Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of cytotechspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice
Cytotechnology. 2006 March; 50(1-3): 9–33.
Published online 2006 June 20. doi:  10.1007/s10616-006-9005-8
PMCID: PMC3476006

Reactor Engineering in Large Scale Animal Cell Culture


This article mainly addresses the issues associated with the engineering of large-scale free suspension culture in agitated bioreactors >10,000 L because they have become the system of choice industrially. It is particularly concerned with problems that become increasingly important as the scale increases. However, very few papers have been written that are actually based on such large-scale studies and the few that do rarely address any of the issues quantitatively. Hence, it is necessary very often to extrapolate from small-scale work and this review tries to pull the two types of study together. It is shown that ‘shear sensitivity’ due to agitation and bursting bubbles is no longer considered a major problem. Homogeneity becomes increasingly important with respect to pH and nutrients at the largest scale and sub-surface feeding is recommended despite ‘cleaning in place’ concerns. There are still major questions with cell retention/recycle systems at these scales, either because of fouling, of capacity or of potential and different ‘shear sensitivity’ questions. Fed-batch operation gives rise to cell densities that have led to the use of oxygen and enriched air to meet oxygen demands. This strategy, in turn, gives rise to a CO2 evolution rate that impacts on pH control, pCO2 and osmolality. These interactions are difficult to resolve but if higher sparge and agitation intensities could be used to achieve the necessary oxygen transfer, the problem would largely disappear. Thus, the perception of ‘shear sensitivity’ is still impacting on the development of animal cell culture at the commercial scale. Microcarrier culture is also briefly addressed. Finally, some recommendations for bioreactor configuration and operating strategy are given.

Keywords: Large-scale bioreactors, ‘Shear sensitivity’, Homogeneity, pH control, Dissolved CO2, Osmolality


  • Amanullah A, Nienow AW, Buckland BC. Mixing in the fermentation and cell culture industries. In: Paul EL, Atiemo-Obeng VA, Kresta SM, editors. Handbook of industrial mixing; science and practice, ch. 18. N.Y: Wiley-Interscience; 2003. pp. 1071–1157.
  • Assirelli M, Bujalski W, Eaglesham A, Nienow AW. Intensifying micromixing in a semi-batch reactor using a Rushton turbine. Chem Eng Sci. 2005;60:2333–2339. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.10.041. [Cross Ref]
  • Aunins JG, Croughan MS, Wang DIC, Goldstein JM. Engineering developments in homogeneous culture of animal cells: oxygenation of reactors and scale up. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp. 1986;17:699–723.
  • Aunins JG, Glazomitsky K, Buckland BC (1993) Cell culture reactor design: known and unknown. In: Nienow AW (ed) Proc. 3rd int. conf. on bioreactor and bioprocess fluid dynamics. Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd., London, pp 175–190. ISBN 0 85298 873 7
  • Boon LA, Hoeks FWJMM, Lans RJM, Bujalski W, Wolff MO, Nienow AW. Comparing a range of impellers for “stirring as foam disruption”(SAFD) Biochem Eng J. 2002;10:183–195. doi: 10.1016/S1369-703X(01)00180-2. [Cross Ref]
  • Boraston R, Thompson PW, Garland S, Birch JR. Growth and oxygen requirements of antibody producing mouse hybridoma cells in suspension culture. Develop Biol Standard. 1984;55:103–111. [PubMed]
  • Boulton-Stone JM. The effect of surfactant on bursting gas bubbles. J Fluid Mech. 1995;302:231–257. doi: 10.1017/S0022112095004083. [Cross Ref]
  • Boulton-Stone JM, Blake JR. Gas bubbles bursting at a free surface. J Fluid Mech. 1993;254:103–111. doi: 10.1017/S0022112093002216. [Cross Ref]
  • Chalmers JJ, Bavarian F. Microscopic visualisation of insect cell-bubble interactions. ii: The bubble film and bubble rupture. Biotechnol Prog. 1991;7:151–158. doi: 10.1021/bp00008a010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cherry RS, Papoutsakis ET. Growth and death rates of bovine embryonic kidney cells in turbulent microcarrier bioreactors. Bioproc Eng. 1989;4:81–89. doi: 10.1007/BF00373735. [Cross Ref]
  • Chu L, Robinson DK. Industrial choices for protein production by large scale cell culture. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001;12:180–187. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00197-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Clark JM, Hirtenstein MD. Optimizing culture conditions for the production of animal cells in microcarrier culture. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1981;369:33–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb14175.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Croughan MS, Hamel JFP, Wang DIC. Hydrodynamic effects on animal cultures grown in microcarrier cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1987;29:130–141. doi: 10.1002/bit.260290117. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Croughan MS, Hamel JFP, Wang DIC. Effects of microcarrier concentration in animal cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988;32:975–982. doi: 10.1002/bit.260320805. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dey D (1998) Cell–bubble interactions during bubble disengagement in aerated bioreactors. PhD Thesis, The University of Birmingham, UK
  • Zengotita VM, Schmelzer AE, Miller WM. Characterisation of hybridoma cell responses to elevated pCO2 and osmolality: intracellular pH, cell size, apoptosis and metabolism. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;77:369–380. doi: 10.1002/bit.10176. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Enfors S-O, Nienow AW, et al. (2001) Physiological responses to mixing in large-scale bioreactors. J Biotechnol 85:175–185 [PubMed]
  • Garnier A, Voyer R, Tom R, Perret S, Jardin B, Kamen A. Dissolved carbon dioxide accumulation in a large scale and high density production of TGFβ receptor with baculovirus infected Sf-9 cells. Cytotechnology. 1996;22:53–63. doi: 10.1007/BF00353924. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gorenflo VM, Ritter JB, Aschllman DB, Druin H, Bowen BD, Piret JM. Characterisation and optimisation of acoustic filter performance by experimental design methodology. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;90:746–753. doi: 10.1002/bit.20476. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gray DR, Chen S, Howarth W, Inlow D, Maiorella BL. CO2 in large-scale and high-density CHO cell perfusion culture. Cytotechnology. 1996;22:65–78. doi: 10.1007/BF00353925. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Handa-Corrigan A, Emery AN, Spier RE. Effects of gas–liquid interfaces on the growth of suspended mammalian cells: mechanisms of cell damage by bubbles. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1989;11:230–235. doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(89)90097-5. [Cross Ref]
  • Hoeks, FWJMM, Khan M, Guter D, Willems M, Osman JJ, Mommers R, Wayte J (2004) Industrial applications of mixing and mass transfer studies. Alvin. W. Nienow’s Day; Stirred, Not Shaken Symposium, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  • Ibrahim S, Nienow AW. Particle suspension in the turbulent regime: the effect of impeller type and impeller/vessel configurations. Chem Eng Res Des (Trans I Chem E, Part A) 1996;74:679–688.
  • Ibrahim S, Nienow AW. The suspension of microcarriers for cell culture with axial flow impellers. Chem Eng Res Des (Trans I Chem E, Part A) 2004;82:1082–1088. doi: 10.1205/cerd.82.9.1082.44161. [Cross Ref]
  • Jöbses I, Martens D, Tramper JJ. Lethal events during gas sparging in animal cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1991;37:484–490. doi: 10.1002/bit.260370510. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kilburn DG, Webb FC. The cultivation of animal cells at controlled dissolved oxygen partial pressure. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1968;10:801–814. doi: 10.1002/bit.260100607. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kioukia N, Nienow AW, Al-Rubeai M, Emery AN. The impact of fluid dynamics on the biological performance of free suspension animal cell culture: further studies. Food Bioprod Proc (Trans I Chem E, Part C) 1992;70:143–148.
  • Kioukia N, Al-Rubeai M, Zhang Z, Emery AN, Nienow AW, Thomas CR. A study of uninfected and baculovirus-infected Spodoptera frugiperda cells in T- and spinner flasks. Biotech Lett. 1995;17:7–12. doi: 10.1007/BF00134187. [Cross Ref]
  • Kioukia N, Nienow AW, Al-Rubeai M, Emery AN. The influence of agitation and sparging on the growth rate and infection of insect cells in bioreactors and a comparison with hybridoma culture. Biotech Prog. 1996;12:779–785. doi: 10.1021/bp9600703. [Cross Ref]
  • Klopinger M, Fertig G, Fraune E, Miltenburger HG. Multi-stage production of Autographa californica nuclear polyhydrosis virus in insect cell bioreactors. Cytotechnology. 1990;4:271–278. doi: 10.1007/BF00563787. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kresta SM, Brodkey RS. Turbulence in mixing applications. In: Paul EL, Atiemo-Obeng VA, Kresta SM, editors. Handbook of industrial mixing; science and practice, ch. 2. N.Y: Wiley-Interscience; 2003. pp. 19–87.
  • Langheinrich C, Nienow AW, Eddleston T, Stevenson NC, Emery AN, Clayton TM, Slater NKH. Liquid homogenisation studies in animal cell bioreactors of up to 8 m3 in volume. Food Bioprod Proc (Trans I Chem E, Part C) 1998;76:107–116. doi: 10.1205/096030898531873. [Cross Ref]
  • Langheinrich C, Nienow AW. Control of pH in large scale, free suspension animal cell bioreactors: alkali addition and pH excursions. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999;66:171–179. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(1999)66:3<171::AID-BIT5>3.0.CO;2-T. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Langheinrich C, Nienow AW, Eddleston T, Stevenson NC, Emery AN, Clayton TM, Slater NKH. Oxygen transfer in stirred bioreactors under animal cell culture conditions. Food Bioproduct Proc (Trans I Chem E, Part C) 2002;80:39–44.
  • MacIntyre F. Flow patterns in breaking bubbles. J Fluid Mech. 1972;77:5211–5228.
  • Meier SJ, Hatton TA, Wang DIC. Cell death from bursting bubbles: role of cell attachment to rising bubbles in sparged reactors. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999;62:468–478. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19990220)62:4<468::AID-BIT10>3.0.CO;2-N. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Meier SJ. Cell culture scale-up: mixing, mass transfer, and use of appropriate scale-down models. Biochemical engineering XIV. Canada: Harrison Hot Springs; 2005.
  • Moran E (2004) Recombinant protein production from mammalian cell culture: technologies and scale-up. Biochemical Engineering Research Network (BERN) Meeting, University College Dublin
  • Mostafa SS, Gu X. Strategies for improved dCO2 removal in large-scale fed-batch cultures. Biotechnol Prog. 2003;19:45–51. doi: 10.1021/bp0256263. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Newitt DM, Dombrowski N, Knelman FH. Liquid entrainment. 1. The mechanism of drop formation from gas or vapour bubbles. Trans I Chem E. 1954;32:244–261.
  • Nienow AW, Lavery M. Oxygen transfer in animal cell culture medium. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1987;30:368–373. doi: 10.1002/bit.260300307. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nienow AW. Gas–liquid mixing studies: a comparison of Rushton turbines with some modern impellers. Chem Eng Res Des (Trans I Chem E, Part A) 1996;74:417–423.
  • Nienow AW, Langheinrich C, Stevenson NC, Emery AN, Clayton TM, Slater NKH. Homogenisation and oxygen transfer rates in large agitated and sparged animal cell bioreactors: some implications for growth and production. Cytotechnology. 1996;22:87–94. doi: 10.1007/BF00353927. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nienow AW (1997a) The mixer as a reactor — liquid/solid systems. In: Harnby N, Edwards MF, Nienow AW (eds) Mixing in the process industries, 2nd edn (paperback revision, chapter 17. Butterworth Heinemann, London, pp 394–411
  • Nienow AW (1997b) The suspension of solid particles. In: Harnby N, Edwards MF, Nienow AW (eds) Mixing in the process industries, 2nd edn (paperback revision), chapter 17. Butterworth Heinemann, London, pp 364–393
  • Nienow AW, Drain SM, Boyes AP, Carpenter KJ. An experimental study to characterise imperfect macromixing in a stirred semi-batch reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1997;36:2984–2989. doi: 10.1021/ie960618a. [Cross Ref]
  • Nienow AW (1998) Hydrodynamics of stirred bioreactors. In: Pohorecki R (ed) Fluid mechanics problems in biotechnology. App Mech Rev 51:3–2
  • Nienow AW, Chamsart S, Patel H, Hitchcock AG, Hanak JAJ (2000) The development of a cell lysis reactor of 60 litres capacity for plasmid DNA production for gene therapy AIChE Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, Nov., Paper 284 g
  • Nienow AW (2003) Aeration-biotechnology. In: Kirk Othmer encyclopaedia of chemical technology, 5th edn. Wiley, New York, published in the on-line edition of the Encyclopaedia on April 18th
  • Nienow AW, Bujalski W. The versatility of up-pumping hydrofoil agitators. Chem Eng Res Des (Trans I Chem E, Part A) 2004;82:1073–1081. doi: 10.1205/cerd.82.9.1073.44150. [Cross Ref]
  • Oh SKW, Nienow AW, Al-Rubeai M, Emery AN. The effect of agitation intensity with and without continuous sparging on the growth and antibody production of hybridoma cells. J Biotechnol. 1989;12:45–62. doi: 10.1016/0168-1656(89)90128-4. [Cross Ref]
  • Oh SKW, Nienow AW, Al-Rubeai M, Emery AN. Further studies of the culture of mouse hybridomas in an agitated bioreactor with and without continuous sparging. J Biotechnol. 1992;22:245–270. doi: 10.1016/0168-1656(92)90144-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Orton D, Wang DIC (1990) Effects of gas interfaces on animal cells in bubble aerated bioreactors. The 1990 Annual AIChE Meeting, Chicago, USA, Nov., paper 103b
  • Osman JJ, Birch J, Varley J. The response of GS-NSO myeloma cells to single and multiple ph perturbations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;79:398–407. doi: 10.1002/bit.10198. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ozturk SS. Engineering challenges in high-density cell culture systems. Cytotechnology. 1996;22:3–16. doi: 10.1007/BF00353919. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pullen KF, Johnson MD, Phillips AW, Ball GD, Finter NB. Very large-scale suspension cultures of mammalian cells. Dev Biol Std. 1985;60:175–185. [PubMed]
  • Radlett PJ, Telling RC, Whiteside JP, Maskell MA. The supply of oxygen to submerged cultures of BHK21 cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1972;34:437–445. doi: 10.1002/bit.260140312. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ramirez OT, Mutharasan R. The role of the plasma membrane fluidity on the shear sensitivity of hybridomas grown under hydrodynamic stress. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1990;36:911–920. doi: 10.1002/bit.260360906. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sinskey AJ, Fleischaker RJ, Tyo MA, Giard DJ, Wang DIC. Production of cell-derived products: virus and interferon. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1981;369:47–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb14176.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Telling RC, Elsworth R. Submerged culture of hamster kidney cells in a stainless steel vessel. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1965;7:417–434. doi: 10.1002/bit.260070309. [Cross Ref]
  • Telling RC, Elsworth R. Submerged culture of hamster kidney cells in a stainless steel vessel. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1965;7:417–434. doi: 10.1002/bit.260070309. [Cross Ref]
  • Tramper JJ, Joustra D, Vlak JM. Bioreactor design for growth of shear-sensitive insect cells. In: Webb C, Mavituna F, editors. Plant and animal cell cultures: process possibilities. Chichester UK: Ellis Horwood; 1987. pp. 125–136.
  • van Wezel AL (1985) Monolayer growth systems: homogeneous unit processes. In: Animal cell biotechnology. Academic Press Inc., London, pp 265–281
  • Van’t Riet K, Tramper J. Basic bioreactor design. N.Y: Marcel Dekker; 1991.
  • Varley J, Birch J. Reactor design for large-scale suspension animal cell culture. Cytotechnology. 1999;29:177–205. doi: 10.1023/A:1008008021481. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Voisard D, Meuly F, Ruffieux PA, Baer G, Kadouri A. Potential of cell retention techniques for large-scale high-density perfusion culture of suspended mammalian cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003;82:751–765. doi: 10.1002/bit.10629. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wayte J, Boraston R, Bland H, Varley J, Brown M. pH effects on growth and productivity of cell lines producing monoclonal antibody: control in large-scale fermentors. Cytotechnology. 1997;22:87–94.
  • Wu J. Mechanisms of animal cell damage associated with gas bubbles and cell protection by medium additives. J Biotechnol. 1995;43:81–94. doi: 10.1016/0168-1656(95)00133-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang Z, Al-Rubeai M, Thomas CR. Effect of Pluronic F68 on the mechanical properties of mammalian cells. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1992;14:980–983. doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(92)90081-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang Z, Ferenczi MA, Thomas CR. A micromanipulation technique with theoretical cell model for determining mechanical properties of single mammalian cells. Chem Eng Sci. 1992;47:1347–1354. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(92)80280-P. [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang Z, Thomas CR (1993) Modelling of animal cell damage in turbulent flows. In: Nienow AW (ed) Proc. 3rd int. conf. on bioreactor and bioprocess fluid dynamics. Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd., London, pp 475–282. ISBN 0 85298 873 7
  • Zhang Z, Al-Rubeai M, Thomas CR. Comparison of the fragilities of several cell lines. Biotechnol Tech. 1993;7:177–182. doi: 10.1007/BF02566144. [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang Z, Thomas CR (1996) Micromanipulation — a powerful technique for measuring cell mechanical strength. In: Microsystem technology for chemical and biological microreactors, DECHEMA Monographs, VCH, 132, 163–176, ISBN 3-527-10226-4

Articles from Cytotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.