PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced


 
Formats
Article sections
Authors
Related links
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Ann N Y Acad Sci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 9.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3437326
NIHMSID: NIHMS403867
Copyright notice and Disclaimer
Adenosine: a Prototherapeutic Concept in Neurodegeneration
DAG K. J. E. von LUBITZ,ac MARGARET F. CARTER,a MARK BEENHAKKER,a RICK C-S. LIN,b and KENNETH A. JACOBSONa
aLaboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry Molecular Recognition Section National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/NIH Bethesda, Maryland 20892
bDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics Hahnemann University Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102
cDvL is a Special Fellow of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Washington, DC, and of Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA.
Small right arrow pointing to: The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Ann N Y Acad Sci
Small right arrow pointing to: See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.
Ten years ago, Newby introduced a new description of adenosine: “the retaliatory metabolite.”1 The theoretical notion that adenosine may protect against tissue injury2 evolved rapidly into a practical demonstration of powerful neuroprotective effects of endogenous adenosine and its analogues.3–5 Subsequent improvement in understanding both the effects of adenosine receptor stimulation and the pathological processes that accompany numerous neurological disorders ultimately led to proposals that adenosine-based therapies may be effective not only in stroke and seizures, but also in Alzheimer's, Huntington's and Parkinson's diseases, and a number of psychiatric pathologies.5,6
Endogenous Brain Adenosine and Pathologic Stress
Technical difficulties complicate the exact measurement of extracellular brain adenosine concentration.4 Currently, the level of free adenosine level in the interstitial brain space of unanesthetized, freely moving animals is estimated at 50–300 nM.4 More importantly, however, several laboratories have consistently reported that the amount of extracellular adenosine increases dramatically following cerebral metabolic stress caused by seizures, hypoxia, or ischemia.4
In focal ischemia (and probably global as well), the reduction of cerebral blood flow (CBF) correlates with the concomitant elevation of both adenosine and glutamate.7 However, while increased release of adenosine occurs at CBF values of 25 ml/100 g/min, further reduction ofCBF (20 ml/100 g/min) is necessary to elevate concentration of the extracellular glutamate. Quite recently, Hoehn and White8,9 showed that release of excitatory amino acids elicited by electrical field stimulation also results in the release of adenosine—an effect mediated in part by both N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-proprionic acid (AMPA) receptors. It appears, therefore, that glutamate-mediated hyperexcitation of neurons (such as seen in cerebral ischemia) may provide an additional, and somewhat unexpected, stimulus for further increase in adenosine release. These observations indicate that, in view of the powerful inhibitory effect of adenosine on the release of several excitatory neurotransmitters (see below), it is quite likely that increase in the concentration of interstitial adenosine, which both precedes and accompanies massive intraischemic release of glutamate,10–13 constitutes part of a mechanism whose operation provides a transient, endogenous protection of the brain against injury.5
Cerebral Receptors of Adenosine
Endogenous adenosine acts at three principal G-protein-associated receptor subtypes: A1, A2 and A3.14,15 Both the molecular structure and the nature of the effector coupling are known for all three subtypes.16,17 Cerebral A1 receptors are linked to several second messenger systems, and one of their characteristic responses to stimulation is inhibition of adenylate cyclase.14 Activation of A2 receptors stimulates adenylate cyclase,14 whereas activation of A3 receptors inhibits it, and also stimulates phosphoinositide metabolism.18 Although their specific distribution varies,19 all three adenosine receptor subtypes are found in the brain.15,20 A1 receptors are predominantly found in the hippocampus, IV–VI laminas of the cortex, striatum, amygdala, and superior colliculus, and appear to be codistributed with NMDA receptors,21,22
A2 receptors, of which two subclasses (A2a and A2b) exist, abound on smooth muscle and endothelial cells of cerebral blood vessels, where they mediate vascular effects of adenosine.23 High-affinity A2a receptors are particularly well represented in the striatum and other dopamine-rich regions of the brain,19 where they are colocalized with dopamine D2 receptors, and exert profound modulatory effect on dopaminergic transmission.24 Adenosine receptors on glial cells helong, most likely, to the low-affinity A2b subclass.4 Cerebral distribution of A1 and A2 receptors follows an intriguing pattern, i.e., A2 appear to be less abundant within regions where the density of A1 sites is elevated, and vice versa. Differences in the anatomical distribution of A1 and A2 receptors may have striking behavioral consequences.25 A3 receptors are found throughout the brain but their density is much lower than that of either A1 or A2.20 The cell type on which they are located is unknown.
Physiological Effects of Adenosine Receptor Stimulation
The principal function of adenosine in the brain is that of an inhibitory neuromodulator,26,27 The inhibitory effects of adenosine are mediated mainly via both pre- and postsynaptic A1 receptors.
Activation of presynaptic A1 sites inhibits neuronal calcium uptake28-30 and results in reduced release of several neurotransmitters, e.g., acetylcholine, noradrenaline, dopamine, serotonin, and glutamate.31–34
Stimulation of both pre- and postsynaptic A1 receptors causes activation of potassium35–37 and chloride38 conductances. The resultant elevation of the membrane potential and the depression of the membrane resistance35,39 decrease neuronal excitability and firing rate.35,40,41
Apart from the involvement of adenosine A2 receptors in regulation of CBF23 adenosine A2 receptors are responsible for accumulation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in the brain.4 The details of A2 receptor involvement in neuronal physiology are still poorly understood, although existing evidence indicates that excitatory A2 receptors are present in the hippocampus42 and may be involved in potentiation of calcium-dependent neurotransmitter release43,44 and in modulation of electrically evoked release of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in globus pallidus.45 It is also known that in the striatum, A2 receptors mediate control of gene expression in enkephalinergic neurons,46 and that A2 activation attenuates activity of the colocalized dopamine D2 receptors through reduction of their affinity for D2 agonists.25,47,48 Finally, participation of A2 receptors in generation of astrocytic edema has been also suggested.49
The first experimental confirmation of neuroprotective properties of adenosine analogues in cerebral ischemia has been provided by Evans et al.52 and von Lubitz et al.53,54 A variety of in vitro and in vivo models of hypoxic/ischemic models of neuronal injury have been used in most of the subsequent studies of neuroprotection afforded by adenosine, its analogues, and inhibitors of its uptake.4 Moreover, the effect of these approaches has been also investigated in seizures55 and in either clinical56 or in vitro hypoglycemia.57 Since pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia has been extensively reviewed,58–60 for the purpose of the present review suffice to say that the arrest of brain blood supply results in a rapid depolarization of neuronal membranes,61 massive release of excitatory neurotransmitters11 and excitation of postsynaptic glutamate receptors (NMDA and non-NMDA59), followed by influx of calcium and its release from intracellular stores.62 The latter process triggers a series of cascading events60 that ultimately lead to neuronal demise.
From the preceding brief discussion of the effects of adenosine receptor stimulation it is apparent that adenosine analogues may be applicable in interrupting several iscfiemia-associated events, e.g., membrane (hypoxic) depolarization, neurotransmitter release, hyperexcitation of NMDA receptors, and calcium influx.
Endogenous Adenosine and Hypoxic Depolarization
Rapid depolarization of neuronal membrane is one of the initial events evoked by either impaired or entirely interrupted supply of the cerebral blood flow.63 Moreover, duration of hypoxic depolarization may be the determining factor that dictates the subsequent fate of neurons, i.e., their survival or death.64
Hypoxic depolarization is associated with enhanced influx of calcium through voltage-gated calcium channels,59 and concomitant increase in neurotransmitter release. Since intraischemic liberation of endogenous adenosine precedes that of glutamate,7 and since intraischemically released adenosme both significantly delays the onset of hypoxic depoiarization65 and reduces glutamate release,66 it appears that adenosine-mediated protective processes take place already at the very beginning of the insult.
Adenosine A1 Receptors and Excitatory Neurotransmitter Release
Significant reduction of intraischemic release of glutamate by the A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and the A1/A2 agonist N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) has been demonstrated in the 4-vessel occlusion rat model of ischemia.66 Reduction of glutamate release by the A1 agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) has been also reported in focal ischemia in the rat3 and in forebrain ischemia in the gerbil (Marangos and von Luhitz, unpublished). However, while glycine levels were significantly attenuated by CRA in a study of global ischemia in rahhits,67 the reduction of glutamate showed only a dose-dependent but statistically insignificant trend. Nonetheless, even if in the latter study glutamate release was affected only to a limited extent, the protective effect of adenosine agonist is still likely.
Glycine is necessary for activation of the ion-gated channel of the NMDA receptor which regulates calcium influx.68 Moreover, several studies have showed that glycine antagonists and partial agonists have a neuroprotective effect.69,70 Therefore, It is conceivable that, despite a variable effect on the liberation of glutamate, CHA-mediated reduction in glycine release may diminish the functional efficiency of the NMDA receptor-associated ion-gated channel, and thereby decrease the subsequent calcium overload.
Endogenous Adenosine and Glutamate Uptake Sites
Postischemic release of glutamate is comparatively brief and abates within approximately 30 min.11 However, postischemic depression of CBF seen severe ischemia (hypo perfusion stage) may result in secondary hypoxia,71 Hence, a supplementary elevation in the extracellular glutamate concentration is also quite possible and may, unless astrocytic transport mechanisms remain intact, lead to exacerbation of the excitotoxic processes initiated by the primary event. Interestingly, Anderson et al.72 have showed that even a brief (5-min) ischemia results in a prolonged upregulation of high-affinity excitatory amino acid (EAA) transport sites. At the same time, Schmidt et al.73 have showed that a brief 10-min exposure to adenosine produces a significant increase in the density of high-affinity glutamate and aspartate uptake sites in rat hippocampal slices. Therefore, it is possible that intraischemic elevation of brain adenosine74 may, apart from its effect on neurotransmitter release, also result in a sustained upregulation of EAA transport ers. Consequently, due to its control of both release and uptake of EAAs, endogenous adenosine may play an important role in prevention of excitotoxic damage following very brief ischemic periods, the absence of which has been noted by several authors.75,76
Postsynaptic Effects of Adenosine and Neurodegeneration
The intensity of excitatory synaptic input depends on the amount of NMDA-mediated influx of Ca2+77 which, in turn, increases membrane depolarization and acts as a synaptic amplifier. Since the evoked influx of calcium is tightly controlled by postsynaptic A1 receptors even at low extracellular Ca2+ concentrations,29,30,78 such control tends to attenuate calcium-mediated synaptic amplification.4 Consequently, adenosine and its postsynaptic A1 receptors regulate critical input frequencies required to operate postsynaptic NMDA receptors, as was recently demonstrated by Schubert and his colleagues.30,79
The additional, albeit indirect, benefit of reduced NMDA receptor-mediated depolarization elicited by interaction of adenosine with its A1 receptors is the effect on voltage-sensitive K+ currents.35 DepolarizatIOn appears to block these currents and enhances neuronal excitability and firing rate.80 Hence, vigorous activatIOn of A1 receptors by elevated concentrations of extracellular adenosine may counteract NMDA receptor-mediated depolarization, and drive the membrane potential toward voltage ranges at which depolarization-dependent block of potassium conductance is either less likely or does not occur.4
Apart from its enhancing effect on potassium conductance,36,37,81 adenosine stimulates voltage-dependent Cl- conductance as well.38,82 It has been suggested that the openmg of this conductance may diminish accumulation of intraneuronal Cl- during repetitive firing4 which, unless prevented, will eventually impair GABAergic inhibition.83 Elevation in extracellular adenosine during periods of enhanced neuronal activity41 may, therefore, assist in maintaining GABA-mediated inhibition, and constitute another functional aspect of the protective adenosine/adenosine receptor complex.
Adenosine A2 Receptors and Neurodegeneration
The concept of A2 receptor involvement in neurodegeneration has not been pursued with the same vigor as that of A1 receptors. There is, however, indirect, evidence that A2 receptors may play a pivotal role in neuronal death observed in the striatum, and possibly also in the substantia nigra. Contrary to general belief, it is the dorsolateral aspect of striatum rather than the hippocampal CA4 sector75 that appears to be endowed with the highest sensitivity to ischemic insult.84,85 Light microscopic evidence of neuronal impairment in the striatum is clearly discernible already 1 h after a very light ischemic episode. while acute ischemic damage in the hippocampal CA4 appears 6–12 h after the event.84 Rapid, intraischemic release of dopamine and glutamate,85,86 persistent elevation of cAMP,87 and eventual loss of dopamine D2 receptors86 precede morphologic damage of striatal neurons.
Globus et al.85 have showed that, while increased concentration of intrastriatal dopamine alone has no adverse effect, elevated concentration of both dopamine and glutamate is associated with striatal vulnerability to ischemia. Since dopamine D2 receptors attenuate the effect of glutamatergic stimulation,88 it is possible that accelerated postischemic loss of D2 receptors, rather than elevated concentration of both qeurotransmitters per se may constitute one of the critical factors resulting in the apparent potentiation of glutamate-evoked damage. The most characteristic aspect of this damage is its containment to the medium-sized spiny neurons containing enkephalin and substance P,84i.e., neurons receiving glutamatergic input from both substantia nigra and neocortex.88 Moreover, the same medium-sized GABAergic enkephalin-containing neurons are also characterized by the highest density of adenosine A2 receptors.24
Based on the existing evidence, and on the fact that stimulation of adenosine A2 receptor decreases the affinity of D2 receptors to agonist stimulation,48 it is possible to construct a chain of conjectural events that may ultimately lead to the selective neuronal loss in the striatum. Most likely, the initial intraischemic surge of adenosine agitates high-affinity A2a receptors located on enkephalin-containing GABAergic neurons. At the same time, the colocahzed D2 receptors which attenuate glutamatergic excitation supplied by cortical and nigro-striatal fibers88 will be stimulated by dopamine, whose concentration also increases. However, the activated A2 receptors decrease affinity of the colocalized D2 sites to dopamine,24 thereby diminishing the efficiency of their counterexcitatory effect. Ultimately, combination of A2-D2 interactions and postischemic loss of D2 receptors86 will result in a progressive shift toward unopposed glutamatergic hyperexcitation whose intensity will, eventually, attain the level sufficient to induce excitotoxic damage of enkephalin-containing GABAergic neurons.
Contrary to A1 receptors, the time course of ischemia-induced adenosine A2 receptor disappearance is unknown. However, cerebral ischemia causes elevation in striatal cAMP that persists for at least 4 h after the reperfusion.87 Since stimulation of A2 receptors leads to production of cAMP,4,14 its prolonged postischemic presence may indicate that the functional A2 receptors are preserved for several hours following the insult. Moreover, it was shown recently that A2 receptor stimulation enhances ischemia-evoked release of glutamate and aspartate.44 Thus, although the mechanism involved in this process is unknown, the sustained operation of A2 receptors may amplify the damage to enkephalin-containing GABAergic neurons even further.
Allowing that this speculative sequence of events is correct, its repercussions on “downstream” damage caused by ischemia may be significant. Both global and prolonged forebrain ischemia cause damage in the substantia nigra as well as in the striatum and the hippocampus.89,90 Hence, possible involvement of A2 receptors in development of the rapid damage to the inhibitory enkephalin-containing neurons in the striatum may contribute to the subsequent loss of inhibitory input to the substantia nigra, and amplify the adverse effects of ischemia-associated hyperstimulation also in that region.
The pattern of striatal neuron loss in cerebral ischemia is very similar to that observed in Huntington's chorea84 and, although the postischemic fate of A2 receptors is presently unknown, a significant decrease in their density was observed in striatal tissue of patients with Huntington's disease,91 Since adenosine A2 receptors appear to play an important role in pathophysiology basal ganglia associated with Huntington's and Parkinson's diseases,25,46,92 drugs acting at these receptors may prove very useful in the treatment of these disorders. Involvement of A2 receptors in neurodegenerative processes of different etiology is the subject of current, intensive studies at our laboratory.
Striatum apart, stimulation of adenosine A2 receptors may result in an improved postischemic survival of neurons in other regions through, e.g., improvement of postischemic CBF93 or prevention of postischemic inflammatory processes.94 Normalization of postischemic CBF may be obtained through A2 receptor-mediated vasodilation5,23,95 and through antithrombotic effects.96,97 Moreover, since stimulation of A2 receptors prevents activation of neutrophils, it may, through concomitant reduction in free radical release, diminish the damage to the endothelial lining of cerebral blood vessels.98 Finally, stimulation of leukocyte A2 receptors decreases their adherence to capillary walls, and appears to be involved in prevent ing postischemic “plugging” of cerebral capillaries.99
Effects of Acute Administration
The results of experimental studies of the neuroprotective effects of adenosine, its analogues, and agents affecting its turnover are the subject of several recent reviews.3–5,100,101 Most of those studies concentrate on investigations of either forebrain or global cerebral ischemia, and use survival and/or neuropathology as the measures of outcome.
Due to their well-known physiological properties and their relevance in treatment of cerebral ischemia, A1 receptors are the chief subject of the existing experimental work.3,4 Significant neuroprotection has been reported in virtually all studies of focal (but see Roussel et al, 1991), global, and forebrain ischemia in which A1 receptor agonists have been administered either shortly before or after the insult, whose duration ranged from 5 to 30 min.3,4 However, since the maximum interval between pretreatment and ischemia was 15 min, and maximum postischemic delay did not exceed 30 min, the dimension of the therapeutic window within which acutely administered adenosine agonists are effective is uncertain. It is known, however, that rapid downregulation of A1 receptors follows even a mild anoxic or ischemic episode,103,104 and that 14–24 h after ischemia, A1 receptors become dysfunctional.4 Thus, since the strength of adenosine modulation depends on the density of A1 receptors,105 the therapeutic window for administration of A1 analogues is probably not an extensive one.4
The veracity of neuroprotective effects of A1 receptor agonists has been confirmed by studies in which A1 antagonists have been used.4 Uniformly, administration of antagonists has resulted in severe exacerbation of mortality,106 and in amplified neuronal destruction.4
Contrary to the effects of A1 receptor agonists, the results following acute administration of agents active at A2 receptors is virtually unknown. Recently, however, Gao and Phillis107 showed that pretreatment with a weakly selective A2 antagonist CGS 15943 resulted in protection of the hippocampus against ischemic damage.Our own results (von Lubitz et al., in preparation) indicate that A2 antagonists administered prior to 10-min ischemia protect not only hippocampus but striatum as well.
Presently, only one report describes the effect of acute A3 receptor stimulation on the outcome offorebrain ischemia,50 The study shows that preischemic administration of a small dose (100 μg/kg) of a selective A3 agonist, N6 – (3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5′-methylcarboxamide (IB-MECA), results in an extensive hippocampal damage and a very high mortality (90%) within the initial 24 h after ischemia.
Despite their neuroprotective efficacy, the acute treatment with adenosine A1 agonists is accompanied by two major side effects, i.e., hypothermia and hypotension. Since hypothermia results in a significant reduction of postischemic neuronal damage,107 it is possible that A1 agonists mediate their neutron-sparing effect chiefly through the depression of brain temperature. However, both in vitro sutdies108 and studies in which brain temperature has been carefully maintained106 indicate that the protective effect is preserved also in the normothermic environment. Moreover, it must be remembered that, in the context of therapies aimed at stroke and brain ischemia, the comparatively mild hypothermic impact of A1 receptor agonists may constitute a benefit rather than a hindrance.
Failure of cerebral perfusion pressure after ischemia is among the most critical factors that influence clinical recovery,109,110 and hypotension and cardiodepression accompanying administration of A1 agonists constitute potentially serious side effects of A1 receptor-based therapies. Cardiovascular side effects of A1 receptor agomsts may be countered by coadministration of peripheral adenosine antagonists. However, von Lubitz and Marangos111 have showed that, although concomitant postischemic administration of the A1 receptor agonist CHA and the peripheral adenosine antagonist 8-p-sulphophenyladenosine (8-SPT) in gerbils resulted in a full normalization of CHA-evoked hypotension, the combined CHA/8-SPT treatment does not improve either survival and neurological impairment scores beyond those attained with CHA alone.
Effects of Chronic Administration
Among all disorders for which adenosine-based therapies have been envisated, only stroke offers a target for their acute administration while most, if not all, other central nervous system (CNS) diseases require chronic, frequently even life-long, exposure. However, very little is known about the chronic effects of agents acting at adenosine receptors in the context of neuronal pathologies. The pioneering study of Rudolphi et al.112 showed that chronic treatment with caffeine—a nonspecific A1/A2 antagonist—resulted in protection against ischemic damage in gerbils (i.e., the exactly opposite effect to that obtained with acute administration of another nonspecific antagonist, theophylline),76 Von Lubitz et al.106,112,113,115 have investigated the consequences of chronic administration of drugs acting at adenosine receptors further, and have used the highly potent A1 agonist CPA or antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (CPX). The work of the latter authors has confirmed the results of Rudolphi and his colleagues,76,112 and has also showed that while acute treatment with a selective A1 receptor agonist is highly protectlve, chronic treatment with the same drug has a profoundly aggravating effect in several measures of postischemic recovery, i.e., survival, neurological status, and preservation of ischemia-vulnerable brain regions. Treatment with A1 receptor antagonists, on the other hand, produced a diametrically opposite effect, I.e., acute administration enhanced, and chronic administration protected against the damage.106 The same authors also showed that while acute treatment with adenosine A3 receptor agonist enhanced ischemia-associated damage, chronic treatment was highly ameliorative,50 Preliminary studies with agents acting at A2 receptors indicate the same pattern of regimen-dependent reversal. Interestingly, regimen-dependency of the therapeutic outcome of adenosine-based treatment has been also described in NMDA-evoked seizures,50,113,116 and in the water maze modd of learning and memory.114
Despite numerous and convincing demonstrations of neuroprotective effects of endogenous adenosine, and despite highly alluring results of experimental treatment of cerebral ischemia with agents acting at all three adenosine receptor subtypes, a number of unsolved puzzles exists. We have already mentioned the fact that, although critical from the therapeutic point of view, time limits for efficient administration of acute adenosine therapies in stroke and cerebral ischemia are unknown. Glial response to the activation of their A1 and A2 receptors is also very poorly known, although there are indications that both glycogenolysis117 and astrocytic edema118 may ensue.
Degradation of endogenous adenosine contributes to the generation of highly destructive free radicals.119 Since administration of free radical scavengers virtually, eliminated production of superoxide species during and after cerebral ischemia,119 therapies based upon elevation of endogenous adenosine may be less effective than those employing stimulation of adenosine receptors with appropriate analogues. Unquestionably, the problem requires a detailed and urgent examination. Finally, there is virtually no information on the interplay of individual adenosine receptor subtypes, although there are indications that such interplay may be critical for neuronal function and survival.50
The paradoxical effects of adenosine receptor-based therapies require further studies as well. The regimen-dependent nature of the outcome has been already mentioned. Prolonged stimulation by agonists or blockade by antagonists both in vitro and in vivo produces, respectively, either down- or upregulation of adenosine receptor density.18,49,120 However, in some studies, no changes of either receptor density or ligand binding properties (Kd) were observed during prolonged exposure to selective A1 agonists and antagonists, and to a nonselective A1/A2 angatonist theophylline in vivo.106,115,116 On the other hand, Fastbom and Fredholm have showed that prolonged exposure to theophylline upregulates adenosine receptors, and Shi et al.122 have reported that chronic treatment with caffeine (a nonspecific A1/A2 antagonist) both upregulates A1 receptors and results in very dramatic density shifts of some receptor types (e.g., GABA, dopamine, noradrenaline), while having no effect on others (e.g., NMDA). Finally, chronic caffeine-mediated upreguiation of A1 sites and its functional consequences were the most likely source of protection against ischemia reported by Rudolphi et al.112
Although the protective effect of chronically administered A1 antagonists is easily explained when accompanied by receptor upregulation, the nature of the mechanisms behind ameliorative actions of a chronic antagonist regimen observed in absence of increased density of A1 receptors remains entirely obscure. Changes in G-protein-mediated receptor-efIector coupling have been proposed as a putative answer to the regimen-dependent shifts seen after chronic exposure to both nonselective and selective agonists and antagonists106,115,116 Significant alterations in GSα and GIα proteins that were unaccompanied by a corresponding change in their mRNAs have been seen in rat adipocytes following chronic treatment with A1 receptor antagonist.123 However, whether similar phenomena take place in the brain remains to be demonstrated.
The effect of acute stimulation of A1 and A3 receptors offers another paradox. While both receptors arc negatively coupled to adenylate cyclase (i.e., reduce its levels), acute preischemic activation of A1 causes extensive neuroprotection. Acute activation of A3 receptors, on the other hand, has an equally extensive but damaging result in cerebral ischemia,50 although it is protective against NMDA-evoked seizures.51 Moreover, chronic administration of A3 receptor agonist protects equally well against cerebral ischemia and against chemically and electrically evoked seizures.50,51
Clearly, there are a number of questions that require additional, extensive studies. On the other hand, even if several aspects of adenosine action on a living cell, be it a neuron, a cardiac myocyte, or a nephron are unknown, Newby's “retaliatory metabolite” has already found its practical application in cardiology. Thus, under the name “Adenocard™,” adenosine is now clinically used in treatment of supraventricular tachycardias, and it is not a premature hope that soon the concept of adenosine-based therapies will also find its application in treatment of the disorders of the brain.
REFERENCES
1. Newby AC. Adenosine and the concept of “retaliatory metabolites.” TIPS. 1984;9:42–48.
2. Phillis JW, Wu PH. The role of adenosine and its nucleotides in central synaptic transmission. Progr. Neurobiol. 1981;16:187–239. [PubMed]
3. Miller LP, Hsu C. Therapeutic potential for adenosine receptor activation in ischemic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 1992;9(Suppl. 2):S563–577. [PubMed]
4. Rudolphi KA, Schubert P, Parkinson FE, Fredholm BB. Adenosine and brain ischemia. Cerebrovasc. Brain Metab. Rev. 1992;4:346–369. [PubMed]
5. von Lubitz DKJE, Marangos PJ. Self-defense of the brain: adenosinergic strategies in neurodegeneration. In: Marangos PJ, Lal H, editors. Emerging Strategies in Neuroprotection. Birkhauser; Boston: 1992. pp. 151–186.
6. Marangos PJ, Boulenger JP. Basic and clinical aspects of adenosinergic neuromodulation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1985;9:421–430. [PubMed]
7. Matsumoto K, Graf R, Rosner G, Schimada N, Weiss WD. Flow thresholds for extracellular purine catabolite elevation in rat focal ischemia. Brain Res. 1992;579:309–314. [PubMed]
8. Hoehn K, White TD. Role of excitatory amino acid receptors in K+ and glutamate-evoked release of endogenous adenosine from rat cortical slices. J. Neurochem. 1990;54:256–265. [PubMed]
9. Hoehn K, White TD. N-methyl-D-aspartate, kainate and quisqualate release endogenous adenosine from rat cortical slices. Neurosci. 1990;39:441–450. [PubMed]
10. Benveniste H, Drejer J, Schousboe A, Diemer NH. Elevation of the extracellular concentrations of glutamate and aspartate in rat hippocampus during transient cerebral ischemia monitored by intracerebral microdialysis. J. Neurochem. 1984;43:1369–1374. [PubMed]
12. Andiné P, Orwar O, Jacobson I, Sandberg M, Hagberg H. Changes in extracellular amino acids and spontaneous neuronal activity during ischemia and extended reflow in the CA1 of the rat hippocampus. J. Neurochem. 1991;57:222–229. [PubMed]
13. Phillis JW, Walter GA, Simpson RE. Brain adenosine and transmitter amino acid release from the ischemic rat cerebral cortex: effects of the adenosine deaminase inhibitor deoxycoformycin. J. Neurochem. 1991;56:644–650. [PubMed]
14. van Calker D, Müller M, Hamprecht G. Adenosine regulates via two different types of receptors the accumulation of cyclic AMP in cultured brain cells. J. Neurochem. 1979;33:999–1005. [PubMed]
15. Jacobson KA, van Galen PJM, Williams M. Perspective, adenosine receptors: pharmacology, structure activity relationships, and therapeutic potential. J. Med. Chem. 1992;35:407–422. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Stiles GL. Adenosine receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 267:6451–6454. [PubMed]
17. Ji X-D, von Lubitz D, Olah ME, Stiles GL, Jacobson KA. Species differences in ligand affinity at central A3 adenosine receptors. Drug Dev. Res. 1994;33:51–59.
18. Ramkumar V, Bumgarner JR, Jacobson KA, Stiles GL. Multiple components of the A1 adenosine receptor-adenylate cyclase system are regulated in rat cerebral cortex by chronic caffeine ingestion. J. Clin. Invest. 1988;82:242–247. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Jarvis MF, Williams M. Adenosine in central nervous system function. In: Williams M, editor. Adenosine and Adenosine Receptors. Humana Press; Clifton: 1989. pp. 423–474.
20. Jacobson KA, Nikodijević O, Shi D, Gallo-Rodriguez C, Olah ME, Stiles GL, Daly JW. A role for central adenosine A3 receptors: mediation of behavioral depressant responses. FEBS Lett. 1993;336:57–64. [PubMed]
21. Cotman CW, Monaghan DT, Ottersen OP, Storm-Mathiesen J. Anatomical organization of excitatory amino acid receptors and their pathways. TINS. 1987;10:273–280.
22. Daval J-L, von Lubitz DKJE, Deckert J, Redmond DJ, Marangos PJ. Protective effect of cyclohexyladenosine on adenosine A1 receptors, guanine nucleotide and forskolin binding sites following transient brain ischemia: a quantitative autoradiographic study. Brain Res. 1989;491:212–226. [PubMed]
23. van Wylen DGL, Sciotti VM, Winn HR. Adenosine and the regulation of cerebral blood flow. In: Phillis JW, editor. Adenosine and Adenine Nucleotides as Regulators of Cellular Function. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 1991. pp. 191–202.
24. Ferré S, Fuxe K, von Euler G, Johansson B, Fredholm BB. Adenosine-dopamine interactions in the brain. Neurosci. 1992;51:501–512. [PubMed]
25. Barraco RA, Martens KA, Parizon M, Normile HJ. Adenosine A2a receptors in the nuclclls accumbens mediate locomotor depression. Brain Res. Bull. 1993;31:397–404. [PubMed]
26. Kostopoulos GK, Phillis JW. Purinergic depression of neurons in different areas of the brain. Exp. Neurol. 1977;55:719–724. [PubMed]
27. Dunwiddie TV, Hoffer BJ. Adenine nucleotides and synaptic transmission in the in vitro rat hippocampus. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1980;69:59–68. [PubMed]
28. Wu PH, Phillis JW, Thierry DL. Adenosine receptor agonists inhibit K+ evoked Ca2+ uptake by rat cortical synaptosomes. J. Neurochem. 1982;39:700–708. [PubMed]
29. Schubert P, Heinemann U, Kolb R. Differential effect of adenosine on pre- and postsynaptic calcium fluxes. Brain Res. 1986;376:382–386. [PubMed]
30. Schubert P, Keller F, Rudolphi KA. Depression of synaptic transmission and evoked NMDA Ca2+ influx in hippocampal neurons by adenosine and its blockade by LTP or ischemia. Drug Dev. Res. 1993;28:399–405.
31. Harms HH, Wardeh G, Mulder AH. Adenosine modulates depolarization-induced release of 3H-noradrenaline from slices of rat brain neocortex. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1978;49:305–308. [PubMed]
32. Dolphin AC, Archer ER. An adenosine agonist inhibits and a cyclic AMP analogue enhances the release of glutamate but not GABA from slices of rat dentate gyrus. Neurosci. Lett. 1983;43:49–54. [PubMed]
33. Coradetti R, Lo Conte G, Moroni F, Passani MB, Pepeu G. Adenosine decreases aspartate and glutamate release from rat hippocampal slices. Eur. J. Pharmacal. 1984;104:19–26. [PubMed]
34. Fredholm BB, Dunwiddie TV. How does adenosine inhibit transmitter release? TIPS. 1988;9:130–134. [PubMed]
35. Haas HL, Greene RW. Adenosine enhances afterhyperpolarization and accommodation in hippocampal pyramidal cells. Pflüg. Arch. 1984;402:144–247. [PubMed]
36. Greene RW, Haas HL. The electrophysiology of adenosine in the mammalian central nervous system. Progr. Neurobiol. 1991;36:329–34l. [PubMed]
37. Thompson SM, Haas HL, Gähwiler BH. Comparison of the actions of adenosine at pre- and postsynaptic receptors in the rat hippocampus in vitro. J. Physiol. 1992;451:347–363. [PubMed]
38. Schubert P, Ferroni S, Mager R. Pharmacological blockade of Cl– pumps or Cl– channels reduces the adenosine mediated depression of stimulation train-evoked Ca2+ fluxes in rat hippocampal slices. Neurosci. Lett. 1991;124:174–177. [PubMed]
39. Gerber U, Greene RW, Haas HL, Stevens DR. Characterization of inhibition mediated by adenosine in the hippocampus of the rat in vivo. J. Physiol. 1989;417:567–578. [PubMed]
40. Dunwiddie TV. The physiological role of adenosine in the central nervous system. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 1985;27:64–139. [PubMed]
41. Dunwiddie TV. Endogenously released adenosine regulates excitability in the in vitro hippocampus. Epilepsia. 1980;21:541–548. [PubMed]
42. Sebastiao AM, Ribeiro JA. Evidence for the presence of A2 adenosine receptors in the rat hippocampus. Neurosci. Lett. 1992;138:41. [PubMed]
43. Spignoli G, Pedata F, Pepeu GC. A1 and A2 adenosine receptors modulate acetylcholine release from brain slices. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1984;97:341–342. [PubMed]
44. O'Regan MH, Simpson RE, Perkins LM, Phillis JW. The selective adenosine A2 receptor agonist CGS 21680 enhances excitatory transmitter amino acid rclease from the ischemic rat cerebral cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 1992;138:169–172. [PubMed]
45. Mayfield RD, Suzuki F, Zahniser N. Adenosine A2a receptor modulation of electrically evoked endogenous GABA release from slices of rat globus pallidus. J. Neurochem. 1993;60:2334–2337. [PubMed]
46. Schiffmann SN, Halleux P, Menu R, Vanderhaeghen J-J. Adenosine A2a receptor expression in striatal neurons: implications for basal ganglia pathophysiology. Drug Dev. Res. 1993;28:381–385.
47. Ferré S, Snaprud P, Fuxe K. Opposing actions of an adenosine A2 and a GTP analogue on the regulation of dopamine D2 receptors in rat neostriatal membranes. Eur. J. Pharmacol. Mol. Pharmacol. Sect. 1993;244:311–315. [PubMed]
48. Ferré S, von Euler G, Johansson B, Fredholm BB, Fuxe K. Stimulation of high affinity adenosine A-2 receptors decreases the affinity of dopamine D-2 receptors in rat striatal membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88:7238–7241. [PubMed]
49. Abbracchio MP, Fogliatto GP, Paoletti AM, Rovati E, Cattabeni F. Prolonged in vitro exposure of rat brain slices to adenosine analogues: selective desensitization of adenosine A1 but not A2 receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. Mol. Pharmacol. Sect. 1992;227:317–324. [PubMed]
50. von Lubitz DKJE, Lin RC-S, Popik P, Carter MF, Jacobson KA. Adenosine A3 receptor stimulation and cerebral ischemia. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1994 In press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. von Lubitz DKJE, Deutsch SI, Carter MF, Lin RC-S, Mastropaolo J, Jacobson KA. The effects of adenosine A3 receptor stimulation on seizures in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1994 In press. [PubMed]
52. Evans MC, Swan JH, Meldrum BS. An adenosine analogue, 2-chloroadenosine, protects against long term development of ischaemic cell loss in the rat hippocampus. Neurosci. Lett. 1987;83:287–292. [PubMed]
53. von Lubitz DKJE, Dambrosia JM, Kempski O. Abstr. X Int. Congr. Neuropathol. Vol. 108. Stockholm: 1986. Postischemic application of cyclohexyladenosine (CHA): improvement of survival and of preservation of selectively vulnerable areas in gerbil.
54. von Lubitz DKJE, Dambrosia JM, Redmond DJ. Protective effect of cyclohexyl adenosine in treatment of cerebral ischemia in gerbils. Neuroscience. 1989;2:451–457. [PubMed]
55. Dragunow M. Adenosine and epileptic seizures. In: Phillis JW, editor. Adenosine and Adenine Nucleotides as Regulators of Cellular Function. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 1991. pp. 367–379.
56. Hvidberg A, Rasmussen MH, Christensen NJ, Hilsted J. Theophylline enhances glucose recovery after hypoglycemia in healthy man and in type I diabetic patients. Metabolism. 1994;43:776–781. [PubMed]
57. Fredholm BB, Lindstrom K, Wallman-Johansson A. Propentophylline and other adenosine transport inhibitors increase the efflux of adenosine following electrical and metabolic stimulation of rat hippocampal slices. J. Neurochem. 1994;62:563–573. [PubMed]
58. Raichle M. The pathophysiology of brain ischemia. Ann. Neurol. 1983;13:9–10. [PubMed]
59. Siesjö BK, Bengtsson F. Calcium fluxes, calcium antagonists, and calcium-related pathology in brain ischemia, hypoglycemia, and spreading depression: a unifying hypothesis. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1989;9:127. [PubMed]
60. Choi DW. Excitotoxic cell death. J. Neurobiol. 1992;9:1261–1276. [PubMed]
61. Hansen AJ. Effect of anoxia on ion distribution in the brain. Physiol. Rev. 1985;65:101–148. [PubMed]
62. Beal MF. Mechanisms of excitotoxicity in neurologic disease. FASEB J. 1992;6:3338–3344. [PubMed]
63. Hansen AJ. Ion homeostasis in cerebral ischemia. In: Schurr A, Rigor BM, editors. Cerebral Ischemia and Resuscitation. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 1990. pp. 77–87.
64. Balestrino M, Aitken P, Somjen G. Spreading depression-like hypoxic depolarization in CA1 and facia dentata of hippocampal slices: relationship to selective vulnerability. Brain Res. 1989;497:102–107. [PubMed]
65. Lee KS, Lowenkopf T. Endogenous adenosine delays the onset of hypoxic depolarization in the rat hippocampus in vitro via an action at A1 receptors. Brain Res. 1993;609:313–315. [PubMed]
66. Simpson RE, O'Reagan MH, Perkins LM, Phillis JW. Excitatory transmitter amino acid release from the ischemic rat cerebral cortex. Effects of adenosine agonists and antagonists. J. Neurochem. 1992;58:1683–1690. [PubMed]
67. Cantor SL, Zornow MH, Miller LP, Yaksh TL. The effect of cydohexyladenosine on the periischemic increases of hippocampal glutamate and glycine in the rabbit. J. Neurochem. 1992;59:1884–1892. [PubMed]
68. Kleckner NW, Dingledine R. Requirement for glycine in activation of NMDA-receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Science. 1988;241:835–837. [PubMed]
69. Gill R, Woodruff GN. The neuroprotective actions of kynurenic acid and MK-801 in gerbils are synergistic and not related to hypothermia. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1990;176:143–149. [PubMed]
70. von Lubitz DKJE, Lin RC-S, McKenzie RJ, Devlin TM, Skolnick P, McCabe RT. A novel treatment of global cerebral ischemia with a glycine partial agonist. Eur J. Pharmacol. 1992;219:153–158. [PubMed]
71. Bengtsson F, Siesjö BK. Cell damage in cerebral ischemia: physiological, biochemical, and structural aspects. In: Schurr A, Rigor BM, editors. Cerebral Ischemia and Resuscitation. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 1990. pp. 215–233.
72. Anderson KJ, Nellgärd B, Wieloch T. Ischemia-induced upregulation of excitatory amino acid transporters. Brain Res. 1993;622:93–98. [PubMed]
73. Schmidt W, Wolf G, Grungreiff K, Linke K. Adenosine influences the high affinity uptake of transmitter glutamate and aspartate under conditions of hepatic encephalopathy. Metab. Brain Dis. 1993;8:73–80. [PubMed]
74. Phillis JW, O'Regan MH, Walter GA. Effects of deoxycoformycin on adenosinc, inosine, hypoxanthine, xanthine, and uric acid release from the hypoxaemic rat cerebral cortex. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1988;8:733–741. [PubMed]
75. Kirino T, Sano K. Selective vulnerability in the gerbil hippocampus following transient ischemia. Acta Neuropathol. (Berlin) 1984;62:201–208. [PubMed]
76. Rudolphi KA, Keil M, Hinze HJ. Effect of theophylline on ischemically induced hippocampal damage in Mongolian gerbils: a behavioural and histopathological study. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1987;7:74–81. [PubMed]
77. Herron CE, Lester RJ, Coan EJ, Collingridge GL. Frequency-dependent involvement of NMDA receptors in the hippocampus: a novel synaptic mechanism. Nature. 1986;322:265–268. [PubMed]
78. Schubert P. Physiological modulation by adenosine selective blockade of A1 receptors with DPCPX enhances stimulus train-evoked neuronal Ca influx in rat hippocampal slices. Brain Res. 1988;458:162–165. [PubMed]
79. Schubert P, Mager R. The critical input frequency for NMDA-mediated neuronal Ca2+ frequency depends on endogenous adenosine. Int. J. Purine Pyrimidine Res. 1991;2:11–25.
80. Segal M, Rogawski MA, Barker JL. A transient potassium conductance regulates the excitability of cultured hippocampal and spinal neurons. J. Neurosci. 1984;4:604–609. [PubMed]
81. Trussel LO, Jackson BJ. Dependence of an adenosine activated postassium current on GTP-binding protein in mammalian neurons. J. Neurosci. 1987;7:3306–3316. [PubMed]
82. Mager R, Ferroni S, Schubert P. Adenosine modulates a voltage-dependent chloride conductance in cultured hippocampal neurons. Brain Res. 1990;532:58–62. [PubMed]
83. Thompson SM, Gähwiler BH. Activity dependent disinhihition. 1. Repetitive stimulation reduces IPSP driving force and conductance in rat hippocampus in vitro. J. Neurophysiol. 1989;61:501–511. [PubMed]
84. Chesselet M-F, Gonzales C, Lin C-S, Polsky K, Jin B-K. Ischemic damage in the striatum of adult gerbils: relative sparing of somatostatinergic and cholinergic interneurons contrasts with loss of efferent neurons. Exp. Neurol. 1990;110:209–218. [PubMed]
85. Globus MYT, Busto R, Dietrich WD, Martines E, Valdes I, Ginsberg MD. Intra-ischemia extracellular release of dopamine is associated with striatal vulnerability to ischemia. Neurosci. Lett. 1988;91:36–40. [PubMed]
85. Globus MYT, Busto R, Martinez E, Valdes I, Dietrich WD, Ginsberg MD. Comparative effect of transient global ischemia on extracellular levels of glutamate, glycine, and γ-aminobutyric acid in vulnerable and nonvulnerable brain regions in the rat. J. Neurochem. 1991;57:470–478. [PubMed]
85. Crain BJ, Westerkam WD, Harrison AH, Nadler JV. Selective neuronal death after transient forebrdin ischemia in the Mongolian gerbil: a silver impregnation study. Neuroscience. 1988;27:387–402. [PubMed]
86. Chang CJ, Ishii H, Yamamoto H, Yamamoto T, Spatz M. Effects of cerebral on regional dopamine release and D1 and D2 receptors. J. Neurochem. 1993;60:1483–1490. [PubMed]
87. Prado R, Busto R, Globus MYT. Ischemia-induced changes in extracellular levels of striatal cyclic AMP: role of dopamine neurotransmission. J. Neurochem. 1992;59:1581–1584. [PubMed]
88. Cepeda N, Buchwald A, Levine MS. Neuromodulatory actions of dopamine in the neostriatum are dependent upon the excitatory amino acid receptor subtypes activated. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1993;90:9576–9580. [PubMed]
89. Diemer NH, Siemkowicz E. Regional neuronal damage after cerebral ischemia in normo- and hypoglycemic rats. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1981;7:217–227. [PubMed]
90. Araki T, Kato H, Kogure K. Selective neuronal vulnerability following transient cerebral ischemia in the gerbil: distribution and time course. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1989;80:548–553. [PubMed]
91. Martinez-Mir MI, Probst A, Palacios JM. Adenosine A2 receptors: selective localization in the human basal ganglia and alterations with disease. Neuroscience. 1991;42:697–706. [PubMed]
92. Schiffmann SN, Vanderhaeghen J-J. Adenosine A2 receptors regulate the gene expression of striatopallidal and striatonigral neurons. J. Neurosci. 1993;13:1080–1087. [PubMed]
93. Forrester T, Harper AM, MacKenzie ET, Thompson EM. Effect of adenosine triphosphate and some derivatives on cerebral blood flow and metabolism. J. Physiol. 1979;296:343–355. [PubMed]
94. Cronstein BN, Levin RI, Belanoff J, Weissmann G, Hirschhorn R. Adenosine: an endogenous inhibitor of neurtrophil-mediated injury to endothelial cells. J. Clin. Invest. 1986;78:760–770. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
95. Sollevi A. Cardiovascular effects of adenosine in man: possible clinical implications. Progr. Neurobiol. 1986;27:319–349. [PubMed]
96. Born GVR, Cross MJ. The aggregation of blood platelets. J. Physiol. 1963;168:178–195. [PubMed]
97. Cusack NJ, Hourani SMO. Adenosine, adenine nucleotides, and platelet functions. In: Phillis JW, editor. Adenosine and Adenine Nucleotides as Regulators of Cellular Function. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 1991. pp. 121–131.
98. Cronstein BN. Purines and inflamation: neutrophils possess P1 and P2 purine receptors. In: Phillis JW, editor. Adenosine and Adenine Nucleotides as Regulators of Cellular Function. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 1991. pp. 133–140.
99. Grisham MB, Hernandez LA, Granger DN. Adenosine inhibits ischemia-reperfusion-induced leukocyte adherence and extravasation. Am. J. Physiol. 1989;257:H 1334–1339. [PubMed]
100. Dragunow M, Faull RLM. Neuroprotective effects of adenosine. TIPS. 1988;9:193–194. [PubMed]
101. Phillis JW. Adenosine, inosine, and the oxypurines in cerebral ischemia. In: Schurr A, Rigor BM, editors. Cerebral Ischemia and Resuscitation. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 1990. pp. 189–204.
103. Roussel S, Pinard E, Seylaz J. Focal cerebral ischemia in chronic hypertension: no protection by (R)-phenylisopropyladenosine. Brain Res. 1991;545:171–174. [PubMed]
103. Lee KS, Tetzlaffand W, Kreutzberg GW. Rapid downregulation of hippocampal adenosine receptors following brief anoxia. Brain Res. 1986;380:155–158. [PubMed]
104. Onodera H, Kogure K. Calcium antagonist, adenosine A3 and muscarine bindings in rat hippocampus after transient ischemia. Stroke. 1990;21:771–776. [PubMed]
105. Lee KS, Schubert P, Reddington M, Kreutzberg GW. Regulation of strength of adenosine modulation in the hippocampus by a differential distribution of the density of A1 receptors. Brain Res. 1983;260:156–159. [PubMed]
106. von Lubitz DKJE, Lin RC-S, Melman N, Ji X-D, Carter MF, Jacobson KA. Chronic administration of adenosine A1 receptor agonist or antagonist in cerebral ischemia. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1994;256:161–167. [PubMed]
107. Gao Y, Phillis JW. CGS 15943, an adenosine A2 receptor antagonist, reduces cerebral ischemic injury in the Mongolian gerbil. Life Sci. 1994;55:61–65. [PubMed]
107. Busto R, Dietrich WD, Globus MYT, Ginsberg MD. The importance of brain temperature in cerebral ischemic injury. Stroke. 1989;20:1113–1114. [PubMed]
108. Goldberg MP, Monyer H, Weiss JH, Choi DW. Adenosine reduces cortical neuronal injury induced by oxygen and glucose deprivation in vitro. Neurosci. Lett. 1988;89:323–327. [PubMed]
109. Wauquier A, Edmonds HL, Jr., Clincke GHC. Cerebral resuscitation: pathophysiology and therapy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1987;11:287–306. [PubMed]
110. Miller JT. Head injury and brain ischemia—implications for therapy. Br. J. Anaesth. 1983;57:120–130. [PubMed]
111. von Lubitz DKJE, Marangos PJ. Cerebral ischemia in gerbils: postischemic administration of cyclohexyladenosine and 8-sulphophenyl-theophylline. J. Mol. Neurosci. 1990;2:53–59. [PubMed]
112. Rudolphi KA, Keil M, Fastbom J, Fredholm BB. Ischaemic damage in gerbil hippocampus is reduced following upregulation of adenosine A1 receptors by caffeine treatment. Neurosci. Lett. 1989;103:275–280. [PubMed]
113. von Lubitz DKJE, Paul IA, Jacobson KA. Effects of N6-cyclopentyl adenosine and 8-cyclopentyl-1,3 dipropylxanthine on N-methyl-d-aspartate induced seizures in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1993;249:265–270. [PubMed]
114. von Lubitz DKJE, Paul IA, Bartus RT, Jacobson KA. Effects of chronic administration of adenosine A1 receptor agonist and antagonist on spatial learning and memory. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1993;249:271–280. [PubMed]
115. von Lubitz DKJE, Paul IA, Ji X-D, Carter M, Jacobson KA. Chronic adenosine A1 receptor agonist and antagonist: effect on receptor density and N-methyl-d-aspartate induced seizures in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1994;253:95–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
116. Georgiev V, Johansson B, Fredholm BB. Long-term caffeine treatment leads to decreased susceptibility to NMDA-induced clonic seizures in mice without changes in adenosine A1 receptor number. Brain Res. 1993;612:271–277. [PubMed]
117. Magistretti PJ, Hoff PR, Martin JL. Adenosine stimulates glycogenolysis in mouse cerebral cortex: a possible coupling mechanism between neuronal activity and energy metabolism. J. Neurosci. 1986;6:2558–2562. [PubMed]
118. Bourke RS, Kimelberg HK, Daze MA. Effects of inhibitors and adenosine on (HCO–/CO2) stimulated swelling and Cl– in brain slices and cultured astrocytes. Brain Res. 1978;154:196–202. [PubMed]
119. Phillis JW. Adenosine metabolites may provide a primary source of oxygen free radicals in ischemic/reperfused rat brain. Drug. Dev. Res. 1994;31:308.
120. Parsons WJ, Stiles GL. Heterologous desensitization of inhibitory adenosine A1 receptor adenylate cyclase system in rat adipocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 1987;262:841–847. [PubMed]
121. Ramkumar V, Stiles GL, Beaven MA, Ali H., Jr. The A3 adenosine receptor is the unique adenosine receptor which facilitates release of allergic mediators in mast cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:16887–16890. [PubMed]
122. Shi D, Nikodijević O, Jacobson KA, Daly JW. Chronic caffeine alters the density of adenosine, adrenergic, cholinergic, GABA, and serotonin receptors and calcium channels in mouse brain. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 1993;13:247–261. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
123. Longbaugh JP, Didsbury J, Spiegel A, Stiles G. Modification of the rat adipocyte A1 adenosine receptor-adenylate cyclase system during chronic exposure to an A1 receptor agonist: alterations in the quantity of GSα and GIα are not associated with changes in their mRNAs. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. (Mol. Pharmacol.) 1989;36:681–688. [PubMed]