We first evaluated whether there was a relationship between CSF Aβ
1-42 status and longitudinal clinical decline. Consistent with prior studies
15-17, across all participants, we found that positive CSF Aβ
1-42 status significantly correlated with change in global CDR (β
1 = 0.03, Standard Error (SE) = 0.01, p = 0.04), CDR-SB (β
1 = 0.09, SE = 0.05, p = 0.048), and ADAS-cog (β
1 = 0.59, SE = 0.23, p = 0.0098). To ensure that our results were not due to a categorical treatment of variables, we examined CSF Aβ
1-42 as a continuous variable and found significant associations between decreased CSF Aβ
1-42 levels and change in global CDR (β-coefficient = -0.0002, SE = 0.0001, p = 0.030), CDR-SB (β-coefficient = -0.0009, SE = 0.0004, p = 0.041), and ADAS-cog (β-coefficient = -0.005, SE = 0.002, p = 0.016).
We next investigated whether the presence of CSF p-tau181p influenced the relationship between CSF Aβ1-42 and longitudinal clinical decline. We found that positive CSF Aβ1-42 status was associated with change in global CDR only among CSF p-tau181p positive individuals (β1 = 0.06, SE = 0.02, p = 0.01). There was no association between CSF Aβ1-42 status and change in global CDR among CSF p-tau181p negative individuals (β1 = -0.02, SE = 0.02, p = 0.35). Similarly, we found that positive CSF Aβ1-42 status was associated with change in CDR-SB scores only among CSF p-tau181p positive individuals (β1 = 0.24, SE = 0.11, p = 0.036) (). There was no association between CSF Aβ1-42 status and change in CDR-SB scores among CSF p-tau181p negative individuals (β1 = -0.003, SE = 0.04, p = 0.94). Consistent with these results, we found that positive CSF Aβ1-42 status was associated with change in ADAS-cog scores only among CSF p-tau181p positive individuals (β1 = 0.94, SE = 0.32, p = 0.0043) (). There was no association between CSF Aβ1-42 status and change in CDR-SB scores among CSF ptau181p negative individuals (β1 = 0.41, SE = 0.34, p = 0.23).
Consistent with the results obtained from categorizing subjects on the basis of cutoff values, we found that decreased CSF Aβ1-42 levels significantly associated with change in global CDR only among CSF p-tau181p positive individuals (β-coefficient = - 0.005, SE = 0.0002, p = 0.02). Similarly, decreased CSF Aβ1-42 levels significantly associated with change in ADAS-cog scores (β-coefficient = -0.007, SE = 0.002, p = 0.0064) and showed a trend towards significant association with change in CDR-SB scores (β-coefficient = -0.002, SE = 0.001, p = 0.06) only among CSF p-tau181p positive individuals. Neither CSF p-tau181p status nor CSF p-tau181p level significantly associated with clinical decline, irrespective of CSF Aβ1-42 status.
Finally, we examined whether the presence of a nonspecific form of tau, total tau (t-tau), affected the relationship between CSF Aβ
1-42 and longitudinal clinical decline. We classified all participants based on high (“positive”, n = 22) and low (“negative”, n = 85) t-tau levels using a CSF cutoff value of 93 pg/ml.
14 We found that positive CSF Aβ
1-42 status did not associate with change in global CDR or CDR-SB either among CSF t-tau positive or negative individuals. Positive CSF Aβ
1-42 status significantly associated with change in ADAS-cog scores among CSF t-tau positive individuals (β-coefficient = 1.43, SE = 0.49, p = 0.005) and showed a trend towards significance among CSF t-tau negative individuals (β-coefficient = 0.48, SE = 0.27, p = 0.067).