PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbacterPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJB ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
J Bacteriol. 2012 August; 194(16): 4461–4462.
PMCID: PMC3416251

Genome Sequences for Six Rhodanobacter Strains, Isolated from Soils and the Terrestrial Subsurface, with Variable Denitrification Capabilities

Abstract

We report the first genome sequences for six strains of Rhodanobacter species isolated from a variety of soil and subsurface environments. Three of these strains are capable of complete denitrification and three others are not. However, all six strains contain most of the genes required for the respiration of nitrate to gaseous nitrogen. The nondenitrifying members of the genus lack only the gene for nitrate reduction, the first step in the full denitrification pathway. The data suggest that the environmental role of bacteria from the genus Rhodanobacter should be reevaluated.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Rhodanobacter contains 11 described species of Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, rod-shaped bacteria belonging to the family Xanthomonadaceae and the class Gammaproteobacteria of the phylum Proteobacteria. Described species have been isolated mainly under aerobic conditions from surficial soils (1, 4, 5, 9, 12, 15, 16). Denitrification has not been considered a property of this genus. Recently, two strains of a new species, Rhodanobacter denitrificans, were isolated from a contaminated terrestrial subsurface environment and shown to denitrify (7, 13). Furthermore, nitrate-reducing isolates were recently recovered from sewage sludge (17), and we and others determined that Rhodanobacter thiooxydans is capable of denitrification (13, 14). In some acidic and nitrate-rich environments, Rhodanobacter species dominate bacterial communities (8, 14).

To explore the genetic basis of phenotypes leading to bacterial community dominance in such environments, genome sequences were acquired for three denitrifying strains (R. denitrificans 2APBS1 and 116-2 and R. thiooxydans) and three strains incapable of denitrification (Rhodanobacter fulvus, Rhodanobacter spathiphylli, and Rhodanobacter sp. 115). A complete R. denitrificans 2APBS1T genome sequence was generated using paired-end Illumina and Roche 454 mate-pair sequencing and manual finishing steps, essentially as described previously (3, 6). Four draft genomes (R. denitrificans 116-2, R. thiooxydans, R. fulvus, and R. spathiphylli) were generated by de novo assembly of paired-end Illumina sequence data (~5.7 to 9.5 million paired-end reads/genome, yielding ~1.1 to 1.9 Gb of total output/genome) (CLC Genomics Workbench 5.0; CLC bio A/S, Denmark). DNA from each strain was prepared for sequencing using the Nextera library preparation kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI). DNA from Rhodanobacter sp. 115 was prepared for sequencing using the Ion Xpress fragment library kit (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) and sequenced using a Personal Genome Machine (Ion Torrent, San Francisco, CA), yielding approximately 1.4 Mb of reads (~138 Mb of total output). For Rhodanobacter sp. 115, genome assembly was performed as described previously (10) using CG-Pipeline modules (11), yielding 453 contigs and 4.2 Mb of genomic sequence data. The complete genome of R. denitrificans 2APBS1 is 4.23 Mb. Annotation was performed in RAST (2) and in the CG-Pipeline before being submitted to NCBI.

Denitrification is a strain-specific trait, and the high sequence divergence observed in genetic markers for denitrification challenges our ability to understand the fundamental ecological principles and environmental parameters controlling nitrate attenuation in terrestrial environments (7). Thus, whole-genome sequencing of closely related denitrifying and nondenitrifying taxa is essential to improve detection of denitrifying bacteria in the environment and to develop hypotheses regarding the distribution and acquisition of denitrification genes. Comparative analysis of the six genomes revealed that all strains contained genes coding for complete or nearly complete denitrification pathways. The three nondenitrifying lineages lacked only genes for nitrate reduction. These organisms may still be capable of denitrification, however. Nitrate to nitrite reduction is a widespread physiological capability in the bacterial domain, and in complex environments, such as soil, nitrite will be available for organisms capable of nitrite reduction to gaseous nitrogen end products. These data indicate that the environmental role of bacteria from the genus Rhodanobacter should be reevaluated.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The Rhodanobacter genome assemblies and their annotations were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers AGIL00000000 (DSM 23569), AJXS00000000 (Rhodanobacter strain 115), AJXT00000000 (DSM 17631), AJXU00000000 (DSM 18449), AJXV00000000 (DSM 24678), and AJXW00000000 (DSM 18863).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy, grant numbers DE-FG02-07ER64373, -97ER62469, and -97ER64398 and by the Oak Ridge Integrated Field-Research Challenge, operated by the Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).

ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy contract no. DE-AC05-00OR22725.

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NLM, NCBI.

The complete genome of Rhodanobacter denitrificans strain 2APBS1 was sequenced by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

We gratefully acknowledge assistance from Tonia Mehlhorn and Kenneth Lowe for sampling and uranium measurements.

REFERENCES

1. An DS, Lee HG, Lee ST, Im WT. 2009. Rhodanobacter ginsenosidimutans sp. nov., isolated from soil of a ginseng field in South Korea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59: 691–694. [PubMed]
2. Aziz RK, et al. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9: 75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Bennett S. 2004. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics 5: 433–438. [PubMed]
4. Bui TP, Kim YJ, Kim H, Yang DC. 2010. Rhodanobacter soli sp. nov., isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60: 2935–2939. [PubMed]
5. De Clercq D, et al. 2006. Rhodanobacter spathiphylli sp. nov., a gammaproteobacterium isolated from the roots of Spathiphyllum plants grown in a compost-amended potting mix. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56: 1755–1759. [PubMed]
6. Elkins JG, et al. 2010. Complete genome sequence of the cellulolytic thermophile Caldicellulosiruptor obsidiansis OB47T. J. Bacteriol. 192: 6099–6100. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Green SJ, et al. 2010. Denitrifying bacteria isolated from terrestrial subsurface sediments exposed to mixed-waste contamination. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76: 3244–3254. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Green SJ, et al. 2012. Denitrifying bacteria from the genus Rhodanobacter dominate bacterial communities in the highly contaminated subsurface of a nuclear legacy waste site. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 1039–1047. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Im WT, Lee ST, Yokota A. 2004. Rhodanobacter fulvus sp. nov., a β-galactosidase-producing gammaproteobacterium. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 50: 143–147. [PubMed]
10. Jordan IK, et al. 2011. Genome sequences for five strains of the emerging pathogen Haemophilus haemolyticus. J. Bacteriol. 193: 5879–5880. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Kislyuk AO, et al. 2010. A computational genomics pipeline for prokaryotic sequencing projects. Bioinformatics 26: 1819–1826. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Nalin R, Simonet P, Vogel TM, Normand P. 1999. Rhodanobacter lindaniclasticus gen. nov., sp. nov., a lindane-degrading bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49: 19–23. [PubMed]
13. Prakash O, et al. 25 November 2011, posting date Description of Rhodanobacter denitrificans sp. nov., isolated from uranium and nitrate contaminated subsurface sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.035840-0.
14. van den Heuvel RN, van der Biezen E, Jetten MSM, Hefting MM, Kartal B. 2010. Denitrification at pH 4 by a soil-derived Rhodanobacter-dominated community. Environ. Microbiol. 12: 3264–3271. [PubMed]
15. Wang L, et al. 2011. Rhodanobacter panaciterrae sp. nov., a bacterium with ginsenoside-converting activity isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61: 3028–3032. [PubMed]
16. Weon HY, et al. 2007. Rhodanobacter ginsengisoli sp. nov. and Rhodanobacter terrae sp. nov., isolated from soil cultivated with Korean ginseng. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57: 2810–2813. [PubMed]
17. Woo SG, Srinivasan S, Kim MK, Lee M. 6 January 2012, posting date. Rhodanobacter caeni sp. nov., a denitrifying bacterium isolated from sludge in a sewage disposal plant. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.033365-0. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)