Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2012; 7(11): e50024.
Published online 2012 November 21. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0050024
PMCID: PMC3503716

Unimpaired Skin Carcinogenesis in Desmoglein 3 Knockout Mice

Amanda Ewart Toland, Editor


The contribution of adherens junction inactivation, typically by downregulation or mutation of the transmembrane core component E-cadherin, to cancer progression is well recognized. In contrast, the role of the desmosomal cadherin components of the related cell-cell adhesion junction, the desmosome, in cancer development has not been well explored. Here, we use mouse models to probe the functional role of desmosomal cadherins in carcinogenesis. Because mice lacking the desmosomal cadherin Desmoglein 3 (Dsg3) have revealed a crucial role for Dsg3 in cell-cell adhesion in stratified epithelia, we investigate the consequence of Dsg3 loss in two models of skin carcinogenesis. First, using Dsg3−/− keratinocytes, we show that these cells display adhesion defects in vitro and compromised tumor growth in allograft assays, suggesting that Dsg3 enables tumor formation in certain settings. In contrast, using an autochthonous model for SCC development in response to chronic UVB treatment, we discover a surprising lack of enhanced tumorigenesis in Dsg3−/− mice relative to controls, unlike mice lacking the desmosomal component Perp. Accordingly, there is no defect in the apoptotic response to UVB or enhanced immune cell infiltration upon Dsg3 loss that could promote tumorigenesis. Thus, Dsg3 does not display a clear function as a tumor suppressor in these mouse skin cancer models. Continued unraveling of the roles of Dsg3 and other desmosomal constituents in carcinogenesis in different contexts will be important for ultimately improving cancer diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment.


The vast majority of human cancers, known as carcinomas, arise from epithelia. Defining the factors that govern the normal architecture and function of epithelia, and how these can be perturbed, is therefore essential for understanding cancer development. Critical for the integrity of epithelia are various intercellular adhesion junctions, including adherens junctions and desmosomes [1]. Whereas adherens junctions are fundamental both for intercellular adhesion in epithelia and for enabling the dynamic rearrangements of epithelia [2], desmosomes are pivotal for reinforcing adhesion between epithelial cells via anchorage to the intermediate filament network [1], [3]. Adherens junctions mediate cell-cell interaction through the extracellular domains of transmembrane classical cadherins, the prototype of which is E-cadherin, and then communicate with the actin cytoskeleton through interactions with beta-catenin and alpha-catenin [4], [5], [6], [7]. Similarly, desmosomes establish cell-cell contact through transmembrane desmosomal cadherins, the desmogleins (DSG1-4) and the desmocollins (DSC1-3), which associate by homophilic and heterophilic interactions [8], [9]. The cytoplasmic domains of these transmembrane cadherins interact with members of the armadillo protein family known as plakophilins (PKP1-3) and plakoglobin (PG), which then connect to the intermediate filament network through desmoplakins (DSP1 and 2). Another important desmosome component, revealed through genetic knockout and immunogold electron microscopy studies, is the tetraspan membrane protein Perp. Perp null mice display profound blistering of the oral mucosa and skin due to fewer and structurally abnormal desmosomes [10].

It has been well established that the adherens junction component E-cadherin has a central role in cancer. E-cadherin is mutated or downregulated during the progression of many human cancers to an invasive and metastatic stage [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. The importance of E-cadherin loss in cancer progression has been clearly demonstrated in mouse models in vivo, where the artificial maintenance of E-cadherin expression in a pancreas islet cell tumor model caused tumors to arrest at the adenoma stage, while inactivation of E-cadherin caused tumors to progress from adenomas to carcinoma [17]. Moreover, ablation of E-cadherin in a mouse model of mammary cancer promoted tumor initiation and metastasis [18]. Thus, E-cadherin is critical for preventing tumor progression.

In contrast, the role of the desmosomal cadherins in carcinogenesis has remained unclear, in part because of contradictory reports in the literature. For example, loss of DSG1 expression has been observed during human skin carcinogenesis and is associated with worse prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) [19], [20], and loss of DSG3 and DSC3 expression was noted during human oral squamous carcinoma development, suggesting roles for these desmogleins as tumor suppressors [21]. In support of this notion, epigenetic silencing of DSC3 is common in human breast cancer [22]. In contrast, DSG2 expression is increased in some malignant skin carcinomas [23], and transgenic expression of Dsg2 in the differentiating layers of epidermis rendered mice susceptible to papilloma development, suggesting a pro-tumorigenic role for this desmosomal constituent [24]. Moreover, overexpression of DSG3 is correlated with malignant progression of human sinonasal inverted papillomas [25] and with development of cancers of the head, neck and lung [26], [27], also reflecting an oncogenic function for DSG3. An oncogenic role for DSG3 is further supported by in vitro experiments showing that DSG3 knockdown inhibits tumor growth and invasion in various head and neck cancer cell lines [26] and impairs epithelial cell proliferation [28]. These conflicting findings underscore the necessity for performing studies in mouse genetic models, in which the effects of modulating desmosomal constituents on carcinogenesis can be clearly interrogated through the use of knockout mice, to define the role of desmosomal cadherins in cancer development.

To better understand the role of desmosomal cadherins in cancer, we employed mice lacking the desmosomal cadherin Dsg3, which are viable yet in which Dsg3 plays key physiological roles in cell-cell adhesion, as Dsg3 deficiency induces blisters of the oral mucosa and hair follicle defects. Here, we analyze the consequence of Dsg3 nullizygosity for skin cancer development using two different tumor models. We first analyzed tumor development in an allograft model in which transformed keratinocytes with differing Dsg3 status were implanted subcutaneously into immunocompromised mice. We also used an autochthonous model to compare SCC incidence in Dsg3−/− mice relative to controls in response to chronic UVB treatment. Our analysis of the contribution of Dsg3 to cancer development in these two settings suggest that, unlike E-cadherin, Dsg3 loss is not sufficient to promote carcinogenesis and that Dsg3 does not display clear tumor suppressor activity.

Materials and Methods

Keratinocyte Culture

Keratinocytes were derived from P0.5–P1.5 mouse skin as described [10]. Cells were grown on collagen/fibronectin-coated dishes and maintained in an undifferentiated state by growing the cells in low calcium EMEM (Lonza) containing 0.05 mM calcium, 8% dialyzed FCS, and antibiotics. Cells were then differentiated for 24 hrs in the same media as the undifferentiated cells, except that the calcium concentration was raised to 2 mM.


Immunofluorescence was performed essentially as described [29]. Primary antibodies used for immunofluorescence include the following: rabbit anti-Perp [10] (1[ratio]200), mouse anti-desmoplakin clone 115F (gift from David Garrod, University of Manchester; 1[ratio]50), chicken anti-plakoglobin 1408 (gift from Kathleen Green, Northwestern University; 1[ratio]100), mouse anti-desmoglein 1+2 4B2 (gift from Kathleen Green, Northwestern University; 1[ratio]100), goat anti-desmoglein 3 M-20 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1[ratio]50), mouse anti-desmoglein 1 18-D4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1[ratio]100), mouse anti-plakophilin 3 23E3/4 (Zymed; 1[ratio]250), rat anti-E-cadherin ECC-2 (Invitrogen; 1/500). Secondary antibodies used included FITC goat anti-rabbit (Vector Laboratories, 1[ratio]300) and Alexa 546 donkey anti-mouse (Invitrogen; 1[ratio]300). Fluorescence images were examined using a Leica DM6000B microscope (Leica Microsystems), and images were acquired using a Retiga Exi Camera (Q imaging) and Image Pro 6.2 software from Media Cybernetics.

Protein Preparation and Immunoblotting

For skin protein preparation, skin was snap-frozen and homogenized using a chilled mortar and pestle. For keratinocyte protein extracts, plated cells were washed with PBS and chilled buffer was added. For Triton-soluble protein fractions, cells or skin samples were resuspended in 1% Triton X-100/0.1% SDS solubilization buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris pH8, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP40), rocked for one hour at 4°C, and the supernatant was isolated by centrifugation. The urea-soluble protein fraction was obtained by resuspending the Triton-insoluble material from this preparation in the same buffer +9M urea. Total protein extracts were made by direct lysis in 9M urea buffer. Western blotting was performed according to standard methods, with 25–50 µg of protein in each lane.

Mechanical Dissociation Assay

The mechanical dissociation assay was performed as described previously [30]. Briefly, primary mouse epidermal keratinocytes were seeded in 6-well plates and grown to confluence in EMEM media containing 0.07 mM CaCl2. Cells were then differentiated for 24 hours by raising the calcium concentration in the media to 0.5 mM. After two washes with PBS, the adherent keratinocytes were incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes with 2.4 units of dispase I (Roche Applied Sciences), resulting in a non-adherent cell monolayer. The monolayers were carefully washed twice with PBS, transferred to 15 ml conical tubes and subjected to mechanical stress by inverting the conical tube thirty times. Cellular fragments were transferred to 35-mm tissue culture dishes and were imaged using a digital camera then counted. We performed these experiments in triplicate on three independent batches of mixed background Dsg3+/+ and Dsg3−/− keratinocytes. The dispase assay was performed on each well, and 6 different fields were counted for each well, with the number of fragments per field ranging from 20 to 100. The number of fragments counted in each field (18 counts per genotype per experiment) was averaged and the standard deviation calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test.

Lentiviral Infection and Allograft Tumor Assays

Lentiviruses were produced by transiently transfecting 293 FT cells with 2.5 µg of packaging vectors (pMD2.G and psPAX2) along with 5 µg of a lentiviral vector encoding mutant H-RasV12 (gift from Michelle Marques, Stanford University). Infections were performed by incubating mouse keratinocytes with the produced virus in the presence of 8 µM polybrene for one hour. To increase the infection efficiency, cells were spun at 180 g during the process then subjected to selection for 72 hours in 5 µg/ml blasticidin. For the allograft tumor assays, 5×105 transformed keratinocytes were injected into the flanks of IcrTac:ICR-Prkdcscid mice (Taconic). The mice were injected at 6 weeks of age, and tumors were allowed to grow for 5 weeks. Mice were then sacrificed, and tumor volume was measured with calipers.

Ethics Statement

All animal studies were approved by the Stanford University Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care and were performed in strict accordance with IACUC guidelines.


Five µm sections of formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded mouse tongue tissue or tumors were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Slides were examined with brightfield microscopy using the microscope and imaging software described for immunofluorescence analysis.

Tumor study

Dsg3+/− mice were intercrossed to obtain cohorts of Dsg3+/+ and Dsg3−/− mice on a 129/Sv;C57BL/6 mixed background. Specifically, 6 pairs of Dsg3+/− mice, of genetically similar background (all siblings or first cousins) were bred, and cohorts of 23 wild-type mice and 11 Dsg3−/− mice were generated for the tumor study. At 10 weeks of age, mice were exposed to chronic UVB light treatment (2.5 kJ/m2, three times a week, for 30 weeks). Mice were shaved on a weekly basis and treated using Kodacel-filtered FS40 sunlamps. Mice were placed 5 in a cage and allowed to roam freely during treatment. Cages were rotated along the shelf below the light bulbs before each treatment to compensate for uneven distribution of energy along the bulbs. Mice were monitored for tumor development by visual inspection.

In vivo Apoptosis Assays

Cohorts of 10-week old Dsg3/ and Dsg3+/+ mice were generated. After shaving the dorsal skin of mice, they were placed underneath a Kodacel filter and allowed to roam freely in their cage during UVB treatment. Half of the dorsal skin was exposed to a one-time dose of 2.5 kJ/m2 of UVB irradiation while the other half was blocked with tape. 24 hours later, the dorsal skin of the mice was collected, processed, and immunostained for cleaved Caspase 3. Apoptosis, indicated by cleaved Caspase 3-positivity, was quantified in at least 2–3 cm of skin per mouse.

Toluidine Blue Staining

Tissue samples were fixed overnight in 10% formalin, processed, and embedded using standard procedures. Samples were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and unmasked using Trilogy (Cell Marque) in a pressure cooker for 15 minutes according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were then rinsed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and stained using toluidine blue [29]. Samples were mounted with Mowiol (EMD Chemicab).


Dsg3 Loss Compromises Adhesion in Keratinocytes

To characterize the role of Dsg3 in cultured primary keratinocytes, we first analyzed the impact of Dsg3 loss on desmosome function using mouse keratinocytes grown in high calcium medium to induce desmosome formation. We first assessed the consequences of Dsg3 deficiency on the localization of individual desmosomal constituents using immunofluorescence analysis for various desmosomal components in Dsg3+/+, Dsg3+/−, and Dsg3−/− mouse keratinocytes (Fig. 1A). All desmosomal components examined displayed apparently normal membrane localization in Dsg3−/− mouse keratinocytes, similar to that observed in heterozygous and wild-type counterparts, indicating that Dsg3 deficiency does not dramatically affect membrane targeting of other desmosome components. To ascertain whether desmosomes were functionally impaired, we used a solubility assay based on the fact that correctly formed desmosomal complexes can be solubilized only by chaotropic agents such as urea, while improperly assembled desmosomal components can be solubilized by the nonionic detergent Triton X-100 [31]. We assessed whether desmosomal components exhibited increased Triton X-100-solubility in the absence of Dsg3. Surprisingly, no differences were found in the solubilization properties of desmosome proteins in Dsg3−/− and wild-type keratinocytes, although increased levels of the other desmogleins, Perp, and Pkp3 were detected in the insoluble fraction of Dsg3−/− keratinocytes compared to controls (Fig. 1B). The ultimate test of an effect on cell-cell adhesion however, is an assay known as the mechanical dissociation assay. To determine whether Dsg3 loss compromises cell-cell adhesion in cultured keratinocytes, we subjected wild-type and Dsg3−/− keratinocyte monolayers to a mechanical stress and quantified the number of resulting fragments. We found that the number of fragments released was significantly greater in Dsg3−/− keratinocytes than in controls (Fig. 1C), revealing a defect in cell-cell adhesion in the absence of Dsg3, consistent with the in vivo adhesion deficits associated with Dsg3 loss [32], [33]. Together, these findings indicate that Dsg3−/− keratinocytes display defective desmosomal adhesion, although associated with only subtle changes in desmosomal components in the immunofluorescence and solubility assays we utilized.

Figure 1
Dsg3 deficiency in keratinocytes does not dramatically affect localization or solubility of other desmosomal components, but does compromise cell-cell adhesion.

Dsg3 Deficiency Impedes Allograft Tumor Growth

Given that Dsg3 loss compromised cell-cell adhesion in keratinocytes, we sought initially to examine the consequence of Dsg3 loss to tumorigenesis using a keratinocyte-based allograft assay. We used Dsg3−/− and Dsg3+/− control keratinocytes transformed through activated H-Ras expression and p53 inactivation because these represent key lesions for the development of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in vivo (Fig. 2A, B) [34], [35], [36]. We tested the tumorigenic potential of these cells by injecting them into the flanks of immunocompromised Scid mice and assessing tumor growth. After five weeks, at which time mice were sacrificed and tumor volume was calculated (Fig. 2C), all mice injected with transformed Dsg3+/− keratinocytes developed tumors, whereas only 80% of the mice injected with transformed Dsg3−/− keratinocytes developed tumors (data not shown). While tumor histology was similar in the two cohorts, the tumors derived from transformed Dsg3−/− keratinocytes showed a clearly reduced volume compared to tumors derived from transformed Dsg3+/− keratinocytes (Fig. 2C and D). These findings suggest that Dsg3 facilitates, rather than inhibits, tumor growth in transformed keratinocytes.

Figure 2
Dsg3 facilitates transformed keratinocyte allograft tumor growth.

Dsg3 Deficiency does not Promote UVB-induced SCC Development

The data from the allograft assays suggest that Dsg3 enables tumor growth in vivo. In contrast, we recently found that loss of another key desmosome component, Perp, promotes carcinogenesis in an autochthonous model for SCC development in the skin driven by UVB-exposure [29]. To investigate whether Dsg3 deficiency can, similarly to Perp loss, sometimes promote cancer, we sought to examine tumor development in Dsg3−/− mice. As reported, we noted Dsg3−/− mice display clear desmosomal defects in their stratified epithelia, including blistering in the oral mucosa and hair loss (Fig. 3A, B) [32], [33]. We thus tested whether desmosome compromise associated with Dsg3 deficiency could promote UVB-induced tumor development in the skin. We subjected 10-week old Dsg3−/− or control wild-type mice to chronic UVB treatment for 30 weeks (Fig. 3C). Tumor latency, size, and multiplicity were monitored throughout the study. Surprisingly, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in tumor latency between the two cohorts (Fig. 3D). Similarly, the average tumor size was not clearly different between Dsg3 null and wild-type mice (Fig. 3E). Histological analysis demonstrated that tumors arising in both wild-type and Dsg3−/− mice were SCCs and sarcomas, as described [37], and that these tumor types arose at similar proportions, irrespective of genotype (Fig. 3F). In addition, because our previous findings indicated that Perp deficiency not only stimulated tumor initiation but also SCC progression, we analyzed the tumor grade of SCCs resulting from chronic UVB exposure. Grading of tumors in both cohorts failed to reveal differences in the degree of SCC differentiation between the two cohorts of mice, with 50%, 30% and 20% of the SCCs in each cohort appearing well differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated, respectively (Fig. 3G). Collectively, these results indicate that Dsg3 loss has a minimal effect on UVB-induced SCC development. Thus, unlike Perp loss, Dsg3 inactivation is not sufficient to promote carcinogenesis in the epidermis upon UVB exposure.

Figure 3
Dsg3 does not affect tumor incidence, tumor volume, or tumor grade in UVB-induced skin carcinogenesis.

Apoptosis and Immune Cell Infiltration Appear Uncompromised by Dsg3 Loss

The dramatic enhancement of UVB-induced skin carcinogenesis in Perp-deficient mice is likely at least in part due to the fact that Perp loss compromises UVB-induced apoptosis, enhancing survival of cells that have sustained DNA damage and which may have accrued oncogenic mutations. Indeed, not only Perp, but also another desmosomal component, Dsg1, is critical for UV-induced apoptosis [29], [38]. To better understand the failure of Dsg3 loss to enhance UVB-induced skin cancer development, we therefore examined whether Dsg3 deficiency impaired the apoptotic response in the epidermis after UVB treatment. Dsg3+/+ and Dsg3−/− mice were treated with 2.5 kJ/m2 UVB, and 24 hours later, the skin was analyzed for apoptosis using immunohistochemistry for cleaved caspase 3, a marker of apoptosis (Fig. 4A, 4B). Quantification failed to reveal, however, a difference in apoptotic indices in the epidermis of UVB-treated Dsg3 null and wild-type mice, suggesting a rationale for the lack of enhanced tumor phenotype in UVB-treated Dsg3−/− mice.

Figure 4
Dsg3 deficiency does not affect UVB-induced apoptosis or immune cell infiltration in vivo.

Another mechanism through which Perp loss may contribute to UVB-induced skin cancer is through the recruitment of inflammatory cells that could promote cancer. Perp inactivation, combined with chronic UVB treatment for 19 weeks, led to an increase in immune cell infiltration, specifically mast cells, in the skin relative to wild-type controls [29]. We therefore compared mast cell infiltration in wild-type and Dsg3−/− mice after chronic UVB treatment by staining the epidermis with toluidine blue, an indicator of mast cells. Unlike the Perp-deficient mice, no significant differences were found in the number of mast cells in the skin of Dsg3−/− and control mice (Fig. 4C, D). Thus, despite manifesting clear deficits in cell-cell adhesion, no effects on UVB-induced apoptosis or immune cell recruitment were evident in the UVB-treated Dsg3−/− mice, providing a potential explanation for the absence of an increased tumor predisposition in Dsg3−/− mice in the UVB-induced carcinogenesis model.

Desmosomal Cadherins are Upregulated in the Skin of Dsg3−/− Mice

Dsg3 is part of a family of desmosomal cadherins family comprising Dsgs 1–4 [39], and therefore other desmogleins could potentially at least partially compensate for Dsg3 deficiency. To understand the minimal effect of Dsg3 loss on UVB-induced SCC development, we sought to determine the effects of Dsg3 loss on desmosomal components in the skin using a solubility assay. While no clear difference in solubility pattern was noted between wild-type and Dsg3−/− skin, we did detect increased Dsg1 and Dsg2 levels in the Dsg3−/− skin, suggesting that these proteins are upregulated upon Dsg3 deficiency (Fig. 5). The upregulation of Dsg1 and 2 upon Dsg3 loss may compensate for deficiency in some Dsg3 functions and could explain the lack of phenotypes in the UVB-induced tumor model.

Figure 5
Dsg3 loss in the skin results in Dsg1 and Dsg2 upregulation.


Although the role of adherens junctions constituents, particularly E-cadherin, in cancer development has been extensively studied, there has been limited functional investigation of the role of desmosomal cadherins in carcinogenesis. In this study, we set out to address the contribution of desmosomal cadherins to cancer development using a mouse genetic approach. In particular, we focused on Dsg3 and its role in SCC development, using two different models, and we found that the role of Dsg3 in cancer varies slightly according to context. In vitro, Dsg3 null keratinocytes have a clear defect in cell-cell adhesion compared to wild-type cells, and interestingly, transformed Dsg3−/− keratinocytes form smaller tumors than transformed control keratinocytes in allograft tumor assays. These findings suggest that intact desmosomal adhesion facilitates tumorigenesis in this context. In contrast, using an autochthonous model for SCC development in the skin driven by UVB-exposure, we failed to detect any effect of altering Dsg3 status on tumor development. Moreover, unlike mice lacking the desmosomal component Perp, which are prone to UVB-induced SCC, no impairment in the apoptotic response to UVB and no increase in immune cell infiltration were observed in Dsg3−/− mice relative to wild-type mice. This observation thus suggests that in this model of cancer, Dsg3 loss does not promote or inhibit tumorigenesis.

Our observation that Dsg3 deficiency in transformed mouse keratinocytes impairs allograft tumor growth suggests that, in certain settings, Dsg3 may have oncogenic activity. We showed that in mouse keratinocytes, Dsg3 deficiency induces a defect in cell-cell adhesion, and therefore compromised adhesion in keratinocytes could account for the failure of tumors to form efficiently in the absence of Dsg3. This result is in keeping with the observation that Dsg3 knockdown can impede the growth of human head and neck cancer cell lines in xenograft assays [26]. Moreover, this observation is reminiscent of the inhibition of tumorigenesis we observed previously in Perp-deficient mice subjected to the DMBA-TPA two-step skin carcinogenesis protocol [40]. It may be that lack of cell-cell adhesion impedes survival of incipient tumor cells, thereby limiting tumor development in such instances.

Unexpectedly, there was no enhanced tumor development in Dsg3−/− mice relative to controls after chronic UVB treatment, in contrast to our previous observation that Perp deficiency in the epidermis promotes SCC development. The lack of increased SCC development in the Dsg3−/− mice may relate to the fact that Dsg3 is part of a multiprotein family and that other family members compensate for its loss. Redundancy or compensation by other family members is well-precedented, such as with the Retinoblastoma family of tumor suppressors, where multiple family members must be inactivated for mice to develop retinoblastomas [41]. Consistent with this notion, we observed that Dsg3 loss in the skin results in the upregulation of other members of the desmoglein family, particularly Dsg1. The notion that Dsg1 can compensate for Dsg3 is supported by experiments in which transgenic expression of Dsg1 in the telogen club, under the control of the K14 promoter, in Dsg3−/− mice rescues the balding phenotype characteristic of these mice [42]. Therefore, a possible explanation for the difference in cancer predisposition of mice deficient for Perp and for Dsg3 following chronic UVB treatment is that the potential consequences of Dsg3 deficiency may be compensated by induction of the other desmogleins. It would be very interesting in the future to test this notion by examining UVB-induced SCC cancer in mice deficient for multiple desmogleins to determine if compound mutants display enhanced skin cancer development. In addition, it is notable that in another model, combined oncogenic K-Ras expression and Dsc3 deletion in mouse skin accelerated skin cancer development relative to Dsc3-expressing controls, suggesting a tumor suppressor role for Dsc3 [43]. As Dsc3 and Dsg3 have similar pattern of expression in the epidermis and are thought to be partners, it may be that Dsg3 loss promotes tumorigenesis in some other context, such as upon activated Ras signaling.

Alternatively, another explanation for the lack of tumor predisposition in Dsg3−/− mice is that desmogleins function differently from Perp and do not play roles as tumor suppressors. The lack of tumor suppressor activity of Dsg3 we observed is consistent with certain previous reports about the role of DSG3 in human carcinogenesis. For example, it has been shown that DSG3 is overexpressed in SCCs of the head, neck and lung, suggesting that it may act as an oncogene [26], [27]. Interestingly, DSG3 deficiency is linked to the blistering disease Pemphigus Vulgaris, in which autoantibodies directed against DSG3 in the serum of patients attack the protein and compromise desmosomal function, leading to severe blistering of the oral mucosa. This phenotype is clearly recapitulated in Dsg3−/− mice [32], [33]. However, the fact that a clear cancer predisposition has not been noted in these patients suggests further that loss of Dsg3 is not sufficient for cancer development in stratified epithelia. Understanding if and how desmogleins and Perp act differently are important areas for future investigation.

Desmosomes have been viewed for years as static structures required primarily for strong adhesion between keratinocytes. It has become increasingly clear, however, that the function of desmosomes is more complex. An increasing number of reports link desmosome function to proliferation, apoptosis, and migration, and therefore the role of desmosomal complexes in cancer development still remains to be better understood. Future analyses will better elaborate the roles of the various desmosomal constituents in carcinogenesis in different settings.


We thank Rachel Dusek, Veronica Beaudry and Marianne Powell for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Dr. Kathleen Green and Dr. David Garrod for generously providing antibodies.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale to SB and the National Institutes of Health (Grant Number 5 R01 CA093665-10) to LDA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Green KJ, Gaudry CA (2000) Are desmosomes more than tethers for intermediate filaments? Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 1: 208–216 [PubMed]
2. Kobielak A, Fuchs E (2004) Alpha-catenin: at the junction of intercellular adhesion and actin dynamics. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 5: 614–625 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Yin T, Green KJ (2004) Regulation of desmosome assembly and adhesion. Seminars in cell & developmental biology 15: 665–677 [PubMed]
4. Chen CP, Posy S, Ben-Shaul A, Shapiro L, Honig BH (2005) Specificity of cell-cell adhesion by classical cadherins: Critical role for low-affinity dimerization through beta-strand swapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 8531–8536 [PubMed]
5. Nose A, Tsuji K, Takeichi M (1990) Localization of specificity determining sites in cadherin cell adhesion molecules. Cell 61: 147–155 [PubMed]
6. Pertz O, Bozic D, Koch AW, Fauser C, Brancaccio A, et al. (1999) A new crystal structure, Ca2+ dependence and mutational analysis reveal molecular details of E-cadherin homoassociation. The EMBO journal 18: 1738–1747 [PubMed]
7. Yap AS, Brieher WM, Gumbiner BM (1997) Molecular and functional analysis of cadherin-based adherens junctions. Annual review of cell and developmental biology 13: 119–146 [PubMed]
8. Chitaev NA, Troyanovsky SM (1997) Direct Ca2+-dependent heterophilic interaction between desmosomal cadherins, desmoglein and desmocollin, contributes to cell-cell adhesion. The Journal of cell biology 138: 193–201 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Nie Z, Merritt A, Rouhi-Parkouhi M, Tabernero L, Garrod D (2011) Membrane-impermeable cross-linking provides evidence for homophilic, isoform-specific binding of desmosomal cadherins in epithelial cells. The Journal of biological chemistry 286: 2143–2154 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Ihrie RA, Marques MR, Nguyen BT, Horner JS, Papazoglu C, et al. (2005) Perp is a p63-regulated gene essential for epithelial integrity. Cell 120: 843–856 [PubMed]
11. Berx G, Becker KF, Hofler H, van Roy F (1998) Mutations of the human E-cadherin (CDH1) gene. Human mutation 12: 226–237 [PubMed]
12. Bremnes RM, Veve R, Gabrielson E, Hirsch FR, Baron A, et al. (2002) High-throughput tissue microarray analysis used to evaluate biology and prognostic significance of the E-cadherin pathway in non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: 2417–2428 [PubMed]
13. Rakha EA, Abd El Rehim D, Pinder SE, Lewis SA, Ellis IO (2005) E-cadherin expression in invasive non-lobular carcinoma of the breast and its prognostic significance. Histopathology 46: 685–693 [PubMed]
14. Syrigos KN, Krausz T, Waxman J, Pandha H, Rowlinson-Busza G, et al. (1995) E-cadherin expression in bladder cancer using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues: correlation with histopathological grade, tumour stage and survival. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer 64: 367–370 [PubMed]
15. Wijnhoven BP, Pignatelli M, Dinjens WN, Tilanus HW (2005) Reduced p120ctn expression correlates with poor survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. Journal of surgical oncology 92: 116–123 [PubMed]
16. Zheng Z, Pan J, Chu B, Wong YC, Cheung AL, et al. (1999) Downregulation and abnormal expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: close association with advanced disease stage and lymph node metastasis. Human pathology 30: 458–466 [PubMed]
17. Perl AK, Wilgenbus P, Dahl U, Semb H, Christofori G (1998) A causal role for E-cadherin in the transition from adenoma to carcinoma. Nature 392: 190–193 [PubMed]
18. Derksen PW, Liu X, Saridin F, van der Gulden H, Zevenhoven J, et al. (2006) Somatic inactivation of E-cadherin and p53 in mice leads to metastatic lobular mammary carcinoma through induction of anoikis resistance and angiogenesis. Cancer cell 10: 437–449 [PubMed]
19. Tada H, Hatoko M, Tanaka A, Kuwahara M, Muramatsu T (2000) Expression of desmoglein I and plakoglobin in skin carcinomas. Journal of cutaneous pathology 27: 24–29 [PubMed]
20. Wong MP, Cheang M, Yorida E, Coldman A, Gilks CB, et al. (2008) Loss of desmoglein 1 expression associated with worse prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Pathology 40: 611–616 [PubMed]
21. Wang L, Liu T, Wang Y, Cao L, Nishioka M, et al. (2007) Altered expression of desmocollin 3, desmoglein 3, and beta-catenin in oral squamous cell carcinoma: correlation with lymph node metastasis and cell proliferation. Virchows Arch 451: 959–966 [PubMed]
22. Oshiro MM, Kim CJ, Wozniak RJ, Junk DJ, Munoz-Rodriguez JL, et al. (2005) Epigenetic silencing of DSC3 is a common event in human breast cancer. Breast cancer research : BCR 7: R669–680 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Brennan D, Mahoney MG (2009) Increased expression of Dsg2 in malignant skin carcinomas: A tissue-microarray based study. Cell adhesion & migration 3: 148–154 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Brennan D, Hu Y, Joubeh S, Choi YW, Whitaker-Menezes D, et al. (2007) Suprabasal Dsg2 expression in transgenic mouse skin confers a hyperproliferative and apoptosis-resistant phenotype to keratinocytes. J Cell Sci 120: 758–771 [PubMed]
25. Huang CC, Lee TJ, Chang PH, Lee YS, Chuang CC, et al. (2010) Desmoglein 3 is overexpressed in inverted papilloma and squamous cell carcinoma of sinonasal cavity. Laryngoscope 120: 26–29 [PubMed]
26. Chen YJ, Chang JT, Lee L, Wang HM, Liao CT, et al. (2007) DSG3 is overexpressed in head neck cancer and is a potential molecular target for inhibition of oncogenesis. Oncogene 26: 467–476 [PubMed]
27. Savci-Heijink CD, Kosari F, Aubry MC, Caron BL, Sun Z, et al. (2009) The role of desmoglein-3 in the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Am J Pathol 174: 1629–1637 [PubMed]
28. Mannan T, Jing S, Foroushania SH, Fortune F, Wan H (2011) RNAi-mediated inhibition of the desmosomal cadherin (desmoglein 3) impairs epithelial cell proliferation. Cell proliferation 44: 301–310 [PubMed]
29. Beaudry VG, Jiang D, Dusek RL, Park EJ, Knezevich S, et al. (2010) Loss of the p53/p63 regulated desmosomal protein Perp promotes tumorigenesis. PLoS genetics 6: e1001168. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Huen AC, Park JK, Godsel LM, Chen X, Bannon LJ, et al. (2002) Intermediate filament-membrane attachments function synergistically with actin-dependent contacts to regulate intercellular adhesive strength. The Journal of cell biology 159: 1005–1017 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. South AP, Wan H, Stone MG, Dopping-Hepenstal PJ, Purkis PE, et al. (2003) Lack of plakophilin 1 increases keratinocyte migration and reduces desmosome stability. Journal of cell science 116: 3303–3314 [PubMed]
32. Koch PJ, Mahoney MG, Ishikawa H, Pulkkinen L, Uitto J, et al. (1997) Targeted disruption of the pemphigus vulgaris antigen (desmoglein 3) gene in mice causes loss of keratinocyte cell adhesion with a phenotype similar to pemphigus vulgaris. J Cell Biol 137: 1091–1102 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Koch PJ, Mahoney MG, Cotsarelis G, Rothenberger K, Lavker RM, et al. (1998) Desmoglein 3 anchors telogen hair in the follicle. J Cell Sci 111 (Pt 17): 2529–2537 [PubMed]
34. Pierceall WE, Goldberg LH, Tainsky MA, Mukhopadhyay T, Ananthaswamy HN (1991) Ras gene mutation and amplification in human nonmelanoma skin cancers. Molecular carcinogenesis 4: 196–202 [PubMed]
35. Brash DE, Rudolph JA, Simon JA, Lin A, McKenna GJ, et al. (1991) A role for sunlight in skin cancer: UV-induced p53 mutations in squamous cell carcinoma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 88: 10124–10128 [PubMed]
36. Kanjilal S, Pierceall WE, Cummings KK, Kripke ML, Ananthaswamy HN (1993) High frequency of p53 mutations in ultraviolet radiation-induced murine skin tumors: evidence for strand bias and tumor heterogeneity. Cancer research 53: 2961–2964 [PubMed]
37. Jiang W, Ananthaswamy HN, Muller HK, Kripke ML (1999) p53 protects against skin cancer induction by UV-B radiation. Oncogene 18: 4247–4253 [PubMed]
38. Dusek RL, Getsios S, Chen F, Park JK, Amargo EV, et al. (2006) The differentiation-dependent desmosomal cadherin desmoglein 1 is a novel caspase-3 target that regulates apoptosis in keratinocytes. J Biol Chem 281: 3614–3624 [PubMed]
39. Garrod DR, Merritt AJ, Nie Z (2002) Desmosomal cadherins. Current opinion in cell biology 14: 537–545 [PubMed]
40. Marques MR, Horner JS, Ihrie RA, Bronson RT, Attardi LD (2005) Mice lacking the p53/p63 target gene Perp are resistant to papilloma development. Cancer research 65: 6551–6556 [PubMed]
41. Robanus-Maandag E, Dekker M, van der Valk M, Carrozza ML, Jeanny JC, et al. (1998) p107 is a suppressor of retinoblastoma development in pRb-deficient mice. Genes & development 12: 1599–1609 [PubMed]
42. Hanakawa Y, Matsuyoshi N, Stanley JR (2002) Expression of desmoglein 1 compensates for genetic loss of desmoglein 3 in keratinocyte adhesion. The Journal of investigative dermatology 119: 27–31 [PubMed]
43. Chen J, O’Shea C, Fitzpatrick JE, Koster MI, Koch PJ (2011) Loss of desmocollin 3 in skin tumor development and progression. Molecular carcinogenesis 51(7): 535–45 [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science