PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bioinfoLink to Publisher's site
 
Bioinformatics. Aug 15, 2012; 28(16): 2191–2192.
Published online Jun 19, 2012. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/bts345
PMCID: PMC3413391
Accelerated protein structure comparison using TM-score-GPU
Ling-Hong Hung* and Ram Samudrala
Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7735, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Associate Editor: Anna Tramontano
Received April 10, 2012; Revised May 23, 2012; Accepted June 9, 2012.
Motivation: Accurate comparisons of different protein structures play important roles in structural biology, structure prediction and functional annotation. The root-mean-square-deviation (RMSD) after optimal superposition is the predominant measure of similarity due to the ease and speed of computation. However, global RMSD is dependent on the length of the protein and can be dominated by divergent loops that can obscure local regions of similarity. A more sophisticated measure of structure similarity, Template Modeling (TM)-score, avoids these problems, and it is one of the measures used by the community-wide experiments of critical assessment of protein structure prediction to compare predicted models with experimental structures. TM-score calculations are, however, much slower than RMSD calculations. We have therefore implemented a very fast version of TM-score for Graphical Processing Units (TM-score-GPU), using a new and novel hybrid Kabsch/quaternion method for calculating the optimal superposition and RMSD that is designed for parallel applications. This acceleration in speed allows TM-score to be used efficiently in computationally intensive applications such as for clustering of protein models and genome-wide comparisons of structure.
Results: TM-score-GPU was applied to six sets of models from Nutritious Rice for the World for a total of 3 million comparisons. TM-score-GPU is 68 times faster on an ATI 5870 GPU, on average, than the original CPU single-threaded implementation on an AMD Phenom II 810 quad-core processor.
Availability and implementation: The complete source, including the GPU code and the hybrid RMSD subroutine, can be downloaded and used without restriction at http://software.compbio.washington.edu/misc/downloads/tmscore/. The implementation is in C++/OpenCL.
Contact: ram/at/compbio.washington.edu
Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
For protein structure comparisons, the simplest method is to calculate a transformation that superimposes corresponding atoms from one structure onto a second structure and minimizes the root-mean-square-deviation (RMSD) between the coordinates of the superimposed structures [Equation (1)]. This can be obtained from the single value decomposition of the covariance matrix (Kabsch, 1976) or from the solution of the eigenvalue equation of a quaternion derived matrix (Hung et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2010). Although RMSD is a fast and easily calculated metric of structural similarity, a globally optimal transformation that minimizes the distances between all superimposed atom pairs can be dominated by a small set of divergent atoms in loop regions. Furthermore, RMSD is not only dependent on the overall goodness of fit but also dependent on the length of the proteins. TM-score (Zhang and Skolnick, 2004) uses a variant of the Levitt–Gerstein (LG) metric (Gerstein and Levitt, 1998) that provides a length independent measure and limits the impact of divergent pairs of atoms in superimposed structures [Equation (1)].
A mathematical equation, expression, or formula.
 Object name is bts345m1.jpg
(1)
In the above formula, L is the length of the protein, di is the distance between the i th matched Cα atom and d0 a scaling factor to normalize the matches. For small proteins the optimal value of d0 is 4.5 Å. The LG-based metric gives a value between 0 and 1 where 1 is an exact match. The maximum value of LG that can be obtained by superposition is the TM-score. Unlike RMSD, there is no simple relationship between the covariance matrix and the optimal transformation that maximizes LG. Instead, different subsets of atoms are superimposed using the Kabsch algorithm and the LG score evaluated over the entire protein. By sampling a large number of subsets, an approximately optimal superposition can be obtained. Because of the numerous local superpositions that must be sampled, the TM-score algorithm is much slower than the calculation of global RMSD. We present TM-score-GPU which is a fast Graphical Processing Unit (GPU) implementation of TM-score using a new hybrid RMSD algorithm that is suitable for parallel single instruction multiple data (SIMD) applications.
GPUs rely on the same instructions being executed simultaneously on different data (SIMD) to accelerate the calculations. For each group of data (wavefront), all branches of conditional code are executed which makes complicated branching of code slow for GPUs. Iteration can also be expensive for SIMD applications as all threads wait for the longest iteration to finish. Our hybrid implementation first calculates the eigenvalues of the square of the covariance matrix R by analytically solving for the roots of the cubic characteristic polynomial [Equation (3)]. This is the first part of the Kabsch algorithm. The quaternion algorithm obtains the optimal superposition and RMSD by solving for the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of matrix S in Equation (4). d from Equation (3) is also an eigenvalue of matrix S. The fast analytical method from qcprot (Liu et al., 2010) is then used to solve for the eigenvectors of matrix S and construct the rotation matrix [Equations (2–4) and Equations (1–8) in Supplemental materials]. This hybrid method avoids the complicated branching code used to calculate rotations in the Kabsch method and avoids the iterative methods used to solve for the eigenvalues of the S matrix used in quaternion methods. The resulting algorithm has a non-divergent code path, has no iteration and is significantly faster. The single-threaded TM-score implementation using the hybrid method is 45% faster than the original Kabsch-based implementation and 58% faster than qcprot (see Fig. 1).
A mathematical equation, expression, or formula.
 Object name is bts345m2.jpg
(2)
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Speed of TM-score-GPU versus CPU implementations. The times required to calculate the TM-score between all pairs of structures in six different ensembles of 1000 models are shown. The models are from the Nutritious Rice for the World project and range (more ...)
where v are the eigenvectors of S, R is the covariance matrix and d is derived from the eigenvalues of R2:
A mathematical equation, expression, or formula.
 Object name is bts345m3.jpg
(3)
A mathematical equation, expression, or formula.
 Object name is bts345m4.jpg
(4)
Memory I/O is the other major bottleneck for GPU implementation. It is advantageous to buffer coordinates into fast local and register memory. The number of superpositions increases roughly by N log N, where N is the number of residues whereas the cost to buffer the coordinates grows linearly. Therefore, the caching of coordinates is especially beneficial for larger proteins. A greater number of active threads can also be beneficial by allowing the scheduler to switch between threads when one is stalled during a memory wait state. The application therefore calculates the optimal number of SIMD threads that can be launched without exhausting the scarce fast memory resources. The implementation also rearranges the coordinates into vectors of four floating point values. ATI GPUs are optimized for I/O and compute operations on 4-vectors. The implementation is in C++/OpenCL using AMDAPP2.5 for Linux and is optimized for ATI cards. However, the OpenCL code can be compiled and optimized for other GPUs and CPUs that support double precision arithmetic.
TM-score-GPU was applied to six sets of 1000 de novo protein models from Nutritious Rice for the World. The TM-score between each pair of structures within an ensemble was then calculated. TM-score-GPU is 68 ± 3 times faster on an ATI 5870 GPU, on average, than the original CPU single-threaded implementation on an AMD Phenom II 810 quad-core processor (see Fig. 1).
We have implemented a very fast version of the structural comparison TM-score algorithm using a novel hybrid Kabsch/quaternion method for superposition that is suitable for SIMD applications. We anticipate that TM-score-GPU will be useful in applications such as clustering and in methods that compare structures with different sequences such as TM-align (Zhang and Skolnick, 2005). Our particular application is for large community grid projects where few volunteers have access to CPU computational clusters but where GPUs are commonplace and provide most of the compute cycles. In addition, the new SIMD friendly superposition routine will be useful in software where fast parallel superpositions are required. Finally, our implementation is in OpenCL, which is a very new language for GPUs. We anticipate that our implementation be of interest to others who wish to port code from languages that have been deprecated (Brook+) or may soon be deprecated (CUDA). The complete source code, including the GPU and superposition subroutines, is available for unrestricted use from http://software.compbio.washington.edu/misc/downloads/tmscore/
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Data
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Yang Zhang for making the TM-score code freely available; Gaurav Chopra, Jeremy Horst and Ambrish Roy for their helpful comments on the manuscript and Thomas Wood for testing the source distribution.
Funding: The NIH Director's Pioneer Award 1DP1OD006779-01.
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
  • Gerstein M., Levitt M. Comprehensive assessment of automatic structural alignment against a manual standard, the scop classification of proteins. Protein Sci. 1998;7:445–456. [PubMed]
  • Hung L.H., et al. GPU-Q-J, a fast method for calculating root mean square deviation (RMSD) after optimal superposition. BMC Res. Notes. 2011;4:97. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kabsch W. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr. A. 1976;32:922–923.
  • Liu P., et al. Fast determination of the optimal rotational matrix for macromolecular superpositions. J. Comput. Chem. 2010;31:1561–1563. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zhang Y., Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins. 2004;57:702–710. [PubMed]
  • Zhang Y., Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:2302–2309. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Articles from Bioinformatics are provided here courtesy of
Oxford University Press