Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosgenPLoS GeneticsSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)View this Article
PLoS Genet. 2012 August; 8(8): e1002880.
Published online 2012 August 9. doi:  10.1371/journal.pgen.1002880
PMCID: PMC3415444

HAL-2 Promotes Homologous Pairing during Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by Antagonizing Inhibitory Effects of Synaptonemal Complex Precursors

R. Scott Hawley, Editor


During meiosis, chromosomes align with their homologous pairing partners and stabilize this alignment through assembly of the synaptonemal complex (SC). Since the SC assembles cooperatively yet is indifferent to homology, pairing and SC assembly must be tightly coordinated. We identify HAL-2 as a key mediator in this coordination, showing that HAL-2 promotes pairing largely by preventing detrimental effects of SC precursors (SYP proteins). hal-2 mutants fail to establish pairing and lack multiple markers of chromosome movement mediated by pairing centers (PCs), chromosome sites that link chromosomes to cytoplasmic microtubules through nuclear envelope-spanning complexes. Moreover, SYP proteins load inappropriately along individual unpaired chromosomes in hal-2 mutants, and markers of PC-dependent movement and function are restored in hal-2; syp double mutants. These and other data indicate that SYP proteins can impede pairing and that HAL-2 promotes pairing predominantly but not exclusively by counteracting this inhibition, thereby enabling activation and regulation of PC function. HAL-2 concentrates in the germ cell nucleoplasm and colocalizes with SYP proteins in nuclear aggregates when SC assembly is prevented. We propose that HAL-2 functions to shepherd SYP proteins prior to licensing of SC assembly, preventing untimely interactions between SC precursors and chromosomes and allowing sufficient accumulation of precursors for rapid cooperative assembly upon homology verification.

Author Summary

For successful segregation of homologous chromosomes during sexual reproduction, homologs must first identify and pair with their correct partners. Further, many organisms stabilize and maintain alignment between paired homologs through assembly of a highly ordered structure known as the synaptonemal complex (SC). Pairing and synapsis must be tightly coordinated to ensure that SC assembly only occurs in a productive manner, linking the axes of correctly aligned homologous chromosomes. In this work, we identify HAL-2, a protein that concentrates in the nucleoplasm of germ cells, as a key player in mediating this coordination. We find that precursors of the SC have the potential to inhibit homolog pairing, interfering with the very process that the SC normally serves to stabilize. Moreover, we show that HAL-2 promotes homolog pairing and associated chromosome movement primarily by counteracting these detrimental inhibitory effects of SC precursors. Our data suggest that HAL-2 serves to prevent inappropriate association of SC precursors with chromosomes prior to licensing of SC assembly, and we propose that HAL-2 may enable precursors to accumulate in a manner that allows rapid, cooperative SC assembly upon homology verification.


Generation of haploid gametes during sexual reproduction depends critically on the ability of homologous chromosomes to identify and form pairwise associations with their appropriate partners. Pairing is essential to enable homologs to orient and segregate away from each other at the meiosis I division, thereby achieving the reduction in ploidy that is necessary to ensure restoration of the diploid state upon fertilization.

Pairing between homologous chromosomes is reinforced by a highly ordered tripartite structure known as the synaptonemal complex (SC) that assembles at the interface between aligned homologs [1]. The lateral elements (LEs) of the SC are comprised of cohesin complexes and meiosis-specific axial components that coalesce along the length of each homolog during early meiotic prophase. SC central region (CR) proteins, which contain extended coiled-coil domains, then load to create transverse connections between the axes of the paired homologs, conferring the characteristic zipper-like appearance of mature SC. SC proteins collaborate with meiosis-specific recombination proteins to promote crossover recombination events between the homologs and to promote maturation of chromosome structure surrounding crossover sites into temporary connections known as chiasmata that enable homolog segregation at the meiosis I division [2].

Although the SC normally assembles only between paired homologous chromosomes, the SC structure itself is indifferent to homology. Moreover, SC assembly is highly cooperative and processive, such that once synapsis is initiated, it can proceed along nonhomologous chromosome segments [1]. Further, CR proteins have a propensity to self-assemble into aggregates known as polycomplexes even when they are not associated with chromosomes [3][6]. Thus, homolog pairing and synapsis must be tightly coordinated to ensure that SC assembly only occurs in a productive fashion, linking the axes of correctly aligned homologs.

During Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis, much of the coordination between pairing and synapsis is mediated by specialized chromosomal domains termed pairing centers (PCs) that are located near one end of each chromosome [7][9]. PCs function both in conferring SC-independent local stabilization of pairing and in promoting SC assembly [8], [10]. A family of zinc finger proteins (HIM-8, ZIM-1, ZIM-2 and ZIM-3) that bind to specific PCs mediates functional connections between chromosomes and cytoplasmic dynein and microtubules through a conserved nuclear envelope-spanning complex (which includes KASH-domain protein ZYG-12 and SUN-domain protein SUN-1) that promotes dramatic intranuclear chromosome movements [11][17]. In addition to facilitating timely pairing between homologs, these movements also appear to play a role in licensing SC assembly [14]. Dynein-dependent forces acting at PCs have been proposed to function in a checkpoint-like mechanism that makes SC assembly contingent upon homology verification [14], [18]. Both the ZYG-12/SUN-1 complex and the HORMA domain LE component HTP-1 have been implicated in the operation of this proposed coupling mechanism, serving to impose a barrier to SC assembly that can be overcome by interactions between homologous PCs, thereby preventing SC assembly between nonhomologous chromosomes [14], [16], [18]. Further, HTP-1 has also been implicated in a second coordination mechanism that couples termination of chromosome movement with SC installation [18].

Here we identify a nucleoplasmic component of the meiotic machinery, HAL-2 (homolog alignment-2), that provides a distinct contribution to the coordination of homolog pairing and synapsis. We find that HAL-2 promotes pairing between homologous chromosomes predominantly by counteracting detrimental inhibitory effects of CR precursors (SYP proteins). By preventing uncontrolled behavior of SYP proteins that interferes with PC function and antagonizes HTP-1/2 localization, HAL-2 enables chromosome movement and homology assessment. Additionally, we find that HAL-2 also has SYP-independent roles in regulating progression of meiotic prophase events, by contributing to the coupling mechanism that maintains chromosome mobilization in response to unsynapsed chromosomes and by promoting initiation of recombination.


hal-2 mutants are defective in nuclear reorganization and homolog pairing during meiotic prophase

An essential role for HAL-2 in promoting nuclear reorganization and homolog pairing was revealed through analysis of the hal-2(me79) mutant, which was isolated in a screen for mutants with defective meiotic chromosome segregation [19], [20]. Cytological analysis of the hal-2(me79) mutant revealed defects in chromosome organization during meiotic prophase. In wild-type germ cell nuclei entering meiotic prophase (in a region of the gonad called the transition zone, TZ), chromosomes are dramatically reorganized into a clustered configuration that reflects active chromosome movement (Figure 1A) [14], [15], [21], [22]. In the hal-2 mutant, germ cell nuclei entering meiotic prophase lack this characteristic TZ organization and chromosomes are instead dispersed around the nuclear periphery (Figure 1A). Further, whereas wild-type nuclei at the mid-pachytene stage exhibit parallel tracks of DAPI-stained DNA corresponding to aligned homolog pairs, hal-2 mutant nuclei at this stage exhibit disorganized single DAPI tracks (Figure 1B). This organization reflects a severe impairment of homolog pairing in the hal-2 mutant, as assessed at the 5S locus on chromosome V (by fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]) and at the X chromosome PC (X-PC) (by immunofluorescence [IF] for X-PC binding protein HIM-8) (Figure 1C). In both assays, the hal-2 mutant exhibited two widely separated foci in most nuclei (see quantitation below), indicating a failure to achieve homolog pairing.

Figure 1
Defective nuclear reorganization and homologous pairing in hal-2 mutants.

As expected given the pairing defect, diakinesis oocytes in the hal-2 mutant contain 12 univalents, indicating a lack of chiasmata connecting homologous chromosomes (Figure 1B). Absence of chiasmata results in impaired meiotic chromosome segregation, with hal-2 mutant hermaphrodites producing both a high frequency of inviable embryos (87.2%, n = 1147), indicative of autosomal aneuploidy, and a high incidence of males (Him) among the surviving progeny, indicative of X chromosome missegregation (32.7%, n = 147) (Table S1) [23].

hal-2 mutants lack multiple markers of PC-mediated chromosomal movement

Nuclear reorganization and initiation of homologous pairing in the TZs of wild-type worms are accompanied by dramatic chromosomal movements that are mediated by association of PCs and their binding proteins with patches of nuclear envelope (NE) proteins that are in turn connected to cytoplasmic microtubules [14][16]. SUN-1, an inner NE protein, is phosphorylated on multiple residues upon meiotic entry in a CHK-2-dependent fashion, and together with the outer NE protein ZYG-12, is reorganized into NE patches in wild-type TZ nuclei [11], [14][17]. Further, polo-like kinase PLK-2, which promotes phosphorylation of Ser12 (S12-Pi) of SUN-1, colocalizes during early meiotic prophase with PCs, ZYG-12 and phosphorylated SUN-1 in these NE patches and promotes their formation [24], [25]. IF analysis revealed that PLK-2 is not localized to NE patches in early prophase nuclei in hal-2 mutants, and SUN-1 S12-Pi is not detected (Figure 2A). Further, even though ZYG-12::GFP was localized to the nuclear envelope in the hal-2 mutant, it was not reorganized into patches, and CHK-2-dependent phosphorylation of Ser8 (S8-Pi) of SUN-1 was severely reduced and/or delayed (Figures 2B and S1). Finally, while live imaging of TZ nuclei in wild-type control germ lines showed chromosome-associated ZYG-12::GFP patches moving rapidly along the nuclear envelope, no evidence of mobile ZYG-12::GFP NE patches was visible in hal-2 mutant nuclei (Videos S1 and S2). Thus, the modification and reorganization of the NE proteins required for PC-mediated chromosomal movement is severely abrogated in hal-2 mutants.

Figure 2
hal-2 mutants lack multiple markers of PC-mediated chromosomal movement.

We also assessed recruitment of autosomal PC-binding proteins ZIM-2 (chromosome V) and ZIM-3 (chromosomes I and IV) in the hal-2 mutant. Whereas the X-PC binding protein HIM-8 is associated with the X-PCs and the nuclear envelope throughout most of the germ line, association of the ZIM proteins with their respective PCs and the nuclear envelope occurs most prominently in the TZ during wild-type meiosis, beginning just prior to the onset of homolog pairing [12], [13]. We found that while bright NE-associated HIM-8 foci were detected in hal-2 mutant nuclei (Figures 1C and S2), no bright ZIM-2 or ZIM-3 foci were detected (Figures 2C and S3A), indicating a failure to concentrate ZIM-2 and ZIM-3 to their respective PCs and the nuclear envelope. In summary, our data indicate that hal-2 mutants are defective in the assembly of the linkage between PCs and cytoplasmic microtubules (via the NE bridge) required for PC-mediated chromosome movement.

SYP proteins are loaded onto the axes of unpaired homologs in hal-2 mutants

During wild-type meiosis, assembly of the SC between successfully paired homologs is initiated in the TZ. LE components such as HIM-3 and HTP-3 [26], [27] coalesce to form discrete chromosome axes, and these axes are then linked by loading of CR components such as SYP-1 and SYP-3 between them [10], [28], [29]. In standard high-resolution IF images, LE components and SYP proteins colocalize at the interface between aligned homologous chromosomes, beginning in the TZ and during the pachytene stage (Figures 3A and 3B). In meiotic prophase nuclei from similar regions of hal-2 mutant germ lines, we detected HTP-3 and HIM-3 localized in tracks along the individual chromosomes, indicating that LEs assemble along the unpaired chromosomes in the hal-2 mutant. Whereas SYP proteins normally load only between paired LEs, however, we found that SYP proteins colocalized with LE components along the lengths of individual unpaired chromosomes in the hal-2 mutant (Figures 3A and 3B). Colocalization of SYP-1 with HTP-3 in the hal-2 mutant was detected at about the same time or soon after HTP-3 began to coalesce into discrete axial structures (Figure 3A). These data indicate that in the absence of HAL-2, SYP proteins are able to load onto unpaired chromosome axes.

Figure 3
SYP proteins are loaded onto the axes of unpaired homologs in hal-2 mutants.

Images obtained using 3D-structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM) [30] support this interpretation. In 3D-SIM images of wild-type pachytene nuclei, the two LEs of the aligned homologs (visualized using an α-HTP-3 antibody) can be spatially resolved as two separate entities along much of their lengths, with SYP-1 localized between the two LEs and the associated chromatin of the paired homologs (Figure 3C and Video S3). In 3D-SIM images of hal-2 mutant pachytene nuclei, SYP-1 was detected mainly in association with single LEs (rather than between resolvable pairs of LEs) along the lengths of the conjoined sister chromatids of unaligned individual chromosomes (Figure 3C and Video S4). Further, in nuclei where short stretches of parallel LE tracks were observed, these corresponded to regions of fold-back near chromosome ends or regions where LEs of two different chromosomes were in close proximity (Figure S4). Thus, the 3D-SIM images are most consistent with SYP proteins loading along individual LEs in the hal-2 mutant, rather than with formation of SCs between sister chromatid pairs that each had assembled their own LE. Intersister SC formation has been reported to occur in Rec8 null mutant mice [31] and in the budding yeast pds5 meiotic-null mutant [32]; in both cases, the widths of the intersister SCs in the mutants were similar to those of interhomolog SCs in wild-type controls [31], [32]. While the lack of extensive resolvable pairs of LEs in our 3D-SIM images of hal-2 mutant nuclei rules out the formation of intersister SCs of normal width, however, we cannot exclude the possibility that intersister SC-like structures of smaller width might form in hal-2 mutants.

The loading of SYP proteins onto the axes of unaligned individual chromosomes in hal-2 mutants contrasts with a distinct class of C. elegans pairing mutants (including htp-1) in which chromosomes engage in extensive nonhomologous synapsis, with SYP proteins linking the axes of nonhomologous chromosomes [16], [18], [26], [33]. This aspect of the hal-2 phenotype also contrasts with chk-2 mutants, in which pairing is abolished and SYP loading is very delayed [18], [20]. We found that hal-2; htp-1 double mutants load HTP-3 and SYP-1 extensively onto unpaired chromosome axes (as in the hal-2 single mutant; Figure S5), indicating that nonhomologous synapsis in the htp-1 mutant is dependent on HAL-2 and suggesting that HAL-2 may be required for SYP proteins to connect chromosome axes together. Likewise, the hal-2; chk-2 double mutant also resembles the hal-2 single mutant with respect to loading of HTP-3 and SYP-1 (Figure S5), implying that the ability to inhibit SYP loading on unpaired axes requires HAL-2.

Removal of SYP proteins in hal-2 mutants partially restores chromosome clustering, markers of PC-mediated chromosome movement, and homologous pairing

The inappropriate loading of SYP proteins onto unpaired homologs in hal-2 mutants raised the possibility that the defects related to homologous pairing might be a consequence of the improper association of SYP proteins with chromosomes. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated several features associated with homologous pairing in hal-2 mutants lacking the SYP proteins. First, we found that removal of SYP proteins (in hal-2; syp double mutants) substantially restored multiple features associated with PC-mediated chromosome movement that were eliminated in hal-2 single mutants. Nuclei with clustered chromosomes and NE patches of PLK-2, ZYG-12::GFP and phosphorylated SUN-1 (S12-Pi and S8-Pi) were detected in hal-2; syp-2 and/or syp-3; hal-2 double mutants (Figures 4A, S3B and S6). Further, live imaging of ZYG-12::GFP in hal-2; syp-2 germ lines indicated that these restored NE patches are competent for movement (Video S5). After the TZ region, hal-2; syp-2 nuclei also resembled wild-type nuclei in that most nuclei retained a single bright NE focus that was closely associated with HIM-8, indicating that the ZYG-12/SUN-1 NE patch attached to the X chromosomes persists longer than those associated with the autosomes (Figure S7) [14], [15]. In addition, localization of the autosomal PC-binding proteins ZIM-2 and ZIM-3 to bright foci at the nuclear periphery in nuclei with clustered chromosomes was also observed in hal-2; syp-2 double mutants (Figures 4B and S3A). Finally, restoration of chromosome clustering and SUN-1 S8-Pi in the syp-3; hal-2 mutants is dependent on CHK-2, as these features were absent in syp-3; hal-2; chk-2 triple mutants (Figure S6). Taken together, these findings indicate that CHK-2-/PLK-2-dependent PC-mediated chromosome mobilization can be inhibited by SYP proteins, and that HAL-2 antagonizes this inhibitory effect of SYP proteins on PC function.

Figure 4
Removal of SYP proteins in hal-2 mutants partially restores chromosome clustering, markers of PC-mediated chromosome movement, and homologous pairing.

Second, we found evidence that significant homolog pairing occurred in hal-2 mutants that lacked the SYP proteins. The syp mutants are proficient for establishment of pairing at PCs and can achieve a significant degree of lengthwise homolog alignment, but are defective in stabilization and maintenance of homologous associations [10], [28], [34][36]; this made it possible to test whether significant homolog pairing occurred in hal-2; syp double mutants. We quantified levels of pairing at the X chromosome PCs (using IF for HIM-8), at chromosome V PCs (V-PCs) (using IF for ZIM-2) and at an internal position of chromosome V (using FISH for the 5S rDNA locus) (Figures 4D–F). For all of these analyses, gonads were divided into 5 zones of equal lengths, as indicated in Figure 4C.

Pairing at the X-PC was quantified from Zones 2–5 (Figure 4D), as HIM-8 localization at the X-PCs is most robust from the TZ through late pachytene [13]. Whereas pairing at the X-PCs was effectively abolished in the hal-2 single mutant, high levels of pairing were restored in the hal-2; syp-2 double mutant, with X-PC pairing levels peaking in Zones 3 and 4 at levels approaching those of syp-2 and wild-type controls (Figure 4D). Although X-PC pairing was substantially restored in the hal-2; syp-2 double mutant, however, pairing in all zones was significantly lower than in the syp-2 single mutant, suggesting that restoration of synapsis–independent maintenance of PC pairing may be incomplete.

ZIM-2 pairing levels were analyzed specifically for Zone 2, the zone where ZIM-2 foci are most prominently detected during normal meiosis (Figure 4E). In wild-type gonads, Zone 2 includes some premeiotic nuclei, the TZ, and some early pachytene nuclei; hence, the wild-type data set included nuclei with two bright ZIM-2 foci, nuclei with a single focus (indicative of paired PCs), and some nuclei without ZIM-2 foci. As described above, hal-2 mutants lack nuclei with clear bright ZIM-2 foci, and these foci are restored in the hal-2; syp-2 double mutants (Figure 4B). Among the nuclei with ZIM-2 foci in Zone 2, the proportion of nuclei in which foci were paired in the hal-2; syp-2 double mutant was similar to the proportions observed for both wild-type and syp-2 mutant gonads (Figure 4E), indicating highly successful pairing at the V-PCs in early meiotic prophase nuclei with ZIM-2 foci in the hal-2; syp-2 double mutants. Whereas ZIM-2 foci (and other markers of PC-mediated movement) persisted into Zones 3 and 4 in syp-2 mutant gonads, ZIM-2 foci were not detected beyond Zone 2 in the hal-2; syp-2 double mutants (data not shown), thus precluding assessment of pairing at V-PCs throughout a larger portion of the hal-2; syp-2 mutant germ lines.

Pairing at the 5S locus on chromosome V was assessed for all five zones of the gonad (Figure 4F). While pairing at this locus was abolished throughout the gonad in the hal-2 single mutant, the syp-3; hal-2 double mutant exhibited a highly significant increase in pairing over the hal-2 single mutant specifically in Zone 2 (p<0.0001), the same zone in which chromosome V PCs were shown to be active in the hal-2; syp-2 double mutant. However, increases in pairing were not detected in other zones and pairing levels for syp-3; hal-2 for Zones 2–5 were consistently significantly lower than in syp-3 controls. As markers of active PCs persist beyond Zone 2 at the X-PCs but not at the autosomal PCs (in both hal-2; syp-2 and wild-type), it is likely that the lower level of pairing restoration observed for chromosome V upon removal of SYP proteins reflects a difference between the X chromosome and autosomes in the duration of PC activity.

Taken together, our analyses show that significant homologous pairing at the PCs can occur in hal-2 mutants when SYP proteins are absent, indicating that the SYP proteins can interfere with pairing, likely through inappropriate association with unaligned chromosomes. These findings imply that HAL-2 promotes PC function by counteracting inhibitory effects of the SYP proteins. However, incomplete restoration of pairing also indicates that HAL-2 plays additional role(s) in homolog alignment beyond antagonizing inhibitory effects of SYP proteins on PC function (see below).

hal-2 mutants exhibit reduced chromosomal localization of HTP-1/2 that is rescued by removal of SYP proteins

hal-2 mutants show several phenotypic similarities with worms lacking both HTP-1 and HTP-2 (LE components that are paralogs of HIM-3 and HTP-3), including association of SYP proteins with the axes of unpaired chromosomes in pachytene nuclei [33], [37]. Thus, we assessed localization of HTP-1/2 in hal-2 mutant gonads by IF. (Since HTP-1 and HTP-2 are recognized by the same antibody, they are referred to as HTP-1/2 [37].) In wild-type germ lines, HTP-1/2 colocalize with other SC components (including the SYP proteins) along the full lengths of paired homologs until late pachytene, when HTP-1/2 and SYP proteins begin to become redistributed in a crossover-dependent fashion to reciprocal chromosomal domains such that their localization is almost mutually exclusive by diakinesis, with HTP-1/2 localizing on the long arms of the bivalent and SYP proteins localizing on the short arms (Figure 5) [37], [38]. The localization of HTP-1/2 on diakinesis chromosomes is markedly different from the other axis components, such as HTP-3, which localize to all four arms of the bivalent (Figure 5B) [27], [37].

Figure 5
hal-2 mutants exhibit reduced chromosomal localization of HTP-1/2 that is rescued by removal of SYP proteins.

We found that HTP-1/2 localization was impaired in the hal-2 mutant. During the pachytene stage, faint HTP-1/2 staining was detected along the axes of the unpaired chromosomes, but the level of HTP-1/2 relative to HTP-3 was much lower than in wild-type controls (Figure 5A). Further, while HTP-3 was present on univalent chromosomes of diakinesis-stage oocytes in the hal-2 mutant, HTP-1/2 staining was undetectable (Figure 5B).

The fact that SYP proteins load improperly onto unaligned chromosome axes in hal-2 mutants raised the possibility that the SYP proteins might be preventing the normal localization of HTP-1/2. Consistent with this hypothesis, HTP-1/2 localization was substantially restored in hal-2; syp-2 double mutant gonads, both at the pachytene and diakinesis stages (Figure 5). These results provide additional support for a previously proposed idea that SYP proteins and HTP-1/2 are incompatible, each antagonizing the chromosomal localization of the other [37]. Further, the data suggest that HAL-2 plays a role in promoting a temporary compatibility between SYP proteins and HTP-1/2 that enables them to coexist along the lengths of chromosomes from zygotene through mid-pachytene stages during wild-type meiosis.

hal-2 encodes a protein that concentrates in the nucleoplasm of germ cells

Mapping of the hal-2(me79) mutation, phenocopy by RNAi, and identification of a nonsense mutation in the me79 allele by sequence analysis identified T16H12.11 as the hal-2 gene (see Materials and Methods) (Figure 6A). An independently generated deletion allele, tm4960, is missing 596 bp of the 927-bp coding region (Figure 6A) and fails to complement me79, confirming the molecular identity of hal-2 as T16H12.11. The two alleles cause similar phenotypic defects and both are likely null alleles; all of the analyses reported here were performed using the me79 mutant unless otherwise specified. Although the T16H12.11 gene model in WormBase (release WS227) predicts a 295 aa protein, we propose a modified gene model (that uses an upstream ATG) based on upstream conservation of amino acid sequence in other Caenorhabditis orthologs (Figure S8). The revised gene model encodes a predicted 308 aa protein with MW of 36.1 kDa. An antibody raised against the C-terminal 100 amino acids of HAL-2 detects a band of slightly less than 37 kDa in Western blot analysis of wild-type whole worm lysates, consistent with the protein size predicted by our revised gene model. This band was absent in lysates from both hal-2(me79) and hal-2(tm4960) mutant worms (Figure 6B), indicating that no full-length protein is produced in these mutants.

Figure 6
hal-2 encodes a protein that concentrates in the nucleoplasm of germ cells.

Bioinformatics analyses using PSI-BLAST and several protein structure prediction servers yielded little information regarding HAL-2 function. No homologs were detected outside of the Caenorhabditis genus, and no conserved motifs were detected by searches of the Conserved Domain Database. Further, while HAL-2 orthologs were found in other Caenorhabditis species, they exhibited relatively low sequence conservation (52% amino acid identity between ortholog pairs). This differs from conservation levels observed within Caenorhabditis for proteins implicated directly in meiotic recombination (which range from 74–98% amino acid identity) and is more in line with conservation levels for SYP proteins ortholog pairs (which range from 41–61% amino acid identity). Analysis using the COILS and Paircoil2 programs [39], [40] suggests that a short domain (33–46 amino acids) in HAL-2 orthologs may have the capacity to adopt a coiled-coil conformation, although the probability of this conformation differed widely among HAL-2 orthologs and reached significance threshold only for a subset of them.

IF analysis using our α-HAL-2 antibody demonstrated that the HAL-2 protein concentrates in the nuclei of germ cells. HAL-2 staining was first detected in germ cell nuclei before they entered the TZ and gradually weakened during diplotene until no signal was observed by the end of diakinesis (Figures 6C–E). As the majority of the IF signal did not colocalize with DAPI-stained chromatin, nucleoli (data not shown) or SC (see below), we infer that HAL-2 is predominantly nucleoplasmic. This nucleoplasmic staining was detected in wild-type gonads but was absent in hal-2 mutant gonads (Figure 6E), further verifying the specificity of the antibody. We also generated a functional GFP::HAL-2 transgene that rescues the Him and progeny lethality phenotypes of hal-2 mutants (Table S1). GFP::HAL-2 expressed from this transgene exhibited a similar nucleoplasmic localization in germ cells, although the protein persisted beyond diplotene (Figure 6F and data not shown), likely because of heterologous promoter and 3′UTR sequences.

HAL-2 colocalizes with SYP proteins in aggregates that form when SC assembly is prevented

Since our phenotypic analyses indicated that HAL-2 plays an important role in restraining the behavior of the SYP proteins, we used IF to investigate their spatial relationship in situ. In wild-type germ cell nuclei, little or no overlap was detected between the localization of HAL-2, which concentrates in the nucleoplasm, and SYP-1, which concentrates at the interface between aligned chromosomes (Figure 7).

Figure 7
HAL-2 colocalizes with SYP proteins in aggregates that form when SC assembly is prevented.

However, when we analyzed the localization of HAL-2 in the scc-3 cohesin mutant, in which chromosome axes and SC assembly are severely disrupted and LE precursors (including the other cohesin subunits) and SYP proteins form aggregates (presumably polycomplexes) in the nuclei instead of loading extensively onto chromosomes, we detected HAL-2 both in the nucleoplasm and concentrated together with SYP-1 in the nuclear aggregates (Figure 7) [27], [41]. Localization of HAL-2 in nuclear aggregates is dependent on SYP-1, as HAL-2 nuclear aggregates are not observed in scc-3; syp-1 germ cell nuclei (Figure 7). Further, we found that HAL-2 colocalized with SYP-1 in nuclear aggregates in an htp-3 mutant, in which LEs do not assemble along the chromosomes but cohesin components are also not present in the nuclear aggregates (Figure 7) [42]. Finally, we examined HAL-2 localization in a him-3 null mutant, which does assemble LEs that contain cohesin complexes, HTP-1/2 and HTP-3, but is severely defective for SC assembly [26], [27], [37], [42]. In the him-3 mutant, SYP-1 appears as small nuclear aggregates at early pachytene that elongate into short stretches by late pachytene, and HAL-2 was found both in the nucleoplasm and colocalized together with SYP-1 in these structures (Figure 7). HAL-2 is not required for formation of these SYP-1 nuclear aggregates, however, as SYP-1 aggregates were still formed in hal-2; him-3 double mutants (Figure S9). Together, these analyses of SYP-dependent localization of HAL-2 to nuclear aggregates in various mutants with defective LE and SC assembly raise the possibility that HAL-2 might interact with SYP proteins or other SC-associated proteins; however these IF analyses do not address whether such potential interactions are direct or indirect.

HAL-2 has additional roles in meiosis beyond preventing inappropriate association of SYP proteins with chromosomes

Consistent with our finding that homolog pairing in the hal-2; syp double mutants is not restored to the levels observed in syp single mutants, closer examination of DAPI-stained chromosome morphology, SUN-1 phosphorylation, ZYG-12::GFP patches and PLK-2 localization in hal-2; syp-2 gonads provided further evidence that HAL-2 has additional roles in meiosis beyond regulating SYP loading (Figures 8A, S10 and data not shown). In contrast to the dramatically extended TZ observed in syp-2 mutant gonads, in which nuclei with clustered chromosomes and multiple bright NE patches reflecting ongoing chromosome mobilization persist until near the very end of the pachytene region (Figure 8A) [14], [15], [21], [34], hal-2; syp-2 mutant gonads lack persistent chromosome clustering, and only the single NE focus associated with HIM-8 persists beyond the TZ, as in wild-type gonads (Figures 8A and S7). The fact that hal-2; syp-2 nuclei can exit from the clustered chromosome organization despite lack of synapsis suggests that HAL-2 may be required for normal functioning of a checkpoint-like mechanism that operates to make redispersal of clustered chromosomes contingent upon SC assembly [18].

Figure 8
HAL-2 has additional roles in meiosis beyond preventing inappropriate association of SYP proteins with chromosomes.

We also found that hal-2 mutants exhibit severely reduced levels of immunostaining for DNA strand exchange protein RAD-51 [34], [43]. Whereas multiple RAD-51 foci were detected in most early/mid-pachytene nuclei in wild-type germ lines, most nuclei in hal-2 mutant germ lines lacked RAD-51 foci (Figure 8B), suggesting that initiation of recombination may be impaired. Further, this deficit of RAD-51 foci was not suppressed in the syp-3; hal-2 double mutant, which also lacked RAD-51 foci in most nuclei, indicating that this phenotype is not a secondary consequence of inappropriate SYP loading. The reduced levels of RAD-51 foci in the syp-3; hal-2 double mutant contrasts with the increased levels of foci observed in the syp-3 single mutant (Figure 8B) [44], indicating that absence of HAL-2 prevents accumulation of RAD-51 foci. Reduction in RAD-51 foci in hal-2 mutants suggests either that hal-2 mutants have a reduced number of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) or that HAL-2 is needed for efficient loading of RAD-51 onto DSBs. To test whether HAL-2 is required for accumulation of RAD-51 on DSBs, we induced DSBs with ionizing irradiation in hal-2 animals and dissected them 1 hour post irradiation for RAD-51 immunostaining. Abundant RAD-51 foci were detected in nuclei throughout the irradiated hal-2 mutant germ lines (Figure 8C), indicating that HAL-2 is not required for accumulation of RAD-51 on DSBs. Taken together, these data suggest that HAL-2 has a role in promoting initiation of recombination that is distinct from its role in regulating SYP loading.

Variable defects in PC-mediated chromosome clustering in combination with impaired DSB formation had been reported previously for the C. elegans him-19 [45] mutant. Moreover, some of the defects in PC function in him-19 mutants were rescued by the introduction of DSBs by irradiation [45], raising the possibility that defects in PC function in hal-2 mutants might be similarly rescued by artificial induction of DSBs. We tested this by inducing DSBs in hal-2 mutants by ionizing irradiation and dissecting the animals 2 hours post irradiation for IF analysis. No chromosome clustering, recruitment of bright ZIM-3 foci to the PCs and nuclear envelope, or NE patches of phosphorylated SUN-1 S12-Pi were observed in the irradiated hal-2 gonads (Figure S11), indicating that these defects in the hal-2 mutant are not secondary consequences of its defect in recombination initiation.


Inhibitory potential of SYP proteins on homologous pairing

The work reported here highlights the potential of SC central region (CR) precursors to exert detrimental effects that interfere with the process of homolog pairing. This potential emphasizes the need for SC precursors to be carefully shepherded during early meiotic prophase to avoid antagonizing the very process that they normally serve to stabilize. One way that CR precursors can cause trouble is by inappropriately linking the axes of nonhomologous chromosomes. If transient nonhomologous interactions that occur during early prophase are stabilized by synapsis, chromosomes will then have fewer chances to associate and pair with their correct partners. This is illustrated by the improved pairing observed when SYP proteins (and nonhomologous synapsis) were eliminated in a mutant with impaired SUN-1 function [16]. Nonhomologous synapsis may also prevent and/or restrain the active prophase chromosomal movements that promote pairing, as illustrated by the amelioration of restrained SUN-1::GFP NE patch movement in an htp-1 mutant by the removal of SYP proteins [21]. Our comparative analyses of hal-2; syp double mutants with hal-2 single mutants have revealed several additional ways in which CR precursors can be detrimental.

Firstly, SYP proteins can interfere with pairing by inhibiting CHK-2-dependent PC activities at the onset of meiotic prophase. In hal-2 mutants, NE protein SUN-1 is not phosphorylated on Ser12 (and S8-Pi is severely reduced and/or delayed), PCs fail to recruit PLK-2, autosomal PC-binding proteins fail to concentrate at their respective PCs or the NE, and no ZYG-12::GFP NE patches or PC-mediated chromosome movements are observed. Coordinate loss of these features suggests that lack of pairing in hal-2 mutants likely results primarily from the abrogation of vital CHK-2-dependent PC functions. Moreover, the fact that all of these problems are alleviated by removal of SYP proteins implies that the unconstrained behavior of SYP proteins in the absence of HAL-2 is responsible for preventing PC function in this context.

Secondly, SYP proteins can interfere with proper chromosomal association of HORMA domain proteins HTP-1/2. An incompatibility between CR proteins and (some) meiosis-specific HORMA domain proteins is evident from observations of apparently opposing spatial relationships of these classes of proteins along chromosomes in several different organisms. In S. cerevisiae, HORMA protein Hop1 and CR protein Zip1 exhibit largely complementary patterns of high and low abundance along pachytene chromosomes [46]. Further, mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 lose their chromosomal localization upon installation of CR protein SYCP1 [47]. In C. elegans, all four HORMA proteins (HTP-3, HIM-3 and HTP-1/2) coexist with the SYP proteins along the lengths of chromosomes for most of the pachytene stage, but at late pachytene HTP-1/2 and SYP proteins are triggered by (nascent) COs to relocalize to reciprocal chromosomal domains [27], [37], [38]. These patterns all suggest a mutually antagonistic relationship between CR proteins and (some) HORMA proteins. In C. elegans, the coexistence of HTP-1/2 and SYP proteins from zygotene until late pachytene further implies a mechanism that temporarily counteracts this antagonism. The temporary compatibility between these proteins during early prophase requires HAL-2, as our data show that the unconstrained behavior of SYP proteins in hal-2 mutants inhibits axis association of HTP-1/2 during early prophase. Since HTP-1/2 is essential for homolog pairing [18], [33], reduced chromosomal HTP-1/2 likely contributes to the pairing defect in hal-2 mutants.

Regulatory role(s) of HAL-2 in controlling behavior of CR precursors in early prophase

Taken together, our data indicate that HAL-2 plays a major role in homolog pairing by restricting the detrimental behavior of SYP proteins and constraining their loading to the appropriate context. Moreover, the contributions of HAL-2 to the coordination of pairing and synapsis are distinct from and parallel to the contribution of a previously identified checkpoint-like mechanism that ensures that SC central region assembly is contingent upon successful homology verification [14], [18]. LE component HTP-1, NE protein SUN-1, and dynein-mediated chromosome movements were shown to be involved in this mechanism [14], [16], [18]. Inhibition of dynein causes a significant delay between pairing and SYP loading (implying that motion and/or exertion of tension is required to license SYP loading), while HTP-1 loss or impaired SUN-1 function bypasses the dynein requirement and leads to nonhomologous synapsis (suggesting that these proteins are required to generate or respond to a “wait synapsis” signal). In contrast, neither pairing nor nonhomologous synapsis occurs in hal-2 mutants, and instead, SYP proteins load along the axes of individual unpaired chromosomes. This suggests the possibility that HAL-2 might function in promoting maturation of CR precursors, such that upon licensing of SC assembly, SYP installation invariably occurs in a manner that links LEs together. Thus, HAL-2 may have two potentially inter-related roles in regulating the behavior of SYP proteins: i) shepherding/restraining CR subunits to prevent them from wreaking havoc in the nucleus and ii) enabling their timely maturation into a form that can be assembled cooperatively into mature SCs.

These proposed roles suggest that HAL-2 might serve in the capacity of a chaperone to help ensure timely and appropriate SC assembly. Although the HAL-2 sequence does not identify it as a member of previously known chaperone families, there are numerous striking parallels between HAL-2 and Fpr3, a prolyl isomerase that regulates SC assembly during budding yeast meiosis [48]. Like HAL-2, Fpr3 localizes in the nucleoplasm of meiotic cells and colocalizes with CR precursors in polycomplexes that form when SC assembly is prevented [48]. Further, like HAL-2, Fpr3 functions in parallel with other mechanisms to prevent assembly of CR precursors onto chromosomes until licensing conditions have been met [48]. Thus, both HAL-2 and Fpr3 can be seen as guardians of CR precursors, inhibiting their inappropriate behavior.

The cooperative and processive nature of SC assembly and the inherent tendency for self-assembly of its precursors [1] present a challenge for meiotic cells: they must accumulate large pools of precursors needed to accomplish rapid SC assembly, while at the same time preventing these precursors from aggregating into nonfunctional structures and/or interfering with prerequisite events. In C. elegans, the SC central region consists of four interdependent coiled-coil SYP proteins that interact to span the distance between the LEs [10], [28], [29], [34], [35]. Thus, involvement of regulatory proteins not included in the mature SC (such as HAL-2) represents a practical solution for controlling maturation of these CR precursors and constraining their loading to occur only in the appropriate context.

In addition to HAL-2, assembly of the SC central region also requires CRA-1 [49], the C. elegans ortholog of the non-catalytic subunit of the NatB N-terminal acetyltransferase complex, which acetylates the N-terminal methionine of proteins containing Met-Asp-, Met-Glu- or Met-Asn- [50], [51]. As in hal-2 mutants, SYP proteins associate with unpaired LEs in cra-1 mutants [49], raising the possibility that maturation of SC precursors may require N-terminal acetylation of one or more subunits. While we have also suggested a role for HAL-2 in promoting CR subunits maturation, it is clear that HAL-2 and CRA-1 make different contributions to regulating SYP behavior. Loading of SYP proteins onto chromosome axes in cra-1 mutants occurs later than in hal-2 mutants and does not interfere with homolog pairing [49]. Further, whereas association of SYP proteins with unpaired chromosomes in cra-1 mutants is dependent on DSB formation and progression of meiotic DSB repair processes [49], SYP proteins load onto unpaired chromosomes in hal-2 mutants in the absence of DSBs (as in hal-2; spo-11 double mutants; Figure S5), indicating that the chromosomal association of SYP proteins in hal-2 mutants is not dependent on DSBs or recombination intermediates.

Potential role of HAL-2 in coupling chromosome redispersal with SC assembly

In addition to the checkpoint-like mechanism that couples SC assembly to homology verification, a related but distinct mechanism operates during C. elegans meiosis to render redispersal of clustered chromosomes and termination of active chromosome motion contingent upon SC assembly [18], [28]. HAL-2 may also play a role in this coupling mechanism that is distinct from its role in preventing SYP proteins from interfering with pairing. This is suggested by the fact that chromosome clustering and PC-mediated chromosome mobilization do not persist in hal-2; syp double mutants, in which synapsis cannot occur. It has been postulated that chromosome redispersal is regulated by a signaling mechanism that monitors synapsis progression, and HTP-1 has been suggested to be involved in generating and/or responding to an inhibitory “wait dispersal” signal that maintains chromosome clustering [18]. Since HTP-1/2 loading onto chromosomes is largely restored by removal of SYP proteins (in hal-2; syp double mutants), the inability to maintain chromosome clustering is not a consequence of lack of HTP-1 in the hal-2 mutant, but it may reflect a cooperation of HAL-2 with HTP-1 in regulating or responding to the “wait dispersal” inhibitory signal.

Implicit in such a coupling mechanism is that progression of synapsis must generate “start dispersal” activation signals to counteract the existing inhibitory signals. The SYP proteins themselves likely contribute, as suggested by analysis of the syp-3(me42) mutant, which expresses C-terminally truncated SYP-3 [28]. In contrast to the persistent chromosome clustering observed in syp null mutants, a premature exit from chromosome clustering is observed in the syp-3(me42) mutant; it was proposed that association of SYP proteins with unpaired chromosomes in this mutant may act as the trigger for chromosome redispersal, as removal of other SYP proteins in the syp-3(me42) mutant restored persistent chromosome clustering [28]. This contrasts with the hal-2 mutant, in which elimination of SYP proteins did not lead to persistent clustering, further supporting the notion that HAL-2 may play a SYP-independent role in the coupling mechanism and/or the maintenance of chromosome movement.

Materials and Methods


C. elegans strains were cultivated at 20°C under standard conditions [52], unless otherwise specified. For experiments involving meiotic mutants, homozygous mutants were picked from the progeny of heterozygous balanced parents by the absence of dominant markers associated with the balancers and/or by the presence of a recessive marker cis-linked with the mutant allele. For Figure S5, the spo-11 single mutant controls imaged were heterozygous for the hal-2 mutation as they were siblings of hal-2; spo-11 double mutants, both of which were derived from doubly balanced heterozygous parents. All experiments involving transgenic strains were performed in the presence of the wild-type gene unless otherwise noted. A list of strains used in this study is provided in Text S1.

hal-2(me79) was generated by EMS mutagenesis and isolated by screening for “Green eggs and Him” [19] and defects in prophase chromosome morphology and organization [20]. hal-2(me79) was mapped to a ~126 kb region between positions 10057573 and 10183653 on chromosome III using standard crosses and SNP mapping [53]. The interval contained 28 known or predicted genes; complementation tests and RNAi led to the identification of T16H12.11 as the likely hal-2 gene. RNAi targeted to the conserved region of T16H12.11 produced a partial hal-2 phenocopy: no apparent TZ, unaligned chromosomes at pachytene and 8–10 DAPI-stained bodies at diakinesis. Sequencing of T16H12.11 in the hal-2(me79) mutant revealed a C-to-T transition resulting in a premature stop (instead of glutamine) encoded at codon 96 of the 308 amino acid coding sequence.

hal-2(tm4960) was provided by Dr. S. Mitani at the C. elegans National BioResource Project, NIG, Japan; the 761 bp deletion was confirmed by PCR and sequencing.

Cytological analysis


Except for Figures 3C, S4, Video S3 and S4, immunostaining, DAPI-staining, image acquisition and processing using the DeltaVision deconvolution microscopy system were performed as in [18], except that slides were washed thrice in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (PBST) before blocking in 0.7% BSA. Dissections were performed on 20–24 hours post-L4 adults. A list of antibodies used is provided in Text S1. For experiments involving transgenic strains carrying GFP::SYP-3, GFP::HAL-2 or ZYG-12::GFP, L4 worms were placed at 25°C for 20–24 hrs before dissection.

For Figures 3C, S4, Video S3 and S4, gonads were dissected at 18 hours post L4 and fixed and processed for immunofluorescence as in [8]. Samples were stained with DAPI and mounted in glycerol containing 1% n-propyl gallate. Glass coverslips measured to 170±5 µm were placed over the samples and sealed with nail polish. 3D-SIM [30] was performed using a DeltaVision OMX microscope (Applied Precision), using an Olympus 1.4NA 100× UPlanSApo objective, with immersion oil (Cargille LaserLiquid) of refractive index 1.513, at 23–24°C. Image stacks of 8 µm thickness, 0.125 µm step size were acquired and processed to reconstruct high-resolution information. The videos each show a rotating series of 3D projections from a 3D-SIM data stack and were made with the IVE software package [54].


5S rDNA probes were amplified as in [36], [55] and labeled with Alexa Fluor 594 using the ULYSIS DNA labeling kit (Invitrogen). FISH was performed similarly to that in [20] with modifications described in Text S1.

Details of image acquisition and quantitative analysis of pairing are provided in Text S1.

Live imaging

L4 animals were selected and placed at 25°C for 20 hours before dissection. Worms were dissected in 10 µl of M9 containing tricaine (0.1%), tetramisole (0.01%) and Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen; 1[ratio]1000) on a coverslip. The coverslip with the dissected worms was flipped onto a 2% agarose pad and imaged immediately using the DeltaVision deconvolution microscopy system with a 60× oil objective with 1.5× optivar. Images were acquired as stacks of 3 optical sections at 1.95 µm intervals every 15 s over a 5 min time period. Exposure times were kept constant for all images. Videos show maximum intensity projections of the 3D stacks displayed at 2 frames/s and were made with the Volocity (PerkinElmer) software.

Irradiation experiments

For RAD-51 immunostaining, 20 hours post-L4 adults were exposed to 1 krad of γ irradiation from a Cs-137 source and dissected and fixed one hour post irradiation (21 hours post-L4). For ZIM-3 and SUN-1 S12-Pi immunostaining, 20 hours post-L4 adults were exposed to 5 krad of γ irradiation and dissected two hours post irradiation (22 hours post-L4). Unirradiated age-matched adults were dissected for immunostaining as controls for all irradiation experiments.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

SUN-1 S8-Pi is severely reduced and/or delayed in hal-2 mutants. Immunolocalization of SUN-1 S8-Pi in DAPI-stained gonads of the indicated genotypes, with meiosis progressing from left to right. In the meiotic prophase region of the wild-type germ line, SUN-1 S8-Pi immunostaining is most robust from the TZ to mid-pachytene stage and concentrates as bright NE patches and also localizes weakly throughout the NE (as shown in zoomed-in image). In contrast, no SUN-1 S8-Pi is detected in the corresponding region of the chk-2 mutant germ line. Two representative examples of hal-2 mutant germ lines are shown; SUN-1 S8-Pi is not detected in the regions corresponding to the transition zone of wild-type germ lines, and exhibits only diffuse NE localization (as shown in zoomed-in images) in a subset of nuclei in the early and mid-pachytene regions. Bar, 50 µm. Bar in zoomed-in images, 10 µm.


Figure S2

HIM-8 localizes close to the nuclear envelope in a hal-2 mutant. IF images of hal-2 early prophase nuclei co-stained with antibodies against HIM-8 and nuclear lamin LMN-1, which localizes immediately adjacent to the inner surface of the NE. Images shown are 3D projections of partial data stacks in which sections from the tops and bottoms of the nuclei were omitted in order to illustrate the close proximity of the HIM-8 foci to the NE; not all HIM-8 foci were contained within the projections shown. Bar, 2 µm.


Figure S3

Bright ZIM-3 foci and NE patches of ZYG-12::GFP and SUN-1 S8-Pi are restored in hal-2; syp-2 double mutants. (A) IF images of early prophase nuclei stained with antibodies against ZIM-3, the PC-binding protein specific for chromosomes I and IV. Bright ZIM-3 foci are detected near the NE of wild-type TZ nuclei (top panel), whereas the hal-2 mutant nuclei lack clear ZIM-3 foci (middle panel). ZIM-3 foci are present in TZ nuclei of the hal-2; syp-2 double mutant (bottom panel), indicating that the concentration of autosomal PC-binding proteins to bright NE-associated foci was restored. Bar, 5 µm. Animals used for these IF images contained the zyg-12::gfp transgene. (B) IF images of early prophase nuclei stained for ZYG-12::GFP and SUN-1 S8-Pi in hal-2 and hal-2; syp-2 germ lines. Chromosome clustering, SUN-1 Ser8 phosphorylation and NE patches containing ZYG-12::GFP and SUN-1 S8-Pi (features that are missing in the hal-2 nuclei) are restored in the hal-2; syp-2 nuclei. Bar, 2 µm. Animals used for these IF images contained the zyg-12::gfp transgene.


Figure S4

Regions of fold-back near chromosome ends observed in hal-2 mutants. 3D-SIM images of a hal-2 mutant pachytene nucleus stained for the LE component HTP-3 and CR protein SYP-1. A short stretch of parallel LEs flanking a single track of SYP-1 (as shown by right panel of zoomed-in images of region in white box) is detected in the hal-2 mutant nucleus and corresponds to a region of fold-back near the end of the chromosome. Images shown are 3D projections of partial data stacks in which the bottom half of the nucleus was excluded in order to highlight the region of fold-back. Bars, 1 µm.


Figure S5

SYP-1 localization in hal-2; chk-2 , hal-2; htp-1 and hal-2; spo-11 double mutants resembles that in hal-2 mutants. IF images of HTP-3 and SYP-1 in late pachytene nuclei of the indicated genotypes. Images show: 1) many asynapsed chromosomes (HTP-3 stretches lacking SYP-1) and limited SYP-1 localized at the interface between nonhomologous chromosome segments in the chk-2 mutant; 2) extensive synapsis (between paired X chromosomes and between nonhomologous chromosomes) in the htp-1 mutant; 3) full homologous synapsis in the spo-11 mutant; 4) SYP-1 localization in hal-2; chk-2, hal-2; htp-1 and hal-2; spo-11 double mutants, which appears similar to that observed in the hal-2 single mutant, in that extensive SYP-1 is observed to be colocalized with HTP-3 along the axes of unpaired homologs. Bar, 5 µm.


Figure S6

Markers of PC-mediated chromosomal movement in syp-3; hal-2 mutants are dependent on chk-2 . IF images of early prophase nuclei stained with antibodies against SUN-1 S8-Pi reveal the presence of TZ nuclei with clustered chromosomes and SUN-1 S8-Pi NE patches in a syp-3; hal-2 mutant (left panel) and the lack of these features in syp-3; hal-2; chk-2 triple mutant nuclei (right panel), indicating that these markers of PC-mediated chromosomal movement are dependent on chk-2. Bar, 5 µm.


Figure S7

A single ZYG-12::GFP focus associated with HIM-8 persists into pachytene of hal-2; syp-2 mutants. IF images of wild-type and hal-2; syp-2 mutant nuclei of the indicated meiotic stages, co-stained for ZYG-12::GFP and HIM-8. In wild-type germ lines, a single ZYG-12::GFP NE focus associated with HIM-8 persists in nuclei that have exited the clustered chromosome configuration (right panels). Likewise, hal-2; syp-2 double mutants exhibit TZ nuclei with multiple ZYG-12::GFP patches (circled nuclei in left panels), and after release from the clustered chromosome configuration, a single ZYG-12::GFP NE focus colocalizing with HIM-8 persists in pachytene nuclei (left and middle panels). Bar, 5 µm. Animals used for these IF images contained the zyg-12::gfp transgene.


Figure S8

Modified gene prediction for hal-2/T16H12.11. (A) Modified predicted coding sequence for the hal-2/T16H12.11 gene is shown in capital letters, with the additional coding sequence highlighted in yellow; upstream untranslated sequence is shown in lower case. (B) Alignment of the N-terminal portions of HAL-2 orthologs from five different Caenorhabditis species, showing strong conservation of the first N-terminal 13 amino acids. Red indicates identity among all five orthologs; blue indicates conservative substitutions; green indicates semi-conservative substitutions.


Figure S9

SYP-1 forms aggregates and does not localize on chromosomes in hal-2; him-3 double mutants. IF images of pachytene nuclei from a hal-2; him-3 double mutant, showing that SYP-1 is not loaded on chromosomes but does form nuclear aggregates, indicating that HAL-2 is not required for aggregate formation. Bar, 4 µm.


Figure S10

Diffuse SUN-1 S8-Pi NE localization in hal-2 mutant gonad shown in Figure 8A . Immunolocalization of SUN-1 S8-Pi in gonads of the indicated genotypes, with meiosis progressing from left to right. Images shown are the same gonads as those shown in Figure 8A. In the hal-2 mutant gonad shown, early meiotic prophase nuclei lack SUN-1 S8-Pi, and only a small subset of nuclei at a later stage of meiotic prophase exhibit diffuse SUN-1 S8-Pi NE signal, as demonstrated in the zoomed-in image (blue box). The SUN-1 S8-Pi signal was boosted in the zoomed-in image to illustrate the weak diffuse NE localization. Bars, 10 µm.


Figure S11

Irradiation-induced DSBs do not restore chromosome clustering, bright NE-associated ZIM-3 foci or NE patches of SUN-1 S12-Pi in hal-2 mutant gonads. IF images of wild-type and hal-2 mutant early prophase nuclei stained for SUN-1 S12-Pi and ZIM-3. As in unirradiated hal-2 controls, chromosome clustering, ZIM-3 recruitment to PCs and the nuclear envelope, and formation of SUN-1 S12-Pi NE patches are not observed in hal-2 gonads exposed to 5 krad of γ irradiation. Bar, 2 µm.


Table S1

High embryonic lethality and Him phenotype in hal-2 mutants are rescued by GFP::HAL-2.


Text S1

Supplemental materials and methods.


Video S1

ZYG-12::GFP patches move rapidly along the NE in wild-type TZ nuclei. Live imaging of ZYG-12::GFP in Hoechst 33342-stained dissected wild-type worms, showing chromosome-associated ZYG-12::GFP patches moving rapidly along the NE of TZ nuclei. Videos are 3D projections of images captured at 15 sec intervals, displayed at 2 frames/sec. ZYG::GFP is in pink and DNA is in blue. Bar, 4 µm.


Video S2

ZYG-12::GFP does not reorganize into moving NE patches in hal-2 nuclei. Live imaging of ZYG-12::GFP in Hoechst 33342-stained dissected hal-2 worms reveals ZYG-12::GFP localization to the NE. However ZYG-12::GFP did not concentrate into the movement-competent NE patches observed in wild-type TZ nuclei. Videos are 3D projections of images captured at 15 sec intervals, displayed at 2 frames/sec. ZYG::GFP is in pink and DNA is in blue. Bar, 4 µm.


Video S3

High-resolution 3D-SIM image of a wild-type pachytene nucleus. A rotating series of 3D projections of the wild-type pachytene nucleus shown in Figure 3C, highlighting the two spatially resolved LEs of the paired homologs. HTP-3 is in green and HIM-8 is in red.


Video S4

High-resolution 3D-SIM image of a hal-2 mutant pachytene nucleus. A rotating series of 3D projections of the hal-2 mutant pachytene nucleus shown in Figure 3C, which exhibits single LEs rather than resolvable pairs of LEs as were observed in wild-type nuclei. HTP-3 is in green and HIM-8 is in red.


Video S5

Movement-competent ZYG-12::GFP NE patches are restored in hal-2; syp-2 nuclei. Live imaging of ZYG-12::GFP in Hoechst 33342-stained dissected hal-2; syp-2 worms showing the restoration of movement-competent ZYG-12::GFP NE patches in hal-2; syp-2 TZ nuclei. Videos are 3D projections of images captured at 15 sec intervals, displayed at 2 frames/sec. ZYG::GFP is in pink and DNA is in blue. Bar, 4 µm.



We thank S. Mitani for the hal-2(tm4960) allele, A. Dernburg, V. Jantsch, C. Malone, A. la Volpe, M. Zetka, and the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center for reagents and M. Hayashi for technical assistance. We thank members of the Villeneuve lab for helpful discussions.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by an A*STAR National Science Scholarship to WZ, National Institutes of Health grant RO1GM53804 to AMV, and WPI (The World Premier International Research Center Initiative) program for both AS and PMC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Mlynarczyk-Evans S, Villeneuve AM (2010) Homologous chromosome pairing and synapsis during oogenesis. In: Verlhac M-H, Villeneuve AM, editors. Oogenesis: The Universal Process. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 117–140.
2. de Boer E, Heyting C (2006) The diverse roles of transverse filaments of synaptonemal complexes in meiosis. Chromosoma 115: 220–234. [PubMed]
3. Ollinger R, Alsheimer M, Benavente R (2005) Mammalian protein SCP1 forms synaptonemal complex-like structures in the absence of meiotic chromosomes. Mol Biol Cell 16: 212–217. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Goldstein P (1987) Multiple synaptonemal complexes (polycomplexes): origin, structure and function. Cell Biol Int Rep 11: 759–796. [PubMed]
5. Jeffress JK, Page SL, Royer SK, Belden ED, Blumenstiel JP, et al. (2007) The formation of the central element of the synaptonemal complex may occur by multiple mechanisms: the roles of the N- and C-terminal domains of the Drosophila C(3)G protein in mediating synapsis and recombination. Genetics 177: 2445–2456. [PubMed]
6. Sym M, Roeder GS (1995) Zip1-induced changes in synaptonemal complex structure and polycomplex assembly. J Cell Biol 128: 455–466. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Villeneuve AM (1994) A cis-acting locus that promotes crossing over between X chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics 136: 887–902. [PubMed]
8. MacQueen AJ, Phillips CM, Bhalla N, Weiser P, Villeneuve AM, et al. (2005) Chromosome sites play dual roles to establish homologous synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans . Cell 123: 1037–1050. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. McKim KS, Peters K, Rose AM (1993) Two types of sites required for meiotic chromosome pairing in Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics 134: 749–768. [PubMed]
10. MacQueen AJ, Colaiacovo MP, McDonald K, Villeneuve AM (2002) Synapsis-dependent and -independent mechanisms stabilize homolog pairing during meiotic prophase in C. elegans . Genes Dev 16: 2428–2442. [PubMed]
11. Minn IL, Rolls MM, Hanna-Rose W, Malone CJ (2009) SUN-1 and ZYG-12, mediators of centrosome-nucleus attachment, are a functional SUN/KASH pair in Caenorhabditis elegans . Mol Biol Cell 20: 4586–4595. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Phillips CM, Dernburg AF (2006) A family of zinc-finger proteins is required for chromosome-specific pairing and synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans . Dev Cell 11: 817–829. [PubMed]
13. Phillips CM, Wong C, Bhalla N, Carlton PM, Weiser P, et al. (2005) HIM-8 binds to the X chromosome pairing center and mediates chromosome-specific meiotic synapsis. Cell 123: 1051–1063. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Sato A, Isaac B, Phillips CM, Rillo R, Carlton PM, et al. (2009) Cytoskeletal forces span the nuclear envelope to coordinate meiotic chromosome pairing and synapsis. Cell 139: 907–919. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Penkner AM, Fridkin A, Gloggnitzer J, Baudrimont A, Machacek T, et al. (2009) Meiotic chromosome homology search involves modifications of the nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1. Cell 139: 920–933. [PubMed]
16. Penkner A, Tang L, Novatchkova M, Ladurner M, Fridkin A, et al. (2007) The nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1 is required for homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. Dev Cell 12: 873–885. [PubMed]
17. Malone CJ, Misner L, Le Bot N, Tsai MC, Campbell JM, et al. (2003) The C. elegans hook protein, ZYG-12, mediates the essential attachment between the centrosome and nucleus. Cell 115: 825–836. [PubMed]
18. Martinez-Perez E, Villeneuve AM (2005) HTP-1-dependent constraints coordinate homolog pairing and synapsis and promote chiasma formation during C. elegans meiosis. Genes Dev 19: 2727–2743. [PubMed]
19. Kelly KO, Dernburg AF, Stanfield GM, Villeneuve AM (2000) Caenorhabditis elegans msh-5 is required for both normal and radiation-induced meiotic crossing over but not for completion of meiosis. Genetics 156: 617–630. [PubMed]
20. MacQueen AJ, Villeneuve AM (2001) Nuclear reorganization and homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase require C. elegans chk-2 . Genes Dev 15: 1674–1687. [PubMed]
21. Baudrimont A, Penkner A, Woglar A, Machacek T, Wegrostek C, et al. (2010) Leptotene/zygotene chromosome movement via the SUN/KASH protein bridge in Caenorhabditis elegans . PLoS Genet 6: e1001219 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001219. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Wynne DJ, Rog O, Carlton PM, Dernburg AF (2012) Dynein-dependent processive chromosome motions promote homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. J Cell Biol 196: 47–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Hodgkin J, Horvitz HR, Brenner S (1979) Nondisjunction mutants of the nematode CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS. Genetics 91: 67–94. [PubMed]
24. Labella S, Woglar A, Jantsch V, Zetka M (2011) Polo kinases establish links between meiotic chromosomes and cytoskeletal forces essential for homolog pairing. Dev Cell 21: 948–958. [PubMed]
25. Harper NC, Rillo R, Jover-Gil S, Assaf ZJ, Bhalla N, et al. (2011) Pairing centers recruit a Polo-like kinase to orchestrate meiotic chromosome dynamics in C. elegans . Dev Cell 21: 934–947. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Couteau F, Nabeshima K, Villeneuve A, Zetka M (2004) A component of C. elegans meiotic chromosome axes at the interface of homolog alignment, synapsis, nuclear reorganization, and recombination. Curr Biol 14: 585–592. [PubMed]
27. Goodyer W, Kaitna S, Couteau F, Ward JD, Boulton SJ, et al. (2008) HTP-3 links DSB formation with homolog pairing and crossing over during C. elegans meiosis. Dev Cell 14: 263–274. [PubMed]
28. Smolikov S, Eizinger A, Schild-Prufert K, Hurlburt A, McDonald K, et al. (2007) SYP-3 restricts synaptonemal complex assembly to bridge paired chromosome axes during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics 176: 2015–2025. [PubMed]
29. Schild-Prufert K, Saito TT, Smolikov S, Gu Y, Hincapie M, et al. (2011) Organization of the synaptonemal complex during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics 189: 411–421. [PubMed]
30. Gustafsson MG, Shao L, Carlton PM, Wang CJ, Golubovskaya IN, et al. (2008) Three-dimensional resolution doubling in wide-field fluorescence microscopy by structured illumination. Biophys J 94: 4957–4970. [PubMed]
31. Xu H, Beasley MD, Warren WD, van der Horst GT, McKay MJ (2005) Absence of mouse REC8 cohesin promotes synapsis of sister chromatids in meiosis. Dev Cell 8: 949–961. [PubMed]
32. Jin H, Guacci V, Yu HG (2009) Pds5 is required for homologue pairing and inhibits synapsis of sister chromatids during yeast meiosis. J Cell Biol 186: 713–725. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Couteau F, Zetka M (2005) HTP-1 coordinates synaptonemal complex assembly with homolog alignment during meiosis in C. elegans . Genes Dev 19: 2744–2756. [PubMed]
34. Colaiacovo MP, MacQueen AJ, Martinez-Perez E, McDonald K, Adamo A, et al. (2003) Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. Dev Cell 5: 463–474. [PubMed]
35. Smolikov S, Schild-Prufert K, Colaiacovo MP (2009) A yeast two-hybrid screen for SYP-3 interactors identifies SYP-4, a component required for synaptonemal complex assembly and chiasma formation in Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. PLoS Genet 5: e1000669 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000669. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Nabeshima K, Mlynarczyk-Evans S, Villeneuve AM (2011) Chromosome painting reveals asynaptic full alignment of homologs and HIM-8-dependent remodeling of X chromosome territories during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. PLoS Genet 7: e1002231 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002231. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Martinez-Perez E, Schvarzstein M, Barroso C, Lightfoot J, Dernburg AF, et al. (2008) Crossovers trigger a remodeling of meiotic chromosome axis composition that is linked to two-step loss of sister chromatid cohesion. Genes Dev 22: 2886–2901. [PubMed]
38. Nabeshima K, Villeneuve AM, Colaiacovo MP (2005) Crossing over is coupled to late meiotic prophase bivalent differentiation through asymmetric disassembly of the SC. J Cell Biol 168: 683–689. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. McDonnell AV, Jiang T, Keating AE, Berger B (2006) Paircoil2: improved prediction of coiled coils from sequence. Bioinformatics 22: 356–358. [PubMed]
40. Lupas A, Van Dyke M, Stock J (1991) Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 252: 1162–1164. [PubMed]
41. Wang F, Yoder J, Antoshechkin I, Han M (2003) Caenorhabditis elegans EVL-14/PDS-5 and SCC-3 are essential for sister chromatid cohesion in meiosis and mitosis. Mol Cell Biol 23: 7698–7707. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Severson AF, Ling L, van Zuylen V, Meyer BJ (2009) The axial element protein HTP-3 promotes cohesin loading and meiotic axis assembly in C. elegans to implement the meiotic program of chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 23: 1763–1778. [PubMed]
43. Alpi A, Pasierbek P, Gartner A, Loidl J (2003) Genetic and cytological characterization of the recombination protein RAD-51 in Caenorhabditis elegans . Chromosoma 112: 6–16. [PubMed]
44. Smolikov S, Eizinger A, Hurlburt A, Rogers E, Villeneuve AM, et al. (2007) Synapsis-defective mutants reveal a correlation between chromosome conformation and the mode of double-strand break repair during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Genetics 176: 2027–2033. [PubMed]
45. Tang L, Machacek T, Mamnun YM, Penkner A, Gloggnitzer J, et al. (2010) Mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans him-19 show meiotic defects that worsen with age. Mol Biol Cell 21: 885–896. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Borner GV, Barot A, Kleckner N (2008) Yeast Pch2 promotes domainal axis organization, timely recombination progression, and arrest of defective recombinosomes during meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 3327–3332. [PubMed]
47. Wojtasz L, Daniel K, Roig I, Bolcun-Filas E, Xu H, et al. (2009) Mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2, two conserved meiotic chromosomal proteins, are depleted from synapsed chromosome axes with the help of TRIP13 AAA-ATPase. PLoS Genet 5: e1000702 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000702. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. MacQueen AJ, Roeder GS (2009) Fpr3 and Zip3 ensure that initiation of meiotic recombination precedes chromosome synapsis in budding yeast. Curr Biol 19: 1519–1526. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Smolikov S, Schild-Prufert K, Colaiacovo MP (2008) CRA-1 uncovers a double-strand break-dependent pathway promoting the assembly of central region proteins on chromosome axes during C. elegans meiosis. PLoS Genet 4: e1000088 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000088. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Polevoda B, Norbeck J, Takakura H, Blomberg A, Sherman F (1999) Identification and specificities of N-terminal acetyltransferases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae . EMBO J 18: 6155–6168. [PubMed]
51. Polevoda B, Sherman F (2003) N-terminal acetyltransferases and sequence requirements for N-terminal acetylation of eukaryotic proteins. J Mol Biol 325: 595–622. [PubMed]
52. Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics 77: 71–94. [PubMed]
53. Wicks SR, Yeh RT, Gish WR, Waterston RH, Plasterk RH (2001) Rapid gene mapping in Caenorhabditis elegans using a high density polymorphism map. Nat Genet 28: 160–164. [PubMed]
54. Chen H, Hughes DD, Chan TA, Sedat JW, Agard DA (1996) IVE (Image Visualization Environment): a software platform for all three-dimensional microscopy applications. J Struct Biol 116: 56–60. [PubMed]
55. Dernburg AF, McDonald K, Moulder G, Barstead R, Dresser M, et al. (1998) Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 94: 387–398. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science