PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Ann Intern Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 28.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3508679
NIHMSID: NIHMS422668

Therapy-Related Acute Myelogenous Leukemia in a Hydroxyurea-Treated Patient With Sickle Cell Anemia

Background

Hydroxyurea is an antimetabolite that minimizes pain and prolongs survival in patients with sickle cell anemia (1). It is not widely prescribed because of concerns about late effects, including cancer (2), and its leukemogenic risk is extrapolated from its reported risk in myeloproliferative disorders (3). Few cases of leukemia in patients with sickle cell anemia have been described, and only half of them report cytogenetics (4). Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in patients with sickle cell anemia receiving hydroxyurea treatment is exceptionally rare, but data on its true incidence are insufficient (1, 2). Whether AML in hydroxyurea-treated patients with sickle cell anemia is coincidental or related to therapy remains an unanswered question (2).

Objective

To report a unique combination of sickle cell anemia, hydroxyurea treatment, and short-latency leukemia of erythroid origin that presented a diagnostic challenge and underscored leukemogenic potential.

Methods and Findings

A 33-year-old man with sickle cell anemia began treatment with hydroxyurea, 9.0 mg/kg daily, after 1 year of ambulatory pain and recurrent priapism requiring hospitalization. At baseline, the patient had a leukocyte count of 14 700 X 109 cells/L, hemoglobin level of 7.2 g/dL, and fetal hemoglobin level of 5.1%. Four years later, he was receiving hydroxyurea, 18 mg/kg daily, and the response was excellent (maximum fetal hemoglobin level, 35.6%; maximum mean corpuscular volume, 131.0 fL), although administration was interrupted by onset of transient neutropenia (Figure, panel A). The patient was later hospitalized and received transfusions for the acute chest syndrome. Hydroxyurea was withheld due to onset of neutropenia 2 weeks later. Follow-up again showed profound neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, 0.120 X 109 cells/L), a leukocyte count of 0.670 X 109 cells/L, and a platelet count of 102 000 X 109 cells/L. Peripheral blood smear showed 44% blasts, consistent with normoblasts, megaloblastic changes, and marked dyserythropoiesis in numerous circulating nucleated erythrocytes (Figure, panel B). We ruled out delayed transfusion reaction and folate or B12 deficiency. Bone marrow biopsy showed hypercellularity with myeloid hypoplasia and erythroid hyperplasia with markedly left-shifted maturation and an increased erythroblast count. There was no increase in myeloblast count. Immunocytochemistry showed that blasts were positive for spectrin, hemoglobin, and CD117 and were negative for myeloperoxidase, CD34, glycophorin, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase, CD68, and factor VIII (von Willebrand factor), indicating malignant cells of early erythroid origin (Figure, panel B). Standard flow cytometry showed less than 2% myeloblasts. Pure erythroid leukemia (Di Guglielmo disease or French-American-British M6b AML) was suspected; however, massive erythroid recovery due to marrow in farctions occurring during the acute chest syndrome was also in the differential diagnosis. Cytogenetic analysis showed that 14 out of 20 marrow metaphase cells were abnormal, with significant karyotypic heterogeneity. The composite karyotype had 44 to 46 chromosomes with a recurring unbalanced rearrangement of chromosome arm 5q, deletion of chromosome arm 7q, loss of chromosomes 15 to 22 and Y, and 5 marker chromosomes, suggesting the myelodysplastic syndrome or AML. Clonal abnormalities enabled diagnosis of pure erythroid leukemia. Induction therapy with cytarabine and idarubicin produced a cytogenetic remission. Sibling-matched stem cell transplantation after cyclophosphamide therapy, fludarabine therapy, and irradiation was unsuccessful, and relapse occurred 4 months later. Flow cytometry demonstrated that 33% blasts were coexpressing CD117, CD38, and CD33. Bone marrow biopsy showed sheets of erythroblasts. Neither salvage chemotherapy nor donor lymphocyte infusion yielded a response. The patient died 9 months after diagnosis.

Figure 1
Case synopsis of AML, with images from peripheral blood and bone marrow

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first case of sickle cell anemia associated with AML of erythroid origin and a complex karyotype that meets the immunophenotype criteria for pure erythroid leukemia and, of note, therapy-related AML following the 2008 World Health Organization classification (5). This case is unique for development after 50 months of hydroxyurea treatment compared with an average AML latency of 8 years in myeloproliferative disorders. Short latency and genomic instability suggest a therapy-related cause, although complex karyotype AML is not characteristic of hydroxyurea treatment in the absence of a myeloproliferative disorder (3, 5). The potential role of antimetabolites in therapy-related AML and suggestions for expanding hydroxyurea treatment to children and others with sickle cell anemia not meeting current U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines highlight the need for long-term studies with bone marrow cytogenetics to determine whether these rare cases represent true therapy-related AML in patients with sickle cell anemia (2, 5). Even if risk for therapy-related AML was proven, it would need to be weighed against the intrinsic mortality of untreated sickle cell anemia.

References

1. Steinberg MH, McCarthy WF, Castro O, Ballas SK, Armstrong FD, Smith W, et al. Investigators of the Multicenter Study of Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Anemia and MSH Patients' Follow-Up. The risks and benefits of long-term use of hydroxyurea in sickle cell anemia: A 17.5 year follow-up. Am J Hematol. 2010;85:403–408. [PMID: 20513116] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Lanzkron S, Strouse JJ, Wilson R, Beach MC, Haywood C, Park H, et al. Systematic review: Hydroxyurea for the treatment of adults with sickle cell disease. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:939–955. [PMID: 18458272]. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Kiladjian JJ, Rain JD, Bernard JF, Briere J, Chomienne C, Fenaux P. Long-term incidence of hematological evolution in three French prospective studies of hydroxyurea and pipobroman in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006;32:417–421. [PMID: 16810617] [PubMed]
4. Ferster A, Sariban E, Meuleman N. Belgian Registry of Sickle Cell Disease patients treated with Hydroxyurea. Malignancies in sickle cell disease patients treated with hydroxyurea [Letter] Br J Haematol. 2003;123:368–369. [PMID: 14531924] [PubMed]
5. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;114:937–951. [PMID: 19357394] [PubMed]