Purpose: The objectives were to identify the stage/s of IVF treatment where a woman is most vulnerable to psychological stress, and to assess the Mean Affect Adjective Check List (MAACL) as a measure of psychological functioning during IVF treatment, which has hitherto not been reported.
Methods: Thirty-seven women undergoing IVF treatment according to the long protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation completed the MAACL questionnaire at the following stages: (a) before treatment (visit 1), (b) before embryo transfer (visit 2), and (c) before pregnancy test (visit 3).
Results: Apart from anxiety scores for visit 2, the hostility, depression, and state anxiety scores for visit 3 were higher than the corresponding scores for visits 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). Anxiety scores for visits 2 and 3 were similar.
Conclusions: Psychological counseling should be targeted at women after embryo transfer and leading up to the pregnancy test. The MAACL is a useful method for measuring psychological stress in women during IVF treatment.
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
1. Baram D, Tourtelot E, Muechler E, Huang K. Psychosocial adjustment following unsuccessful in vitro fertilization. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;9:181–190.
2. Leiblum SR, Kemmann E, Lane MK. The psychological concomitants of in vitro fertilization. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;6:165–178.
3. Zuckerman M, Lubin B. Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List Measure of Anxiety. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service; 1965.
4. Lubin B, Zuckerman M: Bibliography for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List. Unpublished, 1982.
5. Badner NH, Nielson WR, Munk S, Kwiatkowska C, Gelb AW. Preoperative anxiety: Detection and contributing factors. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37:444–447. [PubMed] 6. Kreitler S, Chaitchik S, Rapoport Y, Algor R. Psychosocial effects of level of information and severity of disease on head and neck cancer patients. J Cancer Educ. 1995;10:144–154. [PubMed] 7. Connolly KJ, Edelmann RJ, Bartlett H, Cooke ID, Lenton E, Pike S. An evaluation of counselling for couples undergoing treatment for in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1332–1338. [PubMed] 8. Boivin J, Takefman JE. Stress level across stages of in vitro fertilization in subsequently pregnant and non-pregnant women. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:802–810. [PubMed] 9. Merari D, Feldberg D, Elizur A, Goldman J, Modan B. Psychological and hormonal changes in the course of in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1992;9:161–169. [PubMed]
10. Johnston M, Shaw R, Bird D. ''Test tube baby'' procedures: Stress and judgements under uncertainty. Psychol Health. 1987;1:25–38.
11. Demyttenaere K, Nijs P, Evers-Kiebooms G, Koninckx PR. Coping and the ineffectiveness of coping influence the outcome of in vitro fertilization through stress responses. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1992;17:655–665. [PubMed] 12. Daniluk JC. Infertility: Intrapersonal and interpersonal impact. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:982–290. [PubMed]
13. Mazure CM, Greenfeld DA. Psychological studies of in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer participants. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1989;6:242.