Silicon plays important roles in biology, but at the molecular level, very little is known about how cellular components recognize, interact with, and process this element. By silicon, in dissolved form, we mean silicic acid [Si(OH)
4, and in solid form, silica [SiO
2. Silicon’s biological roles include essentiality in the formation of bones and connective tissue in vertebrates
[
1,
2], a beneficial, and possibly essential role in plants for optimal productivity and increased disease resistance
[
3], and as a structural material in the cell walls of plants and single-celled protists
[
3,
4]. The most abundant silicifying organisms on the planet are unicellular microalgae called diatoms, which make silica-based cell walls, and which can readily deplete their environment for trace amounts of silicon. Diatoms have demonstrated cellular responses to the depletion or re-addition of silicon. For most diatoms, under silicon depletion the cell cycle arrests and under subsequent silicon replenishment, the cell cycle progresses, cellular growth and division processes are stimulated, and new cell walls are synthesized
[
5]. From the available data
[
6], silicon is not tightly tied into other aspects of cellular metabolism, although given the paucity of appropriate studies, this should be considered with caution. However, based on our current understanding, it is clear that the three major cellular processes affected by or involving silicon are the cell cycle, silicon transport, and cell wall synthesis.
Mechanisms triggering cell cycle arrest or progression upon silicon starvation or addition remain unknown, but probably involve signaling processes that result in control over cell cycle-related genes. Additionally, it has been suggested that the ecological success of diatoms is due to their ability to recover quickly from silicon starvation, which allows them to outcompete other species during blooms
[
7]. How diatoms can rapidly recover and resume the cell cycle and growth after a starvation period remains unclear. Nearly all diatoms exhibit a dependence on silicon for cell cycle progression, and limitation for silicon will arrest the cell cycle at particular stages, which can vary depending on the species
[
8]. Oftentimes, the majority of cells in a culture arrest at the same stage, and upon silicon replenishment, they progress synchronously through the cell cycle, which enables characterization of cell cycle-related processes
[
5]. Synchronization allows for enrichment of genes and proteins induced during these processes, enabling their identification and characterization
[
9].
A molecular interaction between silicon and diatom cellular components has been shown to occur during silicon transport. Silicic acid at low concentrations enters into the diatom cell via silicic acid transporters (SITs) which specifically recognize and transport silicic acid across lipid bilayer membranes
[
10,
11]. At higher concentrations, the small uncharged silicic acid molecule can diffuse across membranes
[
12]. The SITs were the first proteins shown to specifically interact with soluble silicon and not cause its precipitation
[
10], therefore they are models for understanding how other proteins may interact with silicon. The demonstration that the SITs interact with silicon opens the possibility that enzymes may also be able to do so, however to date, this has not been demonstrated. Some data suggested a direct effect of silicon on enzyme activity, specifically, DNA polymerase
[
13], but subsequent work using purified enzyme failed to demonstrate a direct effect on activity
[
14]. This suggests that the induction of DNA polymerase activity was a secondary effect stemming from induction of cell cycle progression after silicon replenishment. To date, no enzyme has been shown to have altered activity directly resulting from the presence or absence of silicon, although diatom carbonic anhydrases have been shown to use silica as a buffering agent
[
15].
Silicon’s role is better defined in terms of diatom cell wall synthesis. The diatom cell wall, called the frustule, is made of silica in a vast variety of species-specific shapes and structures (Figure

) on the nanometer to micrometer size scale
[
4,
16]. Cell wall formation occurs intracellularly in the silica deposition vesicle (SDV), in which the two major structural components of the wall, the valves and the girdle bands (Figure

), are made. After completion, these structures are exocytosed by an unknown mechanism
[
17] to form portions of the new cell wall. The intracellular origin of the SDV is poorly understood, and could involve both secretory and endocytotic processes
[
18], however specific components involved in trafficking are uncharacterized. Transport of silicification precursors into the SDV is also completely uncharacterized. The protein machinery involved in membrane dynamics for cell division including cytokinesis, SDV formation, and exocytosis remain unknown.
We have some understanding of silica structure formation from analysis of the organic components associated with the cell wall silica or SDV. After extensive cleaning of organic material from cell walls, followed by dissolution of the silica, two classes of proteins, the silaffins and silacidins, and long chain polyamines (LCPAs), were isolated (Figure

). These are apparently directly involved in the nanoscale silica polymerization process
[
19], but do not assemble the silica into the higher order structures characteristic of the cell wall. Proteins associated with the girdle bands called cingulins characterized in
T. pseudonana formed structures indicative of higher order organization
[
20]. It was suggested that chitin fibrils were involved in formation of the
T. pseudonana valve
[
21], which could relate to higher order structure formation. Insoluble organic matrices with silica polymerization activity were also described in the valves of other diatom species
[
20]. Microtubule and microfilament networks are tightly associated with the SDV, and observations suggest that microtubules are involved in its positioning and strengthening, and actin microfilaments are involved in the mesoscale patterning of silica, and microscale structure formation by defining the leading edge of the SDV
[
22,
23]. Actin and microtubules must assemble outside the SDV, and yet apparently influence the organization of components in the SDV lumen, which has been proposed to occur via SDV membrane-associated proteins that bridge the extra- and intra- components
[
24,
25]. Given the complexity of diatom silica structures on the nano- and meso-scale
[
4,
16] other unknown SDV-associated components are likely to be involved in the formation of substructures such as nanopores and large pores in the cell wall called portulae (Figure

). A rigorous characterization of the SDV proteome has not been possible, due to the inability to isolate a pure SDV fraction. An alternative way to characterize SDV components is to identify genes up-regulated during cell wall formation.
We developed a synchronized culture procedure for
T. pseudonana, based on recovery from silicon limitation that enabled identification of a distinctive cell cycle-specific transcriptional response for cell wall associated proteins such as the silaffins
[
5,
9]. This approach should be amenable to study other cellular responses to silicon. Two previous analyses of diatom whole transcriptome expression in response to silicon availability were performed
[
26,
27]. One study was done on
Phaeodactylum tricornutum, a diatom that does not require silicon for growth, and in several morphotypes, lacks a silicified wall
[
28]. The goal of that study was to investigate non-cell cycle related silicon processes, and cell wall synthesis was not evaluated. Thirteen genes were up-regulated under silicon-free medium and 210 were up-regulated in silicon-replete medium [26]. The other study, performed on
T. pseudonana, monitored transcript changes resulting from growth under two different silicon concentrations, including one in which growth was limited, but not arrested
[
27]. This study identified 159 genes up-regulated under the lower silicon condition, which were suggested to be involved in silica formation processes
[
27]. However, under silicon-limited conditions in
T. pseudonana cell division is decreased or ceases
[
5], thus up-regulation of silica formation related genes is unlikely. Supporting this concept is the fact that a gene previously shown to be diagnostic of cell wall synthesis, silaffin 3
[
9], was not present in this dataset
[
27]. Although the genes in this study
[
27] may have relevance for growth under low silicon conditions, they do not encompass a silicon starvation or cell cycle arrest response.
The synchrony approach developed for
T. pseudonana should allow evaluation of whole transcriptome responses for various silicon-related cellular processes. One process to be studied is cell wall synthesis, which has not been subject to a whole transcriptome analysis. Monitoring transcript changes may be especially valuable considering that many diatom cell wall synthesis genes are unlikely to have homologs in other organisms, and similarity to a diagnostic gene expression pattern may be the only approach to identifying them. The synchrony approach should allow evaluation of the silicon starvation response, which may provide insight into general aspects of cellular silicon metabolism, and how diatoms recover quickly from limitation. Nutrient starvation and replenishment commonly induces changes in expression of genes involved in metabolizing the limited nutrient
[
29], and thus other genes involved in silicon metabolism may be identified, as well as the basis of silicon-limited cell cycle arrest. Finally, because the SITs are definitively involved in silicon metabolism and responsible for silicon’s presence in the cell, they could serve as markers to identify other co-regulated genes that may also be involved in silicon transport or metabolism.
Here we use Affymetrix microarrays to evaluate the whole genome mRNA expression profile during synchronized cell cycle progression in T. pseudonana. We identified 485 genes significantly up-regulated during the period of valve formation, which are potentially involved in different aspects of the cell division/cell wall synthesis process. An additional 533 genes were significantly up-regulated during silicon starvation and thus, are potentially involved in the control of cell cycle progression in response to silicon availability. Twenty four genes were identified that exhibited co-regulation with SIT1 and SIT2. Analysis of the data has provided a wealth of new genes to investigate previously uncharacterized cellular phenomenon related to silicon metabolism, silicon’s interaction with cellular components, and environmental responses to silicon.