PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Environ Sci Technol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Oct 12, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3470465
NIHMSID: NIHMS278856
Investigation of human exposure to triclocarban after showering, and preliminary evaluation of its biological effects
Nils Helge Schebb, Bora Inceoglu, Ki Chang Ahn, Christophe Morisseau, Shirley Gee, and Bruce D. Hammock*
University of California, Davis, Department of Entomology and Cancer Center, One Shields Avenue, 95616 Davis, California, USA
*Corresponding author: Bruce D. Hammock Department of Entomology University of California at Davis One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 USA Tel: 530 752 7519 Fax: 530-751-1537 ; bdhammock/at/ucdavis.edu
The antibacterial soap additive triclocarban (TCC) is widely used in personal care products. TCC has a high environmental persistence. We developed and validated a sensitive online solid phase extraction-LC-MS/MS method to rapidly analyze TCC and its major metabolites in urine and other biological samples to assess human exposure. We measured human urine concentrations 0–72 h after showering with a commercial bar soap containing 0.6% TCC. The major route of renal elimination was excretion as N-glucuronides. The absorption was estimated at 0.6% of the 70±15 mg TCC in the soap used. The TCC N-glucuronide urine concentration varied widely among the subjects and continuous daily use of the soap led to steady state levels of excretion. In order to assess potential biological effects arising from this exposure we screened TCC for the inhibition of human enzymes in vitro. We demonstrate that TCC is a potent inhibitor of the enzyme soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH), whereas TCC′s major metabolites lack strong inhibitory activity. Topical administration of TCC at similar levels to rats in a preliminary in vivo study however failed to alter plasma biomarkers of sEH activity. Overall the analytical strategy described here revealed that use of TCC soap causes exposure levels that warrant further evaluation.
Keywords: Triclorcarban, metabolite, human exposure, online-solid phase extraction, soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibition, oxylipin metabolomics
Triclocarban (TCC, 3,4,4′-Trichlorocarbanilide) is widely used as an antibacterial agent in soaps1. Many of the antimicrobial bar soaps sold in the US contain up to 1.5% of TCC, amounting to a million pounds of this chemical used every year2, 3. Due to its environmental persistence and widespread use, TCC was found in surface water in concentrations up to μg/Llevels and recent studies show that TCC accumulates in snails and algae2, 4, 5. Moreover, the Targeted National Sewage Sludge Survey published in 2009 (US EPA) reports the detection of TCC in all 84 sewage samples analyzed. TCC was found at concentrations up to 0.44 g/kg, the highest levels of all synthetic compounds included in the study6. Based on the toxicological studies from the 1970s, the European Union regard the use of TCC in personal care products (PCP) as safe7. However, recent findings from our group indicate that TCC has significant biological effects on mammalian targets. At high concentrations, it might act as an endocrine disruptor by enhancing the action of testosterone and other steroids1, 8. Moreover, it was recently shown that oxidative metabolism of TCC may lead to reactive intermediates, which can covalently bind to proteins9. A high-throughput in vitro screening study also showed, that TCC inhibits potently the soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH)10. Its inhibitory potency is similar to many sEH inhibitors, which in vivo alter the biological regulation of inflammation, pain and blood pressure1113. Taken together, the high persistence of TCC in the environment, direct exposure by humans in PCP, and particularly the potent inhibition of sEH suggest that exposure to TCC could influence human health.
In order to assess this risk that TCC influences human health, human exposure levels have to be evaluated. Most human exposure studies on TCC were carried out in the 1970s using 14C labeled compound1418. Studies demonstrated that TCC is extensively metabolized in rodents, monkeys and humans15, 1923. Cytochrome P-450 monooxygenases are thought to be largely responsible for the extensive oxidative metabolism. The main phase I metabolites in all species are monohydroxylated-TCC derivatives, bearing a hydroxyl function in ortho position to the aniline group15, 1923. The sulfate conjugate of this 2′OH-TCC is the major metabolite found in human and monkey plasma though to a smaller extent 3′-OH-TCC has also been detected15, 20, 24. A method able to quantify TCC and all these metabolites is necessary to accurately assess human exposure to TCC. Recently, several sensitive LC electro-spray-ionization (ESI) MS methods were developed for the detection and quantification of TCC including, in some cases, the two byproducts of its synthesis, diclocarban (DCC, 4,4′-Dichlorocarbanilide) and 3′Cl-TCC. These methods were applied to environmental samples including water and sludge3, 2528. However, these methods did not include the quantification of major metabolites. Moreover, they are not designed to investigate biological samples. Online solid phase extraction (SPE) is a fast sample preparation approach for the analysis of biological samples which can be fully automated2932. This approach was successfully applied for the detection of TCC among other contaminants in breast milk33. This multianalyte method allows the detection of TCC only and not TCC metabolites and it employs a relatively long runtime of 24 minutes33.
Therefore in the present study, a fast online-solid phase extraction (SPE)-LC-ESI-MS/MS method specifically designed for the monitoring of TCC and its metabolites (2′OH-TCC, 3′OH-TCC and 2-SO3-O-TCC as well as its analogs DCC and 3′Cl-TCC) in plasma and urine was developed and validated. This method was utilized to investigate the urine concentration of TCC in human volunteers. Exposure to TCC was accomplished following showering with a commercial soap containing TCC. In order to extrapolate the potential of eliciting biological effects, we tested a comparable amount of TCC administered topically in a cream to rats and monitored biomarkers of sEH activity in vivo and evaluated the inhibitory potency of the metabolites in vitro.
Chemicals
3,4,4'-Trichlorocarbanilide (Triclorcarban, TCC) was purchased from Aldrich (St Louis, MO) and further purified (≥ 99.9%) by repeated re-crystallization. Beta-glucuronidase (GUS) from Helix pomatia Type I and Type II and GUS Type VA from E. coli were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). The internal standard I.S. (4-Chlorphenyl 13C6)-TCC (99% 13C) was obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc. (Andover, MA). All other chemicals were from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA) and were of the highest purityavailable. The chemical structures of the analytes are displayed in Fig S1.
Synthesis of standards
The TCC congeners, 4,4'-dichlorocarbanilide (DCC) and 3,3′,4,4'-tetrachlorocarbanilide (3′Cl-TCC), and TCC metabolites, 2′OH-TCC, 3′OH-TCC and 2′SO3O-TCC were synthesized using the appropriate isocyanate and amine as described previously8, 19, 34. The purity of the products was higher than 99% based on the peak areas following HPLC-UV-analysis at 270 nm.
Online-SPE-LC-MS/MS analysis of TCC and its analogs
Online SPE-LC analysis was performed in back-flush mode as described in the SI
Preparation of standard solutions and spiked samples
Analyte stock solutions (10 mM) were prepared in DMSO and stored at −20°C. A solution of I.S. was prepared in ACN/HAc 98/2 to a final concentration of 20 nM for 1:1 and 12.5 nM for 1:4 dilutions with the sample. For calibration, a multi standard solution (100 μM in ACN) was prepared from stock solution and sequentially diluted and mixed with I.S. solution 1:1 (v/v) yielding concentrations of 0.015–1500 nM of each analyte. For determination of recovery rates, spiked sample solutions were prepared by mixing 90 μL of pooled blank human urine and pooled blank rat plasma with 10 μl of 1000 nM, 300 nM and 100 nM of I.S. free standard solutions, respectively. Each spiked solution was prepared in triplicate and was treated like other samples.
Human exposure to TCC following showering with a TCC containing soap
TCC exposure was investigated in a group of six healthy volunteers (Information about the subjects is provided in the SI). This study was reviewed and approved by the UC Davis IRB committee and informed consent forms were obtained from the subjects prior to the study. The volunteers were questioned about their use of TCC containing products, and instructed not to use them during the sampling period. Directly before the exposure a urine sample was collected from the volunteers (t=0 h). The volunteers were then asked to take a shower with commercial 0.6% TCC containing soap (Dial Gold soap, Dial/Henkel, St. Louis, MO) obtained locally. The individuals took a shower, rubbing soap throughout the whole body except for head and genitals. In order to minimize inter-individual differences in shower procedures, the individuals let the foam stand for 15 min prior to wash off. Aliquots from each urination over a time span of 24–48 hours, and a single sample after 72 h were collected and stored at −20°C until analysis. To normalize the urine samples by renal fluid excretion rate, the creatinine concentrations of all urine samples were determined by a standard photometric method using 2,4,6-trinitrophenol35.
Sample preparation
For analyses, 50–100 μL aliquots of samples were mixed with I.S. solution 1/1 (v/v), vortexed and centrifuged at 16,000 × g at 4°C for 5 min. The supernatant was directly injected into the online-SPE-LC-ESI-MS/MS system.
Acid TCC conjugate hydrolysis was carried out as described by Scharpf et al. with minor modifications14. Hydrochloric acid (100 μL) was added to 500 μL of urine to a final acid concentration of 1 M in a 3 mL glass vial with a screw cap. The mixtures were vortexed and heated for 20 min to 100 °C, cooled down on ice and neutralized with 90 μL of 6 M aqueous NaOH. An aliquot of the resulting solution was subsequently mixed with I.S. solution 1:4 (v/v) and analyzed in the same way as the other samples. For enzymatic hydrolysis, the samples were mixed (9:1, sample:enzyme) with GUS form E. coli type VA (10,000 units/mL in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer) and incubated overnight at 37°C. The optimization of the conjugate hydrolysis is described in the SI.
Topical administration of TCC to rats
Four male rats (Charles River Inc. Boston, MA) with a body weight of 485±20 g were used. This study was approved by the institutional UC Davis Animal Care and Use Committee. Animals were housed in UC Davis facilities with access to food and water ad libitum,. In order to generate a human equivalent exposure to TCC in rats we formulated TCC in a cream. The cream was prepared by dissolving TCC in PEG400 and mixing this 1:9 (v:v) with commercially available VaniCream® as described to give a final TCC concentration of 1% (v:wt)13. This amount is similar to the concentrations found in commercially available soaps. Before the administration of TCC, a blood sample (500 μL) was taken from the tail vein of each animal 2 hours after treatment with TCC free VaniCream. These baseline samples from the first week served as controls. One week following the baseline sampling Vanicream formulated with TCC (a volume of 75 μL cream corresponding to a topical dose of 1.5 mg/kg bodyweight) was applied and blood (500 μL) was sampled 2 hours following topical administration. In the following week Vanicream formulated with TCC (a volume of 200 μL cream corresponding to a topical dose of 4 mg/kg) was again administered and blood was sampled 2 hours following administration. The cream was administered to one hind paw of the rat and gently rubbed for 1 min. until the cream disappeared into the paw. The rats were monitored by the investigator between application and sample collection and they did not lick the paw.Thus the possibility of oral absorption can be excluded.
Plasma was separated from heparinized blood samples and was stored at −70°C until analysis. To monitor TCC, 20 μL and for its metabolites 18 μl of plasma were used. For the quantitative analysis of oxylipins 200 μL of plasma were analyzed by LCMS/MS, as described by Yang et al. with modifications36 (see SI). Additionally single urine sample from the animals receiving the highest dose were collected 2–8 h after treatment and analysed for the presence of TCC-N-glucuronides.
In vitro measurement of sEH inhibition by TCC and its metabolites
The potency of TCC and its metabolites was determined for the recombinant human and rat sEH enyzmes. Baculovirus expressed, purified enzymes were used in all assays37. The inhibitory potencies were measured using two independent activity assays, one based on the generation of a fluorescent product38 and the other based on the hydrolysis of a putative endogenous substrate: 14,15-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (14,15-EET) using LC-MS detection of the resulting diol as described39.
In vitro screening for inhibition of human enzymes
The effects of TCC and its metabolites on the activity of human esterases, microsomal amidase, Cytochrome P-450 monooxyganases, glutathione-S-tranferases and mitochondrial epoxide hydrolase were investigated in a standard battery of in vitro assays described in the SI.
Data analysis
All results are reported as mean of three determinations. For rat plasma the variation is reported as standard error (SE). Oxylipin data were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Dunnett's 2-sided t-test for between group comparisons.
Development of an automated analytical method for TCC exposure assessment
In order to rapidly analyze TCC and its metabolites in urine and plasma samples, an online SPE-LC-ESI-MS/MS method allowing the direct injection of these crude biological samples (a detailed description is given in SI) was developed and optimized. The method allows baseline separation, selective analysis and quantification of TCC, its metabolites and two analogs in less than 7 minutes including the online SPE step. The limit of detection (LOD, S/N = 3) for TCC and most of the analytes was 0.15 nM (50 pg/mL) equivalent to 6 fmol on the column (Table 1). The method provided a broad linear range of detection, over 3 orders of magnitude (r2≥0.99, Table 1). Using plasma and urine samples spiked with 10, 30 and 100 nM of the analytes, we observed a near perfect accuracy for all compounds, with a mean recovery rate of 104 ± 8% for both urine and plasma (table S2). In addition to the high accuracy, the method precision was also excellent with an inter sample variation of less than 5% and an intra sample variation of less than 10% for all analytes (table S2). Thus, the direct injection of crude samples after addition of I.S. and centrifugation in the fully automated ultra-fast online-SPE-LC-MS/MS did not compromise the analytical performance and is ideally suited for the exposure measurement of TCC.
Table 1
Table 1
Performance of the new online solid phase extraction-LC-MS/MS method. The observed retention times, the dynamic range of for each analyte and the limit of detection (LOD) are presented.
Investigation of human exposure to TCC following showering with a TCC containing soap
The findings from Hiles and Birch indicate that the renal excretion is suitable for the investigation of human exposure to TCC15. Therefore we chose urine analysis for this study. The dry weight of the soap bars were determined before and after shower by six human volunteers (A–F). The mean soap consumption was 11.7±2.6 g (70±15 mg TCC) corresponding to an average a maximal topical dose of 1 mg/Kg bodyweight (40 mg/m2 body surface area). This soap consumption is consistent with earlier findings from Howes and Black, who reported a soap consumption of 13.75 ± 4.40 g per use16. Subjects B through F did not use other TCC containing PCPs prior to or after the exposure. Subject A however declared using 0.6% TCC containing soap on a daily basis. This subject was instructed to abstainfrom using TCC containing soap for 3 weeks after the experiment to monitor the decline in TCC levels and obtain a baseline urine sample. This subject then restarted regular use and provided further urine samples.
Direct urine analysis
In all samples analyzed TCC was barely detectable and only a few samples exceeded the LOQ (0.3 nM in urine).. The TCC concentration reached an apex between 10–18 h after exposure with a maximum concentration of 0.75 nM (Fig. 1). The main oxidative metabolite, 2′OH-TCC, displayed a similar profile to TCC and only a few samples exceeded the LOQ (Fig. 1). Neither 3′OH-TCC nor the conjugate 2′SO3-O-TCC was detectable in any of the urine samples in quantifiable amounts. Thus urine concentration of TCC including its oxidative metabolites is negligible since less than 1 ng/mL is excreted in urine. However, TCC is excreted in urine in humans and monkey after direct glucuronidation14, 15, 20, 22. Therefore, the urine samples were screened for the resulting TCC-N-glucuronides (TCC-N-G) by LC-MS/MS. Large peaks of these metabolites were detected in the urine of all the exposed subjects (see, SI).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Levels of TCC and its metabolite 2′OH-TCC in the urine of volunteer B following exposure following showering. The results of direct urine analysis without conjugate cleavage are shown as mean values and standard deviation of three direct injections. (more ...)
Urine analysis after hydrolysis
Reference compounds or synthetic methods for the TCC-N-Gs are not available. Thus, to quantify the total amount of TCC excreted, the conjugates were hydrolyzed prior to analysis. The measured concentration of 2′-OH-TCC and 3′OH-TCC did not increase after the hydrolysis. Therefore, oxidative TCC metabolites are not excreted in relevant amounts via a renal route as conjugates nor as aglycons (see above). In contrast, the measured quantity of TCC in urine increases dramatically after acid hydrolysis (Fig. 12). The excretion profile of the liberated TCC over the post exposure time period is perfectly consistent with the semi-quantitative profile of the peak areas for the TCC-N-Gs in all volunteers. (Fig. 2 and Fig. S11). These findings strongly support earlier reports that renal excretion of TCC is almost exclusively through N-glucuronidated metabolites14, 15, 20, 22.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
TCC concentration in the urine after conjugate hydrolysis. A. Line graph of TCC levels in the urine of six healthy volunteers. B. Volunteer A, a regular TCC-soap user re-started his/her normal use of soap containing 0.6% TCC after 18 days of abstinence. (more ...)
The highest concentrations of TCC-N-Gs measured as liberated TCC occurred 10–24 hours after exposure (Fig. 2). Despite using the same showering procedure and comparable soap consumption a massive inter-individual variation in the maximal TCC concentration was determined (119 to 1013 nM, table S4). Moreover the urinary excretion of TCC-N-G profiles normalized by creatinine content also varied significantly (Fig. 2). Volunteers A, B and D displayed a steep increase in the TCC excretion 0–12 h after exposure, which decreased in a biphasic manner. The renal excretion of volunteers C, D and E increased more slowly and the urinary concentration remained almost constant over a period of 12–36 h after exposure. Overall, the data suggest that complete clearance required more than 72 h (Fig. 2). During repeated daily showering with TCC containing soap, the excretion of TCC-N-Gs reached a steady level over time, as demonstrated for volunteer A with a TCC g−1 creatinine level of 79±20 μg or 420±242 nM TCC-N-Gs (Fig. 2).
Two independent 14C exposure studies in humans reported that approximately 25% of the TCC absorbed was excreted in the urine14, 15. Thus the total absorbed amount of TCC from the single shower can be calculated based on the total urine excretion. However, since only aliquots of each urination over the excretion period were collected the volume of the urine samples and thus the total excreted amount is unknown. The approximate extent of urinary TCC-N-G excretion can be estimated despite the lack of total volume of urination over the excretion period. The daily urinary creatinine excretion is in most individuals relatively constant, with an estimated mean of 1.5 g/24 h40 and the volume of each urination is between 0.2–0.7 L (limited by bladder size). With these assumptions a volume was assigned to each urine sample, for the highest and the lowest possible total TCC-N-Gs excretion (see details and formula in the SI). A wide but defined range for each subject, ranging from 95–290 μg TCC for volunteer A to 14–42 μg TCC for volunteer F was found (table S4, mean of all subjects, 110±30 μg TCC).. Taking into account that 25% of TCC is excreted in the urine14, 15, it can be roughly estimated that on average 0.5±0.1 mg per shower per person was absorbed.. This corresponds to an absorbed portion of 0.6±0.2% of the TCC amount applied with the soap, consistent with the findings of Scharpf et al., who report 0.39% after a similar whole body shower experiment14.
Bioactivity of TCC
In order to investigate if TCC exposure following showering can alter the activity of sEH, we administered a comparable topical dose of 1.5 mg/kg BW and a higher dose of 4 mg/kg BW topically to rats. In contrast to the human study, in which TCC was washed off after 15 min, in the rat study TCC was administered in a cream. Thus we anticipated that this route of administration led to a higher or at least similar absorption to human exposure.The plasma levels of TCC reached a mean of 16 nM for the low dose and 94 nM for the high dose animal group (Fig. S12). Notably glucuronide hydrolysis of plasma samples with GUS isozymes did not change the TCC concentration. In urine samples collected from rats no TCC-N-Gs were detected. This finding supports the earlier observations that in the rat TCC is not metabolized by N-glucuronidation1921. No free 2′OH-TCC and 3′OH-TCC was detected in rat plasma. Following GUS treatment low amounts of 9 nM of 2′OH-TCC and approximately 1 nM of 3′OH-TCC were detected in the high dose group. In both high and low dose groups substantial concentrations of 2′SO3-O-TCC (>1600 nM), the main known TCC metabolite in rat and human plasma was found (Fig. S12)20. These plasma levels indicate that a significant portion of the topically administered TCC was absorbed through the paw skin in both groups.
Next, we investigated if these plasma levels corresponded to changes in the biomarkers of sEH activity in the plasma. Plasma levels of epoxy-fatty-acids and their corresponding sEH generated degradation products, the dihydroxy-fatty-acids, from arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid were quantified following topical administration of TCC. The ratio of epoxy to dihydroxy fatty acids is a reliable measure of in vivo sEH activity11, 41. Significant changes in the ratio of epoxy to dihydroxy fatty acids were not observed in either the low dose or the high dose groups (Fig. S13). Since the ratio of epoxy to dihydroxy fatty acids reflects systemic inhibition of sEH11, we conclude that topical TCC doses did not significantly alter systemic sEH activity.
In order to evaluate the in vitro potency of TCC and its metabolites as inhibitors of human and rat sEH, the IC50 values were determined utilizing two independent methods, one employing a fluorescent substrate andthe other employing an endogenous substrate of sEH 14(15)EpETrE38, 39. The potency determined for TCC inhibitor with the fluorescence assay are well in line with the natural substrate (Table 2) and previously reported values10. The human and the rat sEH are inhibited to a similar degree by TCC regardless of the method used. All TCC metabolites show lower inhibition potency than the parent compound (Table 2). In particular the main plasma metabolite 2′SO3O-TCC bearing a bulky sulphate group ortho to the urea moiety, reduces the inhibitory activity towards sEH about 100 fold. Thus, the metabolism of TCC to these metabolites leads to a biological deactivation of TCC with respect to sEH inhibition.
Table 2
Table 2
Inhibitory potency of TCC on sEH. Potency (IC50 values) for TCC and its metabolites were determined using the recombinant human and rat sEH with the fluorescence assay (substrate: cyano(6-methoxy-naphthalen-2-yl)methyl trans-[{3-phenyloxiran-2-yl)methyl] (more ...)
In the in vitro screening for other inhibitory potencies , no effect of TCC and its metabolites was detected on the activity of human carboxylesterases, fatty acid amidase, microsomal epoxide hydrolase, cytochrome P450 activity and glutathione S-transferases.
An analytical method suited for biological samples is indispensable for the determination of human exposure to TCC. The first aim of our study was to develop a rapid, accurate and robust analytical approach for the parallel quantification of TCC, its analogs and metabolites in biological fluids. Through the application of online-SPE sample preparation prior to LC-MS/MS analysis, sample preparation was minimized. Overall, only four steps required manual labour, (i) sample collection (ii) mixing with I.S. solution (iii) centrifugation and (iv) transferring the supernatant to the vial. Considering that 30 samples are centrifuged at the same time, cumulative hands on preparation time required per sample is less than 1 min per sample. The online SPE-LC-ESI-MS/MS approach developed herein is not only rapid (7 min/sample), but has excellent accuracy and precision for urine and plasma samples. Due to its sensitivity, it is possible to accurately monitor TCC and concurrently its major oxidative metabolites in these biological samples without the need to expose human subjects to radioactivity as described earlier14, 15.
Following showering with a soap containing 0.6% TCC, the renal excretion profile obtained, including the presence of TCC-N-Gs as major metabolites and the lack of oxidative metabolites, is consistent with all previous studies on the human metabolism of TCC15, 20, 42. . The levels of TCC-N-G (Fig. 2) are consistently higher than those reported from previous showering or bathing studies with TCC containing soaps. Specifically, Gruenke et al. reported 30 ng/mL TCC-N-Gs (60 nM) in the urine of users of TCC containing bar soaps, though the TCC content of these soaps and bathing procedures were not reported42. Interestingly, Howes and Black did not find TCC (<25 ng/mL) in the urine of human subjects after intensive 28-day bathing with 2% TCC containing soap16. However, this is most likely due to a lack of appropriate conjugate hydrolysis.
In contrast to earlier human exposure studies, here the amounts of excreted TCC in urine were quantified in each urination following exposure. Therefore we demonstrated for the first time that renal excretion of TCC varies widely among individual subjects (Fig. 2). The maximal TCC-N-Gs concentrations in the urine were detected 12–24h after exposure with up to a 10-fold variation among individuals (table S4). These differences did not correlate with age, height or weight BMI and body surface area of the volunteers (Table S3) and are most likely due to individual differences in absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. The total clearance of TCC in urine following a single exposure required approximately 72 hr. In order to investigate if TCC accumulated due to its slow excretion, we quantified the urine concentrations of TCC and its metabolites over a time period of two weeks of daily showering with TCC in a single individual. No accumulation of TCC or its metabolites was detected (Fig. 2), but urinary excretion reached a constant level of 79±20 μg TCC-N-Gs g−1 creatinine indicating a steady state of TCC body burden.
The large amount of TCC extracted as TCC-N-Gs via the urine in the subjects demonstrates that a relevant portion of TCC (70±15 mg, equivalent to a topical dose 1 mg/kg BW) was absorbed after showering. Considering a renal excretion rate of 25%14, 15 and a constant creatinine excretion rate of 1.5 g/24 h, we estimated that the mean absorption of TCC was 0.5±0.1 mg corresponding to 0.6±0.2% of the dose applied (a detailed description of the model used is given in SI). This result is consistent with previous findings of 0.4% absorption of the TCC applied in a similar showering study using 14C labelled TCC14. This good correlation argues that the TCC-N-Gs levels in urine are highly predictive of the human TCC exposure and TCC-N-Gs levels are ideally suited for monitoring TCC exposure.
Our in vitro screening results indicate that TCC does not affect the activity of human carboxylesterases, fatty acid amidase, microsomal epoxide hydrolases, cytochrome P450 and glutathione S-transferases. However we could show with two independent methods that TCC is a nanomolar inhibitor of sEH. TCC exhibits a similar inhibitory potency (IC50) when recombinant human and rat enzymes are compared (Table 2). Thus, the rat may be a suitable model for humans when investigating the biological effects of TCC mediated by sEH inhibition. Since the preliminary rat exposure study described here did not lead to systemic inhibition of sEH as measured by oxylipin profiles (Fig. S13), it seems possible that the systemic concentrations of free TCC (non-conjugated) found in humans through showering may not be sufficient to cause effects through sEH inhibition. However at the site of topical application, the TCC concentration might reach levels which lead to local effects via sEH inhibition. Possible reasons for the lack of systemic effects of TCC could be non-covalent protein binding, causing a low uptake into the cells. A key finding of this study is the deactivation of the inhibitory potency of TCC on sEH by its metabolism. As demonstrated in this study all investigated TCC metabolites show a lower potency than the parent compound (Table 2). The in vitro potency of TCC-N-Gs was not determined since reference compounds were not available. However, based on the extensive SAR of sEH inhibitors it is highly unlikely that these major urinary metabolites would inhibit sEH4345. We predict that the glucuronic acid group would prevent hydrogen binding of the urea moiety in the active site of the enzyme, and based on our crystal structure data TCC-N-G′s are too large to fit in the catalytic pocket.
Overall our human exposure study in a small group of subjectsshowed that a portion of the TCC present in bar soaps is absorbed through the skin and is excreted in urine as N-glucuronides. These urinary glucuronides appear to be valuable biomarkers of TCC exposure.. TCC is a nanomolar inhibitor of sEH, and inhibition of this enzyme has been shown to have profound though largely beneficial effects on mammalian physiology. Our studies of TCC exposure in human volunteers using a commercial soap when compared to preliminary exposure and efficacy data in the rat suggest that such TCC exposures are unlikely to elicit systemic changes based on sEH inhibition. However, local dermal effects cannot be ruled out. The TCC exposures found following showering also indicate that a careful risk benefit analysis of TCC in personal care products should be undertaken. In particular, long term exposure studies in humans that include bio-monitoring of TCC in blood should be carried out to evaluate if exposure after using PCPs containing up to 1.5% TCC provide a sufficient margin of safety. With the online-SPE-LC-MS/MS method described herein, we provide an excellent analytical tool to answer these questions.
Supplementary Material
1_si_001
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by NIEHS (R01 ES002710, P42 ES004699), NIOSH (PHS OH07550) and the German Academic Exchange Service. B.D.H is a senior fellow of the American Asthma Society. The help of Andrew Port and Moritz Reintjes for their work on the modelling of total TCC excretion is gratefully acknowledged. Marion Huby, Huazhang Huang and Aman Samra are thanked for her work on the enzyme inhibition assays.
List of abbreviations
14(15)-EpETrE14,15-Epoxyeicosa-5(Z)-enoic Acid
BWbody weight
DCCdiclocarban
EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency
ESIelectro-spray ionization
GUSglucuronidase
I.S.Internal Standard
LCliquid chromatography
MSmass spectrometry
PCPpersonal care product
SARstructure-activity relationship
sEHsoluble epoxide hydrolase
SISupporting Information
SPEsolid phase extraction
SRMselected reaction monitoring
TCCtriclocarban
TCC-N-Gtriclocarban-N-glucuronide

Footnotes
Competing financial interest declaration The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supporting Information (SI): Details of methods and results pertaining to the LC-MS analyses of TCC its metabolites, oxylipins and the enzyme inhibition assays are provided in the SI. Moreover detailed results are presented in six tables and 13 Figures. This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
1. Chen J, Ahn KC, Gee NA, Ahmed MI, Duleba AJ, Zhao L, Gee SJ, Hammock BD, Lasley BL. Triclocarban enhances testosterone action: a new type of endocrine disruptor? Endocrinology. 2008;149(3):1173–9. [PubMed]
2. Halden RU, Paull DH. Co-occurrence of triclocarban and triclosan in U.S. water resources. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(6):1420–6. [PubMed]
3. Halden RU, Paull DH. Analysis of triclocarban in aquatic samples by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38(18):4849–55. [PubMed]
4. Coogan MA, Edziyie RE, La Point TW, Venables BJ. Algal bioaccumulation of triclocarban, triclosan, and methyl-triclosan in a North Texas wastewater treatment plant receiving stream. Chemosphere. 2007;67(10):1911–8. [PubMed]
5. Coogan MA, La Point TW. Snail bioaccumulation of triclocarban, triclosan, and methyltriclosan in a North Texas, USA, stream affected by wastewater treatment plant runoff. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008;27(8):1788–93. [PubMed]
6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Targeted National Sewage Sludge Survey: overview report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, DC: 2009. EPA-822-R-08-014.
7. European Commission Scientific Committee on Consumer Products, Opinion on triclocarban for other uses than as a preservative. European Commission; Brussels, Belgium: EU 2005, SCCP/0851/04, (Colipa n 29)
8. Ahn KC, Zhao B, Chen J, Cheredenichenko G, Sanmarti E, Denision MS, Lasley BL, Pessah IN, Kültz D, Chan DPY, Gee SJ, Hammock BD. In Vitro Biological Activities of the Antimicrobials Triclocarban, its Analogues, and Triclosan in Bioassay Screens. Receptor-Based Bioassay Screens. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:1203–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Baumann A, Lohmann W, Rose T, Ahn KC, Hammock BD, Karst U, Schebb NH. Electrochemistry-mass spectrometry unveils the formation of reactive triclocarban (TCC) metabolites. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010 DOI: 10.1021/jm100691c. [PubMed]
10. Morisseau C, Merzlikin O, Lin A, He G, Feng W, Padilla I, Denison MS, Pessah IN, Hammock BD. Toxicology in the fast lane: application of high-throughput bioassays to detect modulation of key enzymes and receptors. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(12):1867–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Imig JD, Hammock BD. Soluble epoxide hydrolase as a therapeutic target for cardiovascular diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8(10):794–805. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Inceoglu B, Jinks SL, Ulu A, Hegedus CM, Georgi K, Schmelzer KR, Wagner K, Jones PD, Morisseau C, Hammock BD. Soluble epoxide hydrolase and epoxyeicosatrienoic acids modulate two distinct analgesic pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(48):18901–6. [PubMed]
13. Inceoglu B, Jinks SL, Schmelzer KR, Waite T, Kim IH, Hammock BD. Inhibition of soluble epoxide hydrolase reduces LPS-induced thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia in a rat model of inflammatory pain. Life Sci. 2006;79(24):2311–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Scharpf LG, Jr., Hill ID, Maibach HI. Percutaneous penetration and disposition of triclocarban in man: body showering. Arch Environ Health. 1975;30(1):7–14. [PubMed]
15. Hiles RA, Birch CG. The absorption, excretion, and biotransformation of 3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide in humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 1978;6(2):177–83. [PubMed]
16. Howes D, Black JG. Percutaneous absorption of triclocarban in rat and man. Toxicology. 1976;6(1):67–76. [PubMed]
17. Black JG, Howes D, Rutherford T. Skin deposition and penetration of trichlorocarbanilide. Toxicology. 1975;3(2):253–64. [PubMed]
18. Wester RC, Maibach HI, Surinchak J, Bucks DAW. Predictability of in vitro diffusion systems. Effect of skin types and ages on percutaneous absorption of triclocarban. Dermatology. 1985;6(Percutaneous Absorpt.):223–6.
19. Warren JT, Allen R, Carter DE. Identification of the metabolites of trichlorocarbanilide in the rat. Drug Metab Dispos. 1978;6(1):38–44. [PubMed]
20. Birch CG, Hiles RA, Eichhold TH, Jeffcoat AR, Handy RW, Hill JM, Willis SL, Hess TR, Wall ME. Biotransformation products of 3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide in rat, monkey, and man. Drug Metab Dispos. 1978;6(2):169–76. [PubMed]
21. Jeffcoat AR, Handy RW, Francis MT, Willis S, Wall ME, Birch CG, Hiles RA. The metabolism and toxicity of halogenated carbanilides. Biliary metabolites of 3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide and 3-trifluoromethyl-4,4'-dichlorocarbanilide in the rat. Drug Metab Dispos. 1977;5(2):157–66. [PubMed]
22. Hiles RA, Caudill D, Birch CG, Eichhold T. The metabolism and disposition of 3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide in the intact and bile duct-cannulated adult and in the newborn rhesus monkey (M. mulatta) Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1978;46(3):593–608. [PubMed]
23. Hiles RA, Birch CG. Nonlinear metabolism and disposition of 3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1978;46(2):323–37. [PubMed]
24. Hernando MD, Ferrer C, Ulaszewska M, Garcia-Reyes JF, Molina-Diaz A, Fernandez-Alba AR. Application of high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with a quadrupole/linear ion trap instrument for the analysis of pesticide residues in olive oil. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007;389(6):1815–31. [PubMed]
25. Sapkota A, Heidler J, Halden RU. Detection of triclocarban and two co-contaminating chlorocarbanilides in US aquatic environments using isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Environ Res. 2007;103(1):21–9. [PubMed]
26. Cha J, Cupples AM. Detection of the antimicrobials triclocarban and triclosan in agricultural soils following land application of municipal biosolids. Water Res. 2009;43(9):2522–30. [PubMed]
27. Gonzalez-Marino I, Quintana JB, Rodriguez I, Cela R. Simultaneous determination of parabens, triclosan and triclocarban in water by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009;23(12):1756–66. [PubMed]
28. Garcia-Ac A, Segura PA, Viglino L, Furtos A, Gagnon C, Prevost M, Sauve S. On-line solid-phase extraction of large-volume injections coupled to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the quantitation and confirmation of 14 selected trace organic contaminants in drinking and surface water. J Chromatogr A. 2009;1216(48):8518–27. [PubMed]
29. Mullett WM. Determination of drugs in biological fluids by direct injection of samples for liquid-chromatographic analysis. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2007;70(2):263–73. [PubMed]
30. Novakova L, Vlckova H. A review of current trends and advances in modern bio-analytical methods: chromatography and sample preparation. Anal Chim Acta. 2009;656(1–2):8–35. [PubMed]
31. Xu RN, Fan L, Rieser MJ, El-Shourbagy TA. Recent advances in high-throughput quantitative bioanalysis by LC-MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007;44(2):342–55. [PubMed]
32. Schebb NH, Inceoglu B, Rose T, Wagner K, Hammock BD. Development of an ultra fast online-solid phase extraction (SPE) liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) based approach for the determination of drugs in pharmacokinetic studies. Anal Methods. 2010 DOI: 10.1039/c0ay00714e. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Ye X, Kuklenyik Z, Needham LL, Calafat AM. Measuring environmental phenols and chlorinated organic chemicals in breast milk using automated on-line column-switching-high performance liquid chromatography-isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B. 2006;831(1–2):110–5. [PubMed]
34. Craig JC, Gruenke LD, North-Root H, Corbin NC. Synthesis and hydrolytic behavior of the sulfate conjugate of 2'-hydroxy-3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide. Drug Metab Dispos. 1989;17(3):345–7. [PubMed]
35. Husdan H, Rapoport A. Estimation of creatinine by the Jaffe reaction. A comparison of three methods. Clin Chem. 1968;14(3):222–38. [PubMed]
36. Yang J, Schmelzer K, Georgi K, Hammock BD. Quantitative profiling method for oxylipin metabolome by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2009;81(19):8085–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Beetham JK, Tian T, Hammock BD. cDNA cloning and expression of a soluble epoxide hydrolase from human liver. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993;305(1):197–201. [PubMed]
38. Jones PD, Wolf NM, Morisseau C, Whetstone P, Hock B, Hammock BD. Fluorescent substrates for soluble epoxide hydrolase and application to inhibition studies. Anal Biochem. 2005;343(1):66–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Morisseau C, Hammock BD. Measurment of Soluble Epoxid Hydrolase (sEH) activity. Curr. Protoc. Toxicol. 2007;33:4.23.1–4.23.18.
40. Scott PJ, Hurley PJ. Demonstration of individual variation in constancy of 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion. Clin Chim Acta. 1968;21(3):411–4. [PubMed]
41. Spector AA, Fang X, Snyder GD, Weintraub NL. Epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs): metabolism and biochemical function. Prog Lipid Res. 2004;43(1):55–90. [PubMed]
42. Gruenke LD, Craig JC, Wester RC, Maibach HI, North-Root H, Corbin NC. A selected ion monitoring GC/MS assay for 3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide and its metabolites in biological fluids. J Anal Toxicol. 1987;11(2):75–80. [PubMed]
43. Morisseau C, Du G, Newman JW, Hammock BD. Mechanism of mammalian soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibition by chalcone oxide derivatives. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998;356(2):214–28. [PubMed]
44. Morisseau C, Goodrow MH, Dowdy D, Zheng J, Greene JF, Sanborn JR, Hammock BD. Potent urea and carbamate inhibitors of soluble epoxide hydrolases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(16):8849–54. [PubMed]
45. Rose TE, Morisseau C, Liu JY, Inceoglu B, Jones PD, Sanborn JR, Hammock BD. 1-Aryl-3-(1-acylpiperidin-4-yl)urea Inhibitors of Human and Murine Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase: Structure-Activity Relationships, Pharmacokinetics, and Reduction of Inflammatory Pain. J Med Chem. 2010 DOI: 10.1021/jm100691c. [PMC free article] [PubMed]