PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
 
J Biol Chem. 2012 August 24; 287(35): 29516–29528.
Published online 2012 July 2. doi:  10.1074/jbc.M111.335943
PMCID: PMC3436132

MicroRNA-9 Inhibition of Cell Proliferation and Identification of Novel miR-9 Targets by Transcriptome Profiling in Breast Cancer Cells*An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpg

Abstract

Although underexpression of miR-9 in cancer cells is reported in many cancer types, it is currently difficult to classify miR-9 as a tumor suppressor or an oncomir. We demonstrate that miR-9 expression is down-regulated in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells compared with MCF-10-2A normal breast cell line. Increasing miR-9 expression levels in breast cancer cells induced anti-proliferative, anti-invasive, and pro-apoptotic activity. In addition, microarray profiling of the transcriptome of MCF-7 cells overexpressing miR-9 identified six novel direct miR-9 targets (AP3B1, CCNG1, LARP1, MTHFD1L, MTHFD2, and SRPK1). Among these, MTHFD2 was identified as a miR-9 target gene that affects cell proliferation. Knockdown of MTHFD2 mimicked the effect observed when miR-9 was overexpressed by decreasing cell viability and increasing apoptotic activity. Despite variable effects on different cell lines, proliferative and anti-apoptotic activity of MTHFD2 was demonstrated whereby it could escape from miR-9-directed suppression (by overexpression of MTHFD2 with mutated miR-9 binding sites). Furthermore, endogenous expression levels of miR-9 and MTHFD2 displayed inverse expression profiles in primary breast tumor samples compared with normal breast samples; miR-9 was down-regulated, and MTHFD2 was up-regulated. These results indicate anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity of miR-9 and that direct targeting of MTHFD2 can contribute to tumor suppressor-like activity of miR-9 in breast cancer cells.

Keywords: Breast Cancer, Microarray, MicroRNA, Oncogene, Tumor Suppressor Gene, MTHFD2, Breast Cancer, miR-9, MicroRNA-9

Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs)3 are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. They mediate fundamental cellular processes such as differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis and are actively involved in carcinogenesis (1, 2). Dysregulation of miRNAs can contribute to tumorigenesis (3), and miRNA expression patterns can classify tumor subtypes (4). Several miRNAs have been experimentally validated to function as oncomirs (57) or tumor suppressor miRNAs (8, 9). MiR-9, initially shown to function in neurogenesis (10), is recently implicated in cancer. Although most evidence indicates tumor suppressor activity for miR-9 in cancer cells (11), conflicting findings exist (12). Currently it is difficult to classify miR-9 as a tumor suppressor miRNA or an oncomir. For example, miR-9 is overexpressed in brain tumors (13) and induced by MYC in breast cancer cells enhancing metastasis (12, 14), and knockdown of miR-9 decreased invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells (15), all of which is indicative of an oncogenic potential. Conversely, in gastric cancer tissues miR-9 was shown to be down-regulated (16). Decreased expression of miR-9 has also been reported in gastric adenocarcinoma (17), ovarian cancer (11, 18), and in malignant mesothelioma (19). Moreover, epigenetic inactivation of the miR-9 gene has been shown in breast cancer (20, 21), colorectal cancer (22), renal cell carcinoma (23), and several other cancer cell lines and tumor tissues (24), all of which is indicative of a tumor suppressor potential. To date, few miR-9 targets of relevance to cancer have been experimentally validated (25, 26): CBX7 in human glioma (27), CDX2 in gastric cancer (28), NFKB1 in ovarian cancer (18) and in gastric adenocarcinoma (17), and E-cadherin when induced by MYC (29). It remains unclear how miR-9 contributes to cancer cell growth or how cancer transcriptomes respond to loss/gain of miR-9 expression. This study investigates the effects of miR-9 overexpression on cancer cell growth and apoptosis and further identifies global changes and novel direct targets in the transcriptome of the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line using a microarray profiling approach. We demonstrate that several cancer-associated genes are responsive to miR-9 overexpression and that miR-9 directly targets AP3B1, CCNG1, LARP1, MTHFD1L, MTHFD2, and SRPK1 post-transcriptionally. We also demonstrate that targeting MTHFD2 can be partially responsible for the anti-proliferative activity of miR-9 in breast cancer cells.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Patient Samples and Cell Lines

Primary tumor (n = 16) and normal breast (n = 14) samples were obtained from patients at National University of Ireland Galway University hospital (supplemental Table 3). Human breast adenocarcinoma cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 were cultured as previously described (30), and normal breast epithelial cell line MCF-10-2A was cultured based on ATCC recommendations.

Constructs and Transfections

For the microarray experiments, synthetic oligonucleotides (pre-9 and pre-ctr) (Applied Biosystems) were transfected at two dosages: 12.5 nm (1×) and 25 nm (2×) final concentrations. For all other experiments, a final concentration of 50 nm was used. siRNAs for AP3B1, MTHFD1L, MTHFD2, and siControl (Qiagen) were used in final 5 nm concentrations. The methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NADP+-dependent) 2 (MTHFD2) ORF construct pCMV-MTHFD2-UTR (with full-length 3′-UTR) (Origene) was used as the wild type construct, and pCMV-AC (Origene) vector was used as the empty vector (EV) control. A construct with mutated miR-9 binding sites on 3′-UTR was generated (QuikChange Lightning kit, Agilent Technologies) designated as pCMV-MTHFD2-UTRmut. One μg of each plasmid (or EV control) and pre-9 (or pre-ctr) oligonucleotide was co-transfected into MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-10-2A cells in 6-well plates using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent according to manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen).

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA and small RNAs were isolated using Nucleospin miRNA kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany) and reverse-transcribed using a RevertAid H-Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Fermentas). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using SYBR Green assays (ABI), and the reaction was run in a CFX96 system (Bio-Rad). β-Actin and GAPDH were used as housekeeping controls. qRT-PCR analysis of miR-9 and RNU6B (housekeeping control) were conducted using Taqman miRNA assays (Applied Biosystems). Relative quantification of expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method in CFX96 system software. A t test was used to determine statistical significance.

Microarray Profiling and Data Analysis

RNA integrity number (RIN) was measured using Bioanalyzer (Agilent), and good quality samples (RIN > 8) were processed for hybridization into whole human genome Illumina bead arrays (Illumina) in biological triplicates (Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute microarray core facility). All data were variance-stabilizing-transformed and robust spline-normalized using the lumi package (Bioconductor). Differentially expressed genes were identified using LIMMA (p < 0.05, signal log ratio >1.2). Putative microRNA targets were identified using MAMI microRNA target meta-predictor and TargetScan. MiR-9 seed region enrichment was identified using Sylamer. Enrichment analysis was performed using conditional hypergeometric tests.

Western Blot and Antibodies

Cells were washed with PBS and lysed in protein lysis buffer (0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% deoxycholate in PBS). Methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NADP+ dependent) 1-like (MTHFD1L) protein (localized to mitochondria) was isolated using a mitochondria isolation kit (Thermo Scientific) followed by lysis using RIPA (31). Proteins were quantified (Bradford Assay, Bio-Rad), and 30 μg of each protein was separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane. Blots were blocked in 5% milk, TBS, Tween-20. The following antibodies were used: primary antibodies (1:500–1000 dilution) anti-AP3B1 (#GTX113878S), anti-MTHFD2 (#GTX115482S) (GeneTex), anti-MTHFD1L (32), anti-CCNG1 (#AP11209b) (Abgent), anti-SRPK1 (#H00006732-A01) (Abnova), and anti-β-Actin (#A9169) and secondary antibodies (1:10,000 dilution) anti-rabbit (#A9169) and anti-mouse (#A0168) (Sigma). Immunodetection was performed using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL Plus Kit, PerkinElmer Life Sciences) and visualized in G:Box Chemi imaging system (Syngene).

Cell Viability and Caspase-3/7 Assays

For viability, cytotoxicity, and caspase-3/7 analyses, cells were grown in 96-well plates and 48 h post-transfection of overexpression constructs or oligonucleotides, ApoTox-Glo Triplex Assay was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Promega). This assay detects fluorogenic, cell-permanent peptide substrate (GF-AFC) for live-cell protease activity and cell-impermanent, fluorogenic peptide substrate (bis-AAF-R110) for dead-cell protease activity, resulting in ratiometric, inversely correlated measures of cell viability, and cytotoxicity. Each well is normalized as live/dead cells, making results comparable (well-to-well, plate-to-plate, and day-to-day) as the ratio of viable cells to dead cells is independent of cell number. This followed the addition of luminogenic DEVD-peptide substrate for caspase-3/7 and Ultra-Glo™ Recombinant Thermostable Luciferase onto cells. The luminescence output was measured with a luminometer. One μm staurosporine treatment for 3 h was used as a positive control for apoptosis induction (33) to confirm the accuracy of the assay.

Wound Healing and Invasion Assays

Cells were grown to full confluence, transfected with pre-9 or pre-ctr, and wounded by a sterile pipette tip. Images of the cells were taken under an inverted microscope at 0, 24, and 48 h time points after wounding. For invasion, after transfections, 2.5 × 104 MCF-7 or MDA-MB-231 cells (in serum starving medium; 0.1% FBS DMEM) were transferred into invasion chambers (BD Biosciences), fixed, and stained according to manufacturer's protocol. The images of invaded and stained cells were taken from an inverted microscope and counted.

Luciferase Reporter Assay

Full-length 3′-UTR reporter constructs for AP3B1, CCNG1, MTHFD1L, MTHFD2, LARP1, and SRPK1 were obtained from Switchgear Genomics. Constructs containing mutated miR-9 seed binding site were generated (QuikChange Lightning kit, Agilent Technologies). Each 3′-UTR or mutated 3′-UTR construct (100 ng) was co-transfected with pre-9 or pre-ctr synthetic oligonucleotides (50 nm) in 24-well plates. 48 h post-transfection, LightSwitch luciferase assay solution (Switchgear Genomics) was added onto cells and incubated for 30 min at room temperature, and luminescence was read for 2 s in luminometer plate reader. Log 2 ratios of targeting/non-targeting microRNA (pre-9/pre-ctr) luciferase activity for each construct were plotted.

RESULTS

Increasing miR-9 Levels Leads to a Decrease in Cell Viability and an Increase in Apoptosis in MCF-7 Cells

Quantitative analysis (Taqman qRT-PCR) of miR-9 expression levels in breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 and normal epithelial breast cell line MCF-10-2A indicated lower levels of miR-9 in cancer cell lines compared with MCF-10-2A (Fig. 1A). The effect of miR-9 overexpression on tumor cell growth was investigated. MiR-9 expression levels could be increased up to 250-fold in the pre-9 synthetic oligonucleotide-transfected MCF-7 cells compared with pre-ctr (scrambled control)-transfected cells (Fig. 1B). MiR-9-overexpressing cells led to decreased viability and increased caspase-7 activity as an indicator of apoptosis (Fig. 1C). Although staurosporine treatment did not cause a significant change in the viability of the MCF-7 cells, it was sufficient to increase caspase-7 activity as a positive control of apoptosis (Fig. 1C). MCF-7 cells lack caspase-3 (34), and previous reports indicate that activation of caspase-7 occurs independent of caspase-3 in MCF-7 cells (35, 36). Hence, similar to staurosporine treatment effects observed, in the miR-9 overexpression (pre-9) caspase-7 activity was increased compared with control (pre-ctr), indicating caspase-3 independent caspase-7 activation in MCF-7 cells (Fig. 1C). In addition to anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects, miR-9-overexpressing MCF-7 cells (pre-9) had slower motility (wound healing) compared with control (pre-ctr) (Fig. 1D). To further examine the phenotypic effects of miR-9 overexpression on breast cancer cells, the invasion of MCF-7 (non-invasive, ER+) and MDA-MB-231 (highly invasive, ER−) cells was tested after miR-9 overexpression. No cell invasion was observed in MCF-7 cells. However, miR-9 overexpression (pre-9) significantly decreased the invasiveness of the highly invasive cell line MDA-MB-231 compared with control (pre-ctr) treatments (Fig. 1E).

FIGURE 1.
Effects of miR-9 overexpression on cell viability, apoptosis, migration, and invasion. Taqman qRT-PCR analysis of miR-9 in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines and MCF-10-2A normal breast cell lines, represented as normalized relative expression ...

Genome-wide Effects of miR-9 Overexpression on MCF-7 Transcriptome

To determine the global effects of miR-9 overexpression on the transcriptome of MCF-7 breast cancer cells, microarray profiling was performed. MiR-9 was delivered at two dosages, designated 1× and 2×. Quantitative analysis of miR-9 before the microarray analysis showed that the overexpression of miR-9 by providing a 2× dosage of the microRNA (pre-9) did not increase intracellular levels by 2-fold. However, there was a significant increase in miR-9 levels up to 1.5-fold compared with the 1× microRNA dosage (data not shown). Differentially expressed genes were identified for the 1× and 2× treatments separately (compared with their corresponding controls). A total of 516 differentially expressed genes were identified in miR-9 overexpressing MCF-7 cells compared with controls (p < 0.05, signal log ratio >log 2 1.2). Among these, 145 differentially expressed genes were specific to 1× dosage, and 121 genes were specific to 2× dosage treatments. 250 genes were commonly differentially expressed in 1× and 2× (124 up-regulated and 126 down-regulated). There was no relationship observed between -fold changes and dosages in the common differentially expressed genes, with both dosages displaying approximately the same -fold change differences (supplemental Fig. S1), possibly due to saturation of miR-9 overexpression levels. Furthermore, a direct comparison of 1× (pre-9) versus 2× (pre-9) was performed that identified no differential expression, indicating no observable dosage effect.

Down-regulated Genes Responsive to miR-9 Overexpression Are Enriched with miR-9 Seed Region Binding Sequences

To identify enrichment of miR-9 seed region, binding sites in the 3′-UTRs of differentially expressed genes Sylamer (SylArray) (37, 38) analysis was performed. Briefly, all genes on the microarray were first ranked based by t-statistic. Sylamer detected significantly over- and under-represented words in the 3′-UTRs of the ranked list of genes. Results showed significant enrichment (p value < 1 × 10−15) for canonical miR-9 seeds (6-, 7-, and 8-mer) in down-regulated genes in both dosages; 7-mer enrichment is shown (Fig. 2A). Analysis of all the differentially expressed genes (union of 1× and 2×; 516 genes) in the MAMI microRNA meta-predictor identified predicted miR-9 targets (41 down-regulated and 6 up-regulated) (Fig. 2B). The specific effects of direct miR-9 targeting are highlighted by the enrichment of miR-9 seed region binding sites in the 3′-UTRs of genes observed to be down-regulated, indicating that the post-transcriptional regulatory role of miR-9 likely involves the direct targeting of multiple genes. 25 differentially expressed genes (19 down-regulated and 6 up-regulated genes) were selected for further analysis based on genes classified for enriched cancer-related GO terms (e.g. cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell death) (supplemental Table 1) or those that are predicted targets and displayed the greatest extreme in differential expression (independent of the GO term, based on lowest p values) including 13 predicted targets of miR-9 (12 down-regulated, 1 up-regulated) (supplemental Table 2). The differential regulation of 25 genes (19 down-regulated and 6 up-regulated) including NFKB1 as a known miR-9 target (18) in response to miR-9 overexpression was confirmed by SYBR Green qRT-PCR for pre-9-treated samples compared with pre-ctr (t test; p < 0.05) (Fig. 2C).

FIGURE 2.
Microarray profiling of miR-9 overexpression in MCF-7 cells and qRT-PCR validation of differentially expressed genes. A, shown is a landscape plot of Sylamer analysis for miR-9 seed (7-mer; 1A and 2) enrichment in down-regulated genes is shown. Colored ...

Identification of Six Novel Targets of miR-9

In most instances microRNAs negatively regulate gene expression (i.e. reduce levels of mRNAs/proteins) (39, 40). From the validated (down-regulated) predicted targets, AP3B1, CCNG1, LARP1, MTHFD1L, MTHFD2, and SRPK1 were tested for direct miR-9 targeting using a 3′-UTR luciferase-based reporter system (where one luciferase construct would contain a wild type 3′-UTR while the other construct contains a disruption of the seed region of the miR-9 binding site) (Fig. 3A). CCNG1, MTHFD2, LARP1, and SRPK1 were selected on the basis of their previous implications in breast cancer (4144), whereas AP3B1 and MTHFD1L were selected as potential biomarkers. All of these genes were predicted to have one miR-9 binding site, except MTHFD2, which has two predicted miR-9 binding sites (Fig. 3A). All the predicted sites are annotated as conserved except for the miR-9 binding site in SRPK1, which is poorly conserved (TargetScan Release 5.2 June 2011) (Fig. 3A). For the luciferase reporter analysis, in addition to construction of 3′-UTR constructs where wild type miR-9 binding occurs, site-directed mutations in the miR-9 seed region in full-length 3′-UTRs were introduced (MUT UTR) to perturb miR-9 binding. For all the six genes tested, the wild type 3′-UTR (WT UTR) constructs displayed significant (p < 0.001) down-regulation in luciferase activity when co-transfected with pre-9 (normalized to pre-ctr) (Fig. 3B) in MCF-7 cells. In contrast, in the mutated 3′-UTR constructs (MUT UTR) luciferase activity was restored significantly, confirming the functionality of miR-9 binding sites in the 3′-UTR of these genes (Fig. 3B). In addition, the effect of miR-9 binding was also tested at the protein level for all six genes, which indicated miR-9 overexpression-induced reductions in protein levels for AP3B1, CCNG1, LARP1, MTHFD1L, MTHFD2, and SRPK1 (Fig. 3C). Because MTHFD2 3′-UTR contains two putative miR-9 binding sites and there is no detailed research reported on its activity in cancer cells, we focused on identification of the effects of MTHFD2 on three cell lines: MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 (breast cancer), and MCF-10-2A (normal breast) (see supplemental Fig. S2 for all the MCF-10-2A results). In addition to MCF-7 cells (Fig. 3B), luciferase assay for MTHFD2 3′-UTR was also performed in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-10-2A cells. In MCF-10-2A cells, despite the decreased luciferase activity in wild type construct (WT), the mutated construct (MUT) displayed no significant restoration of luciferase activity (supplemental Fig. S2A). However, a slight suppression at mRNA and protein levels of MTHFD2 was observed upon miR-9 overexpression in MCF-10-2A cells (supplemental Fig. S2B). In contrast, in MDA-MB-231 cells, the wild type construct (WT UTR) displayed lower luciferase activity, whereas mutated construct (MUT UTR) restored the luciferase activity significantly (Fig. 3D), suggesting that miR-9; MTHFD2 regulatory interaction occurs in two different breast cancer cell lines. The suppressive effect of miR-9 on MTHFD2 in MDA-MB-231 cells was also confirmed at mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 3E). Overall, these results indicate that AP3B1, CCNG1, LARP1, MTHFD1L, MTHFD2, and SRPK1 are direct targets of miR-9, negatively regulated by miR-9 at the mRNA and protein levels.

FIGURE 3.
Luciferase analysis of miR-9 predicted targets. A, binding sites of miR-9 on the 3′-UTR of six predicted targets (TargetScan) (AP3B1, CCNG1, LARP1, MTHFD1L, MTHFD2, and SRPK1) and mutated miR-9 seed regions in mutant 3′-UTR constructs ...

Depletion of the miR-9 Target MTHFD2 Recapitulates the Anti-proliferative Effect of miR-9 Overexpression in MCF-7 Cells

To test whether the anti-proliferative effect of miR-9 overexpression is due to down-regulation of its identified targets, siRNA knockdowns were performed for three genes, AP3B1, MTHFD1L, and MTHFD2, followed by viability and caspase-3/7 activity analyses. Successful knockdown in MCF-7 cells was confirmed for AP3B1 and MTHFD1L by qRT-PCR (supplemental Fig. S3A). The viability of siMTHFD1L-transfected MCF-7 cells was significantly decreased, whereas the siAP3B1-transfected cells showed no significant change in viability compared with the siControl (supplemental Fig. S3B). Analysis of caspase-3/7 activity indicated no significant change in siAP3B1- and siMTHFD1L-transfected MCF-7 cells compared with siControl (supplemental Fig. S3B). The knockdown of MTHFD2 (siMTHFD2) was performed in three cell lines: MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-10-2A. In MCF-10-2A cells successful knockdown was confirmed at the mRNA level (supplemental Fig. S2C). The viability displayed no significant change; however, caspase-3/7 activation was significantly (p = 0.01) increased in the siMTHFD2-transfected MCF-10-2A cells (supplemental Fig. S2D). Successful knockdown of MTHFD2 in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells was confirmed at mRNA (Fig. 4A) and protein levels (Fig. 4B). In MCF-7 cells, the viability was decreased (p = 0.03) and caspase-3/7 activity was increased (p = 0.003) upon MTHFD2 knockdown (siMTHFD2) (Fig. 4C). There was no significant change in the viability or caspase-3/7 activity in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 4C). However, MDA-MB-231 cells displayed reduced invasiveness (Fig. 4C) upon MTHFD2 knockdown, suggesting that MTHFD2 contributes to promoting invasiveness. These results indicate that (while displaying variable effects in different cell lines) MTHFD2 knockdown (siMTHFD2) can recapitulate the anti-proliferative, anti-invasive, and pro-apoptotic activity of mir-9 overexpression (pre-9) (Fig. 1).

FIGURE 4.
Knockdown effects of MTHFD2. A, shown is relative expression analysis (qRT-PCR) of MTHFD2. B, shown is Western blot analysis of MTHFD2 protein in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells at 48 h post-transfection of siRNAs (siMTHFD2 or siControl). C, shown is viability ...

Overexpression of MTHFD2 with Mutated miR-9 Binding Sites Displays Proliferative Activity

To test for opposite effects to those observed in MTHFD2 knockdown and to identify the contribution of miR-9-directed regulation on the potential oncogenic activity of MTHFD2, overexpression constructs for MTHFD2 with wild type 3′-UTR (pCMV-MTHFD2-UTR) or 3′-UTR with mutated miR-9 binding sites (pCMV-MTHFD2-UTRmut) or empty vector control (pCMV-AC,EV) (Fig. 5A) were transfected in MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-10-2A cells. The overexpression of MTHFD2 (via both wild type 3′-UTR and mutated 3′-UTR) was detected at mRNA and/or protein levels in all the cells (Fig. 5, A and B) (supplemental Fig. S2E for MCF-10-2A). The MCF-10-2A cells ectopically overexpressing miR-9 (pre-9) and MTHFD2 with mutated miR-9 binding sites (UTRmut) displayed higher MTHFD2 expression that may indicate the escape of MTHFD2 from miR-9-directed suppression due to the mutated binding sites. However, the viability and caspase-3/7 activity displayed no significant change upon MTHFD2 overexpression (supplemental Fig. S2F). In contrast, despite the similar ectopic expression profile of MTHFD2 in UTR- or UTRmut-transfected samples, both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells displayed significantly greater viability and reduced apoptosis when MTHFD2 was overexpressed with mutated miR-9 binding sites (UTRmut) (Fig. 5C). These findings highlight the significant contribution of miR-9-directed regulation on reducing the proliferative and anti-apoptotic capacity of MTHFD2. Furthermore, compared with control (EV), the invasiveness of MDA-MB-231 cells was increased when MTHFD2 was overexpressed with wild type 3′-UTR (UTR) (Fig. 5C), and this effect was greater (i.e. more invasiveness) when MTHFD2 was overexpressed with ablated miR-9 binding sites (UTRmut) (Fig. 5C), indicating that miR-9-directed regulation can limit the pro-invasive potential of MTHFD2.

FIGURE 5.
Overexpression effects of MTHFD2. A, linear maps of pCMV empty vector control (EV) and MTHFD2 overexpression constructs pCMV-MTHFD2-UTR (wild type 3′-UTR), pCMV-MTHFD2-UTRmut (3′-UTR with mutated miR-9 binding sites) and relative expression ...

MiR-9 and MTHFD2 Show Inverse Expression Levels in Primary Breast Cancer Samples

To test whether miR-9 and MTHFD2 expression levels are inversely correlated in clinical cancer samples, expression levels of miR-9 and MTHFD2 in 30 samples (16 primary breast cancer samples (8 non-metastatic tumor and 8 metastatic tumor) and 14 normal breast samples) were analyzed. The relative -fold changes of miR-9 and MTHFD2 in tumor samples were normalized against the mean expression of normal breast tissue samples, which were set to one and are presented as relative-fold changes (log 2 ± S.E.) (Fig. 6A). In six of eight non-metastatic samples, miR-9 and MTHFD2 showed an inverse expression profile, whereas in metastatic samples the trend was less obvious; three of eight samples showed an inverse expression profile. Furthermore, two publically available datasets, Richardson_breast_2 (n = 47) (45) and Zhao_breast (n = 64) (46), available through the OncomineTM data base (v4.4 Compendia Bioscience, Ann Arbor, MI) (47), confirmed higher expression levels of MTHFD2 in breast tumor samples compared with normal breast tissue (Fig. 6B). This is consistent with increased MTHFD2 expression levels in breast cancer that was recently reported in a proteomics study with 21T breast cancer cell lines (derived from a single patient with metastatic breast cancer) (42).

FIGURE 6.
MTHFD2 and miR-9 expression in primary breast tumor samples. A, relative expression analysis (qRT-PCR) of MTHFD2 and miR-9 (Taqman qRT-PCR) in primary breast tumor samples (n = 16; non-metastatic tumor samples #1–8 and metastatic tumor samples ...

DISCUSSION

The role of miR-9 in cancer biology is not well understood. This study demonstrates that endogenous miR-9 levels are lower in breast cancer cells compared with normal cells. It also provides evidence of direct miR-9 targets previously implicated in cancer. Although miR-9 overexpression has been associated with colorectal cancer metastasis (48), its significant down-regulation in gastric and clear cell renal carcinomas (16, 23) has also been reported. These conflicting findings on miR-9 expression (down-regulation or overexpression in cancer cells) may be due to differential mature miR-9 processing from three different primary precursors where down-regulation of miR-9 due to aberrant hypermethylation of any of the miR-9-1, miR-9-2, and miR-9-3 precursor regions have been reported in independent studies in different cancer types (23, 24, 49). Our findings that endogenous miR-9 levels are lower in breast cancer cells compared with normal cells (for both cell lines and primary tumor samples) is similar to previous reports of lower levels of miR-9 associated with ovarian cancer, gastric carcinoma, and clear cell renal carcinomas (16, 23).

Changes in cell proliferation and apoptosis are key phenotypes observed in malignant transformation (50). Our results demonstrate that miR-9 overexpression decreases cell viability and increases apoptosis in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. As a caspase-3 null cell line (51), previous studies have shown that DEVDase activity can be increased in MCF-7 cells independent of caspase-3 whereby caspase-7 cleaves DEVD substituting caspase-3 (35, 5254). In this study caspase-7 activity was increased, indicating pro-apoptotic activity of miR-9 in MCF-7 cells. The anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of miR-9 are supportive of a tumor suppressor-like role of miR-9 in the context of breast cancer cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis.

Invasiveness is one of the hallmarks of cancer (55). Overexpression of some miRNAs (e.g. miR-21) has been shown to increase the invasiveness of normal and cancer cells (56, 57). In some instances non-invasive cells can be transformed into invasive cells, whereas in other cases the invasiveness of a cell can be increased due to changes in the expression levels of specific miRNAs (or genes) (58, 59). Although our study demonstrates no effect of miR-9 overexpression on the invasiveness of the non-invasive MCF-7 cell line, the overexpression of miR-9 elicited a significant reduction in the invasiveness of the highly invasive MDA-MB-231 cell line. The lack of invasion observed in MCF-7 cells could be due to the poorly invasive nature of MCF-7 cells (60). The reduction of invasion observed in the MDA-MB-231 cell line could be due to miR-9-directed down-regulation or inactivation of pro-invasive genes and indicates that miR-9 levels can affect invasiveness. Although miR-9 has been implicated in cancer biology in several studies, no genome-wide transcriptome analysis of miR-9 expression effects in cancer cells has been reported to date. This study demonstrates that miR-9 overexpression in breast cancer cells in two dosages (1× and 2×) identifies 250 genes whose expression levels are responsive to miR-9, including 47 predicted miR-9 targets. The cancer relevance of miR-9-induced effects on the MCF-7 transcriptome is highlighted by cancer-related GO terms (e.g. cell proliferation, apoptosis) being enriched in the genes differentially regulated.

The identification of predicted miR-9 target genes displaying reduced expression levels in MCF-7 cells when miR-9 is overexpressed suggests such genes are potential direct targets of miR-9. This study identifies and validates six genes as novel direct miR-9 targets, including five targets with previously identified roles in cancer (AP3B1, CCNG1, LARP1, MTHFD2, and SRPK1) and one target that was not previously implicated in cancer (MTHFD1L) in MCF-7 cells. MTHFD2 was tested also in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-10-2A cells and confirmed as a direct target of miR-9 in MDA-MB-231 cells in addition to MCF-7. Interestingly, in MCF-10-2A cells luciferase activity remained suppressed in the construct with mutated miR-9 binding sites, indicating no significant miR-9 contribution on MTHFD2 suppression in these cells, which may be a result of different cellular context in combination with other regulatory relationships.

For CCNG1, LARP1, and SRPK1, a functional role in cancer has been previously reported by knockdown experiments. CCNG1 (cyclin-G1), a p53 target, has been implicated in cancer (41, 6164), and silencing of CCNG1 displayed decreased cell growth rate and invasion in hepatocarcinoma cells (61). LARP1 (La ribonucleoprotein domain family, member 1), functions in vesicle transport. Silencing of LARP1 increased apoptosis in HeLa cells (43). SRPK1 (SRSF protein kinase 1) functions in alternative splicing and has been implicated in many cancer types (44, 6568). Silencing of SRPK1 increased apoptotic potential in breast and colonic tumor cell lines (44) and decreased proliferative capacity in leukemic cells (69). The observed reduction in mRNA and protein levels highlights that due to direct targeting by miR-9, and the reduced activity of these oncogenic targets can potentially lead to suppression of tumorigenesis.

In addition, our study also provides the first knockdown experiments for three additional direct targets of miR-9, namely AP3B1, MTHFD1L, and MTHFD2. We considered that the lack of experimental evidence of loss-of-function effects of these genes on cancer cells made them good candidates to investigate their possible involvement in breast carcinogenesis using a siRNA approach. AP3B1 (AP-3 complex subunit beta-1), involved in organelle biogenesis, has been investigated in relation to cancer in only a few studies (70, 71). MTHFD1L has been previously implicated in neural tube defects (72). MTHFD2, a mitochondrial bifunctional enzyme, is known to involve in folate metabolism (73), and loss- or gain-of function studies have not been described yet. A possible link between MTHFD2 and cancer, such as a SNP in MTHFD2 associated with increased risk of bladder cancer (74), and a correlation of MTHFD2 expression with artesunate resistance in tumor cell lines (75) have been reported.

The individual effects of knockdown of MTHFD1L and AP3B1 showed only a small 15% decrease in viability in MCF-7 cells. In contrast, the knockdown of MTHFD2 significantly decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, mimicking the phenotypic effect of miR-9 overexpression. Apart from the significant increase in caspase-3/7 activation in MCF-10-2A cells, no significant effect was observed in viability of MCF-10-2A cells or viability and caspase-3/7 activity of MDA-MB-231 cells after MTHFD2 knockdown. Similar findings indicating that overexpression or knockdown of a gene may not have an impact on cell proliferation but can affect cancer cell invasion have been described (76). Although the extent of the effect of MTHFD2 knockdown may not completely account for the overall extent of the phenotypic effects of miR-9, it is clear that knockdown of MTHFD2 can contribute to the phenotypic effects as seen for miR-9 overexpression in MCF-7 cells.

The overexpression of MTHFD2 with the wild type (UTR) or mutated (UTRmut) miR-9 binding sites displayed similar expression levels. MTHFD2 overexpression with mutated miR-9 binding sites (UTRmut) could be expected to display higher MTHFD2 levels due to “escaping” from miR-9-directed suppression. In the UTR-transfected cells ectopically expressed miR-9 can target both endogenous and ectopically introduced MTHFD2, whereas in UTRmut-transfected cells miR-9 can only target endogenous MTHFD2. We consider that due to high endogenous levels of MTHFD2, ectopically expressed miR-9 can still be captured by the endogenous MTHFD2, resulting in overall similar MTHFD2 expression compared with UTRmut. Potentially, much greater miR-9 ectopic expression in UTR-transfected cells should be sufficient for suppression of both endogenous and ectopically expressed MTHFD2, resulting in less MTHFD2 expression compared with UTRmut-transfected cells. MTHFD2 overexpression with wild type 3′-UTR (UTR) had no effect on viability or apoptosis compared with EV control. In contrast, MTHFD2 lacking miR-9 binding sites (UTRmut) displayed increased viability and decreased apoptosis. This effect may indicate that the escape of MTHFD2 from miR-9-directed suppression potentiates its anti-proliferative activity. Indeed, the increased invasiveness observed for MDA-MB-231 cells during wild type MTHFD2 3′-UTR (UTR) overexpression and the highest invasiveness observed with MTHFD2-mutated 3′-UTR (UTRmut) highlight a contribution of miR-9 in balancing MTHFD2 levels (via suppression) to reduce invasiveness. Overall, the results suggest that, despite the variable effects of MTHFD2 on cell viability, apoptosis, and invasion, the decreased MTHFD2 levels may be partially responsible for the effects observed during miR-9 overexpression in MCF-7 cells. In addition, MTHFD2 escape of the miR-9-directed suppression (3′-UTR with no miR-9 binding sites) leads to a trend toward proliferative, anti-apoptotic, and pro-invasive activity, indicating that miR-9-directed MTHFD2 regulation is a contributor to anti-proliferative activity of miR-9.

The results in our study suggest a tumor suppressor-like activity of miR-9 when ectopically expressed in breast cancer cells. Moreover, transcriptome profiling of miR-9 overexpression identifies six novel direct targets of miR-9, including MTHFD2 (which when subject to knockdown recapitulated the anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity of miR-9 overexpression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells). Furthermore, overexpression of MTHFD2-escaping miR-9 regulation suggests that miR-9 contributes to suppression of the potential oncogenic activity of MTHFD2. Taken together, our study highlights underexpression of miR-9 and overexpression of MTHFD2 in breast tumor tissues as potential expression level biomarkers. The expression levels of MTHFD2 can be controlled (down-regulated) via increasing miR-9 expression in cancer cells, thereby reducing cell viability and enhancing apoptosis. In addition to the individual and negatively correlated expression profiles of miR-9 and MTHFD2, the interaction between miR-9 and MTHFD2 is significant in breast cancer cells and next will be subjected to further screening in population-size sample groups and possibly in combination with other miRNAs, which display promise as targets for breast cancer diagnosis and therapeutics.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data:

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Howard Fearnhead (National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland) for providing MDA-MB-231 cell line, Prof. Rosemary O'Connor (UCC, Ireland) for MCF-7 and MCF-10-2A cell lines, Dr. Roisin M. Dwyer (National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland) for primary tumor samples, Dr. Sarah Blagden (Imperial College, UK) for LARP1, and Dr. Anne-Parle McDermott (DCU, Ireland) for MTHFD1L antibodies.

*This work was supported by The Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering, and Technology, Cancer Research Ireland, Thomas Crawford Hayes Trust Fund (National University of Ireland Galway), and the Health Research Board, Ireland.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpgThis article contains supplemental Tables S1–S3 and Figs. S1–S3.

The microarray data have been deposited at NCBI/GEO, accession number GSE33952.

3The abbreviations used are:

miRNA
microRNA
EV
empty vector
MTHFD1L
methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NADP+ dependent) 1-like
qRT
quantitative real-time.

REFERENCES

1. Schickel R., Boyerinas B., Park S. M., Peter M. E. (2008) MicroRNAs. Key players in the immune system, differentiation, tumorigenesis, and cell death. Oncogene 27, 5959–5974 [PubMed]
2. Zhang B., Pan X., Cobb G. P., Anderson T. A. (2007) MicroRNAs as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Dev. Biol. 302, 1–12 [PubMed]
3. He L., Thomson J. M., Hemann M. T., Hernando-Monge E., Mu D., Goodson S., Powers S., Cordon-Cardo C., Lowe S. W., Hannon G. J., Hammond S. M. (2005) A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene. Nature 435, 828–833 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Lu J., Getz G., Miska E. A., Alvarez-Saavedra E., Lamb J., Peck D., Sweet-Cordero A., Ebert B. L., Mak R. H., Ferrando A. A., Downing J. R., Jacks T., Horvitz H. R., Golub T. R. (2005) MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature 435, 834–838 [PubMed]
5. Ma L., Teruya-Feldstein J., Weinberg R. A. (2007) Tumorinvasion and metastasis initiated by microRNA-10b in breast cancer. Nature 449, 682–688 [PubMed]
6. Selcuklu S. D., Donoghue M. T., Spillane C. (2009) miR-21 as a key regulator of oncogenic processes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 37, 918–925 [PubMed]
7. Jiang S., Zhang H. W., Lu M. H., He X. H., Li Y., Gu H., Liu M. F., Wang E. D. (2010) MicroRNA-155 functions as an OncomiR in breast cancer by targeting the suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 gene. Cancer Res. 70, 3119–3127 [PubMed]
8. Yu Z., Willmarth N. E., Zhou J., Katiyar S., Wang M., Liu Y., McCue P. A., Quong A. A., Lisanti M. P., Pestell R. G. (2010) microRNA 17/20 inhibits cellular invasion and tumor metastasis in breast cancer by heterotypic signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 8231–8236 [PubMed]
9. Welch C., Chen Y., Stallings R. L. (2007) MicroRNA-34a functions as a potential tumor suppressor by inducing apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells. Oncogene 26, 5017–5022 [PubMed]
10. Krichevsky A. M., Sonntag K. C., Isacson O., Kosik K. S. (2006) Specific microRNAs modulate embryonic stem cell-derived neurogenesis. Stem Cells 24, 857–864 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Laios A., O'Toole S., Flavin R., Martin C., Kelly L., Ring M., Finn S. P., Barrett C., Loda M., Gleeson N., D'Arcy T., McGuinness E., Sheils O., Sheppard B., O' Leary J. (2008) Potential role of miR-9 and miR-223 in recurrent ovarian cancer. Mol. Cancer 7, 35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Khew-Goodall Y., Goodall G. J. (2010) Myc-modulated miR-9 makes more metastases. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 209–211 [PubMed]
13. Nass D., Rosenwald S., Meiri E., Gilad S., Tabibian-Keissar H., Schlosberg A., Kuker H., Sion-Vardy N., Tobar A., Kharenko O., Sitbon E., Lithwick Yanai G., Elyakim E., Cholakh H., Gibori H., Spector Y., Bentwich Z., Barshack I., Rosenfeld N. (2009) MiR-92b and miR-9/9* are specifically expressed in brain primary tumors and can be used to differentiate primary from metastatic brain tumors. Brain Pathol. 19, 375–383 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Shah T., Wildes F., Penet M. F., Winnard P. T., Jr., Glunde K., Artemov D., Ackerstaff E., Gimi B., Kakkad S., Raman V., Bhujwalla Z. M. (2010) Choline kinase overexpression increases invasiveness and drug resistance of human breast cancer cells. NMR Biomed. 23, 633–642 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Tan H. X., Wang Q., Chen L. Z., Huang X. H., Chen J. S., Fu X. H., Cao L. Q., Chen X. L., Li W., Zhang L. J. (2010) MicroRNA-9 reduces cell invasion and E-cadherin secretion in SK-Hep-1 cell. Med. Oncol 27, 654–660 [PubMed]
16. Luo H., Zhang H., Zhang Z., Zhang X., Ning B., Guo J., Nie N., Liu B., Wu X. (2009) Down-regulated miR-9 and miR-433 in human gastric carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 28, 82. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Wan H. Y., Guo L. M., Liu T., Liu M., Li X., Tang H. (2010) Regulation of the transcription factor NF-κB1 by microRNA-9 in human gastric adenocarcinoma. Mol. Cancer 9, 16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Guo L. M., Pu Y., Han Z., Liu T., Li Y. X., Liu M., Li X., Tang H. (2009) MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-κB1. FEBS J. 276, 5537–5546 [PubMed]
19. Guled M., Lahti L., Lindholm P. M., Salmenkivi K., Bagwan I., Nicholson A. G., Knuutila S. (2009) CDKN2A, NF2, and JUN are dysregulated among other genes by miRNAs in malignant mesothelioma. A miRNA microarray analysis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 48, 615–623 [PubMed]
20. Lehmann U., Hasemeier B., Christgen M., Müller M., Römermann D., Länger F., Kreipe H. (2008) Epigenetic inactivation of microRNA gene hsa-mir-9–1 in human breast cancer. J. Pathol 214, 17–24 [PubMed]
21. Hsu P. Y., Deatherage D. E., Rodriguez B. A., Liyanarachchi S., Weng Y. I., Zuo T., Liu J., Cheng A. S., Huang T. H. (2009) Xenoestrogen-induced epigenetic repression of microRNA-9-3 in breast epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 69, 5936–5945 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Bandres E., Agirre X., Bitarte N., Ramirez N., Zarate R., Roman-Gomez J., Prosper F., Garcia-Foncillas J. (2009) Epigenetic regulation of microRNA expression in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer 125, 2737–2743 [PubMed]
23. Hildebrandt M. A., Gu J., Lin J., Ye Y., Tan W., Tamboli P., Wood C. G., Wu X. (2010) Hsa-miR-9 methylation status is associated with cancer development and metastatic recurrence in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene 29, 5724–5728 [PubMed]
24. Lujambio A., Calin G. A., Villanueva A., Ropero S., Sánchez-Céspedes M., Blanco D., Montuenga L. M., Rossi S., Nicoloso M. S., Faller W. J., Gallagher W. M., Eccles S. A., Croce C. M., Esteller M. (2008) A microRNA DNA methylation signature for human cancer metastasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 13556–13561 [PubMed]
25. Packer A. N., Xing Y., Harper S. Q., Jones L., Davidson B. L. (2008) The bifunctional microRNA miR-9/miR-9* regulates REST and CoREST and is down-regulated in Huntington disease. J. Neurosci. 28, 14341–14346 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Zhao C., Sun G., Li S., Shi Y. (2009) A feedback regulatory loop involving microRNA-9 and nuclear receptor TLX in neural stem cell fate determination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 365–371 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Chao T. F., Zhang Y., Yan X. Q., Yin B., Gong Y. H., Yuan J. G., Qiang B. Q., Peng X. Z. (2008) MiR-9 regulates the expression of CBX7 in human glioma. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 30, 268–274 [PubMed]
28. Rotkrua P., Akiyama Y., Hashimoto Y., Otsubo T., Yuasa Y. (2011) MiR-9 down-regulates CDX2 expression in gastric cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 129, 2611–2620 [PubMed]
29. Marín-Vidalled M. J., Bolívar A., Zubiaga A., López-Hoyos M. (2010) The combined effect of BCL-2 overexpression and E2F2 deficiency induces an autoimmune syndrome in non-susceptible mouse strain C57BL/6. Autoimmunity 43, 111–120 [PubMed]
30. Godbey W. T., Atala A. (2003) Directed apoptosis in Cox-2-overexpressing cancer cells through expression-targeted gene delivery. Gene therapy 10, 1519–1527 [PubMed]
31. Ngoka L. C. (2008) Sample prep for proteomics of breast cancer. Proteomics and gene ontology reveal dramatic differences in protein solubilization preferences of radioimmunoprecipitation assay and urea lysis buffers. Proteome Sci. 6, 30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Prasannan P., Appling D. R. (2009) Human mitochondrial C1-tetrahydrofolate synthase. Submitochondrial localization of the full-length enzyme and characterization of a short isoform. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 481, 86–93 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Xue L. Y., Chiu S. M., Oleinick N. L. (2003) Staurosporine-induced death of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. A distinction between caspase-3-dependent steps of apoptosis and the critical lethal lesions. Exp. Cell Res. 283, 135–145 [PubMed]
34. Kurokawa H., Nishio K., Fukumoto H., Tomonari A., Suzuki T., Saijo N. (1999) Alteration of caspase-3 (CPP32/Yama/apopain) in wild-type MCF-7, breast cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 6, 33–37 [PubMed]
35. Mc Gee M. M., Hyland E., Campiani G., Ramunno A., Nacci V., Zisterer D. M. (2002) Caspase-3 is not essential for DNA fragmentation in MCF-7 cells during apoptosis induced by the pyrrolo-1,5-benzoxazepine, PBOX-6. FEBS Lett. 515, 66–70 [PubMed]
36. Kottke T. J., Blajeski A. L., Meng X. W., Svingen P. A., Ruchaud S., Mesner P. W., Jr., Boerner S. A., Samejima K., Henriquez N. V., Chilcote T. J., Lord J., Salmon M., Earnshaw W. C., Kaufmann S. H. (2002) Lack of correlation between caspase activation and caspase activity assays in paclitaxel-treated MCF-7 breast cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 804–815 [PubMed]
37. van Dongen S., Abreu-Goodger C., Enright A. J. (2008) Detecting microRNA binding and siRNA off-target effects from expression data. Nat. Methods 5, 1023–1025 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Bartonicek N., Enright A. J. (2010) SylArray. a web server for automated detection of miRNA effects from expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 2900–2901 [PubMed]
39. Sun R., Fu X., Li Y., Xie Y., Mao Y. (2009) Global gene expression analysis reveals reduced abundance of putative microRNA targets in human prostate tumors. BMC Genomics 10, 93. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Lim L. P., Lau N. C., Garrett-Engele P., Grimson A., Schelter J. M., Castle J., Bartel D. P., Linsley P. S., Johnson J. M. (2005) Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs down-regulate large numbers of target mRNAs. Nature 433, 769–773 [PubMed]
41. Gramantieri L., Ferracin M., Fornari F., Veronese A., Sabbioni S., Liu C. G., Calin G. A., Giovannini C., Ferrazzi E., Grazi G. L., Croce C. M., Bolondi L., Negrini M. (2007) Cyclin G1 is a target of miR-122a, a microRNA frequently down-regulated in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 67, 6092–6099 [PubMed]
42. Xu X., Qiao M., Zhang Y., Jiang Y., Wei P., Yao J., Gu B., Wang Y., Lu J., Wang Z., Tang Z., Sun Y., Wu W., Shi Q. (2010) Quantitative proteomics study of breast cancer cell lines isolated from a single patient. Discovery of TIMM17A as a marker for breast cancer. Proteomics 10, 1374–1390 [PubMed]
43. Burrows C., Abd Latip N., Lam S. J., Carpenter L., Sawicka K., Tzolovsky G., Gabra H., Bushell M., Glover D. M., Willis A. E., Blagden S. P. (2010) The RNA binding protein Larp1 regulates cell division, apoptosis, and cell migration. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 5542–5553 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Hayes G. M., Carrigan P. E., Miller L. J. (2007) Serine-arginine protein kinase 1 overexpression is associated with tumorigenic imbalance in mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in breast, colonic, and pancreatic carcinomas. Cancer Res. 67, 2072–2080 [PubMed]
45. Richardson A. L., Wang Z. C., De Nicolo A., Lu X., Brown M., Miron A., Liao X., Iglehart J. D., Livingston D. M., Ganesan S. (2006) X chromosomal abnormalities in basal-like human breast cancer. Cancer Cell 9, 121–132 [PubMed]
46. Zhao H., Langerød A., Ji Y., Nowels K. W., Nesland J. M., Tibshirani R., Bukholm I. K., Kåresen R., Botstein D., Børresen-Dale A. L., Jeffrey S. S. (2004) Different gene expression patterns in invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas of the breast. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 2523–2536 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Rhodes D. R., Yu J., Shanker K., Deshpande N., Varambally R., Ghosh D., Barrette T., Pandey A., Chinnaiyan A. M. (2004) ONCOMINE. a cancer microarray database and integrated data-mining platform. Neoplasia 6, 1–6 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Zhu L., Chen H., Zhou D., Li D., Bai R., Zheng S., Ge W. (2012) MicroRNA-9 up-regulation is involved in colorectal cancer metastasis via promoting cell motility. Med. Oncol. 29, 1037–1043 [PubMed]
49. Tränkenschuh W., Puls F., Christgen M., Albat C., Heim A., Poczkaj J., Fleming P., Kreipe H., Lehmann U. (2010) Frequent and distinct aberrations of DNA methylation patterns in fibrolamellar carcinoma of the liver. PLoS One 5, e13688. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Hanahan D., Weinberg R. A. (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57–70 [PubMed]
51. Jänicke R. U., Ng P., Sprengart M. L., Porter A. G. (1998) Caspase-3 is required for α-fodrin cleavage but dispensable for cleavage of other death substrates in apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15540–15545 [PubMed]
52. Talanian R. V., Quinlan C., Trautz S., Hackett M. C., Mankovich J. A., Banach D., Ghayur T., Brady K. D., Wong W. W. (1997) Substrate specificities of caspase family proteases. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9677–9682 [PubMed]
53. Spruce B. A., Campbell L. A., McTavish N., Cooper M. A., Appleyard M. V., O'Neill M., Howie J., Samson J., Watt S., Murray K., McLean D., Leslie N. R., Safrany S. T., Ferguson M. J., Peters J. A., Prescott A. R., Box G., Hayes A., Nutley B., Raynaud F., Downes C. P., Lambert J. J., Thompson A. M., Eccles S. (2004) Small molecule antagonists of the δ1 receptor cause selective release of the death program in tumor and self-reliant cells and inhibit tumor growth in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 64, 4875–4886 [PubMed]
54. Twiddy D., Cohen G. M., Macfarlane M., Cain K. (2006) Caspase-7 is directly activated by the approximately 700-kDa apoptosome complex and is released as a stable XIAP-caspase-7 approximately 200-kDa complex. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 3876–3888 [PubMed]
55. Dalmay T., Edwards D. R. (2006) MicroRNAs and the hallmarks of cancer. Oncogene 25, 6170–6175 [PubMed]
56. Zhu S., Wu H., Wu F., Nie D., Sheng S., Mo Y. Y. (2008) MicroRNA-21 targets tumor suppressor genes in invasion and metastasis. Cell Res. 18, 350–359 [PubMed]
57. Asangani I. A., Rasheed S. A., Nikolova D. A., Leupold J. H., Colburn N. H., Post S., Allgayer H. (2008) MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) post-transcriptionally down-regulates tumor suppressor Pdcd4 and stimulates invasion, intravasation, and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene 27, 2128–2136 [PubMed]
58. Kumar M. S., Lu J., Mercer K. L., Golub T. R., Jacks T. (2007) Impaired microRNA processing enhances cellular transformation and tumorigenesis. Nat. Genet. 39, 673–677 [PubMed]
59. Fang X. J., Jiang H., Zhao X. P., Jiang W. M. (2011) The role of a new CD44st in increasing the invasion capability of the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. BMC Cancer 11, 290. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Fox B. P., Kandpal R. P. (2004) Invasiveness of breast carcinoma cells and transcript profile. Eph receptors and ephrin ligands as molecular markers of potential diagnostic and prognostic application. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 318, 882–892 [PubMed]
61. Fornari F., Gramantieri L., Giovannini C., Veronese A., Ferracin M., Sabbioni S., Calin G. A., Grazi G. L., Croce C. M., Tavolari S., Chieco P., Negrini M., Bolondi L. (2009) MiR-122/cyclin G1 interaction modulates p53 activity and affects doxorubicin sensitivity of human hepatocarcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 69, 5761–5767 [PubMed]
62. Perez R., Wu N., Klipfel A. A., Beart R. W., Jr. (2003) A better cell cycle target for gene therapy of colorectal cancer. cyclin G. J. Gastrointest Surg. 7, 884–889 [PubMed]
63. Gordon E. M., Liu P. X., Chen Z. H., Liu L., Whitley M. D., Gee C., Groshen S., Hinton D. R., Beart R. W., Hall F. L. (2000) Inhibition of metastatic tumor growth in nude mice by portal vein infusions of matrix-targeted retroviral vectors bearing a cytocidal cyclin G1 construct. Cancer Res. 60, 3343–3347 [PubMed]
64. Liang J., Bian M. L., Chen Q. Y., Liu X., Ou H., Li M., Liu J. (2006) Relationship between cyclin G1 and human papilloma virus infection in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinoma. Chin. Med. Sci. J. 21, 81–85 [PubMed]
65. Krishnakumar S., Mohan A., Kandalam M., Ramkumar H. L., Venkatesan N., Das R. R. (2008) SRPK1. a cisplatin sensitive protein expressed in retinoblastoma. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 50, 402–406 [PubMed]
66. Schenk P. W., Boersma A. W., Brandsma J. A., den Dulk H., Burger H., Stoter G., Brouwer J., Nooter K. (2001) SKY1 is involved in cisplatin-induced cell kill in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and inactivation of its human homologue, SRPK1, induces cisplatin resistance in a human ovarian carcinoma cell line. Cancer Res. 61, 6982–6986 [PubMed]
67. Plasencia C., Martínez-Balibrea E., Martinez-Cardús A., Quinn D. I., Abad A., Neamati N. (2006) Expression analysis of genes involved in oxaliplatin response and development of oxaliplatin-resistant HT29 colon cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol 29, 225–235 [PubMed]
68. Thorsen K., Mansilla F., Schepeler T., Oster B., Rasmussen M. H., Dyrskjot L., Karni R., Akerman M., Krainer A. R., Laurberg S., Andersen C. L., Orntoft T. F. (2011) Alternative splicing of SLC39A14 in colorectal cancer is regulated by the Wnt pathway. Mol. Cell Proteomics 10, M110.002998 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Sanidas I., Kotoula V., Ritou E., Daans J., Lenz C., Mairhofer M., Daniilidou M., Kolbus A., Kruft V., Ponsaerts P., Nikolakaki E. (2010) The ratio of SRPK1/SRPK1a regulates erythroid differentiation in K562 leukaemic cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1803, 1319–1331 [PubMed]
70. Petrenko A. A., Pavlova L. S., Karseladze A. I., Kisseljov F. L., Kisseljova N. P. (2006) Down-regulation of genes encoding for subunits of adaptor complex-3 in cervical carcinomas. Biochemistry 71, 1153–1160 [PubMed]
71. Mantripragada K. K., Díaz de Ståhl T., Patridge C., Menzel U., Andersson R., Chuzhanova N., Kluwe L., Guha A., Mautner V., Dumanski J. P., Upadhyaya M. (2009) Genome-wide high resolution analysis of DNA copy number alterations in NF1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors using 32K BAC array. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 48, 897–907 [PubMed]
72. Parle-McDermott A., Pangilinan F., O'Brien K. K., Mills J. L., Magee A. M., Troendle J., Sutton M., Scott J. M., Kirke P. N., Molloy A. M., Brody L. C. (2009) A common variant in MTHFD1L is associated with neural tube defects and mRNA splicing efficiency. Hum. Mutat 30, 1650–1656 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Christensen K. E., Mackenzie R. E. (2008) Mitochondrial methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase, methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase, and formyltetrahydrofolate synthetases. Vitam. Horm. 79, 393–410 [PubMed]
74. Andrew A. S., Gui J., Sanderson A. C., Mason R. A., Morlock E. V., Schned A. R., Kelsey K. T., Marsit C. J., Moore J. H., Karagas M. R. (2009) Bladder cancer SNP panel predicts susceptibility and survival. Hum. Genet. 125, 527–539 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Sertel S., Eichhorn T., Sieber S., Sauer A., Weiss J., Plinkert P. K., Efferth T. (2010) Factors determining sensitivity or resistance of tumor cell lines toward artesunate. Chem. Biol. Interact 185, 42–52 [PubMed]
76. Bigelow R. L., Williams B. J., Carroll J. L., Daves L. K., Cardelli J. A. (2009) TIMP-1 overexpression promotes tumorigenesis of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and alters expression of a subset of cancer promoting genes in vivo distinct from those observed in vitro. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 117, 31–44 [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology