PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jcoHomeThis ArticleSearchSubmitASCO JCO Homepage
 
J Clin Oncol. Sep 20, 2012; 30(27): 3345–3352.
Published online Aug 13, 2012. doi:  10.1200/JCO.2011.40.8120
PMCID: PMC3438232
Tissue Platinum Concentration and Tumor Response in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Eric S. Kim, J. Jack Lee, Guangan He, Chi-Wan Chow, Junya Fujimoto, Neda Kalhor, Stephen G. Swisher, Ignacio I. Wistuba, David J. Stewart, and Zahid H. Siddik
All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Corresponding author: Eric S. Kim, MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 463, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: esy_kim/at/yahoo.com.
Received November 26, 2011; Accepted June 19, 2012.
Purpose
Platinum resistance is a major limitation in the treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Reduced intracellular drug accumulation is one of the most consistently identified features of platinum-resistant cell lines, but clinical data are limited. We assessed the effects of tissue platinum concentrations on response and survival in NSCLC.
Patients and Methods
We measured total platinum concentrations by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry in 44 archived fresh-frozen NSCLC specimens from patients who underwent surgical resection after neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Tissue platinum concentration was correlated with percent reduction in tumor size on post- versus prechemotherapy computed tomography scans. The relationship between tissue platinum concentration and survival was assessed by univariate and multicovariate Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Results
Tissue platinum concentration correlated significantly with percent reduction in tumor size (P < .001). The same correlations were seen with cisplatin, carboplatin, and all histology subgroups. Furthermore, there was no significant impact of potential variables such as number of cycles and time lapse from last chemotherapy on platinum concentration. Patients with higher platinum concentration had longer time to recurrence (P = .034), progression-free survival (P = .018), and overall survival (P = .005) in the multicovariate Cox model analysis after adjusting for number of cycles.
Conclusion
This clinical study established a relationship between tissue platinum concentration and response in NSCLC. It suggests that reduced platinum accumulation might be an important mechanism of platinum resistance in the clinical setting. Further studies investigating factors that modulate intracellular platinum concentration are warranted.
Platinum-based chemotherapy is widely used in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For their mechanism of action, platinum drugs must form DNA adducts, which induce a cascade of signaling transduction pathways that culminate in activating p53-dependent and p53-independent apoptosis.1 However, first-line platinum-containing doublets yield response rates in NSCLC of only 20% to 30%,2,3 because a significant portion of tumors express intrinsic or de novo resistance. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms of intrinsic platinum resistance is necessary to develop new therapeutic approaches that induce greater platinum sensitivity and more durable responses.
There are several mechanisms by which NSCLC cells may express intrinsic resistance to platinum, such as, but not limited to, drug inactivation by detoxifying factors, alterations in checkpoint and apoptotic proteins, and alteration in intracellular drug accumulation.4 Despite the multifactorial nature of platinum resistance, reduced intracellular drug accumulation is one of the most consistently identified features of cisplatin-resistant cell lines,5,6 including resistant NSCLC cell lines.711
Studies in cell lines have enhanced our understanding of platinum resistance, but there are several limitations. For instance, each cell line represents a single phenotype, making it difficult to assess its clinical relevance. Also, cell line studies do not take into account tumor cell interactions with host factors that may constitute a unique microenvironment, and this limits the applicability of cell line data to biologically complex human tumors. Therefore, a tissue-based model is needed to study platinum resistance that could be used to validate data from cell line studies and to identify specific impediments that correlate directly with clinical response.
In previous studies, total platinum and DNA adducts were detectable in autopsy tumor samples from patients who had last received cisplatin 6 to 15 months antemortem.12,13 Because this suggests that platinum has a long half-life in tumors, we measured platinum concentrations in surgical NSCLC specimens from patients who had received neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy to assess whether tumor platinum concentration correlated with outcome and to validate reduced platinum accumulation as a mechanism of clinical platinum resistance in NSCLC. To our knowledge, no clinical studies in any tumor type have examined the relationship between platinum concentration and clinical outcome. We hypothesized that total platinum concentrations in NSCLC specimens after neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy would correlate with tumor response.
Patients and Tissue Specimens
This study (approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center) used University of Texas Lung Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence Tissue Bank archived fresh-frozen NSCLC tumor specimens. Tumors examined were obtained from 44 patients with stage I to III NSCLC who had received neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy without radiation followed by curative surgical resection between 2001 and 2009 at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. This represented all patients with NSCLC undergoing curative surgical resection (without radiation) during that time period who had undergone neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy and for whom sufficient archival fresh-frozen tumor tissue was available to permit platinum measurement. An additional four patients who underwent surgery alone and one patient who received pemetrexed without a platinum agent as neoadjuvant chemotherapy provided a control group. Various histopathologic features, including percentage of residual viable tumor cells, necrosis, and fibrosis, were assessed in all tumor samples as described previously.14
Tissue Platinum Measurement
Approximately 30 mg of tumor from each patient was weighed and digested overnight in benzethonium hydroxide at 55°C to achieve homogeneity.15,16 After acidification, each sample was analyzed by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS) to measure absorbance unit associated with platinum content, as previously described.15 Validity of the assay was ensured with a linear standard curve (Appendix Fig A1, online only) that was generated from serial dilutions of certified stock platinum standard (987 μg/mL; Sigma, St Louis, MO). Most specimens were analyzed in at least two independent experiments where samples were taken from different parts of the tumor. The averaged platinum concentration was reported as absorbance unit per milligram of tissue.
Statistical Analysis
The primary outcome was tumor response, determined by measuring percent reduction in the largest tumor diameter from pre- to postchemotherapy computed tomography scans, blinded to the results from platinum analysis. In addition, we determined tumor response using the standard RECIST classification.17 Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess correlations between tissue platinum concentration and variables of interest, including percent reduction in tumor size. Two-sided P < .05 was considered statistically significant. The t test was used to compare platinum concentrations between two groups. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to evaluate differences in time to recurrence (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between two risk groups dichotomized by median platinum concentration. Recurrence was defined as evidence of local recurrence or new sites of involvement in lymph nodes or distant organs after curative resection. PFS was defined as the time from date of surgery until recurrence or last follow-up or death from any cause. OS was defined as the time from date of surgery until death from any cause or last follow-up. Four patients who died without any information on the status of recurrence were excluded from TTR analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using univariate and multicovariate Cox proportional hazards regression models to assess for the association between platinum concentration and clinical parameters including TTR, PFS, and OS. In addition, odds ratio for response by covariates according to RECIST was calculated using logistic regression analysis. Multicovariate analysis was used to include variables with P < .20 for any of the three time-to-event end points in the univariate analysis as the entry criterion. However, only the variables that were significant in any of the end points were retained in the final model. The statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad PRISM (version 5.04; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) and R (version 2.13.1; http://www.r-project.org/) software.
Patient Characteristics
Table 1 lists the patient characteristics of 44 evaluable patients with early-stage NSCLC who received neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy before undergoing surgical resection. Median age was 64 years; 55% of patients were men, and 45% were women. A majority of patients had either stage IIB (30%) or IIIA (45%) disease. All 44 patients received a doublet consisting of cisplatin (n = 16), carboplatin (n = 27), or cisplatin followed by carboplatin (n = 1). Most patients received taxanes as the second agent. Median time from last dose of chemotherapy to surgery was 37 days. There were 24 adenocarcinomas (55%), 12 squamous cell carcinomas (27%), and eight other histology types (18%).
Table 1.
Table 1.
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Evaluable Patients
Tissue Platinum Concentration and Tumor Response
By FAAS, absorbance values from tissues of our five controls who had not received a platinum were similar to the background value obtained with hydrochloric acid (Appendix Table A1, online only). As illustrated in Figure 1A, all except two platinum-treated patients had at least some degree of tumor shrinkage with therapy, and there was a significant correlation (Pearson r = 0.69, P < .001) between tumor platinum concentration and percent change in tumor size. Furthermore, as demonstrated in Figure 1B, patients who achieved a partial response had a significantly higher platinum concentration compared with patients who had stable disease (P < .001). Separate analyses were also performed for each of the following subgroups: patients treated with cisplatin, patients treated with carboplatin, patients with adenocarcinomas, and patients with squamous cell carcinomas; tumor shrinkage correlated significantly with tumor platinum concentration for each subgroup (Figs 1C and and1D).1D). The correlation between tissue platinum concentration and tumor response in eight specimens from the other histology subgroup was also statistically significant (Table 2; not shown in Fig 1). The same analyses using Spearman correlation coefficients (data not shown) also revealed significant correlations between platinum concentration and tumor response with the exception of the squamous cell carcinoma subgroup, which demonstrated a borderline significance (Spearman ρ = 0.511, P = .090) possibly because of a small sample size.
Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Pearson's correlation between tissue platinum concentration and tumor response. (A) A highly significant correlation was observed between total tissue platinum concentration and percent reduction in tumor size. (B) In addition, a significantly higher (more ...)
Table 2.
Table 2.
Association Between Tissue Platinum Concentration and Various Clinicopathologic Parameters
Association Between Platinum Concentrations and Clinicopathologic Parameters
In addition to establishing the correlation between tissue platinum concentration and percent reduction in tumor size, we determined the association between platinum concentration and other variables (Table 2). No single parameter beside percent reduction in tumor size correlated significantly (P < .05) with platinum concentration in our group of 44 patients. Notably, hemoglobin level and percent viable tumor demonstrated an association with platinum concentration at borderline significance. Hemoglobin levels in patients who received carboplatin but not cisplatin correlated significantly with platinum concentration (Table 2). There were three specimens with sarcomatoid features on pathology that seemed to be outliers for the correlation between platinum concentration and percent viable tumor. These three specimens demonstrated 80% viable tumor despite radiologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (data not shown). The correlation between platinum concentration and percent viable tumor became significant (P = .014) after removing these three specimens.
Effects of Different Platinum Compounds and Number of Cycles on Platinum Concentration
Tumor platinum concentrations were similar between cisplatin and carboplatin subgroups (Fig 2A). Furthermore, there was no significant impact of number of cycles (≥ v < three cycles) on platinum concentration in the overall population (Fig 2B) or within cisplatin or carboplatin subgroups (Figs 2C and and22D).
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Effects of different platinum compounds and number of cycles on tissue platinum concentration. There was no significant difference in mean platinum concentration (A) between cisplatin and carboplatin subgroups or (B) between patients who received ≥ (more ...)
Effects of Tissue Platinum Concentration on Recurrence and Survival
The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the effect of high versus low platinum concentration, dichotomized by the median, on TTR, PFS, and OS. The univariate analysis showed that high platinum concentration was a protective factor for TTR (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.97; P = .043), PFS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.96; P = .038), and OS (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.95; P = .038; Table 3). In addition to the platinum concentration, percent reduction in tumor size (P = .16) and number of cycles (P = .022) demonstrated some association (P < .20) with OS and were included in multicovariate analysis initially. High platinum concentration remained a significant protective factor for TTR (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.93; P = .034), PFS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.85; P = .018), and OS (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.67; P = .005) after multicovariate analysis (Table 3). Number of cycles (≥ v < three cycles) was also significantly associated with OS (P = .003) but not with TTR (P = .35) or PFS (P = .071). Percent reduction in tumor size was no longer significant in any of the end points and, hence, was dropped in the final multicovariate models. We also performed logistic regression analysis to determine the association between platinum concentration and response by RECIST. Patients with high platinum concentration were more likely to achieve a partial response compared with patients with low platinum concentration (odds ratio, 7.07; 95% CI, 1.51 to 33.09; P = .013) after adjusting for number of cycles. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests comparing high versus low platinum concentrations for TTR, PFS, and OS are shown in Figures 3A, A,3B,3B, and and3C,3C, respectively, with Figure 3D reinforcing the observation that the difference in tumor response between high versus low tissue platinum groups is significant (P < .001). Furthermore, in the high platinum group, 11 patients (50%) achieved a partial response compared with three patients (14%) in the low platinum group (Fig 3D).
Table 3.
Table 3.
Logistic Regression Analysis for Tumor Response and Univariate and Multicovariate Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Analysis for Prediction of TTR, PFS, and OS After Surgical Resection (N = 44)
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) time to recurrence, (B) progression-free survival (PFS), and (C) overall survival (OS) of patients with high versus low tissue platinum concentrations after neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. (D) A significant difference (more ...)
We report herein the proof-of-principle demonstration that tissue platinum level can be reliably measured using FAAS in resected NSCLC specimens from patients who received neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Furthermore, using this approach, we report the novel findings that tissue platinum concentration is significantly associated with tumor response and survival in NSCLC, supporting reduced drug accumulation as a significant mechanism of platinum resistance in clinical tumor specimens.
Tumor platinum concentrations were similar in patients treated with carboplatin versus cisplatin despite platinum doses being considerably higher with carboplatin. This is in keeping with cellular uptake being slower for carboplatin than for cisplatin.18 The weak correlation between time from last treatment and platinum concentration is in keeping with the long half-life previously noted for platinum in human tissues,13 including dorsal root ganglion,19 liver,20 and kidney cortex,21 and in earlier studies of human tumor platinum concentrations.22,23
The weak correlation between the number of cycles of platinum therapy and tumor platinum concentrations is similar to previous observations with respect to human autopsy kidney cortex platinum concentrations after cisplatin, where tissue concentrations varied with dose given in the first cycle but correlated only weakly with cumulative dose.20,21 This suggests that for kidney and tumor, there may be adaptive response/resistance-inducing transport factors that limit further net platinum accumulation after initial exposure. In this regard, uptake transporters, such as the copper transporters CTR1 and CTR2, and various efflux transporters, such as the multidrug resistance protein (MRP), ABCB1, and ATP7B, are potential contributors.4 Interestingly, more is known about the function of efflux transporters than uptake transporters. MRP expression is associated with decreased cellular drug accumulation of cisplatin.24 In autopsy NSCLC tumor tissues, mRNA expression levels of MRP325 and MRP526 were significantly higher in patients who were exposed to platinum drugs compared with patients who had not received platinum drugs. However, it is not certain whether tumor MRP expression correlates with clinical outcome in NSCLC.4 Conversely, the role of ABCB1 in transport of platinum drugs seems to be less significant, because its expression in NSCLC cell lines did not correlate significantly with sensitivity to cisplatin or intracellular platinum accumulation.9,27 Likewise, in NSCLC tissues, ABCB1 expression by immunohistochemistry did not correlate with response to cisplatin.2830 The copper transporter ATP7B is also thought to play a role in efflux of platinum drugs. Human tumor cells transfected with ATP7B acquired significant resistance to cisplatin, mainly as a result of increased cisplatin efflux.31 Furthermore, ATP7B mRNA and immunohistochemistry expression significantly correlated with cisplatin resistance in NSCLC xenografts.32 However, in clinical NSCLC specimens, only the copper uptake transporter CTR1, but not ATP7A or ATP7B, predicted clinical outcome after platinum-based chemotherapy.33 In addition, the observation that NSCLC dose-response curves flatten at higher platinum dose-intensities34 would be more in keeping with resistance being related to reduced uptake rather than increased efflux.35 Validating functions of transport factors in NSCLC and incorporating them as biomarkers for platinum sensitivity into future clinical trials would be of significant clinical value. Furthermore, designing a novel platinum complex that is not subject to reduced platinum accumulation in resistant cells could be another potential strategy to overcome platinum resistance.
There are factors other than transporters that may modulate intratumoral platinum concentration. A low extracellular pH favors uptake of weak acids such as aquated cisplatin and enhances cytotoxicity.36 Serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase, which converts pyruvate to lactate in tumors,37 did not correlate with tissue platinum concentration. Contrary to the potential importance of low pH on platinum uptake, we observed a positive correlation between hemoglobin level and tumor platinum concentration, despite the fact that higher hemoglobin level would have been expected to be associated with higher tissue pH. Because pretreatment hemoglobin level was used for correlation, chemotherapy-induced anemia does not explain this observation. It is possible that anemia contributes to tumor hypoxia affecting drug delivery of platinum agents. This would be consistent with a previous report in which prevention of anemia using darbepoetin alfa (an erythropoiesis-stimulating protein) resulted in reduced tumor hypoxia, higher intracellular platinum concentration, and greater tumor response in a murine model of Lewis lung carcinoma.38
ERCC1 may also play a role in modulating intratumoral platinum concentration. Platinum-DNA adducts can be removed by the nucleotide excision repair pathway in which ERCC1 plays an important role.39,40 It is unclear what happens once adducts get removed from DNA by nucleotide excision repair, but they could potentially leave the cell, thereby contributing to reduced intracellular platinum concentration. Against ERCC1 being the major factor driving tumor platinum concentrations is the weak correlation with cumulative drug dose. If an active resistance factor such as ERCC1 (or an efflux pump) were responsible, one might expect little drug accumulation at lower drug doses and then a relatively steep increase in drug concentration with increasing dose as one saturated the capacity of the resistance-inducing factor at higher doses.35
Our sample size was relatively small because only a small proportion of all patients with NSCLC are candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and because we were limited by the availability of sufficient quantities of archived fresh-frozen tumor to permit analysis in this study. Despite these small patient numbers, we achieved adequate statistical power to establish a correlation between tumor platinum concentration and therapeutic efficacy that has proven our hypothesis to be correct. Nevertheless, it is still appropriate to stress that this is a single-institution, retrospective study that, therefore, will require independent validation with a larger number of patients.
Once platinum gets into tumor cells and accumulates to adequate levels, platinum-DNA adducts are generated.1 We attempted to measure DNA adduct levels in our specimens, but the analytic sensitivity proved limiting, and it was impractical to increase the amount of tissue for extracting an adequate amount of DNA for reliable detection of adducts by FAAS. Furthermore, there is ample evidence that the amount of adduct formation is significantly associated with intracellular platinum accumulation.41 However, we believe that total intratumoral platinum concentration is still the most accurate variable that can be used to validate reduced drug accumulation as a significant mechanism of platinum resistance.
Another limitation of our study is the potential influence of second agents (mostly taxanes) that were given concurrently with platinum agents. The factors that confer resistance to one agent may render tumors resistant to several other agents.4 Alternating multiple agents with different mechanisms of action, including cisplatin and paclitaxel, does not improve clinical outcome in NSCLC.42 However, there were a few outlying patients in our study whose tumors demonstrated clinically significant shrinkage despite low detectable levels of intratumoral platinum (Fig 1A). This shrinkage may have been a result of the concurrent taxane, although this remains uncertain. Additionally, number of cycles was associated with OS. However, the clinical significance of number of cycles cannot be definitely answered using our data.
In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating impact of tissue platinum concentration on NSCLC response, recurrence, and survival. Our data strongly support reduced drug accumulation as a significant mechanism of platinum resistance. Because transport-related mechanisms of resistance are likely to persist or are acquired after platinum treatment in a variety of cancer tissue types,1,4 we anticipate that our novel approach of measuring platinum concentration in resected specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy by FAAS could potentially be used to investigate the relationship between intratumoral platinum concentration and tumor response in the metastatic setting or in other tumor types, such as advanced ovarian carcinoma, in which neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy could be considered before debulking surgery.43 Finally, enhanced understanding of the molecular mechanism of platinum accumulation by tumor cells will be necessary to identify surrogate biomarkers for platinum accumulation that could be developed prospectively for individualizing therapy.
Acknowledgment
We thank Waun Ki Hong, MD, for support with our project.
Appendix
Fig A1.
Fig A1.
A standard curve generated from a serial dilution of certified stock platinum standard using flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Absorbance unit was directly proportional to platinum concentration.
Table A1.
Absorbance Values From Five Negative Controls
Negative ControlWeight (mg)Absorbance Unit
0.1 N hydrochloric acid0.01-0.02
Surgery-only control 1300.0121
Surgery-only control 2310.0233
Surgery-only control 3320.0181
Surgery-only control 4290.0231
Neoadjuvant pemetrexed300.0136
NOTE. As negative controls for the assay, four specimens from patients who underwent upfront surgery and one specimen from a patient who received only pemetrexed as neoadjuvant chemotherapy were used. Absorbance values from the five negative controls were similar to the value obtained from hydrochloric acid which represents background reading for flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
Footnotes
Supported by National Foundation of Cancer Research Grant No. 90088436; Department of Defense Grant No. W81XWH-07-1-0306; National Institutes of Health Grants No. CA127263, CA160687, and CA16672; Specialized Program of Research Excellence in Lung Cancer Grant No. P50CA70907.
Presented in part at the 14th World Conference on Lung Cancer, July 3-7, 2011, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conception and design: Eric S. Kim, J. Jack Lee, Ignacio I. Wistuba, David J. Stewart, Zahid H. Siddik
Provision of study materials or patients: Chi-Wan Chow, Stephen G. Swisher, Ignacio I. Wistuba
Collection and assembly of data: Eric S. Kim, Chi-Wan Chow, Junya Fujimoto, Neda Kalhor, Stephen G. Swisher, Ignacio I. Wistuba, Zahid H. Siddik
Data analysis and interpretation: Eric S. Kim, J. Jack Lee, Guangan He, David J. Stewart, Zahid H. Siddik
Manuscript writing: All authors
Final approval of manuscript: All authors
1. Siddik ZH. Cisplatin: Mode of cytotoxic action and molecular basis of resistance. Oncogene. 2003;22:7265–7279. [PubMed]
2. Hoang T, Xu R, Schiller JH, et al. Clinical model to predict survival in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with third-generation chemotherapy regimens based on eastern cooperative oncology group data. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:175–183. [PubMed]
3. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:92–98. [PubMed]
4. Stewart DJ. Tumor and host factors that may limit efficacy of chemotherapy in non-small cell and small cell lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010;75:173–234. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Gately DP, Howell SB. Cellular accumulation of the anticancer agent cisplatin: A review. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:1171–1176. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Andrews PA, Howell SB. Cellular pharmacology of cisplatin: Perspectives on mechanisms of acquired resistance. Cancer Cells. 1990;2:35–43. [PubMed]
7. Shellard SA, Fichtinger-Schepman AM, Lazo JS, et al. Evidence of differential cisplatin-DNA adduct formation, removal and tolerance of DNA damage in three human lung carcinoma cell lines. Anticancer Drugs. 1993;4:491–500. [PubMed]
8. Shimura M, Saito A, Matsuyama S, et al. Element array by scanning X-ray fluorescence microscopy after cis-diamminedichloro-platinum(II) treatment. Cancer Res. 2005;65:4998–5002. [PubMed]
9. Kawai H, Kiura K, Tabata M, et al. Characterization of non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines established before and after chemotherapy. Lung Cancer. 2002;35:305–314. [PubMed]
10. Matsumura T, Takigawa N, Kiura K, et al. Determinants of cisplatin and irinotecan activities in human lung adenocarcinoma cells: Evidence of cisplatin accumulation and topoisomerase I activity. In Vivo. 2005;19:717–721. [PubMed]
11. Bungo M, Fujiwara Y, Kasahara K, et al. Decreased accumulation as a mechanism of resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) in human non-small cell lung cancer cell lines: Relation to DNA damage and repair. Cancer Res. 1990;50:2549–2553. [PubMed]
12. Poirier MC, Reed E, Litterst CL, et al. Persistence of platinum-ammine-DNA adducts in gonads and kidneys of rats and multiple tissues from cancer patients. Cancer Res. 1992;52:149–153. [PubMed]
13. Stewart DJ, Benjamin RS, Luna M, et al. Human tissue distribution of platinum after cis-diamminedichloroplatinum. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1982;10:51–54. [PubMed]
14. Pataer A, Kalhor N, Correa AM, et al. Histopathologic response criteria predict survival of patients with resected lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:825–832. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Siddik ZH, Boxall FE, Harrap KR. Flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometric determination of platinum in tissues solubilized in hyamine hydroxide. Anal Biochem. 1987;163:21–26. [PubMed]
16. Verschraegen CF, Kumagai S, Davidson R, et al. Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of intraperitoneal cis-bis-neodecanoato(trans-R, R-1, 2-diaminocyclohexane)-platinum II entrapped in multilamellar liposome vesicles. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2003;129:549–555. [PubMed]
17. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–247. [PubMed]
18. Los G, Verdegaal E, Noteborn HP, et al. Cellular pharmacokinetics of carboplatin and cisplatin in relation to their cytotoxic action. Biochem Pharmacol. 1991;42:357–363. [PubMed]
19. Gregg RW, Molepo JM, Monpetit VJ, et al. Cisplatin neurotoxicity: The relationship between dosage, time, and platinum concentration in neurologic tissues, and morphologic evidence of toxicity. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:795–803. [PubMed]
20. Stewart DJ, Dulberg C, Molepo JM, et al. Factors affecting human autopsy kidney-cortex and kidney-medulla platinum concentrations after cisplatin administration. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;34:14–22. [PubMed]
21. Stewart DJ, Mikhael NZ, Nanji AA, et al. Renal and hepatic concentrations of platinum: Relationship to cisplatin time, dose, and nephrotoxicity. J Clin Oncol. 1985;3:1251–1256. [PubMed]
22. Stewart DJ, Molepo JM, Green RM, et al. Factors affecting platinum concentrations in human surgical tumour specimens after cisplatin. Br J Cancer. 1995;71:598–604. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Stewart DJ, Mikhael NZ, Nair RC, et al. Platinum concentrations in human autopsy tumor samples. Am J Clin Oncol. 1988;11:152–158. [PubMed]
24. Henness S, Davey MW, Harvie RM, et al. Fractionated irradiation of H69 small-cell lung cancer cells causes stable radiation and drug resistance with increased MRP1, MRP2, and topoisomerase IIalpha expression. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:895–902. [PubMed]
25. Oguri T, Isobe T, Fujitaka K, et al. Association between expression of the MRP3 gene and exposure to platinum drugs in lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2001;93:584–589. [PubMed]
26. Oguri T, Isobe T, Suzuki T, et al. Increased expression of the MRP5 gene is associated with exposure to platinum drugs in lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2000;86:95–100. [PubMed]
27. Ikuta K, Takemura K, Sasaki K, et al. Expression of multidrug resistance proteins and accumulation of cisplatin in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 2005;28:707–712. [PubMed]
28. Yoh K, Ishii G, Yokose T, et al. Breast cancer resistance protein impacts clinical outcome in platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:1691–1697. [PubMed]
29. Kawasaki M, Nakanishi Y, Kuwano K, et al. Immunohistochemically detected p53 and P-glycoprotein predict the response to chemotherapy in lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:1352–1357. [PubMed]
30. Miyatake K, Gemba K, Ueoka H, et al. Prognostic significance of mutant p53 protein, P-glycoprotein and glutathione S-transferase-pi in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:2829–2836. [PubMed]
31. Komatsu M, Sumizawa T, Mutoh M, et al. Copper-transporting P-type adenosine triphosphatase (ATP7B) is associated with cisplatin resistance. Cancer Res. 2000;60:1312–1316. [PubMed]
32. Nakagawa T, Inoue Y, Kodama H, et al. Expression of copper-transporting P-type adenosine triphosphatase (ATP7B) correlates with cisplatin resistance in human non-small cell lung cancer xenografts. Oncol Rep. 2008;20:265–270. [PubMed]
33. Chen HH, Yan JJ, Chen WC, et al. Predictive and prognostic value of human copper transporter 1 (hCtr1) in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Lung Cancer. 2012;75:228–234. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Stewart DJ, Chiritescu G, Dahrouge S, et al. Chemotherapy dose-response relationships in non-small cell lung cancer and implied resistance mechanisms. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007;33:101–137. [PubMed]
35. Stewart DJ, Raaphorst GP, Yau J, et al. Active vs. passive resistance, dose-response relationships, high dose chemotherapy, and resistance modulation: A hypothesis. Invest New Drugs. 1996;14:115–130. [PubMed]
36. Laurencot CM, Kennedy KA. Influence of pH on the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in EMT6 mouse mammary tumor cells. Oncol Res. 1995;7:371–379. [PubMed]
37. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Sivridis E. Lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes 1 and 5: Differential expression by neoplastic and stromal cells in non-small cell lung cancer and other epithelial malignant tumors. Tumour Biol. 2003;24:199–202. [PubMed]
38. Shannon AM, Bouchier-Hayes DJ, Condron CM, et al. Correction of anaemia through the use of darbepoetin alfa improves chemotherapeutic outcome in a murine model of Lewis lung carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:224–232. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Reed E. Platinum-DNA adduct, nucleotide excision repair and platinum based anti-cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 1998;24:331–344. [PubMed]
40. Li Q, Yu JJ, Mu C, et al. Association between the level of ERCC-1 expression and the repair of cisplatin-induced DNA damage in human ovarian cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2000;20:645–652. [PubMed]
41. Yoshida M, Khokhar AR, Siddik ZH. Biochemical pharmacology of homologous alicyclic mixed amine platinum(II) complexes in sensitive and resistant tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 1994;54:3468–3473. [PubMed]
42. Stewart DJ, Tomiak E, Shamji FM, et al. Phase II study of alternating chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2004;44:241–249. [PubMed]
43. Vergote I, Trop é CG, Amant F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:943–953. [PubMed]
Articles from Journal of Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of
American Society of Clinical Oncology