Neuropeptides are an attractive system in which to utilize chaperone effects in order to remedy protein misfolding in a variety of disorders (for reviews, see
Arakawa et al., 2006;
Fan and Ishii 2007;
Parenti 2009). We wanted to test this approach utilizing a robust and molecularly well-defined system that could easily visualize the administration and distribution of various peptides to an
in vitro hippocampal slice culture system. We decided to use luminescent nanoparticles in order to track peptide delivery, and observed that the nanoparticles themselves could be modified in order to target the peptides specifically to neurons.
The small (10 nm) size and unique spectral properties of CdSe/ZnS core/shell luminescent semiconductor nanocrystals make them attractive delivery vehicles for drugs and the visualization of cellular structures and processes (
Mihrimah 2004;
Emerich and Thanos 2006;
Hild et al., 2008;
Delehanty et al., 2009;
Algar et al., 2011). There is also some evidence that the coating on the nanoparticle can affect the fate of the particle in that carboxy groups increase leukocyte adherence and migration whereas amino groups and PEG [poly(ethylene glycol)] do not (
Rehberg et al., 2010) and an RGD sequence can target QDs (quantum dots) to tumours (
Smith et al., 2008). Based on the idea that the surface chemistry of QDs can affect their
in vivo fate (
Smith et al., 2008) we therefore tested different coatings for drug delivery to the CNS (central nervous system) in a model of brain tissue
in vitro, the hippocampal slice culture, where individual cells can be easily identified and microenvironmental conditions are well controlled (
Kunkler and Kraig 1997;
Mitchell et al., 2010;
Grinberg et al., 2011).
There are three general ways of targeting QDs to cells (
Delehanty et al., 2009,
2010). Passive delivery primarily relies on intrinsic properties between the QD and cell to mediate uptake, such as surface functionalization and charge, and therefore lacks the specificity necessary for a more targeted approach required by most medical applications (
Delehanty et al., 2009). Active delivery, such as electroporation, while invaluable to basic research, is much too invasive for translation to treatment (
Delehanty et al., 2009). The third, facilitated delivery, wherein a delivery agent is conjugated to the QD in order to assist in uptake, offers the best possibility for true medical applications to emerge (
Delehanty et al., 2010). Two areas are of primary importance in regards to facilitated delivery, namely escaping the endolysosomal system and selective delivery to intracellular compartments (
Delehanty et al., 2006).
We have previously shown that PEGylated () QDs functionalized with a polyarginine ‘Tat-like’ CPP (cell-penetrating peptide) can be specifically delivered to cells via endocytic uptake with no adverse effects on cellular proliferation (
Delehanty et al., 2006), but remain sequestered within acidic endolysosomal vesicles for at least 3 days after initial uptake (
Delehanty et al., 2010). During this time the CPP mostly remains stably associated with the QD rather than being delivered directly to the cytosol through endosomal escape (
Delehanty et al., 2010). To overcome this problem
Sugahara et al. (2010) co-administered a tumour-penetrating peptide in order to allow drugs to penetrate into extravascular tumour tissue without the drug being chemically conjugated to the peptide. However, although co-injection with the peptide improved the therapeutic index of drugs, there was no evidence of endosomal cargo escape. We overcame this delivery and subsequent release problem by using an amphiphilic peptide (Palm1, AcWG(Pal)VKIKKP
9GGH
6, ) designed to both mediate cell penetration and vesicle membrane interaction (
Delehanty et al., 2010). This peptide exhibited rapid QD uptake by endocytosis followed by a slower, efficient endosomal release peaking at 48 h in a number of different cell lines. Importantly, this QD-peptide bioconjugate elicited minimal cytotoxicity in the cell lines tested.
In order to extend the usefulness of such QDs we varied the coating and peptide/QD ratio and tested them for cell-type specificity and subcellular distribution in a differentiating rat hippocampal slice culture system. Previous studies using QDs have largely failed to show selective cell targeting, although two recent studies have shown selective targeting of streptavidin-coated QDs to microglia (
Minami et al., 2012) and atheronol-B analogue-coated QDs to macrophages (
Prapainop et al., 2012). More promising has been a report that nanoparticles coated with polysorbate 80 could transport an analgesic peptide across the blood–brain barrier after intranasal administration (
Ruan et al., 2012). Our goal was to target the QD–peptide to neurons while minimizing distribution elsewhere, using a hippocampal slice culture model system. We find that a negatively heterocharged polyampholyte coating, designated CL4 (compact ligand) (
Susumu et al., 2011), exhibits robust targeting to neurons in these slices with little to no uptake by astrocytes, microglia or oligodendrocytes. Additionally, we confirm evidence of endosomal escape due to the Palm1 peptide, shown previously only in HEK-293 cells (human embryonic kidney 293 cells), in a much more complex hippocampal slice culture system.