PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjradiolSubmitSubscribeAboutBJR
 
Br J Radiol. Nov 2012; 85(1019): e1145–e1154.
PMCID: PMC3500815
Differentiation of myocardial scar from potential pitfalls and artefacts in delayed enhancement MRI
E B Turkbey, MD,1,2 M S Nacif, MD, PhD,1,3 R A Noureldin, MD,1 C T Sibley, MD,1,4 S Liu, MD,1,4 J A C Lima, MD,3 and D A Bluemke, MD, PhD1,4
1Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health/Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
2Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
3Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
4NIH Clinical Center, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, Bethesda, MD, USA
Correspondence: Dr David A Bluemke, Radiology and Imaging Sciences (RAD&IS); 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10/Room 1C355, National Institutes of Health/Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. E-mail: bluemked/at/nih.gov
Received June 1, 2011; Revised February 27, 2012; Accepted March 20, 2012.
Abstract
Delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) imaging is used increasingly to identify and quantify focal myocardial scar. Our objective is to describe factors used in the interpretation of DE-CMR images and to highlight potential pitfalls and artefacts that mimic myocardial scar. Inversion recovery gradient recalled echo sequence is commonly accepted as the standard of reference for DE-CMR. There are also alternative sequences that can be performed in a single breath-hold or with free breathing. Radiologists need to be aware of factors affecting image quality, and potential pitfalls and artefacts that may generate focal hyperintense areas that mimic myocardial scar.
Delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) imaging can identify the presence, location and extent of myocardial scar (dense myocardial fibrosis) due to ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart diseases. This technique is also called late gadolinium-enhanced MRI (LGE-MRI), myocardial delayed enhanced (MDE) MRI and delayed hyperenhanced MRI (DHE-MRI) in the literature. DE-CMR has been shown to be more sensitive than other imaging methods in detecting small subendocardial infarctions [1] and has recently been used in population-based studies to assess the presence of myocardial scar [2,3]. The technique is relatively straightforward to implement, and images can be interpreted visually for the presence of myocardial scar (hyperenhanced region) without the need for post-processing.
This article is intended to describe quality control procedures, factors affecting image quality, assessment of myocardial scar, and potential pitfalls and artefacts causing focal hyperintensities that mimic myocardial scar in delayed enhancement imaging.
DE-CMR is typically obtained using a segmented inversion recovery gradient recalled echo sequence (IR-GRE) with breath-holds, which is accepted as the standard of reference. Each slice is acquired in one breath-hold 10–20 minutes after intravenous administration of 0.1–0.2 mmol kg−1 gadolinium-based contrast agent. This sequence applies an 180° inversion pulse to null the signal of normal myocardium and enhance the signal difference between normal and scarred myocardium. The time between inversion recovery pulse and image acquisition is the “inversion time” or TI (Figure 1). The inversion time needs to be optimized for each case individually before image acquisition. With optimal settings, the normal myocardium appears nulled or “black” and myocardial scar areas appear enhanced or “bright”. The mechanism underlying delayed enhancement in the chronic disease setting is increased gadolinium concentration in expanded interstitial spaces because of replacement of non-viable myocytes with highly collagenous scar tissue (dense myocardial fibrosis) [4].
Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of inversion recovery gradient echo delayed enhancement sequence and relaxation curves of infarcted and normal myocardium. Trigger delay is the time between R-wave trigger and non-selective 180° inversion pulse. Inversion time is the time (more ...)
Delayed enhancement images are usually acquired in a stack of 10–12 short-axis slices in combination with a horizontal and a vertical long-axis image perpendicular to the short axis. Slice thickness is 6–8 mm. The gap between slices is 2–4 mm. The in-plane spatial resolution is typically 1.2–1.8 mm. The field of view is 300–380 mm and should be minimized to improve the spatial resolution while avoiding wrap-around artefact [5]. Images are typically obtained with an electrocardiogram (ECG) delay such that mid-diastolic imaging is performed. Obtaining delayed enhancement images at the same spatial location as short-axis cine images is desirable because it enables comparison between suspected scar and local wall motion. Advances in pulse sequences allow us to acquire the entire heart in a single breath-hold with inversion recovery prepared steady-state free precession (IR-SSFP) sequence or with rapid three-dimensional (3D) inversion recovery gradient recalled echo sequences. Navigator gated 3D acquisitions cover the entire heart during free breathing. All these sequences can be acquired with phase-sensitive inversion recovery reconstruction. Major characteristics of alternative pulse sequences are compared with the standard reference sequence in Table 1.
Table 1
Table 1
Major characteristics of delayed enhancement MRI sequences
The following factors should be checked before interpreting images to evaluate the diagnostic quality of images.
  • Presence of contrast in the images: If a sufficient amount of contrast material has been administered, liver and kidney in the imaging plane should be enhanced (Figure 2). All structures will appear too dark if contrast has extravasated or washed out.
    Figure 2
    Figure 2
    Normal post-contrast segmented inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo delayed enhancement image in a 38-year-old male. Increased signal intensity in liver (white arrow) and kidney (black outlined notched arrow) confirm presence of gadolinium-based contrast (more ...)
  • Inversion time adjustment: If inversion time is appropriate, normal myocardium should appear hypointense, the blood pool signal should be of intermediate intensity and myocardial scar should be the most intense structure in the image (Figure 3).
    Figure 3
    Figure 3
    Appropriate suppression of myocardial signal by inversion time adjustment in a 56-year-old male with myocardial infarction. Myocardial signal was suppressed successfully using an appropriate inversion time and myocardium was seen as hypointense in the (more ...)
The fibrous skeleton of the heart (e.g. mitral valve annulus) is often hyperintense because of gadolinium accumulation in these highly collagenous areas. Heart valves also faintly enhance (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Normal enhancement of valves and their annuli in a 54-year-old male. Four-chamber segmented inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo image shows contrast enhancement in mitral and tricuspid valves (arrowheads) and their annuli due to accumulation of contrast (more ...)
If the inversion time is slightly shorter than optimal inversion time, normal myocardium appears grey in between hypointense endo- and epicardial lines (Figure 5a).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Unsuccessful suppression of myocardial signal due to suboptimal inversion time adjustment in a 45-year-old male with a history of myocardial infarction. Segmented inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo magnitude image (a) in the short-axis plane demonstrates (more ...)
If very long inversion time is used, the image contrast is reduced. Images acquired with suboptimal inversion time may lead to inaccurate assessment of scar size [6]. An IR-SSFP look-locker sequence is used to select the optimal inversion time visually for maximising the signal intensity between normal and scarred myocardium [7] (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Selection of optimal inversion time in a patient with a history of myocardial infarction. One short-axis slice of the left ventricle at the level of inferior papillary muscle insertion point is repeatedly obtained using different inversion times varying (more ...)
Since each slice can be obtained in one breath-hold with the IR-GRE sequence, the TI time should be slightly lengthened as the delay after contrast increases. Another way to achieve a consistent contrast over a wide range of inversion times is to apply phase-sensitive reconstruction. This method uses phase information to correct magnitude images when TI times are incorrectly determined [8] (Figure 5a,b). The phase-sensitive reconstruction method also reduces the variation in apparent infarct size. In patients with breath-holding difficulty, DE-CMR can be performed using a nominal inversion time value in combination with IR-SSFP sequence which will obviate the need for extra breath-hold for the look-locker sequence to optimise inversion time. A disadvantage of phase-sensitive inversion recovery images is that noise may be more prominent in the image.
We interpret a hyperintense region as definite when it is confirmed either in two adjacent short-axis images or in one short-axis image and a long-axis image at a corresponding location. Confirmation of scar in two different images avoids misinterpretation of artefacts or image features that may be due to motion artefacts, morphological variations or septal clefts. However, very small focal myocardial scar areas might be missed since slice thickness is 6–8 mm.
Myocardial scar size in DE-CMR can be quantified by automated or manual segmentation methods. These methods are reader dependent for delineation of endocardium and epicardium to calculate left ventricular (LV) mass and the scar size as a percentage of LV mass. For calculation of myocardial scar size, hyperenhanced areas are delineated by a reader using the manual segmentation method, which is observer dependent and time-consuming. Automated segmentation methods use either a threshold of signal intensity from 2 to 6 standard deviations above the remote myocardium or a threshold of full-width at half-maximum to calculate infarct size.
Alternatively, visual scoring is a fast and semi-quantitative method to detect infarct size based on 17 segments of the American Heart Association heart model, which can be used in daily clinical practice. In this method, a visual score ranging from 0 to 4 was attributed to each of the 17 segments according to the transmural extent of the hyperenhancement (0, no hyperenhancement; 1, 1–25%; 2, 26–50%; 3, 51–75%; and 4, 75–100% transmurality). All scores are summed and divided by the maximal possible score (17×4=68) and then multiplied by 100 to express global infarct size as a percentage [9].
Differentiation of subendocardial infarct from blood pool
The hyperintense blood between myocardium and papillary muscles can mimic myocardial scar (Figure 7).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Subendocardial pseudoinfarct appearance due to blood in 41-year-old male. Short-axis segmented inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo image at the base of the left ventricle (a) shows a suspicious hyperintense area (arrow) for myocardial scar. However, (more ...)
Distinguishing small subendocardial myocardial infarctions from blood pool can also be difficult since both are hyperintense in the image. As an aid, myocardial thickness and morphology can be compared with cine MRI to help determine whether the enhancement occurs in the myocardium or in the LV cavity (Figure 8).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Subendocardial myocardial infarction in a 56-year-old female without a history of heart attack. Short-axis segmented inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo image at the mid-ventricular level (a) shows a hyperintense area reflecting subendocardial myocardial (more ...)
Epicardial and pericardial fat mimicking scar
Epi- and pericardial fat often show high signal intensity using the inversion recovery technique. This can mimic epicardial hyperenhancement (Figure 9). Checking the continuity of myocardial scar area in adjacent slices and in other imaging planes is helpful to identify epicardial fat.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Epicardial fat mimicking myocardial scar in a 41-year-old female. Short-axis segmented inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo image at the mid-ventricular level (a) shows a pericardial hyperintense area suspicious for myocardial scar (arrow). The hyperintense (more ...)
Partial volume effects
Partial volume effects typically cause problems near the aortic outflow tract (Figure 10a–c) and epicardial locations due to right ventricular septomarginal trabeculation, as well as the right ventricular insertion site near the apex (Figure 11a–c). Myocardial hyperenhancement is considered to represent myocardial scar if it can be seen continuously in two consecutive slices (Figure 11d–g).
Figure 10
Figure 10
(a–c) Pseudoinfarct appearance due to partial volume effect of aortic outflow tract in a 60-year-old male. Short-axis segmented inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo image at the basal level of the left ventricle (b) shows a hyperintense area (more ...)
Figure 11
Figure 11
(a–c) Pseudoenhancement at the inferior right ventricular insertion point in a 54-year-old male with normal myocardium. Short-axis segmented inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo image with phase-sensitive reconstruction shows hyperintensity (more ...)
Myocardial cleft
Myocardial clefts present as a discrete pouch of blood signal penetrating more than half the thickness of the myocardial wall in the basal inferior wall of the left ventricle or the mid- to apical segments of the interventricular septum. They typically narrow or occlude during systole [10]. The blood inside the cleft can simulate myocardial scar in delayed enhancement images. Differentiation can be accomplished by evaluating the pouch and wall morphology on cine MRI (Figure 12).
Figure 12
Figure 12
(a,b) Myocardial cleft in a 50-year-old male without history of myocardial infarction. Four-chamber delayed enhancement image (a) demonstrates a hyperintense area in the septum that is suspicious for myocardial scar (arrow). However, the corresponding (more ...)
Myocardial clefts also need to be differentiated from non-compacted myocardium that is characterized by the diastolic ratio of non-compacted to compact layers of myocardium >2.3 at diastole [11].
Septal perforator branch of the left anterior descending artery
The left anterior descending artery gives rise to a variable number of septal perforator branches. Approximately 15% of subjects have a large first septal perforator branch, which may mimic linear hyperenhancement in a short-axis delayed enhancement image at the base of the heart (Figure 13).
Figure 13
Figure 13
A pseudoenhancement due to septal perforator artery in a 50-year-old normal male. Short-axis segmented inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo image at the basal level (a) demonstrates linear mid-wall delayed enhancement in a location consistent with (more ...)
Ghosting artefacts
Periodic respiratory, cardiac and stomach motion lead to ghosting artefacts and blurring which may obscure or simulate lesions (Figure 14) [12].
Figure 14
Figure 14
Ghosting artefacts in a 46-year-old male. In the segmented inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo short-axis image at the mid-ventricular level (a), diaphragmatic motion leads to replicated diaphragmatic contours (white arrows) and blurring which interferes (more ...)
Stomach motion artefacts simulate myocardial scar in one short axis slice, especially on the right ventricular insertion point. They reproduce the size and shape of the stomach along the phase encoding direction. This finding is the important clue to differentiate artefact from myocardial scar (Figure 15).
Figure 15
Figure 15
Ghosting artefact due to stomach motion in a 47-year-old female. Short-axis segmented inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo image at the mid-ventricular level shows ghosting artefact from stomach motion (thick arrows) that projects over the inferior (more ...)
Cardiac amyloidosis
In cardiac amyloidosis, the accumulation of amyloid proteins in interstitial space increases contrast accumulation diffusely. Thus, detection of the optimal inversion time to suppress the normal myocardial signal is typically difficult. A pronounced subendocardial, global or diffuse increase in signal intensity, which does not match any coronary artery territory, is the characteristic enhancement pattern for cardiac amyloidosis [13] (Figure 16).
Figure 16
Figure 16
Subendocardial diffuse and global hyperenhancement due to cardiac amyloidosis. Inversion recovery delayed enhancement image with phase-sensitive reconstruction in the short-axis (a), and long-axis (b) planes demonstrates subendocardial, global and diffuse (more ...)
DE-CMR represents an emerging standard for identification and quantification of myocardial scar/fibrosis. The IR-GRE sequence is commonly accepted as the standard of reference. There are alternative sequences that can be performed in a single breath-hold or with free breathing in patients with breath-holding difficulty. Radiologists need to be aware of potential pitfalls and artefacts that can be seen as hyperintense areas in delayed enhancement images and may otherwise mimic myocardial scar. It is important to confirm the presence of a hyperintense area in more than one slice (two adjacent short-axis slices or one short-axis and one long-axis image at a corresponding location) and to assess the corresponding cine images when interpreting DE-CMR of myocardial scar. These cross-checks reduce the opportunity for misinterpretation; however, despite these improvements, current DE-CMR resolution is still a limitation in the detection of very small myocardial scars.
1. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, Elliott MD, Regenfus M, Parker M, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003;361:374–9. [PubMed]
2. Barbier CE, Bjerner T, Johansson L, Lind L, Ahlstrom H. Myocardial scars more frequent than expected: magnetic resonance imaging detects potential risk group. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:765–71. [PubMed]
3. Meijs MF, Bots ML, Cramer MJ, Vonken EJ, Velthuis BK, van derGraaf Y, et al. Unrecognised myocardial infarction in subjects at high vascular risk: prevalence and determinants. Heart 2009;95:728–32. [PubMed]
4. Rehwald WG, Fieno DS, Chen EL, Kim RJ, Judd RM. Myocardial magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent concentrations after reversible and irreversible ischemic injury. Circulation 2002;105:224–9. [PubMed]
5. Kim RJ, Shah DJ, Judd RM. How we perform delayed enhancement imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003;5:505–14. [PubMed]
6. Setser RM, Chung YC, Weaver JA, Stillman AE, Simonetti OP, White RD. Effect of inversion time on delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging with and without phase-sensitive reconstruction. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:650–5. [PubMed]
7. Vogel-Claussen J, Rochitte CE, Wu KC, Kamel IR, Foo TK, Lima JA, et al. Delayed enhancement MR imaging: utility in myocardial assessment. Radiographics 2006;26:795–810. [PubMed]
8. Kellman P, Arai AE, McVeigh ER, Aletras AH. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:372–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Mewton N, Revel D, Bonnefoy E, Ovize M, Croisille P. Comparison of visual scoring and quantitative planimetry methods for estimation of global infarct size on delayed enhanced cardiac MRI and validation with myocardial enzymes. Eur J Radiol 2011;78:87–92. [PubMed]
10. Afonso L, Kottam A, Khetarpal V. Myocardial cleft, crypt, diverticulum, or aneurysm? Does it really matter? Clin Cardiol 2009;32:E48–51. [PubMed]
11. Petersen SE, Selvanayagam JB, Wiesmann F, Robson MD, Francis JM, Anderson RH, et al. Left ventricular non-compaction: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:101–5. [PubMed]
12. Mirowitz SA. MR imaging artifacts. Challenges and solutions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1999;7:717–32. [PubMed]
13. Seeger A, Klumpp B, Kramer U, Stauder NI, Fenchel M, Claussen CD, et al. MRI assessment of cardiac amyloidosis: experience of six cases with review of the current literature. Br J Radiol 2009;82:337–42. [PubMed]
14. Huber A, Schoenberg SO, Spannagl B, Rieber J, Erhard I, Klauss V, et al. Single-shot inversion recovery TrueFISP for assessment of myocardial infarction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:627–33. [PubMed]
15. Li W, Li BS, Polzin JA, Mai VM, Prasad PV, Edelman RR. Myocardial delayed enhancement imaging using inversion recovery single-shot steady-state free precession: initial experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:327–30. [PubMed]
16. Huber A, Hayes C, Spannagl B, Rieber J, Klauss V, Schoenberg SO, et al. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery single-shot balanced steady-state free precession for detection of myocardial infarction during a single breathhold. Acad Radiol 2007;14:1500–8. [PubMed]
17. Amano Y, Matsumura Y, Kumita S. Free-breathing high-spatial-resolution delayed contrast-enhanced three-dimensional viability MR imaging of the myocardium at 3.0 T: a feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:1361–7. [PubMed]
18. Kino A, Zuehlsdorff S, Sheehan JJ, Weale PJ, Carroll TJ, Jerecic R, et al. Three-dimensional phase-sensitive inversion-recovery turbo FLASH sequence for the evaluation of left ventricular myocardial scar. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:W381–8. [PubMed]
19. Bauner KU, Muehling O, Theisen D, Hayes C, Wintersperger BJ, Reiser MF, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with 3D MRI at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1645–50. [PubMed]
20. Peukert D, Laule M, Taupitz M, Kaufels N, Hamm B, Dewey M. 3D and 2D delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging for detection of myocardial infarction: preclinical and clinical results. Acad Radiol 2007;14:788–94. [PubMed]
Articles from The British Journal of Radiology are provided here courtesy of
British Institute of Radiology