PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcophtBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Ophthalmology
 
BMC Ophthalmol. 2012; 12: 32.
Published online 2012 August 1. doi:  10.1186/1471-2415-12-32
PMCID: PMC3441224
In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy
Giulio Ferrari,corresponding author1 Verena Reichegger,2 Luca Ludergnani,2 Elisabetta Delfini,2 and Claudio Macaluso2
1G.B. Bietti Eye Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
2Dept. of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Giulio Ferrari: giulio.ferrari/at/schepens.harvard.edu; Verena Reichegger: verena.reichegger/at/rolmail.net; Luca Ludergnani: ludergna/at/hotmail.it; Elisabetta Delfini: elisabetta.delfini/at/unipr.it; Claudio Macaluso: claudio.macaluso/at/unipr.it
Received March 5, 2012; Accepted June 29, 2012.
Abstract
Background
Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) allows selective replacement of the endothelium. Post-operative haze and particles can affect the interface quality and, ultimately, visual outcome. In this study, we evaluated DSAEK interface with in vivo laser confocal microscopy (LCM) in order to: (i) correlate interface status with best corrected visual acuity, and (ii) with time from surgery; (iii) correlate interface particle number with best corrected visual acuity. Host-donor interface was imaged and graded using a published reflectivity scale. Particles at the interface were counted.
Methods
18 eyes of 16 patients (6 males and 10 females); mean age: 74 ± 8.3 years which underwent DSAEK were examined by means of in vivo laser confocal microscopy between 1 and 24 months after surgery. Host-donor interface was imaged and graded using a published reflectivity scale. Particles present at the interface were counted.
Results
Interface reflectivity was 2.17 ± 1.2 and significantly correlated with visual acuity (Spearman correlation coefficient −0.83; P < 0.001), and with time after surgery (Spearman correlation coefficient −0.87; P < 0.001). Visual acuity was 0.67 ± 0.27. The number of particles was 205 ± 117.8; no correlation was found between this number and visual acuity (Spearman correlation coefficient −0.41; P = 0.15).
Conclusion
DSAEK interface imaged with LCM is helpful in diagnosing poor host-donor interface quality in DSAEK surgery. A good quality interface is related to a better visual acuity. Moreover, the quality of the interface appears to improve as time passes from the surgery. Interface quality is related with visual acuity and improves with time from surgery. LCM should be considered as an added tool in post-DSAEK follow-up of patients. Finally, our study shows that the presence of particles does not influence visual outcome.
Keywords: DSAEK, Interface, Laser corneal confocal microscopy
Articles from BMC Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central