As underlined above, the exact contribution of different brain cells to the in vivo effects of adenosine A3 receptor agonists is not yet established. In brain, adenosine receptors are not only expressed by neuronal cells, but are also abundantly present on endothelial and glial cells, which may therefore significantly contribute to the detected effects.
In recent years, our laboratory has been particularly interested at characterizing the functional roles of adenosine receptors on astrocytes, a cell type which is now recognized to play important roles in both central nervous system development and in brain repair following trauma and ischemia (for review, see Refs.
21, 22). Not only do astroglial cells provide a metabolic support to neurons, but they also exert a number of highly specific functions. In developing brain, during specification of cortical areas, radial glia offer substratum and guide to migrating neurons and at the end of neurogenesis transforms into type 1 astrocytes. In adult brain, astrocytes express neurotransmitter receptors and uptake systems and directly participate in neurotransmission. Moreover, astroglial cells arc known to respond to various types of injury by rapid and vigorous astrogliosis, a reaction characterized by both increased astroglial cell proliferation and astrocytic hypertrophy, as shown by “stellation” and increased expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), the astrocyte-specific intermediate filament protein. Although there is still debate about whether reactive astrogliosis is beneficial or detrimental to neuronal repair mechanisms, it is known that activated astrocytes are needed for axonal growth and guidance.
23On these bases and in keeping with the well documented protective actions of adenosine analogues, we undertook a study aimed at investigating the effects of the adenosine A
1/A
3 nonselective agonist 2-chloroadenosine (2-CA) on rat brain primary astrocytes. Choice of this agonist was simply due to the fact that it is relatively hydrolysis-resistant, and therefore seemed to us particularly suited for long-term “trophic” studies. Surprisingly, exposure of cultures to 2-CA resulted, 48–72 hr later, in a marked reduction of astrocytic cell number, as shown by a dramatic decrease of GFAP-positive cells.
24 2-CA-induced decrease of astrocytic cell number was not counteracted by either xanthine derivatives or blockers of the adenosine transport system, which suggested the involvement of a xanthine-insensitive extracellular receptor. In an attempt to elucidate the molecular mechanisms responsible for 2-CA-induced reduction of astrocytes, we preincubated cultures with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and then double-labeled cells with both an anti-GFAP antibody (to detect astrocytes) and an anti-BrdU antibody (to quantify the percentage of astrocytes undergoing DNA synthesis). We were surprised to find out that, despite the marked reduction of cell number, 2-CA significantly increased the percentage of cells showing anti-BrdU immunoreactivity in nuclei.
24 Other examples had been previously reported in the literature where cell death was shown to be accompanied by a concomitant “paradoxical” increase of DNA synthesis. This phenomenon has been well characterized for secretory epithelial prostate cells that undergo extensive apoptosis following castration. Colombel & co-workers demonstrated that prostatic cells undergoing apoptotic death incorporate BrdU into nuclear DNA prior to DNA fragmentation.
25 Based on these data, they concluded that quiescent epithelial cells undergo apoptosis as a result of two sequential events initiated by testosterone depletion. The first event is an active reentry of these cells into the cell cycle. The second event is the apoptotic destruction resulting from the inability of differentiated cells to successfully complete this cycle (“abortive mitosis”).
25 Moreover, a number of data has been accumulating in recent years suggesting that two strikingly different cellular programs as cell proliferation and cell death by apoptosis indeed share initial identical patterns of protooncogene expression,
26–29 so that the same primary stimulus activates a common pathway that can lead to either event; the timing of a secondary growth stimulus determines the final outcome.
30On this background, we decided to verify whether astroglial cell death induced by 2-CA was apoptosis. Flow cytometric analysis of propidium iodide-stained nuclei showed the appearance of an hypodiploid DNA peak in cultures exposed to 2-CA that was not present in control cultures, suggesting induction of apoptosis, which was also confirmed by light and transmission electron microscopy analysis of cells.
11 An example of 2-CA-induced apoptosis is shown in . This study represented the first demonstration in favor of a novel action for adenosine (induction of cell death by apoptosis) in the central nervous system.
More recently, we extended this study to the investigation of the receptor subtype responsible for adenosine-induced apoptosis. A possible role for the A
3 receptor was indirectly suggested by the demonstration that 2-CA effects were not reversed by xanthine antagonists.
24 We therefore tested the effects of the selective A
3 receptor agonist IB-MECA and its more recent 2-chloro derivative, 2-C1-IB-MECA.
32 Exposure of rat astrocytes to high (
μM) concentrations of either agonist resulted in development of apoptosis, as shown by both morphological and flow cytometric criteria.
33 On both rat astrocytes and human astrocytoma cells (ADF cells),
34 at concentrations 2–3 orders of magnitude lower (10–100 nM), these same agonists induced a marked reorganization of the cytoskeleton, with appearance of stress fibers and numerous cell protrusions. These morphological changes were accompanied by a significant reduction of the number of spontaneously detached apoptotic cells in the culture medium.
33The opposing actions induced on astroglial cells by nM and
μM A
3 agonist concentrations may be, at least in part, the bases of the strikingly different ischemic outcome observed
in vivo after either acute or chronic administation of IB-MECA.
19 We speculate that a robust and acute activation of these receptors during ischemia as a consequence of massive release of adenosine (see the previous section) may contribute to the development of ischemic damage. It could be hypothesized that A
3 receptor-mediated apoptosis of astroglial cells may result in a reduced survival rate of neuronal cells (of course, this does not rule out that possible direct effects of adenosine A
3 receptors located on other cell types may contribute to ischemia-induced damage as well). In the von Lubitz
et al. study, a marked cerebroprotection associated to increased survival rate was demonstrated if ischemia was induced after a subchronic treatment with low doses of IB-MECA.
19 Desensitization of central A
3 receptors as a consequence of prolonged agonist exposure was hypothesized to reduce the putative deleterious contribution of this receptor to ischemic damage. Our data on cells of the astroglial lineage show that, under certain experimental conditions, A
3 agonists can indeed activate cell protection mechanisms (e.g., changes of the cytoskeletal machinery making cells more resistant to subsequent insults). However, since these beneficial effects are induced at nM agonist concentrations, molecular mechanisms other than agonist-induced receptor desensitization may be involved. A subthreshold stimulation of the A
3 receptor prior to the induction of ischemia may result in activation of protective mechanisms that make the brain less sensitive to a subsequent ischemic insult (“ischemic tolerance”). In this respect, it was previously shown that, in gerbils, mild ischemic treatments (e.g., a 2-min carotid occlusion) induce tolerance to a subsequent, and what would be lethal, ischemic stress.
35 Alternatively, the differential effects induced by different A
3 agonist concentrations may be related to either expression of two distinct astroglial A
3 receptor subtypes (endowed with different affinities and mediating cell protection and cell death, respectively) or to coupling of the same receptor to different transduction pathways, simply depending upon the degree of receptor activation. Studies are currently in progress in our laboratory aimed at elucidating this important point.