PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcphBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Public Health
 
BMC Public Health. 2012; 12: 735.
Published online Sep 3, 2012. doi:  10.1186/1471-2458-12-735
PMCID: PMC3490822
Short and long-term effectiveness of couple counselling: a study protocol
Margot J Schofield,corresponding author1 Nicholas Mumford,1 Dubravko Jurkovic,1 Ivancica Jurkovic,1 and Andrew Bickerdike2
1School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia
2Relationships Australia Victoria, 450 Burke Road, Camberwell, VIC, 3124, Australia
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Margot J Schofield: m.schofield/at/latrobe.edu.au; Nicholas Mumford: n.mumford/at/latrobe.edu.au; Dubravko Jurkovic: jurkovic7/at/yahoo.com.au; Ivancica Jurkovic: ijurkovic2001/at/yahoo.com.au; Andrew Bickerdike: abickerdike/at/rav.org.au
Received August 23, 2012; Accepted August 24, 2012.
Abstract
Background
Healthy couple relationships are fundamental to a healthy society, whereas relationship breakdown and discord are linked to a wide range of negative health and wellbeing outcomes. Two types of relationship services (couple counselling and relationship education) have demonstrated efficacy in many controlled studies but evidence of the effectiveness of community-based relationship services has lagged behind. This study protocol describes an effectiveness evaluation of the two types of community-based relationship services. The aims of the Evaluation of Couple Counselling study are to: map the profiles of clients seeking agency-based couple counselling and relationship enhancement programs in terms of socio-demographic, relationship, health, and health service use indicators; to determine 3 and 12-month outcomes for relationship satisfaction, commitment, and depression; and determine relative contributions of client and therapy factors to outcomes.
Methods/Design
A quasi-experimental pre-post-post evaluation design is used to assess outcomes for couples presenting for the two types of community-based relationship services. The longitudinal design involves a pre-treatment survey and two follow-up surveys at 3- and 12-months post-intervention. The study is set in eight Relationships Australia Victoria centres, across metropolitan, outer suburbs, and regional/rural sites. Relationships Australia, a non-government organisation, is the largest provider of couple counselling and relationship services in Australia. The key outcomes are couple satisfaction, relationship commitment, and depression measured by the CESD-10. Multi-level modelling will be used to account for the dyadic nature of couple data.
Discussion
The study protocol describes the first large scale investigation of the effectiveness of two types of relationship services to be conducted in Australia. Its significance lies in providing more detailed profiles of couples who seek relationship services, in evaluating both 3 and 12-month relationship and health outcomes, and in determining factors that best predict improvements. It builds on prior research by using a naturalistic sample, an effectiveness research design, a more robust measure of relationship satisfaction, robust health indicators, a 12-month follow-up period, and a more rigorous statistical procedure suitable for dyadic data. Findings will provide a more precise description of those seeking relationship services and factors associated with improved relationship and health outcomes.
Keywords: Couple counselling, Relationship education, Marital satisfaction, Relationship commitment, Depression, Effectiveness, Health outcomes, Community services
Articles from BMC Public Health are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central