Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Am J Ophthalmol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 November 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3509500

Histological Development of the Human Fovea From Midgestation to Maturity

Anita Hendrickson, Ph.D.,1,2 Daniel Possin, B.S.,1 Lejla Vajzovic, M.D,3 and Cynthia Toth, M.D.3,4



To describe the histological development of the human central retina from fetal week (Fwk) 22 to 13 years.


Retrospective observational case series


Retinal layers and neuronal substructures were delineated on foveal sections of fixed tissue stained in azure II-methylene blue and on frozen sections immunolabeled for cone, rod or glial proteins. Postmortem tissue was from 11 eyes at Fwk 20–27; 8 eyes at Fwk 28–37; 6 eyes at postnatal 1 day to 6 weeks; 3 eyes at 9–15 months; and 5 eyes at 28 months-13 years.


At Fwk20–22 the fovea could be identified by the presence of a single layer of cones in the outer nuclear layer. Immunolabeling detected synaptic proteins, cone and rod opsins and Muller glial processes separating the photoreceptors. The foveal pit appeared at Fwk25, involving progressive peripheral displacement of ganglion cell, inner plexiform and inner nuclear layers. The pit became wider and shallower after birth, and appeared mature by 15months. Between Fwk25 and Fwk38, all photoreceptors developed more distinct inner and outer segments, but these were longer on peripheral than foveal cones. After birth the foveal outer nuclear layer became much thicker as cone packing occurred. Cone packing and neuronal migration during pit formation combined to form long central photoreceptor axons, which changed the outer plexiform layer from a thin sheet of synaptic pedicles into the thickest layer in the central retina by 15 months. Foveal inner and outer segment length matched peripheral cones by 15 months and was 4× longer by 13 years.


These data are necessary to understand the marked changes in human retina from late gestation to early adulthood. They provide qualitative and quantitative morphological information required to interpret the changes in hyper- and hypo-reflexive bands in pediatric spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) images at the same ages.


The fovea is the most critical portion of the primate retina for high visual acuity and color vision. Its early development begins at fetal week (Fwk) 12 with a complex expression sequence of cell-specific molecules17. After midgestation an outward displacement of inner retinal layers occurs to form a foveal pit, and after birth an inward displacement of the photoreceptors occurs to raise foveal cone density 10×817. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) has become a valuable tool for clinical diagnosis of normal and diseased adult human retina18. Recently, Maldonado et al.19 used a portable research hand-held SDOCT unit to image human retinas from prematures through adults. They documented the immaturity of the neonatal human fovea and the marked difference in SDOCT layers from the standard adult SDOCT image. However, there is still little detailed description of histological development and almost no quantitative information about human central retina around birth. This paper provides the first detailed histological description of human central retinal development from midgestation to early adulthood. In particular, it shows the marked change in foveal photoreceptors from a single layer of short undeveloped cones up to birth to tightly-packed and highly elongated cones in the adult. Understanding these changes is essential to make the correct interpretation of neonatal SDOCT images.


Tissue sections for this study were from eyes obtained under Human Subjects Approval #010447. Eyes younger than Fwk22 were from elective abortions; only normal-appearing fetuses were utilized. Older prenatal and neonatal eyes were from infants who survived days to weeks in the Neonatal ICU; babies with diagnosed conditions that might affect retinal development were not included in this report. Infant eyes were obtained from children who died of accidental causes, or from diseases that did not affect the retina.

Eyes were enucleated 2–8 hours after death, the cornea and lens removed and the globe immersed in a mixture of 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% glutaraldehyde in pH.7.4 phosphate buffer (PB) for 1day (d) to months. In one of the pair of eyes, the horizontal meridian was embedded in glycol methacrylate and cut serially at 2–3µm. This method gives excellent preservation and imaging of tissue. In a few eyes the entire globe was embedded in paraffin and sectioned serially at 12µm. This method was less time consuming, but the retina was usually detached from the pigment epithelium. In some eyes the horizontal meridian was frozen sectioned serially at 12µm, allowing immunolabeling at a known locus with a wide variety of antibodies. In each method, every 10th slide was stained with 1% azure II-methylene blue to locate the fovea.


Frozen sections were labeled as previously reported5, 7. The rod marker was mouse anti-rod opsin (4D2, 1/300; gift of R. Molday). Cone markers included rabbit anti-long-and-medium (L&M) wavelength-selective cone opsin (1/2000, gift of J. Saari), rabbit anti-short (S) wavelength-selective cone opsin (1/10,000, gift of J. Nathans), mouse anti-cone arrestin (7G6, 1/250–500; gift of P MacLeish); and mouse anti-cone alpha transducin (A1.1, 1/250–500; gift of J. Hurley). Mouse antisynaptophysin (1/1000; Sigma-Aldrich S5768) labels cone synaptic pedicles heavily and rod synaptic spherules lightly. Rabbit anti-cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP; 1/1000; gift of J. Saari) was used to label Müller glial cytoplasm.


All photographs were from sections in which the foveal center could be reliably identified. Plastic or paraffin sections stained with azure II-methylene blue were imaged digitally using a Nikon E1000 wide-field digital microscope. Immunolabeled sections were imaged using a high sensitivity Hamatsu camera or in an Olympus Sluoview 1000 confocal microscope. All images were processed in Adobe Photoshop CS3 for size, color balance, sharpness and contrast.

Segmentation of light micrographs

A low power foveal montage was created at selected ages. One half was imaged in Photoshop and paths drawn along the inner surface of the retina and the borders between the ganglion cell (GCL) and inner plexiform layer (IPL); the IPL and inner nuclear layer (INL); the INL and outer plexiform layer (OPL); the OPL and outer nuclear layer (ONL); and the inner border of the retinal pigment epithelium (PE). Layers were differentially shaded (Figures 27). In young retinas, the OPL was thin and included in ONL, but in older retinas the OPL was distinguished as a separate layer. A dotted path was drawn along the external limiting membrane (ELM), separating the proximal ONL from the distal inner segment/outer segment (IS/OS) layer.

Figure 2
Layers and Histology of Mid-gestation Fetal Human Retina
Figure 7
Layers and Histology of Human Retina during Childhood


Normal Adult Retina

A section from adult human retina ~2mm nasal to the fovea is shown in Figure 1 for orientation to the layers and abbreviations used in the developing retina. A young adult fovea is shown in Figure 7 Bottom row.

Figure 1
Layers and Histology of Normal Adult Human Retina

Development of the Human Fovea

Fetal Week 20–27 (11 retinas examined)

At midgestation, the future fovea had three distinctive differences from peripheral retina. First, the GCL is much thicker than in the periphery. Second, up to birth the ONL is formed by a single layer of cone photoreceptors (Figure 2 Bottom left, Figure 8 Top far left). This is in marked contrast to the thicker peripheral ONL containing both cones and rods (Figure 2 Bottom right; Figure 8 Top middle left and right). Third, the OPL is a narrow band of cone synaptic pedicles (Figure 2 Bottom left and insert, Bottom middle; Figure 8 Top far right Top and Bottom). These layers will undergo developmental changes that are critical to interpreting late prenatal and neonatal SDOCT images. In the following narrative, numbers like 800µm or 2mm indicate distance from the fovea center.

Figure 8
Immunocytochemistry of Photoreceptor Maturation

Rods are absent across the central 1500–1800µm forming a region called the rod-free zone underlying the thickened GCL5, 7. Central cones are 6–8µm wide with a large prominent nucleus (Figure 2 Bottom left insert, Figure 8 Top far left; Figure 9 Top right bottom). Each cone has a short axon (Ax) which ends below the cell body in a synaptic pedicle (Figure 2 Bottom left insert, arrow; Figure 8 Top middle left); these form the thin OPL (Figure 8 Top far left; Top row). Foveal cones are separated by Muller cell processes filling the space between cones. These end in small bulbs forming junctions with the cone cell bodies, creating the ELM (Figure 2 Bottom left white arrowhead; Figure 9 Top row).

Figure 9
Immunocytochemistry of Müller Cell Morphology

A thick short extension of cone cytoplasm, the primitive IS, can be seen distal to the ELM (Figure 2 Bottom left insert), but OS are not obvious. However, immunolabeling for opsin reveals that all central cones and rods have short OS by Fwk25 (Figure 8 Top far left to Top middle right; also see5, 7). Immunolabeling for synaptic proteins shows that all Fwk20–25 cones have pedicles which contain many synaptic markers (Figure 8 Top far right Top and Bottom). These markers indicate that, despite their immature morphology, many of the essential molecular markers for photoreceptor function are expressed by Fwk25.

Outside the rod free zone, rods become much more numerous so that by 2mm (Figure 2 Bottom right; Figure 8 Top middle left and right) the ONL is formed by a single layer of large cones and 3–4 layers of rod cell bodies. The rod cell bodies are added between the cone nuclei and pedicles, causing cone axons to lengthen. Paradoxically both cone and rod IS are longer at 2mm than in the fovea (compare Figure 2 Bottom left and right).

In most Fwk25–27 eyes (Figure 2 Top and middle right) the inner layers are displaced peripherally to form a shallow foveal pit (P). The exception was a Fwk27 fovea (Figure 2 middle left) which had a prominent doming of all layers into the vitreous and a small detachment of the cones from the PE. No pit could be detected in multiple serial sections of this eye.

Fetal week 28–37 (8 eyes examined)

All retinas had a distinct foveal pit with an outward displacement of the GCL, IPL and INL, although the pit varied in width, depth and layers involved. On the pit edges (“slope”) the INL becomes divided by a layer of pale fibers and/or cytoplasm which separates the innermost cell bodies from the remainder of the INL. This layer is the transient layer of Chievitz (TC), a common feature in primate retinas around birth5, 9, 20. Immunocytochemical labeling indicates that the TC fibers are mainly Muller cell processes (Figure 9 Bottom row) which angle away from the foveal pit, reflecting the displacement of neurons and glia peripherally as the pit forms.

Up to birth the foveal cones still form a single layer under the developing pit (Figure 3). Cones are more tapered and the vertical axis of cones on the pit slope is tilted with the apical IS end pointing toward center and the synaptic axon and pedicle pointing away (Figure 4 Top row). This tilt and INL thinning indicates that the neurons postsynaptic to the foveal cones are being displaced peripherally by pit formation. The space between the ELM and RPE is still only ~5µm wide in the fovea (Figure 4 Top left, vertical double arrows). Foveal OS can be identified but are extremely short (Figure 4 Bottom left and middle, arrowhead). Peripheral to the foveal center (Figure 4 Top middle and right) the ONL now has 2–6 deeper layers of rod cell bodies. Axons form on the foveal cones and rods on the pit slope (Figure 4 Top middle) to maintain their synaptic contacts as pit formation forces inner neurons away from the fovea. This is reflected in the axon tilt away from the photoreceptor cell bodies (Figure 4 Top right, pit center to left).

Figure 3
Layers of Late-gestation Fetal Human Retina
Figure 4
Histology of Late-gestation Fetal Human Retina

The space between the ELM and PE is 12.5µm at 800µm (Figure 4 Top middle, white vertical arrow) and 20µm at 2mm (Figure 4 Top right, white vertical arrow). Peripheral rods and cones have tapered IS and short OS which are clearly more developed than on foveal cones (compare Figure 4 Bottom left and right).

The rod-free zone is narrower, with rods present ~600µm from the pit center. This suggests that cone packing has started11, 14, although cones remain in a single layer across central retina up to birth.

Postnatal 1day-6 weeks (6 retinas examined)

The pit becomes deeper and wider after birth with the INL, IPL and GCL only 1–2 cells deep (Figure 5 Top left). A TC is still present in the INL in some retinas, even those well fixed by histological criteria. Over the pit a single layer of short cones persists (Figure 5 Top right, middle left, Bottom far left; Figure 7 Bottom middle right; Figure 8 Top far right Top), but slope cones are thinner, elongated, and are packed into 2–3 layers (Figure 5 middle right). Changes in the OPL in and around the fovea are striking after birth. Long cone axons are prominent across central retina (Figure 5 Bottom far left to middle right; Figure 8 middle and middle right) making the OPL a much thicker layer. Most cones are angled with their cell bodies closer to the pit center than their synaptic axons and pedicles (Figure 5 Bottom middle left and right, pit center to left). Central cones (Figure 5 Bottom far left and middle left) have elongated tapered IS and short OS (Figure 5 Bottom far left, white vertical arrow), but peripheral IS and OS still are longer than foveal. The gap between ELM and PE is 14µm in the fovea, and 20µm at 1mm (Figure 5 Bottom middle right) and 30µm at 2mm (Figure 5 Bottom far right) from the fovea.

Figure 5
Layers and Histology of Post-natal Term Human Retina

In this age group the two P1d retinas and one P8d were morphologically more mature than the other P8d retina (compare Figure 5 Top left and middle left). This may illustrate the expected variability both at birth and in postnatal development. The 5wk retina had increased growth in central IS and OS but in other respects resembled the P1d retina.

9–15 months (3 retinas examined)

In 2 of the 3 retinas, in the pit center the GCL, IPL and INL have fused into a single thin layer (Figure 6 Top right). The pit is wider than at earlier ages. Foveal cones are packed 2–4 nuclei deep and have thin, long IS and OS (Figure 6 Bottom far left and middle left). The axons on foveal cones further elongate as cone packing into the fovea occurs after birth. Long axons are prominent across central retina (Figure 6 Top right, Bottom middle left and far right), This formation and elongation of photoreceptor axons around the fovea eventually makes the OPL a combination of a thick layer of axons and a single layer of cone synaptic pedicles. The OPL around the fovea is much thicker than in the periphery where it contains mainly synaptic contacts (Figure 1). In the first postnatal year, synaptic pedicles are disappearing over the pit (compare Figure 6 Bottom middle left to Bottom far right) as all INL neurons are displaced peripherally. Eventually these cellular migrations eliminate the OPL entirely from the foveal center (Figure 7 top and middle). For the first time, in this age group foveal and peripheral IS and OS are similar in length (compare double arrows in Figure 6 Bottom middle left to Bottom far right). In the P13 month specimen with a detached retina, foveal IS/OS are up to 46 µm long while slope cones are 36 µm long.

Figure 6
Layers and Histology of Human Retina during Infancy

These changes around 12 month indicate that pit formation is nearing its close, that cones are still packing into the foveal center, and foveal IS and OS are elongating compared to peripheral.

28 months-13 years (5 retinas examined)

The pit becomes wider and more shallow by 3.8 years (Figure 7 Top left) with virtually no neurons left in the pit center except cone cell bodies ~8 deep. Foveal IS are much thinner than slope IS and OS are longer. The 3.8 years fovea is morphologically similar to the 13 years but has not completed cone packing as indicated by its cone density of 108,400/mm2compared to 208,200/mm2 for a 37 years adult10.

At 13 years (Figure 7 middle) the fovea appears mature in all aspects. Cone cell bodies in the foveal ONL are up to 12 deep, and the floor of the pit contains Müller cytoplasm, cone axons and the occasional neuron. Foveal cone IS are very thin and so tightly packed that it is difficult to discern single IS. There is a marked IS width gradient from foveal center to IS at 2mm (compare Figure 7 Bottom row). The IS shape is also different, being almost straight in the fovea and tapered in the rest of the retina. Foveal cone IS are 168–189 µm long and ~3µm wide throughout their length while OS are 139–155 µm long. At the first rods (~300µm) cone IS are 92–105µm long and ~6µm wide with OS 126 µm long. At 2mm OS are ~40µm long, almost 4× shorter than foveal OS.


This study shows the pronounced change in human foveal morphology in both the inner and outer layers of the retina from midgestion to early adulthood. Because assignment of layers is critical to SDOCT interpretation18, 19, understanding these qualitiative and quantitative changes allows us to establish a standard reference for pediatric SDOCT. This correlation will be presented in the following paper. The second point that emerges is the marked similarity in human foveal development compared to Old World Macaca and New World marmoset monkeys (reviewed in12, 2123). Human late fetal and infant necropsy retinas are scarce, especially with maximal preservation which allows detailed analysis of cellular development. There also is a marked similarity between adult monkey and human in SDOCT/histology24. This allows us to draw inferences about human development from well-preserved monkey fetal and infant retinas of known age. It also suggests that research into neonatal development versus SDOCT images would be feasible in monkeys.

This study documents the marked changes that occur within the central human retina after midgestation. Starting at Fwk25, outward displacements of the inner retinal layers begin to form the foveal pit. Molecular analysis of the macular region beginning at Fwk8 indicates the presence of axon guidance molecules such as pigment epithelium derived factor, natriuretic peptide precursor B, collagen type IV alpha 2 and ephrin A625, 26. These factors probably act first to repel axons and later blood vessels to form the foveal avascular zone20, 2729. Pit formation begins shortly after Fwk24–25 when the foveal avascular zone is formed29, Modeling and quantitative morphology15, 16, 30 underscore the importance of the foveal avascular zone in pit development, with intraocular pressure acting on it to initiate invagination. By 13–15 months, pit formation appears complete with a single, broken layer of neurons in the pit center.

This paper documents the dramatic changes in the outer retina which mainly occur after birth. The foveal ONL contains a single layer of cones until after birth but then attains 10–12 deep thickness by 6–8 years9, 31, 32. Cone elongation and packing are mainly postnatal events, and it is just this period in which the pit shape changes from narrow and deep to wide and shallow, presumably due to retinal stretch during eye growth16. Cone density is 18,472 cones/mm2 at Fwk 22 before a pit is apparent, doubles to 36,294 at birth when the pit is narrow, rises to 52,787 at 15 months and at 108,439 cones/mm2 is within the Bottom end of the adult range at 3.8 years10. Thus pit remodeling may influence early phases of cone packing16, 33, but the cause for doubling of density between 15 months and 3.8 years is not obvious. A correlation of fibroblast growth factor expression and cone packing has been described34, but its exact role is unclear.

Of direct interest to SDOCT imaging is the observation that from Fwk22 to birth foveal cones have short thick IS and very short OS while cones at 1–2mm have longer IS and OS. This pattern was verified in vivo through 3D mapping of premature infant photoreceptor OS on SDOCT volumes19. This was first shown by Bach and Seefelder31 who provided the first description of human foveal development, and has been noted subsequently for monkeys8, 15, 20 and humans9, 32, 35. This pattern is unexpected in that all descriptions of expression of opsin, synaptic proteins and other photoreceptor molecules in humans2, 57, 36 find expression first in and around the fovea with a subsequent progression into the periphery. Thus photoreceptor differentiation begins very early in the fovea, but further maturation is delayed until well after birth.

At birth peripheral cone IS/OS are twice as long as foveal, by 15 months foveal and peripheral IS/OS are about the same length, and by 13 years foveal OS are 4× longer than at 2mm. IS and OS growth might be suppressed to facilitate cone displacement into the fovea. However, cone density rises 1.5× between birth and 15 months when elongation begins, and then doubles between 15 months and 13 years when it finishes10, demonstrating that very long IS and OS do not inhibit most cone packing.

An additional change within the outer retina is the postnatal elongation of cone and central rod axons. This changes the OPL from a thin layer of synaptic terminals to a layer as thick or thicker than the ONL. Photoreceptor axons are formed as a result of neuronal displacements in foveal development8, 13, 23. Foveal photoreceptors form synapses before midgestation36; (also see Figure 8 Top far right) with INL neurons. As these neurons are displaced peripherally by pit formation, photoreceptor axons elongate to keep contact. Axons must elongate further after birth when photoreceptors are displaced centrally to raise cone density. Thus photoreceptor axons form to retain synaptic integrity during these two opposing neuronal movements.

This paper expands the existing literature and shows that the human fovea develops over a very long period. Morphologically the incipient fovea can be identified at Fwk11–12 by its characteristic lamination. In the last half of gestation the pit forms by GCL, IPL and INL displacement which is finished by 1–2 years. Foveal cones change little in late gestation but in the first year after birth, they become elongated cells with long IS, OS and axons, and by 4–6 years develop the longest IS and OS in the retina. Concurrently, cones are packed into the fovea to raise cone density 10×. These processes are completed before 10 years when the fovea has its adult characteristics.

Now that technical advances in SDOCT imaging have made it possible to study pre-and neonatal human eyes, the data presented here will be critical in interpreting clinical images of retinal microstructures in young infants. These histological data provide a reference of normal development which will aid in the diagnosis of abnormal development detected in SDOCT imaging.



Supported by the Heed Ophthalmic Foundation (LV). This research was made possible by the following grants: The Hartwell Foundation Biomedical Research Award (CAT); NIH Core Grants for Vision Research EY5722 and EY01730, Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB) Unrestricted Grant to Washington University, and RPB Physician Scientist Award (CAT).


An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms403986b1.gif

Cynthia A. Toth, M.D.

Professor of Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering Duke University

Cynthia A. Toth, Professor of Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering at Duke University, is a clinician-scientist, vitreoretinal surgeon. She directs the Duke Advanced Research in SDOCT Imaging Laboratory (DARSI Lab). Her translational research interests include ophthalmic diagnostics outside of conventional clinical settings, microsurgical instrumentation, and novel imaging biomarkers to improve the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for adults and children with vitreoretinal disease.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms403986b2.gif

Anita Hendrickson, Ph.D.

University of Washington Department of Biology

Anita Hendrickson, Ph.D., is Professor Emerita of Ophthalmology and Biological Structure, University of Washington. She has published 175 peer-reviewed papers and reviews on primate brain and retinal development. Her work on primate foveal structure and development has been recognized by the Paul Kayser International Award of Merit in Retina Research (1998), Proctor Medal from Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (2002), and University Distinguished Faculty Lecturer in Medicine (2004).


Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Financial Disclosures:

Cynthia A. Toth receives royalties through her university from Alcon; obtained research support for other studies from Bioptigen, Genentech and Physical Sciences Inc. The other authors have no conflicts.

Contribution of Each Author:

Conception and design (AH, CAT)

Analysis and Interpretation of the data (AH, DP, LV, CAT)

Writing the article (AH, CAT)

Critical Revision of the article (AH, DP, LV, CAT)

Final approval of the article (AH, CAT)

Data Collection (AH, DP)

Provision of materials, patients, or resources (AH, CAT)

Statement about Conformity with Author Information: Postmortem specimens were obtained under University of Washington Human Subjects Approval #010447.


1. Seiler MJ, Aramant RB. Photoreceptor and glial markers in human embryonic retina and in human embryonic retinal transplants to rat retina. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1994;80(1-2):81–95. [PubMed]
2. Nag TC, Wadhwa S. Expression of GABA in the fetal, postnatal, and adult human retinas: an immunohistochemical study. Vis Neurosci. 1997;14(3):425–432. [PubMed]
3. Nag TC, Wadhwa S. Developmental expression of calretinin immunoreactivity in the human retina and a comparison with two other EF-hand calcium binding proteins. Neuroscience. 1999;91(1):41–50. [PubMed]
4. Milam AH, Hendrickson AE, Xiao M, et al. Localization of tubby-like protein 1 in developing and adult human retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(8):2352–2356. [PubMed]
5. Xiao M, Hendrickson A. Spatial and temporal expression of short, long/medium, or both opsins in human fetal cones. J Comp Neurol. 2000;425(4):545–559. [PubMed]
6. O'Brien KM, Schulte D, Hendrickson AE. Expression of photoreceptor-associated molecules during human fetal eye development. Mol Vis. 2003;9:401–409. [PubMed]
7. Hendrickson A, Bumsted-O'Brien K, Natoli R, Ramamurthy V, Possin D, Provis J. Rod photoreceptor differentiation in fetal and infant human retina. Exp Eye Res. 2008;87(5):415–426. [PubMed]
8. Hendrickson A, Kupfer C. The histogenesis of the fovea in the macaque monkey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 15(9):746–756. 976. [PubMed]
9. Hendrickson AE, Yuodelis C. The morphological development of the human fovea. Ophthalmology. 1984;91(6):603–612. [PubMed]
10. Yuodelis C, Hendrickson A. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the human fovea during development. Vision Res. 1986;26(6):847–855. [PubMed]
11. Diaz-Araya C, Provis JM. Evidence of photoreceptor migration during early foveal development: a quantitative analysis of human fetal retinae. Vis Neurosci. 1992;8(6):505–514. [PubMed]
12. Hendrickson A. A morphological comparison of foveal development in man and monkey. Eye (Lond) 1992;6(2):136–144. [PubMed]
13. Packer O, Hendrickson AE, Curcio CA. Development redistribution of photoreceptors across the Macaca nemestrina (pigtail macaque) retina. The J Comp Neurol. 1990;298(4):472–493. [PubMed]
14. Robinson SR, Hendrickson A. Shifting relationships between photoreceptors and pigment epithelial cells in monkey retina: implications for the development of retinal topography. Vis Neurosci. 1995;12(4):767–778. [PubMed]
15. Springer AD, Hendrickson AE. Development of the primate area of high acuity. 2. Quantitative morphological changes associated with retinal and pars plana growth. Vis Neurosci. 2004;21(5):775–790. [PubMed]
16. Springer AD, Hendrickson AE. Development of the primate area of high acuity, 3: temporal relationships between pit formation, retinal elongation and cone packing. Vis Neurosci. 2005;22(2):171–185. [PubMed]
17. Springer AD, Troilo D, Possin D, Hendrickson AE. Foveal cone density shows a rapid postnatal maturation in the marmoset monkey. Vis Neurosci. 2011;28(6):473–484. [PubMed]
18. Spaide RF, Curcio CA. Anatomical correlates to the bands seen in the outer retina by optical coherence tomography: literature review and model. Retina. 2011;31(8):1609–1619. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Maldonado RS, O'Connell RV, Sarin N, et al. Dynamics of human foveal development after premature birth. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(12):2315–2325. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Hendrickson A, Troilo D, Possin D, Springer A. Development of the neural retina and its vasculature in the marmoset Callithrix jacchus. J Comp Neurol. 2006;497(2):270–286. [PubMed]
21. Curcio CA, Hendrickson A. Organization and Development of the Primate Photoreceptor Mosaic. In: Osborne N, Chader J, editors. Progress in retinal research. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1991. pp. 89–120.
22. Provis JM, Diaz CM, Dreher B. Ontogeny of the primate fovea: a central issue in retinal development. Prog Neurobiol. 1998;54(5):549–580. [PubMed]
23. Hendrickson A, Provis J. Sernagor E. Retinal development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Comparison of development of the primate fovea centralis with peripheral retina; pp. 126–149.
24. Anger EM, Unterhuber A, Hermann B, et al. Ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography of the monkey fovea. Identification of retinal sublayers by correlation with semithin histology sections. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78(6):1117–1125. [PubMed]
25. Kozulin P, Natoli R, O'Brien KM, Madigan MC, Provis JM. Differential expression of anti-angiogenic factors and guidance genes in the developing macula. Mol Vis. 2009;15:45–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Kozulin P, Natoli R, Madigan MC, O'Brien KM, Provis JM. Gradients of Eph-A6 expression in primate retina suggest roles in both vascular and axon guidance. Mol Vis. 2009;15:2649–2662. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Gariano RF, Iruela-Arispe ML, Hendrickson AE. Vascular development in primate retina: comparison of laminar plexus formation in monkey and human. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35(9):3442–3455. [PubMed]
28. Provis JM, Sandercoe T, Hendrickson AE. Astrocytes and blood vessels define the foveal rim during primate retinal development. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(10):2827–2836. [PubMed]
29. Provis JM, Hendrickson AE. The foveal avascular region of developing human retina. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(4):507–511. [PubMed]
30. Springer AD, Hendrickson AE. Development of the primate area of high acuity. 1. Use of finite element analysis models to identify mechanical variables affecting pit formation. Vis Neurosci. 2004;21(1):53–62. [PubMed]
31. Bach L, Seefelder R. Atlas zur entwicklungsgeschichte des menschlichen auges. Leipzig: W. Engelmann; 1914. pp. 1–148.
32. Abramov I, Gordon J, Hendrickson A, Hainline L, Dobson V, LaBossiere E. The retina of the newborn human infant. Science. 1982;217(4556):265–267. [PubMed]
33. Springer AD. New role for the primate fovea: a retinal excavation determines photoreceptor deployment and shape. Vis Neurosci. 1999;16(4):629–636. [PubMed]
34. Cornish EE, Natoli RC, Hendrickson A, Provis JM. Differential distribution of fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) on foveal cones: FGFR-4 is an early marker of cone photoreceptors. Mol Vis. 2004;10:1–14. [PubMed]
35. Hendrickson A, Drucker D. The development of parafoveal and mid-peripheral human retina. Behav Brain Res. 1992;49(1):21–31. [PubMed]
36. Nag TC, Wadhwa S. Differential expression of syntaxin-1 and synaptophysin in the developing and adult human retina. J Biosci. 2001;26(2):179–191. [PubMed]