|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Surviving in a world with hidden rewards and dangers requires choosing the appropriate behaviours. Recent discoveries indicate that the habenula plays a prominent part in such behavioural choice through its effects on neuromodulator systems, in particular the dopamine and serotonin systems. By inhibiting dopamine-releasing neurons, habenula activation leads to the suppression of motor behaviour when an animal fails to obtain a reward or anticipates an aversive outcome. Moreover, the habenula is involved in behavioural responses to pain, stress, anxiety, sleep and reward, and its dysfunction is associated with depression, schizophrenia and drug-induced psychosis. As a highly conserved structure in the brain, the habenula provides a fundamental mechanism for both survival and decision-making.
The habenula is a phylogenetically old brain structure that is present in virtually all vertebrate species. In many of the vertebrates — fishes, amphibian, and reptiles — the habenula is larger on one side than the other, unlike most other brain structures1. The asymmetry of the habenula is often associated with asymmetries in neuronal organization2 and behaviour — for example, in social recognition, anti-predator response and locomotion3. In birds and mammals the habenula is a small area located at the posterior-dorsal-medial end of the thalamus and is divided into the medial habenula (MHb) and the lateral habenula (LHb).
It is thought that the habenula has evolved in close association with the pineal gland4, with which it has reciprocal connections5. The habenula also receives inputs from the limbic system and the basal ganglia, mainly through the stria medullaris6 (FIG. 1). The pineal gland, habenula and stria medullaris together form the epithalamus, a prominent structure that overlies the thalamus. The fasciculus retroflexus (also known as the habenula-interpeduncular tract) forms the output of the habenula. LHb neurons project to midbrain areas that are involved in the release of dopamine (the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA)) and serotonin (the median raphe nucleus (MRN) and dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN))7. It has recently been shown that LHb efferents are predominantly mediated by the rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg)8. MHb neurons project to the interpeduncular nucleus (IPN), which projects to the MRN and DRN in addition to other areas9. It is plausible, therefore, that both the LHb and the MHb control the release of serotonin.
The neural network that is outlined above indicates that the habenula may act as a node to link the forebrain to the midbrain regions that are involved in regulating emotional behaviours10. Indeed, experimental manipulations of this system — and in particular, lesions of the habenula — are followed by behavioural alterations in relation to pain, stress, anxiety, sleep, reward, and to cognitive and motor dysfunctions11. Although many studies have been performed since the 1950s, the precise function of the habenula has remained obscure.
Recently, however, the habenula has attracted a great deal of attention. One main reason for this is probably the part that it plays in the regulation of dopamine and serotonin systems. Experimental and clinical studies have shown that these neuromodulators are essential for normal motor and mental activities — as exemplified by the disorders that are associated with reduced levels of dopamine (for example, Parkinson’s disease) and serotonin (for example, major depression) — and the habenula is one of few regions that influence both the dopamine and serotonin systems. Another reason for the increased interest in the habenula may be the recent advances in human brain imaging studies. Until recently the resolution of the habenula in MRI and positron emission tomography (PET) studies was too low, but the habenula can now be visualized in imaging studies. The habenula has been shown to be hyperactive in patients with major depression12 and in healthy people when receiving negative feedback regarding a failed performance in a task13.
In this Review, I first discuss the various processes in which the habenula seems to be involved. Second, I show that the role of the habenula in these processes is characterized by a common theme, namely motor suppression (FIG. 2). Finally, I propose a common neural mechanism that may underlie the various functions of the habenula. I will not discuss in detail the comparative anatomy of the habenula, its development, its afferent and efferent connections and the neurotransmitters that are used by its neurons (and neurons associated with it), because excellent review articles have been published on these issues1,10,11,14.
Sleep is a fundamental phenomenon in which body and brain activities are suppressed. Several findings directly and indirectly suggest that the habenula has a role in the control of sleep, and this is probably related to its evolutional relationship with the pineal gland4 (see below).
First, the habenula seems to be crucial for rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Removing the habenula output by lesioning the fasciculus retroflexus in rats reduces both the amount of time that rats spend in REM sleep and the atonia associated with REM sleep15,16. When fetal brain tissue that includes the habenula is transplanted into these rats the normal sleep pattern and atonia are restored15,17. Second, the firing of habenula neurons shows circadian rhythmicity18, even in slice preparations19. Third, neural activity of the LHb or the MHb increases markedly during drug-induced general anesthaesia20–22 and emerging evidence suggests that similar neural mechanisms underlie sleep and anesthaesia23, indicating that habenula activity may also increase during sleep. Fourth, in hibernating squirrels LHb neurons show increased activity24 and MHb neurons show elevated levels of the rate-limiting enzyme for the synthesis of melatonin25. This suggests that the habenula (like the pineal gland) synthesizes melatonin and may have a role in the generation and maintenance of hibernation. Finally, MHb neurons produce the cytokine interleukin (IL)-18 (REF. 26), which is known to promote sleep when it is injected intracerebroventricularly27.
The proposed role of the habenula in the regulation of sleep may be achieved through the influence of the habenula on serotonin neurons28, whereas its control of sleep-associated atonia may be mediated by descending circuits in the brainstem, possibly via the RMTg, without the involvement of serotonin or dopamine neurons29,30 (FIG. 2a).
The co-evolution of the habenula and the pineal gland4 may explain how the habenula acquired a sleep-regulatory function. The pineal gland regulates circadian and seasonal rhythmicity by releasing melatonin (this occurs at night in humans)31 and has mutual connections with the habenula32. In many non-mammalian vertebrates the pineal gland contains photosensitive cells, but in mammals photodetection takes place in the retina. Melanopsinmediated retinal ganglion cells send input to the LHb (and to the suprachiasmatic nucleus)33, which is therefore sensitive to photic stimulation19. It is possible that the habenula may use this photic information to regulate sleep.
Normal sleep and sleep-like states are considered to be beneficial for survival under stress because they minimize energy expenditure34,35. If the habenula regulates normal sleep, non-physiological sleep and sleep-like behaviour, as proposed above, it may have an instrumental role in minimizing energy expenditure by suppressing body movements during sleep-like states. However, this hypothesis remains to be examined in future studies.
Several studies suggest that the habenula also suppresses motor behaviours in awake animals. Animals with habenula lesions become hyperactive, distractible and make motor responses prematurely in a reaction-time task36,37. These effects may be mediated by the indirect connection of the LHb to dopamine neurons in the SNc or the VTA (FIG. 2b). Indeed, without dopamine neurons, humans and most animals are unable to initiate voluntary movements, as seen in patients with, and in animal models of, Parkinson’s disease38.
Several lines of evidence indicate that LHb neurons inhibit dopamine neurons: electrical stimulation of the LHb inhibits activity of dopamine neurons in the SNc and VTA39–41, and habenula lesions increase dopamine release in the cerebral cortex and the striatum42. This suggests that the motor hyperactivity that is induced by habenula lesions in rats may be due to the removal of the inhibition of dopamine neurons.
In apparent contradiction to the association between dopamine neuron activity and movement, dopamine neurons usually do not change their activity before or during a body movement. Instead, they respond to sensory events that predict changes in the animal’s motivational state (which in turn induce the animal to act and therefore to move)43. Typically, dopamine neurons are excited by larger-than-expected rewards (and their predictors) and are inhibited by smaller-than-expected rewards (and their predictors)43. It has been proposed that these changes in dopamine neuron activity drive reinforcement learning44. In this scheme, the excitation of dopamine neurons in response to receiving a larger-than-expected reward facilitates the action that leads to the larger reward, whereas the inhibition of dopamine neurons in response to receiving a smaller-than-expected reward suppresses the action that leads to the smaller reward (FIG. 3).
Recent studies have revealed that dopamine neurons may receive these reward-related signals from the LHb. A functional MRI (fMRI) study in which human subjects performed a motion-prediction task13 showed that the habenula (in addition to the anterior cingulate cortex and insula) was activated when a subject received feedback indicating that his or her response in the task was wrong. This finding was corroborated at the single-cell level by an experiment using macaque monkeys that had been trained to perform a visual saccade task with positionally-biased reward outcomes41 (FIG. 4). LHb neurons were excited by the appearance of a stimulus indicating that the monkey would receive a small reward and were inhibited by a stimulus indicating that a large reward would be received. LHb neurons also responded when the monkey received the actual reward (they were excited by a small reward and inhibited by a large reward), but only if the reward was not expected41. This response pattern is the opposite of that observed in dopamine neurons41,43.
The results described above suggest that the LHb contributes to reinforcement learning through inhibitory action on dopamine neurons. However, subsequent studies have shown that the neural circuits that support LHb-mediated reinforcement learning are more complex (FIG. 3). First, negative reward prediction error signals are supplied to the LHb, at least partly, by neurons in the border region of the globus pallidus (GPb), more specifically, by neurons located between the internal and external segments of the globus pallidus45. These GPb neurons in turn receive input from the striatum, presumably from the subterritory known as the ‘striosome’46. Second, the inhibitory effect of LHb neurons on dopamine neurons seems to be mediated by GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid)-ergic inhibitory neurons40 in the RMTg8,47,48. Taken together, the data described above indicate that the GPb–LHb–RMTg–dopamine pathway has an important role in reward-based decision-making.
Failing to obtain a reward is disappointing and disheartening, but to be punished may be worse. LHb neurons have been shown to be excited49,50 or sometimes inhibited49 by painful — or otherwise aversive — stimuli. Furthermore, electrical stimulation of, or morphine injections into, the habenula induces analgesia51,52. These results suggest that the habenula may have a role in the response to aversive stimuli, including pain.
One method to investigate whether the habenula neurons indeed process motivational information rather than sensory information is to measure the response of habenula neurons to sensory stimuli that initially have no motivational value for the animal but that are subsequently conditioned using rewarding or aversive stimuli. In Pavlovian conditioning, such sensory stimuli are called conditioned stimuli (CSs) and the rewarding or aversive stimuli are called unconditioned stimuli (USs). If habenula neurons process negative motivational information, they should respond differently to the CS depending on the stimulus’ conditioned (or learned) values.
This idea was tested in an experiment using macaque monkeys53 (FIG. 5). A Pavlovian task was divided into two blocks: an ‘appetitive’ block in which juice was used as the US (FIG. 5a) and an ‘aversive’ block in which an air puff was used as the US (FIG. 5b). Three CSs (symbols, which appeared on a computer screen) indicated the probability (100%, 50% or 0%) of receiving the upcoming US. LHb neurons were strongly excited in the appetitive block by the CS that indicated a 0% probability of receiving the juice and in the aversive block by the CS that indicated a 100% probability of receiving the air puff (FIG. 5). In other words, LHb neurons were excited by the ‘worst outcome’ CS in each block. Conversely, the LHb neurons were inhibited by the CS indicating a 100% probability of receiving juice and (although only sometimes) by the CS indicating a 0% probability of receiving an air puff — that is, by the ‘best outcome’ CS in each block. Overall, the LHb neuron response was negatively correlated with the value of the outcome (US) as predicted by the CS, although the response was adjusted relative to the mean outcome value in each block.
These results indicate that the LHb responds to the negative value of a stimulus. By signalling this value — via the RMTg54 — to dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra and VTA, the habenula may contribute to the suppression of body movements that lead to an aversive outcome (FIG. 2b). Indeed, rats with habenula lesions show impairments in avoidance learning55–57 and furthermore, RMTg neurons are excited by various kinds of aversive stimuli54.
Prolonged exposure to an environment in which aversive stimuli can occur at any time is stressful and can cause anxiety as well as depression58. Stress-inducing stimuli — including the repetition of aversive stimuli, physical constraint, open field exposure and social defeat — activate LHb neurons59 (FIG. 2c).
The stress-induced activation of the LHb (typically indicated by an increase in Fos-like immunoreactivity) is relatively confined to its medial part60, which receives input from the limbic system (the septum, diagonal band of Broca and medial frontal cortex)6 and from dopamine neurons in the VTA61. It is not known whether MHb neurons respond to stress by changing their activity. However, several studies suggest that in the MHb, stress induces various immune responses, such as increases in the level of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-18 (in response to restraint stress)62 and in the number of mast cells (in response to fighting-induced stress)63.
A typical behavioural response to stress is a general suppression of motor activity64. Repeated exposure to aversive stimuli is particularly stressful and in monkeys such aversive stimuli excite LHb neurons53 but inhibit a group of midbrain dopamine neurons65. The dopamine neurons that are inhibited by aversive stimuli tend to be inhibited strongly by LHb stimulation and are mainly located in the medial part of the SNc–VTA65. Congenitally stress-vulnerable rats that were rendered ‘helpless’ through repeated exposure to aversive stimuli have higher metabolic activity in the LHb and lower activity in the VTA66 compared with non-vulnerable, non-helpless rats. Thus, the stress-induced activation of LHb neurons in these rats would lead to a strong inhibition of dopamine neurons, which subsequently leads to the suppression of motor activity (FIG. 2c).
It is important to note that in monkeys that are performing behavioural tasks, the aversive stimulus-induced changes in LHb and dopamine neuron activity are transient and the background activity of LHb neurons and dopamine neurons is similar in appetitive and aversive blocks of trials53,65 (FIG. 5). Indeed, these monkeys do not show any signs of major depression. However, if the aversive stimuli are delivered repeatedly and for a long time, sensitization may occur in LHb neurons so that their background activity is continuously elevated and, consequently, the background activity of dopamine neurons is continuously reduced. This condition may account for the motor suppression that is associated with ‘learned helplessness’. Stress-induced activation of the LHb may also cause behavioural changes through alterations in the activity of serotonin neurons (FIG. 2c). For example, sustained uncontrollable stress can cause a lack of motivation to perform goal-directed actions (learned helplessness)64 and changes in serotonin transmission are thought to contribute to this behavioural change because stress activates serotonin neurons in the DRN and MRN67 and increases serotonin release in different brain regions68. The LHb has robust projections to the DRN and MRN7,69, which are the main source of serotonin neurons. Electrical stimulation of the LHb has been found to inhibit neurons in the DRN and MRN70 but both inhibitory71 and facilitatory effects on serotonin release have been reported72. Nevertheless, it is possible that stress-induced activation of the LHb stimulates serotonin neurons in the DRN and MRN, resulting in serotonin release.
The stress-induced elevation of serotonergic activity67 raises the possibility that serotonin neurons are excited by aversive stimuli. However, some DRN neurons encode reward values positively (that is, they are excited by reward), whereas other DRN neurons encode reward values negatively (that is, they are excited by the absence of reward)73. Unlike dopamine and LHb neuron activity (both of which represent reward prediction errors41), DRN neuron activity seems to represent the value of the current reward. Indeed, the change in activity in these neurons tended to be greatest after a trial with a reward or no reward74. Thus, it seems that DRN neurons monitor how good or bad the current condition is and this information can be useful for choosing an appropriate behaviour (for example, fight, flee or relax). The results described above suggest that DRN neurons may monitor the stressfulness of a situation.
Many animals detect changes in electric or magnetic fields and use this information to perform various kinds of behaviour, such as navigation and prey-capture75. In the lamprey this electromagnetic-induced behaviour seems to be controlled by the habenula–IPN system76. As the electric field intensity increases, the lamprey’s behaviour switches from a locomotive to a non-locomotive mode, perhaps mimicking the transition from migratory to preying states76. This presumed function of the habenula is particularly significant for elucidating the basic function of the habenula because the sea lamprey is thought to be the most primitive of the vertebrate species.
Neurons that encode head direction have been found in several subcortical areas in the rat brain77. It has been suggested that the habenula–IPN system may provide idiothetic cues for head direction through its connection to the dorsal tegmental nucleus78. This hypothesis may be supported by the finding that some neurons in the LHb change their activity in relation to angular head velocity. Neurons that show activity that is related to running speed are also present in the LHb and the IPN79.
Female rats with lesions of the LHb have severe disruptions of all components of maternal behaviour, including pup-retrieving, nursing, and nest-building80. The inputs from the medial and lateral preoptic area to the LHb may be crucial for its role in the regulation of maternal behaviour81. Dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens has also been shown to be crucial for maternal behaviour82 and this suggests that the LHb may contribute to maternal behaviour through its effect on dopamine neurons in the VTA, which project to the nucleus accumbens.
Prolonged exposure to pain and stress in humans has been associated with major depression64. Several lines of evidence suggest that LHb neurons are hyperactive in individuals with depression. In rat models of depression (induced by stress, injections of α-methylpara-tyrosine or withdrawal from chronic amphetamine) neural activity (assessed with 2-deoxyglucose or cytochrome oxidase staining) has been found to be lower in most brain areas compared with control rats, but to be increased in the LHb83, MHb and IPN66. In accordance with these results, lesions of the habenula in rat models of depression have been found to cause a reduction in depression-like behaviour84. In human patients with depression, depleting plasma tryptophan to temporarily reduce brain serotonin synthesis was found to activate the habenula and DRN12,85. There was a strong correlation between activity in these two areas12 and in both areas activity also correlated negatively with mood ratings.
A major behavioural expression of depression is reduced motor activity83. In fact, motor suppression is used to assess depression-like behaviour in animals. It is possible that reduced neural activity in the basal ganglia contributes to reduced motor suppression in individuals with depression. Indeed, blood flow or metabolism is reduced in the basal ganglia nuclei in patients with major depression86 and this reduction may be related to reduced dopaminergic transmission87. Dopamine hypoactivity reduces motivation88, which is another hallmark of depression. Considering the inhibitory effect of the LHb on dopamine neurons, it is possible that the reduced motor activity in major depression is caused by hyperactivity of the LHb leading to hypoactivity of dopamine neurons (FIG. 2b), although this has not been investigated.
In addition, evidence suggests that major depression is mediated by serotonin neurons. A major theory of depression implicates altered serotonin levels in the brain as a cause of depression and this theory is supported by the successful treatment of depression with serotonin reuptake inhibitors89. It is possible that changes in serotonin release may be caused by an enhanced inhibitory signal from the LHb. In rat models of depression, lesioning of the habenula alleviates depression-like behaviour and eliminates the increased extracellular serotonin levels in the DRN90 and the increased serotonin turnover in the DRN84.
Depression is also associated with abnormalities in the circadian rhythm and with sleep disturbances34. These symptoms are often explained by dysfunctions of the serotonin system as serotonin is essential for normal sleep regulation34. However, based on the proposed role of the habenula in sleep that is discussed above it is possible that dysfunctions of the habenula underlie these sleep-related symptoms.
Hyperactivity of the habenula may also contribute to the symptoms of depression by modulating the neuro–immune system. Cytokines have been implicated as a contributing factor in mood disorders including depression91. In the brain, IL-18, a pro-inflammatory cytokine, is highly and uniquely expressed in the MHb62. Moreover, IL-18 levels in the MHb are elevated in response to bacterial infections and emotional stress, which cause sleep disturbances and possibly fatigue (aspects of ‘sickness behaviour’)26.
These data suggest, but do not provide direct evidence for, a link between habenula activity and major depression. They have nevertheless inspired proposals for the treatment of major depression using deep brain stimulation (DBS) to manipulate the activity of the habenula92,93. A first successful treatment of a patient with severe treatment-resistant depression using DBS of the habenula has been reported94. This result is consistent with the hypothesis that DBS suppresses the abnormally elevated activity of the habenula, as postulated for other DBS treatments (for example, DBS of the subgenual cingulate cortex for major depression95 and DBS of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson’s disease96).
The habenula may also be involved in other psychiatric disorders, such as drug-induced psychosis and schizophrenia. Excessive intake of amphetamine or cocaine is associated with changes in central dopamine transmission and can cause paranoia, mania, delusions, hallucinations and thought disorder, all of which resemble symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia97. Interestingly, both amphetamine and cocaine, when continuously administered in rats, cause a strong and highly localized degeneration of the fasciculus retroflexus, the main efferent path from the habenula97. Chronic administration of cocaine also leads to long-term activity changes in GABA neurons in the VTA or the RMTg, which are the main targets of the LHb98,99. These findings raise the possibility that human drug-induced psychosis may be caused partly by damage to the habenula and that schizophrenia may be associated with habenula dysfunction97.
This hypothesis is supported by the finding that calcification of the epithalamus (including the habenula) — which presumably impairs the function of the habenula — is found much more frequently in patients with chronic schizophrenia than in control subjects100. Moreover, an fMRI study has shown altered activation of the habenula in patients with schizophrenia.101 Following an error in a difficult matching-to-sample task, the habenula was activated in control subjects, but not in patients with schizophrenia. Based on these findings it is possible to speculate that dopamine neurons in the VTA and SNc of patients with schizophrenia may not receive appropriate inhibitory signals from the habenula and that this may underlie the patients’ observed deficit in learning from the errors101.
A learning deficit such as this may coexist with (and possibly underlie) the impairments in working memory, attention and executive functions that have been observed in patients with schizophrenia102. Notably, information processing in cortico-hippocampal areas is influenced by various neuromodulators including dopamine, serotonin, noradrenaline and acetyl choline103, and the release of all of these neuromodulators is under the control of the habenula11. Indeed, schizophrenia-related cognitive impairments, including those that relate to spatial memory and attention, can be simulated in rats by lesioning the habenula104. Experiments have also suggested that these cognitive deficits are partly mediated by enhanced dopamine activity in the nucleus accumbens and that this enhanced activity could be caused by removal of the LHb-mediated inhibition of dopamine neurons105.
The habenula may also be involved in nicotine addiction. Nicotine withdrawal causes unpleasant physical and psychological symptoms106. Although nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are widely distributed in the brain, the subtypes that mediate nicotine withdrawal responses are highly concentrated in the MHb and IPN107. Nicotinic receptor activation in the habenula may be important for memory because chronic blockade of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors causes an increase in errors during spatial memory tasks108. In addition, blocking nicotinic receptors in the MHb or IPN in animals that have been chronically treated with nicotine enhances withdrawal responses107. Interestingly, a high dose of nicotine causes massive degeneration almost exclusively in the MHb and its output tract, the fasciculus retroflexus109. Thus, symptoms associated with nicotine withdrawal may be caused by dysfunctions of the MHb and its output.
However, the extent to which the habenula may contribute to bringing about drug-induced psychosis and schizophrenia is unclear as the evidence to date has often been based on a small number of clinical cases. More systematic studies are necessary to address this question.
The fact that the habenula is present in virtually all vertebrate species, including those that seemingly lack cognitive functions1, suggests that it has an important role in survival through a relatively simple mechanism that is shared by all vertebrates. As described above, the habenula seems to be involved in various behaviours. Nonetheless, it is probably useful to seek a core function or mechanism for the habenula that is common to these behaviours. One prominent feature of the habenula (the LHb and the MHb) is that it is involved in the processing of aversive information, such as pain, stress and failure. Animals may fight or try to escape from aversive events, but in many cases they simply stop moving (‘freeze’) to evade the aversive events110. I propose that the primary function of the habenula is to suppress motor activity under such adverse conditions.
This hypothesis consists of two propositions: first, the role of the habenula is to suppress motor activity; and second, the habenula is activated under adverse conditions. Evidence for the first proposition comes from the finding that the LHb exerts a powerful inhibition on dopamine neurons. As dopamine neurons are thought to be a key modulator of body movement and motivation, their LHb-induced inhibition could contribute to the suppression of body movements and to reduced motivation. Considering the close association of the habenula with the pineal gland, the retinal input to the habenula and the circadian variations in habenula activity, it is tempting to speculate that from an early stage of vertebrate evolution the habenula has played a part in controlling general motor activity based on circadian rhythmicity111. How this motor control mechanism was used later in evolution was probably dependent on the type of information that habenula neurons came to receive.
The second proposition — that the habenula becomes active under adverse conditions — needs to be discussed in more detail because from this proposition arise seemingly diverse functions of the habenula. LHb neurons are excited by aversive stimuli, including stimuli that were initially neutral but that have been conditioned to predict aversive events. In the MHb, aversive stimuli or stress induces enzymatic and immunological responses. It is therefore possible that the LHb and MHb both respond to aversive stimuli, but in different ways; that is, aversive signals would be mediated by neural processes and conveyed to the LHb in addition to being mediated by immunological and enzymatic processes and conveyed to the MHb. However, it is important to note that evidence in support of this hypothesis is still sparse, in particular for the purported role of the MHb, and remains a topic for further study.
In response to an aversive event an animal may act to remove itself from the source of that event (for example, escape), and this requires quick motor responses. Conversely, cues that predict aversive outcomes often produce marked inhibitions of motor behaviour110. The motor suppression that is associated with aversion prediction may be mediated by the LHb-dopamine circuit — because the majority of LHb neurons are excited by aversive events — leading to an inhibition of dopamine neurons that consequently leads to a general suppression of body movements. In addition, the aversion-predicting activation of the LHb (and possibly the MHb) activates serotonin neurons in the raphe nuclei and therefore influences neural processing in a large part of the brain, although the specific behavioural outcomes of LHb-mediated serotonin modulations are still unclear.
Under repeated or continuous stress, animals and humans may show depression-like behaviour, as proposed by the ‘learned helplessness theory’64 and the ‘rank theory’112 of depression. In both schemes, depression is considered to be a form of behavioural adaptation to adverse conditions. More importantly, in the state of depression sensitization of the LHb-dopamine and LHb-serotonin circuits seems to occur (FIG. 2c). Indeed, in humans with depression and in animal models of depression the LHb becomes hyperactive12,83. This may cause the general motor suppression (through inhibition of dopamine neurons) as well as the mood changes (through changes in serotonin transmission) that are associated with depression.
Thus far, I have proposed that the habenula evolved as a general motor controller that was originally devoted to circadian control of behaviour. According to my hypothesis, at some point in evolution the brain areas that encode aversive signals acquired connections to the habenula. The habenula then became a suppressor of motor activities in response to, or in anticipation of, aversive events. Why did these particular connections occur and why were these connections maintained throughout evolution? A conceivable explanation is that the habenula and its efferent circuit enabled the aversive signal-carrying areas of the brain to gain an evolutionary value. In this scheme, the habenula circuit could be more actively exploited; it could be used for the learning of voluntary behaviour.
Learning of voluntary behaviour starts when an animal acts on the external world spontaneously. If the outcome of the action is favourable, the action is likely to be repeated, but if the outcome is unfavourable, the action is likely to be suppressed113. In this case the aversive event occurs as a result of the animal’s own action (which can therefore be considered a ‘failure’). As the LHb circuit was already used for stress-induced motor suppression, it was easily implemented for failure-induced motor suppression. This means that the habenula circuit must have improved the quality of information that it carries in at least two ways. First, the value of the outcome (rewarding or aversive) must be judged with respect to the expected outcome value (better or worse than expected) for the animal to establish which action results in the best outcome114. That is, the neurons should encode a reward prediction error signal, a feature that is represented in LHb and dopamine neurons, but not in serotonin neurons41,73. Second, the motor suppression should be specific to the action that caused the aversive outcome; the action that caused a favourable outcome (reward) should not be suppressed. This algorithm may be achieved by specific interactions between dopamine neurons (which carry value signals) and cortical and striatal neurons (which carry action signals)115 (FIG. 3).
This hypothesis illustrates how a simple motor controller may have evolved to become part of an important learning mechanism. As more brain areas (which may have evolved after the habenula) formed connections to the habenula, the functions of the habenula seem to have become more diverse. However, the habenula seems to have retained its core mechanism, namely to suppress body movements. This is probably what has happened to many other brain areas: a core mechanism remains, but the functions that the brain area performs vary depending on the connections that have been added to it over time.
I would like to thank my colleagues Masayuki Matsumoto, Simon Hong and Ethan Bromberg-Martin, who have discovered various properties of the primate habenula and have provided me with excellent ideas on the function of the habenula. I also thank Ilya Monosov for helping me improve the manuscript. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program at the National Institutes of Health, National Eye Institute.
Competing interests statement
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Author’s homepage: http://www.nei.nih.gov/intramural/lsr\hikosaka\hikosaka.asp
ALL LINKS ARE ACTIVE IN THE ONLINE PDF