PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

Logo of annsurginresBioMed CentralBiomed Central Web Sitesearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleAnnals of Surgical Innovation and Research
 
From:
Published online 2012 September 4. doi: 10.1186/1750-1164-6-8
Table 3
Pooled colonisation and CRBSI data
Colonisation
CRBSI
 Catheter No.No. Colonisation% Colonisation Catheter No.No. CRBSI% CRBSI
CVC
8257
738
8.94
CVC
9503
96
1.01
PICC62--PICC6223.23
CVC colonization: Pooled data includes Dimick and Guillou and Bijma’s post-intervention CVC colonisation data. Pawar and Gunst failed to record CVC colonisation incidence as part of their respective studies. PICC colonization: As Gunst and Miyagaki failed to record PICC colonisation incidence as part of their respective studies; we have no pooled PICC colonisation data. CVC CRBSI: We pooled the CVC-related bloodstream infection data from Bijma’s post-intervention group, Sandoe, Pawar, Guillou and Gunst’s studies. PICC CRBSI: We pooled Gunst and Miyagaki’s PICC-related bloodstream infection data. Excluded data: Bijma’s pre-intervention data was excluded from the pooled data as it established the baseline colonisation and infection incidence by which the efficacy of the intervention was measured in the post-intervention group. Dimick’s mixed catheter bloodstream infection data (that included 348 pulmonary artery catheters) was excluded from the pooled data, as we were unable to extract the CVC-related bloodstream infection incidence. Sandoe’s mixed colonisation data (that included 4 arterial catheters) was excluded from the pooled data, as we were unable to extract data relating to CVC colonisation incidence and catheter days.
Articles from Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central