PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jwhMary Ann Liebert, Inc.Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.JournalsSearchAlerts
Journal of Women's Health
 
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 June; 21(6): 656–665.
PMCID: PMC3412579

Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Use Among Adolescent Girls and Young Adult Women: An Analysis of the 2007 California Health Interview Survey

Jasmin A. Tiro, Ph.D.,corresponding author1 Jennifer Tsui, M.P.H.,2 Heidi M. Bauer, M.D., M.S., M.P.H.,3 Eileen Yamada, M.D., M.P.H.,4 Sarah Kobrin, Ph.D.,5 and Nancy Breen, Ph.D.5

Abstract

Background

Administration of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is recommended for adolescent girls and young adult women. Little is known about the factors associated with vaccination. This study examined prevalence and correlates of HPV vaccine initiation (≥1 dose) among a statewide representative sample of adolescent and young adult females living in California.

Methods

HPV vaccination data on 3615 parents of adolescent girls aged 12–17 and 2068 young adult women aged 18–27 from the 2007 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) were examined by sociodemographic, healthcare access, and health behavior factors using chi-square and multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

Nineteen percent of adolescent girls and 11% of young adult women had initiated the HPV vaccine series. In both groups, lower educational attainment (parental/own) was associated with lack of vaccine initiation. For adolescents, vaccine initiation was also significantly lower among those whose parents had low incomes or no usual source of care. For young adults, initiation was lower among the older group and those who spent less time in the United States, had public insurance, had no recent provider visit, or had fewer sexual partners.

Conclusions

In a statewide representative sample, different correlates of early initiation of HPV vaccination emerged for Californian adolescent girls and young adult women. These different patterns may be due to differential access to programs that provide free or low-cost HPV vaccines. Because several of these factors are associated with disparities in use of Pap tests, disparities will persist or even worsen unless greater effort is placed on vaccinating populations at highest risk for cervical cancer.

Introduction

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and other organizations recommend routine human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of girls aged 11–12 and catch-up vaccination for females aged 13–26 who have not already initiated the vaccine series.13 Most U.S. studies on HPV vaccination have focused on use in adolescent populations and have documented their initiation rates (receipt of ≥1 dose in the 3-dose series).420 Fewer studies have documented vaccination in young adult women, the catch-up population.4,5,8,11,16,2126 Past studies examining HPV initiation rates found lower uptake among young adults (range 9%–16%)11,16,2126 than among adolescents (range 10%–64%)6,7,920 Comparing HPV vaccine rates and correlates of initiation in adolescent vs. young adult populations is of particular interest because few studies have systematically sampled both age groups,16 and the federal Vaccines for Children (VFC) program provides the vaccine only for eligible individuals aged ≤18 (for more information about the VFC program, go to www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/default.htm).

Adoption of the HPV vaccine by populations at highest risk for cervical cancer has the potential to reduce disparities.2730 Studies have shown that nonwhite, low socioeconomic status (SES), and immigrant populations who are medically underserved are at high risk because of low screening rates with the Pap test and inadequate follow-up of abnormal results. Other cervical cancer risk factors that also may play a role in disparities include smoking, co-infection with HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), high parity, and long-term oral contraceptive use.31 Even after implementation of the federally funded Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in 1990, disparities in screening use and follow-up persist.32,33

We assessed prevalence and correlates of HPV vaccine initiation among adolescent girls aged 12–17 and among young adult women aged 18–27 living in California and compared them. California has the highest number of new cervical cancer cases and deaths among all states and higher mortality rates among Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans compared to non-Hispanic whites.3437 Despite efforts to increase Pap testing among nonwhite, low-income, uninsured, and immigrant populations,38,39 screening remains underused. HPV vaccination could reduce disparities in cervical cancer that Pap testing and follow-up have not been able to address. Thus, monitoring HPV vaccination is critical for assessing the potential impact of this new prevention method on cervical cancer disparities.

Materials and Methods

We used data from the 2007 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS). CHIS is a random-digit dial (RDD) telephone survey of households representative of California's noninstitutionalized residents. CHIS provides information on health behaviors, health status, and healthcare access in California's diverse population, offering interviews in six languages: English, Spanish, Cantonese, Mandarin, Korean, and Vietnamese. All observations and variables included in this analysis were collected from June 2007 to March 2008, when only the quadrivalent HPV vaccine had been approved and recommended in the United States.40

Study sample

In CHIS 2007, questions related to receipt, knowledge, and acceptance of the HPV vaccine were administered to women aged 18–27 (27-year-olds were included because they were age eligible when the vaccine became available in 2006) and to respondents who were parents of a female adolescent aged 12–17 (determined by household enumeration). If there were more than one age-eligible daughter, interviewers randomly selected one of them and asked the parent to restrict answers to that particular adolescent. HPV data reported by adolescents were not examined in this study. The CHIS 2007 adult overall response rate was 18.3%,41 similar to other RDD surveys, including the 2007 California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).41 We analyzed data from 3615 parents and 2068 young adult women.

HPV vaccine outcomes

HPV measures were developed by a working group of local, state, and national experts, including scientists from the California Department of Public Health, CDC, National Cancer Institute (NCI), and UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. All measures were tested in the National Center for Health Statistics Cognitive Lab for fielding on the 2008 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and CHIS 2007. They were them translated, culturally assessed, and pilot tested using standard CHIS protocol. Our primary outcome was HPV vaccine initiation. Respondents were asked if they had ever heard of the HPV vaccine (yes, no). Those who had were asked if they/their daughter had ever received it (yes, no) and, if yes, how many doses. Adolescents and young adults who received ≥1 dose were coded as having initiated the vaccine.

Secondary outcomes we assessed were heard of HPV and knowledge that HPV can cause cervical cancer, can be transmitted through sexual contact, and can go away on its own without treatment (yes, no, don't know). Item nonresponse to HPV items was <1%. All CHIS data were imputed using standard methods by CHIS investigators at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.41

Covariates

Sociodemographic, healthcare access, and health behavior variables were selected based on the variables collected in the survey and literature supporting their association with cervical cancer screening, acceptability and uptake of the HPV vaccine, or knowledge of HPV.16,29,42,43 Analysis categories are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.
Sociodemographic, Healthcare Access, Health Behavior, and Human Papillomavirus Characteristics of Californian Parents of Adolescent Females Aged 12–17 and Women Aged 18–27, California Health Interview Survey, 2007

Sociodemographics

Variables measured included age of respondent, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, household income as a percentage of the federal poverty level (FPL), time in the United States, and language of survey administration. For the adolescent sample, we report the sociodemographic characteristics of the parent. Parent's gender and age of the adolescent daughter were also collected. Eighteen-year-old women in the young adult sample were analyzed separately because VFC program eligibility includes 18-year-olds.

Healthcare access

Three variables were measured: type of health insurance, usual source of healthcare other than emergency room, and whether respondent had visited a healthcare provider in the past year. Parents were asked about their child's healthcare access.

Health behaviors

For young adult women, three variables were assessed: influenza vaccination in the past year, ever had Pap test, and number of sexual partners in the past year. Parents were not asked to report these behaviors for their child; therefore, they were not included in the correlates analyses.

Statistical analysis

To assess prevalence and correlates of initiation in both samples, we assumed that respondents who had not heard of the vaccine had not gotten it for their daughter or received it themselves. We believed this was a reasonable assumption because the 2008 NHIS data showed that <1% of women who had not heard of the HPV vaccine reported getting it.26 Chi-square tests were conducted to identify significant associations between HPV vaccine initiation and covariates of interest. A series of multivariable logistic regression models, using a backwards elimination process, were run to identify covariates that remained associated with initiation in the presence of other variables.44 Variables associated with initiation in bivariate analyses (p≤0.20) were entered into the initial multivariable model. Variables with the largest Wald F p values were removed sequentially from subsequent models. At each step, if the likelihood ratio test comparing the reduced and full models was significant or if the beta coefficients of statistically significant variables in the previous step changed by >25% (i.e., evidence of possible confounding), the full model was retained. This backwards elimination process was continued until all covariates had a Wald F p value ≤0.05. Health behavior covariates were not entered into the models for adolescent girls because of availability (e.g., parents were not asked about daughter's Pap test use and number of sexual partners). All estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were weighted to incorporate the CHIS 2007 sampling design. Analyses were conducted using Sudaan 10.0.1 (Research Triangle Park, NC).

Results

Table 1 shows the distribution of sociodemographic, healthcare access, health behavior characteristics, and HPV vaccine and knowledge outcomes for parents of adolescent girls and for young adult women who responded to the CHIS 2007. In both samples, the most prevalent racial/ethnic group was Hispanic, followed by non-Hispanic whites, Asians/Pacific Islanders, blacks, and American Indians/Alaskan Natives/multiracial. Most respondents had graduated from high school, were born in the United States, completed the survey in English, had private health insurance, had a usual source of healthcare, and visited a provider in the past year. Most parents were married (79.2 weighted % [W%], 95% CI 77.0-81.3), and only 18.7 W% (95% CI 16.5-21.2) of young adult women were married. Among young adults, most had a Pap test and one or more sexual partners in the past year; only 21.0 W% (95% CI 18.0-24.3) received the influenza vaccine in the past year.

Nineteen percent of adolescent girls (reported by parents) and 11.0 W% of young adult women had initiated the HPV vaccine series (Table 1). Among those not vaccinated, 41.5 W% of parents and 33.9 W% of young adults had not heard of the vaccine. Most parents and young women had heard of HPV disease. Most knew that it can cause cervical cancer and that it is sexually transmitted, but few knew that it could go away without treatment.

Correlates of HPV vaccine initiation for adolescent girls

Table 2 shows the distribution of parent-reported covariates in relation to daughter's HPV vaccine initiation status, p values from chi-square analyses, and adjusted odds ratios (OR) from the final multivariate model. Chi-square analyses found the following associated with lack of vaccine initiation: lower educational attainment, being married/living with a partner, lower income, less time in the United States, completing the survey in a language other than English, being uninsured, having no usual source of healthcare, and not having visited a provider in the past year (p<0.05). In multivariate analyses, parents who had less than a college degree, incomes 100%–199% of the FPL, or no usual source of care remained significantly less likely to have initiated the HPV vaccine series for their daughter compared to those who graduated from college, reported an income ≥300% above the FPL, or had a usual source of care. Hispanics parents were more likely than non-Hispanic whites to have their daughters vaccinated (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.10-2.35). Although not significantly associated with initiation, marital status and time in the United States were retained in the multivariable model because their absence altered the magnitude of associations for other variables.

Table 2.
Weighted Distribution of Characteristics and Multivariate Logistic Regression Model of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Initiation Among California Parents of Adolescent Females 12–17 Years Old, California Health Interview Survey 2007 (Unweighted ...

Correlates of HPV vaccine initiation for young adult women

Table 3 shows the distribution of self-reported covariates in relation to young women's initiation status, along with p values from chi-square analyses, and adjusted ORs from the final multivariate model. In bivariate analyses, the following were associated with lack of initiation: older age, nonwhite race/ethnicity, lower educational attainment, being married/living with partner, less time in the United States, non-English survey interview, no/public insurance, no provider visit in the past year, no influenza vaccine, and fewer sexual partners (p<0.05). In multivariate analyses, women with the following characteristics remained significantly less likely to have initiated the HPV vaccine: being older than 18, having less than a college degree, living in the United States for <5 years, having public insurance, not having visited a provider in the past year, and having fewer than two sexual partners in the past year. Although not significantly associated, the following were retained in the multivariable model because their absence altered the magnitude of associations for other variables: race/ethnicity, income, language of survey, influenza vaccine, and Pap test.

Table 3.
Weighted Distribution of Characteristics and Multivariate Logistic Regression Model of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Initiation Among California Women Aged 18–27, California Health Interview Survey, 2007 (Unweighted n=2068)

Discussion

Early measures of HPV vaccine initiation in California were 19.4% for adolescent girls and 11.0% for young adult women. Compared to national data from 2007, which showed 25% uptake among adolescents aged 13–17,7 the California adolescent vaccination rate is lower; however, the young adult estimate for California parallels the U.S. estimate (11.7%).22,23 CHIS population-based estimates were lower than published reports of adolescent and young adult females enrolled in a large managed care organization in Southern California (adolescent: 19% vs. 37%; adult: 11% vs. 16%).17 CHIS data show that socioeconomically disadvantaged groups (e.g., poor, less educated, and immigrants) and those with poor access to care had lower vaccine initiation when the HPV vaccine was released. Our data measured a range of correlates of vaccination for California adolescent girls and young adult women. Consistent with some other studies, our analyses of both age groups showed that populations with lower educational attainment and poor access to care (indicated by lack of insurance or usual source of care) had lower rates of HPV vaccination.8,17,22,23 For young adult women, being 18 years old was also consistently associated with vaccine initiation in our and other studies,8,16,26 perhaps due to eligibility in the federally funded VFC program. Among adolescents, we found no association between age and vaccine initiation.

There are several possible reasons why vaccination among those ≤18 is higher than among adults, including VFC eligibility, greater availability of the vaccine in the pediatric care setting, routine pediatric care immunization practices differing from adult immunization practices, parental awareness and support, endorsement of vaccination before sexual debut, and provider recommendations. With respect to the underserved adolescent population eligible for VFC, the state health department notified VFC providers in December 2006 that they could begin ordering. Clearly, the VFC program removes cost as a barrier to vaccination among those ≤18 who are VFC eligible. Efforts to help parents identify a medical home may help those lacking a usual source of care to take advantage of adolescent vaccines through the VFC program.45 Although Medicaid in California provided coverage of the HPV vaccine for young adult women aged 19–26 from January 2007, Medicaid did not announce coverage to providers until September 2007, halfway through the CHIS 2007 data collection.46 Delayed awareness of Medicaid's HPV vaccine policy relative to the CHIS data collection cycle could have negatively impacted vaccine recommendation rates by providers and vaccine uptake by those covered by public insurance. Lower vaccination rates among publicly insured adult women may be partly explained by the fact that many young adult women become eligible for public insurance programs when they become pregnant, and the vaccine is not recommended for pregnant women. For privately insured women, lower rates may be due to the fact that many receive primary care through gynecologists or family planning clinics who do not routinely offer vaccines. Also, because ACIP recommendations for use of HPV vaccine were not published until March 2007, providers may have chosen to wait to purchase this expensive vaccine until they were certain it was covered by all health plans and programs; this may have contributed to the delay in uptake of the vaccine.

Previously published studies of HPV vaccine initiation have reported conflicting results about its association with race/ethnicity, income, and education in both age groups. Some studies show higher vaccination rates among those with higher incomes,16,18,22 higher educational attainment,16,19 and white race/ethnicity,9,16,17,24,26 whereas others show negative or no association.8,9,11,17,22,23 The conflicting results may be because of different multivariate models or distribution of other key variables in the populations being studied. In our data on adolescents, Hispanic ethnicity was associated with higher vaccination rates. Future research needs to monitor HPV vaccination trends by race/ethnicity and age to determine if racial/ethnic disparities in cervical cancer attributable to low screening in the past may continue because of lower uptake of the HPV vaccine.

Our study could not confirm whether or not HPV vaccination is associated with other preventive behaviors in young adult women. Although the association between HPV and influenza vaccination was not statistically significant in this study, the direction and magnitude are consistent with other studies, where they were significant.16,26 We did not find an association between HPV vaccination and Pap screening. This may be because vaccination was higher among younger women not eligible for screening (recommended age to begin screening is 21 years).4749 Other studies have shown lower vaccination rates among married than single women and argued that marital status is a proxy for a perceived lower risk of future HPV infection because of fewer new sexual contacts.22,26

Our study is the first to examine the association between HPV vaccination and number of sexual partners in the past year. We found that women with more partners have higher vaccination rates than those with one partner or none. If this reflects perceived risk of future infection, it may help explain higher use of vaccine in this group. Women vaccinated as young adults may be sexually active before vaccination and, thus, already exposed to oncogenic HPV types in the vaccine. Therefore, it is especially important that future Pap testing among this catch-up population be monitored.

Structural interventions and policies designed to improve access to the HPV vaccine, such as the VFC program and campaigns to increase awareness about the vaccine, may be especially beneficial for parents and young women who are less educated, have low incomes, less time in the United States, or do not have a usual source of care.50,51 Affordable Care Act (ACA) legislation, which expands coverage for young adults under their parents' plans and Medicaid eligibility to low-income childless adults and prohibits copays for preventive care, will likely improve access to the vaccine. Future studies should monitor whether the ACA will have a positive impact on young adults' and adolescents' access to and receipt of the HPV vaccine.

Our study is subject to some limitations. First, data were collected early after licensure of the HPV vaccine and a couple of months after publication of the official ACIP recommendations; therefore, lower initiation rates are to be expected. Access may have been limited because of providers' decisions to purchase and stock the vaccine. California data from the 2008 and 2009 National Immunization Survey-Teen show that HPV vaccine initiation rates held steady at 46.6% and 49.2%, respectively (data at the state level were not reported in 2007).9,20 Second, our data are subject to self-report bias; however, a recent study showed very high agreement between parent-reported adolescent vaccination status and medical record data.52 No studies have examined accuracy of self-report for HPV vaccination in young adult populations. Third, the CHIS response rate was low, but it was similar to that in other RDD surveys (California BRFSS 2007 and HINTS 2007 response rates were 24.1% and 24.0%, respectively53,54), and lower response rates do not automatically equate to more biased estimates.55,56 Studies comparing sociodemographics from CHIS and the California Census indicate that CHIS is representative of the California population. In addition, CHIS 2007 included a sample of cell phone-only households weighted to represent adults who only have a cell phone and do not have access to a landline telephone.

Conclusions

This is the first study to provide statewide correlates of HPV vaccine initiation using a diverse, population-based sample of adolescent girls and young adult women. Early after HPV vaccine licensure (June 2007–March 2008), we found 19% of California adolescents and 11% of young adult women had initiated the HPV vaccine series. Our estimates parallel levels documented in other studies during the same time period. We found lack of vaccination was associated with key markers of healthcare disparities: lower educational attainment and poor access to healthcare among young adult women. Because these same factors have been associated with lower rates of Pap screening for cervical cancer, our analysis suggests that unless greater effort is placed on vaccinating the populations at highest risk for cervical cancer, disparities will persist or worsen. Better access to preventive healthcare and the HPV vaccine because of the ACA and better immunization of our younger populations over time may help improve immunization rates in our young adults and prevent gaps from emerging among adolescent girls.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the efforts of the cross-agency team that developed HPV vaccine questions for the California Health Interview Survey, including Joan Chow and Rain Mocello of the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Branch and Eileen Yamada and Nisha Gandhi of the Immunization Branch, California Department of Public Health; David Grant of the University of California at Los Angeles; and Nicole Liddon of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. During the completion of this article, I.A.T. was supported by an NCI contract (Contract ID 901120). We thank Timothy McNeel from Information Management Services, Inc., for his assistance conducting the statistical analyses and Dr. Rebecca Anhang Price for reviewing drafts of this article.

Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

1. Saslow D. Castle PE. Cox JT, et al. American Cancer Society Guideline for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine use to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:7–28. [PubMed]
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Adolescent Health Care and The ACOG Working Group on Immunization. Human papillomavirus vaccination. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:699–705. [PubMed]
3. Markowitz LE. Dunne EF. Saraiya M, et al. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007;56(RR-2):1–24. [PubMed]
4. Kahn JA. Rosenthal SL. Jin Y. Huang B. Namakydoust A. Zimet GD. Rates of human papillomavirus vaccination, attitudes about vaccination, and human papillomavirus prevalence in young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:1103–1110. [PubMed]
5. Jaspan DM. Dunton CJ. Cook TL. Acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccine by gynecologists in an urban setting. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2008;12:118–121. [PubMed]
6. Rosenthal SL. Rupp R. Zimet GD, et al. Uptake of HPV vaccine: Demographics, sexual history and values, parenting style, and vaccine attitudes. J Adolesc Health. 2008;43:239–245. [PubMed]
7. Jain N. Stokley S. Yankey D. Vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years, United States, 2007. MMWR. 2008;57:1100–1103. [PubMed]
8. Conroy K. Rosenthal SL. Zimet GD, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine uptake, predictors of vaccination, and self-reported barriers to vaccination. J Womens Health. 2009;18:1679–1686. [PubMed]
9. Stokley S. Dorell C. Yankey D. National, state, and local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years—United States, 2008. MMWR. 2009;58:997–1001. [PubMed]
10. Chao C. Slezak JM. Coleman KJ. Jacobsen SJ. Papanicolaou screening behavior in mothers and human papillomavirus vaccine uptake in adolescent girls. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1137–1142. [PubMed]
11. Caskey R. Lindau ST. Alexander GC. Knowledge and early adoption of the HPV vaccine among girls and young women: Results of a national survey. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45:453–462. [PubMed]
12. Dempsey AF. Abraham LM. Dalton V. Ruffin M. Understanding the reasons why mothers do or do not have their adolescent daughters vaccinated against human papillomavirus. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19:531–538. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Gerend MA. Weibley E. Bland H. Parental response to human papillomavirus vaccine availability: Uptake and intentions. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45:528–531. [PubMed]
14. Gottlieb SL. Brewer NT. Sternberg MR, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine initiations in an area with elevated rates of cervical cancer. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45:430–437. [PubMed]
15. Reiter PL. Brewer NT. Gottlieb SL. McRee AL. Smith JS. Parents' health beliefs and HPV vaccination of their adolescent daughters. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:475–480. [PubMed]
16. Chao C. Velicer C. Slezak JM. Jacobsen SJ. Correlates for human papillomavirus vaccination of adolescent girls and young women in a managed care organization. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171:357–367. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Dempsey A. Cohn L. Dalton V. Ruffin M. Patient and clinic factors associated with adolescent human papillomavirus vaccine utilization within a university-based health system. Vaccine. 2010;28:989–995. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Pruitt SL. Schootman M. Geographic disparity, area-level poverty and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among girls in 6 U.S. states. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:525–533. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Mathur MB. Mathur VS. Reichling DB. Participation in the decision to become vaccinated against human papillomavirus by California high school girls and the predictors of vaccine status. J Pediatr Health Care. 2010;24:14–24. [PubMed]
20. Dorell C. Stokley S. Yankey D. Cohn AC. National, state, and local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years—United States, 2009. MMWR. 2010;59:1018–1023. [PubMed]
21. Allen JD. Mohllajee AP. Shelton RC. Othus MK. Fontenot HB. Hanna R. Stage of adoption of the human papillomavirus vaccine among college women. Prev Med. 2009;48:420–425. [PubMed]
22. Jain N. Euler GL. Shefer A. Lu P. Yankey D. Markowitz L. Human papillomavirus (HPV) awareness and vaccination initiation among women in the United States, National Immunization Survey–Adult 2007. Prev Med. 2009;48:426–431. [PubMed]
23. Schiller JS. Euler GL. NCHS health E-Stats: Vaccination coverage estimates from the National Health Interview Survey: United States. 2008. www.cdc gov/nchs/data/hestat/vaccine_coverage pdf www.cdc gov/nchs/data/hestat/vaccine_coverage pdf
24. Licht AS. Murphy JM. Hyland AJ. Fix BV. Hawk LW. Mahoney MC. Is use of the human papillomavirus vaccine among female college students related to human papillomavirus knowledge and risk perception? Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86:74–78. [PubMed]
25. Roberts ME. Gerrard M. Reimer R. Gibbons FX. Mother-daughter communication and human papillomavirus vaccine uptake by college students. Pediatrics. 2010;125:982–989. [PubMed]
26. Anhang Price R. Tiro JA. Saraiya M. Meissner H. Breen N. Use of human papillomavirus vaccines among young adult women in the United States: An analysis of the 2008 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2011;117:5560–5568. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Tiro JA. Saraiya M. Jain N, et al. HPV and cervical cancer behavioral surveillance in the United States. Cancer. 2008;113(Suppl 10):3013–1330. [PubMed]
28. Freeman HP. Wingrove BK. Excess cervical cancer mortality: A marker for low access to health care in poor communities. Rockville, MD: National Cancer Institute, Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities; 2005. Report No. NIH Pub. No. 05-5282.
29. Hewitt M. Devesa SS. Breen N. Cervical cancer screening among U.S. women: Analyses of the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med. 2004;39:270–278. [PubMed]
30. Singh GK. Miller BA. Hankey BF. Edwards BK. Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in U.S. incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage, and survival, 1975–2000. Cancer. 2004;101:1051–1057. [PubMed]
31. Bosch FX. de SS. The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. Dis Markers. 2007;23:213–227. [PubMed]
32. Adams EK. Breen N. Joski PJ. Impact of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on mammography and Pap test utilization among white, Hispanic, and African American women: 1996–2000. Cancer. 2007;109(Suppl 2):348–358. [PubMed]
33. Swan J. Breen N. Graubard BI, et al. Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States: Results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2010;116:4872–4881. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2006 incidence and mortality. Web-based report. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2010.
35. Coughlin SS. Richards TB. Nasseri K, et al. Cervical cancer incidence in the United States in the US-Mexico border region, 1998–2003. Cancer. 2008;113(Suppl 10):2964–2973. [PubMed]
36. Bates JH. Hofer BM. Parikh-Patel A. Cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and survival among Asian subgroups in California, 1990–2004. Cancer. 2008;113(Suppl 10):2955–2963. [PubMed]
37. Hofer BM. Bates JH. McCusker ME. Nasseri K. Cress RD. Snipes KP. Cervical cancer in California, 2008. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health, Cancer Surveillance Section; 2008.
38. Taylor VM. Nguyen TT. Jackson JC. McPhee SJ. Cervical cancer control research in Vietnamese American communities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:2924–2930. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Maxwell AE. Bastani R. Vida P. Warda US. Results of a randomized trial to increase breast and cervical cancer screening among Filipino American women. Prev Med. 2003;37:102–109. [PubMed]
40. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA licenses new vaccine for prevention of cervical cancer and other diseases in females caused by human papillomavirus. www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2006/NEW01385.html www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2006/NEW01385.html
41. University of California Los Angeles Center for Health Policy Research. California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) 2007 Methodology Series: Report 4—Response rates. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2009.
42. Brewer NT. Fazekas KI. Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability: A theory-informed, systematic review. Prev Med. 2007;45:107–114. [PubMed]
43. Tiro JA. Meissner HI. Kobrin S. Chollette V. What do women in the U.S. know about human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:288–294. [PubMed]
44. Hosmer DW. Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
45. Szilagyi PG. Rand CM. McLaurin J, et al. Delivering adolescent vaccinations in the medical home: A new era? Pediatrics. 2008;121(Suppl 1):S15–S24. [PubMed]
46. California Department of Health Care Services. HPV vaccine update, in Medi-Cal update part 2—Billing and policy. Bulletin. 2007:399.
47. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Cervical cytology screening. ACOG practice bulletin No.109. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1409–1420. [PubMed]
48. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: Recommendations and rationale. 2006. www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/cervcan/cervcanrr.htm www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/cervcan/cervcanrr.htm
49. Smith RA. Cokkinides V. Brooks D. Saslow D. Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:99–119. [PubMed]
50. Hinman AR. Orenstein WA. Adult immunization: What can we learn from the childhood immunization program? Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:1532–1535. [PubMed]
51. Infectious Disease Society of America. Policy principles actions to strengthen adult and adolescent immunization coverage in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:e104–e108. [PubMed]
52. Dorell C. Jain N. Yankey D. Validity of parent-reported vaccination status for adolescents aged 13–17 years: National Immunization Survey-Teen, 2008. Public Health Rep. 2011;126(Suppl 2):60–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System summary Data Quality Report. 2008.
54. Cantor D. Coa K. Crystal-Mansour S. Davis T. Dipko S. Sigman R. Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2007 final report. 2009
55. Keeter S. Miller C. Kohut A. Groves R. Presser S. Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a large national telephone survey. Public Opin Q. 2000;64:125–148. [PubMed]
56. Tourangeau R. Survey research and societal change. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:775–801. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Women's Health are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.