PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of tropmedLink to Publisher's site
 
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 November 7; 87(5): 883–887.
PMCID: PMC3516264

The Development of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method (LAMP) for Echinococcus granulosis Coprodetection

Abstract

We have previously developed a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for detection of Echinococcus granulosus infection, which proved very sensitive and specific for identification of infected dogs. We have now developed a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, which amplifies the same genomic repeated sequences of E. granulosus for coprodetection. This assay enabled detection of a single egg in fecal samples and showed high species specificity for E. granulosus with no cross-amplification of DNA from closely related helminths, including Echinococcus multilocularis. Because the method does not require thermocycling for DNA amplification, or electrophoresis for amplicon detection, it can potentially be used for premortem identification of E. granulosus-infected dogs to enable large-scale surveys in endemic countries where highly specialized equipment to undertake PCR analysis is rare.

Introduction

Cystic echinococcosis or cystic hydatidosis is a chronic helminthic zoonotic disease caused by the larval stage of the tapeworm, Echinococcus granulosus. The disease has a cosmopolitan distribution,1,2 and is especially prevalent in sheep-raising countries3; the life cycle of this parasite is perpetuated between definitive hosts, the domestic dog and a wide range of ungulates, like herbivorous livestock, which serve as intermediate hosts. Humans become infected by the accidental ingestion of eggs that give rise to hydatid cysts mainly in the liver and lungs. In view of the great economic importance of this disease in the livestock industry and the impact it has on human health, it is very important to be able to assess disease transmission dynamics in the canine population and to evaluate hydatid control programs.

Gold standard detection of E. granulosus in dogs has always been at post mortem on necropsy material. Although this method is highly sensitive, it is laborious, raises ethical issues, and is biohazardous1; unfortunately, simple microscopical detection of worm eggs in fecal samples by routine coprological flotation is not useful because eggs of all species of the family Taenidae (genera Echinococcus and Taenia) are morphologically indistinguishable from one another. Coproantigen diagnosis for canine echinococcosis have been described by several groups.48 However, sensitivity of this method is relatively limited, resulting in an overall average test sensitivity of ~60% for natural canine E. granulosus infection.

Echinococcus DNA from proglottids, eggs, or sequestered infected cells excreted in feces can be detected after amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers that amplify regions of the 12S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene9,10 or, as was previously done, by detection of a tandem repeat sequence (the Hae III repeat) within the parasite genome.11 Although copro-PCR detection of parasitic material is generally sensitive and/or specific for Echinococcus diagnosis,12 many countries that are endemic for E. granulosus do not possess elaborate, well-equipped laboratories for PCR and gel analysis. Thus, it is extremely important that alternate, user friendly, robust, and accurate detection methods be developed for parasite detection. These should be accessible to medical and veterinary personnel to enable their widespread use for disease surveillance and control.

The loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method is a nucleic acid amplification test used in various fields, including infection diagnosis to identify organisms. This assay uses a DNA polymerase called Bst polymerase, which has strand displacement activity and a set of four (or six) specially designed primers that recognize a total of six distinct sequences of the target DNA.13 It has been used to perform highly specific and sensitive amplifications of DNA to detect pathogens including viruses, bacteria, protozoa, helminths, and fungi. Recently, this technique has proven to be very useful in the diagnosis of parasitic infections, such as malaria, trypanosomiasis, dirofilariasis, schistosomiasis, and babesiosis.1419 Because this method has been able to amplify DNA as soon as 1–2 hours at a single incubation temperature, with only a water bath and ice needed as equipment, this method would appear potentially ideal for field purposes.

The authors of a recent comparative analytical study that evaluated the three previously mentioned copro-PCR methods concluded that the copro-PCR based on a tandem repeat target sequence, which we had previously described,11 was the best method for species differentiation of E. granulosus from E. multilocularis and other taeniids,12 we have now developed a sensitive and specific LAMP based on PCR primers derived from the same repeated sequence.11

Materials and Methods

Feces and parasites.

Negative fecal samples used in spiking experiments were taken from an indoor housed domestic dog that had been dewormed on 3 biweekly separate occasions with a commercially available broad spectrum anthelmintic containing praziquantel, pyrantel pamoate, and febantel (Drontal Plus, Bayer, Pittsburgh, PA). A subsequent fecal flotation examination for helminth eggs after the deworming program was also negative from the dog. Fecal samples were stored at −20°C until used.

Echinococcus granulosus eggs were isolated from worms collected from infected dogs, and E. granulosus DNA was extracted from protoscolesces recovered from affected livers of locally slaughtered sheep. The strain of the parasite we have studied is assumed to be the common sheep strain (G1), as clarified in the Discussion. These were used for sensitivity and specificity spiking experiments.

Worms from Spirocerca lupi, Taenia sps., Fasciola sps., Toxocara canis, and Dipylidium caninum (kindly donated by Dr. Marcovics, Kimron, Veterinary Institute, Bet Dagan, Israel), and DNA from Neospora caninum (kindly donated by Dr. Schares, Institute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Wusterhauzen, Germany) and E. multilocularis (kindly donated by Dr. Craig, University of Salford, UK) were obtained for specificity tests.

DNA extraction methods.

DNA from parasites provided for specificity tests was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue extraction kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).

For free DNA and egg spiking into fecal material, the PSP Spin Stool DNA Plus extraction Kit (Invitek, Berlin, Germany) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two hundred milligrams of fecal material was included in each sample.

Primers.

Primers for the LAMP were designed by using the Eiken Genome site (http://primerexplorer.jp/elamp3.0.0/index.html). Sequences of the four primers used for the LAMP are shown in Table 1. The LAMP primers were designed according to E. granulosus repeat region sequence, accession no., DQ157697.

Table 1
Sequence of primers for LAMP reaction

LAMP assays.

The reaction mixture of 25 μL contained primers (40 pmol of FIP1ech and BIP1ech and 10 pmol of Eg1121a and Eg1122a outer primers), 8 units of BstI large fragment, 0.4 mM dNTPs, 1M Betaine; 1 × reaction buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 10 mM KCl, 10 mM [NH4]2 SO4, 8 mM MgSO4, and 1% Tween 20), and 5 μL of target DNA from E. granulosus, other parasites or sterile double distilled water (ddw) for negative controls. The reaction was incubated at 60°C in a water bath or thermocycler (MJ Research Inc., Waltham, MA) for 2 hours.

Amplicon detection.

Detection of LAMP-amplified products was performed by using SYBR Green I stain (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). One microliter of 1:10 diluted SYBR Green I was added to the reaction mixture (25 μL). When using SYBR Green at a dilution of 1:10, amplicons could be detected directly by the unaided eye because the color of the reaction solution changed from orange to green in the presence of LAMP amplicon. Amplicon analysis by standard gel electrophoresis on 1.1% ethidium bromide agarose gels alongside a pUC Mix Marker 8 (Fermentas, Lithuania), and a positive and negative control was carried out in parallel with SYBR Green staining for quality control.

Results

LAMP amplification of E. granulosus DNA for determining detection sensitivity.

Serial 10-fold dilutions of E. granulosus genomic DNA were amplified by LAMP using LAMP primers (Table 1). The results of this amplification experiment are shown in Figure 1A and B after amplicon examination by agarose gel electrophoresis and staining with SYBR Green. Detection sensitivity of this assay was 100 fg DNA/200 μL in double distilled water (ddw).

Figure 1.
(A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of loop isothermal amplified products (LAMP) from different amounts of Echinococcus granulosus genomic DNA added to 200 μL of double distilled water. L = pUC molecular mass marker; Lane 1 = 1 ng; Lane 2 = 100 pg; ...

Detection specificity of the LAMP assay in ddw.

All the DNA extracts from the various parasites tested were initially shown to contain a sufficient amount of DNA for PCR by spectrophotometry (NanoDrop-ND1000, Wilmington, DE). Furthermore, DNA analysis was shown to contain a minimal amount of salts before specificity testing was undertaken. Species specificity of the LAMP primers was shown by successful amplification of E. granulosus and a failure of amplification of Fasciola sps., Toxocara canis, E. multilocularis, Spirocerca lupi, Taenia sps., N. caninum, and Dipylidium caninum, on agarose gel electrophoresis and staining with SYBR Green (Figure 2A and B). The capacity of LAMP to specifically detect E. granulosus was thus shown. This substantiates preliminary specificity of the test.

Figure 2.
(A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of LAMP amplified products showing specificity for Echinococcus granulosus. L = pUC ladder; Lane 1 = 1 ng E. granulosus; Lane 2 = 5 ng E. multilocularis; Lane 3 = 5 ng Toxocara canis; Lane 4 = 5 ng Taenia spp.; Lane 5 = ...

LAMP amplification of E. granulosus for determining DNA detection sensitivity in spiked feces.

Serial 10-fold dilutions of E. granulosus genomic DNA in Echinococcus-negative fecal material were amplified by LAMP. The results of this amplification experiment are shown in Figure 3 after amplicon examination by agarose gel electrophoresis. Detection sensitivity of this assay was 1 pg/200 mg feces.

Figure 3.
Agarose gel electrophoresis of LAMP products after amplification of serial dilutions of Echinococcus granulosus DNA in fecal spikes. L = pUC marker; Lanes 1–5 = E. granulosus DNA spikes into 200 mg negative canine feces; Lane 1 = 5 ng; Lane 2 ...

LAMP amplification of E. granulosus for determining egg detection sensitivity in spiked feces.

Figure 4A and B show the LAMP detection results of spiking experiments after which high and low numbers of eggs, consecutively, were spiked per fecal sample. As few as 1 E. granulosus egg could be detected in 3 out of 6 (50%) 200 mg fecal spikes by the LAMP method. It should be emphasized that egg numbers were determined by dilution without confirming the actual number per tube.

Figure 4.
(A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of LAMP products using high numbers of Echinococcus granulosus eggs/fecal spike. L = pUC marker; Lanes 1–4 = E. granulosus egg spikes into 200 mg negative canine feces; Lane 1 = 1–2 E. granulosus eggs; Lane ...

Discussion

Although the gold standard for E. granulosus coprodetection in dogs has been traditionally based on parasitological detection of adult worms at necropsy or after arecoline purgation, this method is too laborious, expensive, bio-hazardous, and may cause ethical issues. Furthermore, the simple test of light microscopy following fecal flotation is unable to morphologically distinguish between eggs of all species of the family Taenidae.18 Although coproantigen tests have been developed, their sensitivity is somewhat limited and they are only genus specific.48 In addition, the Echinotest is not commercially available caused by a shortage of high quality antigen (Veermeer E, personal communication, EMEA). Copro-PCR methods are available and are quite sensitive and/or specific. However, laboratories need specialized equipment for their testing and at least 3 hours is required for completion of DNA amplification and electrophoresis agarose gel analysis. Thus, the requirement for a simpler, cheaper, yet sensitive and specific E. granulosus coprodetection method is necessary, especially in regions that have concurrent E. multilocularis or other taeniid infections.

The E. granulosus strain from which the Hae III repeat was isolated11 is believed to be the common sheep strain. Because the LAMP is based on the Hae III repeat sequence described by Abbasi and others,11 which is shared by DNA of E. granulosus collected from horse, camel, cattle, or goat hydatid protoscoleces,12,20 this test, which was not designed to differentiate between various E. granulosus genotypes, can be expected to be suitable for large-scale testing of dogs for wide coverage of E. granulosus infection. This notion is further strengthened by the finding that all tested dogs from Jordan, from which worms were recovered, were PCR positive by amplifying the Hae III repeat.11 Furthermore, in a work by Boufani and others,12 the said PCR assay was determined to identify the common sheep strain.

The LAMP method can be performed within 2 hours under isothermal conditions by using a simple incubator, such as a water bath or a block heater. There is no need for agarose gel electrophoresis for visual evaluation of the test results. Results can be immediately visualized and examined visually judged by adding SYBR Green I stain to the amplified mixes to distinguish a positive LAMP reaction from a negative reaction.

Our test can have great potential in developing countries, where the disease is endemic and equipment and expert technical staff is scarce. It should be recalled in this context that LAMP has already been established in field laboratories for tuberculosis21 and for Schistosomiasis (Hamburger and others, unpublished data). Its application in large-scale epidemiological studies and surveillance of echinococcosis in canine deworming control programs should be significant.

The sensitivity, specificity, and operational simplicity of LAMP could make it easily applicable for a clinical practice and for epidemiological surveys in areas of disease endemicity, especially in developing countries. It is hoped that further work in the search for cheaper DNA extraction methods from fecal material may allow this test to be a more cost-effective assay for widespread usage.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank A. Marcovics (Kimron Veterinary Institute, Bet Dagan, Israel), G. Schares (Institute of Epidemiology, Friedrich- Loeffler-Institut, Wusterhauzen, Germany), and P. Craig (University of Salford, U.K) for providing test material.

Footnotes

Authors' addresses: Harold Salant, Ibrahim Abbasi, and Joseph Hamburger, Department of Molecular Genetics, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel, E-mails: tsvis/at/ekmd.huji.ac.il, ibrahima/at/ekmd.huji.ac.il, and hambu/at/cc.huji.ac.il.

References

1. WHO In: WHO/OIE Manual on Echinococcosis in Humans and Animals: a Public Health Problem of Global Concern. Eckert J, Gemmel MA, Meslin FX, Pawlowski ZS, editors. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. pp. 1–263.
2. Eckert J, Conraths FJ, Tackmann K. Echinococcosis: an emerging or re-emerging zoonosis? Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:1283–1294. [PubMed]
3. Craig PS, Rogan MT, Allan JC. Detection, screening and community epidemiology of taeniid cestode zoonoses: cystic echinococcosis, alveolar echinococcosis and neurocysticercosis. Adv Parasitol. 1996;38:169–250. [PubMed]
4. Allan JC, Craig PS, Garcia Novel J, Mencos F, Liu D, Wang Y, Wen H, Zhou P, Stringer R, Rogan M, Zeyhle E. Coproantigen detection for immunodiagnosis of echinococcosis and taeniasis in dogs and humans. Parasitology. 1992;104:347–356. [PubMed]
5. Deplazes P, Jimenez-Palacios S, Gottstein B, Skaggs J, Eckert J. Detection of Echinococcus coproantigens in stray dogs of northern Spain. Appl Parasitol. 1994;35:297–301. [PubMed]
6. Malgor R, Nonaka N, Basmadjian I, Sakai H, Carambula B, Oku Y, Carmona C, Kamiya M. Coproantigen detection in dogs experimentally and naturally infected with Echinococcus granulosus by a monoclonal antibody-based enzyme–linked immunosorbent assay. Int J Parasitol. 1997;27:1605–1612. [PubMed]
7. Moro PL, Bonifacia N, Gilman RH, Lopera L, Silva B, Takumoto R, Verastegui M, Cabrera L. Field diagnosis of Echinococcus granulosus infection among intermediate and definitive hosts in an endemic focus of human cystic echinococcosis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999;93:611–615. [PubMed]
8. Casaravilla C, Malgor R, Rossi A, Sakai H, Nonaka N, Kamiya M, Carmona C. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against excretory/secretory products of adult Echinococcus granulosus, and their application to co-proantigen detection. Parasitol Int. 2005;54:43–49. [PubMed]
9. Štefanić S, Shaikenov BS, Deplazes P, Dinkel A, Torgerson PR, Mathis A. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of patent infections of Echinococcus granulosus (“sheep strain”) in naturally infected dogs. Parasitol Res. 2004;92:347–351. [PubMed]
10. Dinkel A, Njoroge EM, Zimmermann A, Wälz M, Zeyhle E, Elmahdi IE, Mackenstedt U, Romig T. A PCR system for detection of species and genotypes of the Echinococcus granulosus-complex, with reference to the epidemiological situation in eastern Africa. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34:645–653. [PubMed]
11. Abbasi I, Branzburg A, Campos-Ponce M, Abdel Hafez SK, Raoul F, Craig PS, Hamburger J. Coprodiagnosis of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs by amplification of a newly identified repeated DNA sequence. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;69:324–330. [PubMed]
12. Boufana BS, Campos-Ponce M, Naidich A, Buishi I, Lahmar S, Zeyhle E, Jenkins DJ, Combes B, Wen H, Xiao N, Nakao M, Ito A, Qiu J, Craig PS. Evaluation of three PCR assays for the identification of the sheep strain (genotype 1) of Echinococcus granulosus in canid feces and parasite tissues. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78:777–783. [PubMed]
13. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, Hase T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:E63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Wastling SL, Picozzi K, Kakembo AS, Welburn SC. LAMP for human African trypanosomiasis: a comparative study of detection formats. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:E865. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Iseki H, Kawai S, Takahashi N, Hirai M, Tanabe K, Yokoyama N, Igarashi I. Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method as a tool for diagnosis of infection by the zoonotic simian malaria parasite Plasmodium knowlesi. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:2509–2514. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Muller H, Aysul N, Liu Z, Salih DA, Karagenc T, Beyer D, Kullmann B, Ahmed JS, Seitzer U. Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for rapid diagnosis of Babesia canis infections. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2010;57:63–65. [PubMed]
17. Aonuma H, Yoshimura A, Perera N, Shinzawa N, Bando H, Oshiro S, Nelson B, Fukumoto S, Kanuka H. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification applied to filarial parasites detection in the mosquito vectors: Dirofilaria immitis as a study model. Parasit Vectors. 2009;2:2–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Abbasi I, King CH, Muchiri EM, Hamburger J. Detection of Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium DNA by loop-mediated isothermal amplification: identification of infected snails from early prepatency. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83:427–432. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Mathis A, Deplazes P. Copro-DNA tests for diagnosis of animal taeniid cestodes. Parasitol Int. 2006;55:587–590. [PubMed]
20. Naidich A, McManus DP, Canova SG, Gutierrez AM, Zhang W, Guarnera EA, Rosenzvit MC. Patent and pre-patent detection of Echinococcus granulosus genotypes in the definitive host. Mol Cell Probes. 2006;20:1–10. [PubMed]
21. Geojith G, Dhanasekaran S, Chandran SP, Kenneth J. Efficacy of loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the laboratory identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in a resource limited setting. J Microbiol Methods. 2011;84:71–73. [PubMed]

Articles from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene are provided here courtesy of The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene