PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

Logo of capmcAbout manuscripts / A propos des manuscritsSubmit manuscript / soumettre un manuscrit
 
From:
Neuropsychologia. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 21.
Published in final edited form as:
Neuropsychologia. 2009 November; 47(13): 2749–2755.
Published online 2009 June 6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.022

Fig. 2

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms2321f2.jpg

Grand-averaged ERP responses to targets for the P1 and N1 time windows. Data are shown as a function of visual field (left vs. right) and cueing (cued vs. uncued) for fallers (top) and non-fallers (bottom). Time window is out to 300 ms post-cue, with a 200 ms pre-cue baseline. Amplitude measured in uV. For the P1 component, fallers showed a larger amplitude for uncued trials relative to cued trials in the left visual field for contralateral sites (highlighted in yellow). In contrast, non-fallers showed a larger P1 amplitude for cued trials relative to uncued trials. There were no significant differences between fallers and non-fallers for the N1 component.

Images in this article

  • Fig. 1
  • Fig. 2
  • Fig. 3
Click on the image to see a larger version.