PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Nature. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 February 16.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3422413
NIHMSID: NIHMS380686

Bacterial Virulence Proteins as Tools to Rewire Kinase Pathways in Yeast and Immune Cells

Abstract

Bacterial pathogens have evolved specific effector proteins that, by interfacing with host kinase signaling pathways, provide a mechanism to evade immune responses during infection1,2. Although these effectors are responsible for pathogen virulence, we realized that they might also serve as valuable synthetic biology reagents for engineering cellular behavior. Here, we have exploited two effector proteins, the Shigella flexneri OspF protein3 and Yersinia pestis YopH protein4, to systematically rewire kinase-mediated responses in both yeast and mammalian immune cells. Bacterial effector proteins can be directed to selectively inhibit specific mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways in yeast by artificially targeting them to pathway specific complexes. Moreover, we show that unique properties of the effectors generate novel pathway behaviors: OspF, which irreversibly inactivates MAPKs4, was used to construct a synthetic feedback circuit that displays novel frequency-dependent input filtering. Finally, we show that effectors can be used in T cells, either as feedback modulators to precisely tune the T cell response amplitude, or as an inducible pause switch that can temporarily disable T cell activation. These studies demonstrate how pathogens could provide a rich toolkit of parts to engineer cells for therapeutic or biotechnological applications.

Many bacterial pathogens have developed an array of effector proteins to rewire host signaling networks and down-regulate the immune response 2(Fig. 1a). Some effectors mimic host activities, such as the Yersinia pestis effector YopH, which is a highly active phosphotyrosine phosphatase3. Other effectors utilize unusual mechanisms, such as the Shigella flexneri OspF protein, which irreversibly inactivates MAP kinases by catalyzing a β-elimination reaction that removes the hydroxyl group of the key phospho-threonine side chain4.

Figure 1
Bacterial effector OspF can block selective MAP kinase pathways in yeast

MAPK pathways play a central role in diverse eukaryotic responses, ranging from immune response to cell fate decisions5,6. Thus, the ability to tune MAPK response would facilitate engineering cells for diverse therapeutic and biotechnological applications7,8. Recent work has shown that MAPK signaling dynamics in yeast can be reshaped with synthetic feedback loops that involve controlled expression and targeting of pathway modulators to appropriate signaling complexes9. Identifying effective pathway modulators is challenging, and thus we hypothesized that pathogen effector proteins may have untapped utility as components for predictably and systematically engineering signaling pathways. Here, we use the effector proteins OspF and YopH to modulate kinase signaling pathways in yeast and in human primary T cells.

We first introduced OspF into yeast. As reported10, overexpression of OspF led to growth inhibition under standard conditions, hyperosmotic stress conditions (Fig. 1b), and cell wall damaging conditions (Supplementary Fig. 1a). OspF contains a canonical docking peptide at its N-terminus that allows it to bind multiple MAPK's in yeast11. We found that expression of an OspF mutant lacking its native docking peptide (ΔN-OspF) yielded normal growth behavior under all conditions (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 1a). Next we tested whether ΔN-OspF could be redirected to a specific pathway by tagging the protein with a leucine zipper heterodimerization motif, and fusing the complementary interacting motif to Pbs2, the scaffold protein that organizes the osmolarity MAPK pathway. This targeted version of ΔN-OspF only displayed a growth defect under high salt conditions, showing that OspF activity could be engineered to inhibit a specific MAPK (Fig. 1b).

To further explore re-targeting OspF to specific pathways, we engineered yeast strains in which ΔN-OspF was selectively targeted to either the osmolarity MAPK complex or the mating MAPK complex (by targeting it to the mating pathway scaffold protein, Ste5) (Fig. 1c). Targeting of ΔN-OspF to the Pbs2 inhibited the osmolarity response but not the mating response. Conversely, when ΔN-OspF was targeted to Ste5, only the mating response was inhibited. Thus, the inhibitory activity of this effector could be selectively aimed at one of several MAPK pathways in the same cell.

One of the unique aspects of OspF is that it catalyzes an irreversible inactivation of MAPKs (unlike reversible dephosphorylation by a phosphatase). Thus MAPK activity can only be restored through new protein synthesis, which has a much slower timescale than re-phosphorylation (Fig. 2a and Fig. 2b). This longer timescale would be expected to lead to an extended refractory period after OspF action, during which the targeted MAPK pathway could no longer respond to subsequent stimuli.

Figure 2
Tuning frequency dependent response of yeast osmolarity pathway using synthetic OspF feedback loop

Computational simulations indicated that a long refractory period could result in significant changes to the frequency-dependent behavior of pathway response (Supplementary Fig. 2). There is growing evidence that cells use frequency modulation of diverse molecular events to encode and transmit information12,13. Our models indicated that with a negative feedback loop (i.e. MAPK activity induced expression of OspF) to “filter out” pathway activation, pathway output would be dampened when input periods are long enough to accumulate significant amounts of the negative effector but shorter than the refractory period (Supplementary Fig. 2).

To test if OspF could be used to filter frequency dependent inputs, we constructed a synthetic negative feedback loop in the yeast osmo-response pathway by expressing OspF targeted to the osmo-response signaling complex (ΔN-OspF-zipper) from the Hog1 responsive promoter, pSTL1 (Fig. 2c). As a comparison, we also engineered an analogous synthetic feedback loop using a reversible Hog1 MAPK inhibitory protein -- the yeast MAPK phosphatase, PTP2. Phospho-Hog1 translocation to the nucleus was used as a fast-timescale output reporter (Supplementary Fig. 3)14-16. To measure integrated output over a longer timescale, we also measured a slower timescale transcriptional reporter -- expression of mCherry from the pSTL1 promoter.

We found that the OspF-mediated negative feedback circuit altered the osmostress pathway response to intermediate frequency stimulation, but not to continuous stress or to high frequency stimulation (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig. 4a). Furthermore, in the course of stimulating cells with pulses of KCl of varying length, we discovered that an input period of ~16 minutes (intermediate frequency) leads to highly divergent transcriptional responses (Fig. 2d). Examination of Hog1 nuclear import in the OspF feedback strain shows that after 3 pulses, the amount of Hog1 competent for nuclear localization has decreased to near zero, consistent with a model in which - in this timeframe - there is sufficient OspF to inactivate the bulk of the Hog1 population and to now render the cells refractory to further pulses of stimulation. The cells containing a PTP2 negative feedback circuit do not show this dramatic filtering at this frequency. With higher frequency stimulation (2 min period), the three strains also do not significantly differ from each other in response, presumably because there is inadequate activation time with each pulse to build up a sufficient concentration of effector17.

A broad frequency dependence analysis shows that the wild-type osmo-response pathway functions as a band pass filter, with maximal response at intermediate frequencies, while the engineered pathway more closely resembles a low pass filter, with maximal responses at low frequency (Fig. 2e). These distinct frequency filtering behaviors fit those predicted by computational simulations (Supplementary Fig. 2d).

We then sought to test whether these bacterial effectors could be used to rewire signaling in immune cells. Human T cells are an attractive synthetic biology platform because they can be isolated from patients, genetically engineered ex vivo, and then transferred back into patients to treat cancer and chronic infection18,19. While promising, the therapeutic application of engineered T cells carry risks of adverse side effects including inadvertent autoimmune-like attack of off-target host tissues20,21. Thus mechanisms to control the specificity, amplitude and timing of T cell function are critical to balance therapeutic action against off-target toxicity.

Both OspF and YopH can modify the T cell receptor (TCR) pathway (Fig. 3a). OspF inactivates the MAPK ERK, which is a central component of TCR signaling4,22, while YopH dephosphorylates phospho-tyrosine, including the T cell scaffold proteins LAT and SLP-7623. Constitutive expression of YopH and OspF in Jurkat T cells leads to severe inhibition of TCR activation, as measured by an NFAT transcriptional reporter24 (Fig. 3a) (as well as other reporters of T cell activation –Supplementary Fig. 5a). Expression of the catalytic dead versions of YopH and OspF had no effect on the TCR activation (Supplementary Fig. 5b). In addition, we showed that these two effectors clearly target distinct steps of the T cell activation pathway, since induction of the T cells with the combination of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin, which activates the T cell downstream of the PLCγ1-LAT/SLP76 dependent response, bypassed YopH inhibition25, but was sensitive to OspF inhibition (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 5a). Thus, distinct pathogen effector proteins can be used to block this pathway at particular steps, much like a specific small molecule inhibitor.

Figure 3
OspF can be used to precisely control T cell activation amplitude and duration in Jurkat T cells

Given the ability of OspF and YopH to modulate T cell responses, we sought to use these proteins to build circuits that could, in principle, improve the safety of therapeutic T cells. In adoptive T cell therapy, a challenge is to limit over-activation or off-target activation of T cells that could lead to killing of host cells or to cytokine storm – a life-threatening immune response. One approach is to incorporate a safety “kill switch”26-28 into the T cells, such as the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV TK) gene. This protein converts the pro-drug ganciclovir into an inhibitor of replication, thus killing cells expressing the gene. While HSV TK is currently being tested in a phase III clinical trial for the treatment of graft vs. host disease in bone marrow transplants, this strategy irreversibly destroys the engineered, adoptively transferred cells29. Thus instead of killing the engineered cells, we sought to design circuits that would limit the amplitude of the T cell response or to temporarily pause T cell activity.

We first tested whether bacterial effectors could be used to limit the response amplitude of Jurkat T cells. Negative feedback loops can act to limit the maximal amplitude of a response30, so we engineered a library of negative feedback loops in which the OspF and YopH were expressed from a series of TCR responsive promoters of varying strength (AP1 and NFAT) (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 7). For further tuning of feedback parameters, we also tagged effectors with degradation sequences (PEST motif) that reduce half-life of the effectors. This series of negative feedback loops led to controlled reduction of the maximal response amplitude of T cell activation (Fig. 3b). Moreover, the amplitude could be tuned systematically by varying feedback promoter strength and effector stability (Supplementary Fig. 7b). For example, expression of OspF from the strong feedback (pNFAT) promoter leads to a very low maximal response amplitude, but this effect could be systematically tuned by destabilizing the OspF effector with a PEST tag.

We also tested whether the bacterial effectors could be used to construct pause switches, which could transiently and reversibly, disable T cells. We placed the effectors under the control of a tetracycline inducible promoter (pTRE), which allowed external control of the timing of effector expression with the addition of doxycycline. Effectors were fused to a destabilization domain so that they would be rapidly degraded once doxycycline is removed. Using this system, we first showed that transient expression of bacterial effectors can inhibit TCR signaling after the pathway is activated in Jurkat T cells (Fig. 3c). TCR signaling can be inhibited up to 6 hours after activation using this approach (Supplementary Fig. 8b). Finally, we showed that engineered T cells can be subjected to cycles of TCR activation, pausing with a short period of induced expression of the bacterial effector, and then reactivated after this pause (Supplementary Fig. 8c).

We then tested the pause switch in a clinically important cell type for adoptive immunotherapy - primary human CD4+ T cells (in contrast to the Jurkat T cell line, which does not require cytokine or TCR activation to stimulate proliferation). We showed that when OspF is induced by the addition of doxycycline, both IL-2 release and cell proliferation were inhibited in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4b, 4c). Activation of the TCR by anti-CD3/CD28 and antigen presenting cells can also be inhibited by expression of OspF (Supplementary Fig. 9a). Moreover, after dox is removed, IL-2 release and cell division recovers within 6-18 hours (Fig. 4d, 4e). Sustained dox exposure can inhibit T cell activity over the course of several days (Fig. 4e) without having any significant effect on cell viability (Supplementary Fig. 9c). Thus this work provides a proof of principle for the design of a simple “pause” switch that could allow external control over the timing and level of T cell activation and cytokine release, in order to minimize adverse events associated with adoptive immunotherapy such as cytokine storm.

Figure 4
OspF can be used as a synthetic pause switch to control human primary CD4+ T cell activation

Most work on bacterial pathogen effector proteins has the long-term aim of neutralizing the pathogens’ infectious capabilities. We have shown, however, that bacterial effectors can also be valuable synthetic biology tools, because of their unique biochemical properties. We have employed bacterial effectors to modulate MAPK signaling in yeast to generate novel time-dependent dynamics. We also showed that bacterial effectors can be used to flexibly tune human T cell receptor signaling dynamics, with potential application as safety switches for adoptive immunotherapy. The vast array of bacterial pathogen effector proteins, beyond those studied here, holds promise as a rich and important source of parts for the cellular engineering toolkit.

METHODS SUMMARY

Flow cytometry experiments

Analysis of the pathway-dependent fluorescent proteins (GFP and mCherry) expression in yeast cells and phosphorylated ERK in Jurkat T cells were preformed with the BD LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) equipped with a high-throughput sampler. 1.5 μM of α-factor (GenScript) or 0.4 M of KCl were added into yeast cultures to induce separately the mating-specific or osmo-specific pathway response. For staining of phosphorylated ERK in Jurkat T cell, cells were fixed, made permeable by incubation with ice-cold 90% methanol on ice for 30 minutes and stained with primary antibody to phosphorylated ERK (Cell Signaling) and anti-rabbit APC secondary antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch).

Microfluidics and fluorescent microscopy

Mircofluidic yeast cell culture was performed in Y04C plate with ONIX flow control system (Cellasic Corp). Cells were loaded into the flow chamber pre-coated with concanavalin A. Pulse stimulation with salt media was performed by ONIX FG flow control software (Cellasic Corp) with the flow pressure of 8 psi. Image acquisition was performed with a TE2000-E automated inverted microscope (Nikon) with Perfect Focus and 100x oil immersion lens. The image analysis for both nuclear Hog1-GFP import and pSTL1-mCherry expression was performed with custom Matlab (Mathworks) software.

Human T cell activation assay

Resting human primary CD4+ cells (transduced with the pause switch constructs or untransduced) were pretreated with 200 ng/ml doxycycline for 6 hours. 50, 000 cells were placed in a 96-well plate with 200 μL human growth media with activation agents added (10 ng/mL PMA + 0.5 μM ionomycin, magnetic Dynabeads coated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 (beads/cells ratio, 0.3:1)). After 24 hours of incubation at 37°C, the released IL-2 in the supernatant was measured with the human IL-2 ELISA kit II (BD Biosciences). Cells labeled with CellTrace Violet dye (Invitrogen) were assayed by flow cytometry after 4 days incubation to quantitate cell proliferation.

METHODS

Yeast constructs and strains

All yeast constructs used in this study (Supplementary Table 1) were cloned using a combinatorial cloning strategy based on the Type II restriction enzyme AarI developed by Peisajovich et al.31. For the MAPK pathway specific inhibitory experiments, strains WP022 and WP116 were constructed from the W303-derived strain SP147 (Supplementary Table 2) by tagging the C-terminal of endogenous Pbs2 or Ste5 with leucine zipper respectively. To construct WP039 for measuring the nuclear Hog1 accumulation, the C-terminal of endogenous Hog1 in wild type W303 strain was tagged with GFP using standard integration technique. For the visualization of the nucleus, a histone protein Htb2 was C-terminally tagged with mCherry, expressed from the ADH1 promoter, and integrated at TRP1 locus. Endogenous Pbs2 was tagged with a leucine zipper by PCR integration and was used in synthetic feedback loops. Synthetic effector gene cassettes were integrated at the LEU2 locus. Yeast promoters, terminator, and the PTP2 gene were PCR amplified from Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic DNA (Invitrogen). YopH gene was a kind gift from Kim Orth. The OspF gene was synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. All yeast genomic integrations were confirmed by yeast colony PCR.

Yeast flow cytometry experiments

Analysis of the pathway-dependent fluorescent proteins (GFP and mCherry) expression in yeast cells was preformed with the BD LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) equipped with a high-throughput sampler. For each experiment, triplicate cultures were grown in synthetic complete media to early log phase (OD600 = 0.1 – 0.2). At time = 0, 1.5 μM of α-factor (GenScript) or 0.4 M of KCl were added into parallel cultures to induce separately the mating- specific or osmo-specific pathway response. For mating response, 100 μL aliquots were taken at time = 0 and after 2 hours of induction; for osmotic response, 100 μL aliquots were taken at time = 0 and after 1 hour of induction. Each 100 μL sample aliquot was immediately mixed with 100 μL of cycloheximide (10 μg/mL) in 96-well plates to stop the protein synthesis. After incubating the samples at room temperature for 30 minutes in the dark to allow for the maturation of fluorescent proteins, the levels of fluorescence protein were determined by flow cytometry. For each read, 10,000 cells were counted, and the mean fluorescent density was calculated by Flowjo software (BD Biosciences) as the pathway output value and the standard deviation from triplicate experiments was indicated as the error bar.

Yeast microfluidics, fluorescent microscopy, and image processing

Mircofluidic yeast cell culture was performed in Y04C plate with ONIX flow control system (Cellasic Corp)32. Cultures were grown to mid-log phase (OD600 = 0.2 – 0.8) in synthetic complete media. Cells were diluted to OD600 = 0.01 in 600 μL of fresh media and sonicated at a minimum set of 11% for 1 sec using Fisher Scientific model 500 sonicator with a 2 mm tip. Cells were loaded into the flow chamber pre-coated with concanavalin A and flowed over by synthetic complete media for more than 20 min before applying the square pulse sequence. Pulse stimulation with salt media was performed by ONIX FG flow control software (Cellasic Corp) with the flow pressure of 8 psi. Image acquisition was performed with a TE2000-E automated inverted microscope (Nikon) with Perfect Focus and 100x oil immersion lens.

Background subtraction was performed first on all fluorescence images using ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov). The subsequent image analysis for both nuclear Hog1-GFP import and pSTL1-mCherry expression was performed with custom Matlab (Mathworks) software (developed by Kai-Yeung Lau from Chao Tang's lab at UCSF). For Hog1-GFP import analysis, cell boundaries were first determined from the bright field DIC images. Cell nuclei were segmented by mCherry labeled nuclear images. The nuclear and total cell GFP densities were calculated from the GFP fluorescent images. For pSTL1-mCherry expression, cell boundaries were determined the same way Hog1-GFP localization and mCherry densities were determined from the mCherry fluorescent images. For all frequency responses, 210 min long time course of pulse stimulation was performed and the maximum value of each time course was taken as the output of the stimulation frequency. The population average of over 50 - 100 cells was determined for each single measurement, and each experiment was repeated at least three times (see also Supplemental Fig. 3c and 3d) and the standard deviation was calculated with the three repeats.

Jurkat T cell lines, plasmids, and transfection

Jurkat T cell with pNFAT-EGFP (Neomycin resistant) stably integrated into the chromosome is a Weiss lab stock strain. All plasmids were made by using standard cloning techniques, AarI combinatorial cloning technique31 and Gateway cloning technique (Invitrogen). See Supplementary Tables for more cloning detail. Jurkat cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat inactivated (HI) FBS (Invitrogen), extra L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin, streptomycin, and G418 (2mg/mL, Invitrogen).

For transfection, Jurkat T cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and glutamine (10G RPMI) for at least 1 day. 20 million cells were spun down, washed once with 10G RPMI, and resuspended in 300ul of 10G RPMI. 15μg of each plasmid was added to each transfection, vortexed briefly, and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes. The cell/DNA mixture was then subject to electroporation (BioRad, square pulse, 300V, 10ms pulse, 0.4 cm cuvette). The cells were rested at room temperature for 10 minutes before resuspending in 10mL of 10G RPMI. The cells were allowed to recover overnight before performing further experiment. For transfection with plasmids that contain the pTRE promoter, the serum was switched to Tet-free serum (Clontech).

T cell activation and doxycycline induction

T cell receptor was activated with a Jurkat specific anti-TCR antibody, C305 (ascites, UCSF antibody core) at 1:2000 dilution unless stated other wise at the cell density of 2.5million cell/mL (for most experiment) or 0.5 million cells/mL (for Dox inducible expression (100nM) of effectors experiment). Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (25ng/mL) and ionomycin (1μM) was also used to activate T cell in some experiment. For the dose response curve, the highest dose of C305 is 1:600 and serially diluted 3 fold to generate 8 doses total.

T cell antibody staining and flow cytometry analysis

For staining of cell surface expression of CD69, cells were fixed, and stained with anti-CD69-APC (BD). For staining of phosphorylated ERK, cells were fixed, made permeable by incubation with ice-cold 90% methanol on ice for 30 minutes and stained with primary antibody to phosphorylated ERK (4370 Cell Signaling) and anti-rabbit APC secondary antibody (711-136-152, Jackson Immunoresearch). All samples were analyzed with BD LSRII equipped with high throughput sampler. Live cells were determined from forward and side scattering. Transfected cells were determined by comparing cells without mCherry to cells transfected with pEF-mCherry. Only transfected and live cells were included in the analysis. Error bar represents the standard deviation from three samples.

Western blot to determine protein expression level

1 million live cells were quickly spun down and lysed on ice for 30min. The supernatant were then spun down at 4°C for 30 min. The lysates were then mixed with DTT and SDS sample loading buffer and boiled for 3 minutes. Samples were separated with SDS PAGE gel (4-12% Bis-Tris) and then transferred to nitrocellulose blot. The blot were stained with primary anti-HA antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and Li-Cor anti-mouse 680 LT secondary antibody. The blot was imaged with the Li-Cor Odyssey.

Human primary CD4+ T cell transduction

Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from normal donors and acquired as cell suspensions from flushed TRIMA leukoreduction chambers (Blood Centers of the Pacific, San Francisco, CA). Primary CD4+ T cells were purified by negative selection and Ficoll-Paque PLUS density medium separation (RosetteSep, Stem Cell Technologies). Purified cells were cryopreserved and placed in liquid nitrogen storage.

Replication-incompetent lentiviral particles were prepared in 293T cells by standard methods. Briefly, constructs of interest were cloned into the transfer vector pHR'SIN:CSW using standard molecular biology techniques and then co-transfected into 293T cells along with the viral packaging plasmids pCMVdR8.91 and pMD2.G using the transfection reagent FuGENE HD (Roche). Amphotropic VSV-G pseudotyped lentiviral particles in the supernatant were collected 48 hours later.

Prior to use, human primary CD4+ T cells were thawed and cultured overnight in growth medium (X-VIVO 15 + 5% human AB serum + 10mM N-acetylcysteine + 1X beta-mercaptoethanol + 1X Primocin) supplemented with 30U/mL IL-2. The next day, cells were activated with Dynabeads human T-Activator CD3/CD28 (Invitrogen) at a 3:1 beads-to-cells ratio. After 24 hours of activation, the cells were transduced with lentiviral particles. In some cases, transduction was performed on RetroNectin-coated tissue culture plates to enhance viability and transduction efficiency. Briefly, non-tissue culture treated plates were coated with RetroNectin (32μg/mL) and then blocked with PBS + 2% BSA. Viral supernatant was loaded into the wells and the plate was centrifuged at 1,200g for 1.5 hours at room temperature. Finally, wells were washed once with PBS, activated T cells were loaded into the wells, and the plate was once again centrifuged at 1,200g for 1 hour with reduced braking speed. T cells were then placed into the 37°C incubator.

IL-2 release assay

Transduced cells were rested by culturing them for greater than 10 days in the presence of 30U/mL IL-2 added every other day for maintenance. Doxycycline (200 ng/mL) was added to the cells and the cells were incubated for 6 hours. Cells were washed and 5e4 human primary CD4+ cells (transduced with the pause switch constructs or untransduced) were placed in a 96-well plate with 200 μL human growth media with activation agents added (10 ng/mL PMA + 0.5 μM ionomycin, magnetic Dynabeads coated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 (beads/cells ratio, 0.3:1), or Raji B cells loaded with a superantigen cocktail). Doxycycline (200ng/mL) was added into appropriate wells. After 24 hours of incubation at 37C, the released IL-2 in the supernatant was measured with the human IL-2 ELISA kit II (BD Biosciences).

Human primary CD4+ T cell proliferation assay

Resting primary CD4+ T cells were pretreated with 200 ng/ml doxycycline for 6 hours and then labeled with CellTrace Violet dye (Invitrogen). 5×104 dye-labeled human CD4+ T cells were placed in a 96-well plate with 200 μL human growth media in the presence or absence of doxycycline (200ng/mL) and Dynabeads coated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 (beads/cells ratio, 0.3:1) to induce proliferation. After incubation at 37C for 4 days, the cells were assayed by flow cytometry. FlowJo curve fitting software was used to quantitate cell proliferation as indicated by dilution of the CellTrace Violet dye in proliferating cells.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Orth for the YopH plasmid; K. McNally and S. Neou for tissue culture support; H. El-Samad, C. Voigt, C. Tang and the Lim lab for helpful discussions. We acknowledge the 2007 UCSF iGEM team (M. Chen, E. Chou, J. Huang, L. Jann, E. Meltzer, A. Ng, and R. Ovadia) for their initial work on bacterial effectors in yeast. Supported by an American Cancer Society fellowship (W.W.W), a Li Foundation Fellowship (P.W.), a California Institute for Regenerative Medicine fellowship (Grant Number TG2-01153) (J.S.P.), NIH grants PN2EY016546, RO1GM055040, RO1GM062583, and P50GM081879 (W.A.L.), the NSF Synthetic Biology and Engineering Research Center (W.A.L.), the Packard Foundation (W.A.L.), and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (A.W. and W.A.L.).

Current Addresses

W.W. Wong – Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University. ude.ub@gnowliw

E.E. Corcoran – Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Northwest Permanente PC. gro.pk@narocroC.E.nahtE

S.G. Peisajovich –Department of Cell & Systems Biology, University of Toronto. ac.otnorotu@hcivojasiep.oigres

Author Contributions

P.W., S.P. and W.L. initiated project in yeast. W.W, E.C. A.W, and W.L initiated the project in T cells. P.W., W.W. and W.L wrote the paper. P.W. and S.P. performed the experiments in yeast. W.W, P.W., E.C., J.O. and J.P performed the experiment in T cells.

Author Information

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests. Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of this article at www.nature.com/nature.

Full Methods and any associated references are available in the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature.

Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature.

References

1. Ribet D, Cossart P. Pathogen-mediated posttranslational modifications: A re-emerging field. Cell. 2010;143(5):694–702. [PubMed]
2. Broberg CA, Orth K. Tipping the balance by manipulating post-translational modifications. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13(1):34–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Zhang ZY, et al. Expression, purification, and physicochemical characterization of a recombinant Yersinia protein tyrosine phosphatase. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(33):23759–23766. [PubMed]
4. Li H, et al. The phosphothreonine lyase activity of a bacterial type III effector family. Science. 2007;315(5814):1000–1003. [PubMed]
5. Shaw AS, Filbert EL. Scaffold proteins and immune-cell signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(1):47–56. [PubMed]
6. Dong C, Davis RJ, Flavell RA. MAP kinases in the immune response. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:55–72. [PubMed]
7. Khalil AS, Collins JJ. Synthetic biology: applications come of age. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(5):367–379. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Purnick PE, Weiss R. The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(6):410–422. [PubMed]
9. Bashor CJ, Helman NC, Yan S, Lim WA. Using engineered scaffold interactions to reshape MAP kinase pathway signaling dynamics. Science. 2008;319(5869):1539–1543. [PubMed]
10. Kramer RW, et al. Yeast functional genomic screens lead to identification of a role for a bacterial effector in innate immunity regulation. PLoS pathogens. 2007;3(2):e21. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Zhu Y, et al. Structural insights into the enzymatic mechanism of the pathogenic MAPK phosphothreonine lyase. Molecular cell. 2007;28(5):899–913. [PubMed]
12. Nelson DE, et al. Oscillations in NF-kappaB signaling control the dynamics of gene expression. Science. 2004;306(5696):704–708. [PubMed]
13. Cai L, Dalal CK, Elowitz MB. Frequency-modulated nuclear localization bursts coordinate gene regulation. Nature. 2008;455(7212):485–490. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Muzzey D, Gomez-Uribe CA, Mettetal JT, van Oudenaarden A. A systems-level analysis of perfect adaptation in yeast osmoregulation. Cell. 2009;138(1):160–171. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Mettetal JT, Muzzey D, Gomez-Uribe C, van Oudenaarden A. The frequency dependence of osmo-adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 2008;319(5862):482–484. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Hersen P, McClean MN, Mahadevan L, Ramanathan S. Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(20):7165–7170. [PubMed]
17. Pelet S, et al. Transient activation of the HOG MAPK pathway regulates bimodal gene expression. Science. 2011;332(6030):732–735. [PubMed]
18. Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA. Adoptive cell therapy: genetic modification to redirect effector cell specificity. Cancer J. 2010;16(4):336–341. [PubMed]
19. June CH, Blazar BR, Riley JL. Engineering lymphocyte subsets: tools, trials and tribulations. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(10):704–716. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Morgan RA, et al. Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Mol Ther. 2010;18(4):843–851. [PubMed]
21. Brentjens R, Yeh R, Bernal Y, Riviere I, Sadelain M. Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with genetically targeted autologous T cells: case report of an unforeseen adverse event in a phase I clinical trial. Mol Ther. 2010;18(4):666–668. [PubMed]
22. Arbibe L, et al. An injected bacterial effector targets chromatin access for transcription factor NF-kappaB to alter transcription of host genes involved in immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2007;8(1):47–56. [PubMed]
23. Gerke C, Falkow S, Chien YH. The adaptor molecules LAT and SLP-76 are specifically targeted by Yersinia to inhibit T cell activation. J Exp Med. 2005;201(3):361–371. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Lin J, Weiss A. The tyrosine phosphatase CD148 is excluded from the immunologic synapse and down-regulates prolonged T cell signaling. J Cell Biol. 2003;162(4):673–682. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Yao T, Mecsas J, Healy JI, Falkow S, Chien Y. Suppression of T and B lymphocyte activation by a Yersinia pseudotuberculosis virulence factor, yopH. J Exp Med. 1999;190(9):1343–1350. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Kieback E, Charo J, Sommermeyer D, Blankenstein T, Uckert W. A safeguard eliminates T cell receptor gene-modified autoreactive T cells after adoptive transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(2):623–628. [PubMed]
27. de Witte MA, et al. An inducible caspase 9 safety switch can halt cell therapy-induced autoimmune disease. J Immunol. 2008;180(9):6365–6373. [PubMed]
28. Bonini C, et al. The suicide gene therapy challenge: how to improve a successful gene therapy approach. Mol Ther. 2007;15(7):1248–1252. [PubMed]
29. Ciceri F, et al. Infusion of suicide-gene-engineered donor lymphocytes after family haploidentical haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation for leukaemia (the TK007 trial): a non-randomised phase I-II study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):489–500. [PubMed]
30. Brandman O, et al. Feedback loops shape cellular signals in space and time. Science. 2008;322(5900):390–395. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Peisajovich SG, Garbarino JE, Wei P, Lim WA. Rapid diversification of cell signaling phenotypes by modular domain recombination. Science. 2010;328(5976):368–372. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Lee PJ, Helman NC, Lim WA, Hung PJ. A microfluidic system for dynamic yeast cell imaging. BioTechniques. 2008;44(1):91–95. [PubMed]