Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Biochim Biophys Acta. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 November 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3438339

Radical reactions of thiamin pyrophosphate in 2-oxoacid oxidoreductases


Thiamin pyrophosphate (TPP) is essential in carbohydrate metabolism in all forms of life. TPP-dependent decarboxylation reactions of 2-oxo-acid substrates result in enamine adducts between the thiazolium moiety of the coenzyme and decarboxylated substrate. These central enamine intermediates experience different fates from protonation in pyruvate decarboxylase to oxidation by the 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase complexes, the pyruvate oxidases, and 2-oxoacid oxidoreductases. Virtually all of the TPP-dependent enzymes, including pyruvate decarboxylase, can be assayed by 1-electron redox reactions linked to ferricyanide. Oxidation of the enamines is thought to occur via a 2-electron process in the 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase complexes, wherein acyl group transfer is associated with reduction of the disulfide of the lipoamide moiety. However, discrete 1-electron steps occur in the oxidoreductases, where one or more [4Fe-4S] clusters mediate the electron transfer reactions to external electron acceptors. These radical intermediates can be detected in the absence of the acyl-group acceptor, coenzyme A (CoASH). The π-electron system of the thiazolium ring stabilizes the radical. The extensively delocalized character of the radical is evidenced by quantitative analysis of nuclear hyperfine splitting tensors as detected by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and by electronic structure calculations. The second electron transfer step is markedly accelerated by the presence of CoASH. While details of the second electron transfer step and its facilitation by CoASH remain elusive, expected redox properties of potential intermediates limit possible scenarios.

1. Introduction

Thiamin pyrophosphate (TPP), the coenzyme form of vitamin B1, promotes reversible cleavage of carbon-carbon bonds between carbonyl and alcoholic groups or between vicinal carbonyl groups (Scheme 1) [1].

Scheme 1
Examples of bonds cleaved in TPP-dependent reactions

TPP provides the means for stabilization of the acyl anions that are implicit in these cleavages [1]. TPP is essential for the metabolism of carbohydrates and is therefore ubiquitous to living organisms. Reactions of TPP-dependent enzymes are invariably multistep processes. The first step is ionization of the thiazolium moiety of TPP to form a zwitterion or ylide-like species that subsequently adds to the carbonyl carbon of the substrate (Scheme 2) [2].

Scheme 2
Formation of lactyl-TPP

The resulting adducts serve as the precursors for the cleavages shown in Scheme 1. The decarboxylated products (such as hydroxyethylidene-TPP (HE-TPP), Scheme 3) are central intermediates in all TPP-dependent reactions [3, 4].

Scheme 3
Decarboxylation of lactyl-TPP to give HE-TPP

These intermediates are capable of giving up electrons one-at-a-time, as evidenced by the fact that even TPP-dependent enzymes, including pyruvate decarboxylase, which physiologically catalyzes decarboxylation without oxidation, can be assayed by the reduction of ferricyanide, which is an obligate one-electron acceptor [5, 6].

In the 2-oxoacid oxidoreductases and in the pyruvate oxidases [7], a one electron oxidation of the enamine intermediate results in a radical that achieves some degree of stabilization by delocalization onto the thiazole/thiazolium ring of the coenzyme [6, 8]. This HE-TPP radical can exist as a cation or neutral species (Scheme 4) and both species have multiple resonance structures that distribute the unpaired spin density over the hydroxyethylidene and thiazolium moieties. Persistent π-radicals have been generated electrochemically from thiamin analogs and active aldehydes [9].

Scheme 4
One-electron oxidation of HE-TPP to produce the HE-TPP radical

The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of the corresponding radicals obtained from pyruvate: ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFOR) and 2-oxoglutarate: ferredoxin oxidoreductase (OFOR) for the enzymes from the archaeon, Halobacterium salinarium (formerly Halobacterium halobium) were reported more than 30 years ago[10]. These enzymes purify from the organism with a significant amount of the radical signal present even under aerobic conditions, which indicates that the radicals are unusually robust. The HE-TPP radicals derived from PFORs of most species have shorter lifetimes. The HE-TPP radical of the PFOR from Desulfovibrio africanus appears upon addition of pyruvate to the reductively activated enzyme, and the radical persists for at least several minutes [11]. In contrast, the HE-TPP radical from Moorella thermoacetica has a half-life of ~ 1.5 min at room temperature under anaerobic conditions [12]. Despite differences in apparent stability, EPR spectra of radicals derived from pyruvate with PFORs from different organisms are virtually identical (see Fig. 1). The partially resolved features in the EPR spectra reflect hyperfine interactions with nuclear spins in the radical and are therefore indicators of the location of unpaired spin density and associated electronic structure [13]. The EPR spectra, therefore, indicate that the HE-TPP radicals from PFORs of diverse organisms have the same electronic structure.

Fig. 1
EPR spectra (X-band) of the radical formed upon addition of pyruvate to PFORs from diverse organisms. A Moorella thermoaceticum [48], B Desulfovobrio africanus [39], C Halobacterium salinarium [10], D Methanosarcina barkeri [61].

As noted above, the capacity to undergo one-electron oxidation is not restricted to the enamine intermediates in the 2-oxoacid oxidoreductases. For example, a radical corresponding to the one-electron-oxidized enamine-thiazolium intermediate has been characterized in the E1o component of the 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex from Escherichia coli under aerobic conditions [14]. In this case, O2 intercepts the enamine-thiazolium intermediate in an “off-pathway” reaction that would produce the radical and superoxide eventually leading to production of other “reactive oxygen species” (ROS). This review will focus on the 2-oxoacid oxidoreductase, PFOR, its radical intermediate, and electron transfer properties. Inferences for other members of the 2-oxoacid oxidoreductases and pyruvate oxidases will be considered. Recent comprehensive overviews of TPP-dependent enzymes and of PFOR are available [1, 4, 1519].

2. Pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFOR)

2.1 Reaction and physiological context

PFOR (EC catalyzes the TPP-dependent oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate with production of acetyl-CoA and reducing equivalents typically harvested by electron transfer to external ferredoxins (Fd) (see eq. 1).

pyruvate+CoASH+2Fdox[right harpoon over left harpoon]CO2+acetylCoA+2Fdred+2H+.

The stoichiometry of 2 Fd in eq. 1 is used to emphasize the fact that two electrons are produced in the reaction; however, the external Fd entities that receive these electrons sometimes contain a pair of [4Fe-4S] clusters that capture both reducing equivalents produced in the reaction.

Phylogenetic analyses suggest that PFOR is an ancient enzyme that appeared before the divergence of archaea and eukaryotes [16]. PFOR is ubiquitous among archaea, has a significant representation among bacteria, and is found in amitochondriate protists such as Giardia lamblia and Trichomonas vaginalis [20]. In the forward direction, the reaction allows for the anaerobic oxidative decarboxyation of pyruvate and harvesting of the “low potential” reducing equivalents to drive other reactions such as reduction of sulfate, N2, or protons [16]. The reaction is reversible [21, 22] –the pyruvate synthase activity assimilating CO2 in organisms, including methanogens [23], that use the Wood-Ljungdahl or the reductive tricarboxylic acid pathways [24, 25]. The presence of PFOR in numerous pathogenic microbes and its absence in higher animals make it a drug target. Many current therapies exploit the low potential electrons generated in the reaction to activate reductively pro-drugs such as metronidazole [26, 27].

2.2 Structures and cofactor content

Quaternary structures of PFORs vary among species [2830]. The quaternary structures separate into four groups: homodimers (α2); dimers of heterotetramers (αβγδ)2; dimers of heterotrimers (αβγ)2; and heterodimers (αβ)2. The dimers are proposed to have arisen from various gene fusions from an ancestral heterotetrmeric protein such as those found in archaea [18]. In some cases, e. g., in the H. salinarium enzyme, a fusion of the α and γ subunits can be isolated as a homodimer containing only the binding site of TPP and Cys residues corresponding to a single [4Fe-4S] cluster. A separate Fd containing two [4Fe-4S] clusters binds to the heterodimer [2932]. Thus, in terms of cofactor content, there are two classes of PFOR–those having three [4Fe-4S] clusters and those having just a single [4Fe-4S] cluster.

Currently, ten of the eleven entries for crystallographically determined structures of PFOR in the PDB are for the homodimeric enzyme from D. africanus. One view of the homodimer is provided in Figure 2. The 3-D structures show that the three [4Fe-4S] clusters in the homodimeric protein are optimally spaced [33] to provide an effective internal electron transport pathway that can shuttle electrons between the active site and the external surface of the protein [19]. The redox potentials of the three [4Fe-4S] clusters in D. africanus PFOR are reported to be −390 mV, −515 mV, and −540 mV [11]. Addition of pyruvate to the “resting state” (i. e., three [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters) of the homodimeric PFOR from M. thermoacetica generates the HE-TPP radical and a single reducing equivalent in the chain of Fe-S clusters. The magnitude of the electron-electron dipole-dipole interaction between the HE-TPP radical and the [4Fe-4S]+1 cluster, as determined in electron-electron double resonance experiments, corresponds to an interspin distance of ~32 Å. This distance correlates with a model in which the medial cluster harbors the unpaired electron following the one-electron oxidation of HE-TPP [34]. Thus electron transfer from HE-TPP through the proximal cluster to the medial cluster occurs in the first stage of the oxidation.

Fig. 2
Ribbon representation of the homodimer of PFOR from D. africanus (PDB ID: 1KEK). The Fe-S clusters, divalent cations (green), and TPP-pyruvate adduct are highlighted as space filling models.

2.3 Reaction sequence and intermediates

The sequence of reactions outlined in Schemes 24 leads to the HE-TPP radical, CO2, and one reducing equivalent. The second electron transfer step from the radical to the [4Fe-4S]2+ acceptor is chemically gated [35] by the acetyl group acceptor, CoA. CoA stimulates the rate of electron transfer from the HE-TPP radical to the iron sulfur clusters in the PFOR from M. thermoacetica by 105 fold [36]. In the related enzyme, pyruvate oxidase (POX) from Lactobacillus plantarum, the acetyl group acceptor, Pi, produces a 102–103 -fold enhancement in the rate of electron transfer from the HE-TPP radical to the semi-flavin FAD moiety in the active site [7]. The reaction scheme of PFOR is outlined in Scheme 5.

Scheme 5
Overall reaction of PFOR

Intermediates in this scheme include the lactyl-TPP, HE-TPP, and the HE-TPP radical. Crystallographic investigations of the related enzyme, POX, have provided electron density maps consistent with lactyl-TPP and with HE-TPP bound in the active site [37]. Crystals of PFOR from D. africanus grown and maintained at pH 6.2 show electron density of pyruvate near to C2 of TPP [38]. Interpretations of difference electron density maps in pyruvate-soaked crystals of PFOR crystals at higher pH values [39, 40] have not been as straightforward as in the case of POX. Assignments based on the difference density have led to a hypothesis for the structure of the HE-TPP radical that has a C2-C2α bond of unprecedented length as well as unusual tautomerizations around the thiazol ring [39]. Moreover, these maps have led to the suggestion that, in PFOR, the HE-TPP (enamine) intermediate is somehow by-passed in the overall reaction [40, 41].

Interpretations of difference density maps from crystals expected to contain the HE-TPP radical intermediate have led to the proposal that the radical has an unconventional electronic structure described as a σ/n cation radical (Scheme 6) [39, 40].

Scheme 6
Proposed model of a σ/n cation radical for the HE-TPPP radical

The atomic models proposed to fit into the difference density had C2–C2α distances of 1.95 Å and 1.75Å for molecules A and B in asymmetric unit. Exceptionally long carbon-carbon bonds are a continuing curiosity [42, 43]. An empirical correlation of carbon-carbon bond lengths and dissociation energies predicts that bonds longer than 1.748 Å will have zero bond dissociation energy [44]. Moreover, precedent cited for the exceptionally long bonds in σ/n cation radicals was based largely on computations [45]. Higher-level treatments of the “title member” of this group of radicals, the ethane cation, have subsequently concluded that the carbon-carbon bond distance is “normal” [42, 46] as opposed the a 1.908Å distance suggested from earlier calculations. Neither of the C2–C2α distances in the above model of the σ/n cation radical is consistent with the established persistence of the HE-TPP radical in D. africanus [11] or in H. salinarium [10] at room temperatures. Catalytic groups that would be expected to effect the required tautomerizations and resulting proton transfers at C2, C4, C4α and C5 are not in evidence in the active site.

The characteristic EPR spectrum of the HE-TPP radical (see Figure 1) is an envelope of partially resolved hyperfine structure arising from interactions of the unpaired electron with 1H and 14N nuclear spins. This underlying structure can be elaborated by subjecting spectra collected at high signal-to-noise ratios to resolution enhancement [47]. Changes in the basic splitting pattern upon regio-specific introduction of 13C or 15N into the substrate or thiazolium moieties (isotope editing) can be elaborated and hyperfine-splitting tensors determined through spectral simulation as illustrated in Fig. 3. The magnitudes of the hyperfine splitting constants are measures of unpaired spin density and hence the electronic structure of the radical. Electronic structure calculations can then be used to compare experimentally determined tensors with those expected for different models of the radical. Analysis of the nuclear hyperfine splitting in the EPR spectra of the radical generated with 2H, 13C, and 15N substitutions in the substrate, pyruvate, and in the thiazolium moiety of TPP were fully consistent with a π-radical having the unpaired spin delocalized over the hydroxyethylidene and thiazolium moieties [48]. The unpaired spin distribution in the HE-TPP radical suggested that the ionization state of the radical was intermediate between that expected for the cation and neutral radical species, which indicated that the radical was likely participating in a hydrogen bond. Given its expected proximity to C2αO of the radical [39], the exocyclic amino group of the substituted pyrimidine moiety of TPP was proposed as a logical intramolecular H-bonding partner. A planar π-radical provided a closer fit to the X-ray coordinates than did a properly formulated model of the σ/n cation radical [48].

Fig. 3
EPR spectrum (77 K) of the HE-TPP radical obtained from samples made up from [2-13C]-pyruvate with PFOR from M. thermoacetica. The experimental spectrum was collected at high signal-to-noise ratio by scan averaging and subjected to resolution enhancement ...

Although the aminopyrimidine moiety of TPP is not conjugated to the π–electron system of the hydroxyethylidine/thiazollium moieties, its potential H-bonding interaction with C2αO(H) can influence unpaired spin distribution in the radical-bearing part of the system. Truncated models of TPP (lacking the aminopyrimidine portion) were used in the earlier electronic structure calculations. This truncation simplification of TPP and the absence of the protein matrix have been suggested as potential sources of discrepancies between competing models of the radical [41]. DFT calculations (Gaussian 09) [49] were performed that included the aminopyrimidine moiety and active site residues Arg114 and Glu64 in order to assess their influences on the structure of the radical. An isosurface plot of spin densities of the resulting energy minimized structure is shown in Fig. 4. In the earlier calculations, it was noted that a primary effect of protonation at C2αO was a shift in spin density from C2 to C2α [48]. As shown in Figure 4, a similar shift of spin density occurs upon inclusion of H-bonding interactions at C2αO such that the calculated 13C hyperfine splitting tensors at C2 and at C2α are closer to the experimentally determined values and about midway between the those calculated for models of C2αO or C2αOH. In E1o component of the 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex, a similar shift in unpaired spin upon formation of the C2aOH tautomer of the TPP radical intermediate was calculated [14].

Fig. 4
Isosurface plots of spin density in an energy-minimized model of the HE-TPP radical obtained from DFT calculations (B3LYP/6-31G*//B3LYP/TZVP using Gaussian 09) [49] that include the aminopyrimidine moiety of TPP and the active site residues Arg 114 and ...

The possibility of differences in the electronic structures of the HE-TPP radical among PFORs from different species (e. g., M. thermoacetica and D. africanus) has also been suggested as a potential source of discrepancies in proposed structures of the HE-TPP radical [41]. However, as shown in Fig. 1, the EPR spectra of the HE-TPP intermediate are identical not only for PFORs from M. thermoacetica and D. africanus, but also for PFORs from other organisms. The EPR spectra leave no doubt that the same radical is responsible for the spectra and therefore that the electronic structures are identical.

2.4 Characteristics of the second electron transfer step

The HE-TPP radical is observed in the absence of the acetyl group acceptor substrate, CoASH. As noted above, the lifetime of the HE-TPP radical varies substantially from species to species. Although it has evidently not been established, one expects that an off-pathway, one-electron-oxidation of the radical would produce acetyl-TPP–the hydrolysis of which would lead to acetate and TPP. Lifetime differences of the radical among different PFORs might reflect accessibility of oxidants or accessibility of solvent to the active sites [39]. The origin of the 105 -fold enhancement in the rate of the second electron transfer step by CoASH is of obvious interest [36]. For PFOR from M. thermoacetica, decay of the radical in the absence of CoA behaved as a true electron-transfer reaction according to an analysis using Marcus theory. A similar analysis showed that electron transfer was chemically gated in the presence of CoA. Several possible explanations for gating by CoA were considered. The 105-fold change in rate would require a change in distance between the donor (HE-TPP radical) and acceptor ([4Fe-4S]2+) of > 8 Å [50], and this was considered to be unlikely especially given the fact the desulfo analog of CoA decreases the rate of the electron transfer by 10-fold. The experiments with desulfo-CoA also make it unlikely that some unusual electron transfer pathway is elaborated whenever CoA is bound. Two other possibilities for the CoA chemical gating were considered: 1) nucleophilic attack of the CoAS on C2α of the radical to form an anion radical adduct; 2) one electron oxidation of the CoAS(H) to a thiyl radical by a [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster and combination of the thiyl radical with the HE-TPP radical [36].

Formulations of the hypothetical anion radical adduct are shown in Scheme 7.

Scheme 7
Hypothetical CoA anion radical adducts

(The formulation in B Scheme 7 is more energetically feasible because the radical could be delocalized onto the thiazole ring.) The 105-fold rate enhancement through a change in the thermodynamic driving force alone, would require an ~ 630 mV change in the redox potential of the anion radical adduct relative to the parent HE-TPP radical species [36]. Formation of an anion radical adduct between Pi and the HE-TPP radical was also proposed to account for the increase in electron transfer rate from the radical to the flavin in POX [7]. Preliminary electronic structure calculations using methane thiolate as a truncated form of CoAS suggest that the anion radical adduct would indeed enhance the reducing capacity of the radical by an amount greater than that required to promote the increase in electron transfer rate. Questions, however, arise regarding the susceptibility of C2α in the radical towards nucleophilic substitution. Potential acetyl group transfers from synthetic acetyl-TPP to hydroxylamine, 2-mercaptoethanol, dihydrolipoic acid, and Pi have been investigated in aqueous solution. Hydroxylamine and to a much smaller extent, 2-mercaptoethanol are able to trap the acetyl group [51]. One expects that the reactivity of the one electron reduced version of acetyl-TPP to show somewhat lower reactivity than is observed with acetyl-TPP. Keeping in mind that the reaction is reversible, the addition product of the ylide of TPP and acetyl-CoA would need to undergo a one-electron reduction by reduced ferredoxins to reach the same anion radical intermediate state. Energetic issues associated with this reduction are yet to be determined although the attack of the ylide on the carbonyl of acetyl-CoA is a logical early step in the reverse reaction.

The intermediacy of a thiyl radical form of CoA leading to a radical combination event with the HE-TPP radical has been proposed [36, 39]. The scenario for this radical combination step is outlined in Scheme 8 wherein the protonation state at C2αO is arbitrary.

Scheme 8
Hypothetical radical combination mechanism

The thiyl radical of CoA in Scheme 8 is proposed to arise from one electron oxidation of CoA by one of the [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters [36]. Although EPR analysis showed the presence of a single [4Fe-4S]1+ cluster in PFOR from M. thermoacetica incubated with CoA, a thiyl radical was not detected [12]. Thiyl radicals are strong oxidants [52], and oxidation of CoA to a thiyl radical by a low potential bacterial ferredoxin raises energetic issues. Conditions for reconstitution of Fe-S clusters or repair of damaged ones invariably include various thiol containing compounds [53]. The reverse direction is problematic because homolytic cleavage of the carbon-sulfur bond is unlikely to occur spontaneously. Moreover, the radical recombination scenario is not available for the related chemical gating by Pi of the second electron transfer reaction from the HE-TPP radical in POX [7].

A variation of the thiyl radical recombination was proposed to exploit the hypothetical σ/n cation radical (Scheme 6) intermediate. In this proposal, the σ/n cation radical would fragment to an acetyl σ radical that would then combine with the thiyl radical to produce acetyl-CoA directly [39]. In addition to the issues related to the existence of a σ/n cation radical in PFOR, this mechanism runs into additional difficulties when viewed in the reverse direction. In the reverse reaction the carbon-sulfur bond of acetyl-CoA (expected bond dissociation energy 66–75 kcal M−1 [54]) would be required to undergo homolytic cleavage with a subsequent attack of the acetyl σ radical at C2 of the TPP moiety. The resulting radical would need to tautomerize as required to achieve that non-planar structure shown in Scheme 6.

What can be concluded regarding the second electron transfer step of PFOR in the forward direction is that binding of CoA and its thiol/thiolate group greatly facilitates oxidation of the HE-TPP radical intermediate by the resident [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster [36]. It is not yet clear whether the electron arises from the HE-TPP radical or from an adduct of this radical with CoA. The much slower oxidation of the radical that occurs in the absence CoA would lead to acetyl-TPP or its hydrate or carbinolamine with the aminopyrimidine moiety of the cofactor [51]. Of course, all of the players in the reaction scheme must reverse their roles in the synthesis of pyruvate, from acetyl-CoA, two reducing equivalents, and CO2.

2.5 Hydrogenase activity of PFOR

In some microbes, the ultimate fate of the reducing equivalents derived from the PFOR catalyzed oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate is to serve as fuel for the hydrogenosomal production of H2 [55]. Coupling of pyruvate oxidation to sulfate or proton reduction is also accomplished by species of PFOR containing sulfate-reducing bacteria [56]. In the absence of external electron acceptors, PFOR, itself functions as a hydrogenase [57]. The kcat of H2 evolution measured for PFOR from M. thermoacetica is 0.3 s−1, and the products, H2 and acetyl-CoA, are present at a 1:1 stoichiometry (eq. 2).

pyruvate+CoASH[right harpoon over left harpoon]CO2+acetylCoA+H2

The same preparations of PFOR yielded a kcat of ~33 s−1 using methyl viologen as the electron acceptor. Since an analogous side reaction hasn’t been reported for POX, one can reasonably conclude that the reduced [4Fe-4S] clusters of PFOR are sites of proton reduction. The hydrogenase activity of PFOR in the absence of external electron carriers serves as a “relief valve.” This side activity also complicates detection of intermediates in the CoA dependent part of the reaction, although transient kinetic methods might still work.

3. Other 2-oxoacid Oxidoreductases

3.1 CoA-dependent 2-oxoacid oxidoreductases

The CoA-dependent 2-oxoacid oxidoreductases, PFOR, 2-oxoglutarate oxidoreductase (KGFOR), 2-oxoisovalerate oxidoreductase (VFOR), and indolepyruvate oxidoreductase (IPFOR) reinforce the concept that cognate enzymes facilitate the catalytic function of their coenzyme–in this case, TPP. Indeed in many cases for this group of enzymes, there is significant cross reactivity among the various substrates [23]. To the extent that they have been investigated, features of the proposed catalytic cycles of these other enzyme that are shared with PFOR include formation and decarboxylation of the TPP adduct to generate the respective enamines, one electron oxidation of the enamine to form the radical intermediate, and subsequent CoA promoted oxidation of the radical and formation of the respective acyl-CoA product. The EPR spectra of the enamine-derived radicals differ slightly from those of the HE-TPP radical in PFOR because of replacement of the methyl group at C2β with the respective chain of the substrate. Hyperfine splitting of one of the b-protons of the methyl group is missing and the orientation of the R-CH2- may alter the extent of hyperconjugation of the remaining methylene protons at C2β[10, 58]

3.2 Oxalate oxidoreductase

The recently discovered oxalate oxidoreductase (OOR) from M. thermoacetica catalyzes the reaction given in eq. 3 [59].


The enzyme contains TPP and three [4Fe-4S] clusters; however, unlike the other 2-oxoacid oxidoreductases, it does not require CoA. Addition of oxalate causes reduction of the [4Fe-4S] clusters to the +1 paramagnetic state as observed by EPR. Any organic radical intermediates generated decay within the time required for manual mixing and freezing of the sample (~30 s). A plausible mechanism for OOR it sketched in Scheme 9.

Scheme 9
Proposed mechanism of OOR

M. thermoacetica is a strict anaerobe. OOR allows the bacterium to grow on oxalate as a sole source of carbon and energy. The CO2 that is generated in the reaction and the reducing equivalents are linked to the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway of autotrophic acetyl-CoA formation [60]. OOR catalyzes oxidation of glyoxalate at rate comparable to that observed with oxalate. 2-Oxobutyrate, pyruvate, oxaloacetate, 2-oxovalerate, and 2-oxoglutarate are also oxidized at about a ten-fold slower rate [59].


We are grateful to Drs. Craig A. Bingman and George N. Phillips for providing access to computer clusters and Gaussian 09. We thank Drs. Perry A. Frey and W. W. Cleland for helpful discussions. S.W.R. and S.O.M. acknowledge support from the National Institutes of Health Grants NIGMS GM39451 and GM40541, respectively.


This article is part of a Special issue entitled: Radical SAM and Radical Enzymology

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.


1. Frey PA, Hegeman AD. Enzymatic reaction mechanisms. Oxford University Press; New York: 2007.
2. Breslow R. On the mechanism of thiamine action. IV. Evidence from studies on model systems. J Am Chem Soc. 1958;80:3719–3726.
3. Krampitz LO, Votaw R. α-Hydroxyethylthiamine diphosphate and α, β-dihydroxyethylthiamine disphosphate. Method Enzymol. 1966;9:65–68.
4. Frey PA. Chemical intermediates in catalysis by thiamine diphosphate. In: Jordan J, Patel M, Jordan F, editors. Thiamine: Catalytic Mechanisms in Normal and Disease States. Marcel Dekker; New York: 2003. pp. 1–13.
5. Hager LP. Ph D dissertation. University of Illinois; 1953. The enzymatic steps in α-keto acid oxidations.
6. Frey PA. 2-Acetylthiamin pyrophosphate: an enzyme-bound intermediate in thiamin pyrophosphate-dependent reactions. Biofactors. 1989;2:1–9. [PubMed]
7. Tittmann K, Wille G, Golbik R, Weidner A, Ghisla S, Hubner G. Radical phosphate transfer mechanism for the thiamin diphosphate- and FAD-dependent pyruvate oxidase from Lactobacillus plantarum. Kinetic coupling of intercofactor electron transfer with phosphate transfer to acetyl-thiamin diphosphate via a transient FAD semiquinone/hydroxyethyl-ThDP radical pair. Biochemistry. 2005;44:13291–11303. [PubMed]
8. Frey PA. Coenzymes and radicals. Science. 2001;294:2489–2490. [PubMed]
9. Nakanishi I, Itoh S, Suenobu T, Fukuzumi S. Electron transfer properties of active aldehydes derived from thiamin coenzyme analogues. Chem Commun. 1997:1927–1928.
10. Cammack R, Kerscher L, Oesterhelt D. A stable free radical intermediate in the reaction of 2-oxoacid:ferredoxin oxidoreductases of Halobacterium halobium. FEBS Lett. 1980;118:271–273.
11. Pieulle L, Guigliarelli B, Asso M, Dole F, Bernadac A, Hatchikian EC. Isolation and characterization of the pyruvate-ferredoxin oxidoreductase from the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio africanus. BIochem Biophys Acta. 1995;1250:49–59. [PubMed]
12. Menon S, Ragsdale SW. Mechanism of the Clostridium thermoaceticum pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase: evidence for the common catalytic intermediacy of the hydroxyethylthiamine pyrophosphate radical. Biochemistry. 1997;36:8484–8494. [PubMed]
13. Wertz JE, Bolton JR. Electron Spin Resonance. Chapman and Hall; New York: 1986.
14. Frank RAW, Kay CWM, Hirst J, Louisi BF. Off-pathway, oxygen-dependent thaimine radical in the Krebs cycle. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130 [PubMed]
15. Jordan F. Interplay of organic and biological chemistry in understanding coenzyme mechanisms: example of thiamin diphosphate-dependent decarboxylation of 2-oxo acids. FEBS Lett. 1999;457:298–301. [PubMed]
16. Ragsdale SW. Pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase and its radical intermediate. Chem Rev. 2003;103:2333–2346. [PubMed]
17. Tittmann K. Reaction mechanisms of thiamin diphosphate enzymes: redox reactions. FEBS J. 2009;276:2454–2468. [PubMed]
18. Chabriere E, Cavazza C, Contreras-Martel C, Fontecilla-Camps JC. Handbook of Metalloproteins. John Wiley & Sons; 2007. Pyruvate-ferredoxin oxidoreductase.
19. Charon MH, Volbeda A, Chabriere E, Pieulle L, Fontecilla-Camps JC. Structure and electron transfer mechanisms of pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1999;9:663–669. [PubMed]
20. Horner D, Hirt R, Embley T. A single eubacterial origin of eukaryotic pyruvate: ferredoxin oxidoreductase genes: implications for the evolution of anaerobic eukaryotes. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:1280–1291. [PubMed]
21. Raeburn SRJC. Pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase II. Characteristics of the forward and reverse reactions and properties of the enzyme. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1971;146:21–33. [PubMed]
22. Furdui C, Ragsdale SW. The role of pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase in pyruvate synthesis during autotrophic growth by the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:28494–28499. [PubMed]
23. Tersteegen A, Linder D, Thauer RK, Hedderich R. Structures and functions of four anabolic 2-oxoacid oxidoreductases in Methanobacterium thermoautotropphicum. Eur J Biochem. 1997;244:862–868. [PubMed]
24. Evans MCW, Buchanan BB, Arnon DI. A new ferredoxin-dependent carbon reduction cycle in a photosynthetic bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1966;55:928–934. [PubMed]
25. Ragsdale SW, Pierce E. Acetogenesis and the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway of CO2 fixation. Biochim Biophys Acta-Proteins and Proteomics. 2008;1784:1873–1898. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Upcroft P, Upcroft JA. Drug targets and mechanisms of resistance in the anaerboic protozoa. Clin Microb Rev. 2001;14:150–164. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Moreno SNJ, Mason RP, Docampo R. Distinct reduction of nitrofurans and metronidazole to free radical metabolites by Tritrichomonas foetus hydrogenosomal and cytosolic enzymes. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:8252–8259. [PubMed]
28. Kletzin A, Adams MW. Molecular and phylogenetic characterization of pyruvate and 2-ketoisovalerate ferredoxin oxidoreductases from Pyrococcus furiosus and pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase from Thermotoga maritima. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:248–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Blamey JM, Adams MW. Purification and characterization of pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993;1161:19–27. [PubMed]
30. Adams MW, Kletzin A. Oxidoreductase-type enzymes and redox proteins involved in fermentative metabolisms of hyperthermophilic archaea. Adv Protein Chem. 1996;48:101–180. [PubMed]
31. Kerscher L, Oesterhelt D. Ferredoxin is the coenzyme of alpha-ketoacid oxidoreductases in Halobacterium halobium. FEBS Lett. 1977;83:197–201. [PubMed]
32. Kerscher L, Nowitzke S, Oesterhelt D. Thermoacidophilic archaebacteria contain bacterial-type ferredoxins acting as electron acceptors of 2-oxoacid:ferredoxin oxidoreductases. Eur J Biochem. 1982;128:223–230. [PubMed]
33. Moser CC, Keske JM, Warncke K, Farid RS, Dutton PL. Nature of biological electron transfer. Nature. 1992;355:796–802. [PubMed]
34. Astashkin A, Seravalli J, Mansoorabadi SO, Reed GH, Ragsdale SW. Pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance experiments identify the paramagnetic intermediates in the pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase catalytic cycle. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:3888–3889. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Davidson VL. Chemically gated electron transfer. A means of accelerating and regulating rates of biological electron transfer. Biochemistry. 2002;41:14633–14636. [PubMed]
36. Furdui C, Ragsdale SW. The roles of coenzyme A in the pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase reaction mechanism: rate enhancement of electron transfer from a radical intermediate to an iron-sulfur cluster. Biochemistry. 2002;41:9921–9937. [PubMed]
37. Wille G, Meyer D, Steinmetz A, Hinze E, Golbik R, Tittmann K. The catalytic cycle of a thiamin diphosphate enzyme examined by cryocrystallography. Nat Chem Biol. 2006;2:324–328. [PubMed]
38. Chabriere E, Charon MH, Volbeda A, Pieulle L, Fontecilla-Camps JC. Crystal structures of the key anaerobic enzyme pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase, free and in complex with pyruvate. Nat Struct Biol. 1999;6:182–190. [PubMed]
39. Chabriere E, Vernede X, Guigliarelli B, Charon MH, Hatchikian EC, Fontecilla-Camps JC. Crystal structure of the free radical intermediate of pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase. Science. 2001;294:2559–2563. [PubMed]
40. Cavazza C, Contreras-Martel C, Pieulle L, Chabriere E, Hatchikian EC, Fontecilla-Camps JC. Flexibility of thiamine diphosphate revealed by kinetic crystallographic studies of the reaction of pyruvate-ferredoxin oxidoreductase with pyruvate. Structure. 2006;14:217–224. [PubMed]
41. Amara P, Galvan IF, Fontecilla-Camps JC, Field MJ. The enamine intermediate may not be universal to thiamine catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:9019–9022. [PubMed]
42. Ioffe A, Shaik S. Ethane cation-radical isomers and their interconversion pathways. Electron shift isomerism in cation radicals. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans. 1993;2:1461–1473.
43. Schreiner PR, Chernish LV, Gunchenko PA, Tikhonchuk EY, Hausmann H, Serafin M, Schlecht S, Dahl JEP, Carlson RMK, Fokin AA. Overcoming lability of extremely long alkane carbon-carbon bonds through dispersion forces. Nature. 2011;477:308–311. [PubMed]
44. Zavitsas AA. The relation between bond lengths and dissociation energies of carbon–carbon bonds. J Phys Chem A. 2003;107:897–898.
45. Bellvile DJ, Pabon RA, Bauld NL. Long bonds in cation radicals of vicinally difunctional molecules. J Am Chem Soc. 1985;107:4978–4979.
46. Huang MB, Lunell S. Equilibrium structure and hyperfine parameters of the ethane cation. Chem Phys. 1990;147:85–90.
47. Kauppinen JK, Moffatt DJ, Mantsch HH, Cameron DG. Fourier self-deconvolution: A method for resolving intrinsically overlapped bands. Appl Spectrosc. 1981;35:271–276.
48. Mansoorabadi SO, Seravalli J, Furdui C, Gerfen KVGJ, Begley TP, Melnick J, Ragsdale SW, Reed GH. EPR spectroscopic and computational characterization of the hydroxyethylidene-thiamine pyrophosphate radical intermediate of pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase. Biochemistry. 2006;45:7122–7131. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino JZ, Sonnenberg GJL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery J, Peralta JAJE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam NJ, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ. Gaussian 09. Gaussian, Inc; Wallingford, CT: 2009.
50. Moser CC, Page CC, Farid R, Dutton PL. Biological electron transfer. Bioenergetics and Biomembranes. 1995;27:389–393. [PubMed]
51. Gruys KJ, Halkides CJ, Frey PA. Synthesis and properties of 2-acetylthiamin pyrophosphate: An enzymatic reaction intermediate. Biochemistry. 1987;26:7575–7585. [PubMed]
52. Madej E, Wardman P. The oxidizing power of the glutathione thiyl radical as measured by its electrode potential at physiological pH. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007;462:94–102. [PubMed]
53. Ollagnier-de Choudens S, Sanakis Y, Hewitson KS, Roach P, Baldwin JE, Munck E, Fontecave M. Iron-sulfur center of biotin syhthase and lipoate synthase. Biochemistry. 2000;39:4165–4173. [PubMed]
54. Hadad CM, Rablen PR, Wiberg KB. C–O and C–S bonds: Stability, bond dissociation energies, and resonance stabilization. J Org Chem. 1998;63:8668–8681.
55. van der Giezen M, Tovar J, Clark CG. Mitochondrion-derived ogranelles in protists and fungi. Int Rev Cytol. 2005;244:175–225. [PubMed]
56. Peck HD. In: The sulfate reducing Bacteria: Contemporary perspectives. Odom JM, Singleton R Jr, editors. Springer; Berlin: 1993.
57. Menon S, Ragsdale SW. Unleashing hydrogenase activity in carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase and pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase. Biocehmistry. 1996;35:15814–15821. [PubMed]
58. Cammack R, Patil DS, Fernandez VM. Electron-spin-resonance/electron-paramagnetic-resonance spectroscopy of iron-sulphur enzymes. Biochem Soc Trans. 1985;13:572–578. [PubMed]
59. Pierce E, Becker DF, Ragsdale SW. Identification and characterization of oxalate oxidoreductase, a novel thiamine pyrophosphate-dependent 2-oxoacid oxidoreductase that enables anaerobic growth on oxalate. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:40515–40524. [PubMed]
60. Seifritz C, Frostl JM, Drake HL, Daniel SL. Influence of nitrate on oxalate- and glyoxylate-dependent growth and acetogenesis by Moorella thermoacetica. Arch Microbiol. 2002;178:457–464. [PubMed]
61. Bock AK, Schonheit P, Teixeira M. The iron-sulfur centers of the pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase from Methanosarcina barkeri (Fusaro) FEBS Lett. 1997;414:209–212. [PubMed]
62. Fluekiger P, Luethi HP, Portmann S, Weber J. MOLEKEL. Swiss National Supercomputing Centre; Manno, Switzerland: 2002.