PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcgeriBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Geriatrics
 
BMC Geriatr. 2012; 12: 44.
Published online Aug 10, 2012. doi:  10.1186/1471-2318-12-44
PMCID: PMC3444350
Older adults’ home- and community-based care service use and residential transitions: a longitudinal study
Ya-Mei Chencorresponding author#1 and Bobbie Berkowitz#2
1National Taiwan University, College of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy and Management, Room 633, No.1 7, Xu-Zhou Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan
2Columbia University, School of Nursing, 630 West 168th St., MC6, New York, NY 10032, USA
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
#Contributed equally.
Ya-Mei Chen: chenyamei/at/ntu.edu.tw; Bobbie Berkowitz: bb2509/at/columbia.edu
Received November 10, 2011; Accepted July 26, 2012.
Abstract
Background
As Home-and Community-Based Services (HCBS), such as skilled nursing services or personal care services, have become increasingly available, it has become clear that older adults transit through different residential statuses over time. Older adults may transit through different residential statuses as the various services meet their needs. The purpose of this exploratory study was to better understand the interplay between community-dwelling older adults’ use of home- and community-based services and their residential transitions.
Methods
The study compared HCBS service-use patterns and residential transitions of 3,085 older adults from the Second Longitudinal Study of Aging. Based on older adults’ residential status at the three follow-up interviews, four residential transitions were tracked: (1) Community-Community-Community (CCC: Resided in community during the entire study period); (2) Community-Institution-Community (CIC: Resided in community at T1, had lived in an institution at some time between T1 and T2, then had returned to community by T3); (3) Community-Community-Institution (CCI: Resided in community between at T1, and betweenT1 and T2, including at T2, but had used institutional services between T2 and T3); (4) Community-Institution-Institution (CII: Resided in community at T1 but in an institution at some time between T1 and T2, and at some time between T2 and T3.).
Results
Older adults’ use of nondiscretionary and discretionary services differed significantly among the four groups, and the patterns of HCBS use among these groups were also different. Older adults’ use of nondiscretionary services, such as skilled nursing care, may help them to return to communities from institutions. Personal care services (PCS) and senior center services may be the key to either support elders to stay in communities longer or help elders to return to their communities from institutions. Different combinations of PCS with other services, such as senior center services or meal services, were associated with different directions in residential transition, such as CIC and CII respectively.
Conclusions
Older adults’ differing HCBS use patterns may be the key to explaining older adults’ transitions. Attention to older adults’ HCBS use patterns is recommended for future practice. However, this was an exploratory study and the analyses cannot establish causal relationships.
Keywords: Older adults, Home- and community-based care services (HCBS), Service use patterns, Policy implications, Residential transitions.
Articles from BMC Geriatrics are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central