Foxp3 regulatory T (Treg) cells maintain both peripheral and mucosal homeostasis throughout the lifespan of the host (
Josefowicz and Rudensky, 2009;
Kim et al., 2007). Treg cells typically develop during thymic selection processes; however, they also develop extra-thymically in response to chronic antigen stimulation or exposure to environmental and food antigen at mucosal sites (
Curotto de Lafaille and Lafaille, 2009). Development of inducible Treg (iTreg) cells, but not thymic derived Treg, requires transcription factor binding to the intronic enhancer element (enhancer-1) of the foxp3 locus, also known as conserved non-coding sequence 1 (CNS1). iTreg development is also dependent on several soluble mediators, including: TGF-β, IL-2 and, as recent data demonstrate, RA (
Hall et al., 2011;
Knoechel et al., 2005;
Kretschmer et al., 2005;
Mucida et al., 2005;
Tone et al., 2008;
Zheng et al., 2010).
The insight that RA served as a cofactor in the generation of iTreg cells stemmed from in vitro findings that relative to splenic DCs, mln and Lp DCs potently induced iTreg cell differentiation in the presence of TGF-β (
Coombes et al., 2007;
Mucida et al., 2007;
Sun et al., 2007). Separation of mln DCs and Lp DCs based on CD103 expression revealed that the CD103
+ subsets were specifically able to yield iTreg cells in the absence of exogenous factors, implying that RA signaling potentially contributed to this process (
Coombes et al., 2007;
Sun et al., 2007). Indeed, a pan RAR antagonist strongly inhibited iTreg cell generation (
Coombes et al., 2007;
Mucida et al., 2007;
Sun et al., 2007).
Blockade of TGF-β in cocultures with CD103
+ GALT DCs also diminished iTreg cell generation. The coordinate ability of GALT DCs to produce both RA and TGF-β may involve conditioning signals from RA during developmental maturation (
Feng et al., 2010) (). Assessment of DCs in a retinoic acid response reporter mouse revealed abundant RAR binding activity in GALT CD103
+ DCs (
Jaensson-Gyllenback et al., 2011). The level of RAR binding activity in DCs from several tissues correlated with both the concentration of retinol and the percentage of CD103
+ DCs expressing RALDH2 in those tissues, which suggests that DC conditioning by RA may occur in situ. Furthermore, GALT CD103
+ DCs highly expressed mRNA for the gene encoding RAR α, implicating this receptor as a dominant mediator of such conditioning signals (
Jaensson-Gyllenback et al., 2011).
The addition of RA to cocultures with splenic DCs and TGF-β also dramatically enhanced iTreg induction (
Benson et al., 2007;
Mucida et al., 2007;
Mucida et al., 2009;
Sun et al., 2007). This effect was dependent on T cell expression of RARα (
Hill et al., 2008), which was upregulated upon stimulation in the presence of TGF-β (
Schambach et al., 2007). Remarkably, exogenous RA could sustain iTreg generation in conditions that typically opposed it, such as the presence of certain inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-21) and high costimulatory environments (
Benson et al., 2007;
Mucida et al., 2007;
Xiao et al., 2008). Stimulation of CD4
+ T cells in the presence of TGF-β was revealed to induce IL-6R expression, which addition of RA reversed (
Hill et al., 2008;
Xiao et al., 2008) (). Since RA did not appear to enhance the inherently unstable phenotype of iTreg (
Floess et al., 2007;
Hill et al., 2008), RA mediated repression of IL-6R could potentially explain why iTreg cells generated in the presence of RA were reportedly more stable in vivo following adoptive transfer (
Benson et al., 2007). Corroborating in vitro findings, the generation of iTreg cells in response to antigen feeding was abrogated in animals deficient in vitamin A and, therefore, lacking RA (
Hall et al., 2011).
Oral tolerance - the active suppression of inflammatory responses to food and other orally ingested antigens - is critically dependent on the generation of iTreg cells (
Curotto de Lafaille et al., 2008;
Weiner et al., 2011). Recent evidence indicates that in addition to supporting iTreg differentiation, RA mediated trafficking is required for a sustained expansion of iTreg cells in the gut (
Hadis et al., 2011). This expansion is propagated through IL-10 mediated interactions with resident CD103
neg APCs. In previous studies similar interactions were shown to contribute to both the induction and maintenance of Treg cells (
Denning et al., 2007;
Murai et al., 2009). Altogether, these findings indicate that RA signaling is a keystone in the development of oral tolerance.
In the absence of RA, other mechanisms may compensate for the loss of these tolerogenic processes. For instance, elevated frequencies of Foxp3
neg IL-10
+ Tr1 cells have been reported in vitamin A deficient mice and could be generated in vitro in the presence of RAR antagonists and DC induced microbial production of IL-6 and IL-21 (
Maynard et al., 2009). Despite the importance of RA for generation of iTreg cells, neither the frequency nor absolute numbers of Treg cells were reduced during vitamin A deficiency (
Hall et al., 2011). Thymic Treg cell differentiation was also intact in
Rara−/− animals (
Hill et al., 2008). Although these findings suggest that there are distinct requirements for inducible versus thymic derived Treg, it still remains unclear whether intrathymic Treg differentiation and regulatory function is impacted in the absence of RA.
In vivo requirements notwithstanding, RA was insufficient to induce Foxp3 in the absence of TGF-β (
Benson et al., 2007;
Mucida et al., 2007;
Sun et al., 2007). These findings imply that responsiveness to TGF-β is prerequisite for RA to access Foxp3 differentiation programs. In this regard, blockade of TGF-β RI kinase activity, which inhibits TGF-β-induced Smad2/3 phosphorylation (
Sorrentino et al., 2008), diminished TGF-β mediated iTreg generation and abrogated the additive effect of RA (
Xu et al., 2010). Several preceding studies noted that RA enhanced the total expression of Smad3 in activated CD4
+ T cells; however, TGF-β was required to trigger Smad3 activation (i.e. phosphorylation) (
Nolting et al., 2009;
Xiao et al., 2008). Furthermore, TGF-β was observed to prevent the intracellular degradation of RA (
Takeuchi et al., 2011), prompting the possibility that RA and TGF-β cooperatively promote enhanced Smad3 activity. Based on the importance of Smad3 activation in CNS1-mediated Foxp3 expression (
Tone et al., 2008), the role of RA in the regulation of CNS-1 was examined, which led to the identification of a potential RAR binding site (
Xu et al., 2010). Accordingly, RA was shown to dramatically enhance TGF-β induced chromatin accessibility and Smad3 binding in CNS1. The strong association between RA and the regulation of CNS1 not only provides a tentative molecular mechanism for the enhancement of iTreg cell generation, but further suggests that RA synthesis pathways may be manipulated during infection and inflammation to shift the balance between Treg and effector T cells, and in turn influence immunopathology.