PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of elifeeLifeRecent contentAbout eLifeFor authorsSign up for alerts
 
eLife. 2012; 1: e00070.
Published online Dec 13, 2012. doi:  10.7554/eLife.00070
PMCID: PMC3510456
The activity-dependent histone variant H2BE modulates the life span of olfactory neurons
Stephen W Santoro1 and Catherine Dulac1*
1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
Liqun Luo, Reviewing editor
Liqun Luo, Stanford University, United States;
*For correspondence: dulac/at/fas.harvard.edu
Received July 12, 2012; Accepted September 18, 2012.
We have identified a replication-independent histone variant, Hist2h2be (referred to herein as H2be), which is expressed exclusively by olfactory chemosensory neurons. Levels of H2BE are heterogeneous among olfactory neurons, but stereotyped according to the identity of the co-expressed olfactory receptor (OR). Gain- and loss-of-function experiments demonstrate that changes in H2be expression affect olfactory function and OR representation in the adult olfactory epithelium. We show that H2BE expression is reduced by sensory activity and that it promotes neuronal cell death, such that inactive olfactory neurons display higher levels of the variant and shorter life spans. Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of H2BE differ from those of the canonical H2B, consistent with a role for H2BE in altering transcription. We propose a physiological function for H2be in modulating olfactory neuron population dynamics to adapt the OR repertoire to the environment.
Research organism: Mouse
A hallmark of the nervous systems of all mammals is their capacity to undergo changes in function that are shaped by experience. This phenomenon underlies the ability of our brains to develop properly and to learn, and also enables various sensory systems—including the visual, auditory and olfactory systems—to perform optimally in diverse environments.
In most mammals, a high-functioning olfactory system is essential for carrying out tasks that are crucial for survival, such as finding food, avoiding predators and mating. In general, sensory systems have to decipher only a limited collection of stimuli, but the olfactory system must be able to process information from thousands of distinct odors that are found in a given environment and which may vary dramatically from one environment to the next. Each odor-sensing neuron in the nose of a mammal contains just one kind of odorant receptor protein, although mammalian genomes typically encode 1000 or so different kinds of receptor proteins. This suggests that it might be possible to ‘tune’ the olfactory system to a particular environment by changing the relative numbers of the different types of neurons. Indeed, it is known that the relative abundance of each type of odor-sensing neuron changes with age and experience, and that these changes might be caused by variations in the lifespans of the neurons.
Although our understanding of how these experience-dependent changes are orchestrated at the molecular level is far from complete, it is clear that adjustments in the levels of specific gene products is necessary. But how do experiences alter the levels of gene products to give rise to lasting changes in the brain? One hypothesis is that changes to a structure called chromatin are key to this process: chromatin is an assembly of DNA molecules, which are quite long, and organizing proteins, mostly proteins known as histones, that together form a compact structure that can fit inside the nucleus of a cell.
Santoro and Dulac have now discovered a previously uncharacterized protein called H2BE that is found only in the odor-sensing neurons of mice. H2BE is a variant of a protein called H2B, which is a well-known histone. They found that in odor-sensing neurons, H2BE replaces H2B to an extent that depends on the amount of activity experienced by the neuron: H2BE is nearly undetectable in highly active neurons, but almost completely replaces H2B in neurons that are inactive. Moreover, genetic manipulation showed that the deletion of H2BE significantly extended the lifespan of neurons, whereas elevated levels of H2BE shortened their lifespan. These findings reveal an extraordinary process that involves inactive odor-sensing neurons being depleted relative to active ones over time.
How does H2BE, which differs from H2B by just five amino acids, cause such dramatic changes in neuronal composition? One hint comes from evidence that these amino acids disrupt interactions between chromatin and ‘effector’ proteins, which modulate gene activity. Consistent with this, Santoro and Dulac have found that the replacement of H2B by H2BE strongly alters gene activity, although the precise mechanism by which these alterations regulate neuronal lifespans remains to be determined. Understanding this process in detail, and exploring if similar phenomena are involved in experience-dependent changes elsewhere in the nervous system, are fascinating areas of future research.
Research organism: Mouse
The cellular composition and connectivity of vertebrate sensory systems are shaped by signals from the external environment. These activity-dependent changes occur during critical windows of neuronal development as well as in the adult brain, enabling the animal to best perform in a given environment. Pioneering experiments in the visual system showed that patterns of light stimuli reaching each of the two eyes are essential for the activity-dependent refinement of ocular dominance columns in the visual cortex during perinatal development (Hubel and Wiesel, 1977). Similarly, experience-dependent plasticity has been shown to participate in the functional maturation of other sensory systems, including the auditory, somatosensory, and olfactory systems (Hensch, 2004). In addition to their important role in shaping sensory circuits during development, environmental stimuli can also significantly affect adult brain structures, leading to adaptive as well as maladaptive changes in sensory responses (Buonomano and Merzenich, 1998; Ramachandran and Hirstein, 1998; Moseley and Flor, 2012).
Experience-dependent changes in sensory systems alter the cellular composition of sensory relays, as well as the excitability and synaptic connections of neurons involved in processing sensory information. Although a molecular-level understanding of these changes is far from complete, synaptic refinement and activity-dependent transcriptional changes appear to play prominent roles (Holtmaat and Svoboda, 2009; Dulac, 2010; Riccio, 2010; West and Greenberg, 2011).
To date, activity-dependent structural remodeling of sensory systems has primarily been demonstrated in the central nervous system rather than in peripheral organs. The mouse main olfactory epithelium (MOE) offers a unique opportunity to investigate the range and mechanisms of experience-dependent plasticity within a peripheral sensory tissue, where the primary sensory detection occurs. The MOE detects large arrays of chemical cues through the expression of a large family of olfactory receptor (OR) genes (Buck and Axel, 1991). Individual olfactory neurons express a single OR allele chosen through a largely stochastic process (Chess et al., 1994). The olfactory epithelium of mammals displays continuous neurogenesis throughout adulthood, such that a slow dividing olfactory neural stem cell population continuously replaces mature olfactory neurons that have variable, though finite, life spans (Kondo et al., 2010).
We identified a histone H2B variant, H2be, which is exclusively expressed by olfactory sensory neurons, and we hypothesized may participate in olfactory neuron gene regulation. We show that H2be displays activity-dependent expression, and that it regulates the transcriptional program and life span of olfactory sensory neurons. Our data suggest that H2be participates in a pathway that shapes the cellular and molecular composition of the olfactory epithelium based on signals from the external environment, and thus uncover a novel chromatin-based mechanism for activity-dependent neuronal plasticity.
H2BE is an olfactory-specific, replication-independent histone variant
A molecular and bioinformatics search for genes expressed differentially in neuronal subpopulations of the mouse MOE and VNO led to the identification of an uncharacterized H2B histone variant (symbol: Hist2h2be; named for its position (e) among H2B-encoding genes within mouse histone cluster 2 (Marzluff et al., 2002) and referred to herein as H2be). Microarray and in situ hybridization (ISH) analyses revealed high expression of H2be in the MOE and apical VNO neuroepithelium (Figure 1A,B), but no expression in the olfactory bulb (OB) or brain. The Genepaint and Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation (GNF) GeneAtlas (Su et al., 2004) databases, which contain transcriptional information for embryo sections (Figure 1C) and 61 mouse tissues (Figure 1D), respectively, confirmed the remarkable specificity of H2be expression in the MOE and VNO.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mouse H2BE is detected exclusively in chemosensory neurons. (A) Analysis of H2be mRNA in the MOE of an 8-week old mouse, showing expression limited to sensory neurons. Boxed region is magnified (right). (B) Analysis of H2be mRNA in the VNO of an 8-week (more ...)
The H2be mRNA possesses a long 3′-untranslated region (UTR) and a poly-A tail. This contrasts with typical histone transcripts that lack poly-A tails but contain short 3′-stem loop UTRs, which facilitate coordination of histone expression with the cell cycle. These features, together with the observed presence of its mRNA in post-mitotic neurons, suggest that H2be encodes a replication-independent replacement histone. H2BE displays only five amino-acid differences with the canonical mouse H2B protein (Figure 1E). Potential human (Collart et al., 1992), rat, and bovine orthologs to H2be exist, although their expression is uncharacterized.
To facilitate the characterization and unambiguous identification of H2BE from canonical H2B, we fused a FLAG tag to the N-terminus of H2BE, an approach used successfully for several other H2B proteins (Kao and Osley, 2003), and constructed a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenic mouse line expressing the tagged protein (Figure 2A). Control experiments confirmed insertion of the transgene into the genome as a single copy and recapitulation of endogenous H2be expression (Figure 2B–E). We refer to the H2be:Flag-H2be mouse line as Flag-H2be.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Generation of an H2be:Flag-H2be transgenic mouse (referred to as Flag-H2be) reveals that H2BE levels are stereotyped according to OR identity. (A) Flag-H2be transgenic construct, generated through modification of a BAC containing the H2be genomic region (more ...)
H2be expression levels are variable and stereotyped according to the co-expressed OR
Due to the abundance of available molecular and genetic tools, we focused our study on the prospective role of H2be in the MOE. Initial expression analyses revealed that H2be mRNA and protein levels are not uniform among olfactory neurons. Rather, neurons with variable expression levels appear intermingled, and apically-located neurons generally display the highest levels of expression (Figures 1A and 2B). The heterogeneous expression of H2be among MOE neurons could potentially reflect differences in the identity of the co-expressed OR, in neuronal maturity, or in some unknown biological feature. To examine the relationship between H2be and OR expression, we used fluorescent ISH (FISH) to identify mature neurons expressing each of 42 specific OR genes. We then used quantitative fluorescence microscopy (Waters, 2009) (see ‘Materials and methods’) to assess the level of FLAG-H2BE within nuclei of the identified neurons relative to their surrounding neuronal field, imaged in tissue sections spanning the length of the MOE, and across multiple animals (n ≥ 2 per OR). Strikingly, each OR tested appears consistently and reproducibly associated with a stereotyped level of H2BE in mature neurons (Figure 2F,G). Indeed, for 73% of the tested ORs, neurons expressing the same OR display significantly less variation with each other in their H2BE level than is observed within the entire MOE neuronal population (p<0.05 after false-discovery rate [FDR] correction; 1-tailed F-test). These results indicate that H2BE expression in a given neuron is tightly correlated with the identity of the co-expressed OR, and not with a specific stage of neuronal development or maturity.
Loss of H2be alters olfactory function and gene expression
To further investigate the function of H2be, we generated an H2be-null line by targeted replacement of the H2be coding sequence with a membrane-localized mCherry reporter (Gap43-mCherry; Figure 3A). We refer to this line as H2be-KO. Analysis of GAP43-mCherry fluorescence in the MOE of H2be-KO mice revealed a variable intensity of the fluorescent reporter similar to that observed for the endogenous gene (Figure 3B). Analysis of GAP43-mCherry in the olfactory bulb revealed fluorescence limited to sensory axon termini in the glomerular layer. Fluorescence intensities appeared to vary widely among glomeruli, which are each innervated by neurons expressing a given OR, a result consistent with our observations of variable but stereotyped H2BE levels in neurons expressing specific ORs (Figure 3C).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Generation of an H2be-KO/GAP43-mCherry-KI mouse line (referred to as H2be-KO) reveals that loss of H2be causes defects in olfaction. (A) H2be-KO allele, constructed through replacement of the endogenous H2be CDS with a membrane-targeted mCherry-encoding (more ...)
H2be-KO mice appear healthy and fertile. Training of H2be-KO mice and littermate controls to discriminate between odors for a water reward revealed that H2be-KO mice learn the task more slowly and perform less efficiently than the controls, suggesting a defect in olfactory function (Figure 3D). To investigate a potential defect in olfactory signal transduction, we performed electro-olfactograms on MOEs from H2be-KO and heterozygous littermates (Figure 3E) but found no obvious anomalies, indicating that the observed phenotype is not due to gross defects in odor-evoked signaling.
Because histones are central components of chromatin, we suspected that loss of H2be might affect olfactory gene expression. Microarray analysis of whole MOE tissue in 6-month old H2be-KO and WT mice revealed that approximately 6% of transcripts are differentially expressed (p<0.05; Supplementary file 1A; Figure 4—source data 1), a value that may underestimate the effects of H2be loss in the fraction of MOE cells that express H2be. Qualitatively, the effects of H2be loss appear to depend on the normal expression level of a given gene: highly transcribed genes tend to be up-regulated, while moderately transcribed genes appear up- or down-regulated in H2be-KO mice (not shown). Although the differentially-expressed genes do not pass the p<0.05 threshold after FDR adjustment for the 28,064 probe sets tested, likely due to their moderate fold changes, they do show statistically significant enrichment in several gene ontology categories (FDR-adjusted p<0.05; Figure 4A). The categories enriched most strongly among up-regulated genes include ‘olfactory detection’ (consisting of OR genes) and ‘RNA processing’, and among down-regulated genes include ‘developmental process’ and ‘positive regulation of transcription’.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Loss of H2be causes defects in gene expression and OR expression frequencies. (A) Enriched gene ontology categories among genes up- (top) or down-regulated (bottom) in 6-month old H2be-KO vs WT MOEs, based on microarray analyses of whole MOE tissue ( (more ...)
The highly significant enrichment of the ‘olfactory detection’ gene category (FDR-adjusted p=2 × 10−17) reveals that a large number of ORs may be up-regulated in the olfactory epithelia of H2be-KO mice, which we indeed confirmed by quantitative PCR on a subset of genes (Figure 4B). Interestingly, a comparison of gene expression at 6 months with an earlier age of 5 weeks revealed that OR expression differences between WT and H2be-KO mice increase dramatically with age (Figure 4C), and display a significant bias towards up-regulation in the KO (p<10−30, 1-tailed paired t-test). To determine if defects in OR mRNA levels originate from differences in the frequency of OR expression in the MOE, in the cellular level of OR transcripts in individual neurons, or in both, we analyzed the expression of specific ORs by RNA FISH. For each of four ORs quantified, expression differences in H2be-KO and WT mice strongly correlate with differences in OR frequencies (Figure 4D,E) and not cellular levels (not shown). Remarkably, expression differences observed for various ORs in H2be-KO and WT mice were also found to correlate with the level of H2BE with which they are normally co-expressed: ORs with increased expression in H2be-KO mice are associated with high levels of H2BE, while ORs with decreased or unchanged expression appear associated with low H2BE levels (Figure 4F).
Ectopic over-expression of H2be alters OR expression frequencies
Changes in the representation of neurons expressing specific ORs upon loss of H2be led us to predict that ectopic over-expression of H2be might also affect OR frequencies. We generated an Omp:Flag-H2be transgenic mouse line (referred to as H2be-GF) in which Flag-H2be is expressed under the control of the promoter for olfactory marker protein (Omp; Figure 5A), a gene highly expressed in mature olfactory neurons (Danciger et al., 1989). An H2be-GF founder line was identified by quantitative PCR as expressing the transgene at a approximately 10-fold higher level than the endogenous H2be gene (not shown). This line displayed a high level of FLAG-H2BE in all mature olfactory neurons except for a subset in zone 2 (Figure 5B). We reasoned that this serendipitous mosaic expression provided an internal control for the effects of H2be over-expression. Comparison of overall gene expression in MOE tissue from H2be-GF and WT mice revealed widespread differences (Supplementary file 1B; Figure 5—source data 1). Strikingly, both up- and down-regulated genes are dominated by ORs, exhibiting FDR-adjusted p-values of 7 × 10−29 and 3 × 10−18, respectively, for enrichment in the ‘olfactory detection’ category (Figure 5C). Using an FDR-adjusted p-value cutoff of 0.05, we found that approximately 7% of ORs display significant expression differences in H2be-GF mice (Figure 5D). As observed for H2be-KO mice, OR expression changes in H2be-GF mice are strongly correlated with H2BE expression (Figure 5E,F,H) and reflect changes in OR expression frequency, such that ORs that are consistently co-expressed with the transgene are reduced in frequency, while ORs that escape co-expression with the transgene within zone 2 are increased (Figure 5F–I).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Generation of an Omp:Flag-H2be transgenic mouse (referred to as H2be-GF) reveals that ectopic overexpression of H2be in olfactory neurons alters gene expression and OR expression frequencies. (A) H2be-GF transgenic construct, generated through replacement (more ...)
H2BE does not alter OR gene choice, but affects neuronal longevity
Altered OR expression frequencies in H2be-KO and H2be-GF mice could result from changes in OR gene choice or in the life span of neurons expressing a given receptor. To investigate the temporal onset of H2BE expression relative to OR gene choice, we took advantage of the basal to apical gradient of neuronal development in the MOE. Analysis of the onset of H2BE relative to ORs normally associated with high levels of H2BE revealed that H2BE expression is initiated well after OR expression (Figure 6A). We next compared the onset of H2be expression to that of Neurod1, Gap43, and Omp, which are expressed prior to, concurrently with, and subsequent to OR gene choice, respectively (Cau et al., 2002; Iwema and Schwob, 2003; Kolterud et al., 2004). We found that the onset of H2be expression follows the window of Neurod1 expression, as observed at both the protein and RNA levels in MOE tissue from Flag-H2be and WT mice, respectively (Figure 6B,C). Moreover, H2BE expression begins after GAP43 (Figure 6D) and before OMP (Figure 6E), but overlaps extensively with both. Together, these results confirm that H2BE is present prior to full neuronal maturity, but subsequent to OR choice. Thus H2BE is unlikely to participate in the process of OR choice.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
The expression onset of H2be follows OR choice during neuronal development. (A) H2BE is undetectable in an Olfr827+ neuron that is newly-differentiated (note its basal position in the epithelium; boxed and magnified, right), but expressed at uniformly (more ...)
Next, we further analyzed H2be-KO mice for evidence of defects in choice, or in stabilization of OR gene choice. We found no defects in OR co-expression frequencies (Figure 7A) or in the position or number of glomeruli (Figure 7B) in H2be-KO mice, which are phenotypes expected to be associated with the aberrant expression of multiple OR genes or the abnormal switching between distinct ORs (Shykind et al., 2004), suggesting that H2BE is not likely involved in the maintenance of OR gene choice. Finally, as described previously, gene expression analyses indicate that OR expression defects in H2be-KO mice are markedly more severe at 6 months of age than at 5 weeks (Figure 4C). Since disruption in OR gene choice would be expected to cause defects in OR expression that are independent of age, the delayed appearance of OR expression defects in H2be-KO mice is inconsistent with a role for H2BE in this process.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
H2BE affects olfactory neuronal longevity, not OR choice. (A) Representative images (left) and quantification (right) of Olfr1507 and Olfr727 co-expression frequencies in H2be-KO and control littermates (n = 10 sections). (B) Labeled axons of Olfr17-expressing (more ...)
We next investigated the alternative hypothesis that altered OR frequencies in H2be-KO and H2be-GF mice may result from changes in neuronal longevity. Analysis of active-CASP3-labeled mature olfactory neurons in H2be-KO and littermate controls revealed a 45% lower frequency of apoptosis in the mutant epithelium (Figure 7C). Moreover, analysis of the life span of 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU)-labeled neurons revealed a significantly higher survival rate in H2be-KO mice compared to controls (Figure 7D). These results indicate that the loss of H2be increases the life span of mature neurons. Accordingly, similar analyses in H2be-GF mice revealed a twofold higher rate of apoptosis among mature neurons (Figure 7E) and a significantly reduced survival rate compared to Flag-H2be mice (Figure 7F). Remarkably, the initial BrdU labeling frequency of H2be-GF neurons is approximately 2.9-fold higher than that observed in control neurons, reflecting an elevated rate of neurogenesis, presumably a consequence of the increased rate of apoptosis (Figure 7G). To ensure that the observed increase in apoptosis in transgenic epithelia is not due to a non-specific toxic effect of the overexpressed histone, we expressed H2be or Flag-H2be at high levels in cultured fibroblast (NIH-3T3) or embryonic kidney (HEK-293T) cells. Transgene-expressing cells showed no increase in cell death compared to control cells overexpressing the canonical H2b or containing no transgene (not shown), suggesting that H2BE's action in affecting cellular longevity requires an olfactory-specific cellular context. Taken together, these data indicate that the expression of H2be in mature olfactory neurons directly affects neuronal longevity, such that neurons with low expression of H2BE tend to have longer life spans, while neurons with elevated H2BE tend to be relatively short-lived.
H2BE levels are regulated by neuronal activity
We next sought to identify the source of heterogeneity in H2BE level among neurons expressing different ORs in WT mice. To investigate a possible link with neuronal activity, we performed unilateral naris occlusion (UNO) by surgically blocking airflow into one nostril of Flag-H2be mice for 10 days. Upon analysis of H2BE in the MOE of these mice, we observed dramatically higher H2BE expression on the closed side of the epithelium relative to the open side. This increase can be observed at the cellular level in neurons expressing a specific OR (Figure 8A,B), and in the GAP43-mCherry fluorescence within the ipsilateral and contralateral olfactory bulbs of H2be-KO(+/−) mice (Figure 8C). Together, these results indicate that olfactory deprivation causes an up-regulation of H2BE.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
H2be is regulated by activity. (A,B) Effects of unilateral naris occlusion (UNO) on H2BE level in the MOE. (A) Representative images of FLAG-H2BE and Olfr733 colocalization (boxed regions magnified, right; Olfr733+ neurons, arrowheads). (B) Distributions (more ...)
To test whether neuronal stimulation results in reduced H2BE levels, we exposed mice to a mixture of odorants or, as a negative control, to mineral oil. The odorant mixture consisted of four ligands corresponding to known ORs: heptanal/octanal for Olfr2 (Bozza et al., 2002), lyral for Olfr16 (Touhara et al., 1999), and eugenol for Olfr73 (Oka et al., 2004) and Olfr958 (Oka et al., 2006). After 3 weeks of exposure to the odor mixture or mineral oil, the four stimulated neuronal subtypes showed significantly reduced levels of H2BE compared to the same subtypes in control mice (Figure 8D–F; Figure 8—figure supplement 1). In contrast, neurons expressing two randomly picked orphan ORs, Olfr167 and Olfr653, showed no statistically significant differences between odor-exposed and control mice. Thus, olfactory stimulation of specific neurons results in a relative reduction in their nuclear H2BE levels.
To further corroborate the activity-dependence of H2BE, we used GAP43-mCherry fluorescence as a reporter of H2be gene expression in H2be-KO(+/−) mice and measured its intensity relative to that of tyrosine hydroxylase, a marker of neuronal activity in the glomerular layer of the olfactory bulb (Cho et al., 1996). These analyses revealed a significant negative correlation between the two markers, further supporting the view that H2be gene expression is inversely related to neuronal activity (Figure 8G,H).
To investigate the possibility that H2BE expression is regulated by cAMP or Ca2+, two important signaling components and modulators of gene expression in the MOE (Mori and Sakano, 2011), we looked for evidence of changes in H2BE levels in Adcy3-null and Cnga2-null mice, respectively. We found that olfactory neurons that contain undetectable levels of H2BE in WT mice frequently show extremely high levels in their Adcy3(−/−) counterparts (Figure 9A). However, using GAP43-mCherry as a reporter of H2be expression in Cnga2(+/−) mosaic females, we observed no elevation in GAP43-mCherry fluorescence in Cnga2 glomeruli relative to Cnga2+ glomeruli (Figure 9B). These results suggest that the activity-dependent down-regulation of H2BE is cAMP- but not Ca2+-mediated. The precise mechanism of H2BE regulation by cAMP is unclear. One possibility is that H2be expression is suppressed by a factor such as ICER, a cAMP-dependent repressor form of the cyclic-AMP responsive element binding protein (CREB) family member CREM (Lyons and West, 2011). Interestingly, we identified two CRE half-sites within the H2be coding region, although their function, if any, is unknown.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
H2BE levels are cAMP-, but not Ca2+-dependent. (A) Representative example of the effects of Adcy3 loss-of-function on H2BE levels in newborn (P0) mice. In Adcy3(+/+) mice, Olfr1508+ neurons contain extremely low H2BE levels (left, arrowheads), while in (more ...)
H2be mediates activity-dependent changes in olfactory neurons
To investigate a potential role for H2be in mediating activity-dependent changes in gene expression, we performed UNO on H2be-KO and WT mice and compared gene expression differences for each genotype on the open and closed sides of the MOE after 3 weeks of nostril closure. Consistent with a recent study (Coppola and Waggener, 2011), we identified widespread differences in gene expression after activity deprivation in WT mice, with ‘olfactory detection’ (ORs) identified as the most highly enriched gene ontology category among both up- and down-regulated genes (Figure 10A; Figure 10—source data 1). Using an FDR-adjusted p-value cutoff of 0.05, approximately 11.5% of ORs display significant expression differences after olfactory deprivation in WT mice (Figure 10B). FISH analyses revealed that these differences reflect altered OR expression frequencies within the MOE (Figure 10C,D).
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
Unilateral naris occlusion (UNO) alters gene expression and OR expression frequencies. (A) Gene ontology (biological process) terms enriched at the top of a gene list ranked descendingly according to differential expression on the two MOE halves from (more ...)
We then investigated a possible relationship between H2BE levels and changes in OR expression after UNO in WT mice. Remarkably, this analysis revealed that ORs that are down-regulated following UNO are normally co-expressed with high levels of H2BE, while up-regulated ORs are normally co-expressed with low H2BE levels (Figure 10E,F). Thus, if H2BE level is taken as a measure of neuronal inactivity, these data suggest that olfactory deprivation causes normally inactive neurons to decrease in relative abundance, while leading to a relative increase in neurons that are highly active.
Comparison of MOE expression data obtained for WT and H2be-KO mice revealed that for a subset of UNO-altered genes (Figure 11A; Figure 10—source data 1), including a large fraction of ORs (Figure 11B,C), UNO-mediated changes are significantly attenuated in the MOE of the KO compared to the WT. These results suggest that H2BE participates in activity-dependent modulation of olfactory gene expression, though it is clearly not the only mediator of the observed changes.
Figure 11.
Figure 11.
H2be affects activity-dependent gene expression. (A) Gene ontology (biological process) terms enriched among genes with UNO-mediated expression differences in WT mice (log2 fold-change > 0.3; unadjusted p<0.02), but at least 20% less altered (more ...)
Our findings support a model in which the level of olfactory activity of a neuron determines its level of H2BE, which in turn affects its life span (Figure 12). According to this model, inactive neurons express high levels of H2BE, which leads to reduced longevity, while active neurons maintain low levels of H2BE and are relatively long-lived. This model predicts that OR expression frequencies should change with age and experience and lead to the gradual enrichment of active olfactory neurons at the expense of inactive neurons in the MOE. Consistent with this prediction and previous reports of age-dependent changes in OR expression (Lee et al., 2009; Rimbault et al., 2009; Rodriguez-Gil et al., 2010), we found that 65% of all ORs are significantly altered in their expression from 5 weeks to 6 months of age in WT mice (FDR-adjusted p<0.05; not shown). Future experiments will determine the physiological significance of the ORs displaying age-dependent altered expression.
Figure 12.
Figure 12.
Model for the effects of neuronal activity on H2BE expression level, life span and resulting neuronal representation.
H2BE is widely distributed on genomic DNA
To further investigate H2BE's function at the molecular level, we first sought confirmation that transgenic FLAG-H2BE protein, a tool critical for these studies, is normally integrated into chromatin. Fractionation of unfixed MOE cell nuclei from Flag-H2be and H2be-GF transgenic mice showed that FLAG-H2BE is present at barely detectable levels in soluble nucleoplasm and is instead almost entirely chromatin-bound (Figure 13A). Moreover, mass spectrometric analysis of proteins associated with FLAG-H2BE mononucleosomes from Flag-H2be MOE tissue identified numerous chromatin-associated proteins, including several canonical and variant histones (Figure 13B). Finally, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using anti-FLAG antibodies yielded large quantities of DNA from Flag-H2be MOE tissue (Figure 13C). Together, these results provide strong evidence that FLAG-H2BE is readily integrated into the chromatin of olfactory neurons and support the use of Flag-H2be and H2be-GF mice for investigating the molecular function of H2BE.
Figure 13.
Figure 13.
Chromatin incorporation and localization of FLAG-H2BE. (A) Two-color western analysis of FLAG-H2BE and H3 in soluble nucleoplasm (sol) and chromatin (chr) fractions of unfixed MOE cell nuclei from 16-week old Flag-H2be, H2be-GF, and WT mice. (B) SDS-PAGE (more ...)
Using FLAG-H2BE as a molecular surrogate for H2BE, we examined the histone variant's localization on genomic DNA. High-resolution confocal imaging of neuronal nuclei in the MOE of Flag-H2be mice revealed that H2BE is not confined to nuclear puncta, but rather is widely distributed throughout the nucleus (Figure 13D). Analysis of H2BE localization by genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) in MOE neurons confirmed its wide distribution and revealed a slight enrichment near gene promoters, especially in genes highly expressed in mature olfactory neurons (Figure 13E). Interestingly, these analyses and subsequent qPCR experiments revealed that the protein-coding regions of histone genes are particularly enriched for H2BE, while those of OR and vomeronasal receptor (VR) genes are relatively devoid of the variant (Figure 13F–H). Because the ChIP input was obtained from a heterogeneous mixture of MOE nuclei and approximately 99.9% of OR alleles and all VR alleles are silent in a given olfactory neuron, the latter results may reflect the lower accessibility of silent OR and VR loci for replacement of canonical H2B by H2BE, perhaps due to the highly compacted nature of these loci (Magklara et al., 2011). Together, our results support a model in which H2BE replacement of canonical H2B within olfactory chromatin is widespread, but most extensive within transcriptionally active loci.
H2BE and canonical H2B display different post-translational modifications
Four of the five amino acid variant positions within H2BE are located near post-translational modification (PTM) sites of canonical H2B (Figure 1E), raising the question of whether PTMs may differ between the two proteins. We analyzed three relatively well-characterized H2B PTMs: mono-methylation and acetylation of lysine 5 (Lys5-Me and Lys5-Ac), which lies close to the H2BE variant residue P3L, and ubiquitination of lysine 120 (Lys120-Ub), near the variant residue S124A. Both H2B-Lys5 PTMs have been shown to be positively correlated with transcriptional activity, with Lys5-Me and Lys5-Ac enriched within transcribed and promoter regions, respectively (Barski et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2008). H2B-Lys120 ubiquitination, which has also been linked with transcription, appears to play a complex regulatory role (Chandrasekharan et al., 2010).
Analysis of H2BE and H2B-Lys5-Me levels in Flag-H2be MOEs revealed a striking inverse correlation between the two staining patterns, such that neurons expressing a high level of H2BE display conspicuously low H2B-Lys5-Me immunoreactivity, and vice versa (Figure 14A,B). Using an ELISA assay, we ruled out the possibility that the polyclonal antibody against H2B-Lys5-Me is incompatible with the H2BE sequence (Figure 14C). To determine if there is a causal link between the seemingly mutually exclusive expression of H2BE and H2B-Lys5-Me, we examined the prevalence of H2B-Lys5-Me in H2be-KO and H2be-GF mice. Remarkably, loss of H2be leads to widespread H2B-Lys5-Me immunoreactivity in H2be-KO MOEs (Figure 14D), while over-expression of H2BE further reduces H2B-Lys5-Me staining in H2BE-positive nuclei (Figure 14E). Western analysis of MOE lysates from Flag-H2be mice provided a biochemical confirmation that the Lys5-Me modification is absent from the tagged H2BE (Figure 14F). Together, our results suggest that, unlike canonical H2B, H2BE does not undergo detectable mono-methylation at Lys5 and that, consequently, replacement of H2B by H2BE causes a direct reduction of the Lys5-Me modification in H2BE expressing cells. Interestingly, we observe an increase in the number of H2BE expressing neurons, and in H2BE level in individual cells in the MOEs of older animals (Figure 14G–I). This is supported by western analysis, which revealed that the overall level of H2BE in the MOE doubles from 7 weeks to 45 weeks (approximately 10 months) of age (Figure 14J). In addition, we observe that the mutual exclusion between H2BE and H2B-Lys5-Me dramatically increases with age (Figure 14G–I), indicating the gradual replacement of canonical H2B by H2BE, which proceeds to near-completion in a fraction of neurons by 36 weeks (approximately 8.5 months) of age. Further, it suggests that the accumulation of H2BE through replacement of canonical H2B proceeds at a faster pace than it's loss through neuronal turnover.
Figure 14.
Figure 14.
H2BE's post-translational modifications (PTMs) differ from those of canonical H2B. (A,B,D,E) Representative images of H2B-Lys5-Me (A, B, D, and E) and FLAG-H2BE (A, B, and E) staining in the MOE of Flag-H2be (A and B), H2be-KO (D) or H2be-GF (E) mice. (more ...)
Further analyses revealed that the presence of H2BE causes a similar reduction in the level of acetylation at Lys5, indicating that the variant also receives less of this modification compared to canonical H2B (not shown). In contrast, H2BE appears to undergo higher levels of ubiquitination at Lys120, though analyses of the modification in H2be-KO and H2be-GF mice indicate that the association is correlative but not causative (not shown).
We have shown here that the activity-dependent replacement of canonical H2B with H2BE, an olfactory-specific histone variant, has a direct impact on the gene expression and life span of olfactory sensory neurons. These findings uncover a novel mechanism by which the sensory experience of a neuron is recorded within its chromatin to affect its transcriptional program and longevity.
The mammalian olfactory epithelium has the unusual property of persistent neuronal self-renewal throughout adult life. Thus, the repertoire of expressed ORs in the MOE is determined by the combined probabilities associated with the choice of a specific OR by olfactory neuron precursors and the subsequent longevity of those neurons. OR gene choice has been shown to obey a largely stochastic process influenced by the genomic context of local enhancers (Mori and Sakano, 2011). In contrast, olfactory life span appears variable and may be influenced by environmental factors such as pathogens and odorant stimulation (Watt et al., 2004; Kondo et al., 2010). Our data uncover a chromatin-based pathway in which the absence of odor-evoked activity of specific MOE neuronal populations leads to increased H2BE expression, and in turn changes in transcription and reduced neuronal life span. In addition to a pro-apoptotic role of high levels of H2BE, we cannot exclude other roles for this olfactory-specific histone variant at low or moderate levels. Indeed our data indicate that neurons that are normally highly active and therefore express low levels of H2BE increase in abundance following olfactory deprivation, an effect that is diminished in H2be-KO mice. This result may be due to a compensatory increase of the low-H2BE expressing cells following olfactory deprivation, but could also indicate that a modest level of H2BE is optimal for neuronal longevity. In addition, our findings that changes in transcription and OR frequency following unilateral naris occlusion are significantly reduced but not eliminated in H2be-KO mice indicate that H2BE plays a key role in modulating activity dependent changes, but is likely part of a larger pathway.
The transcription factor CREB has been shown to play a major role in orchestrating transcriptional changes associated with activity-dependent neuronal plasticity and survival (Lyons and West, 2011; West and Greenberg, 2011). Interestingly, a previous study showing enhanced longevity of odor-stimulated adenovirus-infected olfactory neurons implicated CREB as the mediator of this effect (Watt et al., 2004). The absence of full CRE sites in the H2be gene does not permit the establishment of a direct functional link between the activity of a CREB family member such as ICER and H2BE levels at this point, but other indirect signaling pathways may exist. An alternative scenario would postulate the existence of a cAMP-regulated chaperone that exchanges canonical H2B and H2BE.
In addition to odor-stimulated neuronal activity, olfactory neurons have been shown to display heterogeneous levels of ligand-independent, OR-derived basal activity that vary according to OR identity and are critical for regulating cAMP signals involved in axon guidance (Imai et al., 2006; Mori and Sakano, 2011). Such studies suggest the possibility that ligand-independent, OR-derived basal signaling may also contribute to the overall activity level in mature olfactory neurons, especially under laboratory housing conditions where the odor repertoire is minimal. This scenario would help explain the observation that loss of Adcy3, which eliminates both basal and odor-stimulated activity, appears to affect H2be levels more dramatically than olfactory deprivation through UNO, which is expected to only eliminate odor-evoked activity. Thus, along with odor-evoked activity, OR-derived basal activity may be a significant contributor to the control of H2BE levels and, in turn, of olfactory neuronal longevity.
H2BE joins a list of molecules with known activity-dependent expression in olfactory neurons, many of which have roles in axon guidance and refinement. These include NRP1, KIRREL2, and EPHA5, which are up-regulated, and SEMA3A, KIRREL3, and EFNA5, which are down-regulated by neuronal activity (Imai et al., 2006; Serizawa et al., 2006). Like SEMA3A, H2BE levels are reduced via cAMP-dependent/ Ca2+-independent signaling, but unlike the other known activity dependent molecules, which are generally expressed in either immature or mature neurons, H2BE is expressed in both. The unusual regulation of H2BE expression likely reflects the variant's unique function in olfactory neurons.
How do the five amino acid differences between H2BE and H2B convey such distinct functional attributes? Studies of H3.3, a histone variant that differs with canonical H3 by merely four amino acids and that plays a critical role in embryonic development and gene expression in adulthood, illustrate how small sequence variations in histones can generate distinct functions (Elsaesser et al., 2010). Our analyses of relative PTM levels for H2BE and canonical H2B at a handful of known PTM sites suggest that incorporation of the variant could affect cellular transcription at least in part via differential post-translational modifiability. It must be acknowledged, however, that as is true for most histone PTMs, evidence that the PTMs affected by H2BE replacement play a role in transcription is merely correlative and therefore insufficient to support a strong functional prediction. Nevertheless, our results are consistent with the idea that H2BE shortens neuronal life span via changes in cellular transcription and metabolism, likely over the time course of several days or weeks, although the precise mechanism for this process remains to be determined. Notably, although phosphorylation of H2B Ser14 has been associated with short trigger of apoptosis in mammalian cells (Cheung et al., 2003), we have not found evidence for involvement of H2BE in this pathway (not shown).
The extensive activity-dependent shifts in the OR repertoire that we observe complement previous studies reporting experience-dependent sensitivity enhancements (Hudson, 1999) and changes in the sensory neuron representation within the MOE (Jones et al., 2008). A scenario thus emerges according to which neurons expressing ORs associated with environmentally salient odors are frequently active and may increase in relative abundance over time due to enhanced longevity, while neurons expressing infrequently activated ORs have a shortened life span, mediated in part by H2BE, and become less abundant (Figure 12). Differential longevity among olfactory sensory may provide an effective mechanism by which individuals with similar genomes adapt to diverse olfactory environments, facilitating enhanced sensitivity to odors important for survival. Accordingly, we observed significant impairment of olfactory learning behavior in H2be-KO mice, although it remains to be determined whether these defects are due to aberrant OR expression frequencies resulting from the lack of H2BE expression or, alternatively, to the altered expression of other genes involved in olfactory neuron signaling.
Among the more than 30 histone variants encoded in the mouse genome (Marzluff et al., 2002) only a handful have so far been characterized in terms of expression and function. Known functions of histone variants include the modulation of transcription, DNA repair, meiotic recombination, chromosome segregation, sex chromosome condensation and sperm chromatin packaging (Banaszynski et al., 2010; Talbert and Henikoff, 2010). Further characterization of histone variants in the brain and in developing and self-renewing tissues represents an exciting area of future investigation.
All procedures involving animals were carried out in accordance with NIH standards and approved by the Harvard University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Unless otherwise indicated, values are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean.
Transgenic and gene targeted mice
The Flag-H2be transgenic mouse line (Figure 2A), which expresses FLAG-H2BE under control of the H2be promoter, was generated based on a described protocol (Yang et al., 1997). Briefly, a FLAG-encoding DNA sequence was inserted through homologous-recombination immediately upstream of the H2be CDS within BAC RP23-16G3, which contains a 200-kb region of mouse genomic sequence surrounding the H2be gene. The modified BAC was amplified in E. coli, confirmed by sequencing, and injected (Harvard Genome Modification Facility) into fertilized mouse zygotes. Transgenic founders were crossed to C57Bl/6 mice to establish the Flag-H2be line. Heterozygous Flag-H2be mice contain a single genomic copy of the transgene that is expressed in a pattern and at a level indistinguishable from that of the endogenous gene (see Figure 2B–E).
The H2be-KO mouse line (Figure 3A), in which the endogenous H2be CDS is replaced with a sequence encoding GAP43-mCherry (an N-terminal fusion of the first 20 amino acids of GAP43 to mCherry), was generated through homologous recombination of the endogenous H2be locus in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) using standard methods. Following selection, ESCs were screened for the desired recombination events, confirmed by sequencing, and injected (Harvard Genome Modification Facility) into mouse blastocysts. Founders were crossed to C57Bl/6 mice to establish the H2be-KO line, in which Gap43-mCherry is expressed in a pattern indistinguishable from that of H2be (see Figure 3B).
The H2be-GF transgenic mouse line (Figure 5A), which expresses Flag-H2be under control of the olfactory marker protein (Omp) promoter, was generated by complete replacement of the Omp CDS in plasmid pJOMP (Danciger et al., 1989) with a sequence encoding FLAG-H2BE, followed by pronuclear injection (Harvard Genome Modification Facility) of the linearized construct into fertilized mouse zygotes. Transgenic founders were crossed to C57Bl/6 mice to establish the H2be-GF line. Heterozygous mice contain approximately 12 genomic copies of the transgene, which are expressed in mature olfactory neurons throughout the MOE with the exception of a band of neurons near zone 2 (see Figure 5B), a pattern that was reproducibly observed in all individuals examined (n = 8).
The P2-IRES-Tau-LacZ mouse line (Mombaerts et al., 1996), which was used to identify possible axon guidance defects in H2be-KO mice (Figure 7B), and the Cnga2-null/Tau-LacZ (Zhao and Reed, 2001) and Adcy3-null (Wong et al., 2000) mouse lines, which were used to identify second messengers affecting H2be expression (Figure 9) were described previously.
Primary antibodies used
  • Active-CASP3 (rabbit polyclonal; Promega, Madison, WI, USA; G7481)
  • β-GAL (rabbit polyclonal; MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA; 55976)
  • BrdU (mouse monoclonal Bu20a; Dako North America, Carpinteria, CA, USA; M0744)
  • FLAG (mouse monoclonal M2; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; F1804)
  • FLAG (rabbit polyclonal; Sigma-Aldrich; F7425)
  • GAP43 (rabbit polyclonal; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA; NB300-143A4)
  • H2B (rabbit polyclonal; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA; 07-371)
  • H2B-Lys5-Me (rabbit polyclonal; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; ab12929)
  • H2B-Lys5-Ac (rabbit monoclonal; Abcam; ab40886)
  • H2B-Lys120-Ub (mouse monoclonal NRO3; Medimabs, Montréal, Québec, Canada; MM-0029)
  • Histone H3 (rabbit polyclonal; Abcam; ab1791)
  • NEUROD1 (goat polyclonal; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; sc1084)
  • OMP (goat polyclonal; Wako Chemicals USA, Richmond, VA, USA; 344-10001)
  • Tyrosine hydroxylase (rabbit polyclonal; Millipore; AB152)
Histological procedures
All histological OR gene expression analyses were performed using fluorescent in situ hybridization (ISH). With the exception of H2be mRNA analyses (Figure 1A,B), which were performed using chromogenic ISH, all other histological analyses were performed using immunofluorescence (IF) or immunohistochemistry (IHC; for Active-CASP3, Figure 7C,E). Unless noted, all images are of coronal tissue sections.
Preparation of ISH probes
ISH target sequences were amplified by PCR and inserted into the pCRII-TOPO vector (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). OR antisense probes were designed to span 500–1000 base pairs, to target CDS or UTR gene regions, and to have <70% identity to any other sequence in the mouse genome. Probes were generated from 1 μg of linearized plasmid template using T7 or Sp6 polymerases (Promega) and digoxigenin or fluorescein RNA labeling mixes (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA), treated with DNaseI (Promega) and ethanol precipitation, and dissolved in a 30-μL volume of water.
Chromogenic ISH
Whole tissues were carefully dissected from surrounding bones, frozen immediately in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek USA, Torrance, CA, USA) on dry ice, and stored at −80°C. Tissue blocks were cut into 12-μm thick cryo-sections, placed onto slides, and stored at −80°C. Chromogenic ISH experiments were performed essentially as described (Schaeren-Wiemers and Gerfin-Moser, 1993).
One-color fluorescent ISH
Fluorescent ISH experiments were performed using a modified version of the chromogenic ISH method. Briefly, slide-mounted sections were warmed (37°C, 10 min), equilibrated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2; 5 min, room temperature [RT]), fixed in paraformaldehyde (PFA; 4% in PBS; 10 min, RT), washed in PBS (3 min, RT), permeabilized with Triton-X-100 (0.5% in PBS; 10 min, RT) followed by sodium dodecyl sulfate (1% in PBS; 5 min, RT), washed in PBS (3 × 3 min, RT), incubated in acetylation solution (triethanolamine [0.1 M; pH 7.5], acetic anhydride [0.25%]; 10 min, RT), washed in PBS (3 × 3 min, RT), incubated in hybridization solution (formamide [50%], SSC [2×], Denhardts [5×], yeast tRNA [250 μg/mL], herring sperm DNA [200 μg/mL], EDTA [1 mM], sodium phosphate [0.05 M; pH 7]; 30 min, RT), hybridized with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probe (1:1000 in hybridization solution; 16 hr, 42°C), washed with SSC (2×; 5 min, 42°C), washed with SSC (0.2×; 3 × 30 min, 42°C), incubated in H2O2 (3% in TN [Tris–HCl (0.1 M; pH 7.5), 0.15 M NaCl]; 30 min, RT), washed in TNT (Tween-20 [0.05%] in TN; 3 × 3 min, RT), incubated in TNB (Blocking Reagent [Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA; 0.05% in TN]; 30 min, RT), incubated with anti-digoxigenin-POD antibody (Roche; 1:1000 in TNB; 12 hr, 4°C), and washed in TNT (3 × 20 min, RT). Fluorescent signals were generated using the Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA) Plus Fluorescein Kit (Perkin Elmer) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Slides were mounted using Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) containing DAPI (5 μg/mL).
Two-color fluorescent ISH
Two-color ISH was performed as described for one-color ISH, with the following modifications: Tissue sections were simultaneously hybridized with both digoxigenin- and fluorescein- or dinitrophenyl-labeled antisense RNA probes (1:1000 each in hybridization solution). Following incubation in TNB (30 min, RT), sections were incubated with anti-fluorescein-POD antibody (Roche; 1:1000 in TNB; 12 hr at 4°C) or anti-dinitrophenyl-HRP antibody (Perkin Elmer; 1:350 in TNB; 3 hr at 25°C) and washed in TNT (3 × 20 min, RT). Fluorescent signals corresponding to the fluorescein- or dinitrophenyl-labeled probes were generated using the TSA Plus Fluorescein Kit, after which sections were washed in TNT (2 × 3 min, RT), incubated in H2O2 (3% in TN; 1 hr, RT), washed in TNT (3 × 3 min, RT), incubated with anti-digoxigenin-POD antibody (1:1000 in TNB; 12 hr, 4°C), and washed in TNT (3 × 20 min, RT). Fluorescent signals corresponding to the digoxigenin-labeled probe were generated using the TSA Plus Cyanine5 Kit (Perkin Elmer) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Slides were mounted using Vectashield containing DAPI (5 μg/mL).
Combined ISH and IF
Combined ISH and IF experiments were performed as described for one-color ISH, with the following modifications: Acetylation, which dramatically reduces detection of the FLAG epitope, was omitted. Following incubation in TNB (30 min, RT), sections were incubated with a mixture of anti-digoxigenin-POD and mouse anti-FLAG antibodies (each 1:1000 in TNB; 12 hr, 4°C) and washed in TNT (3 × 20 min; RT). Fluorescent signals corresponding to the digoxigenin-labeled RNA probe were generated using the TSA Plus Fluorescein Kit, after which sections were washed in TNT (2 × 3 min, RT), incubated with anti-mouse-Alexa647 antibody (Invitrogen; 1:1000 in TNB; 12 hr, 4°C), and washed in TNT (3 × 20 min, RT). Slides were mounted using Vectashield containing DAPI (5 μg/mL).
One- or two-color IF
Animals were anesthetized with ketamine and perfused transcardially on ice with ice-cold PBS (25 mL) followed by ice cold PFA (4% in PBS; 25 mL). Whole tissues were carefully dissected from surrounding bones and immersed in ice-cold PFA (4% in PBS; 1 hr [OB] or overnight [MOE]). MOE tissue was decalcified in EDTA (250 mM in PBS, pH 8.5; 2 days, 4°C), and all tissues were cryoprotected in sucrose (10, 20, and 30% in PBS; 2 hr, 2 hr, and overnight, respectively). Tissues were frozen in OCT on dry ice and stored at −80°C. Tissue blocks were cut into 12-μm thick cryo-sections, placed onto slides, and stored at −80°C.
IF experiments were performed as follows: briefly, slide-mounted sections were warmed (37°C, 10 min), equilibrated in PBS (5 min, RT), fixed in PFA (4% in PBS; 10 min, RT), washed in PBS (3 min, RT), permeabilized with Triton X-100 (0.5% in PBS; 10 min, RT) followed by SDS (1% in PBS; 5 min, RT; omitted if preservation of intrinsic mCherry was necessary), washed in TNT (3 × 5 min, RT), blocked in fetal bovine serum (FBS; 10% in TN; 30 min, RT), incubated with primary antibodies (typically diluted 1:500–1:1000 in 10% FBS; 12 hr, 4°C), washed in TNT (3 × 5 min, RT), incubated with secondary antibodies (typically, Alexa488-labeled [or Alexa488- and Alexa647-labeled, for two-color IF]; Invitrogen; 1:1000 in 10% FBS; 12 hr, 4°C), and washed in TNT (3 × 15 min, RT). Slides were mounted using Vectashield containing DAPI (5 μg/mL).
Combined IHC (active-CASP3) and IF (OMP)
Mice were perfused and the MOE tissue processed as described for IF with the following modifications: After fixation in PFA and PBS washes, slide-mounted sections were permeabilized with Triton X-100 (0.5% in PBS; 30 min, RT), washed with PBS (3 × 3 min, RT), incubated in H2O2 (3% in TN buffer; 30 min, RT), washed with TNT (3 × 3 min, RT), blocked in TNB (30 min, RT), incubated with a mixture of anti-active-CASP3 and anti-OMP antibodies (each 1:300 in TNB; 12 hr, 4°C), washed with TNT (3 × 3 min, RT), and incubated with anti-rabbit-HRP (Jackson; 1:500 in TNB) for 12 hr, 4°C. Fluorescent signals corresponding to active-CASP3 were generated using the TSA Plus Fluorescein Kit, after which sections were washed in TNT (3 × 5 min, RT), incubated with anti-goat-Cy5 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA; 1:500 in TNB; 12 hr, 4°C), and washed in TNT (3 × 15 min, RT). Slides were mounted using Vectashield containing DAPI (5 μg/mL).
BrdU staining
Mice were injected intraperitoneally with BrdU (3 × 50 mg/kg in PBS; injections spaced 30 min apart) and sacrificed at the indicated timepoints (Figure 7D,F). The T = 0 timepoint, defined as 15 days post-injection, was chosen to avoid analysis of immature neurons, a large fraction of which are known to die prior to maturity (Kondo et al., 2010).
Mice were perfused and the MOE tissue processed as described for IF with the following modifications: After permeabilization with Triton X-100 and SDS, slide-mounted sections were washed with PBS (3 × 3 min, RT) and water (3 min at RT), incubated in HCl (2 N; 1 hr, 37°C), and washed with TNT (3 × 3 min, RT). Sections were blocked and further processed as described. Primary antibodies were used at concentrations of 1:50 (BrdU) and 1:300 (OMP).
Imaging and quantitative fluorescence microscopy
Images were obtained using LSM710 and AxioImager Z2 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) microscopes. Confocal images (1–5-μm thick optical sections) were used to quantify fluorescence signals, with care taken to ensure that exposures not exceed the instrument's dynamic range. Intensities were quantified using Zen software (Zeiss). For quantification of nuclear fluorescence in the MOE, circular regions encompassing individual nuclei were defined by DAPI fluorescence. Within each quantified image, a region surrounding the neuronal population (excluding immature and sustentacular cells) was defined to allow normalization to average neuronal nuclear fluorescence. For quantification of fluorescence in the OB, circular regions encompassing individual glomeruli were defined based on surrounding periglomerular cells, which were identified by morphology and DAPI fluorescence. p-Values corresponding to relative H2BE expression variances associated with specific ORs were calculated using a one-tailed F-test with FDR correction for multiple comparisons (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995).
Quantification of OR expression, apoptosis, and BrdU frequencies in the MOE
Fluorescent olfactory neuron counts corresponding to MOE tissue from an individual mouse were determined from a series of 10–12 stained coronal sections located approximately 400 μm apart and spanning the anterior–posterior length of the organ. Fluorescent cell counting was performed using Velocity software (Perkin Elmer) or, when necessary due to difficulties in resolving individual olfactory neurons, manually. Epithelial volumes were calculated from areas determined using Velocity software, based on OMP and DAPI signals.
Analysis of the effects of H2be or Flag-H2be expression in cell culture
Coding sequences for H2BE, FLAG-H2BE, and consensus H2B were inserted into the pLNCX2 vector (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA, USA). Retroviruses carrying the resulting clones were generated and used according to the Retroviral Gene Transfer and Expression User Manual (Clontech). NIH-3T3 and HEK-293 cells were transduced by retroviral infection and cell lines stably expressing high levels of each transgene were selected using Geneticin (500 µg/mL; Invitrogen). Expression of transgenes in selected lines was verified by quantitative RT-PCR. Transgenic and non-transgenic cell lines were analyzed for cell viability using a Vi-Cell XR Cell Viability Analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).
Laser-capture micro-dissection and microarray gene expression analyses
For experiments leading to the initial identification of H2be, RNA was obtained by laser-capture micro-dissection (LCM) of apical and basal neurons in the VNO. Briefly, whole VNOs from 8-week old CD1 male mice were carefully dissected from surrounding bones and immediately frozen in OCT. Tissue blocks were cut into 12-μm thick cryo-sections, placed alternately onto Superfrost and Superfrost plus slides (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA). Sections on Superfrost plus slides were stained by ISH for the Gnai2 and Gnao genes, which mark the apical and basal zones, respectively, and used as guides for LCM. Sections on Superfrost slides were stained with toluidine blue and used for LCM of approximately 100 apical and 100 basal neurons per section using a PixCell II LCM system (Arcturus, now Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). Samples were immediately frozen and pooled into groups of 10 (approximately 1000 cells per group), from which the RNA was extracted using the Arcturus Picopure Kit (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). LCM RNA samples were amplified in parallel with whole VNO RNA samples using the Arcturus RiboAmp OA RNA Amplification Kit (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed using Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
For all other data reported in this study, RNA was prepared from whole MOE tissue or, in the case of UNO expression analyses, from MOE halves that had been carefully removed from the medial bone. RNA was isolated using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen) and purified using an RNeasy Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Experiments were performed using 3–6 biological replicates per condition or genotype and MOE tissue from 2–4 individual mice per replicate. Samples were processed and applied to Affymetrix Mouse Gene 1.0 ST Arrays according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Probe cell intensity files (CEL) were analyzed for potential outliers using the Bioconductor software package arrayQualityMetrics (Kauffmann et al., 2009). CEL files were processed with the Affymetrix Expression Console software to generate probe level summarization files (CHP) using the iterative Probe Logarithmic Intensity Error Estimation (IterPLIER) and sketch-quantile normalization algorithms. Statistical analyses of differential expression between groups were carried out using the Bioconductor limma package (Smyth, 2004) implemented through the Bioconductor affylmGUI software (Wettenhall et al., 2006) to generate unadjusted p-values and false discovery rate (FDR) corrections for multiple comparisons. For analyses of gene expression defects in H2be-KO MOE tissue, FDR corrections were made based on all represented genes with log2 expression levels above five. For analyses of OR expression defects in H2be-GF mice and expression differences following UNO, FDR corrections were made based on all represented OR genes with log2 expression levels above seven or five, respectively.
Gene ontology analyses were performed using the GOrilla software (http://cbl-gorilla.cs.technion.ac.il/) (Eden et al., 2007; Eden et al., 2009). All analyses were carried out using the ‘single ranked list of genes’ mode, with the exception of the analysis summarized in Figure 11A, which was performed using the ‘two lists of genes’ mode. Reported gene ontology summaries represent a subset of biological process terms selected based on redundancy using the REViGO software (http://revigo.irb.hr/; Supek et al., 2011). All reported enrichment p-values are FDR-adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995).
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of gene expression
cDNA samples for qPCR analysis were prepared using the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen) starting from whole MOE RNA prepared using Trizol Reagent and purified using an RNeasy Miniprep Kit. Single-plex experiments (Figure 2D) were performed using the QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen) with an MJ Opticon 2 instrument (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Multiplex experiments (Figure 4B) were performed using the QuantiTect Multiplex PCR Kit (Qiagen) with an ABI 7900HT instrument (Applied Biosystems). Primer pairs (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA) and fluorophore/quencher-labeled probes (Eurofins MWG Operon, Huntsville, AL, USA; Integrated DNA Technologies) were designed using the Primer-BLAST tool (NCBI). Primer efficiencies were assessed using standard curves and pairs exhibiting efficiencies of >99% were used for analysis.
Unilateral naris occlusion
14-day old mice were administered Buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg), anesthetized using isoflurane (confirmed through a tail pinch), and subjected immediately to electrocautery for approximately 5 s on the right nostril under a dissecting microscope (with care taken to avoid contact of the electrocautery unit with any non-superficial tissues). Mice were administered additional doses of Buprenorphine 12 and 24 hr after the procedure and examined on a daily basis to ensure complete blockage of the right nostril through scar formation (typically approximately 3–5 days after the procedure) and normal mouse development and activity.
Chronic odor exposure
Odors were presented as mixtures in mineral oil (octanal [0.31%], heptanal [0.068%], eugenol [2.65%]) or propylene glycol (lyral [10%]) continuously for 21 days at concentrations designed to achieve a vapor pressure of approximately 1 Pa per odorant. Odorants were presented in 100-µL volumes of each solution applied to a cotton pad and inserted into a metal mesh tea ball, which was suspended in the middle of the mouse cage by a metal chain. Odorants were exchanged every 24 hr.
Nuclear fractionation, immunoprecipitation of native mononucleosomes, and mass spectrometry
Preparation of soluble nuclear proteins, chromatin, and mononucleosomes from MOE tissue and immunoprecipitation of FLAG-H2BE-containing mononucleosomes were performed as described (Okada and Fukagawa, 2006; Okada et al., 2006), with modifications. Briefly, MOE tissue from four 8-week old Flag-H2be and four 8-week old WT mice were dissected and immediately minced and mechanically homogenized. Nuclei were filtered through a cell strainer, pelleted, washed, and disrupted by sonication. Chromatin was separated from soluble nucleoplasm by centrifugation, washed, and digested with micrococcal nuclease to mononucleosomes. Mononucleosomes were solubilized in 350 mM KCl buffer and affinity-purified using Anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel (Sigma-Aldrich). Proteins were eluted with FLAG peptide (Sigma-Aldrich), TCA-precipitated, run on a 15% SDS-PAGE gel, and separated into the following molecular weight fractions: >100, 35–100, 18–35, and <18 kDa. Gel fractions were submitted for MS/MS analysis and protein identification within the Harvard University Microchemistry and Proteomics Analysis Facility.
Genome-wide location analysis of FLAG-H2BE
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and ligation-mediated PCR amplification of the purified DNA were performed essentially as described (Lee et al., 2006). Input chromatin was prepared from whole MOE tissue dissected from 5-week old male Flag-H2be mice using mouse anti-FLAG and rabbit anti-histone H3 antibodies. Amplified DNA samples from the FLAG and H3 ChIPs were separately fragmented and analyzed in duplicate (2 mice per replicate) using GeneChip Mouse Promoter 1.0R Arrays (Affymetrix), which tile 10 kb of DNA surrounding the transcript start site of approximately 25,500 mouse genes. CEL files were processed using Tiling Analysis Software (Affymetrix) to generate BAR files.
ChIP signals were analyzed at each position in the genome as a ratio of FLAG to H3 and assigned to a specific gene promoter region using Galaxy (http://main.g2.bx.psu.edu/). Transcripts were grouped based on their expression level in OMP+ olfactory neurons, using expression values downloaded from (Sammeta et al., 2007), or based on their gene family. Within each group, signals at each position relative to the transcript or CDS start site were averaged and plotted to obtain signal profiles for each gene group.
Quantitative PCR analyses of relative FLAG-H2BE levels in the protein-coding (CDS) regions of histone and OR genes were performed on ligation-mediated PCR-amplified DNA from FLAG or H3 ChIP samples. Experiments were performed in triplicate for each input (FLAG or H3) and primer pair combination starting from 0.2 ng of input DNA per reaction. Reactions were performed using the QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen) and an MJ Opticon 2 instrument (Bio-Rad). Primer pairs (Integrated DNA Technologies) were designed using the Primer-BLAST tool (NCBI). Primer efficiencies were assessed using standard curves and pairs exhibiting efficiencies of >99% were used for analysis.
One and two-color fluorescent western blot analyses
Protein samples were separated by electrophoresis on a TRIS-glycine-SDS polyacrylamide gel (10–20% gradient; Bio-Rad), and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were washed in TN (5 min, RT), blocked in Blotto (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 5% in TN; 1 hr, RT), incubated with primary antibodies (each diluted 1:2000 in 5% Blotto [in TNT]; 12 hr, 4°C), washed in TNT (3 × 5 min, RT), incubated with a mixture of Alexa488-conjugated anti-rabbit and Alexa647-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Invitrogen; 1:2000 in 5% Blotto [in TNT]; 1–2 hr, RT), and washed in TNT (3 × 10 min, RT). Blots were scanned using a Typhoon Trio Imager and analyzed using ImageQuant software (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
ELISA
Eight-well Streptavidin High Binding Capacity strips (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were washed (Tris [25 mM, pH 7.5], NaCl [150 mM], BSA [1%], and Tween-20 [0.05%]). Custom-synthesized C-terminally-biotinylated peptides (Abgent, San Diego, CA, USA) corresponding to the N-terminal 13 amino acids of H2BE or the mouse consensus H2B and containing a methyl-modified lysine residue at position five were immobilized within the well strips (1 μg per well in block buffer [0.2 µg mouse IgG in wash buffer]; 3 hr, RT), washed, incubated with anti-H2B-Lys5-Me antibody (1:5000–1:5,000,000 in block buffer; 12 hr; 4°C), washed, incubated with anti-rabbit-HRP (1:2000 in block buffer; 1 hr, RT), and washed. ELISA signals were developed using the 1-Step Ultra TMB-ELISA reagent (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Olfactory odor discrimination training
Ten 4-month old H2be-KO and heterozygous littermates were subjected to odor discrimination training using water restriction for motivation, under a behavioral paradigm similar to that described (Uchida and Mainen, 2003), but adapted for mice. In an initial experiment, mice were challenged to discriminate between hexanol and hexanoic acid, and in a second experiment, were challenged with the two stereoisomers of carvone. Prior to the initial experiment, mice were trained to obtain water from two ports unconditionally (day 1), after first poking an odor port (days 2–5), after poking an odor port presenting isoamyl-acetate odor (days 6–13), and after only a single poke of an odor port presenting isoamyl-acetate odor (days 14–20). Odor discrimination training began on day 21. Odors streams, controlled by an olfactometer, were generated from air passed through a filter containing 10% of the concentrated odorant in mineral oil and diluted 1:20 into a stream of clean air.
Acknowledgements
We thank N. Uchida and M. Uchida for assistance with odor-discrimination experiments, J. Bergan for assistance with electro-olfactogram experiments, N. Rubinstein for assistance with statistical analyses, D. Storm for Adcy3-KO mice, and D. Reinberg, N. Francis, and members of the Dulac lab for helpful discussions.
Funding Statement
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Funding Information
This paper was supported by the following grants:
  • National Institutes of Health R21DC011117 to Catherine Dulac.
  • National Institutes of Health R01DC009019 to Catherine Dulac.
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute to Catherine Dulac.
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund 1003528.02 to Stephen W Santoro.
Additional information
Competing interests
CD: Senior Editor, eLife.
The other author has declared that no competing interests exist.
Author contributions
SWS: Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.
CD: Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: This study was performed within the facilities of the Harvard University Faculty of Arts and Sciences (HU/FAS) in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All animals were handled according to a protocol approved by the Harvard University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; protocol #97-03). The HU/FAS animal care and use program maintains full AAALAC accreditation, is assured with OLAW (A3593-01), and is currently registered with the USDA. Every effort was made to minimize animal suffering during this study.
Additional files
10.7554/eLife.00070.021Supplementary file 1.
(A) Effects of H2be loss-of-function on gene expression, based on microarray analyses of whole MOE tissue from 6-month old H2be-KO and WT mice (n = 6 samples per genotype, two animals per sample). Top 100 genes that are up- (left) or down-regulated (right) in H2be-KO mice compared to WT controls are listed according to their unadjusted p-value rank. OR genes are highlighted. (B) Effects of ectopic over-expression of H2be on gene expression, based on microarray analyses of whole MOE tissue from 5-week old H2be-GF (n = 4 samples, three animals per sample) and WT (n = 6 samples, two animals per sample) mice. Top 100 genes that are up- (left) or down- (right) regulated in H2be-GF mice compared to WT controls are listed according to their unadjusted p-value rank. OR genes are highlighted.
Major datasets
The following datasets were generated
Santoro SW, Dulac C, 2012, Effects of H2be loss of function on gene expression in the main olfactory epithelium (MOE) of 6-month old mice, GSE39515; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE39515, In the public domain at GEO http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/
Santoro SW, Dulac C, 2012, Effects of H2be loss of function on gene expression changes in the main olfactory epithelium (MOE) as a result of activity deprivation through unilateral naris occlusion (UNO), GSE39516; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE39516, In the public domain at GEO http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/
Santoro SW, Dulac C, 2012, Effects of H2be ectopic over-expression on gene expression in the main olfactory epithelium (MOE) of 5-week old mice, GSE39514; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE39514, In the public domain at GEO http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/
Santoro SW, Dulac C, 2012, Genome-wide location analysis of FLAG-H2BE, GSE39517; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE39517, In the public domain at GEO http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/
  • Banaszynski LA, Allis CD, Lewis PW. 2010. Histone variants in metazoan development. Dev Cell 19:662–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, Wang Z, et al. 2007. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129:823–37. [PubMed]
  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met 57:289–300.
  • Bozza T, Feinstein P, Zheng C, Mombaerts P. 2002. Odorant receptor expression defines functional units in the mouse olfactory system. J Neurosci 22:3033–43. [PubMed]
  • Buck L, Axel R. 1991. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65:175–87. [PubMed]
  • Buonomano DV, Merzenich MM. 1998. Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu Rev Neurosci 21:149–86. [PubMed]
  • Cau E, Casarosa S, Guillemot F. 2002. Mash1 and Ngn1 control distinct steps of determination and differentiation in the olfactory sensory neuron lineage. Development 129:1871–80. [PubMed]
  • Chandrasekharan MB, Huang F, Sun ZW. 2010. Histone H2B ubiquitination and beyond: Regulation of nucleosome stability, chromatin dynamics and the trans-histone H3 methylation. Epigenetics 5:460–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chess A, Simon I, Cedar H, Axel R. 1994. Allelic inactivation regulates olfactory receptor gene expression. Cell 78:823–34. [PubMed]
  • Cheung WL, Ajiro K, Samejima K, Kloc M, Cheung P, Mizzen CA, et al. 2003. Apoptotic phosphorylation of histone H2B is mediated by mammalian sterile twenty kinase. Cell 113:507–17. [PubMed]
  • Cho JY, Min N, Franzen L, Baker H. 1996. Rapid down-regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase expression in the olfactory bulb of naris-occluded adult rats. J Comp Neurol 369:264–76. [PubMed]
  • Collart D, Romain PL, Huebner K, Pockwinse S, Pilapil S, Cannizzaro LA, et al. 1992. A human histone H2B.1 variant gene, located on chromosome 1, utilizes alternative 3' end processing. J Cell Biochem 50:374–85. [PubMed]
  • Coppola DM, Waggener CT. 2011. The effects of unilateral naris occlusion on gene expression profiles in mouse olfactory mucosa. J Mol Neurosci 47:604–18. [PubMed]
  • Danciger E, Mettling C, Vidal M, Morris R, Margolis F. 1989. Olfactory marker protein gene: its structure and olfactory neuron-specific expression in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:8565–9. [PubMed]
  • Dulac C. 2010. Brain function and chromatin plasticity. Nature 465:728–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Eden E, Lipson D, Yogev S, Yakhini Z. 2007. Discovering motifs in ranked lists of DNA sequences. PLoS Comput Biol 3:e39. [PubMed]
  • Eden E, Navon R, Steinfeld I, Lipson D, Yakhini Z. 2009. GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists. BMC Bioinformatics 10:48. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Elsaesser SJ, Goldberg AD, Allis CD. 2010. New functions for an old variant: no substitute for histone H3.3. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20:110–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hensch TK. 2004. Critical period regulation. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:549–79. [PubMed]
  • Holtmaat A, Svoboda K. 2009. Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:647–58. [PubMed]
  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. 1977. Ferrier lecture. Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 198:1–59. [PubMed]
  • Hudson R. 1999. From molecule to mind: the role of experience in shaping olfactory function. J Comp Physiol A 185:297–304. [PubMed]
  • Imai T, Suzuki M, Sakano H. 2006. Odorant receptor-derived cAMP signals direct axonal targeting. Science 314:657–61. [PubMed]
  • Iwema CL, Schwob JE. 2003. Odorant receptor expression as a function of neuronal maturity in the adult rodent olfactory system. J Comp Neurol 459:209–22. [PubMed]
  • Jones SV, Choi DC, Davis M, Ressler KJ. 2008. Learning-dependent structural plasticity in the adult olfactory pathway. J Neurosci 28:13106–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kao CF, Osley MA. 2003. In vivo assays to study histone ubiquitylation. Methods 31:59–66. [PubMed]
  • Kauffmann A, Gentleman R, Huber W. 2009. arrayQualityMetrics–a bioconductor package for quality assessment of microarray data. Bioinformatics 25:415–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kolterud A, Alenius M, Carlsson L, Bohm S. 2004. The Lim homeobox gene Lhx2 is required for olfactory sensory neuron identity. Development 131:5319–26. [PubMed]
  • Kondo K, Suzukawa K, Sakamoto T, Watanabe K, Kanaya K, Ushio M, et al. 2010. Age-related changes in cell dynamics of the postnatal mouse olfactory neuroepithelium: cell proliferation, neuronal differentiation, and cell death. J Comp Neurol 518:1962–75. [PubMed]
  • Lee AC, Tian H, Grosmaitre X, Ma M. 2009. Expression patterns of odorant receptors and response properties of olfactory sensory neurons in aged mice. Chem Senses 34:695–703. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lee TI, Johnstone SE, Young RA. 2006. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarray-based analysis of protein location. Nat Protoc 1:729–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lyons MR, West AE. 2011. Mechanisms of specificity in neuronal activity-regulated gene transcription. Prog Neurobiol 94:259–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Magklara A, Yen A, Colquitt BM, Clowney EJ, Allen W, Markenscoff-Papadimitriou E, et al. 2011. An epigenetic signature for monoallelic olfactory receptor expression. Cell 145:555–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Marzluff WF, Gongidi P, Woods KR, Jin J, Maltais LJ. 2002. The human and mouse replication-dependent histone genes. Genomics 80:487–98. [PubMed]
  • Mombaerts P, Wang F, Dulac C, Chao SK, Nemes A, Mendelsohn M, et al. 1996. Visualizing an olfactory sensory map. Cell 87:675–86. [PubMed]
  • Mori K, Sakano H. 2011. How is the olfactory map formed and interpreted in the mammalian brain? Annu Rev Neurosci 34:467–99. [PubMed]
  • Moseley GL, Flor H. 2012. Targeting cortical representations in the treatment of chronic pain: a review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26:646–52. [PubMed]
  • Oka Y, Katada S, Omura M, Suwa M, Yoshihara Y, Touhara K. 2006. Odorant receptor map in the mouse olfactory bulb: in vivo sensitivity and specificity of receptor-defined glomeruli. Neuron 52:857–69. [PubMed]
  • Oka Y, Omura M, Kataoka H, Touhara K. 2004. Olfactory receptor antagonism between odorants. EMBO J 23:120–6. [PubMed]
  • Okada M, Cheeseman IM, Hori T, Okawa K, McLeod IX, Yates JR, III, et al. 2006. The CENP-H-I complex is required for the efficient incorporation of newly synthesized CENP-A into centromeres. Nat Cell Biol 8:446–57. [PubMed]
  • Okada M, Fukagawa T. 2006. Purification of a protein complex that associates with chromatin. Protocol Exchange 10.1038/nprot.2006.417.
  • Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W. 1998. The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain 121:1603–30. [PubMed]
  • Riccio A. 2010. Dynamic epigenetic regulation in neurons: enzymes, stimuli and signaling pathways. Nat Neurosci 13:1330–7. [PubMed]
  • Rimbault M, Robin S, Vaysse A, Galibert F. 2009. RNA profiles of rat olfactory epithelia: individual and age related variations. BMC Genomics 10:572. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rodriguez-Gil DJ, Treloar HB, Zhang X, Miller AM, Two A, Iwema C, et al. 2010. Chromosomal location-dependent nonstochastic onset of odor receptor expression. J Neurosci 30:10067–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sammeta N, Yu TT, Bose SC, McClintock TS. 2007. Mouse olfactory sensory neurons express 10,000 genes. J Comp Neurol 502:1138–56. [PubMed]
  • Schaeren-Wiemers N, Gerfin-Moser A. 1993. A single protocol to detect transcripts of various types and expression levels in neural tissue and cultured cells: in situ hybridization using digoxigenin-labelled cRNA probes. Histochemistry 100:431–40. [PubMed]
  • Serizawa S, Miyamichi K, Takeuchi H, Yamagishi Y, Suzuki M, Sakano H. 2006. A neuronal identity code for the odorant receptor-specific and activity-dependent axon sorting. Cell 127:1057–69. [PubMed]
  • Shykind BM, Rohani SC, O'Donnell S, Nemes A, Mendelsohn M, Sun Y, et al. 2004. Gene switching and the stability of odorant receptor gene choice. Cell 117:801–15. [PubMed]
  • Smyth GK. 2004. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3:Article3. [PubMed]
  • Su AI, Wiltshire T, Batalov S, Lapp H, Ching KA, Block D, et al. 2004. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6062–7. [PubMed]
  • Sullivan SL, Adamson MC, Ressler KJ, Kozak CA, Buck LB. 1996. The chromosomal distribution of mouse odorant receptor genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:884–8. [PubMed]
  • Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. 2011. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One 6:e21800. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Talbert PB, Henikoff S. 2010. Histone variants–ancient wrap artists of the epigenome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:264–75. [PubMed]
  • Touhara K, Sengoku S, Inaki K, Tsuboi A, Hirono J, Sato T, et al. 1999. Functional identification and reconstitution of an odorant receptor in single olfactory neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:4040–5. [PubMed]
  • Uchida N, Mainen ZF. 2003. Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat. Nat Neurosci 6:1224–9. [PubMed]
  • Waggener CT, Coppola DM. 2007. Naris occlusion alters the electro-olfactogram: evidence for compensatory plasticity in the olfactory system. Neurosci Lett 427:112–6. [PubMed]
  • Wang Z, Zang C, Rosenfeld JA, Schones DE, Barski A, Cuddapah S, et al. 2008. Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat Genet 40:897–903. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Waters JC. 2009. Accuracy and precision in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. J Cell Biol 185:1135–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Watt WC, Sakano H, Lee ZY, Reusch JE, Trinh K, Storm DR. 2004. Odorant stimulation enhances survival of olfactory sensory neurons via MAPK and CREB. Neuron 41:955–67. [PubMed]
  • West AE, Greenberg ME. 2011. Neuronal activity-regulated gene transcription in synapse development and cognitive function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:a005744. 10.1101/cshperspect.a005744. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wettenhall JM, Simpson KM, Satterley K, Smyth GK. 2006. affylmGUI: a graphical user interface for linear modeling of single channel microarray data. Bioinformatics 22:897–9. [PubMed]
  • Wong ST, Trinh K, Hacker B, Chan GC, Lowe G, Gaggar A, et al. 2000. Disruption of the type III adenylyl cyclase gene leads to peripheral and behavioral anosmia in transgenic mice. Neuron 27:487–97. [PubMed]
  • Yang XW, Model P, Heintz N. 1997. Homologous recombination based modification in Escherichia coli and germline transmission in transgenic mice of a bacterial artificial chromosome. Nat Biotechnol 15:859–65. [PubMed]
  • Zhao H, Reed RR. 2001. X inactivation of the OCNC1 channel gene reveals a role for activity-dependent competition in the olfactory system. Cell 104:651–60. [PubMed]
  • Zheng C, Feinstein P, Bozza T, Rodriguez I, Mombaerts P. 2000. Peripheral olfactory projections are differentially affected in mice deficient in a cyclic nucleotide-gated channel subunit. Neuron 26:81–91. [PubMed]

Decision letter
Liqun Luo, Reviewing editor
Liqun Luo, Stanford University, United States;
 
eLife posts the editorial decision letter and author response on a selection of the published articles (subject to the approval of the authors). An edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the substantive concerns or comments; minor concerns are not usually shown. Reviewers have the opportunity to discuss the decision before the letter is sent (see review process). Similarly, the author response typically shows only responses to the major concerns raised by the reviewers.
Thank you for choosing to send your work entitled “The activity-dependent histone variant H2BE modulates the life span of olfactory neurons” for consideration at eLife. Your article has been evaluated by a Senior Editor and 2 reviewers, one of whom is a member of eLife's Board of Reviewing Editors.
The Reviewing Editor and the other reviewers discussed their comments before we reached this decision, and the Reviewing Editor has assembled the following comments based on the reviewers' reports. Our goal is to provide the essential revision requirements as a single set of instructions, so that you have a clear view of the revisions that are necessary for us to publish your work.
This manuscript describes thorough investigations of the expression and function of a histone H2 variant H2BE, which is specifically expressed in the olfactory and vomeronasal neurons and appears regulated by neuronal activity. H2BE is co-expressed with a subset of odorant receptors (ORs). Genetic loss-of-function and gain-of-function analyses support the model that H2BE regulates the OR expression landscape by affecting the longevity of sensory neurons. These experiments provide compelling evidence for a novel and highly interesting phenomenon and its underlying mechanisms: lack of sensory activity over a period of weeks induces the expression of H2BE, which in turn promotes the elimination of less-used OR populations. This selection allows mice to optimize the OR repertoire for their environment. The findings are also exciting for the chromatin biology field, since only few histone variants have been studied so far in a biologically relevant context.
The topic is of broad interest and the experiments are well documented. Although the key mechanism of regulating neuronal longevity by the broadly distributing H2BE in the nucleus is still unknown, this manuscript provides the basis for future studies of H2BE function. Thus, the paper should be published pending a few key experiments:
1. There is a concern whether the BAC transgenic H2BE faithfully follows the expression of the endogenous H2BE. Recently published microarray analysis of the different developmental stages of the OE shows high levels of H2BE even before the NeuroD positive stage (e.g., Nickell et al: J Comp Neurol. 2012 Aug 15;520(12):2608-29. doi: 10.1002/cne.23052). The authors should show the authenticity of the H2BE transgene expression by crossing the BAC transgenic to the mCherry knock-in allele and compare their expression pattern.
2. A question has been raised whether the Flag-H2BE is nucleosomal. Indeed histones can be incorporated in the nucleosomes in a replication independent manner but we do not know if this happens in post-mitotic olfactory neurons. In the majority of the IFs presented here H2BE forms a distinct ring on the nuclear envelope with little signal on the nucleoplasm. Thus it is possible that the transgenic H2BE is expressed too late, differentiation-wise, and cannot be incorporated in nucleosomes as efficiently as the endogenous histone. The Chip analysis does not really alleviate this concern because it uses crosslinked chromatin. A simple answer to this question would be to generate native mononucleosomes from the olfactory epithelium and show that FLAG-H2BE is incorporated in these nucleosomes, or that it can be co-immunoprecipitated with histones H3 and H4 again from native nucleosomal preparations. The same should be also done with the OMP-driven transgene. Also the authors should provide some information on the relative levels of free vs nucleosomal FLAG-H2BE in each genotype (for example they can perform salt dialysis on OE nuclei – only free histones would be extracted).
3. It is suggested that the authors take out all the information regarding the modification status of this histone variant (since it is not clear what are the effects of Lys-5 methylation in transcription anyways) or the relationship with paused or elongating polII (the images are not very convincing and they do not really provide much insight regarding the role of this histone variant). Since the biology described here is so interesting, it is better to omit preliminary or inconclusive mechanistic data and replace them with the supplemental figures from the olfactory bulb.

 
1. There is a concern whether the BAC transgenic H2BE faithfully follows the expression of the endogenous H2BE. Recently published microarray analysis of the different developmental stages of the OE shows high levels of H2BE even before the NeuroD positive stage (e.g., Nickell et al: J Comp Neurol. 2012 Aug 15;520(12):2608-29. doi: 10.1002/cne.23052). The authors should show the authenticity of the H2BE transgene expression by crossing the BAC transgenic to the mCherry knock-in allele and compare their expression pattern.
Based on a published report suggesting an onset of H2BE expression prior to NeuroD, the reviewers express the important concern that our H2be:Flag-H2be transgene may not fully recapitulate the endogenous H2be expression and that the endogenous gene may be initiated at an earlier developmental stage than described in our manuscript, which would potentially invalidate some of our conclusions. We have addressed this concern in multiple ways by demonstrating that (A) the transgenic and endogenous H2be genes display a similar expression onset and (B) NeuroD-positive progenitors do not yet express the endogenous H2be gene, which emerges at a later stage of olfactory neuronal differentiation. Finally, we offer a slightly different interpretation of the data in Nickell et al, which is fully compatible with our conclusions (C)
A. To directly examine the similarity of expression between the H2be:Flag-H2be transgene and the endogenous H2be gene, we analyzed the colocalization of FLAG-H2BE protein and H2be mRNA using combined IF and ISH. A representative image from this experiment (newly included as Figure 2E) demonstrates a strong agreement between cellular levels of FLAG-H2BE protein and H2be mRNA, despite the different cellular localization of the protein and RNA. The observation of occasional basally-located neurons in which H2be mRNA can be detected but FLAG-H2BE cannot is likely the expected result of a slight lag in protein production following the onset of H2be transcription in immature neurons. These results confirm previous expression data showing highly similar staining patterns for the FLAG-H2BE and endogenous H2be (e.g., Figure 1A and Figure 2B). Together with the RT-qPCR data showing identical RNA expression levels for the transgenic and endogenous alleles (Figure 2D), we believe that these data strongly suggest faithful recapitulation of endogenous H2be gene expression by the H2be:Flag-H2be transgene. Of note, we also performed the experiment suggested by the reviewers (crossing the BAC transgenic to the mCherry knock-in allele and compare their expression pattern), but have not included the data as the presence of membrane-bound mCherry in axons crossing the basal layer of the olfactory epithelium, in addition to the cell bodies, makes it impossible to obtain a clear cellular resolution of H2BE expression onset by immunostaining or intrinsic fluorescence.
B. To further confirm our previous findings of the lack of co-expression of H2be and Neurod1 at the protein level (based on FLAG-H2BE protein expression in Flag-H2be transgenic mice; Figure 6B), we also examined a potential overlap between endogenous H2be and Neurod1 at the mRNA level in wild type mice. A representative image of this experiment (newly included as Figure 6C) clearly demonstrates the complete absence of overlap between the expression patterns of the two mRNAs, strongly supporting our conclusion that the onset of H2be expression strictly follows and does not include the developmental window of Neurod1 expression.
C. We are grateful to the reviewers for drawing our attention to the recently published Nickell et al. paper, which we think is an excellent resource for understanding comprehensive gene expression changes that occur during olfactory development. After carefully reading the Nickell paper, however, we respectfully disagree with the reviewers’ interpretation that H2be is highly expressed prior to the onset of Neurod1. Although the authors of the Nickell paper used a transgenic GFP marker (called TgN1-2G) driven from the Ngn1 promoter, which is active in neural progenitors, they found that the GFP levels are actually highest in immature neurons, not in earlier neural progenitor cells (i.e., when Neurod1 is expressed). As stated by Nickell et al. (page 2612):
“Even if the TgN1-2G transgene is faithful to the expression pattern of the endogenous gene, rapid transition from immediate neuronal precursor basal cells into immature OSNs could result in fluorescent labeling primarily of immature OSNs. Consistent with this expectation, we found that the GFP fluorescence pattern consisted of only a few basal cells but many cells with fluorescent dendrites and axons—cells located at the depth of the immature OSN layer of the olfactory epithelium (Fig. 1C). This GFP fluorescence overlapped well with immunoreactivity for the immature OSN-specific marker Gap43, but not for the mature OSN-specific marker, Omp, confirming that the highly fluorescent cells were nearly all immature OSNs (Fig. 1C).”
Thus, the Nickell paper shows only that H2be is expressed at high levels in immature neurons (i.e., GAP43+), which is consistent with our data, but it gives no insight into its expression in neural progenitors.
2. A question has been raised whether the Flag-H2BE is nucleosomal. Indeed histones can be incorporated in the nucleosomes in a replication independent manner but we do not know if this happens in post-mitotic olfactory neurons. In the majority of the IFs presented here H2BE forms a distinct ring on the nuclear envelope with little signal on the nucleoplasm. Thus it is possible that the transgenic H2BE is expressed too late, differentiation-wise, and cannot be incorporated in nucleosomes as efficiently as the endogenous histone. The Chip analysis does not really alleviate this concern because it uses crosslinked chromatin. A simple answer to this question would be to generate native mononucleosomes from the olfactory epithelium and show that FLAG-H2BE is incorporated in these nucleosomes, or that it can be co-immunoprecipitated with histones H3 and H4 again from native nucleosomal preparations. The same should be also done with the OMP-driven transgene. Also the authors should provide some information on the relative levels of free vs nucleosomal FLAG-H2BE in each genotype (for example they can perform salt dialysis on OE nuclei – only free histones would be extracted).
The reviewers express an important concern about the extent to which the transgenic H2BE is nucleosome-bound versus free in the nucleoplasm. We have addressed this concern in multiple ways, and have confirmed the largely chromatin-bound state of transgenic H2BE:
A. To directly investigate the extent to which FLAG-H2BE is chromatin-bound, we isolated unfixed MOE cell nuclei from Flag-H2be and H2be-GF transgenic mice and then fractionated the nuclei into soluble nucleoplasm and chromatin, based on a protocol published by the Fukagawa lab (Okada and Fukagawa, Protocol Exchange, 2006). We used two-color western analysis to compare the amount of FLAG-H2BE and H3 in the two fractions. An image of the immunoblot (newly included as Figure 13A) shows that FLAG-H2BE and H3 are present at very low levels in soluble nucleoplasm and are almost entirely chromatin bound.
B. To further investigate the association of H2BE with chromatin, we immunoprecipitated native mononucleosomes containing FLAG-H2BE from chromatin of transgenic Flag-H2be mice and analyzed the associated proteins by mass spectrometry and western. This experiment (summarized in the newly included Figure 13B) revealed a large number of chromatin-associated proteins that were immunoprecipitated with H2BE at the nucleosome level, including many other histone proteins. These results provide strong evidence that FLAG-H2BE is integrated into the chromatin of olfactory neurons.
C. In performing our genome-wide location analysis experiments, we measured the amount of DNA immunoprecipitated from chromatin of transgenic Flag-H2be mice using anti-FLAG and anti-H3 antibodies. These measurements (summarized in the newly included Figure 13C) show that both antibodies precipitate large quantities of DNA. These data further confirm that FLAG-H2BE is integrated into the chromatin of olfactory neurons.
D. There are two likely explanations for the appearance of a nuclear ring in some of our IF images: 1) olfactory neurons have a single or small number of large central chromocenters that are not stained with anti-FLAG antibodies, leading to the appearance of stronger staining on the nuclear periphery (for example, see Figure 13D). 2) The anti-FLAG antibody stains chromatin within the nuclear periphery more quickly than the euchromatin within the nuclear interior. This is particularly evident for MOE tissue from H2be-GF mice, where the level of Flag-H2be is much higher than in Flag-H2be mice (for example, Figure 14E). We have observed that more uniform staining throughout the nucleus is achieved with long antibody incubation times, indicating that the apparent peripheral staining is not due to concentration of FLAG-H2BE at the nuclear periphery.
3. It is suggested that the authors take out all the information regarding the modification status of this histone variant (since it is not clear what are the effects of Lys-5 methylation in transcription anyways) or the relationship with paused or elongating polII (the images are not very convincing and they do not really provide much insight regarding the role of this histone variant). Since the biology described here is so interesting, it is better to omit preliminary or inconclusive mechanistic data and replace them with the supplemental figures from the olfactory bulb.
The reviewers suggest that we remove the data related to the differential PTM status of canonical and variant H2B and the data concerning the effects of H2BE on the elongation status of polII as they find them mechanistically uninformative (PTM) or weak (polII). As detailed below we agree with some of this assessment, and propose a compromise in which we keep what we view as the strongest and most important data, while downplaying some of their mechanistic implications in the text of the manuscript.
A. With respect to the findings that H2BE receives dramatically reduced monomethylation at Lys5 compared to canonical H2B, we agree with the reviewers that the biological implication is presently unknown. Although this modification has been strongly correlated with active transcription in other cell systems (Barski et al. 2007, Cell 129, 823-837; Wang et al. 2008, Nature Genetics 40, 897-903), a causative association has not been established. Moreover, since we did not survey all possible H2B modifications, our understanding of H2BE’s modification status is by no means complete. However, we are reluctant to entirely omit these data, as we believe that the finding represents an important proof of concept for potential functional differences between the two histones at the molecular level, which must be mediated by only five amino acid differences. We believe that the finding of reduced Lys5-Me modification serves as a platform for further investigations into the functional differences between the two molecules and possibly for understanding the biological function of the H2B-Lys5-Me modification. Thus, we wish to keep these data in the manuscript, but we have modified the text to emphasize that the finding is not an indication of mechanism.
B. With respect to our findings that H2BE causes reduced RNAPII elongation and increased pausing, we believe that the data presented are solid and significant, but we agree with the reviewer that they are less convincing, and that they be corroborated using other methods. Thus, we have removed this set of results entirely. Please note: we have eliminated or moved supplemental data to main figures, and in particular the images of the olfactory bulb to which the reviewers referred.
Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd