PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jurbhealthspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen ChoiceThis journal
 
J Urban Health. 2005 September; 82(3): 420–433.
PMCID: PMC3456061

Community case management for former jail inmates: Its impacts on rearrest, drug use, and HIV risk

Abstract

Dramatically increasing incarceration rates in the United States have led to large concentrations of formerly imprisoned people in poverty-stricken urban areas. Therefore, identifying ways to belp inmates who exhibit multiple, serious problems and who are at great risk of experiencing poor postrelease outcomes is especially important to urban communities, as well as to service providers and policymakers concerned about these communities. Our research provides evidence about the effectiveneess of one strategy, called Health Link, which recruited adult women and adolescent men while they were incarcerated in a New York City jail and offered case management services during the especially challenging first year after release. About 1,400 participants who enrolled during a 3-year period were ramdomly assigned either to a group that was eligible for intensive discharge planning services and community-based case management services or to a group eligible for less-intensive discharge planning and no community-based services. We investigated whether the availability of these services reduced rates of drug use, HIV risk, and rearrest. Using data from interviews and bair analysis to measure impacts during a 1-year follow-up period after clients’ release from jail, we detected increased participation in drug treatment programs and weak evidence for reduced drug use. However, we did not observe reductions in rearrest rates orin activities with high risk of HIV infection. We conclude that a well-executed case management program can make modest differences in a few short-term outcomes of former inmates. However, the intervention did not lead to the hoped-for changes across a range of outcomes that would clearly indicate greater success in community reintegration or improved health.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (108K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
1. Clear TR, Rose DR, Ryder JA. Incarceration and the community: the problem of removing and returning offenders. Crime Delinq. 2001;47:335–351.
2. Maguire K, Pastore AL, editors. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2001.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Women, injection drug use, and the criminal justice system. August 2001. Available at: http://www.thebody.com/cdc/ women_idu.html. Accessed February 20, 2004.
4. Freudenberg N. Adverse effects of US jail and prison policies on the health and wellbeing of women of color. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1895–1899. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.92.12.1895. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Richie BE, Freudenberg N, Page J. Reintegrating women leaving jail into urban communities: a description of a model program. J Urban Health. 2001;78:290–303. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Health Link: A Description of a Model Program to Reduce Substance Abuse and Recidivism. New York, NY: Hunter College Center on AIDS, Drugs, and Community Health; 1997.
7. Rhodes W, Smith C. Bias in Self-Reporting by Birth Cohorts Over Time as Reflected in the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, Inc; 1993.
8. Freudenberg N. Jails, prisons and the health of urban populations: a review of the impact of the correctional system on community health. J Urban Health. 2001;78:214–235. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Rawson R, Huber A, McCann M, et al. A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches during methadone maintenance treatment for cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:817–824. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.817. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Silva de Lima M, Garcia de Oliveira Soares B, Alves Pereira Reisser AA, Farrell M. Pharmacological treatment of cocaine dependence: a systematic review. Addiction. 2002;97:931–949. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00209.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. The Henry J. Substance Use and Risky Sexual (#3214) Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2002.
12. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Workshop Summary: Scientific Evidence on Condom Effectiveness for Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Prevention, June 12–13, 2000, Herndon, Virginia. 2001.
13. Amaro H. An expensive policy: the impact of inadequate funding for substance abuse treatment. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:657–659. [PubMed]
14. Martin SS, Inciardi JA. Case management outcomes for drug-involved offenders. Prison J. 1997;77:168–183. doi: 10.1177/0032855597077002004. [Cross Ref]
15. Rhodes W, Gross M. Case Management Reduces Drug Use and Criminality Among Drug-Involved Arrestees: An Experimental Study of an HIV Prevention Intervention. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 1997.
16. Longshore D, Turner S, Anglin MD. Effects of case management on drug users’ risky sex. Prison J. 1998;78:6–30.
17. Deschenes EP, Greenwood PW, Marshall GN. The Nokomis Challenge Program Evaluation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 1996.
18. Josi D, Sechrest D. A pragmatic approach to parole aftercare: evaluation of a community reintegration program for high-risk youthful offenders. Justice Q. 1999;16:51–80. doi: 10.1080/07418829900094051. [Cross Ref]
19. Rossman S, Sridharan S, Gouvis C, Buck J, Morley E. Impact of the Opportunity to Succeed (OPTS) Aftercare Program for Substance-Abusing Felons: Comprehensive Final Report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 1999.

Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine