We have documented the extraordinary efficacy of PPARγ activation in ameliorating the pathologic and behavioral deficits in an AD mouse model. Importantly, these dramatic changes were elicited after a short 9 d period of drug treatment. A primary finding of this study is the demonstration that PPARγ may act through distinct mechanisms to clear soluble and deposited, fibrillar forms of Aβ. Moreover, we have identified a previously unappreciated role of astrocytes in the removal of amyloid from the brain.
We report that the clearance of soluble forms of Aβ occurs through the ability of PPARγ to induce the expression of
apoe through which it promotes sAβ degradation. We have previously documented that apoE acts to facilitate the proteolysis of soluble Aβ peptides both in the interstitial fluid and intracellularly by microglia through the actions of IDE and neprilysin, respectively (
Jiang et al., 2008). In microglia, apoE facilitates soluble Aβ degradation through reduction of intracellular cholesterol levels and not through direct contact with the Aβ peptide (
Lee et al., 2012). Recently, we have shown that activation of the Retinoid X Receptor, the obligate heterodimeric partner of PPARγ and LXRs, rapidly reverses AD pathology in mouse models of AD, and many of the beneficial effects seen in that study may occur through activation of PPAR signaling pathways (
Cramer et al., 2012). The principal conceptual advance in this study was the recognition that in astrocytes and microglia the expression of
apoe is robustly regulated through a coupled metabolic pathway regulated by PPARγ and LXRα, and genetic inactivation of PPARγ in astrocytes results in a dramatic reduction in the expression of these LXR target genes (). While this pathway has been well documented in the periphery, it was not recognized to be operative in the brain until now (
Chawla et al., 2001).
A significant outcome of this study is a new appreciation for the roles of astrocytes in amyloid clearance. We report that astrocytes have the capacity to take up sAβ and degrade it in an apoE-dependent manner, similar to microglia (, ;
Jiang et al., 2008). Moreover, pioglitazone treatment resulted in intracellular Aβ accumulation in astrocytes, coincident with the reduction in plaque burden (). Astrocytes greatly outnumber microglia in the CNS, and their ability to remove even modest amounts of Aβ in the brain may have a significant impact on amyloid clearance in the brain. Amyloid-laden astrocytes were only found in the cortex of pioglitazone-treated animals and not in vehicle-treated
APP/PS1 mice (). Several studies have shown that astrocytes are capable of taking up amyloid peptides (
Funato et al., 1998;
Matsunaga et al., 2003;
Nagele et al., 2003;
Lasagna-Reeves and Kayed, 2011), and
in vitro this ability was restricted to adult astrocytes (
al-Ali and al-Hussain, 1996;
Wyss-Coray et al., 2003;
Koistinaho et al., 2004;
Pihlaja et al., 2008). This study strongly supports the view that PPARγ activation initiates amyloid clearance pathways in astrocytes and suggests a reevaluation for the role of astrocytes in amyloid clearance in AD.
Microglia are the principal immune effector cells in the CNS and are the only professional phagocyte in the CNS. These cells undergo a classical M1 inflammatory activation in response of amyloid deposition, leading to a proinflammatory milieu in the brain (
Wyss-Coray, 2006;
Heneka et al., 2010). An enigmatic feature of AD is that although microglia are competent phagocytes, they fail to effectively clear deposited Aβ from the brain. The basis of the inactivation of phagocytic function is unknown but is postulated to be the result of autocrine actions of cytokines (
Koenigsknecht-Talboo and Landreth, 2005). PPARγ activation has been shown to enhance the phagocytic capabilities of peripheral M2 polarized macrophages (
Chinetti-Gbaguidi et al., 2011). One striking finding in this study was the extraordinary ability of pioglitazone to stimulate microglia to phagocytose amyloid deposits from the transgenic mice (). Macrophages/microglia are capable of exhibiting a spectrum of phenotypic activation states which dictate their activities (
Gordon, 2003;
Mosser and Edwards, 2008;
Mandrekar-Colucci and Landreth, 2010). Nuclear receptors have only recently been appreciated to play an crucial role in promoting the phenotypic change of macrophages from a “classically” M1 activated to alternatively activated M2 states (
Odegaard et al., 2007,
2008;
Zelcer et al., 2007;
Bouhlel et al., 2008;
Kalinin et al., 2009;
Chawla, 2010). Activation of these nuclear receptors suppresses NFκB-mediated inflammatory responses and activates their phagocytic machinery (
Zelcer et al., 2007;
Mukundan et al., 2009;
Glass and Saijo, 2010). In the AD brain, microglia fail to effectively phagocytose Aβ and are also impaired in their ability to degrade Aβ fibrils (
Chung et al., 1999;
Cameron and Landreth, 2010). Thus, modulating microglial activation status by targeting nuclear receptors appears to restore the competence of these cells to phagocytose and clear amyloid in the AD brain (
Mukundan et al., 2009;
Chinetti-Gbaguidi et al., 2011). We demonstrate that PPARγ activation in the
APP/PS1 animals provoked the conversion of at least a subset of microglia from a classical to alternative activation states, suppressing proinflammatory gene expression (
IL-1β,
TNFα) and inducing the expression of anti-inflammatory genes (
YM1, Fizz1, Arg1, TGF-β) associated with tissue repair (). This latter function is accompanied by expression of genes necessary for phagocytosis and induction of phagocytic activity and this is consistent with our observation of enhanced phagocytosis of fAβ by microglia.
Terwel et al. (2011) have recently reported similar findings upon activation of LXRs in a mouse model of AD.
The actions of PPARγ in the brain of murine models of AD have been controversial, largely due to the poor penetrance of its agonists into the brain and active P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux mechanisms (
Maeshiba et al., 1997;
Hemauer et al., 2010). In the present study we have used a high dose of pioglitazone (80 mg · kg
−1 · d
−1) that is ~8 times the clinically approved dose, to obviate this problem. Significantly, we have used a very short treatment interval (9 d), because of the expeditious induction of receptor-mediated gene expression. A number of studies of the thiazolidinedione agonists of PPARγ, pioglitazone (Actos) and rosiglitazone (Avandia), reported salutary effects of these drugs in murine models of AD (
Mandrekar-Colucci and Landreth, 2011). Indeed, PPARγ agonists have been shown to effectively lower both soluble levels of Aβ, reduce plaque burden, and improve behavior in some AD mouse models (
Yan et al., 2003;
Camacho et al., 2004;
Heneka et al., 2005;
Nicolakakis et al., 2008;
Escribano et al., 2010;
Toledo and Inestrosa, 2010;
Rodriguez-Rivera et al., 2011); however, there has been no consensus on the mechanisms of action (
Pedersen and Flynn, 2004;
Escribano et al., 2010;
Toledo and Inestrosa, 2010). The anti-inflammatory actions of these drugs have been postulated to underlie their beneficial effects. However, other laboratories have explored additional mechanisms through which PPARγ may exert beneficial effects.
Pederson and Flynn (2004) have suggested that PPARγ elicits behavioral improvements through its ability reduce peripheral corticosterone levels.
Toledo and Inestrosa (2010) suggested that PPARγ activation could promote neuro-protection by activating the wnt signaling pathway. In this paper we have demonstrated yet another mechanism through which PPARγ activation may ameliorate AD pathophysiology.
Because of the efficacy of PPARγ agonist action in mouse models of AD, small clinical trials evaluated the effects of receptor activation and found that pioglitazone treatment improved memory and cognition in patients with mild to moderate AD (
Hanyu et al., 2009;
Sato et al., 2011). A larger phase II clinical trial showed improvements in memory retention and attention with the treatment of rosiglitazone (6 months) in patients who did not possess an ApoE4 allele (
Risner et al., 2006). However, phase III clinical trials, using rosiglitazone, failed to show efficacy for the treatment of AD (
Gold et al., 2010). It is important to note that in these trials rosiglitazone was administered at dosages that were much lower than those needed to see beneficial effects on AD pathophysiology in rodent models of the disease.
In this study we have demonstrated the rapid effects of PPARγ activation on amyloid clearance, microglial polarization, and the reversal of cognitive deficits associated with AD. Additionally, we have provided an explanation for how PPARγ modulates AD-related pathology in a mouse model. We have shown a mechanistic linkage between the PPARγ and LXR pathways, which had not previously been documented in the brain, and results in the production of lipidated ApoE particles, facilitating the degradation of soluble Aβ species (). PPARγ activation changes the inflammatory milieu of the brain by phenotypically polarizing microglia to an alternative, M2 phenotype, allowing them to phagocytically remove amyloid deposits (). These data suggest that brain-penetrant PPARγ agonists represent a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of AD.