PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Hum Genet. Author manuscript; available in PMC Aug 27, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3428017
NIHMSID: NIHMS317006
Substance Dependence Low Density Whole Genome Association Study In Two Distinct American Populations
Yi Yu,1 Henry R. Kranzler,4 Carolien Panhuysen,1,2 Roger D. Weiss,5 James Poling,6 Lindsay A. Farrer,1,2,3 and Joel Gelernter6,7
1Department of Medicine (Genetics Program), Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Boston, MA
2Department of Biostatistics, Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Boston, MA
3Department of Neurology, 3Genetics & Genomics and 3Epidemiology, Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Boston, MA
4Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT
5Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Program, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA and the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
6Department of Psychiatry, Division of Human Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine; and VA CT Healthcare Center
7Departments of Neurobiology and Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
Cocaine and opioid dependence are common, complex disorders with high heritability that commonly co-occur with other substance dependence disorders. Improved insight into the genetic basis of substance dependence would help elucidate its etiology and could inform its prevention and treatment. To generate new hypotheses about the genetics of substance dependence, we genotyped 5633 tagging single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers in 1699 subjects from 339 African American (AA) families and 334 European American (EA) families ascertained through a sib pair meeting DSM-IV criteria for either cocaine or opioid dependence. The associations between genetic markers and five substance dependence traits (cocaine dependence, opioid dependence, cocaine-induced paranoia, alcohol dependence, and nicotine dependence) were assessed by family based association tests (FBAT). Results were ranked according to several criteria including statistical significance, concordance of results across population samples, and potential biological relevance of the implicated gene. The top-ranked result was an association of SNP rs1133503 in the MANEA gene with cocaine-induced paranoia (CIP). Our study provides an initial substance dependence trait-specific blue-print of associated regions for future candidate gene studies.
Keywords: family-based association tests, genomewide association, cocaine dependence, alcohol dependence, nicotine dependence, cocaine-induced paranoia
Chronic use of psychoactive drugs can result in a dependence syndrome, the central element of which is impaired control over substance use, but which may also include tolerance and physical dependence symptoms (APA 1994). Substance dependence poses serious medical, legal, and social risks to those affected (and sometimes to others), and is thus an important public health issue. In one study, the overall global burden of disease (GBD) due to the use of all psychoactive substances was estimated to be 8.9% of disability adjusted life years (DALYs), to which tobacco and alcohol contributed 4.1% and 4.0%, respectively, while illicit substances including cocaine and opioid were responsible for 0.8% (WHO 2004).
Although the etiology of substance dependence is poorly understood, evidence from adoption and twin studies implicates a moderate-to-strong role for genetic factors (Tsuang et al. 1996; Kendler and Prescott 1998; True et al. 1999; Karkowski et al. 2000; Kendler et al. 2000; Kendler et al. 2003). A genome-wide linkage scan detected regions harboring genes for cocaine dependence (CD) on chromosomes 3 and 10, and for cocaine-induced paranoia (CIP) on chromosome 9 (Gelernter et al. 2005). Regions on chromosome 17 showed significant evidence of linkage to opioid dependence (OD) in a recent study (Gelernter et al. 2006a), and chromosome 14q showed suggestive linkage for OD in an ethnically mixed population (Lachman et al. 2007). By comparison, a larger number of studies focused on alcohol dependence (AD) have identified linkage to several regions on chromosomes 1, 2, 4, 7, and 11 (reviewed by Dick and Beirut, 2006). Recent linkage studies showed several chromosomal regions to be potentially linked to nicotine dependence (ND) or smoking behavior traits, including 10q, 7q and 11p in the Finland twins cohort (Loukola et al. 2007) and locations on chromosomes 1–14 and 16–21 in European and African American samples (Li. 2008; Li et al. 2007; Li et al. 2006; Gelernter et al. 2004; Gelernter et al. 2007). A recent genome wide linkage scan of quantitative traits (QT) for AD and illicit drug (including cannabis) dependence conducted in informative pedigrees from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) identified several novel linkages, the most significant of which (multipoint LOD score of 3.7 for an AD QT) did not exceed the threshold for genome wide significance (empirical p-value = 0.06) (Agrawal et al. 2007). Case-control and family-based studies targeting candidate genes selected because of known or hypothesized biological roles have reported and confirmed associations with GABRA2 (Covault et al. 2004; Lappalainen et al. 2005; Agrawal et al. 2006; Fehr et al. 2006; Soyka et al. 2008), ADH4 (Edenberg et al. 2006; Guindalini et al. 2005; Luo et al. 2006; Luo et al. 2005a) and CHRM2 (Luo et al. 2005b; Wang et al. 2004) for AD, with DDC (Ma et al. 2005; Yu et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2006a), the TTC12-ANKK1-DRD2 gene cluster (Gelernter et al. 2006b; Yang et al. 2007), and several cholinergic nicotinic receptor genes (most notably CHRNB3 and CHRNA5) (Saccone et al. 2007; Berrettini et al. 2008) for ND and related traits, and with OPRM1 (Kranzler et al. 1998; Bart et al. 2004; Luo et al. 2003; Zhang et al. 2006b) for dependence on various substances.
Undoubtedly, the few robust associations identified thus far represent only a small portion of the genes involved in the etiology of substance dependence. With the completion of the human genome sequence, SNP consortium and HapMap projects, and advances in genotyping arrays, genome wide association (GWA) studies have the potential to pinpoint many more genes for substance dependence traits. Recently a GWA study using sample pooling and 2.4 million SNPs in a population-based sample suggested several novel genes possibly associated with ND, including NRNX1 and VPS13A (Bierut et al. 2007). However, high density scans are still expensive, and the results from a single moderately-powered sample are not routinely confirmed, especially in samples from other populations. In this study, we carried out GWA scans using a low-density SNP chip array for four major substance dependence disorders (CD, OD, ND and AD) in a family-based cohort comprised of two distinct population samples with the goal of generating a trait-specific blue-print of associated regions for future candidate gene studies.
Subject recruitment and assessment
A total of 673 families were recruited at four clinical sites in the United States: Yale University School of Medicine (APT Foundation; New Haven, CT), the University of Connecticut Health Center (Farmington, CT), McLean Hospital (Harvard Medical School; Belmont, MA), and the Medical University of South Carolina (Charleston, SC). Subjects gave informed consent as approved by the institutional review board at each clinical site, and a certificate of confidentiality for the work was obtained from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Families were ascertained through affected sibling pairs (ASPs) that met DSM-IV criteria for cocaine or opioid dependence (APA 1994), as previously described (Gelernter et al. 2005; 2006a). Probands were excluded from further study if diagnosed with a major psychotic illness (e.g., schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder). Other family members of the ASPs were recruited if available, regardless of affection status. Subjects were classified as African American (AA) or European American (EA) based on a Bayesian model-based clustering method using genetic marker information as previously described (Gelernter et al. 2007). For all primary analyses, the population groups were treated as independent samples. Characteristics of the sample are described in Table 1.
Table 1
Table 1
Sample characteristics.
Diagnosis
Subjects were interviewed using a computerized version of the Semi-Structured Assessment for Drug Dependence and Alcoholism (SSADDA), an instrument eliciting detailed clinical and behavioral information to which scoring algorithms can be applied to derive DSM-IV diagnoses for substance dependence and other psychiatric traits (Gelernter et al. 2005; Pierucci-Lagha et al. 2005; Pierucci-Lagha et al. 2007). Accordingly, diagnoses of CD, OD, ND and AD were established based on the subject meeting three or more of the following seven criteria during a 12-month period: tolerance; withdrawal; taking the substance in larger amounts or over a longer period than was intended; persistent desire, or unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control substance use; a great deal of time spent in activities necessary to obtain, use, or recover from substance use; giving up or reducing important social, occupational, or recreational activities; continuing substance use despite persistent, or recurrent physical or psychological problems. Subjects who met criteria for substance abuse were considered as unknown and hence excluded from analysis of that trait. Subjects who reported symptoms of paranoia during cocaine intoxication were diagnosed as affected with CIP. An ordinal score between 0–10 for the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) (Heatherton et al. 1991; Fagerstrom 1978) was calculated based on the subject’s responses to 6 questions about smoking behavior. Although the majority of subjects in this study were dependent on two or more substances, the correlations for comorbidity for all pairs of traits are modest (see Table 2). Clinical information was unavailable for 137 subjects (108 parents and 29 sibs, 71 EAs and 66 AAs) who provided a blood specimen. Although these individuals were classified as missing for all phenotypic traits, they were included in the analyses because they provide information about transmission of marker alleles.
Table 2
Table 2
Spearman correlation coefficient between the four major substance dependence traits.
SNP selection and genotyping
A total of 6,008 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped at the Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR) using the Illumina Linkage IVb Marker Panel (http://www.cidr.jhmi.edu). Data for 36 markers (0.6% of the total) were not provided by CIDR because they displayed excessive replicate or Mendelian errors, had more than 50% missing data, or were monomorphic (i.e., all individuals homozygous for the same allele). The average rate of missing data among the remaining markers was 0.10%. We limited our analysis to 5,633 autosomal markers because the power for detecting association with X-linked markers in a family-based design without parental genotype information is comparatively low (Ding et al. 2006; Chung et al. 2007). On average, these markers were spaced 518 kb apart and had a heterozygosity of 0.405.
Statistical analysis
Mendelian inconsistencies were detected by the PedCheck program (O’Connell and Weeks 1998). A total of 248 genotyping inconsistencies were identified out of 9,570,467 assays for all DNA samples from 1699 subjects (i.e., <0.003% of all assays) and these results were excluded from all subsequent analyses. Three hundred forty-seven SNPs were excluded from further analysis because they were not informative in either population sample (i.e., minor allele frequency [MAF] less than 0.1). Consistency with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) expectations for each SNP was tested using a χ2 test in each ethnic group using a set of 673 unrelated subjects (one random subject from each family). Another 46 SNPs with significant evidence of deviation from HWE (p value < 0.001) were then excluded from further analysis. Association of the remaining 5,240 SNPs with each trait was evaluated using the Family Based Association Test (FBAT) program (Horvath et al. 2001) assuming an additive model under the null hypothesis of no linkage and no association. FTND score was adjusted for potential confounding factors (i.e., age and sex) in each population sample by computing standardized residuals using SAS (version 9.0).
Two criteria were applied to the test results to screen for potential candidate genomic regions associated with each trait. First, the SNP had to show significant evidence of association with the same trait (marginal p-value <0.05) in both the AA and EA samples. Second, the pattern of association of the SNP with the trait had to be the same in both samples. FBAT was performed on the combined group of AA and EA families only for those findings that were corroborated in the two independent samples.
Figure 1 shows the distribution of the MAF to be nearly uniform between 0.1 and 0.5 in the AA sample, whereas more than two-thirds of the SNPs had a MAF of at least 0.4 in the EA sample, an observation consistent with the fact that the SNP array was designed primarily based on information content in EAs. Each SNP was assessed for association with each of the six substance dependence traits. Complete results (i.e., each SNP and each trait in each ethnic group) are available at http://genetics.bumc.bu.edu/study_results.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of SNP minor allele frequencies (MAF) in African American (AA) and European American (EA) samples.
A total of 13 SNPs (0.25% of the total) showed significant evidence for and similar patterns of association with CD in both AA (0.0009 < p < 0.05) and EA (0.007 < p < 0.05) families (Table 3). In the pooled sample of families, the strength of association for each of these SNPs achieved a level of significance of 0.005 or lower. Six of these 13 SNPs are located within known gene sequences or 5’promoter regions, and the most significant of these was rs1381355, which is located in the MGC48628 gene on chromosome 4 (p = 0.0002 in the combined sample).
Table 3
Table 3
Top associations for cocaine dependence.
Eight SNPs were significant in both groups for OD (Table 4). Three of these SNPs on chromosome 2 and one SNP on chromosome 20 are far from any known gene sequences. The most significant result among the gene-based SNPs was rs770124 in NAV3 on chromosome 12 (p = 0.0003 in the combined sample).
Table 4
Table 4
Top associations for opioid dependence.
A slightly larger number of families were informative for ND than for CD or OD (Table 5). Six SNPs met our two selection criteria but only two (rs1886040 and rs1062935) are located within genes. A completely separate set of six SNPs met significance criteria for the smoking-related quantitative trait FTND (Table 6). Three of these SNPs are located in gene sequences on chromosome 5, 6 and 18. Of note, the genes tagged by the SNPs on chromosomes 6 (PLEKHG1) and 18 (PLEKHE1) encode pleckstrin homology domain proteins.
Table 5
Table 5
Top associations for nicotine dependence.
Table 6
Table 6
Top associations for Fagerstrom score.
Only three SNPs were significantly associated with AD in both groups, and all of them are located in genes either on chromosome 1 (PDE4B and TBX19) or chromosome 9 (CCRK) (Table 7).
Table 7
Table 7
Top associations for alcohol dependence.
The most significant result in the entire study (p=0.00005 in the combined sample) was the association of CIP with rs1133503 which is located in MANEA (Table 8). Three of the other eight SNPs significantly associated with CIP are also located in genes (DNAH8, NARG2, TYK2).
Table 8
Table 8
Top associations for cocaine induced paranoia.
To our knowledge, this is the first GWA study for multiple substance dependence traits performed simultaneously in two cohorts from distinct populations. Recognizing the limited power of our sample ascertained through and comprised primarily of sib pairs affected with CD or OD, our goal was to take advantage of the combined sample to generate new hypotheses about the genetic basis of substance dependence by identifying and prioritizing candidate genes or chromosome regions implicated in both samples as targets for further investigation.
The most significant finding in this study was the association of CIP with rs1133503 (p = 0.00005 in the combined sample), which is located in the 3′UTR of the α-endomannosidase (MANEA) gene. Absence or defective function of lysosomal α-endomannosidase could result in accumulation of undegraded mannose-rich oligosaccharides that can induce progressive neurologic deterioration and premature death (Crawley and Walkley 2007). From a biological perspective, the most noteworthy finding among the significant results for CD was with rs8929 (p=0.003 in the combined sample). This SNP is located in the 3′UTR of the gene encoding synaptotagmin XIII (SYT13), which belongs to a family of proteins serving as calcium sensors in facilitation and asynchronous neurotransmitter release (Saraswati et al. 2007). These calcium sensors regulate baseline synaptic transmission and short-term synaptic plasticity, and may play a key role in the etiology of substance dependence. We also detected significant association (p=0.0003 in the combined sample) of OD with a SNP (rs770124) in the neuron navigator 3 (NAV3) gene; neuron navigators are expressed predominantly in the nervous system and involved in axon guidance (Maes et al. 2002). A SNP (rs8688) in the TTC9 gene on chromosome 14 was significantly associated with OD in our study (p=0.003 in the combined sample) and is located approximately 5 cM from a linkage peak for OD in an ethnically mixed sample from New York City (Lachman et al. 2007). TTC9 encodes tetratricopeptide repeat domain 9, a hormonally regulated protein whose function is not yet clear. We have shown previously that another TTC gene, TTC12, is associated to nicotine (Gelernter et al, 2006b) and alcohol (Yang et al, 2007) dependence.
Our GWA study identified association of FTND with two SNPs from unlinked genes, PLEKHG1 on chromosome 6 and PHLPP (a.k.a. PLEKHE1) on chromosome 18, which encode homologous proteins involved in cell signaling. Each of these genes contains a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, which plays a key role in cell signaling and cytoskeletal regulation by binding to phosphoinositides (Harlan et al. 1994). PHLPP is involved in the selective termination of PI3K/Akt signaling pathways (Brognard et al. 2007), which could be activated by nicotine via the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (Carlisle et al. 2007). PHLPP is located under a broad linkage peak for a smoking-related quantitative trait in an independent sample of EA and AA families (Li et al, 2008). A recent study showed that a mutation in the PH domain of PLEKHG5, another member of the PLEKHG family, causes lower motor neuron disease (Maystadt et al. 2007). According to the UniGene expression profile database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=unigene), PLEKHG1 and PHLPP are both expressed in the brain and peripheral nervous system. It is possible that variants or isoforms of these PH–domain-containing proteins have an impact on the cell signaling pathway that regulates neuronal plasticity, and thus could influence predisposition to ND.
The use of GWA is increasingly recognized as a promising approach to identify common genetic variants that contribute substantially to the risk of human disease (Risch and Merikangas 1996; Kruglyak 1999; Hirschhorn and Daly 2005; Christensen and Murray 2007), and there is an impressive list of robust associations for several complex disorders (The Welcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2007). As discussed above, the results from our study that were strongest statistically also make sense biologically, which is encouraging. Nonetheless, highly significant genetic association findings for complex traits are not often replicated, and thus must be interpreted cautiously (Colhoun et al. 2003; Tabor et al. 2002). In response to this problem, an expert panel (Chanock et al. 2007) suggested several criteria for establishing replication of genetic associations including: (1) replication studies should be conducted in independent data sets of sufficient sample size to distinguish convincingly the proposed effect from no effect; (2) the same or a very similar phenotype should be analyzed; (3) similar magnitude of effect and significance should be demonstrated with the same SNP or SNP in high linkage disequilibrium with the prior SNP; and (4) a joint or combined analysis should lead to a smaller p-value than that seen in the original report. Two aspects of our study address these guidelines. First, because our results were obtained from family-based samples and by comparing allele transmission rates, they are unlikely to be caused by stratification within a population group. Second, our criteria for selecting SNPs or genes for further consideration included significant results in both population samples with the same pattern of association. Consistent results from independent samples of distinctive genetic background not only lessen the concern that the results are due to chance, but also increase the likelihood that the association is generalizable. In addition, we took advantage of a rich dataset containing detailed information on dependence on several psychoactive drugs (for which diagnosis has been shown to be reliable), conducting a simultaneous search for potential candidate genes influencing several substance dependence traits. The benefit of a single large and well-characterized population was recently demonstrated in a GWA study of seven common diseases in a British population (The Welcome Trust Case Control Consortium). Similarly, our findings offer a set of candidates for future genetic studies of substance dependence traits.
To avoid high genotyping cost and multiple testing problems, GWA studies often follow a staged design, in which a large number of markers are genotyped in a portion of the sample in the first stage, and a relatively small number of markers showing association in the discovery dataset are genotyped in the remainder of the sample in the second stage. Association test findings in the second stage are usually considered to be a replication. However, in spite of the recommendations for stringent significance levels in the discovery sample, Skol et al. 2006) demonstrated that analysis of a single undivided dataset often has greater power to detect association than the two-stage design. Although our GWA study included two datasets derived from a single study population and thus appears to conform to the staged design, we treated the datasets as independent discovery samples since they are genetically distinct and thus may have some unique genetic associations with substance dependence (which we had to forgo identifying owing to our requirement for significance in each dataset individually). We capitalized instead on the opportunity to replicate findings within the discovery sample.
Our results should be interpreted cautiously in light of several limitations of our study design. First, we analyzed 5,240 SNPs, a number that is much smaller than contemporary high density GWA studies and insufficient to cover most gene regions. Many genes influencing risk to substance dependence traits were probably not detected because the SNP array panel in our study included SNPs from fewer than 10 percent of all known genes. Second, the FBAT approach is one of the most conservative methods for genetic association analysis and is less powerful than methods used in population-based designs due in part to families that are uninformative for the transmission component of the association test (Van Steen et al, 2005). Third, none of the results in our study would be considered significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons using a Bonferroni correction (threshold p = 0.05/5240 = 0.00001). However, since all of the results proposed for follow-up required evidence for association in each data set, this correction is probably overly conservative. Moreover, given our requirement that a result attain a p-value of 0.05 in both population samples to be considered significant, the expected number of findings for a trait surpassing this threshold would be six (i.e., (0.05)2 * 5240 * 0.5) assuming a one-tailed test. Seven or more significant results were obtained with CD, OD and CIP. Finally, our selection criteria ignored potential true associations that are evident in only one population. Population-specific associations may account for lack of correspondence in the same dataset of the association signals reported here with linkage peaks for these traits, each of which was found in only one population (Gelernter et al. 2005; Gelernter et al. 2006a; Gelernter et al. 2007). Given that the purpose of this study was hypothesis generation rather than hypothesis testing, the latter two concerns would be lessened by follow-up studies involving more detailed analysis of candidate genes and testing in additional populations.
In summary, our GWA study identified several novel candidate genes for six substance dependence traits in sets of families from two distinct populations. This illustrates the merits of a GWA approach using distinct population samples in the discovery (i.e., hypothesis generating) stage. The results of this approach will encourage future investigations of the identified associations using this and other datasets.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH (NIDA) grants R01 DA12690, R01 DA12849, K24 DA15105, K24 DA022288, and K24AA013736. Dr. Kathleen Brady (Medical University of South Carolina) provided valuable patient recruitment and supervision at the MUSC site. We thank John Farrell for database management assistance. Genotyping services were provided by the Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR). CIDR is fully funded through a federal contract from the National Institutes of Health to The Johns Hopkins University contract number N01-HG-65403.
  • Agrawal A, Edenberg HJ, Foroud T, Bierut LJ, Dunne G, Hinrichs AL, Nurnberger JI, Crowe R, Kuperman S, Schuckit MA, et al. Association of GABRA2 with drug dependence in the collaborative study of the genetics of alcoholism sample. Behav Genet. 2006;36:640–50. [PubMed]
  • Agrawal A, Hinrichs AL, Dunn G, Bertelsen S, Dick DM, Saccone SF, Saccone NL, Grucza RA, Wang JC, Cloninger CR, et al. Linkage scan for quantitative traits identifies new regions of interest for substance dependence in the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) sample. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4. American Psychiatric Press; Washington, D.C.: 1994.
  • Bart G, Heilig M, LaForge KS, Pollak L, Leal SM, Ott J, Kreek MJ. Substantial attributable risk related to a functional mu-opioid receptor gene polymorphism in association with heroin addiction in central Sweden. Mol Psychiatry. 2004;9:547–9. [PubMed]
  • Berrettini W, Yuan X, Tozzi F, Song K, Francks C, Chilcoat H, Waterworth D, Muglia P, Mooser V. Alpha-5/alpha-3 nicotinic receptor subunit alleles increase risk for heavy smoking. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13:368–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bierut LJ, Madden PA, Breslau N, Johnson EO, Hatsukami D, Pomerleau OF, Swan GE, Rutter J, Bertelsen S, Fox L, et al. Novel genes identified in a high-density genome wide association study for nicotine dependence. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16:24–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Brognard J, Sierecki E, Gao T, Newton AC. PHLPP and a second isoform, PHLPP2, differentially attenuate the amplitude of Akt signaling by regulating distinct Akt isoforms. Mol Cell. 2007;25:917–31. [PubMed]
  • Carlisle DL, Liu X, Hopkins TM, Swick MC, Dhir R, Siegfried JM. Nicotine activates cell-signaling pathways through muscle-type and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2007;20:629–41. [PubMed]
  • Chanock SJ, Manolio T, Boehnke M, Boerwinkle E, Hunter DJ, Thomas G, Hirschhorn JN, Abecasis G, Altshuler D, Bailey-Wilson JE, et al. Replicating genotype-phenotype associations. Nature. 2007;447:655–60. [PubMed]
  • Christensen K, Murray JC. What genome-wide association studies can do for medicine. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1094–7. [PubMed]
  • Chung RH, Morris RW, Zhang L, Li YJ, Martin ER. X-APL: an improved family-based test of association in the presence of linkage for the X chromosome. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80:59–68. [PubMed]
  • Colhoun HM, McKeigue PM, Davey, Smith G. Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes. Lancet. 2003;361:865–72. [PubMed]
  • Covault J, Gelernter J, Hesselbrock V, Nellissery M, Kranzler HR. Allelic and haplotypic association of GABRA2 with alcohol dependence. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2004;129:104–9. [PubMed]
  • Crawley AC, Walkley SU. Developmental analysis of CNS pathology in the lysosomal storage disease alpha-mannosidosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007;66:687–97. [PubMed]
  • Dick DM, Bierut LJ. The genetics of alcohol dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2006;8:151–7. [PubMed]
  • Ding J, Lin S, Liu Y. Monte Carlo pedigree disequilibrium test for markers on the X chromosome. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79:567–73. [PubMed]
  • Edenberg HJ, Xuei X, Chen HJ, Tian H, Wetherill LF, Dick DM, Almasy L, Bierut L, Bucholz KK, Goate A, et al. Association of alcohol dehydrogenase genes with alcohol dependence: a comprehensive analysis. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:1539–49. [PubMed]
  • Fagerstrom KO. Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment. Addict Behav. 1978;3:235–41. [PubMed]
  • Fehr C, Sander T, Tadic A, Lenzen KP, Anghelescu I, Klawe C, Dahmen N, Schmidt LG, Szegedi A. Confirmation of association of the GABRA2 gene with alcohol dependence by subtype-specific analysis. Psychiatr Genet. 2006;16:9–17. [PubMed]
  • Gelernter J, Liu X, Hesselbrock V, Page GP, Goddard A, Zhang H. Results of a genomewide linkage scan: support for chromosomes 9 and 11 loci increasing risk for cigarette smoking. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2004;128:94–101. [PubMed]
  • Gelernter J, Panhuysen C, Weiss R, Brady K, Hesselbrock V, Rounsaville B, Poling J, Wilcox M, Farrer L, Kranzler HR. Genomewide linkage scan for cocaine dependence and related traits: significant linkages for a cocaine-related trait and cocaine-induced paranoia. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2005;136:45–52. [PubMed]
  • Gelernter J, Panhuysen C, Weiss R, Brady K, Poling J, Krauthammer M, Farrer L, Kranzler HR. Genomewide linkage scan for nicotine dependence: identification of a chromosome 5 risk locus. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;61:119–26. [PubMed]
  • Gelernter J, Panhuysen C, Wilcox M, Hesselbrock V, Rounsaville B, Poling J, Weiss R, Sonne S, Zhao H, Farrer L, et al. Genomewide linkage scan for opioid dependence and related traits. Am J Hum Genet. 2006a;78:759–69. [PubMed]
  • Gelernter J, Yu Y, Weiss R, Brady K, Panhuysen C, Yang BZ, Kranzler HR, Farrer L. Haplotype spanning TTC12 and ANKK1, flanked by the DRD2 and NCAM1 loci, is strongly associated to nicotine dependence in two distinct American populations. Hum Mol Genet. 2006b;15:3498–507. [PubMed]
  • Guindalini C, Scivoletto S, Ferreira RG, Breen G, Zilberman M, Peluso MA, Zatz M. Association of genetic variants in alcohol dehydrogenase 4 with alcohol dependence in Brazilian patients. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1005–7. [PubMed]
  • Harlan JE, Hajduk PJ, Yoon HS, Fesik SW. Pleckstrin homology domains bind to phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate. Nature. 1994;371:168–70. [PubMed]
  • Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86:1119–27. [PubMed]
  • Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ. Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:95–108. [PubMed]
  • Horvath S, Xu X, Laird NM. The family based association test method: strategies for studying general genotype--phenotype associations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9:301–6. [PubMed]
  • Karkowski LM, Prescott CA, Kendler KS. Multivariate assessment of factors influencing illicit substance use in twins from female-female pairs. Am J Med Genet. 2000;96:665–70. [PubMed]
  • Kendler KS, Prescott CA. Cocaine use, abuse and dependence in a population-based sample of female twins. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;173:345–50. [PubMed]
  • Kendler KS, Jacobson KC, Prescott CA, Neale MC. Specificity of genetic and environmental risk factors for use and abuse/dependence of cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, sedatives, stimulants, and opiates in male twins. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:687–95. [PubMed]
  • Kendler KS, Thornton LM, Pedersen NL. Tobacco consumption in Swedish twins reared apart and reared together. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:886–92. [PubMed]
  • Kranzler HR, Gelernter J, O’Malley S, Hernandez-Avila CA, Kaufman D. Association of alcohol or other drug dependence with alleles of the μ opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) Alc Clin Exp Res. 1998;22:1359–1362. [PubMed]
  • Kruglyak L. Prospects for whole-genome linkage disequilibrium mapping of common disease genes. Nat Genet. 1999;22:139–44. [PubMed]
  • Lachman HM, Fann CS, Bartzis M, Evgrafov OV, Rosenthal RN, Nunes EV, Miner C, Santana M, Gaffney J, Riddick A, et al. Genomewide suggestive linkage of opioid dependence to chromosome 14q. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16:1327–34. [PubMed]
  • Lappalainen J, Krupitsky E, Remizov M, Pchelina S, Taraskina A, Zvartau E, Somberg LK, Covault J, Kranzler HR, Krystal JH, et al. Association between alcoholism and gamma-amino butyric acid alpha2 receptor subtype in a Russian population. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29:493–8. [PubMed]
  • Li MD. Identifying susceptibility loci for nicotine dependence: 2008 update based on recent genome-wide linkage analyses. Hum Genet. 2008;123:119–31. [PubMed]
  • Li MD, Ma JZ, Payne TJ, Lou XY, Zhang D, Dupont RT, Elston RC. Genome-wide linkage scan for nicotine dependence in European Americans and its converging results with African Americans in the Mid-South Tobacco Family sample. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13:407–416. [PubMed]
  • Li MD, Payne TJ, Ma JZ, Lou XY, Zhang D, Dupont RT, Crews KM, Somes G, Williams NJ, Elston RC. A genomewide search finds major susceptibility loci for nicotine dependence on chromosome 10 in African Americans. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79:745–51. [PubMed]
  • Loukola A, Broms U, Maunu H, Widen E, Heikkila K, Siivola M, Salo A, Pergadia ML, Nyman E, Sammalisto S, et al. Linkage of nicotine dependence and smoking behavior on 10q, 7q and 11p in twins with homogeneous genetic background. Pharmacogenomics J. 2007:1–11. [Epub ahead of print] [PubMed]
  • Luo X, Kranzler HR, Zhao H, Gelernter J. Haplotypes at the OPRM1 locus are associated with susceptibility to substance dependence in European-Americans. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2003;120:97–108. [PubMed]
  • Luo X, Kranzler HR, Zuo L, Lappalainen J, Yang BZ, Gelernter J. ADH4 gene variation is associated with alcohol dependence and drug dependence in European Americans: results from HWD tests and case-control association studies. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:1085–95. [PubMed]
  • Luo X, Kranzler HR, Zuo L, Wang S, Blumberg HP, Gelernter J. CHRM2 gene predisposes to alcohol dependence, drug dependence and affective disorders: results from an extended case-control structured association study. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:2421–34. [PubMed]
  • Luo X, Kranzler HR, Zuo L, Yang BZ, Lappalainen J, Gelernter J. ADH4 gene variation is associated with alcohol and drug dependence: results from family controlled and population-structured association studies. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005;15:755–68. [PubMed]
  • Ma JZ, Beuten J, Payne TJ, Dupont RT, Elston RC, Li MD. Haplotype analysis indicates an association between the DOPA decarboxylase (DDC) gene and nicotine dependence. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:1691–8. [PubMed]
  • Maes T, Barcelo A, Buesa C. Neuron navigator: a human gene family with homology to unc-53, a cell guidance gene from Caenorhabditis elegans. Genomics. 2002;80:21–30. [PubMed]
  • Maystadt I, Rezsohazy R, Barkats M, Duque S, Vannuffel P, Remacle S, Lambert B, Najimi M, Sokal E, Munnich A, et al. The nuclear factor kappaB-activator gene PLEKHG5 is mutated in a form of autosomal recessive lower motor neuron disease with childhood onset. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:67–76. [PubMed]
  • O’Connell JR, Weeks DE. PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:259–66. [PubMed]
  • Pierucci-Lagha A, Gelernter J, Chan G, Arias A, Cubells JF, Farrer L, Kranzler HR. Reliability of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria using the semi-structured assessment for drug dependence and alcoholism (SSADDA) Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;91:85–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pierucci-Lagha A, Gelernter J, Feinn R, Cubells JF, Pearson D, Pollastri A, Farrer L, Kranzler HR. Diagnostic reliability of the Semi-structured Assessment for Drug Dependence and Alcoholism (SSADDA) Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;80:303–12. [PubMed]
  • Risch N, Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science. 1996;273:1516–7. [PubMed]
  • Saccone SF, Hinrichs AL, Saccone NL, Chase GA, Konvicka K, Madden PA, Breslau N, Johnson EO, Hatsukami D, Pomerleau O, et al. Cholinergic nicotinic receptor genes implicated in a nicotine dependence association study targeting 348 candidate genes with 3713 SNPs. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16:36–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Saraswati S, Adolfsen B, Littleton JT. Characterization of the role of the Synaptotagmin family as calcium sensors in facilitation and asynchronous neurotransmitter release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:14122–7. [PubMed]
  • Skol AD, Scott LJ, Abecasis GR, Boehnke M. Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38:209–13. [PubMed]
  • Soyka M, Preuss UW, Hesselbrock V, Zill P, Koller G, Bondy B. GABA-A2 receptor subunit gene (GABRA2) polymorphisms and risk for alcohol dependence. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42:184–191. [PubMed]
  • Tabor HK, Risch NJ, Myers RM. Opinion: Candidate-gene approaches for studying complex genetic traits: practical considerations. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:391–7. [PubMed]
  • The_Welcome_Trust_Case_Control_Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature. 2007;447:661–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • True WR, Xian H, Scherrer JF, Madden PA, Bucholz KK, Heath AC, Eisen SA, Lyons MJ, Goldberg J, Tsuang M. Common genetic vulnerability for nicotine and alcohol dependence in men. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:655–61. [PubMed]
  • Tsuang MT, Lyons MJ, Eisen SA, Goldberg J, True W, Lin N, Meyer JM, Toomey R, Faraone SV, Eaves L. Genetic influences on DSM-III-R drug abuse and dependence: a study of 3,372 twin pairs. Am J Med Genet. 1996;67:473–7. [PubMed]
  • Van Steen K, McQueen MB, Herbert A, Raby B, Lyon H, Demeo DL, Murphy A, Su J, Datta S, Rosenow C, Christman M, Silverman EK, Laird NM, Weiss ST, Lange C. Genomic screening and replication using the same data set in family-based association testing. Nat Genet. 2005;37:683–691. [PubMed]
  • Wang JC, Hinrichs AL, Stock H, Budde J, Allen R, Bertelsen S, Kwon JM, Wu W, Dick DM, Rice J, et al. Evidence of common and specific genetic effects: association of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 (CHRM2) gene with alcohol dependence and major depressive syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:1903–11. [PubMed]
  • WHO. Neuroscience of psychoactive substance use and dependence. WHO; 2004.
  • Yang BZ, Kranzler HR, Zhao H, Gruen JR, Luo X, Gelernter J. Association of Haplotypic Variants in DRD2, ANKK1, TTC12 and NCAM1 to Alcohol Dependence in Independent Case-control and Family Samples. Hum Mol Genet 2007 [PubMed]
  • Yu Y, Panhuysen C, Kranzler HR, Hesselbrock V, Rounsaville B, Weiss R, Brady K, Farrer LA, Gelernter J. Intronic variants in the dopa decarboxylase (DDC) gene are associated with smoking behavior in European-Americans and African-Americans. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:2192–9. [PubMed]
  • Zhang H, Luo X, Kranzler HR, Lappalainen J, Yang BZ, Krupitsky E, Zvartau E, Gelernter J. Association between two {micro}-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) haplotype blocks and drug or alcohol dependence. Hum Mol Genet. 2006b;15:807–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zhang H, Ye Y, Wang X, Gelernter J, Ma JZ, Li MD. DOPA decarboxylase gene is associated with nicotine dependence. Pharmacogenomics. 2006a;7:1159–66. [PubMed]