PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcmidmBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
 
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12: 59.
Published online 2012 June 28. doi:  10.1186/1472-6947-12-59
PMCID: PMC3439324
Efficient algorithms for fast integration on large data sets from multiple sources
Tian Mi,corresponding author1 Sanguthevar Rajasekaran,corresponding author1 and Robert Aseltine2
1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut Storrs, Connecticut, USA
2Institute for Public Health Research, University of Connecticut, East Hartford, Connecticut, USA
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Tian Mi: tian.mi/at/engr.uconn.edu; Sanguthevar Rajasekaran: rajasek/at/engr.uconn.edu; Robert Aseltine: aseltine/at/uchc.edu
Received October 24, 2011; Accepted June 28, 2012.
Abstract
Background
Recent large scale deployments of health information technology have created opportunities for the integration of patient medical records with disparate public health, human service, and educational databases to provide comprehensive information related to health and development. Data integration techniques, which identify records belonging to the same individual that reside in multiple data sets, are essential to these efforts. Several algorithms have been proposed in the literatures that are adept in integrating records from two different datasets. Our algorithms are aimed at integrating multiple (in particular more than two) datasets efficiently.
Methods
Hierarchical clustering based solutions are used to integrate multiple (in particular more than two) datasets. Edit distance is used as the basic distance calculation, while distance calculation of common input errors is also studied. Several techniques have been applied to improve the algorithms in terms of both time and space: 1) Partial Construction of the Dendrogram (PCD) that ignores the level above the threshold; 2) Ignoring the Dendrogram Structure (IDS); 3) Faster Computation of the Edit Distance (FCED) that predicts the distance with the threshold by upper bounds on edit distance; and 4) A pre-processing blocking phase that limits dynamic computation within each block.
Results
We have experimentally validated our algorithms on large simulated as well as real data. Accuracy and completeness are defined stringently to show the performance of our algorithms. In addition, we employ a four-category analysis. Comparison with FEBRL shows the robustness of our approach.
Conclusions
In the experiments we conducted, the accuracy we observed exceeded 90% for the simulated data in most cases. 97.7% and 98.1% accuracy were achieved for the constant and proportional threshold, respectively, in a real dataset of 1,083,878 records.
Articles from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central