: NIHMS414773

Chemically Programmed Antibody is a Long-lasting and Potent Inhibitor of Influenza Neuraminidase

Globalization makes reoccurring influenza pandemics a probable health care concern for the foreseeable future.[1] Although vaccination plays a primary role in the prevention of influenza epidemics and pandemics, vaccines must be designed and produced in advance of the influenza season and cannot be supplied on-demand in response to virus mutation.[2] Thus, efficient anti-influenza drugs are as important as vaccination in epidemic management.[3] Currently, the neuraminidase inhibitors zanamivir (1)[4] and oseltamivir (2)[5] are the mainstay drugs for treatment of infected patients (Figure 1). Each must be administered twice-daily due to their rapid excretion from the body. Therefore, long-lasting and potent anti-influenza drugs are highly attractive alternatives for treatment of influenza infection as well as for prophylaxis.[6]

Figure 1
Structure of neuraminidase inhibitors used clinically.

We have developed a strategy to prepare chemically programmed antibodies that have the long half-life and effector function of the antibody and therapeutic activity of the conjugated small-molecule drug, peptide, or oligonucleotide (Figure 2).[7] The agent to be conjugated to the antibody is first functionalized with a β-lactam and then is selectively reacted with the low pKa lysine residues key to the catalytic activity of aldolase monoclonal antibody (mAb) 38C2 to form an amide bond. As part of a project aimed at developing novel anti-influenza agents and chemically programmed vaccine strategies, we have chemically programmed an antibody with a small molecule enzyme inhibitor that targets neuraminidase. Our goal was to create a novel potent neuraminidase inhibitor that maintains long-term systemic exposure with the potential for enhanced activity through antibody associated effector function and valency. To date, chemically programmed antibodies have not utilized enzyme inhibitors as specificity programming agents. Successful recruitment of enzyme inhibitors as programming agents would make a wide-range of enzyme inhibitors effective new therapeutic tools for targeting an immune response.

Figure 2
Generation of chemically programmed antibody. Site-specific conjugation of aldolase mAb 38C2 is performed by reacting the antibody with a chemical programming agent composed of b-lactam moiety and a small molecule, peptide, or oligonucleotide (indicated ...

Influenza virions present two virus-encoded glycoproteins on their surface that are the targets of vaccines and small molecule drugs. These are hemagglutinin, which is responsible for binding sialic acid and fusion to the host cell, and neuraminidase, which is a glycosidase responsible for de novo virion release and virus spread within the host organism.[8] Current vaccines rely on inducing potent antibody responses against particular hemagglutinin variants,[9] whereas small molecule drugs aim to inhibit the enzymatic activity of neuraminidase. Co-targeting of the immune response to both of these proteins might have favourable prophylactic and therapeutic effects, however, antibody targeting of neuraminidase through vaccination has not proven to be highly effective perhaps due to the antigenic variation of the surface of this enzyme.[10] In general, the active sites of enzymes tend to tolerate fewer mutations since catalytic activity must be retained, and they therefore present more stable targets as compared to the surface residues of an enzyme. Antibodies, however, are sterically constrained against reaching into the active sites of most enzymes, and to the best of our knowledge, antibodies that make direct contact with the catalytic residues of an enzyme are not known. Antibodies that block access to active sites are known,[11] however, such epitopes are more tolerant to mutations than the conserved catalytic residues of the enzyme. In order to explore the potential of antibodies that directly engage the conserved catalytic mechanism of an therapeutically significant enzyme, we selected zanamivir as the chemical programming agent because it maintains antiviral activity against oseltamivir-resistant mutant viruses.[12] Several groups have reported that dimeric, trimeric, tetrameric, and polymeric zanamivir derivatives linked through the C-7 position have long-acting and strong antiviral activities (Figure 3).[13] Moreover, C-7 alkyl modified analogues of zanamivir reported by Honda et al. retained their inhibitory activities against neuraminidase.[14] In the X-ray structure of a complex of zanamivir and neuraminidase, the 7-hydroxy group of zanamivir is directed toward solvent (Figure 4).[13d,15] Thus, we selected the 7-hydroxy group as the point for attachment of a β-lactam group and designed chemical programming agents 3a and 3b (Figure 5). The linker length is nearly 40 Å. Even though the lysine of mAb 38C2, LysH93, is located at the bottom of a narrow 11 Å-deep pocket, this linker should present the zanamivir targeting module in a manner that is unhindered by the antibody and accessible to the enzymatic active site of neuraminidase.[16]

Figure 3
Dimeric, trimeric, tetrameric, and polymeric neuraminidase inhibitors.
Figure 4
Binding mode of zanamivir to neuraminidase N9.
Figure 5
Design of chemical programming agents. The β-lactam moiety was linked to the 7-hydroxy group of zanamivir through two different linkers, each approximately 40 Å.

The syntheses of 3a and 3b are shown in Scheme 1. Starting material 4 was prepared as described.[13a] The 7-hydroxy group of compound 4 was activated with 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate and DMAP in pyridine, followed by the addition of amine 5a or 5b to give compound 6a or 6b, respectively. Deprotection of the Boc group with trifluoroacetic acid provided guanidine compounds 7a and 7b. Hydrolysis of methyl esters in 7a and 7b was performed with aqueous triethylamine. After reaction completion, the solution was neutralized with hydrochloric acid and lyophilized to give the corresponding carboxylic acids. The carboxylic acids then were used in the copper-catalyzed click reaction[17] with β-lactam molecule 8 to afford the target compounds 3a and 3b.

Scheme 1
Synthesis of programming agents 3a and 3b. Reagents and conditions: a) 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate, 5a or 5b, DMAP, pyridine, rt; 6a (63%) and 6b (67%); b) CF3CO2H, anisole, CH2Cl2, rt; 7a (91%) and 7b (40%); c) (i) Et3N, H2O, MeOH, rt; (ii) 8, CuSO4 ...

Formation of chemically programmed mAb 38C2 is shown in Figure 6. mAb 38C2 was incubated with chemical programming agent 3a or 3b (4 equiv) in 10 mM PBS (pH 7.4) at room temperature for 2 h. Complete conjugation between mAb 38C2 and chemical programming molecule was confirmed by loss of catalytic activity in the retro-aldol reaction.[18] Conjugates 9a and 9b did not catalyze the retro-aldol reaction of methodol, whereas the parent antibody did (Figure 7A). MALDI mass spectra of 9a and 9b in comparison to that of mAb 38C2 are shown in Figure 7B and 7C. The conjugates had masses indicative of conjugation of two agents per antibody (one agent linked to each active site lysine). ESI mass spectral studies of 9a and 9b also demonstrated that mAb 38C2 was conjugated to two molecules of 3a and 3b, respectively (see supporting information). The chemically programmed antibodies 9a and 9b bound to neuraminidase in an ELISA (Figure 7D and 7E), whereas the parent antibody mAb 38C2 did not.

Figure 6
Formation of chemically programmed mAb 38C2 targeting influenza neuraminidase.
Figure 7
Analysis of formation of 9a and 9b. A) Catalytic activity of 9a, 9b, and mAb 38C2 for retro-aldol reaction of methodol. B) Overlay of MALDI mass spectral of 9a (Mw = 152895, red) and mAb 38C2 (Mw = 151061, blue). C) Overlay of MALDI mass spectral of ...

Biological activities of 3a, 3b, 9a, 9b, and zanamivir are summarized in Table 1. Small molecules 3a and 3b exhibited weaker inhibitory activity against influenza A neuraminidase compared to zanamivir. The reduction in inhibitory activity is likely due to steric hindrance caused by the addition of the long linker at the C-7 position of zanamivir. This reduction in inhibitory activity of zanamivir derivatives modified at the 7-hydroxy group is consistent with other reports of zanamivir derivatives (for details, see supporting information). In contrast, chemically programmed antibodies 9a and 9b showed inhibitory activity similar to zanamivir. It is likely that antibody conjugation enhanced the binding with the enzyme by an avidity effect since each antibody displays two molecules of zanamivir and neuraminidase is a tetramer. We have previously noted large avidity-based increases in activity following antibody conjugation in other systems.[7] We selected the most potent chemically programmed antibody 9a for further evaluation. Chemically programmed antibody 9a was found to be more potent than zanamivir in a plaque reduction assay against influenza A/California/07/2009(H1N1) (Table 1). We believe the increase in potency of 9a over zanamivir in this virus-based assay is a product of the bivalency of 9a and may be due to crosslinking of the virus.

Table 1
Neuraminidase inhibition and plaque reduction activities of compounds 3a, 3b, 9a, and 9b.

A pharmacokinetics study was conducted in mice: Mice were given a single intravenous injection of 10 mg/kg of chemically programmed antibody 9a. The serum concentration of 9a was measured using a neuraminidase-specific ELISA. The previously reported elimination half-life of zanamivir after intravenous injection in mice is approximately 10 min.[4c] The chemically programmed antibody 9a had a dramatically prolonged half-life of 72 h, approximating the half-life of the antibody itself in this model. This improvement in half-life, when scaled in humans, might prevent influenza infection with once or twice monthly dosing.

In summary, this study indicates that by using an appropriately designed enzyme inhibitor, an effective chemically programmed antibody can be created from an established scaffold antibody effectively allowing an antibody to directly engage the conserved catalytic residues of an enzymes’ active site. The zanamirvir derivative reported here encourages the development of chemically programmed vaccination approaches[19] for influenza prophylaxis and therapy and opens up antibody targeting to a wide range of therapeutically relevant enzymes through the adaptation of known enzyme inhibitors.

Experimental Section

Experimental details and characterization are available in the Supporting Information.

Figure 8
Serum concentration of 9a following a single intravenous dose of 10 mg/kg in mouse (n=3).

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant Pioneer Award DP1 CA174426 and NIH Contract HHSN272200900047C.

References

1. a) Webby RJ, Webster RG. Science. 2003;302:1519–1522. [PubMed]b) Smith GJD, Vijaykrishna D, Bahl J, Lycett SJ, Worobey M, Pybus OG, Ma SK, Cheung CL, Raghwani J, Bhatt S, Peiris JSM, Guan Y, Rambaut A. Nature. 2009;459:1122–1125. [PubMed]c) Neumann G, Noda T, Kawaoka Y. Nature. 2009;459:931–939. [PubMed]d) Dawood FS, Jain S, Finelli L, Shaw MW, Lindstrom S, Garten RJ, Gubareva LV, Xu X, Bridges CB, Uyeki TM. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:2605–2615. [PubMed]e) Garten RJ, Davis CT, Russell CA, Shu B, Lindstrom S, Balish A, Sessions WM, Xu X, Skepner E, Deyde V, Okomo-Adhiambo M, Gubareva L, Barnes J, Smith CB, Emery SL, Hillman MJ, Rivailler P, Smagala J, de Graaf M, Burke DF, Fouchier RAM, Pappas C, Alpuche-Aranda CM, López-Gatell H, Olivera H, López I, Myers CA, Faix D, Blair PJ, Yu C, Keene KM, Dotson PD, Jr, Boxrud D, Sambol AR, Abid SH, St. George K, Bannerman T, Moore AL, Stringer DJ, Blevins P, Demmler-Harrison GJ, Ginsberg M, Kriner P, Waterman S, Smole S, Guevara HF, Belongia EA, Clark PA, Beatrice ST, Donis R, Katz J, Finelli L, Bridges CB, Shaw M, Jernigan DB, Uyeki TM, Smith DJ, Klimov AI, Cox NJ. Science. 2009;325:197–201. [PubMed]f) Itoh Y, Shinya K, Kiso M, Watanabe T, Sakoda Y, Hatta M, Muramoto Y, Tamura D, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Noda T, Sakabe S, Imai M, Hatta Y, Watanabe S, Li C, Yamada S, Fujii K, Murakami S, Imai H, Kakugawa S, Ito M, Takano R, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Shimojima M, Horimoto T, Goto H, Takahashi K, Makino A, Ishigaki H, Nakayama M, Okamatsu M, Takahashi K, Warshauer D, Shult PA, Saito R, Suzuki H, Furuta Y, Yamashita M, Mitamura K, Nakano K, Nakamura M, Brockman-Schneider R, Mitamura H, Yamazaki M, Sugaya N, Suresh M, Ozawa M, Neumann G, Gern J, Kida H, Ogasawara K, Kawaoka Y. Nature. 2009;460:1021–1025. [PubMed]
2. Gerdil C. Vaccine. 2003;21:1776–1779. [PubMed]
3. a) Hayden FG. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2004;23:S262–S269. [PubMed]b) Moscona A. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:1363–1373. [PubMed]
4. a) von Itzstein M, Wu W-Y, Kok GB, Pegg MS, Dyason JC, Jin B, Phan TV, Smythe ML, White HF, Oliver SW, Colman PM, Varghese JN, Ryan DM, Woods JM, Bethell RC, Hotham VJ, Cameron JM, Penn CR. Nature. 1993;363:418–423. [PubMed]b) Woods JM, Bethell RC, Coates JA, Healy N, Hiscox SA, Pearson BA, Ryan DM, Ticehurst J, Tilling J, Walcott SM, Penn CR. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1473–1479. [PubMed]c) Ryan DM, Ticehurst J, Dempsey MH, Penn CR. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2270–2275. [PubMed]d) Hayden FG, Treanor JJ, Betts RF, Lobo M, Esinhart JD, Hussey EK. JAMA. 1996;275:295–299. [PubMed]
5. a) Kim CU, Lew W, Williams MA, Liu H, Zhang L, Swaminathan S, Bischofberger N, Chen MS, Mendel DB, Tai CY, Laver WG, Stevens RC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:681–690. [PubMed]b) Kim CU, Lew W, Williams MA, Wu H, Zhang L, Chen X, Escarpe PA, Mendel DB, Laver WG, Stevens RC. J. Med. Chem. 1998;41:2451–2460. [PubMed]c) Mendel DB, Tai CY, Escarpe PA, Li W, Sidwell RW, Huffman JH, Sweet C, Jakeman KJ, Merson J, Lacy SA, Lew W, Williams MA, Zhang L, Chen MS, Bischofberger N, Kim CU. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998;42:640–646. [PubMed]
6. a) Honda T, Kubo S, Masuda T, Arai M, Kobayashi Y, Yamashita M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009;19:2938–2940. [PubMed]b) Honda T, Masuda T, Yoshida S, Arai M, Kobayashi Y, Yamashita M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002;12:1921–1924. [PubMed]c) Kubo S, Tomozawa T, Kakuta M, Tokumitsu A, Yamashita M. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1256–1264. [PubMed]d) Kiso M, Kubo S, Ozawa M, Le QM, Nidom CA, Yamashita M, Kawaoka Y. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6 e1000786. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Rader C, Sinha SC, Popkov M, Lerner RA, Barbas CF, III Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:5396–5400. [PubMed]
Rader C, Turner JM, Heine A, Shabat D, Sinha SC, Wilson IA, Lerner RA, Barbas CF, III J. Mol. Biol. 2003;332:889–899. [PubMed]
Popkov M, Rader C, Gonzalez B, Sinha SC, Barbas CF, III Int. J. Cancer. 2006;119:1194–1207. [PubMed]
Gavrilyuk JI, Wuellner U, Barbas CF, III Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009;19:1421–1424. [PubMed]
Gavrilyuk JI, Wuellner U, Salahuddin S, Goswami RK, Sinha SC, Barbas CF, III Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009;19:3716–3720. [PubMed]
Gavrilyuk J, Uehara H, Otsubo N, Hessell A, Burton DR, Barbas CF, III ChemBioChem. 2010;11:2113–2118. [PubMed]
Doppalapudi VR, Tryder N, Li L, Aja T, Griffith D, Liao FF, Roxas G, Ramprasad MP, Bradshaw C, Barbas CF, III Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007;17:501–506. [PubMed]
Wuellner U, Gavrilyuk JI, Barbas CF, III Angew. Chem. 2010;122:6070–6073. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2010, 49, 5934–5937.
For related studies using a noncovalent approach, see: Parker CG, Domaoal RA, Anderson KS, Spiegel DA J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:16392–16394. [PubMed]
Murelli RP, Zhang AX, Michel J, Jorgensen WL, Spiegel DA J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:17090–17092. [PubMed]
8. Gamblin SJ, Skehel JJ. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:28403–28409. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. a) Ellebedy AH, Webby RJ. Vaccine. 2009;27:D65–D68. [PubMed]b) Chen J-R, Ma C, Wong C-H. Trends Biotechnol. 2011;29:426–434. [PubMed]c) Han T, Marasco WA. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011;1217:178–190. [PubMed]
10. Powers DC, Kilbourne ED, Johansson BE. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 1996;3:511–516. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Colman PM. Protein Sci. 1994;3:1687–1696. [PubMed]
12. a) Collins PJ, Haire LF, Lin YP, Liu J, Russell RJ, Walker PA, Skehel JJ, Martin SR, Hay AJ, Gamblin SJ. Nature. 2008;453:1258–1262. [PubMed]b) von Itzstein M. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007;6:967–974. [PubMed]
13. a) Macdonald SJF, Cameron R, Demaine DA, Fenton RJ, Foster G, Gower D, Hamblin JN, Hamilton S, Hart GJ, Hill AP, Inglis GGA, Jin B, Jones HT, McConnell DB, McKimm-Breschkin J, Mills G, Nguyen V, Owens IJ, Parry N, Shanahan SE, Smith D, Watson KG, Wu W-Y, Tucker SP. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:2964–2971. [PubMed]b) Watson KG, Cameron R, Fenton RJ, Gower D, Hamilton S, Jin B, Krippner GY, Luttick A, McConnell D, MacDonald SJF, Mason AM, Nguyen V, Tucker SP, Wu W-Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004;14:1589–1592. [PubMed]c) Honda T, Yoshida S, Arai M, Masuda T, Yamashita M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002;12:1929–1932. [PubMed]d) Masuda T, Yoshida S, Arai M, Kaneko S, Yamashita M, Honda T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2003;51:1386–1398. [PubMed]e) Lu Y, Gervay-Hague J. Carbohydr. Res. 2007;342:1636–1650. [PubMed]f) Macdonald SJF, Watson KG, Cameron R, Chalmers DK, Demaine DA, Fenton RJ, Gower D, Hamblin JN, Hamilton S, Hart GJ, Inglis GGA, Jin B, Jones HT, McConnell DB, Mason AM, Nguyen V, Owens IJ, Parry N, Reece PA, Shanahan SE, Smith D, Wu W-Y, Tucker SP. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004;48:4542–4549. [PubMed]
14. Honda T, Masuda T, Yoshida S, Arai M, Kaneko S, Yamashita M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002;12:1925–1928. [PubMed]
15. Varghese JN, Epa VC, Colman PM. Protein Sci. 1995;4:1081–1087. [PubMed]
16. Zhu X, Tanaka F, Lerner RA, Barbas CF, III, Wilson IA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:18206–18207. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. a) Chan TR, Hilgraf R, Sharpless KB, Fokin VV. Org. Lett. 2004;6:2853–2855. [PubMed]b) Rodionov VO, Presolski SI, Gardinier S, Lim YH, Finn MG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:12696–12704. [PubMed]c) Hong V, Presolski SI, Ma C, Finn MG. Angew. Chem. 2009;121:10063–10067. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2009, 48, 9879–9883.
18. Sinha SC, Das S, Li LS, Lerner RA, Barbas CF., III Nat. Protoc. 2007;2:449–456. [PubMed]
19. Popkov M, Gonzalez B, Sinha SC, Barbas CF., III Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:4378–4383. [PubMed]