PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcmudisBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
 
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012; 13: 84.
Published online 2012 May 29. doi:  10.1186/1471-2474-13-84
PMCID: PMC3502337
Embracing additive manufacture: implications for foot and ankle orthosis design
Scott Telfer,corresponding author1 Jari Pallari,2 Javier Munguia,3 Kenny Dalgarno,3 Martin McGeough,4 and Jim Woodburn1
1School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, UK
2Peacocks Medical Group Ltd, Benfield Business Park, Newcastle, UK
3School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, Claremont Road, Newcastle, UK
4Firefly Orthoses Ltd, Markievicz Road, Sligo, Ireland
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Scott Telfer: scott.telfer/at/gcu.ac.uk; Jari Pallari: jari.pallari/at/peacocks.net; Javier Munguia: javier.munguia/at/newcastle.ac.uk; Kenny Dalgarno: kenny.dalgarno/at/newcastle.ac.uk; Martin McGeough: martinfirefly/at/gmail.com; Jim Woodburn: jim.woodburn/at/gcu.ac.uk
Received January 18, 2012; Accepted May 29, 2012.
Abstract
Background
The design of foot and ankle orthoses is currently limited by the methods used to fabricate the devices, particularly in terms of geometric freedom and potential to include innovative new features. Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, where objects are constructed via a series of sub-millimetre layers of a substrate material, may present the opportunity to overcome these limitations and allow novel devices to be produced that are highly personalised for the individual, both in terms of fit and functionality.
Two novel devices, a foot orthosis (FO) designed to include adjustable elements to relieve pressure at the metatarsal heads, and an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) designed to have adjustable stiffness levels in the sagittal plane, were developed and fabricated using AM. The devices were then tested on a healthy participant to determine if the intended biomechanical modes of action were achieved.
Results
The adjustable, pressure relieving FO was found to be able to significantly reduce pressure under the targeted metatarsal heads. The AFO was shown to have distinct effects on ankle kinematics which could be varied by adjusting the stiffness level of the device.
Conclusions
The results presented here demonstrate the potential design freedom made available by AM, and suggest that it may allow novel personalised orthotic devices to be produced which are beyond the current state of the art.
Keywords: Additive manufacture, 3D printing, Foot orthoses, Ankle-foot orthoses, Biomechanics
Articles from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central