Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
Sci Rep. 2012; 2: 748.
Published online 2012 October 19. doi:  10.1038/srep00748
PMCID: PMC3475990

Breaking the spatial resolution barrier via iterative sound-light interaction in deep tissue microscopy

Ke Si,1,2 Reto Fiolka,1,2 and Meng Cuia,1


Optical microscopy has so far been restricted to superficial layers, leaving many important biological questions unanswered. Random scattering causes the ballistic focus, which is conventionally used for image formation, to decay exponentially with depth. Optical imaging beyond the ballistic regime has been demonstrated by hybrid techniques that combine light with the deeper penetration capability of sound waves. Deep inside highly scattering media, the sound focus dimensions restrict the imaging resolutions. Here we show that by iteratively focusing light into an ultrasound focus via phase conjugation, we can fundamentally overcome this resolution barrier in deep tissues and at the same time increase the focus to background ratio. We demonstrate fluorescence microscopy beyond the ballistic regime of light with a threefold improved resolution and a fivefold increase in contrast. This development opens up practical high resolution fluorescence imaging in deep tissues.

Optical microscopy is an invaluable tool in the biological sciences1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 as it enables three-dimensional non-invasive in vivo imaging of the interior of cells and organisms with molecular specificity. Unfortunately optical methods are restricted to an imaging depth of a few scattering mean free path lengths9,10,11, a severe limitation in many research fields3,12,13. Recently hybrid techniques9,14,15,16,17,18,19 that combine the deep penetration capability of sound waves and the molecular contrast of light waves have greatly exceeded the depth limitation of pure optical methods. However, at these extended depths the achievable spatial resolution is restricted by the dimensions of the sound focus. Here we present an approach to fundamentally break the resolution limit of hybrid imaging technologies in deep tissue. Through iterative ultrasound guided optical phase conjugation (OPC), we shrink the sound light interaction volume and obtain a drastically sharper optical focus. This technology paves the way for deep-tissue fluorescence microscopy for biological research and medical applications.

The shallow optical penetration depth has restricted many research fields: it has forced biologists to use transparent model organisms, monolayer cell cultures or histological sections of tissue, just to name a few compromises. Consequently a lot of effort was dedicated to push the depth range in optical imaging11,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27 and recently substantial progress has been reported using hybrid approaches that combine light and sound4,9,17. Yet there is still a need for a technique that can take full advantage of the wealth of fluorescent labels and provide microscopic resolution at depths of 1 mm in tissues or deeper. For this goal, we need the ability to focus light tightly beyond the ballistic regime at arbitrary locations.

Recently, light focusing deep inside tissues was achieved using ultrasound guided optical phase conjugation14,15 and fluorescence imaging was demonstrated with NIR18 and visible19 excitation. An ultrasound focus, which experiences much less scattering than light, is used as a source of frequency shifted light that can be recorded and time-reversed using OPC. Similar to other hybrid techniques, however, the resolving power at large depths is determined by the size of the ultrasound focus, resulting in modest spatial resolutions of 30–50 microns18,19. Further the first demonstrations18,19 lacked sufficient contrast for practical biological imaging.

Here we demonstrate fluorescence microscopy beyond the ballistic regime with a lateral resolution of ~12 microns using iterative ultrasound guided digital OPC. We overcome the sound resolution limit by a factor of three and at the same time increase the focus to background ratio (FBR) fivefold. The principle behind our technique can be explained as follows: after traveling through highly scattering media, the incident light field at the ultrasound focus is completely randomized and unfocused. However, if the light was already pre-focused into the ultrasound focus using OPC, a much more confined sound-light interaction would occur.

Let us assume that the transverse profile of the sound modulation zone and hence the phase conjugation beam at the sound focus is defined as An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep00748-m1.jpg and that we employ two digital optical phase conjugation (DOPC) systems28, DOPC1 and DOPC2. DOPC1 first illuminates the sample and the sound modulated light is recorded by DOPC2, which is schematically shown in Fig. 1 a. DOPC2 then generates a phase conjugation beam that focuses back to the sound focus (Fig. 1 b). Different from the first illumination, the DOPC2 beam has a focused light distribution An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep00748-m2.jpg at the sound focus. Therefore the emerging sound modulated light has a new spatial profile An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep00748-m3.jpg. If we let the two DOPC systems take turns to illuminate the sample and to record the sound modulated light, we can achieve a focus profile An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep00748-m4.jpg, where N is the iteration number (Fig. 1 c–d ).

Figure 1
(a–d) Schematic illustration of the iterative focus improvement.(a) The initial incident light field (purple) propagates to the ultrasound focus (yellow circle). A simulated speckle pattern at the sound focus (location marked with the white arrows) ...

If we assume a Gaussian profile for An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep00748-m5.jpg and a strong optical focus (large FBR) for a single OPC operation, the transverse FWHM of the PSF decreases as An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep00748-m6.jpg. The FBR can be estimated by the number of independently controlled phase pixels Npixel of the SLM divided by the number of uncorrelated optical modes Nmode present in the ultrasound focus25,29. In a 2D approximation, the sound-light interaction area is reciprocally related to N and thus the FBR is expected to increase linearly with N. If the initial focus quality is low (FBR < 5), the dependence of FWHM and FBR on the number of iterations is more complicated. We use numerical simulations to investigate this regime, as described in the Supplementary discussion.

For fluorescence imaging, the ultrasound focus was raster scanned through the sample and at each position iterative DOPC was performed. The power of the fluorescence emission for each DOPC excitation was measured and the fluorescent background level was subtracted. The background signal was obtained by lateral translation of the DOPC phase pattern18,26,29 (30 pixels in z and y), which makes the phase conjugation ineffective.


To demonstrate the resolution increase using iterative DOPC, we measured the three-dimensional PSF of our system. To this end, we embedded 6 micron diameter fluorescence beads in a slice of Agar (200 microns thick) and sandwiched the slice between two tissue phantoms (scattering coefficient: 7.63 /mm, g factor: 0.9013) of 2 mm in thickness. The details of the sample preparations are included in the supplementary discussion.

Figure 2 a shows the lateral PSF for DOPC iteration 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9. Figure 2 b shows the axial PSF for iteration 1, 5, and 9. To determine the full width half maximum (FWHM), Gaussian fitting through cross-sections of each PSF was applied (Fig. 2 c–e). For iteration 1, when DOPC is applied for the first time, the mean FWHM of the PSF amounts to 35.7, 39.0 and 142 microns in the y, z and x (axial) direction, respectively (Fig. 2 f–g). After nine DOPC iterations, the FWHM was reduced to 11.2, 12.8, and 60.3 microns in the y, z, and x directions. The FBR is increased by a factor of ~5 over nine iterations and appears to grow almost linearly with N (Fig. 2 h). Besides the FBR, the total sound modulated light power increases as well (Fig. 2 i), however not linearly with N. We have simulated the iterative DOPC process (see Supplementary discussion) and the results are generally in good agreement with the experiments (Fig. 2 f–i). In addition, we also performed PSF measurements through 1.2 mm thick fixed rat brain tissue, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1.

Figure 2
(a) Lateral PSF measurement through 2 mm thick tissue phantoms (μs = 7.63 /mm, g factor = 0.9013) for iterations 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9.To normalize the peak intensity, the PSF data sets were multiplied by 6.5, 2, 1.5, and 1.5 for iteration ...

To demonstrate imaging of a complex fluorescent structure deep inside highly scattering media, we fabricated a c-shaped pattern consisting of fluorescent microspheres of 6 microns in diameter, completely embedded in the middle of a 4 mm thick tissue phantom (scattering coefficient: 7.63 /mm, g factor: 0.9013). In Fig. 3 a, a widefield microscopy image of the c-shaped fluorescence pattern is shown before it was embedded in the tissue phantom. Figure 3 b shows a widefield image taken through the tissue phantom. The shape information is completely lost due to the strong scattering. In Fig. 3 c, an image obtained with the first DOPC iteration is shown. The scanning step size was 6 microns and the raw data was re-sampled with linear interpolation. The structure can now be localized, but the shape of the object is not resolved. In Fig. 3 d, an image obtained after five DOPC iterations is shown. At this stage, the c-shape is already recognizable. After nine DOPC iterations the c-shaped structure is clearly resolved owing to the increased lateral resolution (Fig. 3 e). For comparison, we re-sampled the widefield image in Fig. 3 a to the same pixel size as in Fig. 3 c–e and convolved it with a Gaussian-shaped PSF (FWHM: 12 microns). The resulting image is shown in Fig. 3 f. An additional imaging experiment using sparsely distributed fluorescent beads is shown in Supplementary Fig. 2.

Figure 3
(a) Direct widefield image of the fluorescent structure without tissue phantoms.(b) Direct widefield image of the fluorescent structure surrounded by 2 mm thick tissue phantoms (μs = 7.63 /mm, g factor = 0.9013). (c) Image acquired with ...


In this study, we break the sound wave limited resolution barrier in the diffusive regime through iterative sound modulated DOPC. This technique improves the resolution in deep tissue fluorescence microscopy towards 10 microns while increasing the focus to background ratio by a factor of 5 at the same time. Better SLM performance such as lower pixel coupling and reduced phase jitter is expected to improve the current single iteration FBR by more than an order of magnitude, potentially yielding an exact N fold FBR gain through iterations. The increase in sound modulated power allowed us to shorten the acquisition time for the wavefront recording after the first couple of iterations. Moreover, this effect may enable us to focus light even deeper into tissue: by translating the sound focus in small steps between the iterations, the light focus can be gradually guided into deeper regions while maintaining a high sound modulated signal level.

In conclusion, our development is an important step towards practical deep-tissue fluorescence microscopy, providing sufficient resolution and contrast for many applications. Further improvement is expected with two photon fluorescence excitation, potentially leading to sub 10 micron spatial resolution and FBR > 200. We envision that our technique will find numerous applications in neuroscience, optogenetics, medical diagnostics, photodynamic therapy and other fields that require localized light radiation deep inside tissues.



Figure 1 e shows our experimental setup: two identical DOPC systems are used either to illuminate the sample with a phase conjugated beam or to record a wavefront emanating from the ultrasound focus within the sample. A Q-switched laser pumped Ti:sapphire oscillator, centered at 778 nm and with 20 ns pulse duration (Photonics Industries, NY), is split into two beams for the two DOPC systems. The two laser beams are used to illuminate the sample via DOPC1 and to serve as a reference beam to record a wavefront on DOPC2 or vice versa. In the beam path of DOPC2, the light is frequency shifted using an acousto-optical modulator such that a 10 Hz beating between the reference beam and the light emanating from the ultrasound guide star results when either DOPC system is used for wavefront recording. This beating is recorded by the camera of either DOPC system, allowing us to recover the wavefront using phase stepping interferometry. Since the laser has a finite coherence length (~1 cm), the path length has to be adjusted depending on which DOPC is used for wavefront recording to ensure proper interference. To this end, the optical path length for DOPC1 can be rapidly switched using beamsplitters and two fast mechanical shutters.

The sample is housed in a water chamber with three optical windows. Below the sample, an ultrasound transducer is mounted on a 3-axis motorized stage. Fluorescence emission is filtered by a bandpass filter and is imaged from the side of the sample chamber onto a camera. The camera is not used to record a spatially resolved widefield image but to measure the power of the fluorescence emission by summing all of its pixels. To form a fluorescence image, the ultrasound focus is raster scanned through the sample and at each position, iterative DOPC is applied. For each applied phase conjugation, the fluorescence emission is recorded with the camera. The timing and synchronization scheme was described in a previous publication18.

Author Contributions

The experiment was designed and implemented by M.C. Image data was acquired by M.C. and R.F. The fluorescence pattern was created by K.S. The scattering coefficient was measured by R.F. The numerical simulation was performed by K.S. All authors contributed to the data analysis and the preparation of the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information:

Supplementary information


We are grateful to Brenda Shields and Amy Hu for preparing the rat brain slices and Doug Murphy for lending us a filter set. We thank Mats Gustafsson for his insightful questions during the planning stage of this project. The research is supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.


  • Betzig E. et al. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313, 1642–1645 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Planchon T. A. et al. Rapid three-dimensional isotropic imaging of living cells using Bessel beam plane illumination. Nature Methods 8, 417–423 (2011). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wilt B. A. et al. Advances in Light Microscopy for Neuroscience. Annual Review of Neuroscience 32, 435–506 (2009). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ntziachristos V. Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology. Nature Methods 7, 603–614 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Tsien R. Y. The green fluorescent protein. Annual Review of Biochemistry 67, 509–544 (1998). [PubMed]
  • Denk W., Strickler J. H. & Webb W. W. 2-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248, 73–76 (1990). [PubMed]
  • Zipfel W. R., Williams R. M. & Webb W. W. Nonlinear magic: multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nature Biotechnology 21, 1368–1376 (2003). [PubMed]
  • Cella Zanacchi F. et al. Live-cell 3D super-resolution imaging in thick biological samples. Nature Methods 8, 1047–1049 (2011). [PubMed]
  • Wang L. V. Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography. Nature Photonics 3, 503–509 (2009). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Theer P. & Denk W. On the fundamental imaging-depth limit in two-photon microscopy. Journal of the Optical Society of America a-Optics Image Science and Vision 23, 3139–3149 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Tang J., Germain R. N. & Cui M. Superpenetration optical microscopy by iterative multiphoton adaptive compensation technique. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 8434–8439 (2012). [PubMed]
  • Supatto W., McMahon A., Fraser S. E. & Stathopoulos A. Quantitative imaging of collective cell migration during Drosophila gastrulation: multiphoton microscopy and computational analysis. Nature Protocols 4, 1397–1412 (2009). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Huisken J., Swoger J., Del Bene F., Wittbrodt J. & Stelzer E. H. K. Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy. Science 305, 1007–1009 (2004). [PubMed]
  • Lai P. X., Xu X., Liu H. L., Suzuki Y. & Wang L. H. V. Reflection-mode time-reversed ultrasonically encoded optical focusing into turbid media. Journal of Biomedical Optics 16 (2011). [PubMed]
  • Xu X., Liu H. & Wang L. V. Time-reversed ultrasonically encoded optical focusing into scattering media. Nature Photonics 5, 154–157 (2011). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zhang H. F., Maslov K., Stoica G. & Wang L. V. Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. Nature Biotechnology 24, 848–851 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Ntziachristos V., Ripoll J., Wang L. H. V. & Weissleder R. Looking and listening to light: the evolution of whole-body photonic imaging. Nature Biotechnology 23, 313–320 (2005). [PubMed]
  • Si K., Fiolka R. & Cui M. Fluorescence imaging beyond the ballistic regime by ultrasound-pulse-guided digital phase conjugation. Nature Photonics 6, 657–661 (2012). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wang Y. M., Judkewitz B., DiMarzio C. A. & Yang C. Deep-tissue focal fluorescence imaging with digitally time-reversed ultrasound-encoded light. Nature Communications 3, 928 (2012). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Katz O., Small E. & Silberberg Y. Looking around corners and through thin turbid layers in real time with scattered incoherent light. Nature Photonics 6, 549–553 (2012).
  • Hsieh C. L., Pu Y., Grange R., Laporte G. & Psaltis D. Imaging through turbid layers by scanning the phase conjugated second harmonic radiation from a nanoparticle. Optics Express 18, 20723–20731 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Ji N., Milkie D. E. & Betzig E. Adaptive optics via pupil segmentation for high-resolution imaging in biological tissues. Nature Methods 7, 141–147 (2009). [PubMed]
  • Kim M. et al. Maximal energy transport through disordered media with the implementation of transmission eigenchannels. Nature Photonics 6, 583–587 (2012).
  • Lerosey G., De Rosny J., Tourin A. & Fink M. Focusing beyond the diffraction limit with far-field time reversal. Science 315, 1120–1122 (2007). [PubMed]
  • Vellekoop I. M. & Mosk A. P. Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media. Optics Letters 32, 2309–2311 (2007). [PubMed]
  • Vellekoop I. M. & Mosk A. P. Universal optimal transmission of light through disordered materials. Physical Review Letters 101, 120601 (2008). [PubMed]
  • Popoff S., Lerosey G., Fink M., Boccara A. C. & Gigan S. Image transmission through an opaque material. Nature Communications 1, 81 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Cui M. & Yang C. Implementation of a digital optical phase conjugation system and its application to study the robustness of turbidity suppression by phase conjugation. Optics Express 18, 3444–3455 (2010). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Vellekoop I. M. Controlling the Propagation of Light in Disordered Scattering Media. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Twente (2008).

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group