PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Ann N Y Acad Sci. Author manuscript; available in PMC Nov 5, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3489013
NIHMSID: NIHMS235346
Impact of Mendelian Inheritance in Cardiovascular Disease
Kim L. McBride1,2* and Vidu Garg1,3*
1 Departments of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Ohio 43205
2 Center for Molecular and Human Genetics, Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Ohio 43205
3 The Heart Center and Center for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital Columbus, Ohio 43205
*Corresponding authors: Vidu Garg, M.D., The Heart Center and Center for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, 700 Children’s Drive W302, Columbus, Ohio 43205. Phone: 614-355-3091, Fax: 614-722-4881, vidu.garg/at/nationwidechildrens.org. Kim L. McBride, M.D., Center for Molecular and Human Genetics, Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, 700 Children’s Drive W410, Columbus, Ohio 43205. Phone: 614-722-2848, Fax: 614-722-2817, kim.mcbride/at/nationwidechildrens.org
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. While the etiology for the majority of cardiovascular disease is presumed to be a combination of genetic and environmental factors, developments in our understanding of the basic biology of cardiac disorders have been greatly advanced through discoveries made studying heart diseases that exhibit Mendelian forms of inheritance. Most of these diseases primarily affect children and young adults and include cardiomyopathies, arrhythmias, aortic aneurysms and congenital heart defects. The discovery of the genetic etiologies for these diseases have had significant impact on our understanding of more complex forms of cardiovascular disease and in some cases led to novel diagnostic and treatment modalities. In this review, we will summarize these seminal genetic discoveries, highlighting a few that have resulted in significant impact on human disease, and discuss the potential utility of studying Mendelian-inherited heart disease with the development of new genetic technologies and our increased understanding of the human genome.
Diseases of the cardiovascular system are a leading cause of death in both children1 and adults.2 Adult onset cardiovascular disease – hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, valvar disease – remain significant health problems and leading causes of death in developed countries,2 and the prevalence is increasing in developing countries.3 Inherited cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias are among the most common human genetic disorders. In addition, congenital malformations of the heart and great vessels are the most common cause type of birth defect and are the leading cause of death in infants less than one year of age, despite recent advancements in medical and surgical therapy.4 Improved treatments have led to a greater number of adult survivors, such that there are now more adults than children with a congenital cardiovascular malformation (CVM).5 Survivors of these defects encounter significant life-long morbidity, and frequently have a shortened lifespan.6 These cardiovascular diseases that affect children and young adults have a strong genetic contribution and accordingly attracted interest from researchers to identify disease-causing genes.
A significant amount of effort has been spent on identifying the genetic contributors to cardiovascular disease. A number of genome-wide association studies for complex genetic diseases that affect adults such as stroke, hypertension, and atherosclerosis have been performed, with limited success in identifying the underlying genetic susceptibility.7 In contrast, many classes of cardiovascular disease that affect children and young adults that are due to single gene disorders (cardiomyopathies, arrhythmias) are now well worked out, while those occupying a continuum from single gene through oligogenic to complex genetic etiologies (CVMs, aortopathies) are just now being elucidated. With the knowledge of individual causative genes for these disorders exhibiting Mendelian inheritance, much insight has been gained in disease pathophysiology and resulted in novel treatments.
In this review, we will demonstrate the importance of single gene defects in cardiovascular disease, focusing on cardiomyopathies, aortopathies, arrhythmias, and CVMs. Recent advances in clinical diagnostic testing and novel therapies will be highlighted. While cardiovascular diseases in both children and adults have a strong genetic contribution, our review will focus primarily on diseases first presenting in children and young adults where the majority of significant genetic discoveries have occurred.
In this section, we have focused on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), as major advances in understanding the genetic basis of these diseases have been made and have impacted clinical care.
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Familial HCM is defined as left ventricular thickening, which occurs in the absence of a syndrome or other cardiovascular conditions that increase afterload (i.e. aortic stenosis or hypertension), and possess the characteristic histology of myocyte disarray.8 Manifestations include dyspnea, chest pain, syncope, palpitations or sudden death. Symptoms may present from infancy to old age but are most apparent in adolescence. HCM is among the most common genetic disorders, with a prevalence of 1/500.9 It remains the most frequent cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young competitive athletes in the US, accounting for 1/3.10
While first described as a clinical entity in the 1950’s,11 the familial nature of the disease was not elucidated until the 1980’s. This was confirmed in 1990 with the description of the first gene implicated in HCM, MYH7.12 Over 20 genes have now been characterized as causing familial HCM (Table IA), and in the process demonstrated that HCM is a disease of the sarcomere.13 Four of these genes, MYH7, MYBPC3, TNNT2 and TNNI3, account for roughly 80% of all HCM for which a specific gene mutation can be identified.14 Over 900 different mutations have been found, with many mutations unique to individual families. The most common mutation, MYBPC3 p.Arg502Trp, occurs in only 2.4% of individuals of European ancestry with HCM.15
Table I
Table I
Disease Genes for Cardiomyopathy
With this increased knowledge of the genetics of HCM, it was thought that genotype-phenotype correlations could be identified. What was discovered was wide variability in presentation between families with the same mutation and even within a family with the same mutation.16 Only a few specific genotype-phenotype correlations exist, and only broad generalizations can be made. MYBPC3 mutations tend to result in a later onset of symptoms.17 Mutations in MYH7 tend to have a somewhat earlier age of onset, and the p.Arg403Gln and p.Arg453Cys mutations appear to confer more severe disease.18 However, these mutations have proven to be very rare (<1%) among those with HCM.19 TNNT2 mutations cause less hypertrophy, but impart a higher risk of sudden cardiac death.2022 Presence of a mutation in any of the known genes that cause HCM is associated with more severe disease compared to those with HCM in whom a mutation is not identified.23 Inheritance of mutations in two or more different genes known to cause HCM has been seen in a number of cases, and results in an earlier onset and more severe disease.14, 2427
Clinical gene testing for HCM has been available for over 5 years. Despite a reasonable rate of mutation identification (40% for isolated to 70% for familial cases), testing has not entered routine clinical practice. Many reasons exist for this, including high cost and limited utility for the individual patient as testing will have little impact on the prognosis or treatment. Most patients and their families are interested in testing once genetic counseling is provided.28 The greatest benefit exists for relatives of the patient, as once the mutation in the family is identified, clinically unaffected at-risk relatives may be tested and those without the mutation may safely discontinue recommended clinical screening. While identification of a mutation in an unaffected individual may have negative psychological consequences, studies have demonstrated that the majority of individuals identified as carriers of disease-causing mutations positively value genetic counseling and predictive testing. 29, 30
Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a much more clinically heterogeneous disorder. Individuals with DCM present with symptoms of heart failure, arrhythmias or conduction disturbance, and thromboembolic disease (from an intracardiac thrombus). DCM is defined by left ventricular enlargement and evidence of systolic dysfunction.31 A wide variety of acquired causes are known for DCM, including ischemic heart disease, valve disease, congenital heart disease, toxins, chemotherapy, infectious myocarditis, radiation and many others.32 Additionally, many specific genetic diseases present with DCM as a component of their manifestations, including muscular dystrophies and inborn errors of metabolism (IEM), making idiopathic DCM a diagnosis of exclusion. The incidence of idiopathic DCM for children is estimated at 0.57/100,000 while in adults it is 1/2500.33, 34 Most experts believe this is an underestimate as individuals with DCM may be asymptomatic for a prolonged time before heart failure becomes evident.
Familial DCM is defined as the occurrence of idiopathic DCM in two or more close relatives. Scattered case reports and small studies in the 1980’s suggested DCM was a familial disease in only a small percentage of cases.35 Full recognition that DCM could be a familial disease did not occur until a prospective echocardiography study on relatives of individuals with DCM in 1992,36 which reported familial DCM in 20% of cases. It is now estimated that from 30–48% of individuals with DCM have an affected relative.3739 This genetic knowledge has sparked investigation of seemingly sporadic DCM. Two recent studies demonstrated that half of pregnancy or peripartum DCM cases have a family history of DCM, and mutations can be identified in 5%.40, 41
In contrast to HCM, the genetic etiology of DCM is varied and involves many structures or functions of the cardiomyocyte, that when perturbed, results in a loss of contractile force generation or transmission.42 Most genes implicated in familial DCM encode for cytoskeletal (dystrophin-sarcoglycan complex) or sarcomere proteins, but also include ion channels and transcription factors. Over 40 loci and more than 25 genes have been described (Table IB), many of which are implicated in syndromic forms of DCM or also cause HCM. It is likely that many more genes may be involved in DCM, as the currently known genes account for <40% of familial DCM.
The most commonly involved genes in DCM are LMNA, MYH7, and TNNT2 which account for 5%, 4%, and 3% of all familial DCM, respectively, while other implicated genes are found in <1%.43, 44 Combined, mutations in sarcomere genes account for up to 10% of mutations in DCM.45
Unlike HCM, the role for genetic testing in DCM is limited due to the extensive genetic heterogeneity and low yield (currently 20%). The yield increases in families with DCM and conduction defects, where mutations in LMNA may be found in 40%.44, 46
Other cardiomyopathies
Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) accounts for ~10% of all cardiomyopathies, and is characterized by spongy myocardial appearance with increased trabeculations.47 Arrythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) consists of fibrofatty infiltration and dilation of the right ventricle.48 Multiple disease loci and genes have been identified for LVNC and ARVC/D (Table IC). Many inherited disorders have secondary hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy, including specific syndromes (Noonan and other Ras pathway syndromes), mitochondrial disorders,49 IEM,50 and muscular dystrophies51 and are beyond the scope of this review.
Novel technologies for clinical cardiomyopathy testing
Traditionally, gene testing is performed using Sanger sequencing technology. Analyzing multiple genes can quickly result in expensive test panels. Novel sequencing technologies have been used to lower cost, improve turnaround time, and perform more comprehensive testing by including more genes in the test panel. Oligonucleotide hybridization based resequencing DNA microarrays use 25 bp oligonucleotides that vary at a single central position.52 Four probes (A, C, G, and T) are constructed for each basepair in the gene. Fluorescently labeled patient DNA is added to the array, and the dye of maximal intensity identifies the base at the position interrogated. Resequencing arrays are easily scalable and amenable to quickly adding new genes to the test panel. They are currently used for HCM53, 54 and DCM55 in clinical testing.
Next generation sequencing has just entered the clinical realm.56 Various strategies have been devised to reduce the cost by sequencing specific targets through capture by microarray57, 58 or fluid methods,59 rather than the whole genome. “Bait” sequence is used to capture the “target” region of interest in the patient’s DNA, which may then be sequenced on a variety of platforms. Clinical testing using this method is already available for HCM and DCM.
The thoracic aorta is a complex structure with elastic and contractile properties that allow it to receive blood, transmit the pulse wave, and reduce workload of the ventricle. Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) occur due to a weakening of the arterial wall, and predispose to dissection. TAAs, particularly of the ascending aorta, represent an entity distinct from abdominal aortic aneurysms.60 The incidence of TAA is 3.5/100,000 with rates increasing with advancing age, but frequent misdiagnosis suggests this is an underestimate.61 TAAs may be sporadic, familial or syndromic.
Marfan Syndrome
Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a well-known multisystem connective tissue disorder with a defining feature of aortic root enlargement at the sinuses of Valsalva that progresses to aortic dissection by 20–40 years of age.62 MFS accounts for only 5% of all TAAs. It is still diagnosed clinically using family history and the clinical features (Ghent criteria) to identify major involvement of at least two systems (skeletal, ophthalmologic, cardiovascular, dura) and involvement of a third (the preceding and pulmonary, dermatologic).63 Three groups converged on FBN1 as the causative gene in 1991.6466 Individuals meeting Ghent criteria will have a mutation in FBN1 in 70–93% of cases.67 Some genotype-phenotype correlation exists, as missense mutations eliminating or producing a cysteine are more likely to cause ectopic lentis, and mutations in exons 24–32 have a more severe phenotype, including neonatal MFS.68 Originally thought to be a structural disorder, recent work has elegantly shown that the primary pathophysiology is due to alterations in TGFB signaling.69 Loss of fibrillin-1 sequestration of TGFB in the extracellular matrix leads to an increase in active TGFB signaling that results in aortic root dilation, lung bullae formation and impaired muscle regeneration.
Loeys-Dietz Syndrome
Following the identification of FBN1 as the causative gene for MFS, there were observations of individuals with a clinical overlap but without FBN1 mutations. Several of these families were investigated by linkage analysis, and mutations in TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 were found.70 Individuals with Loeys-Dietz syndrome have aortopathy (arterial tortuosity, aneurysms and dissections), skeletal abnormalities (pectus deformities, arachnodactyly, talipes equinovarus), translucent skin, and craniofacial abnormalities (bifid uvula, ocular hypertelorism). Compared to MFS, aneurysms may occur in any medium-sized artery, and the arterial disease is much more aggressive with earlier dissection and age of death.71 Mutations in either gene cause a similar phenotype.
Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes
The Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are a collection of connective tissue disorders characterized by variably severe joint hypermobility and increased skin elasticity.72 With the exception of the kyphoscoliotic type, all are autosomal dominant in inheritance. EDS, vascular type (formerly EDS IV), is caused by mutations in COL3A1. It is characterized by joint hypermobility, increased skin translucency, and rupture of medium sized arteries, bowel and uterus. Although thoracic aortic aneurysms may occur, it is not the most common vessel involved. EDS, kyphoscoliotic form (formerly type VI), is due to mutations in PLOD1. It also may have arterial dissection of the medium-sized vessels or aorta. It is distinguished by severe neonatal hypotonia, early and progressive scoliosis, and rupture of the globe. EDS, classic type (types I and II) are due to mutations in COL5A1 or COL5A2, and EDS, hypermobility type (type III or benign familial hypermobility) is likely genetically heterogeneous. Echocardiography observations indicate mild aortic root dilation may be present in up to 1/3 of individuals with the classic or hypermobility types.73, 74 In the absence of severe dilation, there does not appear to be a significant risk of aortic dissection; however there are currently no clinical guidelines on long-term management. Longitudinal studies are required to determine if the observed mild dilation is progressive.
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm
The genetic contribution to non-syndromic TAA has only recently been defined. The first familial case of non-syndromic TAA was described 25 years ago,75 but not until the late 1990’s was the inheritance and segregation studied in detail.7678 Family studies indicate roughly 20% of individuals with a TAA have a similarly affected relative, and in those families, individuals with TAA presented at an earlier age. 77, 79 TAA families also have higher rates of aneurysms anywhere in the arterial tree. Aortic dilation is common among individuals with a BAV,80, 81 with multiple reports now demonstrating co-segregation of TAA and BAV in families.82 Families with TAA may be divided into two phenotypic groups by location, using the ligamentum arteriosum. TAA above the ligamentum is highly familial and not associated with atherosclerosis, while TAA below is associated with atherosclerosis.60 This likely reflects the embryonic origin of the smooth muscle cells in the aorta, as cardiac neural crest cells only contribute to the aortic arch above the ligamentum arteriosum.83
To date, a total of seven loci have been described and 4 genes identified for familial TAA (Table II).8487 The 4 identified genes appear to explain roughly 20% of all familial TAA. In addition, families with BAV and aortic dilation or thoracic aortic aneurysm segregating with NOTCH1 mutations have been identified.88 Little genotype-phenotype correlation exists, but individuals with mutations in ACTA2 may also be predisposed to stroke and exhibit moya-moya phenomenon on cerebral angiography.89
Table II
Table II
Disease Genes for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms (TAA)
Novel therapies for thoracic aortic aneurysm
Much excitement has been generated by the demonstration of nearly complete cessation of aortic root dilation in a mouse model of MFS with the use of losartan.90 Losartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), but as demonstrated in the mouse model, it also acts to suppress TGFB signaling. Preliminary results on the use of losartan in patients with MFS appear promising. A small group of pediatric patients who were switched to losartan after treatment failure with beta-blockers demonstrated significant slowing of aortic root growth.91 Several trials are in progress comparing standard beta-blocker therapy to losartan in the US and Europe.9294 The role ARBs might play in other syndromic, familial or sporadic TAA is unknown, as is the role of the TGFB pathway in these other diseases. The greatest promise may exist for LDS, which is also due to TGFB pathway dysregulation.
Diseases of the cardiac conduction system are very prevalent in the world and affect an estimated millions of individuals in the United States alone.95 The majority of these diseases are associated with adult cardiovascular disease, but the elucidation of the genetic causes of inherited arrhythmias, including long QT syndrome (LQTS), Brugada syndrome, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) which exhibit Mendelian inheritance patterns, have resulted in an increased understanding of conduction system disease. While conduction system disease encompasses a spectrum of arrhythmias, those of ventricular origin have a propensity to be lethal and present in sudden cardiac death (SCD). Here, we highlight the discovery of the genetic etiologies of LQTS, Brugada syndrome and CVPT and how these findings have affected clinical management and care.
Long QT syndrome
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is an inherited cardiac disease, which presents with syncope and SCD, due to the ventricular tachyarrythmias (VT), torsade de pointes. It is characterized by prolongation of the QT interval on electrocardiogram. The diagnosis is made using clinical criteria96 and the disease has an estimated prevalence of 1 in 2000–5000 individuals.97, 98 Four clinical subtypes of LQTS have been defined and include the more common Romano-Ward syndrome,99, 100 Jervell-Nielsen syndrome (with congenital deafness),101 Anderson syndrome (with periodic paralysis and malformations)102, 103 and Timothy syndrome (with cardiac and other birth defects, autism).104
The etiology for LQTS had remained unknown until 1995, when two simultaneous publications identified mutations in HERG (LQTS1) and SCN5A (LQTS3) through linkage analysis of large kindreds.105, 106 These discoveries led to the concept of ion channelopathies as the cause of inherited arrhythmias. Since then, 12 LQTS subtypes have been identified (Table IIIA), with the first three subtypes comprising the majority of clinical cases. 107, 108 For these three most common subtypes (LQTS1, LQTS2, and LQTS3), numerous features that tend to occur with each subtype have been identified. Each subtype has unique triggers: exercise for LQTS1, startling due to noises for LQTS2, and episodes of bradycardia (i.e. sleep) for LQTS3.109 In addition, each of these 3 subtypes has distinct electrocardiographic findings when examining T wave morphology and are often used to direct genetic testing.110 The subtypes also have variable responses in regards to drug therapy, as LQTS1 is more responsive to beta-blocker therapy when compared to LQTS3 where mexiletene (a sodium channel blocker) is often used, and have different prognostic implications with LQTS3 being highly lethal as compared to LQTS1.111 This increased knowledge has led to the use of commercially available genetic testing, and allowed for screening of family members and improved clinical management. Although much knowledge has been gained, clear genotype-phenotype associations regarding SCD risk prediction and treatment efficacy remain elusive.
Table III
Table III
Disease Genes for Cardiac Conduction System Diseases
Brugada syndrome
With the discovery of ion channel mutations as a cause of VT, investigators began investigating other familial cases of idiopathic VT. The best described of these is Brugada syndrome which is characterized by ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads (V1–V3) on electrocardiogram and an increased risk of SCD due to polymorphic VT.112, 113 The disease was known to have an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance with incomplete penetrance, but the genetic cause was unclear until 1998. Using a candidate gene approach and studying several well-phenotyped small families with autosomal dominant disease, investigators identified mutations in SCN5A as the cause of Brugada syndrome.114 Since then additional molecular genetic studies have identified 7 molecular subtypes of Brugada syndrome but SCN5A mutations account for the majority of cases (Table IIIB).115 Similar to LQTS, these discoveries have resulted in commercially available genetic testing and improved genetic counseling but novel therapeutics and treatments are still under development.
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is a relatively rare but important cause of SCD in young children.116 The disease, which is characterized by adrenergically mediated VT has been described for over three decades.117 Individuals typically develop symptoms of syncope, VT, SCD with exercise and suffer from significant mortality prior to 40 years of age.118 It is a genetically inherited condition and presents in both an autosomal dominant and recessive condition (Table IIIC). The autosomal dominant form was mapped to a region on chromosome 1q42-43119 and subsequently mutations in the human cardiac ryanodine receptor (RYR2) were identified as the genetic etiology.120, 121 The autosomal recessive form had been mapped to a region on chromosome 1p13-p21 and the identification of Ryr2 as the cause of the autosomal dominant form allowed investigators to focus on other genes critical for calcium handling on the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Calsequestrin 2 (CASQ2) was located in this 8Mb interval and mutations in this gene were found to segregate with the disease in families. These genetic discoveries led to a greater understanding of the biochemical effects of the mutations to cause sarcoplasmic reticulum leak of calcium122, 123 and the development of mouse models for CVPT.124, 125 These molecular insights and investigations have allowed for the recent discovery that flecainide, an FDA-approved antiarrhythmic drug, was efficacious in suppressing VT in mouse models of CVPT and humans with CVPT.126 Larger clinical trials are currently being planned to determine if this is a novel therapy for this highly lethal disease.
These seminal discoveries have increased our understanding of SCD and opened a field of channelopathies. While these genetic discoveries have impacted patient care, a significant amount of research still needs to be done. For example, mutations in SC5NA cause both LQTS and Brugada syndrome and the reason for the phenotypic differences remain unclear. Of note, these discoveries have allowed us to expand into conduction system disease not related to familial cases of SCD. For example, genetic polymorphisms in the LQTS genes likely result in drug-induced long QT127 and a nucleotide variation in SC5NA results in increased arrhythmias in African American population.128 These genetic discoveries have also assisted in the identification of the cause of SCD as approximately 25–35% of sudden unexplained deaths in children and young adults have no autopsy findings. It is estimated that up to 10% of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases can be attributable to a mutation in an LQTS or CPVT susceptibility gene.129 An increased understanding of these molecular pathways regulating ion channels will help clarify the disease phenotype differences.
Cardiovascular malformations (CVMs) constitute the most common group of birth defects, accounting for ~25% of all birth defects. The birth prevalence for all CVMs is 6–8 per 1,000 live births, with rates increasing with advances in imaging technology that led to discovery of milder defects.130132 Improved medical treatment and surgical palliation has led to a burgeoning population of adult survivors of CVMs, but deaths from CVMs still account for 40% of all deaths from birth defects.
Both birth defect registry studies and population based case-control studies have been performed for CVMs to define the epidemiology and identify specific etiologies. The Baltimore Washington Infant Study (BWIS) was instrumental in defining population-based risk factors for CVMs classified into specific mechanistic groups.133 This study identified many important features of CVMs at a population level, such as sex and race differences for specific groups of defects, recurrence of specific CVMs within families, and the increased risk for CVMs in maternal diabetes. While a number of studies, including the BWIS, have searched for environmental factors at the population level, the resulting data has been less conclusive.134 Only a limited number of prenatal exposures of the fetus are known environmental risk factors and they include alcohol, retinoic acid, and anticonvulsants, and maternal diseases such as rubella, influenza, diabetes, and phenylketonuria.
Multiple studies show CVMs possess high heritability and increased recurrence risk above the general population suggesting a role for genetic contributors.135 Identified genetic causes include chromosomal microdeletions or microduplications (22q11), and aneuploidy (trisomies 13, 18, and 21, and monosomy X) (Table IV) and were uncovered by standard cytogenetic methodology. Although for the vast majority of cases, the underlying cause is unknown, it is clear that the complex process of heart development is guided by a combination of a carefully orchestrated genetic program and hemodynamic forces. This intricate process of cardiac morphogenesis with its multiple cellular contributors is controlled by a set of highly conserved molecular pathways. Studies using diverse species, from flies to mice, have led to the identification of many genes critical for normal cardiac development.136, 137 This knowledge of cardiac developmental biology has assisted investigators in the elucidation of the genetic contributors of human CVM. In this section, we discuss the genetic causes of syndromic and non-syndromic CVM that were discovered using Mendelian cases of disease and highlight how the knowledge of cardiac development genes assisted in gene discovery.
Table IV
Table IV
Common Syndromes Resulting from Anueploidy and Microdeletions
Single Gene Defects Associated with Syndromic and Non-syndromic CVM
With advances in genetic technology and the completion of the Human Genome Project, single gene defects leading to syndromes associated with congenital heart disease have been elucidated and they are summarized in Table VA. Some of the earliest work was the discovery that mutation of Fibrillin 1 (FBN1) was the cause of MFS (discussed earlier). Since then the genetic basis of numerous syndromes have been identified and each is characterized by a unique constellation of birth defects. One of the first was Holt-Oram syndrome, which is characterized by atrial and ventricular septal defects, progressive atrioventricular conduction system disease, and radial limb and thumb anomalies. Classic positional approaches were utilized to first identify the genetic locus on chromosome 12q2138 and subsequently, disease-causing mutations were discovered in the transcription factor, TBX5.139 Another common syndrome, which frequently exhibits CVMs, is Noonan syndrome. The phenotype consists of cardiac defects, typically pulmonary valve stenosis and HCM, as well as cognitive disability, characteristic facies, and bleeding disorders. Using small families with autosomal dominantly inherited disease, investigators used a candidate gene based approach to identify mutations in PTPN11, a gene involved in Ras signaling and implicated by murine studies to be critical for semilunar valvulogenesis, to be the cause of 50% of cases.140, 141 Subsequent studies have found that mutations of other genes involved in the Ras signaling pathway including RAF1, SOS1, and KRAS were also associated with a similar spectrum of disease. In addition, LEOPARD and Costello syndromes, which exhibit a similar phenotype as Noonan syndrome, are the result of mutations in Ras signaling pathway members.142, 143 Alagille syndrome is characterized by intrahepatic bile duct paucity and cardiovascular malformations, including peripheral pulmonic stenosis, pulmonary valve stenosis, and tetralogy of Fallot. Disease-segregating mutations in JAG1, a gene encoding a ligand in the Notch signaling pathway, were identified by studying several small families with autosomal dominant disease.144, 145 Consistent with this, mutations in a NOTCH receptor, NOTCH2, have also been identified in subjects with Alagille syndrome using a candidate gene approach.146 A rare genetic syndrome that is characterized by dysmorphic facies and digit anomalies along with congenital heart disease (specifically patent ductus arteriosus) was found to be caused by mutations in the transcription factor, TFAP2b using traditional approaches after the identification of large kindreds.147 Lastly, heterotaxy syndrome, which is randomization of cardiac, pulmonary and gastrointestinal situs, is frequently associated with CVMs, specifically atrioventricular septal defects, and transposed great arteries. Disease-causing mutations in ZIC3 were identified in an X-linked form of heterotaxy.148 After this discovery, ZIC3 was shown to be critical in left-right development in vivo149 and subsequently mutations in CFC1, ACVR2B, and LEFTYA, genes that regulate left-right asymmetry in the developing embryo were found to be associated with heterotaxy.150
Table V
Table V
Disease Genes for Cardiovascular Malformations
Over the past decade, single gene defects associated with isolated or non-syndromic congenital heart disease have been discovered (Table VB). The first gene identified to be associated with non-syndromic CVM was NKX2.5, which was identified by linkage analysis in families with autosomal dominant inherited atrial septal defects with atrioventricular conduction delay.151 Mutations in GATA4, a zinc finger transcription factor known to interact with NKX2.5, have been linked to isolated atrial septal defects without conduction system abnormalities using large multi-generation families. Interestingly, a mutation in Gata4 specifically disrupted an interaction with TBX5 152 and mutations in a common downstream target of GATA4 and TBX5, myosin heavy chain 6 (MYH6), have been identified as another cause of atrial septal defects.153 More recently, investigators have linked another GATA family member, GATA6, to truncus arteriosus using a candidate gene approach.154 Similarly another T-box family member, TBX20, was identified to cause CVM, predominantly cardiac septal and valve defects, in several small families with autosomal dominant disease.155 Additionally, mutations in NOTCH1 have been identified as a cause of aortic valve malformations, including bicuspid aortic valve and early aortic valve calcification, via genome-wide linkage analysis of an affected family156. Subsequent studies have expanded the phenotype to a spectrum of malformations that affect left-sided cardiac structures.157 These discoveries that syndromic and non-syndromic CVM are caused by single gene defects were facilitated by studies in families with Mendelian inherited disease and even in those cases where candidate gene approaches were utilized, the availability of small pedigrees allowed for increased confidence that disease-segregating mutations were truly causal. Ultimately, these initial discoveries will reveal more about the molecular pathways that are critical for cardiac morphogenesis and relevant to human CVMs.
Unlike for the other cardiovascular diseases described earlier, the translation of the genetic discoveries for CVMs to the clinic is still in its early stages. The knowledge of genetic etiologies for syndromic cases has been utilized for genetic testing in only a subset of cases that are difficult to define. Often, determining the diagnosis in syndromic cases has significant prognostic implications, which are useful for the clinician especially in regards to neurodevelopmental outcomes. At this time, the genetic knowledge that has been gained from the discovery of genetic causes of non-syndromic CVM has focused on development of transgenic mouse models, which have allowed for an increased understanding of the molecular pathways regulating heart development. The information has been less useful clinically as the identified genetic causes have ultimately been found to represent only a small percentage of cases of CVM158161 and no clear genotype-phenotype correlations have been identified. At this time, the etiology for most isolated cases of non-syndromic CVM remains unknown and it is likely that rare functional sequence variations in genes critical for cardiac morphogenesis are present in affected individuals. Future studies utilizing new diagnostic methods, such as next-generation sequencing, may ultimately provide a more accurate genetic predisposition risk for CVM. Ultimately, the discovery of CVM-causing genes and associated animal models may allow us to test environmental influences on genetic predispositions and possibly devise novel preventive measures that reduce the incidence of congenital heart defects.
From chromosomal aneuploidy to single gene defects causing cardiovascular disease, genetics has a much greater influence on the development of various types of heart disease than previously appreciated135. This review summarizes many genetic causes for cardiovascular diseases, which were identified by positional cloning approaches utilizing families with Mendelian inherited forms of disease. Several new methodologies hold great promise to identify many more disease-associated genetics variants. We are just beginning to understand the significance of copy number variations in cardiac disease.162164 As the cost of DNA sequencing decreases, sequencing of entire genomes will lead to an increased rate of gene discovery in cardiovascular disease likely utilizing even smaller families with Mendelian disease.56, 165 Armed with these new cardiac disease-causing genes and the development of international collaborative databases with phenotypic information will allow for the study of clinical outcomes and prognosis based on genetic predispositions. This new genetic knowledge of cardiovascular diseases will lead to improved genetic counseling and the development of novel therapeutics to benefit future generations.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank S. Koenig for assistance in preparation of the tables.
Statement of financial support: V.G. is supported by grants from the NIH/NHLBI (R01HL088965) and the Children’s Heart Foundation. K.L.M. is supported by NIH/NHLBI (R01HL090506).
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest. None.
1. Heron M, et al. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2007. Pediatrics. 2010;125:4–15. [PubMed]
2. Lloyd-Jones D, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:948–954. [PubMed]
3. Gaziano TA, et al. Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-income countries. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010;35:72–115. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Hospital stays, hospital charges, and in-hospital deaths among infants with selected birth defects--United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:25–29. [PubMed]
5. Marelli AJ, et al. Congenital heart disease in the general population: changing prevalence and age distribution. Circulation. 2007;115:163–172. [PubMed]
6. Pillutla P, Shetty KD, Foster E. Mortality associated with adult congenital heart disease: Trends in the US population from 1979 to 2005. Am Heart J. 2009;158:874–879. [PubMed]
7. Arking DE, Chakravarti A. Understanding cardiovascular disease through the lens of genome-wide association studies. Trends Genet. 2009;25:387–394. [PubMed]
8. Maron BJ, et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1687–1713. [PubMed]
9. Maron BJ, et al. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a general population of young adults. Echocardiographic analysis of 4111 subjects in the CARDIA Study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in (Young) Adults. Circulation. 1995;92:785–789. [PubMed]
10. Maron BJ, et al. Sudden deaths in young competitive athletes: analysis of 1866 deaths in the United States, 1980–2006. Circulation. 2009;119:1085–1092. [PubMed]
11. Teare D. Asymmetrical hypertrophy of the heart in young adults. Br Heart J. 1958;20:1–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Geisterfer-Lowrance AA, et al. A molecular basis for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a beta cardiac myosin heavy chain gene missense mutation. Cell. 1990;62:999–1006. [PubMed]
13. Bowles NE, Bowles KR, Towbin JA. The “final common pathway” hypothesis and inherited cardiovascular disease. The role of cytoskeletal proteins in dilated cardiomyopathy. Herz. 2000;25:168–175. [PubMed]
14. Morita H, et al. Shared genetic causes of cardiac hypertrophy in children and adults. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1899–1908. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Saltzman AJ, et al. Short communication: the cardiac myosin binding protein C Arg502Trp mutation: a common cause of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Res. 2010;106:1549–1552. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Bos JM, Towbin JA, Ackerman MJ. Diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications of genetic testing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:201–211. [PubMed]
17. Niimura H, et al. Sarcomere protein gene mutations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy of the elderly. Circulation. 2002;105:446–451. [PubMed]
18. Watkins H, et al. Characteristics and prognostic implications of myosin missense mutations in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1108–1114. [PubMed]
19. Ackerman MJ, et al. Prevalence and age-dependence of malignant mutations in the beta-myosin heavy chain and troponin T genes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a comprehensive outpatient perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:2042–2048. [PubMed]
20. Moolman JC, et al. Sudden death due to troponin T mutations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:549–555. [PubMed]
21. Varnava AM, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: histopathological features of sudden death in cardiac troponin T disease. Circulation. 2001;104:1380–1384. [PubMed]
22. Watkins H, et al. Mutations in the genes for cardiac troponin T and alpha-tropomyosin in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1058–1064. [PubMed]
23. Olivotto I, et al. Myofilament protein gene mutation screening and outcome of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:630–638. [PubMed]
24. Ingles J, et al. Compound and double mutations in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: implications for genetic testing and counselling. J Med Genet. 2005;42:e59. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Girolami F, et al. Clinical features and outcome of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with triple sarcomere protein gene mutations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1444–1453. [PubMed]
26. Richard P, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: distribution of disease genes, spectrum of mutations, and implications for a molecular diagnosis strategy. Circulation. 2003;107:2227–2232. [PubMed]
27. Van Driest SL, et al. Myosin binding protein C mutations and compound heterozygosity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1903–1910. [PubMed]
28. Fitzgerald-Butt SM, et al. Parental knowledge and attitudes toward hypertrophic cardiomyopathy genetic testing. Pediatr Cardiol. 2009;31:195–202. [PubMed]
29. Christiaans I, et al. Quality of life and psychological distress in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation carriers: a cross-sectional cohort study. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A:602–612. [PubMed]
30. Ingles J, et al. Psychosocial impact of specialized cardiac genetic clinics for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Genet Med. 2008;10:117–120. [PubMed]
31. Mestroni L, et al. Guidelines for the study of familial dilated cardiomyopathies. Collaborative Research Group of the European Human and Capital Mobility Project on Familial Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:93–102. [PubMed]
32. Jefferies JL, Towbin JA. Dilated cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2010;375:752–762. [PubMed]
33. Codd MB, et al. Epidemiology of idiopathic dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1975–1984. Circulation. 1989;80:564–572. [PubMed]
34. Towbin JA, et al. Incidence, causes, and outcomes of dilated cardiomyopathy in children. JAMA. 2006;296:1867–1876. [PubMed]
35. Burkett EL, Hershberger RE. Clinical and genetic issues in familial dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:969–981. [PubMed]
36. Michels VV, et al. The frequency of familial dilated cardiomyopathy in a series of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:77–82. [PubMed]
37. Baig MK, et al. Familial dilated cardiomyopathy: cardiac abnormalities are common in asymptomatic relatives and may represent early disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:195–201. [PubMed]
38. Grunig E, et al. Frequency and phenotypes of familial dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:186–194. [PubMed]
39. Keeling PJ, et al. Familial dilated cardiomyopathy in the United Kingdom. Br Heart J. 1995;73:417–421. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Morales A, et al. Rare variant mutations in pregnancy-associated or peripartum cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2010;121:2176–2182. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. van Spaendonck-Zwarts KY, et al. Peripartum cardiomyopathy as a part of familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2010;121:2169–2175. [PubMed]
42. Towbin JA, Bowles NE. The failing heart. Nature. 2002;415:227–233. [PubMed]
43. Hershberger RE, et al. Coding sequence mutations identified in MYH7, TNNT2, SCN5A, CSRP3, LBD3, and TCAP from 313 patients with familial or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Clin Transl Sci. 2008;1:21–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Parks SB, et al. Lamin A/C mutation analysis in a cohort of 324 unrelated patients with idiopathic or familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 2008;156:161–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Kamisago M, et al. Mutations in sarcomere protein genes as a cause of dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1688–1696. [PubMed]
46. van Tintelen JP, et al. High yield of LMNA mutations in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and/or conduction disease referred to cardiogenetics outpatient clinics. Am Heart J. 2007;154:1130–1139. [PubMed]
47. Maron BJ, et al. Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation. 2006;113:1807–1816. [PubMed]
48. Basso C, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2009;373:1289–1300. [PubMed]
49. Scaglia F, et al. Clinical spectrum, morbidity, and mortality in 113 pediatric patients with mitochondrial disease. Pediatrics. 2004;114:925–931. [PubMed]
50. Wilcken DE. Overview of inherited metabolic disorders causing cardiovascular disease. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2003;26:245–257. [PubMed]
51. Finsterer J, Stollberger C. Primary myopathies and the heart. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2008;42:9–24. [PubMed]
52. Beaudet AL, Belmont JW. Array-based DNA diagnostics: let the revolution begin. Annu Rev Med. 2008;59:113–129. [PubMed]
53. Fokstuen S, et al. A DNA resequencing array for pathogenic mutation detection in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:879–885. [PubMed]
54. Waldmuller S, et al. Array-based resequencing assay for mutations causing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Clin Chem. 2008;54:682–687. [PubMed]
55. Zimmerman RS, et al. A novel custom resequencing array for dilated cardiomyopathy. Genet Med. 2010;12:268–278. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Lupski JR, et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing in a Patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy. N Engl J Med 2010 [PubMed]
57. Okou DT, et al. Microarray-based genomic selection for high-throughput resequencing. Nat Methods. 2007;4:907–909. [PubMed]
58. Albert TJ, et al. Direct selection of human genomic loci by microarray hybridization. Nat Methods. 2007;4:903–905. [PubMed]
59. Gnirke A, et al. Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:182–189. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Elefteriades JA, Farkas EA. Thoracic aortic aneurysm clinically pertinent controversies and uncertainties. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:841–857. [PubMed]
61. Clouse WD, et al. Acute aortic dissection: population-based incidence compared with degenerative aortic aneurysm rupture. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:176–180. [PubMed]
62. Keane MG, Pyeritz RE. Medical management of Marfan syndrome. Circulation. 2008;117:2802–2813. [PubMed]
63. De Paepe A, et al. Revised diagnostic criteria for the Marfan syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1996;62:417–426. [PubMed]
64. Dietz HC, et al. Marfan syndrome caused by a recurrent de novo missense mutation in the fibrillin gene. Nature. 1991;352:337–339. [PubMed]
65. Maslen CL, et al. Partial sequence of a candidate gene for the Marfan syndrome. Nature. 1991;352:334–337. [PubMed]
66. Lee B, et al. Linkage of Marfan syndrome and a phenotypically related disorder to two different fibrillin genes. Nature. 1991;352:330–334. [PubMed]
67. Stheneur C, et al. Identification of the minimal combination of clinical features in probands for efficient mutation detection in the FBN1 gene. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:1121–1128. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Faivre L, et al. Effect of mutation type and location on clinical outcome in 1,013 probands with Marfan syndrome or related phenotypes and FBN1 mutations: an international study. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:454–466. [PubMed]
69. Neptune ER, et al. Dysregulation of TGF-beta activation contributes to pathogenesis in Marfan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2003;33:407–411. [PubMed]
70. Loeys BL, et al. A syndrome of altered cardiovascular, craniofacial, neurocognitive and skeletal development caused by mutations in TGFBR1 or TGFBR2. Nat Genet. 2005;37:275–281. [PubMed]
71. Loeys BL, et al. Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF-beta receptor. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:788–798. [PubMed]
72. Callewaert B, et al. Ehlers-Danlos syndromes and Marfan syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008;22:165–189. [PubMed]
73. McDonnell NB, et al. Echocardiographic findings in classical and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140:129–136. [PubMed]
74. Wenstrup RJ, et al. Prevalence of aortic root dilation in the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Genet Med. 2002;4:112–117. [PubMed]
75. Nicod P, et al. Familial aortic dissecting aneurysm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:811–819. [PubMed]
76. Biddinger A, et al. Familial thoracic aortic dilatations and dissections: a case control study. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:506–511. [PubMed]
77. Coady MA, et al. Familial patterns of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Arch Surg. 1999;134:361–367. [PubMed]
78. Milewicz DM, et al. Reduced penetrance and variable expressivity of familial thoracic aortic aneurysms/dissections. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:474–479. [PubMed]
79. Albornoz G, et al. Familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections--incidence, modes of inheritance, and phenotypic patterns. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:1400–1405. [PubMed]
80. Davies RR, et al. Natural history of ascending aortic aneurysms in the setting of an unreplaced bicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1338–1344. [PubMed]
81. Keane MG, et al. Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. Circulation. 2000;102:III35–39. [PubMed]
82. Biner S, et al. Aortopathy is prevalent in relatives of bicuspid aortic valve patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2288–2295. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. Jiang X, et al. Fate of the mammalian cardiac neural crest. Development. 2000;127:1607–1616. [PubMed]
84. Tran-Fadulu V, et al. Analysis of multigenerational families with thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections due to TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 mutations. J Med Genet. 2009;46:607–613. [PubMed]
85. Guo DC, et al. Mutations in smooth muscle alpha-actin (ACTA2) lead to thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1488–1493. [PubMed]
86. Pannu H, et al. Mutations in transforming growth factor-beta receptor type II cause familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Circulation. 2005;112:513–520. [PubMed]
87. Zhu L, et al. Mutations in myosin heavy chain 11 cause a syndrome associating thoracic aortic aneurysm/aortic dissection and patent ductus arteriosus. Nat Genet. 2006;38:343–349. [PubMed]
88. McKellar SH, et al. Novel NOTCH1 mutations in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease and thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:290–296. [PubMed]
89. Guo DC, et al. Mutations in smooth muscle alpha-actin (ACTA2) cause coronary artery disease, stroke, and Moyamoya disease, along with thoracic aortic disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:617–627. [PubMed]
90. Habashi JP, et al. Losartan, an AT1 antagonist, prevents aortic aneurysm in a mouse model of Marfan syndrome. Science. 2006;312:117–121. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
91. Brooke BS, et al. Angiotensin II blockade and aortic-root dilation in Marfan’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2787–2795. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
92. Gambarin FI, et al. Rationale and design of a trial evaluating the effects of losartan vs. nebivolol vs. the association of both on the progression of aortic root dilation in Marfan syndrome with FBN1 gene mutations. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2009;10:354–362. [PubMed]
93. Lacro RV, et al. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial of beta-blocker therapy (atenolol) versus angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy (losartan) in individuals with Marfan syndrome. Am Heart J. 2007;154:624–631. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
94. Radonic T, et al. Losartan therapy in adults with Marfan syndrome: study protocol of the multi-center randomized controlled COMPARE trial. Trials. 2010;11:3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
95. Keating MT, Sanguinetti MC. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias. Cell. 2001;104:569–580. [PubMed]
96. Schwartz PJ, et al. Diagnostic criteria for the long QT syndrome. An update. Circulation. 1993;88:782–784. [PubMed]
97. Crotti L, et al. Congenital long QT syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3:18. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
98. Goldenberg I, Zareba W, Moss AJ. Long QT Syndrome. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2008;33:629–694. [PubMed]
99. Romano C, Gemme G, Pongiglione R. [Rare Cardiac Arrythmias of the Pediatric Age. Ii. Syncopal Attacks Due to Paroxysmal Ventricular Fibrillation. (Presentation of 1st Case in Italian Pediatric Literature)] Clin Pediatr (Bologna) 1963;45:656–683. [PubMed]
100. Ward OC. A New Familial Cardiac Syndrome in Children. J Ir Med Assoc. 1964;54:103–106. [PubMed]
101. Jervell A, Lange-Nielsen F. Congenital deaf-mutism, functional heart disease with prolongation of the Q-T interval and sudden death. Am Heart J. 1957;54:59–68. [PubMed]
102. Tawil R, et al. Andersen’s syndrome: potassium-sensitive periodic paralysis, ventricular ectopy, and dysmorphic features. Ann Neurol. 1994;35:326–330. [PubMed]
103. Tristani-Firouzi M, et al. Functional and clinical characterization of KCNJ2 mutations associated with LQT7 (Andersen syndrome) J Clin Invest. 2002;110:381–388. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
104. Splawski I, et al. Ca(V)1.2 calcium channel dysfunction causes a multisystem disorder including arrhythmia and autism. Cell. 2004;119:19–31. [PubMed]
105. Wang Q, et al. SCN5A mutations associated with an inherited cardiac arrhythmia, long QT syndrome. Cell. 1995;80:805–811. [PubMed]
106. Curran ME, et al. A molecular basis for cardiac arrhythmia: HERG mutations cause long QT syndrome. Cell. 1995;80:795–803. [PubMed]
107. Hedley PL, et al. The genetic basis of long QT and short QT syndromes: a mutation update. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:1486–1511. [PubMed]
108. Lehnart SE, et al. Inherited arrhythmias: a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Office of Rare Diseases workshop consensus report about the diagnosis, phenotyping, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic approaches for primary cardiomyopathies of gene mutations affecting ion channel function. Circulation. 2007;116:2325–2345. [PubMed]
109. Schwartz PJ, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in the long-QT syndrome: gene-specific triggers for life-threatening arrhythmias. Circulation. 2001;103:89–95. [PubMed]
110. Moss AJ, et al. ECG T-wave patterns in genetically distinct forms of the hereditary long QT syndrome. Circulation. 1995;92:2929–2934. [PubMed]
111. Moss AJ, et al. Effectiveness and limitations of beta-blocker therapy in congenital long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2000;101:616–623. [PubMed]
112. Antzelevitch C, et al. Brugada syndrome: 1992–2002: a historical perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1665–1671. [PubMed]
113. Brugada P, Brugada J. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. A multicenter report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1391–1396. [PubMed]
114. Chen Q, et al. Genetic basis and molecular mechanism for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Nature. 1998;392:293–296. [PubMed]
115. Hedley PL, et al. The genetic basis of Brugada syndrome: a mutation update. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:1256–1266. [PubMed]
116. Leenhardt A, et al. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in children. A 7-year follow-up of 21 patients. Circulation. 1995;91:1512–1519. [PubMed]
117. Reid DS, et al. Bidirectional tachycardia in a child. A study using His bundle electrography. Br Heart J. 1975;37:339–344. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
118. Mohamed U, Napolitano C, Priori SG. Molecular and electrophysiological bases of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:791–797. [PubMed]
119. Swan H, et al. Arrhythmic disorder mapped to chromosome 1q42-q43 causes malignant polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in structurally normal hearts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:2035–2042. [PubMed]
120. Laitinen PJ, et al. Mutations of the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) gene in familial polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2001;103:485–490. [PubMed]
121. Priori SG, et al. Mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor gene (hRyR2) underlie catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2001;103:196–200. [PubMed]
122. Wehrens XH, et al. FKBP12.6 deficiency and defective calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor) function linked to exercise-induced sudden cardiac death. Cell. 2003;113:829–840. [PubMed]
123. Wehrens XH, Lehnart SE, Marks AR. Ryanodine receptor-targeted anti-arrhythmic therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1047:366–375. [PubMed]
124. Cerrone M, et al. Arrhythmogenic mechanisms in a mouse model of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circ Res. 2007;101:1039–1048. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
125. Knollmann BC, et al. Casq2 deletion causes sarcoplasmic reticulum volume increase, premature Ca2+ release, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:2510–2520. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
126. Watanabe H, et al. Flecainide prevents catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in mice and humans. Nat Med. 2009;15:380–383. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
127. Kannankeril PJ, Roden DM. Drug-induced long QT and torsade de pointes: recent advances. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007;22:39–43. [PubMed]
128. Splawski I, et al. Variant of SCN5A sodium channel implicated in risk of cardiac arrhythmia. Science. 2002;297:1333–1336. [PubMed]
129. Tester DJ, Ackerman MJ. Cardiomyopathic and channelopathic causes of sudden unexplained death in infants and children. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:69–84. [PubMed]
130. Bruneau BG. The developmental genetics of congenital heart disease. Nature. 2008;451:943–948. [PubMed]
131. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1890–1900. [PubMed]
132. Oyen N, et al. National time trends in congenital heart defects, Denmark, 1977–2005. Am Heart J. 2009;157:467–473. e461. [PubMed]
133. Ferencz C. Epidemiology of congenital heart disease : the Baltimore-Washington infant study 1981–1989. Futura Publishing; Mount Kisco, N.Y: 1993.
134. Jenkins KJ, et al. Noninherited risk factors and congenital cardiovascular defects: current knowledge: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation. 2007;115:2995–3014. [PubMed]
135. Pierpont ME, et al. Genetic basis for congenital heart defects: current knowledge: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation. 2007;115:3015–3038. [PubMed]
136. Olson EN. Gene regulatory networks in the evolution and development of the heart. Science. 2006;313:1922–1927. [PubMed]
137. Srivastava D. Making or breaking the heart: from lineage determination to morphogenesis. Cell. 2006;126:1037–1048. [PubMed]
138. Basson CT, et al. The clinical and genetic spectrum of the Holt-Oram syndrome (heart-hand syndrome) N Engl J Med. 1994;330:885–891. [PubMed]
139. Basson CT, et al. Mutations in human TBX5 [corrected] cause limb and cardiac malformation in Holt-Oram syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;15:30–35. [PubMed]
140. Chen B, et al. Mice mutant for Egfr and Shp2 have defective cardiac semilunar valvulogenesis. Nat Genet. 2000;24:296–299. [PubMed]
141. Tartaglia M, et al. Mutations in PTPN11, encoding the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2, cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2001;29:465–468. [PubMed]
142. Aoki Y, et al. The RAS/MAPK syndromes: novel roles of the RAS pathway in human genetic disorders. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:992–1006. [PubMed]
143. Schubbert S, Bollag G, Shannon K. Deregulated Ras signaling in developmental disorders: new tricks for an old dog. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007;17:15–22. [PubMed]
144. Li L, et al. Alagille syndrome is caused by mutations in human Jagged1, which encodes a ligand for Notch1. Nat Genet. 1997;16:243–251. [PubMed]
145. Oda T, et al. Mutations in the human Jagged1 gene are responsible for Alagille syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;16:235–242. [PubMed]
146. McDaniell R, et al. NOTCH2 mutations cause Alagille syndrome, a heterogeneous disorder of the notch signaling pathway. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79:169–173. [PubMed]
147. Satoda M, et al. Mutations in TFAP2B cause Char syndrome, a familial form of patent ductus arteriosus. Nat Genet. 2000;25:42–46. [PubMed]
148. Gebbia M, et al. X-linked situs abnormalities result from mutations in ZIC3. Nat Genet. 1997;17:305–308. [PubMed]
149. Purandare SM, et al. A complex syndrome of left-right axis, central nervous system and axial skeleton defects in Zic3 mutant mice. Development. 2002;129:2293–2302. [PubMed]
150. Zhu L, Belmont JW, Ware SM. Genetics of human heterotaxias. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14:17–25. [PubMed]
151. Schott JJ, et al. Congenital heart disease caused by mutations in the transcription factor NKX2–5. Science. 1998;281:108–111. [PubMed]
152. Garg V, et al. GATA4 mutations cause human congenital heart defects and reveal an interaction with TBX5. Nature. 2003;424:443–447. [PubMed]
153. Ching YH, et al. Mutation in myosin heavy chain 6 causes atrial septal defect. Nat Genet. 2005;37:423–428. [PubMed]
154. Kodo K, et al. GATA6 mutations cause human cardiac outflow tract defects by disrupting semaphorin-plexin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13933–13938. [PubMed]
155. Kirk EP, et al. Mutations in cardiac T-box factor gene TBX20 are associated with diverse cardiac pathologies, including defects of septation and valvulogenesis and cardiomyopathy. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:280–291. [PubMed]
156. Garg V, et al. Mutations in NOTCH1 cause aortic valve disease. Nature. 2005;437:270–274. [PubMed]
157. McBride KL, et al. NOTCH1 mutations in individuals with left ventricular outflow tract malformations reduce ligand-induced signaling. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:2886–2893. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
158. Goldmuntz E, Geiger E, Benson DW. NKX2.5 mutations in patients with tetralogy of fallot. Circulation. 2001;104:2565–2568. [PubMed]
159. Rajagopal SK, et al. Spectrum of heart disease associated with murine and human GATA4 mutation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2007;43:677–685. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
160. Schluterman MK, et al. Screening and biochemical analysis of GATA4 sequence variations identified in patients with congenital heart disease. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A:817–823. [PubMed]
161. Tomita-Mitchell A, et al. GATA4 sequence variants in patients with congenital heart disease. J Med Genet. 2007;44:779–783. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
162. Greenway SC, et al. De novo copy number variants identify new genes and loci in isolated sporadic tetralogy of Fallot. Nat Genet. 2009;41:931–935. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
163. Redon R, et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature. 2006;444:444–454. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
164. Richards AA, et al. Cryptic Chromosomal Abnormalities Identified in Children With Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Res. 2008;64:358–363. [PubMed]
165. Roach JC, et al. Analysis of genetic inheritance in a family quartet by whole-genome sequencing. Science. 2010;328:636–639. [PMC free article] [PubMed]