PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcmicrBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Microbiology
 
BMC Microbiol. 2012; 12: 75.
Published online May 17, 2012. doi:  10.1186/1471-2180-12-75
PMCID: PMC3463448
Genotypic characterization and safety assessment of lactic acid bacteria from indigenous African fermented food products
David B Adimpong,corresponding author1,2 Dennis S Nielsen,1 Kim I Sørensen,2 Patrick MF Derkx,2 and Lene Jespersen1
1Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Life Sciences, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
2Chr-Hansen A/S, 10–12 Bøge Allé, DK-2970, Hørsholm, Denmark
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
David B Adimpong: dadimpong/at/life.ku.dk; Dennis S Nielsen: dn/at/life.ku.dk; Kim I Sørensen: dkksr/at/chr-hansen.com; Patrick MF Derkx: dkpde/at/chr-hansen.com; Lene Jespersen: lj/at/life.ku.dk
Received September 15, 2011; Accepted May 17, 2012.
Abstract
Background
Indigenous fermented food products play an essential role in the diet of millions of Africans. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the predominant microbial species in African indigenous fermented food products and are used for different applications in the food and biotechnology industries. Numerous studies have described antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of LAB from different parts of the world. However, there is limited information on antimicrobial resistance profiles of LAB from Africa. The aim of this study was to characterize 33 LAB previously isolated from three different African indigenous fermented food products using (GTG)5-based rep-PCR, sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and species-specific PCR techniques for differentiation of closely related species and further evaluate their antibiotic resistance profiles by the broth microdilution method and their haemolytic activity on sheep blood agar plates as indicators of safety traits among these bacteria.
Results
Using molecular biology based methods and selected phenotypic tests such as catalase reaction, CO2 production from glucose, colonies and cells morphology, the isolates were identified as Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus ghanensis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus salivarius, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, Pediococcus acidilactici, Pediococcus pentosaceus and Weissella confusa. The bacteria were susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin and erythromycin but resistant to vancomycin, kanamycin and streptomycin. Variable sensitivity profiles to tetracycline and gentamicin was observed among the isolates with Lb. plantarum, Lb. salivarius, W. confusa (except strain SK9-5) and Lb. fermentum strains being susceptible to tetracycline whereas Pediococcus strains and Lb. ghanensis strains were resistant. For gentamicin, Leuc. pseudomesenteroides, Lb. ghanensis and Ped. acidilactici strains were resistant to 64 mg/L whereas some W. confusa and Lb. plantarum strains had a MIC value of 16 mg/L and 32 mg/L respectively. No β-haemolytic activity was observed, however, α-haemolytic activity was observed in 27% (9) of the strains comprising Lb. salivarius (6), W. confusa (2) and Lb. delbrueckii (1) isolates.
Conclusions
The resistance to kanamycin and vancomycin is probably an intrinsic feature since similar observations were reported in the literature for LAB. Low prevalence of pathogenicity indicator traits were observed among the isolates especially with the presence of poor haemolytic activities and they could therefore be considered as interesting candidates for selection of starter cultures or probiotics for different applications.
Articles from BMC Microbiology are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central