In this study investigating TTR values in blood and CSF of LBD patients, CSF TTR levels were significantly higher in this cohort of patients compared to controls. The effect was mainly driven by non-demented LBD patients, explaining, as a diagnosis, approximately 7 percent of the variation in the CSF TTR levels. This makes it tempting to speculate that Asyn pathology alone (PDND patients rarely have marked additional brain pathology such as leucoaraiosis
[38],
[39] and Abeta
1–42 pathology
[4],
[23],
[40]) induces expression of central TTR. This observation may be explained by the known occurrence of oxidative stress in LBD
[35],
[41], as CSF TTR values have been observed to rise in response to oxidative stress
[14]. In addition, an involvement of TTR in inflammatory processes - a common feature observed in brains of patients suffering from LBD - has also been suggested
[42]. In the light of previous reports which mainly found
decreased CSF TTR levels in disorders that are not primarily associated with inflammation (i.e., depression
[43], AD
[14],
[24] and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
[44]), but
increased levels in disorders typically associated with inflammatory processes (such as Guillain Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy
[45]–
[47]) it may be interesting to focus in future studies on putative interaction pathways between inflammation and TTR in Asyn-associated pathology.
Actually it is not entirely clear whether (misfolded) Asyn is a target protein of TTR. The latter mainly functions as a transport protein, and is able to transfer e.g. Abeta
1–42, as a misfolded peptide, from the neuron to the CSF
[25]. A recent study also showed that Abeta
1–42-stressed neurons increase the expression of TTR
[48]. Thus it is intriguing to hypothesize that Asyn is also a target protein of TTR, and TTR may have an influence on Asyn-associated pathology. Indeed, indirect evidence for this suggestion comes from a recent study investigating levels of monomeric and oligomeric Asyn in saliva using MALDI-TOFTOF MSMS ion search and Western blotting
[27]. In this study, symptomatic individuals with a heterozygous V30M mutation in
TTR had much more intense Asyn-positive bands and a higher number of such bands at higher molecular mass (indicative of oligomeric forms of Asyn) than had control individuals and, most interestingly,
TTR mutation carriers who underwent orthotropic liver transplantation. This strongly indicates that TTR is associated with clearance of (misfolded) Asyn.
Interestingly, demented LBD patients had relatively low CSF TTR levels, comparable to controls
[49]. This is exciting in the light of recent studies demonstrating decreased CSF TTR levels in AD patients
[14],
[24], and the regular occurrence of Abeta
1–42 pathology in demented LBD patients. Together with the observation that PDND patients have increased CSF TTR levels one may hypothesize that demented LBD patients face two driving forces with regard to TTR-associated pathways: Asyn pathology which goes along with increased TTR expression, and Abeta
1–42 pathology associated with decreased TTR expression. Based on the abovementioned associations between TTR levels and amyloid pathology, one can also hypothesize that increased TTR levels in the brain protect against Abeta
1–42 pathology. Indeed, there is accumulating evidence from
in-vitro and
in-vivo studies that TTR has beneficial direct and indirect effects on Abeta-associated pathology (reviewed in
[14]).
Serum TTR levels were not significantly different between LBD patients and controls. Post-hoc analyses demonstrated slightly reduced TTR levels in demented compared to non-demented LBD patients. Although results did not survive correction for multiple testing, they may motivate to future, hypothesis-driven studies focusing on this particular aspect as decreased serum TTR levels have already been described in AD patients
[22],
[23],
[50],, and are regarded as a biochemical marker for malnutrition
[25],
[51] and inflammation
[52].
We found weak but significant negative correlations between CSF TTR levels and the three actually best-established neurodegenerative markers in CSF, i.e. Abeta
1–42, total tau and phospho-tau. Together with the observed lack of such an association between peripheral TTR and these neurodegenerative markers, the observations may point to a specific interaction of central TTR with LBD-associated amyloid clearance. Higher CSF TTR levels were observed in non-demented LBD patients who regularly show relatively low CSF tau levels
[53],
[54]. This argues for an interaction of TTR with the specific neurodegenerative process (total tau) and axonal pathology (phospho-tau). The negative correlation between TTR and Abeta
1–42 CSF levels is somehow counterintuitive and more difficult to explain as, in individuals with Abeta
1–42 pathology, CSF Abeta
1–42 is regularly low and tau parameters are high. Under physiological conditions, CSF TTR binds Abeta
1–42 and keeps it soluble especially in CSF
[25]. Decreased CSF TTR values may indicate that this dynamic equilibrium is affected, leading to accumulation and aggregation of Abeta
1–42 proteins, amyloid formation, and neurotoxicity
[15].
Analysis of SNPs that have been shown to influence binding capacity of TTR to amyloid did not add relevant information in this study. This may be due to sample size, but also to the fact that rather the absolute quantity of TTR than its function may be associated with LBD pathophysiology. Interestingly, we also did not find a significant association between demographic and clinical parameters (except the above reported, diagnosis of LBD and occurrence of dementia), and TTR values. This may indicate that TTR, although obviously involved in amyloidogenic and clearance pathways in LBD, cannot serve as a marker of disease progression and severity.
In conclusion, data presented in this study argue for a role of TTR in both Asyn- and Abeta1–42-associated LBD pathologies. The obvious interaction of centrally produced TTR with pathophysiological mechanisms in these neurodegenerative processes should motivate to more in-depth analyses.