Yeast cells must respond rapidly and effectively to alterations in the environment in order to survive stressful conditions. These processes require the involvement of signal transduction pathways such as TOR and
PKC1. The
PKC1 dependent CWIP is the first line of response to cell wall damage in the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae[
13,
14]. Transduction of the signal begins with the cell wall stress sensor proteins Wsc1p and Mid2p at the plasma membrane and proceeds through Rom2p and Rho1p to the
PKC1 CWIP that ends with activation of the MAP kinase, Slt2p [
13,
48] (Figure ). Downstream, the transcription factor Rlm1p activates nuclear genes involved in cell wall synthesis and remodeling to produce a cell wall stress response that increases the survival potential of the yeast cell [
9,
10]. We have shown in prior studies that the
PKC1 pathway is continuously activated in
myo1Δ strains [
4,
6]. This response is further characterized here in the
myo1Δ strains. In addition to the up regulation of the CWIP we found that TORC1 was down regulated to enhance cell survival and we provide evidence of cross-talk between the two signaling pathways.
Npr1p is a protein kinase that regulates the amino acid permease Gap1p to transport secondary nitrogen sources into the cell for the restoration of amino acid precursor levels and protein synthesis [
51,
64,
65]. When TORC1 is down regulated by nutrient starvation or rapamycin treatment, Npr1p becomes dephosphorylated by the protein phosphatase Sit4p, thereby activating its biochemical function [
50,
51,
53] Furthermore, inactivation of TORC1 results in downregulation of ribosome and protein synthesis [
59]. When we assayed the relative status of TORC1 activity in a
myo1Δ strain, we observed that Npr1p was maintained in the dephosphorylated state and demonstrated that the Npr1p phosphorylation state was directly dependent on TORC1 and Sit4p activities. Therefore, we established that the TORC1 complex is found in a predominantly inactive state in the
myo1Δ strain. The implications of such a metabolic state led us to believe that the survival of this strain is directly linked to this observation. However, the complete absence of Tor1p by genetic deletion (
tor1Δ) was detrimental for survival of the
myo1Δstrain, supporting that a precise level of TORC1 activity must be maintained for its survival. Furthermore, complete inhibition of TORC1 activity by rapamycin treatment of a
myo1Δtor1Δ strain was lethal for growth, further supporting the idea that minimal levels of TORC1 activity are essential. Conversely, the
tor1Δ single mutant was shown to acquire increased fitness, which was consistent with the proposed role of mTOR and TOR in regulating longevity and replicative life span extension respectively [
24-
27].
It was previously known that the TORC1 pathway plays a role in the response to cell wall stress by a negative regulation of the
PKC1 CWIP under nutrient rich conditions [
59] (Figure ). Under
myo1Δ conditions, we observed a clear inverse biochemical correlation between TORC1 and Pkc1p activities. This raised the question, is there a common upstream regulator of the two pathways? Our results are strongly suggestive that Wsc1p acts as a common upstream regulator of TORC1 and
PKC1 by exerting a positive role in the activation of the
PKC1 CWIP and a negative role in the down regulation of TORC1 by an unknown mechanism. We do not propose that TORC1 and Wsc1p interact directly. Most likely, the mechanism involves an undetermined protein interactor of Wsc1p (labeled “X” in Figure ). Recently, we have identified several novel Wsc1p interacting proteins (unpublished results) and suspect that some may function as a signaling intermediate between Wsc1p and TORC1. However, pending future studies, it is not known whether or not these Wsc1p interactors inhibit TORC1.
Our findings showed that
chs2Δ and
fks1Δ mutant strains strongly activated the
PKC1 CWIP yet maintained normal TORC1 activity levels. We are therefore confronted with variable signaling outputs exiting from the cell wall stress sensors. In particular, disruption of cell wall integrity by these mutants leads to activation of the
PKC1 CWIP; however, only the disruption of cytokinesis in a
myo1Δ strain leads to both activation of the
PKC1 CWIP and down regulation of TORC1 (Figure ). This finding is consistent with the transcriptional profiles we have determined previously, where
myo1Δ only regulated half of the CWIP fingerprint genes, while
fks1Δ and
chs2Δ profiles were more like other cell wall damage profiles [
4,
5]. This reinforces the idea that
myo1Δ activates a cell signaling program that is distinct from other cell wall mutants. We propose that in addition to its filament assembly function, the tail domain may serve as a scaffold (or guide) for the assembly of interacting protein complexes at the cytokinetic ring that are important for myosin function [
66]. Therefore, disruption of these putative protein assemblies by a genetic deletion of the
MYO1 gene may activate the cell wall stress sensors Wsc1p and Mid2p in a different manner than in the
chs2Δ and
fks1Δ mutants. The non-muscle myosin heavy chain (Myo1p) of budding yeast has been shown to have independent functions associated with the head and tail domains of the protein [
67]. The tail domain contains a Minimum Localization Domain (MLD) that is sufficient to target the myosin heavy chain to the bud neck independently of the actin-binding site that is encoded within the head domain [
68]. Therefore, despite the common activation of the
PKC1 CWIP among the
myo1Δ
, chs2Δ and
fks1Δ mutant strains, we hypothesize that the inhibition of TORC1 by Wsc1p is unique to the
myo1Δ mutant and may be triggered by the disruption of specific protein-protein interactions in the putative Myo1p scaffold at the cytokinetic ring.
The final question that arises from these results is, how does the
myo1Δ mutant rescue
tor2-21ts lethality? Strains that carry the temperature-sensitive gene of
TOR2 (
tor2ts) arrest growth at the restrictive temperature (37°C). This lethality is thought to be caused by the lack of TORC2 activity, decreased
RHO1 activation [
21], the lack of actin organization and cell lysis probably due to cell wall defects [
69]. The lethality has been shown to be rescued in several different ways. One way is by growth on nonfermentative carbon sources (i.e. raffinose) but not by nonfermentable carbon sources (i.e. glycerol or ethanol) [
69]. A second way in which
tor2ts lethality can be circumvented is by treatment with agents that cause cell integrity stress (i.e. 0.005% SDS) [
30]. A third way in which the
tor2ts lethality can be rescued is by the osmotic stabilizer, sorbitol, again suggesting that the cell wall is somehow compromised. Finally, there are several genes that have been shown to suppress the lethality of
tor2ts lethality. One example is yeast
PAS kinase overexpression (a gene involved in glucose partitioning in the cell) which is thought to suppress the
tor2ts lethality by
RHO1-dependent activation of
PKC1 and actin rearrangement, activation of
FKS1 and cell wall synthesis, or both [
69]. These observations have lead to the idea that cell growth and survival is a product of signals derived from cell integrity and nutrient availability [
69]. In this work we provide evidence for rescue of
tor2ts lethality by the deletion of the
MYO1 gene. We propose that
myo1Δ rescues the
tor2ts lethality by invoking both strategies described above, namely, by activating a starvation type response (TOR) and the cell wall integrity pathway (
PKC1 CWIP), most likely through the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. However, unlike the results of Cardon et al. [
69] where the essential Rho1p GEF was Rom2p, the roles of Rom1p and Rom2p appear to be redundant for the proposed
myo1Δ rescue mechanism (data not shown).