Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Clin Genet. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 October 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3461579

Identities and frequencies of mutations of the otoferlin gene (OTOF) causing DFNB9 deafness in Pakistan


Mutations in OTOF, encoding otoferlin, cause non-syndromic recessive hearing loss. The goal of our study was to define the identities and frequencies of OTOF mutations in a model population. We screened a cohort of 557 large consanguineous Pakistani families segregating recessive, severe-to-profound, prelingual-onset deafness for linkage to DFNB9. There were 13 families segregating deafness consistent with linkage to markers for DFNB9. We analyzed the genomic nucleotide sequence of OTOF and detected probable pathogenic sequence variants among all 13 families. These include the previously reported nonsense mutation p.R708X and 10 novel variants: 3 nonsense mutations (p.R425X, p.W536X, and p.Y1603X), 1 frameshift (c.1103_1104delinsC), 1 single amino acid deletion (p.E766del) and 5 missense substitutions of conserved residues (p.L573R, p.A1090E, p.E1733K, p.R1856Q and p.R1939W). OTOF mutations thus account for deafness in 13 (2.3%) of 557 Pakistani families. This overall prevalence is similar, but the mutation spectrum is different from those for Western populations. In addition, we demonstrate the existence of an alternative splice isoform of OTOF expressed in the human cochlea. This isoform must be required for human hearing because it encodes a unique alternative C-terminus affected by some DFNB9 mutations.

Keywords: DFNB9, hearing, OTOF, otoferlin

Mutations in OTOF, encoding otoferlin, cause non-syndromic recessive hearing loss at theDFNB9 locus (1). OTOF-related hearing loss (OMIM 60381) is frequently associated with intact otoacoustic emissions as part of a distinctive phenotype referred to as auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony (AN/AD) (26). There are different hypotheses for the pathogenesis of the DFNB9 phenotype (710): some, but not all, authors believe that it reflects a role for otoferlin solely in exocytosis at the cochlear inner hair cell synapse.

There are ‘long’ and ‘short’ isoforms of OTOF that result from utilization of alternative transcription start sites either at exon 1 for the long isoform of OTOF or in two locations in the sequence of exon 20, respectively (11). The long isoform encodes a protein containing six predicted C2 domains and a C-terminal transmembrane domain (11). The long isoform is thought to be required for normal hearing because it is affected by all DFNB9 mutations, whereas only some mutations also affect the short isoform (11).

Alternative splicing also contributes to OTOF transcript diversity. There are two classes of transcripts in which either exon 47 or exon 48 encodes alternative C-termini and translation stop codons (11). The only reported human full-length long isoform is a brain-derived transcript that utilizes exon 47 (GenBank AF183185.1), whereas other human (brain, kidney and heart) transcripts utilizing exon 48 have been detected only in short isoforms (11). The existence of transcripts utilizing exon 48 in human cochlea was initially suggested by the presence of such a transcript in mouse cochlea (11) and further supported by the detection of probable DFNB9 mutations in the open reading frame encoded by exon 48 (2, 3), although such a transcript has not been reported in human cochlea.

Rodríguez-Ballesteros et al. demonstrated that the p.Q829X mutation of OTOF accounts for about 5.1% of recessive prelingual deafness in the Spanish population (3). More recently, biallelic OTOF mutations were identified in approximately 3.1% of Spanish and Caucasian families segregating recessive non-syndromic hearing loss (5, 6). However, these studies may have overestimated the prevalence ofDFNB9hearing loss due to an ascertainment bias for subjects with a clinical diagnosis of AN/AD.

Our previously reported Pakistani study population is a powerful resource for recessive hearing loss studies because their large, consanguineous family structures support statistically significant linkage scores (12). The families in our study are ascertained without otoacoustic emissions testing and are thus unselected with regard to AN/AD. We have already estimated the contributions of several other DFNB genes to recessive, severeto-profound, congenital or prelingual-onset deafness in this population (1318). Mutations of GJB2, SLC26A4, MYO15A, TMC1, TRIOBP, MYO6 and RDX each account for 0.3–6.1% of recessive deafness in this population. These results reflect the extensive genetic heterogeneity and large genetic load of deafness that is still unaccounted for in this and other populations. The goal of our current study was to characterize the identities and frequencies of OTOF mutations in 557 Pakistani families segregating recessive deafness.

Materials and methods

Pakistani families segregating recessive deafness

This study was approved by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at the National Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biology (CEMB, Lahore, Pakistan) and the National Institutes of Health (Combined Neuroscience IRB, Bethesda, MD, USA). A total of 557 Pakistani families segregating recessive, congenital or prelingual-onset, severe-to-profound sensorineural deafness were ascertained by the CEMB and evaluated for linkage to known DFNB loci as previously reported (15). Phenotype evaluations included medical and developmental history interviews, physical examinations and pure tone audiometry. DFNB9-linked short tandem repeat (STR) markers were D2S2144, D2S2223, and D2S174.

Mutation analysis

We performed bidirectional nucleotide sequence analysis of the 48 reported exons of OTOF (GenBank AF183185.1) and additional exonic sequence that encodes the 5′-untranslated region (UTR) of the short isoform (GenBank AF183187.1) in families segregating deafness linked to DFNB9. We polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified and sequenced OTOF exons as described (1, 11) with a few exceptions. A new primer was designed for PCR amplification of exon 38, and nested primers were used for sequencing exons 18, 20 and 21 and the 5′-UTR of the short isoform. The primer sequences were 38F, 5′-CTTCACTGTCATAGGACCCTCAG;38R, 5′-GATTGGCTAGGGTGGGAGGT; 18Fnested, 5′-CTGGTGGGGA-ATGCACTCTA; 18Rnested, 5′-CGGGAGGTGAGGTCTTGG; 20Fnested, 5′-ATCAACAGGGAGGAGGCATT; 20Rnested, 5′-TTTGTCCAGTTCCGCCTCAT; 21Fnested, 5′-TTTGTCCAGTTCCGCCTCAT; 21Rnested, 5′-TGTGACACCTTCTCACAACCA; 5′-UTR(F)nested, 5′-GTCCTAGGGTTTCCCTCTGTCT; and 5′-UTR (R)nested, 5′-GTGAATCAGGAGTGTGGGTGAT.

All participating affected and unaffected family members were included for sequence analyses of variant exons. Numbering of mutations in exons 1–46 was based upon the human brain long isoform (GenBank AF183185.1). Mutations in exon 48 were numbered according to exons 1–46 of the human brain long isoform followed by exon 48 of the human short isoform (GenBank AF183187.1). Names of all variants were checked using Mutalyzer ( Splice site variants, intronic variants and synonymous changes were considered non-pathogenic when they were detected in normal Pakistani population, or the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project ( and ESEFINDER ( bioinformatic tools did not predict a change that creates or eliminates an acceptor or donor splice site.

RT-PCR analysis of exon 47 of OTOF in human tissues

Human cochlea complementary DNA (cDNA) was derived from a human fetal cochlea cDNA library (19), and human brain cDNA was purchased from Clontech (human multiple tissue cDNA panel 1, Palo Alto, CA, USA). We PCR amplified OTOF cDNA with forward and reverse primers corresponding to exons 46 (5′-GAGGCAGAGAAGAACCCAGTG) and 48 (5′-AAGCCACTGAAAGGAAATGC), respectively, using HotStarTaq DNA polymerase (Qiagen Sciences, MD) with an initial 15-min activation step of 95°C, followed by 35-step cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 1 min. The cDNA amplification products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified, and the nucleotide sequence was confirmed by direct sequencing.


DFNB9 and OTOF mutation prevalence

We identified 13 (2.3%) of 557 families (Fig. 1a) cosegregating deafness with homozygosity for DFNB9-linked STR marker genotypes. We detected probable pathogenic sequence variants of OTOF in affected subjects from all 13 Pakistani DFNB9 families (Table 1). Homozygosity for these variants cosegregated with deafness in each of the families.

Fig. 1
(a) Pedigrees of Pakistani families segregating recessive sensorineural hearing loss (filled symbols) linked to DFNB9. (b) ClustalW alignment of otoferlin orthologs in six non-contiguous regions (separated by dots) containing leucine-573 (p.L573R), glutamic ...
Table 1
OTOF sequence variants in Pakistani families with DFNB9 hearing lossa

Pathogenic variants

We found the previously reported p.R708X mutation (3, 6) in two families. The other 10 probable pathogenic variants were novel: these comprised 1 frameshift (p.G368AfsX2), 3 nonsense mutations (p.R425X, p.W536X, and p.Y1603X), 1 single amino acid deletion (p.E766del) and 5 missense substitutions (p.L573R, p.A1090E, p.E1733K, p.R1856Q and p.R1939W). Nine of 10 novel variants were identified in only one family and were not present in 196 to 334 Pakistani control chromosomes (Table 1). One of 10 novel variants (p.E1733K) was found in two families and was detected in 1 of 304 control chromosomes (Table 1), but this low carrier frequency is consistent with a role as a pathogenic recessive allele. p.E1733K and p.R1856Q affect the C2F domain and are the only non-truncated mutations that affect a predicted functional (C2) or transmembrane domain of otoferlin in this study. The missense substitutions and the single amino acid deletion affect amino acids that are conserved in known OTOF orthologs (Fig. 1b). These data suggest that the missense variants and p.E766del are pathogenic. However, p.E766del does not affect a C2 domain, and the sequence from rat otoferlin shows the absence of this particular residue (Fig. 1b). It is possible that the human protein may still be functional without E766. However, we did not find another potentially pathogenic variant in the 48 exons or donor or acceptor splice sites. Moreover, deafness segregating in family PKDF527 was linked to markers for OTOF and achieved a LOD score of 3.92. Together, these data suggest that in humans, the p.E766del allele of OTOF may be pathogenic. Among the 11 pathogenic variants, 5 affect only the long isoform and 6 affect both long and short isoforms.

Alternative splicing of exon 47 in human cochlear OTOF transcripts

p.R1939W affects the same amino acid as the previously reported p.R1939Q mutation encoded by exon 48 (2). Exon 48 is predicted to encode the C-terminal 60 amino acids of an alternative OTOF isoform lacking exon 47. We investigated alternative splicing of exon 47 in human cochlear OTOF transcripts by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis (Fig. 1c). Human cochlear transcripts exclusively utilize exon 48 to encode the C-terminus as previously described for mouse cochlear OTOF transcripts (11). Thus, p.R1939W affects the protein-coding region of OTOF transcripts expressed in human cochlea.

Non-pathogenic variants

In addition to previously published non-pathogenic variants, we also detected six unreported nonpathogenic sequence variants among different families (Table 1). A novel splice site variant (c.766-3C>T) in cis configuration with p.E766del was found inPKDF527. c.766-3C>T was predicted to have a slight effect upon a canonical splice acceptor site by the ESEFINDER program, but this variant was present in 7 of 182 normal Pakistani control chromosomes, indicating it is likely to be a benign variant. Conversely, c.2316-29C>T was detected only once in normal Pakistani control chromosomes, but this variant did not show an effect upon the splice acceptor activity in silico.


Including the 10 novel mutations in this study, 50 pathogenic variants of OTOF have now been reported. Although p.Q829X is a recurrent mutation in Spanish study populations (3, 6, 20), the other known mutant alleles of OTOF are either private or very rare. Because these mutations are widely dispersed among many different exons, it may be difficult to implement efficient hierarchical screening strategies in other populations.

Our identification of probable pathogenic OTOF variants in 13 of 13 Pakistani families segregating DFNB9-linked deafness strongly suggests that this is a genetically homogenous locus. This is in contrast with previous studies that detected mutations of OTOF only in 17–30% of smaller families with possible linkage to DFNB9 (5, 20). Based upon our cohort of 557 study families, we estimate that OTOF mutations account for 2.3% (13/557) (95%CI: 1.4–4.0%) of the genetic load of recessive, congenital or prelingual-onset, severe-to-profound deafness in this population. This estimate falls within the mid-range among estimates (0.3–6.1%) for other DFNB genes that we have studied in this population: GJB2, SLC26A4, TMC1, MYO15A, TRIOBP and RDX (Table 2).

Table 2
Percentage of Pakistani families segregating mutant alleles of DFNB genes

Our estimated DFNB9 prevalence of 2.3% is not significantly different from those of other studies in other populations. Although Varga et al. identified OTOF mutations in 6 (9.2%) of 65 families, only 2 families (3.1%) showed biallelic OTOF mutations (5). Moreover, their study preferentially recruited families with a clinical phenotype of AN/AD. Rodriguez-Ballesteros identified biallelic OTOF mutations in 23 (3.2%) of 708 Spanish subjects and 2 (2.4%) of 83 Colombian subjects with non-syndromic hearing loss (6). Their studies also might have preferentially recruited subjects with a clinical phenotype of AN/AD without evidence of linkage. In contrast, we ascertained subjects based upon hearing loss severity and onset without regard to otoacoustic emissions status or a possible diagnosis of AN/AD. We may have therefore underestimated the prevalence of DFNB9 because our ascertainment missed milder or delayed-onset cases of hearing loss. High rates of consanguinity might also have influenced our estimate in either direction. Nevertheless, these similar estimates derived from different ascertainment strategies for different populations indicate that OTOF mutations are an important contributor to the genetic load of deafness in diverse populations.


Human cochlear cDNA was a gift from the laboratory of Cynthia C. Morton. This study was supported by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders intramural research funds Z01-DC00039-10 and Z01-DC00060-07 and also by the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Islamabad, Pakistan; Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST), Islamabad, Pakistan. We thank Rob Morell, Julie M. Schultz, Dennis Drayna, Doris Wu, and Karen Friderici for comments and critical review of the manuscript.


1. Yasunaga S, Grati M, Cohen-Salmon M, et al. A mutation in OTOF, encoding otoferlin, a FER-1-like protein, causes DFNB9, a nonsyndromic form of deafness. Nat Genet. 1999;21 (4):363–369. [PubMed]
2. Varga R, Kelley PM, Keats BJ, et al. Non-syndromic recessive auditory neuropathy is the result of mutations in the otoferlin (OTOF) gene. J Med Genet. 2003;40 (1):45–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Rodríguez-Ballesteros M, del Castillo FJ, Martin Y, et al. Auditory neuropathy in patients carrying mutations in the otoferlin gene (OTOF) Hum Mutat. 2003;22 (6):451–456. [PubMed]
4. Tekin M, Akcayoz D, Incesulu A. A novel missense mutation in a C2 domain of OTOF results in autosomal recessive auditory neuropathy. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;138 (1):6–10. [PubMed]
5. Varga R, Avenarius MR, Kelley PM, et al. OTOF mutations revealed by genetic analysis of hearing loss families including a potential temperature sensitive auditory neuropathy allele. J Med Genet. 2006;43 (7):576–581. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Rodríguez-Ballesteros M, Reynoso R, Olarte M, et al. A multicenter study on the prevalence and spectrum of mutations in the otoferlin gene (OTOF) in subjects with nonsyndromic hearing impairment and auditory neuropathy. Hum Mutat. 2008;29 (6):823–831. [PubMed]
7. Brandt N, Kuhn S, Munkner S, et al. Thyroid hormone deficiency affects postnatal spiking activity and expression of Ca2+ and K+ channels in rodent inner hair cells. J Neurosci. 2007;27 (12):3174–3186. [PubMed]
8. Schug N, Braig C, Zimmermann U, et al. Differential expression of otoferlin in brain, vestibular system, immature and mature cochlea of the rat. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24 (12):3372–3380. [PubMed]
9. Roux I, Safieddine S, Nouvian R, et al. Otoferlin, defective in a human deafness form, is essential for exocytosis at the auditory ribbon synapse. Cell. 2006;127 (2):277–289. [PubMed]
10. Beurg M, Safieddine S, Roux I, et al. Calcium- and otoferlin-dependent exocytosis by immature outer hair cells. J Neurosci. 2008;28 (8):1798–1803. [PubMed]
11. Yasunaga S, Grati M, Chardenoux S, et al. OTOF encodes multiple long and short isoforms: genetic evidence that the long ones underlie recessive deafness DFNB9. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;67 (3):591–600. [PubMed]
12. Friedman TB, Griffith AJ. Human nonsyndromic sensorineural deafness. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2003;4:341–402. [PubMed]
13. Park HJ, Shaukat S, Liu XZ, et al. Origins and frequencies of SLC26A4 (PDS) mutations in east and south Asians: global implications for the epidemiology of deafness. JMed Genet. 2003;40 (4):242–248. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Nal N, Ahmed ZM, Erkal E, et al. Mutational spectrum of MYO15A: the large N-terminal extension of myosin XVA is required for hearing. Hum Mutat. 2007;28 (10):1014–1019. [PubMed]
15. Kitajiri SI, McNamara R, Makishima T, et al. Identities, frequencies and origins of TMC1 mutations causing DFNB7/B11 deafness in Pakistan. Clin Genet. 2007;72 (6):546–550. [PubMed]
16. Riazuddin S, Khan SN, Ahmed ZM, et al. Mutations in TRIOBP, which encodes a putative cytoskeletal-organizing protein, are associated with nonsyndromic recessive deafness. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78 (1):137–143. [PubMed]
17. Ahmed ZM, Morell RJ, Riazuddin S, et al. Mutations of MYO6 are associated with recessive deafness, DFNB37. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72 (5):1315–1322. [PubMed]
18. Khan SY, Ahmed ZM, Shabbir MI, et al. Mutations of the RDX gene cause nonsyndromic hearing loss at the DFNB24 locus. Hum Mutat. 2007;28 (5):417–423. [PubMed]
19. Robertson NG, Khetarpal U, Gutierrez-Espeleta GA, et al. Isolation of novel and known genes from a human fetal cochlear cDNA library using subtractive hybridization and differential screening. Genomics. 1994;23 (1):42–50. [PubMed]
20. Migliosi V, Modamio-Hoybjor S, Moreno-Pelayo MA, et al. Q829X, a novel mutation in the gene encoding otoferlin (OTOF), is frequently found in Spanish patients with prelingual non-syndromic hearing loss. J Med Genet. 2002;39 (7):502–506. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Mirghomizadeh F, Pfister M, Apaydin F, et al. Substitutions in the conserved C2C domain of otoferlin cause DFNB9, a form of nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness. Neurobiol Dis. 2002;10 (2):157–164. [PubMed]
22. Houseman MJ, Jackson AP, Al-Gazali LI, et al. A novel mutation in a family with non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss that disrupts the newly characterised OTOF long isoforms. J Med Genet. 2001;38 (8):E25. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Santos RL, Wajid M, Pham TL, et al. Low prevalence of Connexin 26 (GJB2) variants in Pakistani families with autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing impairment. Clin Genet. 2005;67 (1):61–68. [PMC free article] [PubMed]