Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2012; 7(10): e48424.
Published online 2012 October 26. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0048424
PMCID: PMC3482213

A Cancer Vaccine Induces Expansion of NY-ESO-1-Specific Regulatory T Cells in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

Derya Unutmaz, Editor


Cancer vaccines are designed to expand tumor antigen-specific T cells with effector function. However, they may also inadvertently expand regulatory T cells (Treg), which could seriously hamper clinical efficacy. To address this possibility, we developed a novel assay to detect antigen-specific Treg based on down-regulation of surface CD3 following TCR engagement, and used this approach to screen for Treg specific to the NY-ESO-1 tumor antigen in melanoma patients treated with the NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIXTM cancer vaccine. All patients tested had Treg (CD25bright FoxP3+ CD127neg) specific for at least one NY-ESO-1 epitope in the blood. Strikingly, comparison with pre-treatment samples revealed that many of these responses were induced or boosted by vaccination. The most frequently detected response was toward the HLA-DP4-restricted NY-ESO-1157–170 epitope, which is also recognized by effector T cells. Notably, functional Treg specific for an HLA-DR-restricted epitope within the NY-ESO-1115–132 peptide were also identified at high frequency in tumor tissue, suggesting that NY-ESO-1-specific Treg may suppress local anti-tumor immune responses. Together, our data provide compelling evidence for the ability of a cancer vaccine to expand tumor antigen-specific Treg in the setting of advanced cancer, a finding which should be given serious consideration in the design of future cancer vaccine clinical trials.


Cancer vaccines hold great promise in the treatment of solid tumors such as melanoma, and have been the focus of extensive pre-clinical and clinical testing in recent years. Due to its exceptional immunogenicity, NY-ESO-1 has emerged as one of the most promising targets in such approaches [1]. Over the last several years, we have conducted a series of clinical trials in melanoma patients using a cancer vaccine consisting of full-length recombinant NY-ESO-1 protein formulated with ISCOMATRIXTM adjuvant (CSL Limited, Australia). Although this vaccine had potent anti-tumor effects in pre-clinical animal studies [2] and showed promising results in the initial Phase I study [3], it failed to significantly improve clinical outcome in melanoma patients in subsequent trials [4] and manuscript in preparation). Furthermore, while patients with fully resected (early-stage) disease developed strong effector T cell (Teff) responses to NY-ESO-1 following vaccination [3], [5], patients with advanced melanoma had much less robust responses [4].

Similar to our experience with the NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIXTM vaccine, many other cancer vaccines have also failed to induce significant clinical benefit, often despite the induction of seemingly potent tumor antigen-specific Teff responses [6], [7]. There are many potential explanations for this, but one that has received particular attention in recent years centers around the role of CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg). Treg are essential for preventing autoimmunity [8]. However, a growing body of evidence supports the concept that Treg can also block the generation of effective anti-tumor immunity [9]. It is therefore imperative that cancer vaccine approaches avoid expanding these cells.

Until recently, evidence for the recognition of tumor antigens by Treg had been scarce, and it was unclear whether or not Treg would be activated and expand in response to vaccination against tumor antigens. In recent years, however, a number of reports have identified Treg specific for a range of tumor antigens in human cancer, including NY-ESO-1, survivin, TRP-1, gp100, MAGE-A3, Melan-A, carcinoembryonic Ag (CEA), telomerase, HER2/neu, WT-1, MUC-1 and papillomavirus antigens E6 and E7 [10][16]. The presence of these cells in cancer patients raises serious concerns about the potential of cancer vaccines to expand not only Teff but also Treg. The extent to which this actually occurs, however, is poorly understood.

In the present study, we have evaluated the effect of vaccination with NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIXTM on the frequency of NY-ESO-1-specific Treg in patients with late-stage melanoma. As most Treg do not produce cytokines upon activation [17][19], there is currently no suitable assay available to screen for antigen-specific Treg. We have therefore developed a novel, systematic approach in which antigen-specific Treg are detected by down-regulation of surface T cell receptor (TCR)/CD3 complexes following in vitro stimulation with a library of short antigenic peptides. The optimization of this method has recently been described [20]. Here, we have used this approach to screen for NY-ESO-1-specific Treg in melanoma patients, before and after vaccination with the NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIXTM vaccine. This study has enabled us to gain an unprecedented understanding of tumor antigen-specific Treg in the setting of advanced cancer, including their function, location, the range of epitopes recognized and how their frequency is affected by vaccination.


A novel approach based on down-regulation of surface CD3 detects Teff and Treg specific for NY-ESO-1 peptides

In order to screen for NY-ESO-1-specific Treg in an unbiased manner, we developed an assay based on the principle that T cells down-modulate the number of CD3/TCR complexes on the cell surface following the binding of cognate antigen [21], [22]. This can be detected as a reduced level of cell surface CD3 staining by flow cytometry. Due to their scarcity, NY-ESO-1-specific Teff can almost never be detected directly ex vivo in blood samples using standard (IFN-γ intracellular cytokine staining) methodology but instead require prior expansion in vitro. Preliminary studies revealed that this was also the case for NY-ESO-1-specific Treg detected using the CD3 down-regulation method (unpublished observations). Accordingly, patient PBMC were cultured with a panel of 28 partially overlapping 18 amino acid peptides which collectively span the entire sequence of NY-ESO-1 [23], to allow expansion of NY-ESO-1-specific Teff and Treg to detectable frequencies. Conditions, including culture time, IL-2 concentration and source of serum, were optimized for Treg expansion [20]. After 21d expansion, cultures were re-stimulated with individual 18mer peptides and the level of surface CD3 determined by flow cytometry, in conjunction with staining for Treg markers.

An example of the results obtained is shown in Figure 1. These data demonstrate that a clear population of putative Treg could be detected within the CD4+ T cell population by co-staining for CD25 and FoxP3 (Fig 1A, left). Within this Treg subset, a distinct sub-population of CD3-low (antigen-specific) cells was apparent after re-stimulation with peptide NY-ESO-1157–174 but not NY-ESO-1127–144 or in the absence of re-stimulation (Fig 1A, upper panels). Conversely, a CD3-low sub-population could be detected within the Teff subset following re-stimulation with peptide NY-ESO-1127–144 but not NY-ESO-1157–174 (Fig 1A, lower panels). A summary of results for this patient using all 28 peptides demonstrates two distinct Treg responses, within regions NY-ESO-137–60 and NY-ESO-1157–180 (Fig 1B), and one major Teff response, within the region NY-ESO-1127–144 (Fig 1C).

Figure 1
Antigen-specific Treg and Teff can be detected by measuring down-regulation of surface.

We also sought to analyze the cytokine production profile of NY-ESO-1-specific Treg in four patients whose Treg down-regulated CD3 in response to NY-ESO-1 peptides, using intracellular cytokine staining. CD3-low Treg produced low to undetectable levels of IL-4, IL-10 and IL-17 in all patients. However, production of IFN-γ and TNF-α was variable, with two patients showing negligible production by the CD3-low Treg, and two patients showing high levels of production (Figure S1). The secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ by Treg has been described previously [16], [24][26], and appears to be a unique feature of Treg identified in cancer patients. However, our results show that this characteristic is sporadic, and can't be relied on for Treg identification.

Cells identified by the CD25+ FoxP3+ phenotype have phenotypic and functional characteristics of Treg

Both CD25 and FoxP3 are known to be transiently induced on Teff after activation, meaning that activated Teff can potentially be mistaken for Treg [27][30]. Given the extended culture period used (21d), it is unlikely that the cells identified as CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ in our culture system represent activated Teff, since expression of FoxP3, and to a lesser extent CD25, returns to baseline after ~10 days [12], [27], [28], [30]. However, to further demonstrate that these cells are indeed Treg, cultures were co-stained with an antibody to CD127, which is expressed at greatly reduced levels on Treg compared to Teff [31], [32]. Figure 2A demonstrates that cells identified as Treg (CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+) expressed barely detectable levels of CD127, whereas cells identified as Teff (CD4+ FoxP3) expressed uniformly high levels. Furthermore, when bulk Treg were FACS-sorted from 21d cultures (according to a CD4+ CD25+ CD127−/low phenotype), these cells induced a dose-dependent decrease in the proliferation of CD8+ T cells (Fig 2B).

Figure 2
CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ cells identified after culture have phenotypic and functional characteristics of Treg.

Finally, we sought to determine whether antigen-specific activation of Treg led to induced expression of the TGF-β latency-associated peptide (LAP) on the cell surface. Induction of LAP expression following activation is a characteristic unique to Treg, and this molecule is not expressed on Teff cells, even after activation [18], [33]. In order to directly compare activation-induced LAP expression on Treg and Teff, we identified three patients in which the Treg and Teff populations both down-regulated CD3 in response to the same peptide. PBMC from these patients were cultured for 21d with peptide, re-stimulated overnight and assessed for CD3 down-regulation and surface LAP expression. As shown in Figure 2C, LAP was clearly induced on a sub-population of Treg responding to NY-ESO-1 peptide, as identified by the CD3-low phenotype. In contrast, CD3-low Teff responding to the same peptide failed to up-regulate LAP.

Together, the expression of a CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ CD127 phenotype coupled with in vitro suppressive capacity and the ability to induce LAP expression strongly suggest that the cells analyzed here are functional Treg rather than activated Teff which have temporarily up-regulated FoxP3 expression.

Down-regulation of CD3 by Treg is dependent on peptide concentration

In this study, down-regulation of surface CD3 is used as a marker of antigen-specific activation of Tregs via the TCR. Thus, the extent of CD3 down-regulation would be expected to be strictly dependent on peptide concentration. To confirm this, peptide titration studies were performed using PBMC from 4 different patients. For each patient, two peptides were tested, which were selected on the basis of preliminary screening experiments as being able to induce a CD3 down-regulation response at 1×10−4M. As shown in Figure 3, there was a clear dose-dependent relationship between the proportion of CD3-low Treg and the concentration of peptide used for re-stimulation. A number of these responses could be titrated down to 1×10−7M peptide, which is comparable with several previously described CD4+ Teff responses to NY-ESO-1 peptides [5], [34]. It is also important to note that the 18mer peptides used here likely do not constitute the optimal epitope for T cell recognition, in which case the response detected when peptide concentration becomes limiting may be a considerable underestimate.

Figure 3
CD3 down-regulation on Tregs is dependent on the concentration of peptide used for re-stimulation.

NY-ESO-1-specific Treg are frequently detected in the blood of late-stage melanoma patients and can be expanded by the NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIXTM vaccine

A cohort of nine patients with advanced melanoma was screened for NY-ESO-1-specific Treg, both before and 42 days after vaccination with NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIXTM. The results are summarized in Figure 4A. After vaccination, all patients had Treg responses specific to at least one region of the NY-ESO-1 protein; several had responses to two or three distinct regions. Strikingly, a comparison with pre-vaccination samples revealed that many of these responses were induced by the vaccine, as they were undetectable prior to vaccination. An example of such a response is shown in Figure 4B. In addition, some responses that were detectable prior to vaccination appeared to be boosted by the vaccine (defined as a >2-fold increase in responsive cells after vaccination, when the two samples were compared in parallel under identical conditions). For example, in Patient 120, the frequency of Treg specific to peptide NY-ESO-137–54 was 4.4% before vaccination but 18.3% after vaccination, and the frequency of Treg specific to peptide NY-ESO-179–96 was 3.3% prior to vaccination and 16.3% after vaccination.

Figure 4
Summary of NY-ESO-1-specific Treg responses detected in a cohort of 9 patients vaccinated with NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIXTM vaccine.

Treg and Teff respond to an identical epitope in the region NY-ESO-1157–170

Figure 4A demonstrates that Treg responses were most commonly seen toward the peptide NY-ESO-1157–174, with Tregs specific to this 18mer peptide detectable in 5/9 patients tested. This region contains an epitope (NY-ESO-1157–170) that has previously been characterized for Teff [35], raising the possibility that Treg could be responding to the same epitope. To address this possibility, two patients (102 and 103) were identified who had responses to the NY-ESO-1157–174 peptide in both the Treg and Teff subsets, and the ability of these cells to respond to the published epitope (NY-ESO-1157–170) or various truncation or extension variants, was assessed. As shown in Figure 5, both Treg (left panels) and Teff (right panels) responded to the NY-ESO-1157–170 peptide. Truncation of either 1 or 2 aa from the N-terminus, or 1 aa from the C-terminus, had little effect on these responses. However, both populations showed greatly reduced responsiveness following truncation of 2 aa from the C-terminus (peptide NY-ESO-1157–168). Similarly, extension of the core sequence by 1 aa at either the C or N terminus also reduced responsiveness within both populations.

Figure 5
Treg and Teff respond to an identical HLA-DP4-restricted epitope in the region NY-ESO-1157–170.

The previously described NY-ESO-1157–170 epitope has been shown to be restricted by the HLA-DP4 class II allele [35], and molecular typing revealed that the patients tested in Figure 5 expressed the HLA-DPB1*0401 molecule. To confirm that Tregs also responded to this epitope when it was presented on HLA-DP4, a panel of EBV-transformed B cell lines (BCL) was pulsed with the NY-ESO-1157–170 peptide, washed and tested for the ability to induce CD3 down-regulation in Treg and Teff cells (Fig 5E–F). A BCL lacking DP4 expression (9902) failed to induce CD3 down-regulation in either population, whereas a BCL expressing HLA-DPB1*0401 (line 9004) induced a significant response in both populations. Thus, the NY-ESO-1157–170 peptide is presented to both Treg and Teff on HLA-DP4.

Together, these results suggest that the minimum sequence of the previously described NY-ESO-1157–170 epitope [35] could be revised to NY-ESO-1159–170, or possibly even to NY-ESO-1159–169, although this exact peptide was not tested in our assays. More importantly, however, the data demonstrate that Treg and Teff respond to exactly the same epitope, and in both cases, this response is restricted by HLA-DP4.

NY-ESO-1-specific Treg are prevalent within tumor tissue

To determine if NY-ESO-1-specific Treg can be detected within the tumor as well as the blood, fresh tumor tissue was obtained from Patient 126 after three rounds of vaccination with NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIXTM and a single cell suspension generated. The resulting mixture of tumor cells and stromal cells, including TIL, was cultured in the presence of high-dose IL-2 but without the addition of any exogenous peptide, antigen or mitogen. Expanded TIL were stimulated overnight with peptides NY-ESO-185–102 and NY-ESO-1115–132 (both of which induced responses in peripheral blood Treg from this patient) and assessed for CD3 down-regulation. In addition, a sample of the tumor digest was analyzed by flow cytometry prior to culture, which revealed that 41.1% of CD4+ T cells within the tumor had a Treg phenotype, representing an approximate 10-fold enrichment over frequencies in the blood (not shown).

Peptide NY-ESO-185–102 failed to stimulate any reproducible responses by either Treg or Teff within TIL. On the other hand, peptide NY-ESO-1115–132 induced a readily detectable response by Teff cells within the expanded TIL (Fig 6A). Strikingly, the magnitude of response to the same peptide was ~4-fold higher within the Treg population, with >40% of Treg down-regulating CD3 in response to this peptide. To demonstrate the reproducibility of this difference, three independent TIL lines were generated from frozen aliquots of the same tumor specimen, and each line tested 1–3 times. In each analysis, the proportion of cells responding to the NY-ESO-1115–132 peptide was always higher within the Treg population than the Teff population, with a mean fold difference of 3.1 (Fig 6B). Pre-incubation with a blocking antibody to HLA-DR almost completely inhibited both the Treg and Teff responses to this peptide, whereas blocking antibodies to HLA-DP or HLA-DQ had no effect, indicating that the response within both populations was restricted by HLA-DR (Fig 6C).

Figure 6
Tumor tissue contains populations of NY-ESO-1-specific Treg and Teff.

In Figure 2, we demonstrated that bulk Treg isolated from 21-day cultures suppressed the proliferation of CD8+ T cells. However, it was also of interest to confirm that NY-ESO-1-specific Treg had a similar activity. Expanded TIL from Patient 126 were stimulated with NY-ESO-1115–132 peptide overnight to induce CD3 down-regulation and the peptide-specific Treg were subsequently sorted on the basis of a CD4+ CD25+ CD127 CD3low phenotype and tested in a suppression assay. These cells suppressed proliferation of anti-CD3-stimulated CD8+ T cells from a healthy donor to a similar extent as bulk Treg isolated from a healthy donor (Fig 6D). Interestingly, CD3hi Tregs sorted from the TIL line (i.e., Treg which had failed to respond to peptide stimulation) also suppressed CD8+ T cell proliferation, suggesting that recent antigen stimulation was not essential for the acquisition of suppressor function by these cells. Possibly, the presence of tumor cells during establishment of the TIL line activated Tregs specific to a wide variety of tumor antigenic epitopes, and this activated state was maintained during expansion, thus enabling Treg with a variety of antigen specificities to exert suppressive activity.

Together, these results demonstrate that tumor tissue from Patient 126 contains a prominent population of Treg specific for an HLA-DR-restricted epitope within the NY-ESO-1115–132 peptide. Moreover, Treg specific for this epitope can suppress CD8+ T cell proliferation and are therefore fully functional. Immunohistochemistry staining of the tumour tissue revealed that tumour cells still expressed high levels of NY-ESO-1 at this time (data not shown), suggesting that tissue-resident NY-ESO-1-specific Treg may be activated locally.


In the present study, we have utilized a novel approach that allows the unbiased identification of Treg specific to any epitope within a given tumor antigen. We demonstrate that NY-ESO-1-specific Treg are very common in the blood of patients with late-stage melanoma, as they were detectable in 9/9 patients tested. Moreover, in six of these nine patients, the NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIXTM vaccine either induced at least one new response that was not detectable prior to vaccination or boosted the pre-existing responses.

Due to the scarcity of tumour antigen-specific T cells (including Treg) in the blood, it was necessary to expand these cells in vitro with antigen. This culture step may have induced a temporary up-regulation of FoxP3 and CD25 on Teff cells, as has been reported previously [27][30], and these cells could theoretically have been mistaken for Treg. However, several lines of evidence strongly suggest that this is not the case. First, these cells suppressed the proliferation of CD8+ T cells, when assessed as either a bulk population (Fig 2) or isolated according to NY-ESO-1 specificity (Fig 6). Second, they expressed low to undetectable levels of CD127 expression. Third, they up-regulated LAP upon activation with cognate peptide. Finally, the Treg and Teff populations in individual patients sometimes recognized distinct epitopes (such as in the example shown in Figure 1), providing evidence that these are discrete populations, and the Treg were not simply generated by conversion from Teff recognizing the same epitope. Our conclusion that CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ cells present in 21-day cultures are Treg and not activated Teff is in agreement with previous studies showing that the acquisition of these markers by Teff is temporary, and expression is largely lost by day 10 of culture [12], [27], [28], [30]. Of note, two previous studies have also identified NY-ESO-1-specific Treg in the blood of melanoma patients using alternative approaches, further supporting our findings [12], [24].

The Treg responses detected in our study span a large portion of the NY-ESO-1 protein. Although detailed characterization of each of these epitopes is beyond the scope of this study, we could confirm that the frequently detected Treg response to the 18mer peptide NY-ESO-1157–174 was due to recognition of the previously described DP4-restricted immunodominant NY-ESO-1157–170 epitope. Thus, we have shown conclusively that Treg and Teff can recognize the exact same minimum epitope presented on the same HLA allele. This in turn suggests that human Treg and Teff share at least partially overlapping TCR repertoires, which is in agreement with previous studies in humans [36] and mice [37]. On the other hand, one of the Treg responses detected here (within the region NY-ESO-149–72) does not contain any previously described Teff epitopes (see and this response was not detected within the Teff population in this patient (data not shown). Thus, this specificity may be unique to the Treg population.

It is still a matter of debate whether Treg mediate their suppressive effects primarily in the secondary lymphoid organs, at local sites in the periphery (such as tumor tissue) or, more likely, a combination of both. For practical reasons, we have assessed NY-ESO-1-specific Treg responses predominantly in the blood, which should reflect the cells circulating through secondary lymphoid organs. However, for Patient 126, we could additionally obtain fresh tumor tissue and demonstrate that Treg specific for an HLA-DR-restricted epitope within peptide NY-ESO-1115–132 were not only present within the blood but were also present at high frequency within the tumor. These NY-ESO-1115–132-specific Treg were fully functional, as they suppressed CD8+ T cell proliferation. Considering that Patient 126 expresses the HLA-DRB1*04 allele, this response is likely to be directed toward the previously described DR4-restricted NY-ESO-1121–130 epitope [34]. The frequency of these Treg was remarkably high, suggesting that local anti-tumour immunity would be severely compromised in this patient.

The potential of cancer vaccines to expand not only desirable Teff populations, but also inhibitory Treg, has important implications for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer patients may be particularly predisposed to developing Treg responses, since the proportion of Treg in the blood is significantly increased above normal for a wide range of cancers [38], [39]. Furthermore, we [4] and others [40] have shown that patients with advanced melanoma have a significantly higher frequency of Treg in the blood compared to those with fully resected disease. In the present study, we have demonstrated that the NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIXTM vaccine expands NY-ESO-1-specific Treg in the majority of patients with advanced melanoma. However, it is quite possible that patients with fully resected disease, who have a lower proportion of circulating Treg [4], would be less likely to develop NY-ESO-1-specific Treg responses following vaccination. We are currently testing this hypothesis.

In keeping with our findings, two other clinical studies have shown that tumour antigen-specific Treg can be expanded by cancer vaccines targeting either MAGE-A3 [10] or papillomavirus [14]. In contrast to these reports, two further studies failed to detect an expansion of Treg in response to vaccination [11], [41]. It is likely that the effects of cancer vaccines on tumor antigen-specific Treg vary depending on the vaccinating antigen and the nature and stage of the cancer. Further studies using systematic screening approaches such as that used here are required to fully understand the effect of these and other variables.

Together, our results demonstrate that Treg specific for a range of NY-ESO-1 epitopes are present in both the blood and tumor tissue of patients with advanced melanoma and that vaccination against NY-ESO-1 frequently expands these cells. Thus, it may be important to modify future cancer vaccine approaches, for example, by co-administration of sub-therapeutic doses of the chemotherapeutic drug cyclophosphamide, which has been shown to result in selective depletion of Treg [42]. We are currently assessing whether this approach can deplete Treg and improve responses to the NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIXTM vaccine in patients with advanced melanoma. In addition, our results highlight the importance of assessing the effect of vaccination on Treg and not just Teff, in order to fully understand the immune responses (both effector and regulatory) elicited by vaccination.

Materials and Methods

Patients and vaccine

The study population and vaccine are described in detail elsewhere [4]. Briefly, all patients had histologically confirmed stage IV (metastatic) or unresectable stage III malignant melanoma. All studies were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of Austin Health and the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and patients provided written informed consent.

Peptides, antibodies and dyes for flow cytometry

Peptides were synthesized by the Department of Chemistry, Auckland University, New Zealand) and Chiron Mimotopes. Antibodies for flow cytometry specific to CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25 and CD127 were from BD Biosciences. Anti-LAP was from R&D Systems while anti-FoxP3 (clone 236A/E7) was from eBioscience. Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and Live/Dead vital dyes for flow cytometry were from Invitrogen. Anti-CD3 (clone OKT3) used for T cell stimulation was from eBioscience. Pan anti-HLA-DR (L243), anti-HLA-DP (B7/21), and anti-HLA-DQ (SPV-L3) neutralizing antibodies were used as culture supernatants [43].

Flow cytometry and cell sorting

Flow cytometry was performed using a BD FACSCanto II and data was analyzed using FlowJo. ‘Live/Dead’ vital dye was used according to the manufacturer's recommendations to gate out dead cells from analyses. Cell sorting was performed using a BD FACSAria III Cell Sorter.

Preparation and culture of cell lines, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL)

Culture medium used throughout was RPMI-1640 supplemented with 2 mM Glutamax, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 10 mM HEPES, 1mM sodium pyruvate, 100 μM non-essential amino acids and 50 μM 2-Merceptoethanol (Invitrogen). For culture of PBMC and TIL, human serum pooled from several healthy donors (Australian Red Cross) was added to 10% to generate complete ‘RH-10’ medium. Alternatively, fetal calf serum (FCS; Invitrogen) was added to 10% to generate complete ‘RF-10’ medium for other cell lines.

PBMC were isolated from blood by Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation (Amersham) and cryopreserved in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) until required. Healthy donor PBMCs were obtained from the Australian Red Cross. To generate TIL lines, fresh tumor tissue was rinsed to remove blood cells and then dissociated by mincing and digestion in Collagenase III (1 mg/ml) and DNase I (50 U/ml) at 37°C for 1.5 hr, then cultured in RH-10 supplemented with 300 U/ml IL-2 (‘Proleukin’; Prometheus). EBV-transformed B cell lines (BCL) 9022, 9004 and 9072 were made available from the 10th International HLA Workshop (New York).

Detection of antigen-specific responses using CD3 down-regulation

The method is described in detail elsewhere [20]. Briefly, PBMC were incubated with a pool of 28 18mer peptides for 1 hour at 37°C. Cultures were then diluted ~10-fold with RH-10 containing 300 U/mL IL-2 and incubated at 37°C for 21 days, and then re-stimulated overnight (16 – 24 hr) with peptide (at 10−4M unless otherwise indicated), followed by staining for CD3, CD4, CD25 and FoxP3 using the FoxP3 buffer set from eBioscience. In some experiments, instead of adding peptide directly to the culture, BCL were loaded with 10−6M peptide for 60 minutes at 37°C and then washed. The peptide-pulsed BCL were mixed with an equal number of cultured PBMC, incubated overnight and stained for flow cytometry as usual. To determine broad HLA restriction, hybridoma supernatant containing neutralizing anti-HLA antibodies was added to PBMC cultures at a 1/10 dilution and incubated at RT for 30 minutes prior to addition of peptide.

Suppression Assay

Treg were sorted on the basis of a CD3+ CD4+ CD25+ CD127 phenotype. For some experiments (Fig 6), Treg were stimulated overnight prior to sorting with 1×10−6M peptide NY-ESO-1115–132 and additionally sorted on the basis of a CD3hi or CD3lo phenotype. Sorted Treg were mixed at the indicated ratios with healthy donor derived CD8+ T cells labeled with CFSE and pre-stimulated with plate bound anti-CD3 (1–5μg/ml). Assays were cultured for 4 days before assessing the proportion of divided CD8+ T cells, as determined by CFSE dye dilution. In initial experiments (Fig 2), peptide-pulsed BCL generated from the same patient were also added as a source of APC. Suppression was calculated according to the formula: 100×(100-[% divided ‘test’/% divided ‘responders only’]), as described [44].

Supporting Information

Figure S1



The authors are grateful to Roleen Lata for cell sorting expertise.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Cancer Council Victoria grants to LE (603103, 433626), a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grant to WC (433608) and Operational Infrastructure Support of the Victorian State Government. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Nicholaou T, Ebert L, Davis ID, Robson N, Klein O, et al. (2006) Directions in the immune targeting of cancer: lessons learned from the cancer-testis Ag NY-ESO-1. Immunol Cell Biol 84: 303–317 [PubMed]
2. Maraskovsky E, Sjolander S, Drane DP, Schnurr M, Le TT, et al. (2004) NY-ESO-1 protein formulated in ISCOMATRIX adjuvant is a potent anticancer vaccine inducing both humoral and CD8+ T-cell-mediated immunity and protection against NY-ESO-1+ tumors. Clin Cancer Res 10: 2879–2890 [PubMed]
3. Davis ID, Chen W, Jackson H, Parente P, Shackleton M, et al. (2004) Recombinant NY-ESO-1 protein with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant induces broad integrated antibody and CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 10697–10702 [PubMed]
4. Nicholaou T, Ebert LM, Davis ID, McArthur GA, Jackson H, et al. (2009) Regulatory T-cell-mediated attenuation of T-cell responses to the NY-ESO-1 ISCOMATRIX vaccine in patients with advanced malignant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 15: 2166–2173 [PubMed]
5. Chen Q, Jackson H, Parente P, Luke T, Rizkalla M, et al. (2004) Immunodominant CD4+ responses identified in a patient vaccinated with full-length NY-ESO-1 formulated with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 9363–9368 [PubMed]
6. Eggermont AM (2009) Immunotherapy: Vaccine trials in melanoma time for reflection. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6: 256–258 [PubMed]
7. Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Restifo NP (2004) Cancer immunotherapy: moving beyond current vaccines. Nat Med 10: 909–915 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Sakaguchi S, Yamaguchi T, Nomura T, Ono M (2008) Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 133: 775–787 [PubMed]
9. Nishikawa H, Sakaguchi S (2010) Regulatory T cells in tumor immunity. Int J Cancer 127: 759–767 [PubMed]
10. Francois V, Ottaviani S, Renkvist N, Stockis J, Schuler G, et al. (2009) The CD4(+) T-cell response of melanoma patients to a MAGE-A3 peptide vaccine involves potential regulatory T cells. Cancer Res 69: 4335–4345 [PubMed]
11. Jandus C, Bioley G, Dojcinovic D, Derre L, Baitsch L, et al. (2009) Tumor antigen-specific FOXP3+ CD4 T cells identified in human metastatic melanoma: peptide vaccination results in selective expansion of Th1-like counterparts. Cancer Res 69: 8085–8093 [PubMed]
12. Vence L, Palucka AK, Fay JW, Ito T, Liu YJ, et al. (2007) Circulating tumor antigen-specific regulatory T cells in patients with metastatic melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 20884–20889 [PubMed]
13. van der Burg SH, Piersma SJ, de Jong A, van der Hulst JM, Kwappenberg KM, et al. (2007) Association of cervical cancer with the presence of CD4+ regulatory T cells specific for human papillomavirus antigens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 12087–12092 [PubMed]
14. Welters MJ, Kenter GG, Piersma SJ, Vloon AP, Lowik MJ, et al. (2008) Induction of tumor-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell immunity in cervical cancer patients by a human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 long peptides vaccine. Clin Cancer Res 14: 178–187 [PubMed]
15. Bonertz A, Weitz J, Pietsch DH, Rahbari NN, Schlude C, et al. (2009) Antigen-specific Tregs control T cell responses against a limited repertoire of tumor antigens in patients with colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Invest 119: 3311–3321 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Lehe C, Ghebeh H, Al-Sulaiman A, Al Qudaihi G, Al-Hussein K, et al. (2008) The Wilms' tumor antigen is a novel target for human CD4+ regulatory T cells: implications for immunotherapy. Cancer Res 68: 6350–6359 [PubMed]
17. Baecher-Allan C, Brown JA, Freeman GJ, Hafler DA (2001) CD4+CD25high regulatory cells in human peripheral blood. J Immunol 167: 1245–1253 [PubMed]
18. Godfrey WR, Spoden DJ, Ge YG, Baker SR, Liu B, et al. (2005) Cord blood CD4(+)CD25(+)-derived T regulatory cell lines express FoxP3 protein and manifest potent suppressor function. Blood 105: 750–758 [PubMed]
19. Levings MK, Sangregorio R, Sartirana C, Moschin AL, Battaglia M, et al. (2002) Human CD25+CD4+ T suppressor cell clones produce transforming growth factor beta, but not interleukin 10, and are distinct from type 1 T regulatory cells. J Exp Med 196: 1335–1346 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Ebert LM, Macraild SE, Davis I, Cebon J, Chen W (2012) A novel method for detecting antigen-specific human regulatory T cells. J Immunol Methods DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.01.004. [PubMed]
21. Valitutti S, Muller S, Salio M, Lanzavecchia A (1997) Degradation of T cell receptor (TCR)-CD3-zeta complexes after antigenic stimulation. J Exp Med 185: 1859–1864 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Liu H, Rhodes M, Wiest DL, Vignali DA (2000) On the dynamics of TCR: CD3 complex cell surface expression and downmodulation. Immunity 13: 665–675 [PubMed]
23. Jackson HM, Dimopoulos N, Chen Q, Luke T, Yee Tai T, et al. (2004) A robust human T-cell culture method suitable for monitoring CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell responses from cancer clinical trial samples. J Immunol Methods 291: 51–62 [PubMed]
24. Fourcade J, Sun Z, Kudela P, Janjic B, Kirkwood JM, et al. (2010) Human tumor antigen-specific helper and regulatory T cells share common epitope specificity but exhibit distinct T cell repertoire. J Immunol 184: 6709–6718 [PubMed]
25. Wang HY, Lee DA, Peng G, Guo Z, Li Y, et al. (2004) Tumor-specific human CD4+ regulatory T cells and their ligands: implications for immunotherapy. Immunity 20: 107–118 [PubMed]
26. Wang HY, Peng G, Guo Z, Shevach EM, Wang RF (2005) Recognition of a new ARTC1 peptide ligand uniquely expressed in tumor cells by antigen-specific CD4+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol 174: 2661–2670 [PubMed]
27. Allan SE, Crome SQ, Crellin NK, Passerini L, Steiner TS, et al. (2007) Activation-induced FOXP3 in human T effector cells does not suppress proliferation or cytokine production. Int Immunol 19: 345–354 [PubMed]
28. Gavin MA, Torgerson TR, Houston E, DeRoos P, Ho WY, et al. (2006) Single-cell analysis of normal and FOXP3-mutant human T cells: FOXP3 expression without regulatory T cell development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 6659–6664 [PubMed]
29. Walker MR, Kasprowicz DJ, Gersuk VH, Benard A, Van Landeghen M, et al. (2003) Induction of FoxP3 and acquisition of T regulatory activity by stimulated human CD4+CD25- T cells. J Clin Invest 112: 1437–1443 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Pillai V, Ortega SB, Wang CK, Karandikar NJ (2007) Transient regulatory T-cells: a state attained by all activated human T-cells. Clin Immunol 123: 18–29 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Liu W, Putnam AL, Xu-Yu Z, Szot GL, Lee MR, et al. (2006) CD127 expression inversely correlates with FoxP3 and suppressive function of human CD4(+) T reg cells. J Exp Med 203: 1701–1711 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Seddiki N, Santner-Nanan B, Martinson J, Zaunders J, Sasson S, et al. (2006) Expression of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-7 receptors discriminates between human regulatory and activated T cells. J Exp Med 203: 1693–1700 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Tran DQ, Andersson J, Hardwick D, Bebris L, Illei GG, et al. (2009) Selective expression of latency-associated peptide (LAP) and IL-1 receptor type I/II (CD121a/CD121b) on activated human FOXP3+ regulatory T cells allows for their purification from expansion cultures. Blood 113: 5125–5133 [PubMed]
34. Zeng G, Touloukian CE, Wang X, Restifo NP, Rosenberg SA, et al. (2000) Identification of CD4+ T cell epitopes from NY-ESO-1 presented by HLA-DR molecules. J Immunol 165: 1153–1159 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Zeng G, Wang X, Robbins PF, Rosenberg SA, Wang RF (2001) CD4(+) T cell recognition of MHC class II-restricted epitopes from NY-ESO-1 presented by a prevalent HLA DP4 allele: association with NY-ESO-1 antibody production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 3964–3969 [PubMed]
36. Fazilleau N, Bachelez H, Gougeon ML, Viguier M (2007) Cutting edge: size and diversity of CD4+CD25high Foxp3+ regulatory T cell repertoire in humans: evidence for similarities and partial overlapping with CD4+CD25- T cells. J Immunol 179: 3412–3416 [PubMed]
37. Hsieh CS, Liang Y, Tyznik AJ, Self SG, Liggitt D, et al. (2004) Recognition of the peripheral self by naturally arising CD25+ CD4+ T cell receptors. Immunity 21: 267–277 [PubMed]
38. Betts GJ, Clarke SL, Richards HE, Godkin AJ, Gallimore AM (2006) Regulating the immune response to tumours. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58: 948–961 [PubMed]
39. Beyer M, Schultze JL (2006) Regulatory T cells in cancer. Blood 108: 804–811 [PubMed]
40. Correll A, Tuettenberg A, Becker C, Jonuleit H (2010) Increased regulatory T-cell frequencies in patients with advanced melanoma correlate with a generally impaired T-cell responsiveness and are restored after dendritic cell-based vaccination. Exp Dermatol 19: e213–221 [PubMed]
41. Ayyoub M, Dojcinovic D, Pignon P, Raimbaud I, Schmidt J, et al. (2010) Monitoring of NY-ESO-1 specific CD4+ T cells using molecularly defined MHC class II/His-tag-peptide tetramers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 7437–7442 [PubMed]
42. Ghiringhelli F, Menard C, Puig PE, Ladoire S, Roux S, et al. (2007) Metronomic cyclophosphamide regimen selectively depletes CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and restores T and NK effector functions in end stage cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother 56: 641–648 [PubMed]
43. Robbins PA, Evans EL, Ding AH, Warner NL, Brodsky FM (1987) Monoclonal antibodies that distinguish between class II antigens (HLA-DP, DQ, and DR) in 14 haplotypes. Hum Immunol 18: 301–313 [PubMed]
44. Venken K, Thewissen M, Hellings N, Somers V, Hensen K, et al. (2007) A CFSE based assay for measuring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell mediated suppression of auto-antigen specific and polyclonal T cell responses. J Immunol Methods 322: 1–11 [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science