PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Cytometry A. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 June 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3418807
NIHMSID: NIHMS363148

OMIP-008: Measurement of Th1 and Th2 cytokine polyfunctionality of human T cells

Abstract

Purpose and Appropriate Sample Types

This panel was optimized to assess CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses to various tumor antigens from melanoma patients. The panel was tested on single-cell derived T cell isolates (SCD-T) and T cell lines derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from melanoma patients, T cell lines from the tumor environment of melanoma patients, and fresh and cryopreserved PBMC (healthy donors). Staining can be performed in 96-well plates for high-throughput.

Keywords: Immunophenotype, T cells, intracellular cytokine staining, melanoma

Background

The T cell response to human melanoma is broad, encompassing both effector and regulatory T cell populations with diverse functional profiles (1). Tumor specific T cells with cytokine profiles that do not follow the standard Th1/Th2 dichotomy have been demonstrated (2,3). These descriptions include tumor antigen-specific effector and regulatory T cells that co-produce Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Thus, immunological monitoring of T cells from melanoma patients needs to assess a wide spectrum of functions and often has access to only a limited number of cells. To provide a tool for this immunological monitoring, we developed a panel of Ab-conjugates for assessing cytokine profiles that cross “traditional” T cell subset boundaries. As such, this panel would be useful for those interested in human T cells with a mixed cytokine profile, such as induced regulatory T cells, IL-10+ CD8+ T cells, T cells involved in allergic responses, etc. Further, it should be useful for samples with limited cell numbers, such as tumor biopsies, fine-needle aspirations, or cerebral spinal fluid, as well as samples from which multiple separate samples for Th1 versus Th2 intracellular cytokine staining are not possible. This panel was developed following guidelines described previously (4). To maximize sensitivity, the brightest fluorochromes were reserved for IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-αA dump channel was used to exclude dead cells, B cells, and monocytes/macrophages. Next, testing a collection of Ab-conjugates optimized the differentiation of T cell subsets. APC-Cy7 and Quantum dot (QD) 605 were selected for discrimination of CD4 and CD8, respectively, because of their stability in this panel.

CD3 was labeled after fixing and permeabilizing the cells to ensure that activated T cells having down-regulated their TCR/CD3 complex were included in the analysis (4). To permit resolution of CD4 following activation of T cells with PMA and ionomycin (used as a mitogenic control), CD4 was also labeled post-fixation/permeabilization for all samples. Specificity of the cytokine staining is demonstrated by reduced staining following blocking steps prior to intracellular staining with the fluorochrome-conjugated anti-cytokine reagents: i) the surface-stained, fixed and permeabilized cells are blocked with purified anti-cytokine antibodies of the identical clones; and ii) the fluorochrome-conjugated reagents are blocked with recombinant human cytokine. These blocking steps typically reduce cytokine+ staining to background levels, or to a level allowing unambiguous gate setting, and as such these fully stained and blocked samples are used to determine placement of cytokine+ gates. This provides an alternative to individual FMO controls for each cytokine, which may not be feasible due to limited cell numbers from patient samples. The level of autofluorescence of the T cell lines has not been a substantial confounder in these experiments and we have not noted marked differences between the autofluorescence of cultured as compared to uncultured T cells from healthy donors.

Human Subjects

The Health Sciences Institutional Review Board that serves both the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital and the University of Wisconsin-Madison approved this study (Human Subjects Protocol # 1992-031). Written informed consent was obtained from the participants in this study.

Similarity to Published OMIPs

OMIP-001 was designed to detect cytokine-producing T cells, including IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-α (5). Our panel extends OMIP-001 with the addition of IL-4 and IL-10, thus broadening its potential application for the discrimination of T cells exhibiting traditional Th1 and Th2 responses, as well as those with unconventional cytokine profiles.

Figure 1Figure 1Figure 1
Gating strategy and example staining. A. Cells in the singlet gate are selected, live CD3+ CD14 CD19 cells identified, followed by exclusion of dye aggregates (grey box) and after gating on small lymphocytes, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are ...
Table 1
Summary table for application of OMIP-008
Table 2
Reagents used for OMIP-008

Supplementary Material

Supp Fig 2a

Supp Fig 2b

Supp Fig 3a

Supp Fig 3b

Supp Fig 4a

Supp Fig 4b

Supp Fig 5

Supp Fig 6a

Supp Fig 6b

Supp Fig 7

Supp Fig S1a

Supp Fig S1b

Supp Material

Acknowledgments

Grant Sponsors: This material is based on work supported by the Office of Research and Development, Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs; grant P30 CA014520 from the National Cancer Institute; the Gretchen and Andrew Dawes Melanoma Research Fund; Ann’s Hope Foundation; the Jay Van Sloan Memorial from the Steve Leuthold Family; and the Tim Eagle Memorial.

Footnotes

The authors have no financial or other conflicts of interests to disclose related to this publication. The contents do not represent the views of the Dept. of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

References

1. Appay V, Jandus C, Voelter V, Reynard S, Coupland SE, Rimoldi D, Lienard D, Guillaume P, Krieg AM, Cerottini JC, Romero P, Leyvraz S, Rufer N, Speiser DE. New generation vaccine induces effective melanoma-specific CD8+ T cells in the circulation but not in the tumor site. J Immunol. 2006;177:1670–1678. [PubMed]
2. Wang HY, Lee DA, Peng G, Guo Z, Li Y, Kiniwa Y, Shevach EM, Wang RF. Tumor-specific human CD4+ regulatory T cells and their ligands: implications for immunotherapy. Immunity. 2004;20:107–118. [PubMed]
3. Kyte JA, Trachsel S, Risberg B, thor Straten P, Lislerud K, Gaudernack G. Unconventional cytokine profiles and development of T cell memory in long-term survivors after cancer vaccination. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009;58:1609–1626. [PubMed]
4. McLaughlin BE, Baumgarth N, Bigos M, Roederer M, De Rosa SC, Altman JD, Nixon DF, Ottinger J, Oxford C, Evans TG, Asmuth DM. Nine-color flow cytometry for accurate measurement of T cell subsets and cytokine responses. Part I: Panel design by an empiric approach. Cytometry A. 2008;73A:400–410. [PubMed]
5. Mahnke YD, Roederer M. OMIP-001: Quality and phenotype of Ag-responsive human T-cells. Cytometry A. 2010;77A:819–820. [PubMed]