Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
J Biol Chem. 2012 October 5; 287(41): 34372–34385.
Published online 2012 August 15. doi:  10.1074/jbc.M111.325332
PMCID: PMC3464543

Polycomb Antagonizes p300/CREB-binding Protein-associated Factor to Silence FOXP3 in a Kruppel-like Factor-dependent Manner*An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpg


Inducible gene expression underlies the epigenetically inherited differentiation program of most immune cells. We report that the promoter of the FOXP3 gene possesses two distinct functional states: an “off state” mediated by the polycomb histone methyltransferase complex and a histone acetyltransferase-dependent “on state.” Regulating these states is the presence of a Kruppel-like factor (KLF)-containing Polycomb response element. In the KLF10−/− mouse, the FOXP3 promoter is epigenetically silenced by EZH2 (Enhancer of Zeste 2)-mediated trimethylation of Histone 3 K27; thus, impaired FOXP3 induction and inappropriate adaptive T regulatory cell differentiation results in vitro and in vivo. The epigenetic transmittance of adaptive T regulatory cell deficiency is demonstrated throughout more than 40 generations of mice. These results provide insight into chromatin remodeling events key to phenotypic features of distinct T cell populations.

Keywords: Epigenetics, Histone Modification, Kruppel-like Factor (KLF), Polycomb, T Cell Biology, FOXP3, T Regulatory Cell


FOXP3+ T regulatory (Treg)3 cells may develop outside the thymus, generally in response to TGFβ and antigen where they are critically important in intestinal immunologic homeostasis (so-called adaptive or induced Treg cells) (16). Dysregulation of the transcription factor FOXP3, a key driver of the T cell regulatory program leads to intestinal inflammation in both mice (scurfy mouse) and humans (immune polyendocrinopathy enteritis and X-linked syndrome, or IPEX) (7). Although recent advances in lamina propria T lymphocyte biology indicate the importance of TGFβ-induced activated T cells in both the induction (Th17 cells) and regulation (FOXP3+ Treg cells) of intestinal inflammation (8, 9), the precise mechanistic events directing the TGFβ signal to inducers or regulators of inflammation are currently obscure.

Kruppel-like factors (KLFs) constitute a family of diverse transcription regulatory proteins that regulate the expression of a large number of genes with established relevance to epithelial cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and transformation (10, 11). KLF family members have only recently emerged as important transcriptional modifiers of T lymphocyte biology such as T lymphocyte egress from the thymus, proliferation, and apoptosis (1214). This report is the first to identify a mechanistic role for a TGFβ-inducible KLF in the silencing of FOXP3 and colitis susceptibility with a particular focus on discovering novel chromatin coupling events that regulate these processes.

Our investigation focuses on Polycomb-mediated responses. The Polycomb group chromatin-modifying protein complex (PcG) is a key chromatin remodeling complex, the role for which in lymphocyte gene regulation and biology remains to be fully understood. As opposed to the dynamic regulation of transcription by the activity of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases, PcG proteins lead to permanent silencing through the activity of histone methyltransferases (HMTs) (15). Recent studies indicate that site-specific recruitment of PcG to promoters occurs at least in part through Polycomb response elements. Polycomb response elements (PREs) have been defined extensively in Drosophila, but only recently in humans (16, 17). Interestingly, KLF binding sites are present in most well characterized PREs (16, 18), yet a role for this novel PcG-PRE mechanism in the regulation of T cell biology remains unexplored.

We have extended the recent observation that animals carrying a disruption in a KLF transcription factor (KLF10) are impaired in FOXP3 activation (19, 20) and provide here the first biochemical evidence revealing PcG silencing of FOXP3 as a default state in naïve lymphocytes, a state that must be overcome by KLF10 to achieve an inducible state. Moreover, we characterize at least one mechanism for reversing this process through antagonism by p300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF), a HAT recruited by KLF10 to the FOXP3 PRE imparting inducibility to this gene and the appropriate capacitation of Treg cells. The biological relevance of these mechanisms is underscored by the discovery that the KLF10-deficient animal is impaired in adaptive FOXP3+ Treg cell generation and develops severe experimentally induced colitis. Collectively, these results increase our understanding of the chromatin pathways key to the function of inducible genes in the immune system and specifically of mechanisms critical to the normal biology of adaptive Treg cells.


Bioinformatics Analysis

Gene expression and ChIP-seq data were curated from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, data set GSE14254 (21). CpG island prediction was performed using EMBOSS CPGPLOT at default values (22). Alignments constructed with the Geneious Alignment implemented in Geneious 5.4.6 (23), using a 65% similarity matrix and a gap opening and extension penalty of 12 and 3.

Isolation of Primary T Cells

Male mice were used for all experiments related to H3K27 methylation because of concerns regarding random inactivation of the X chromosome in females and the X-linked FOXP3 gene. Murine naïve CD4+ splenocytes were isolated using a combination of magnetic separation kits (Miltenyi Biotec). Sequential use of the CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell isolation kit and the CD4+CD62L+ T cell isolation kit resulted in naïve FOXP3-negative T cells used for in vitro induction of FOXP3. When using the B6.Cg-FOXP3tm2Tch/J mouse, flow cytometry was performed to sort for FOXP3-expressing cells. The cells were sorted on either a FACS Aria cell sorter running with FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences) or a FACS Vantage SE cell sorter running with CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Human naïve CD4+ cells were isolated from anonymous healthy blood donors also using a combination of Miltenyi Biotec beads. Once the CD4+ cells were negatively selected, a positive selection of the CD45RA+ cells yielded the naïve population of T cells.

Cell Stimulation

In vitro activation of the isolated T cells followed similar conditions among the different cell types. Anti-CD3, OKT3 (eBioscience) for the Jurkat cells, 145-2C11 (BD Biosciences) for the mouse T cells, and UCHT1 (BD Biosciences) for the human T cells was plate-bound at 2 μg/ml. Soluble anti-CD28 (BD Biosciences) at 2 μg/ml plus 100 units/ml IL-2 was added to the cultures throughout the incubation period. Human TGFβ-1 recombinant (AUSTRAL) at a concentration of 5 ng/ml was used to generate adaptive Treg cells.

RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and Quantitative Real Time PCR

Total RNA was isolated using the manufacturer protocol in the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized from 0.5–1 μg of total RNA with random primers using SuperScript® kit III First-Strand (Invitrogen). Two μl reverse transcription products were used for each real time PCR. PCRs were in 20 μl of total volume that contained primers and 10 μl of Express SYBR green ER quantitative PCR Supermaster mixes (Invitrogen).

For semiquantitative RT-PCR, genes of interest were amplified under the following conditions: initial denaturation, 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 34 cycles with denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 60 s, and extension at 72 °C for 60 s. All the PCR products were visualized by running 1.5% agarose gels electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining for the pictures.

Cloning of the FOXP3 Core Promoter and FOXP3 Core plus E1 Constructs

The human FOXP3 (NCBI AF235097) core promoter containing −511 bp from the transcription start site was amplified by PCR using FOXP3 promoter sequence-specific primers from position −511 to +176. The genomic DNA extracted from CD4+ T cells of a healthy donor was used as a template. The PCR product was subcloned in the pGL3 basic vector (Promega). Similarly, the FOXP3 core promoter plus the first enhancer (E1) in a continuous fragment containing −511 bp to +2738 was also amplified by PCR and subcloned in the pGL3 basic vector (Promega).

Construction of Flp Cell Line

Flp-In system (Invitrogen) was used for the generation of a stable human FOXP3 core promoter and FOXP core +E1 promoter Flp-In-Jurkat. Flp-In-Jurkat cells (Invitrogen) were co-transfected with FOXP3 core or FOXP3 core+E1 in pcDNA5/FLP recombination target vector and the FLP-recombinase vector (pOG44) (pOG44:FOXP3 core or FOXP3 core+E1/pcDNA5/FLP recombination target ratio = 9:1) resulting in a stable integration of the gene of interest at the FLP recombination target site in the genome. For the selective growth test, individual cells were grown in 24-well plates. The culture medium was supplemented with hygromycin at 250 or 100 μg/ml. An additional PRE deletion mutant was generated through deletion of the FOXP3 core element (−511 to +176, supplemental Fig. S1) from the FOXP3 core and FOXP3 core + E1 constructs and rederivation of Flp-In-Jurkat cell lines (Table 1).

FOXP3 ChIP Primers

ChIP Assays

ChIP assays were performed using a ChIP isolation kit (Millipore). One to two million Jurkat cells, or 1 × 105 to 5 × 105 murine or human naïve T cells were treated with 1% formaldehyde to cross-link histones to DNA. Fixed cells were sonicated to yield chromatin fragments of 200–1000 bp. Antibodies used in the ChIP assays included H3K27me3, p300, and acetyl-Histone H4 (Millipore) plus PCAF and CBP (Abcam). DNA was recovered by phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol extraction and ethanol precipitation with the addition of an inert carrier. Options for critically relevant control samples include total IgG or pre-enriched chromatin (input). We chose to control with pre-enriched chromatin because nonspecific IgG frequently does not control adequately for nonspecific cross-reactivity. Furthermore, the chromatin input generates a more accurate estimation of biases introduced through sonication of chromatin and subsequent PCR (24).

Transfection and Luciferase Assays

Two million FOXP3 core and FOXP3 core+E1 Flp Jurkat cells were transfected using the Amaxa cell line nucleofector kit V for Jurkat cells according to the optimized protocol provided with the kit. Two μg of plasmid DNA for EZH2, Suz12, and EED were used in the nucleofection procedure. Luciferase assays were done following the manufacturer's recommendations (Promega). For siRNA experiments, 600 nm total siRNA was used (300 nm scrambled + 300 nm targeted, ON-TARGET plus siRNA; Thermo Scientific Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO).

Adenoviral Transduction

Naïve T cells isolated from the CAR transgenic Balb/cJ[Tg]CARdelta1-[Tg]DO11.10 mice were activated for 48 h with either EV or EZH2 at a multiplicity of infection of 250. The cells were activated under the typical stimulation conditions for 7 days and processed through ChIP to determine methylation of H3K27 marks at the FOXP3 core promoter.

Plasmids and Recombinant Adenovirus

Standard molecular biology techniques were used to clone full-length EZH2, SUZ12, and EED into pcDNA3.1/His (Invitrogen). All of the constructs were verified by sequencing at the Mayo Clinic Molecular Biology Core Facility. Epitope-tagged (6XHis-XpressTM) EZH2, as well as empty vector (Ad5CMV), was generated as recombinant adenovirus in collaboration with the Gene Transfer Vector Core at the University of Iowa.

Mouse Strains

C57BL/6J and B6.Cg-FOXP3tm2Tch/J mice (“FOXP3-EGFP mice” co-express EGFP and FOXP3 under the control of the endogenous promoter) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. The CAR transgenic mouse was obtained through the NIAID Exchange Program of the National Institutes of Health: Balb/cJ[Tg]CARdelta1-[Tg]DO11.10 mouse line 4285 (25). KLF10−/− mice were kindly provided by Thomas C. Spelsberg (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) (26). All of the mice used in experiments were males of 8–20 weeks in age. The mice were age-matched in experiments comparing wild type with KLF10−/−. All animal work was done in accordance with the Mayo Clinic Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

DSS Colitis

The mice were given water supplemented with 3% dextran sulfate sodium salt for 5 days. The water was then replaced with normal drinking water for 3 more days prior to the mice being sacrificed for tissue removal for histology. Flow cytometry was utilized to look at levels of FOXP3 expression within the CD4+ population. Intracellular staining procedures for FOXP3 were followed using the application notes from Alexa Fluor® 488 anti-mouse/rat/human FOXP3 (BioLegend). The mice were weighed daily, and their colon lengths were determined during autopsy. The degree of colitis was quantified using three outcome variables: weight loss, colon histology, and a disease activity index. The disease activity index is an established clinical index of colitis severity encompassing clinical signs of colitis (wasting and hunching of the recipient mouse and the physical characteristics of stool) and an ordinal scale of colonic involvement (thickness and erythema) (27). The histologic activity index (maximal score = 10) includes: ulcer (0–1), crypt abscess (0–3), neutrophilic infiltrate (0–3), and thickening of the lamina propria (0–3) (27).

Statistical Methodology

Statistical analyses were performed using JMP version 9.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Descriptive analyses including means and standard deviations were performed in normally distributed data. t tests were used to compare means between two groups. Paired t tests were used to compare means between paired samples. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.


Evidence for the Existence of a KLF-containing PRE-like Motif within Mouse and Human FOXP3 Loci

Brown et al. (16, 18) recently reported that an Sp1/KLF binding site is present in the majority of Drosophila PREs. The mammalian DNA-binding, zinc finger transcription factor Yin Yang 1 (YY1), is the vertebrate orthologue to Drosophila Pho, which is one of the few pieces of Polycomb recruitment machinery conserved from fly to human. An additional binding element for GAGA factor has been demonstrated to cooperate with Pho at the PRE (28). Analysis of the first 1000 bp upstream from the transcription start site within the mouse FOXP3 promoter reveals consensus sequences for YY1, GAGA factor, and Sp1/KLF binding motifs (Fig. 1). Functional PREs tend to be flanked by YY1 binding sites and in association with CpG islands that also potentially influence recruitment of PcG complexes. CpG island analysis reveals the presence of a putative CpG island within ~5 kb from the transcription start site of the mouse FOXP3 promoter (data not shown). Pairwise alignment demonstrates a high degree of conservation between the mouse and human core promoter. Taken together, the combined predictive value of these multiple bioinformatic comparisons (pairwise alignment, cis-regulatory element analysis, and CpG prediction) led us to subsequently test the hypothesis that the PcG complex binds and potentially regulates FOXP3 and Treg adaptive responses.

Bioinformatics analysis predicts existence of KLF-PRE within mouse and human FOXP3 homologues. DNA-binding motifs were analyzed using consensus sequences defined above within the first 1 kb upstream of the transcription start site. The mouse consensus ...

The PRE-like Module from the FOXP3 Promoter Functionally Recruits the PcG HMT Pathway

Because PcG works at the epigenetic level, we created a T cell line with the putative FOXP3-associated PRE module integrated into the genome to test whether this region specifically recruits PcG proteins and silences reporter expression in this nonepisomal state. Using the FLP-recombinase system (FLP cell line; see “Experimental Procedures”) to allow genomic integration of a luciferase reporter construct, we generated a Jurkat FLP cell line expressing luciferase under the control of the CMV promoter either with (JFOXP3-FLP) or without (J-FLP) the putative FOXP3-associated PRE. The CMV promoter allows a basal level of expression on which to perform repression studies in a similar manner to the widely used Gal4-based reporter, an episomal repression system not optimal for epigenetic studies. Given the established role for a conserved nucleotide sequence downstream of the core promoter in the TGFβ-mediated induction of Treg cells (Enhancer 1) and the known role for KLF10 in this pathway (29), we also generated a Jurkat FLP cell line containing the core promoter plus the Enhancer 1 region (JFOXP3-E1 FLP, supplemental Fig. S1). To investigate the capacity for PcG complexes to silence the putative FOXP3-associated PRE, we transfected the FLP cell lines with the HMT, Enhancer of Zeste 2 (EZH2). EZH2 is the HMT most commonly associated with Polycomb repressor complex 2 (PRC2) and mediates repressor function through the trimethylation of histone 3 at the lysine 27 position (H3K27me3) (15). Transfection of EZH2 alone and particularly in conjunction with its obligate PRC2 complex partners (EZH2, Suz12, and EED) resulted in significant repression of luciferase activity in JFOXP3-E1 FLP (percentage of repression = 45 ± 22.4% and 66 ± 13.7%, mean and S.D., respectively) but not J-FLP cells in which the PRE element has been deleted (percentage of repression = −15 ± 35.8% and 10 ± 14.6%, mean and S.D. respectively) (Fig. 2a). Similar results were seen in the JFOXP3-FLP cell line lacking the E1 region (supplemental Fig. S2). Overexpression of Brahma and BRG1 (Brahma-related gene 1), both members of the chromatin remodeling Trithorax SWI/SNF family associated with gene activation and PRC antagonism, did not affect luciferase expression in this system and thus serve as relevant control chromatin modifying proteins (supplemental Fig. S2). Seven days post-transfection (three cell division cycles), genomic DNA was isolated and subjected to ChIP to confirm the presence of H3K27me3 marks correlating with the functional outcome of reduced luciferase expression. Fig. 2b demonstrates H3K27me3 marks occupying the FOXP3 core promoter region upon overexpression of the PRC2 complex (2.6-fold change over cells transfected with empty vector; Fig. 2b). Thus, using a human lymphocyte cell line, we demonstrate that the FOXP3 PRE-like module recruits the PRC2 complex and silences FOXP3 gene expression. Together, these experiments demonstrate that the FOXP3 promoter has the functional properties expected of a PRE. Although the mechanistic novelty of a PRE-like module on the inducible FOXP3 promoter is clear, we sought to extend these important observations to primary T cells.

PRC2 complex silences the FOXP3 core promoter. a, luciferase counts represented relative to empty vector control (pcDNA, open bar) upon transfection of EZH2 alone or the entire PRC2 complex EZH2, Suz12, and EED (E/S/E). Identical analysis in the J-FLP ...

To evaluate the role of the HMT EZH2 in the regulation of FOXP3 expression in primary T cells, we utilized an adenoviral expression system transduced into a mouse line transgenically expressing the adenoviral receptor (CAR transgenic mouse; Taconic, model 4285). Naïve CD4+ splenocytes were isolated from the CAR transgenic mouse and infected with EZH2 or control empty virus. In these experiments, EZH2 overexpression leads to increased levels of H3K27 methylation at the FOXP3 core promoter (Fig. 2c). Importantly, primary naïve murine CD4+ lymphocytes transduced with EZH2 do not express FOXP3 upon stimulation when compared with cells transduced with empty vector (7.6% FOXP3+ cells versus 72.4% FOXP3+ cells; Fig. 2d), indicating that recruitment of EZH2 to the FOXP3 core promoter results in specific and persistent silencing of FOXP3 expression. Thus, these data demonstrate that the FOXP3 promoter displays both structural and functional properties similar to the well characterized Drosophila KLF-containing PRE sites including the ancestral relative forkhead.

Promoter Occupation and Histone-K27 Methylation by PRC2 Is the Defining Feature of the Silenced State of the FOXP3 Promoter

As the overexpression system of Fig. 2 suggested the PRC2 complex to be one mechanism of FOXP3 gene silencing, we aimed to validate these results in vivo using an established FOXP3 reporter mouse. We initially examined the chromatin landscape of the FOXP3 gene and the differentiation of adaptive Treg cells for evidence of histone marks that reflect an operational PRC2 methyltransferase system. Primary T cell populations isolated from the spleen of the FOXP3-EGFP expressing mouse were sorted for CD62L and FOXP3 (on the basis of EGFP expression). Both naïve (CD62L high) and antigen experienced (CD62L low) populations of FOXP3-negative T cells displayed an enrichment of H3K27me3 marks on the FOXP3 promoter (1.8 ± 0.4 and 2.5 ± 0.7-fold difference in optical density over FOXP3-expressing CD62L high and CD62L low cells, respectively; mean/S.D.; Fig. 3a, left panel). These data suggest that H3K27me3 marks the silenced state of the inducible gene FOXP3. To test this model in vitro, we isolated naïve FOXP3− T cells and induced FOXP3 gene transcription. Fourteen days post-induction FOXP3-expressing (EGFP-positive) or FOXP3-negative (EGFP-negative) cells were isolated by FACS. DNA from each cell population was subjected to ChIP assay using specific antibodies against the H3K27me3 mark and the HMT, EZH2. Congruent with the in vivo findings, FOXP3 induction in adaptive Treg cells was associated with minimal H3K27me3 marks, whereas the persistent absence of FOXP3 expression associated with both H3K27me3 marks and the presence of EZH2 (2.1 ± 1.0-fold change in H3K27me3 marks (Fig. 3b) and 1.8 ± 0.5-fold change in EZH2 occupancy (Fig. 3c) as compared with FOXP3-expressing activated cells; mean/S.D.). These data using optical density were confirmed using quantitative real time PCR as a second methodology of quantification (Fig. 3, right panels). Thus, PRC2-mediated trimethylation of H3K27, which occurs at the newly identified PRE-like cis-regulatory module, appears to define the silenced state of the FOXP3 promoter. These results indicate that PRC2-mediated silencing behaves as a default mechanism for keeping FOXP3 silenced until the moment of its induction. To better understand how the FOXP3 promoter changes from this silenced to its induced state, we designed subsequent experiments to address the identity of the chromatin pathways capable of reversing the effects of PRC2, initiate FOXP3 activation, and facilitate the differentiation of progenitors into immunocompetent Treg cells.

Histone methylation marks associated with PRC2 complex predict FOXP3 expression in primary CD4+ lymphocytes. a, inset gel, left panel, representative DNA gel for PCR analysis of the expression of FOXP3 in cell fractions post-immunoprecipitation for H3K27 ...

Antagonism of PRC2 Function by a KLF-PCAF Pathway Marks the Beginning of the Inducible Phase of the FOXP3 Promoter

Both histone acetylation and H3 K4 methylation, with few exceptions, are associated with gene activation (30, 31). Indeed, bivalent modification with H3 K4 and H3 K27 methylation has been described on promoters of inducible, T cell-specific genes (31). It is not clear how the bivalent state primes genes for activation in a sequence-specific manner. Given the established KLF binding site within the FOXP3 promoter and the association of HATs with KLF family members, we investigated whether a KLF-dependent recruitment of HAT(s) antagonize the PRC2-induced silenced state leading to FOXP3 activation. Appreciation for the significance of histone acetylation has been advanced through the identification of the GCN5 family of HATs, many of which, particularly CBP, p300, and PCAF (p300/CBP-associated factor), have been described to interact with KLF family members (32, 33). Although histone acetylation events have been described on the activated FOXP3 core promoter, mechanistic insight into the sequence-specific recruitment and identity of precise HATs is lacking (34). In Fig. 4a, we demonstrate marked H4 acetylation of the FOXP3 core promoter upon activation of murine primary T cells (8-fold induction over unstimulated cells). This acetylation event is associated with the recruitment of PCAF to the FOXP3 core promoter (7-fold induction over unstimulated cells; Fig. 4a). Experiments designed to study the additional HAT enzymes CBP and p300 did not support its functional association with this process (Fig. 4a and supplemental Fig. S3). Similar results were demonstrated using primary human naïve CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4b and supplemental Fig. S3), indicating that the PCAF-induced activation of the FOXP3 core promoter is conserved between mice and humans.

Activation of the FOXP3 core promoter is associated with histone 4 acetylation and the histone acetyltransferase PCAF. a, quantitative real time PCR analysis of the expression of FOXP3 in cell fractions post-immunoprecipitation for histone 3 and histone ...

Potential antagonism between the PCAF and PRC2 pathways was further explored in two experimental sets. First, we overexpressed the HMT EZH2 in primary naïve murine T cells and activated the cells to induce FOXP3 as in Fig. 2, above. After 5 days of stimulation, in the setting of EZH2 overexpression, the core promoter region of FOXP3 fails to recruit PCAF and congruently, lacks histone acetylation events (Fig. 4c). Second, we performed overexpression assays of both EZH2 and PCAF in the genome-integrated FLP cell line to directly measure antagonism in this system in an experimental context in which either endogenous PCAF or EZH2 had been silenced by siRNA. These experiments show that EZH2 knockdown leads to enhanced promoter activation in the presence of PCAF (percentage of enhancement = 32.7 ± 7.02%, mean and S.D., respectively; p < 0.05; Fig. 4d) and conversely, knockdown of PCAF leads to enhanced repression (percentage of repression = 26 ± 5.57%, mean and S.D. respectively; p < 0.05; Fig. 4d). Using the genome integrated cell line in which the PRE has been deleted, we demonstrate lack of regulation of either PCAF or EZH2 in this model system (Fig. 4e), further substantiating an antagonistic role for these chromatin modifying proteins on the FOXP3 core promoter.

Thus, PCAF, a prominent chromatin-modifying enzyme appears responsible for antagonizing the silencing effects of PRC2 on FOXP3. Collectively, this experimental set demonstrates that the region of the FOXP3 promoter containing the PRE-like cis-regulatory module utilizes the HMT, EZH2, or the HAT, PCAF, to turn off and on the promoter, imparting characteristic inducibility to this gene. These data then led to additional experiments to define the mechanisms underlying the sequence-specific recruitment of the chromatin-modifying protein complexes to the core FOXP3 promoter.

Role of Kruppel-like Factor 10 in the Regulation of the FOXP3 KLF-PRE Domain

The presence and chromatin recruitment activity of the FOXP3 KLF-PRE module suggested that, similar to Drosophila, human Kruppel-like factor proteins are involved in the functional regulation of these elements. Recent results suggested that KLF10 modification by the E3 ubiquitin ligase itch was important for adaptive Treg differentiation (19). This observation made KLF10 an attractive candidate as a key regulator of the FOXP3 PRE function. Subsequently, we tested the role for KLF10 in the epigenetic regulation of FOXP3. Using the predicted KLF binding site on the human and mouse core FOXP3 promoter as a guide, we designed primer pairs for ChIP-based promoter occupancy assays. The results from these experiments demonstrated that KLF10 readily binds to the KLF-PRE on the core FOXP3 promoter in both murine and human primary CD4+ T cells (Fig. 5a). This observation that FOXP3 is a direct target for both PRC2 and KLF10 supports the concept that the KLF-PRE domain displays both structural and functional properties conserved from Drosophila forkhead to its human orthologue, FOXP3. Using the KLF10 deficient mouse (KLF10−/−), we next determined the importance of KLF10 to the chromatin remodeling events required for FOXP3 promoter activation.

KLF10, present on the core promoter, recruits PCAF-mediated histone acetylation of the FOXP3 core promoter and relieves H3K27 methylation. a, DNA gel for PCR using FOXP3 specific primers in samples post-precipitation for KLF10 in murine naïve ...

In the resting state, KLF10−/− CD4+ naïve lymphocytes display increased levels of H3K27 trimethylation (3.39 ± 1.5-fold change over naïve wild type lymphocytes, mean/S.D.; Fig. 5b). These data were confirmed using quantitative real time PCR as a second methodology of quantification (Fig. 5b, right panel). Activated KLF10−/− T cells retain H3K27 trimethylation marks (Fig. 5c) and fail to up-regulate FOXP3 (48.2% FOXP3+ versus 20.7% FOXP3+, wild type versus KLF10−/−; Fig. 5d). No significant differences were seen in H3K4 methylation between wild type and KLF10−/− T cells (data not shown). Thus, we focused our investigation on the acetylation events identified above. Upon activation, KLF10−/− T cells fail to recruit PCAF to the FOXP3 promoter and acetylate histone 4, suggesting a key role for KLF10 in this activation process (Fig. 5e). Thus, the KLF site present in this cis-domain functions as a switch to transition from its silenced to its activated state using antagonistic histone-modifying complexes that ultimately impart the full inducibility to FOXP3. Furthermore, KLF10 is the first member of the KLF family of proteins thus far reported to work with PRC2 outside of Drosophila genes, suggesting that these transcription factors have undergone evolutionary pressure to maintain their role in the recruitment of K27 HMT complexes. We subsequently tested the impact of this pathway to the in vivo function of adaptive Treg cells at the whole organism level by characterizing the behavior of KLF10−/− animals during experimentally induced colitis.

Disruption of the KLF-PRE Mechanism Results in Failure of Adaptive Treg Cells and Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Vivo

Recent data demonstrated a paucity of FOXP3+ T cells within peripheral lymph nodes in KLF10−/− mice (19). We extended this observation to include the important compartments of induced Treg cells, the mesenteric lymph nodes, and the lamina propria. Fig. 6a demonstrates that KLF10−/− mice have a significant reduction in FOXP3+ lymphocytes in both the mesenteric lymph nodes and the lamina propria (46 ± 4.5% and 45 ± 4.5%, mean reduction and standard deviation, respectively). In addition, ex vivo studies confirm that KLF10−/− naïve CD4+ T cells display a block in FOXP3 induction by TGFβ, further supporting a role for this Sp1-like transcription factor in regulating the function of this key immunoregulatory transcription factor (Fig. 6b) (19). Because inducible FOXP3+ Treg cells are common to the intestine (a TGFβ-rich milieu) and widely believed to be an important contributor to intestinal inflammatory control mechanisms, we tested whether these animals have heightened susceptibility to unmitigated intestinal inflammatory responses. Indeed, the functional relevance of KLF10 to inducible Treg cells is supported by the heightened sensitivity of the KLF10−/− mice to dextran sulfate-induced colitis. Fig. 7 demonstrates enhanced weight loss (10 ± 2.8% weight loss in KLF10−/− DSS-treated animals compared with 5.5 ± 0.9% weight loss in wild type DSS-treated animals), disease activity score (4.5 ± 1.1 versus 1.42 ± 0.6, mean ± S.D.), and histologic activity score (5 ± 3.3 versus 2 ± 2.4, mean ± S.D.) within the KLF10-deficient group when compared with wild type mice upon exposure to DSS for 5 days. Representative histologic section demonstrates intense lymphocytic infiltration with ulceration in the colon of KLF10-deficient mice compared with wild type animals (Fig. 7, d and e). Thus, the current study defines for the first time that a KLF-containing PRE-like motif present in the FOXP3 promoter significantly contributes to the inducibility of this gene. Of similar importance, we demonstrate that impairment of this mechanism leads to abnormalities in adaptive Treg development, particularly in the intestine and resultant colitis susceptibility. Furthermore, these studies establish a role for an evolutionarily conserved PcG/HAT mechanism for the regulation of normal cell biology in organisms ranging from Drosophila to human. When altered, this mechanism results in cell dysfunction underlying complex immunological disorders such as colitis.

Adaptive Treg cells fail to develop in the KLF10-deficient mouse. a, flow cytometric analysis of splenocytes, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) and lamina propria lymphocytes (LPL) for FOXP3+ cells. The histograms represent FOXP3+ cells expressed as percentages ...
KLF10-deficient mice exhibit extreme susceptibility to DSS colitis. a–c, tabulation of weight change (a), clinical disease activity scores (b), and histologic disease activity index (c) in DSS-exposed (closed symbols) versus water-fed (open symbols ...


The major finding of this study is the novel definition of a PRE on the core promoter of the inducible gene, FOXP3. The significance of this finding is the functional relevance of KLF-dependent PRC2 recruitment to the FOXP3 core, the development of T regulatory cells, and the impact on chronic intestinal inflammation.

A KLF-PRE Exists within Forkhead (Drosophila melanogaster) and Its Mammalian Homologue, FOXP3

The polycomb group proteins PRC1 and PRC2 are members of a gene silencing complex best defined in the long term silencing of the Hox gene cluster of Drosophila (17). Most PcG proteins do not possess a DNA-binding domain; thus, it is widely accepted that the DNA-binding protein YY1, which binds in complex to both PRC1 and PRC2 may provide sequence-specific DNA binding activity to PcG complexes (17, 3537). The importance of the mechanisms of PcG gene silencing is clearly appreciated, yet the gene-specific recruitment events are not well understood. Early studies in Drosophila identified the importance of both Kruppel and Polycomb as critically relevant to regulation of the homeotic gene Scr (Sex combs reduced) (38). Subsequent work on a homeotic gene within the bithorax complex Abdominal-B provided evidence for a generalized model of gap gene products (Kruppel) promoting stable silencing through Polycomb in homeotic Drosophila genes (39). Building upon the recent observation that the majority of PREs have KLF binding sites, the data provide evidence in support of a conserved mechanism.

Further support for an evolutionarily conserved mechanism for the regulation of FOXP3 by a KLF-PRE domain exists in a publically available ChIP-sequencing (ChIP-seq) database. Wei et al. (21) investigated alterations in gene expression with simultaneous ChIP-seq mapping of histone modifications (H3-K4me3 and H3-K27me3) during the differentiation of CD4+ T cells. FOXP3 is identified among a subset of genes that demonstrate concurrent increased expression with reductions in H3K27 trimethylation. Surprisingly, a number of other FOX proteins appear in the data set in addition to FOXP3, including FOXM1, FOXJ1, FOXP4, and FOXK1, further supporting the concepts of evolutionary-conserved regulation of these genes described in this study (supplemental Fig. S4) (21).

The PRE-like Module from the FOXP3 Promoter Functionally Recruits the PRC2 HMT Pathway

Our experiments demonstrate the presence of both the characteristic histone marks and PRC2 complex members on the silenced core promoter of FOXP3. Furthermore, we demonstrate functional relevance of PRC2 to FOXP3 gene silencing in an overexpression system. The function of PcG members in T cells is poorly understood. There is limited, conflicting data largely focused on cytokine promoters of differentiated T cell phenotypes. Of the limited published data, most focus on a role for PRC1 complex members (primarily BMI-1) on the GATA-3 driven, IL-4 producing, Th2 profile. Although evidence exists demonstrating a role for PRC1 members BMI-1 and Mel-18 in promoting stability of the Th2 phenotype (4042), more recent data suggest a largely repressive effect maintained by the interaction of PRC1 and an upstream promoter region of the GATA-3 gene (43). These discordant data likely reflect the utmost importance of context-dependent recruitment and the potential for disparate complex function dependent upon precise PcG members.

Antagonism of PRC2 Function by a KLF-PCAF Pathway Marks the Beginning of the Inducible Phase of the FOXP3 Promoter

Histone acetylation events associated with FOXP3 gene activation and the induction of FOXP3 with histone deacetylation inhibitors is well established (29, 4447); however, definition of particular histone acetyltransferase proteins or the mechanism of site-specific HAT recruitment is unknown. We report the requirement for KLF10 and the recruitment of the HAT, PCAF, to be critically important for FOXP3 expression. Of interest, work in Drosophila has associated histone acetylation to temporal-spatial expression of the Hox gene locus (48, 49). The evolutionary predecessor of PCAF in Drosophila is GCN5, and indeed GCN5 has been linked to Hox gene regulation in murine skeletal development (50). We therefore speculate that the novel mechanistic observation of recruitment of PCAF to the FOXP3 core promoter through KLF-PRE may represent an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of FOXP3 gene regulation.

Disruption of the KLF-PRE Mechanism Results in Failure of Adaptive Treg Cells and Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Vivo

A functional impairment in generation of TGFβ induced adaptive Treg cells has previously been described in the KLF10-deficient animal (19). The data put forth defined a role for the post-translational modification (ubiquitination) of KLF10 by the E3 ubiquitin ligase, ITCH, resulting in a gain of function in the transcriptional activity of the FOXP3 gene (19). The results of this paper extend these observations to the function of KLF10 on FOXP3 transcription at the level of the chromatin. In the absence of KLF10, PCAF is not recruited to the silenced promoter, resulting in a lack of H4 acetylation and a persistent block in FOXP3 gene transcription. The association of KLF proteins with E3 ubiquitin ligases is worthy of further investigation because PcG complexes contain E3 ubiquitin ligase activity (51), and a conserved regulatory domain (R3 domain) of KLF10 consists of WW domains that bind prototypical E3 ubiquitin ligases in hybridization assays.4


A KLF-PRE exists within forkhead (D. melanogaster) and its mammalian homologue, FOXP3. The PRE-like module from the FOXP3 promoter functionally recruits the PRC2 HMT pathway. Antagonism of PRC2 function by the GCN5 orthologue PCAF marks the beginning of the inducible phase of the FOXP3 promoter. Integrating these experimental discoveries with existing literature from Drosophila suggests an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of FOXP3 (Drosophila, Forkhead) regulation through EZH2 (Drosophila, E(z)) recruitment antagonized by PCAF (Drosophila, GCN5) in a KLF-dependent (Drosophila, Kruppel) fashion. Disruption of the KLF-PRE mechanism results in failure of adaptive Treg cells and inflammatory bowel disease in vivo. Because the KLF-PRE likely binds additional KLF family members, further characterization of the molecular interactions between PcG, KLF family members, and PCAF may lead to novel therapeutic strategies in human immune-mediated disease.

*This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant AI89714-R01.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpgThis article contains supplemental Figs. S1–S4.

4Y. Xiong, S. Khanna, A. L. Grzenda, O. F. Sarmento, P. A. Svingen, G. A. Lomberk, R. A. Urrutia, and W. A. Faubion, Jr., unpublished observations.

3The abbreviations used are:

T regulatory
Kruppel-like factor
CREB-binding protein
cAMP-responsive element-binding protein
Polycomb group chromatin-modifying protein complex
histone acetyltransferase
histone methyltransferase
Polycomb response element
p300/CBP-associated factor
dextran sulfate sodium
Polycomb repressor complex.


1. Curotto de Lafaille M. A., Lafaille J. J. (2009) Natural and adaptive foxp3+ regulatory T cells. More of the same or a division of labor? Immunity 30, 626–635 [PubMed]
2. Chen W., Jin W., Hardegen N., Lei K. J., Li L., Marinos N., McGrady G., Wahl S. M. (2003) Conversion of peripheral CD4+CD25− naive T cells to CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells by TGF-β induction of transcription factor Foxp3. J. Exp. Med. 198, 1875–1886 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Li M. O., Sanjabi S., Flavell R. A. (2006) Transforming growth factor-β controls development, homeostasis, and tolerance of T cells by regulatory T cell-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Immunity 25, 455–471 [PubMed]
4. Li M. O., Wan Y. Y., Flavell R. A. (2007) T cell-produced transforming growth factor-beta1 controls T cell tolerance and regulates Th1- and Th17-cell differentiation. Immunity 26, 579–591 [PubMed]
5. Marie J. C., Letterio J. J., Gavin M., Rudensky A. Y. (2005) TGF-β1 maintains suppressor function and Foxp3 expression in CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 201, 1061–1067 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Faria A. M., Weiner H. L. (2005) Oral tolerance. Immunol. Rev. 206, 232–259 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. van der Vliet H. J., Nieuwenhuis E. E. (2007) IPEX as a result of mutations in FOXP3. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2007, 89017. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Kleinschek M. A., Boniface K., Sadekova S., Grein J., Murphy E. E., Turner S. P., Raskin L., Desai B., Faubion W. A., de Waal Malefyt R., Pierce R. H., McClanahan T., Kastelein R. A. (2009) Circulating and gut-resident human Th17 cells express CD161 and promote intestinal inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 206, 525–534 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Hue S., Ahern P., Buonocore S., Kullberg M. C., Cua D. J., McKenzie B. S., Powrie F., Maloy K. J. (2006) Interleukin-23 drives innate and T cell-mediated intestinal inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 203, 2473–2483 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Ghaleb A. M., Nandan M. O., Chanchevalap S., Dalton W. B., Hisamuddin I. M., Yang V. W. (2005) Krüppel-like factors 4 and 5. The yin and yang regulators of cellular proliferation. Cell Res 15, 92–96 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Safe S., Abdelrahim M. (2005) Sp transcription factor family and its role in cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 41, 2438–2448 [PubMed]
12. Wu J., Lingrel J. B. (2005) Krüppel-like factor 2, a novel immediate-early transcriptional factor, regulates IL-2 expression in T lymphocyte activation. J. Immunol. 175, 3060–3066 [PubMed]
13. Carlson C. M., Endrizzi B. T., Wu J., Ding X., Weinreich M. A., Walsh E. R., Wani M. A., Lingrel J. B., Hogquist K. A., Jameson S. C. (2006) Kruppel-like factor 2 regulates thymocyte and T-cell migration. Nature 442, 299–302 [PubMed]
14. Zhou M., McPherson L., Feng D., Song A., Dong C., Lyu S. C., Zhou L., Shi X., Ahn Y. T., Wang D., Clayberger C., Krensky A. M. (2007) Kruppel-like transcription factor 13 regulates T lymphocyte survival in vivo. J. Immunol. 178, 5496–5504 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Cao R., Wang L., Wang H., Xia L., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Jones R. S., Zhang Y. (2002) Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science 298, 1039–1043 [PubMed]
16. Brown J. L., Grau D. J., DeVido S. K., Kassis J. A. (2005) An Sp1/KLF binding site is important for the activity of a Polycomb group response element from the Drosophila engrailed gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 5181–5189 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Woo C. J., Kharchenko P. V., Daheron L., Park P. J., Kingston R. E. (2010) A region of the human HOXD cluster that confers polycomb-group responsiveness. Cell 140, 99–110 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Brown J. L., Kassis J. A. (2010) Spps, a Drosophila Sp1/KLF family member, binds to PREs and is required for PRE activity late in development. Development 137, 2597–2602 [PubMed]
19. Venuprasad K., Huang H., Harada Y., Elly C., Subramaniam M., Spelsberg T., Su J., Liu Y. C. (2008) The E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch regulates expression of transcription factor Foxp3 and airway inflammation by enhancing the function of transcription factor TIEG1. Nat. Immunol. 9, 245–253 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Cao Z., Wara A. K., Icli B., Sun X., Packard R. R., Esen F., Stapleton C. J., Subramaniam M., Kretschmer K., Apostolou I., von Boehmer H., Hansson G. K., Spelsberg T. C., Libby P., Feinberg M. W. (2009) Kruppel-like factor KLF10 targets transforming growth factor-beta1 to regulate CD4+CD25− T cells and T regulatory cells. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 24914–24924 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Wei G., Wei L., Zhu J., Zang C., Hu-Li J., Yao Z., Cui K., Kanno Y., Roh T. Y., Watford W. T., Schones D. E., Peng W., Sun H. W., Paul W. E., O'Shea J. J., Zhao K. (2009) Global mapping of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 reveals specificity and plasticity in lineage fate determination of differentiating CD4+ T cells. Immunity 30, 155–167 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Larsen F., Gundersen G., Lopez R., Prydz H. (1992) CpG islands as gene markers in the human genome. Genomics 13, 1095–1107 [PubMed]
23. Drummond A. J., Ashton B., Buxton S., Cheung M., Cooper A., Duran C., Field M., Heled J., Kearse M., Markowitz S., Moir R., Stones-Havas S., S., S., Thierer T., Wilson A. (2011) Geneious v5.4
24. Northrup D. L., Zhao K. (2011) Application of ChIP-Seq and related techniques to the study of immune function. Immunity 34, 830–842 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Wan Y. Y., Leon R. P., Marks R., Cham C. M., Schaack J., Gajewski T. F., DeGregori J. (2000) Transgenic expression of the coxsackie/adenovirus receptor enables adenoviral-mediated gene delivery in naive T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 13784–13789 [PubMed]
26. Subramaniam M., Gorny G., Johnsen S. A., Monroe D. G., Evans G. L., Fraser D. G., Rickard D. J., Rasmussen K., van Deursen J. M., Turner R. T., Oursler M. J., Spelsberg T. C. (2005) TIEG1 null mouse-derived osteoblasts are defective in mineralization and in support of osteoclast differentiation in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 1191–1199 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Faubion W. A., De Jong Y. P., Molina A. A., Ji H., Clarke K., Wang B., Mizoguchi E., Simpson S. J., Bhan A. K., Terhorst C. (2004) Colitis is associated with thymic destruction attenuating CD4+25+ regulatory T cells in the periphery. Gastroenterology 126, 1759–1770 [PubMed]
28. Mahmoudi T., Zuijderduijn L. M., Mohd-Sarip A., Verrijzer C. P. (2003) GAGA facilitates binding of Pleiohomeotic to a chromatinized Polycomb response element. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 4147–4156 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Tone Y., Furuuchi K., Kojima Y., Tykocinski M. L., Greene M. I., Tone M. (2008) Smad3 and NFAT cooperate to induce Foxp3 expression through its enhancer. Nat. Immunol. 9, 194–202 [PubMed]
30. Bhaumik S. R., Smith E., Shilatifard A. (2007) Covalent modifications of histones during development and disease pathogenesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1008–1016 [PubMed]
31. Roh T. Y., Cuddapah S., Cui K., Zhao K. (2006) The genomic landscape of histone modifications in human T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 15782–15787 [PubMed]
32. Song C. Z., Keller K., Chen Y., Stamatoyannopoulos G. (2003) Functional interplay between CBP and PCAF in acetylation and regulation of transcription factor KLF13 activity. J. Mol. Biol. 329, 207–215 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Song A., Patel A., Thamatrakoln K., Liu C., Feng D., Clayberger C., Krensky A. M. (2002) Functional domains and DNA-binding sequences of RFLAT-1/KLF13, a Krüppel-like transcription factor of activated T lymphocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 30055–30065 [PubMed]
34. Liu Z., Zhang C., Sun J. (2010) Deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A down-regulates Foxp3 expression and reduces CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 400, 409–412 [PubMed]
35. Brown J. L., Mucci D., Whiteley M., Dirksen M. L., Kassis J. A. (1998) The Drosophila Polycomb group gene pleiohomeotic encodes a DNA binding protein with homology to the transcription factor YY1. Mol. Cell 1, 1057–1064 [PubMed]
36. Ko C. Y., Hsu H. C., Shen M. R., Chang W. C., Wang J. M. (2008) Epigenetic silencing of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein delta activity by YY1/polycomb group/DNA methyltransferase complex. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 30919–30932 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Wilkinson F. H., Park K., Atchison M. L. (2006) Polycomb recruitment to DNA in vivo by the YY1 REPO domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 19296–19301 [PubMed]
38. Riley P. D., Carroll S. B., Scott M. P. (1987) The expression and regulation of sex combs reduced protein in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 1, 716–730 [PubMed]
39. Casares F., Sánchez-Herrero E. (1995) Regulation of the infraabdominal regions of the bithorax complex of Drosophila by gap genes. Development 121, 1855–1866 [PubMed]
40. Hosokawa H., Kimura M. Y., Shinnakasu R., Suzuki A., Miki T., Koseki H., van Lohuizen M., Yamashita M., Nakayama T. (2006) Regulation of Th2 cell development by Polycomb group gene bmi-1 through the stabilization of GATA3. J. Immunol. 177, 7656–7664 [PubMed]
41. Kimura M., Koseki Y., Yamashita M., Watanabe N., Shimizu C., Katsumoto T., Kitamura T., Taniguchi M., Koseki H., Nakayama T. (2001) Regulation of Th2 cell differentiation by mel-18, a mammalian polycomb group gene. Immunity 15, 275–287 [PubMed]
42. Miyazaki M., Kawamoto H., Kato Y., Itoi M., Miyazaki K., Masuda K., Tashiro S., Ishihara H., Igarashi K., Amagai T., Kanno R., Kanno M. (2005) Polycomb group gene mel-18 regulates early T progenitor expansion by maintaining the expression of Hes-1, a target of the Notch pathway. J. Immunol. 174, 2507–2516 [PubMed]
43. Onodera A., Yamashita M., Endo Y., Kuwahara M., Tofukuji S., Hosokawa H., Kanai A., Suzuki Y., Nakayama T. (2010) STAT6-mediated displacement of polycomb by trithorax complex establishes long-term maintenance of GATA3 expression in T helper type 2 cells. J. Exp. Med. 207, 2493–2506 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Lal G., Zhang N., van der Touw W., Ding Y., Ju W., Bottinger E. P., Reid S. P., Levy D. E., Bromberg J. S. (2009) Epigenetic regulation of Foxp3 expression in regulatory T cells by DNA methylation. J. Immunol. 182, 259–273 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Li B., Samanta A., Song X., Iacono K. T., Bembas K., Tao R., Basu S., Riley J. L., Hancock W. W., Shen Y., Saouaf S. J., Greene M. I. (2007) FOXP3 interactions with histone acetyltransferase and class II histone deacetylases are required for repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 4571–4576 [PubMed]
46. Tao R., de Zoeten E. F., Ozkaynak E., Chen C., Wang L., Porrett P. M., Li B., Turka L. A., Olson E. N., Greene M. I., Wells A. D., Hancock W. W. (2007) Deacetylase inhibition promotes the generation and function of regulatory T cells. Nat. Med. 13, 1299–1307 [PubMed]
47. Wang L., Tao R., Hancock W. W. (2009) Using histone deacetylase inhibitors to enhance Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell function and induce allograft tolerance. Immunol. Cell Biol. 87, 195–202 [PubMed]
48. Fujimura Y., Isono K., Vidal M., Endoh M., Kajita H., Mizutani-Koseki Y., Takihara Y., van Lohuizen M., Otte A., Jenuwein T., Deschamps J., Koseki H. (2006) Distinct roles of Polycomb group gene products in transcriptionally repressed and active domains of Hoxb8. Development 133, 2371–2381 [PubMed]
49. Rastegar M., Kobrossy L., Kovacs E. N., Rambaldi I., Featherstone M. (2004) Sequential histone modifications at Hoxd4 regulatory regions distinguish anterior from posterior embryonic compartments. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 8090–8103 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Lin W., Zhang Z., Chen C. H., Behringer R. R., Dent S. Y. (2008) Proper Gcn5 histone acetyltransferase expression is required for normal anteroposterior patterning of the mouse skeleton. Dev. Growth Differ. 50, 321–330 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Wang H., Wang L., Erdjument-Bromage H., Vidal M., Tempst P., Jones R. S., Zhang Y. (2004) Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing. Nature 431, 873–878 [PubMed]
52. Yant S. R., Zhu W., Millinoff D., Slightom J. L., Goodman M., Gumucio D. L. (1995) High affinity YY1 binding motifs. Identification of two core types (ACAT and CCAT) and distribution of potential binding sites within the human beta globin cluster. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 4353–4362 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Sing A., Pannell D., Karaiskakis A., Sturgeon K., Djabali M., Ellis J., Lipshitz H. D., Cordes S. P. (2009) A vertebrate Polycomb response element governs segmentation of the posterior hindbrain. Cell 138, 885–897 [PubMed]
54. McConnell B. B., Yang V. W. (2010) Mammalian Krüppel-like factors in health and diseases. Physiol. Rev. 90, 1337–1381 [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology